Slashdot Mirror


Breakthrough In Plastic Lasers

esocid writes "Conventional electrically-powered laser diodes used in everyday consumer goods like DVD players are currently based on inorganic semiconductor materials such as gallium arsenide, gallium nitride, and related alloys. Plastic laser diodes offer the promise of covering more of the light spectrum than their counterparts, from near ultraviolet to the near infrared. Yet despite over a decade of research worldwide, plastic laser diodes have not yet been demonstrated because there haven't been any plastics that could sustain a large enough current while also supporting the efficient light emission needed to produce a laser beam. Now researchers at Imperial College London, publishing their findings in Nature Materials in April, are studying a plastic related to PFO (polydioctylfluorene), a blue-light emitting material; by making subtle changes in the plastic's chemical structure they have produced a material that transports charges 200 times better than before, while actually increasing its ability to emit light efficiently."

54 comments

  1. Great! by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, all we need is a breakthrough with plastic sharks.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn bacteria ate my plastic laser!

    2. Re:Great! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Plastic lasers with sharks on their heads?

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    3. Re:Great! by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      And when they bite they shoot lasers?

    4. Re:Great! by Hasmanean · · Score: 1

      Yah, nothing speaks class like an evil lair decorated with plastic plants and plastic sharks.

      In fact, plastic gives the impression that it's not quite evil yet, a bit more of a nuisance lair.

      Hasan

      --
      Hasan
  2. What about chromatically accurate displays? by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How tunable would these emitters be? Are they suitable as general light emitting components, rather than "just" lasers? Would it be possible to create displays where the color of a pixel was actually changed in real time?

    1. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by argent · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder how you think pixels change color now?

      Pixels don't actually "change color" now. The individual pixels in your display change the relative brightness of three sub-pixel elements, but the frequency of each element emits doesn't change... the relative proportions of three fixed colors change. This is of course an approximation an approximation that is usually good enough to fool the eye, which means it's good enough for most purposes, but it's not chromatically accurate and there are applications where that matters.

    2. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm. You might be able to get away with tuning using some kind of piezo stack, varying the size of the cavity.
      I'm not sure why you'd want to - lasers have a narrowband emission; better would be to find some chemical structures that replicate (in bulk emission properties) the response of the sensors of the eye.

    3. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by lixee · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are tunable in the sense that chemists can play around with them in order to change the bandgap (from Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital to Highest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital), thus changing the wavelength produced.

      I don't know what you mean by changing the color "in real time", but it seems to me that you're talking about electrochemical display devices. They're ridiculously simple to build and can cover a wide range of contrasts. Granted, PEDOT:PSS or similar materials can only go from transparent to dark blue (through a lot of shades of blue), and switching time is quite slow, but let's not forget that this field is at its infancy. Hang around, organic electronics might be huge in the medium term.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    4. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No this is not true.
      They are directly tuneable - as a broad gain medium, you can just change the cavity to _tune_ (literally!) the frequency of light produced by varying the modes which can be supported by the cavity.
      The chemistry will vary the range over which you can do this, though polyfluorene already has a nice fat response up in the blue.

      This is exactly the same as an optically pumped dye laser, as often used for research in the 1980s, but these required jets of the nasty stuff getting flung around and were strictly research lab objects.

    5. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chromatically accurate displays are not necessarily used for direct use by the human eye. Consider the article a few months back about what it took to get chromatically accurate white light from arrays of LEDs for illuminating pictures in a gallery.

    6. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      I often use a fusion source that emits light at 6504K. It's not very portable though.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    7. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by argent · · Score: 1

      See, that's what we need to find out. Do people want fire that can be fitted nasally?

    8. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I had the maturity and self-control you have to reply in as steady, polite and non-condescending way to someone who belligerently says something that is obviously wrong.

      Well done, I nominate you to be my representative in the Slashdot Congress.

      --
      I hate printers.
    9. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      When you're playing with the big boys, reliability trumps portability, every day.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    10. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding me?

      Damn thing's down 12 hours out of every 24. One day I'll have a look inside the case. I bet there's a Microsoft logo in there somewhere.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    11. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      All right Mr. Wiseguy, you're so clever, you tell us what colour it should be.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital?

    13. Re:What about chromatically accurate displays? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well I'm still waiting for someone to clean my telephone....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  3. plastics make it possible by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    to post redundantly about sharks on slashdot!

    --
    sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    1. Re:plastics make it possible by psued0ch · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can prove this. I am posting with a plastic keyboard.

    2. Re:plastics make it possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a metal keyboard, you insensitive clod!

      *clods 1200431 insensitive with his metal keyboard*

  4. Awsome by Peter_The_Linux_Nerd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool, the US government has worked out another piece of technology from the Roswell crash.

    1. Re:Awsome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No; a Japanese chemical company (Sumitomo) and a British University.

    2. Re:Awsome by Peter_The_Linux_Nerd · · Score: 1

      No; a Japanese chemical company (Sumitomo) and a British University. I was kidding.
    3. Re:Awsome by kcbanner · · Score: 1

      Cover story!! They only let one conspiracy photographer into the event and all he got pictures of was the Loch Ness monster

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  5. Original paper, and laser wavelength tunability by compumike · · Score: 5, Informative

    The original article is here here.

    Something cool is that while traditional semiconductor lasers have an output wavelength that is very much controlled by the bandgap energy of the material, here the laser is substantially tunable by adjusting the plastic's thickness. (Of course, this is just adjusting the energy states too, but it seems more tunable.) From the paper, "Tuning the film thickness (45-160 nm) enabled access to lasing wavelengths across a 45 nm spectral window (434-479 nm)."

    While it's not real-time electrical tuning over that kind of bandwidth, it's still pretty cool. Tunability is especially useful for detectors of various chemicals, and now this is getting into the wavelength range where more biological substances start to have their spectrographic signatures.

    --
    Electronics kits for the digital generation!

    1. Re:Original paper, and laser wavelength tunability by Liz99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately, you have to be a subscriber to have access to the article. I'd be interested in seeing it at some point.

  6. A step in the right direction by MLCT · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is moving in the right direction.

    The holy grail is an electrically pumped organic laser. Varying the co-polymer ratios has improved electron mobilities, but they still have many orders of magnitudes to go before they would get into the likely energy densities required for lasing.

    People are attacking it from multiple ends. Bradley's group have gone at it by taking an efficient light emitter and attempting to improve its pitiful charge mobilities. Others have taken very good charge carrying organic materials, LETs (light emitting transistors) and attempted to improve their pitiful light emission. (paper)

  7. Article begins with "Imperial researchers"... by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

    Did Vader just make the breakthrough he needed to construct the Death Star laser?

  8. Sure.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But was it invented by a teenager?

  9. Plastic Lasers .... by brunokummel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now my LEGO Gun will be complete!
    MWAHAHAHAH!

    --
    What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
  10. Would by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    Would they be called 'plasers'?

    1. Re:Would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would they be called 'plasers'? Avec plaisir!
    2. Re:Would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!

      For instance, a maser is Microwave Amplification through Stimulated Emission of Radiation. The M is for microwave, the L for light; that's where it all started. The word laser became so commonly known that all types of lasers throughout the spectrum are simply known by that name today. Otherwise there'd be uvasers (UV), ifasers (infrared), xasers (x-rays), etc. No spectrum abbreviations are PL, to my knowledge.

      So, you'd be breaking an established naming convention by using an abbreviation for plastic, instead of part of the spectrum. Hell hath no fury like name geeks... That guy who tried using the name ifaser, had his guts torn out by apple fanboys and he was following the convention.

  11. We can EASILY defeat your meagre Plastic Lasers... by JoshDM · · Score: 5, Funny
  12. This will produce easier to read bombs by LM741N · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, every bomb has an LED readout that counts down the minutes and seconds. I saw it on TV. Even nukes have them.

  13. My shark ate your bacteria by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 1

    well?

  14. Wikipedia article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. Two words... by naoursla · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shortly after earning my bachelors degree from an unnamed college in the Northest, one of my parent's friends took me aside at a party and gave me a recommendation for a successful career. His advice consisted of two words: plastic lasers.

    I didn't listen to him then but I believe him now.

    Also, I slept with his wife.

    1. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was his wife like?

    2. Re:Two words... by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, very much like your mother.

    3. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Necromancy? I didn't think you cared that much!

  16. I daresay so! by benhattman · · Score: 1

    This is moving in the right direction. Organic lasers are clearly the correct direction. In time, humanity will finally reach its ultimate goal; that of genetically engineering itself to grow lasers at several strategically chosen body parts. And no, I'm not referring to eye lasers. ;)
    1. Re:I daresay so! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      uhh... Fembots? (keeping with the theme).

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  17. Re:The big question, to me, is... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    can I install these plastic lasers in my new, cutting-edge Jew-repeller?


    I think the way you choose to talk will repel people (or grown-ups, at least) just fine.
  18. RE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she was also plastic

  19. Compounds, not alloys by schoschie · · Score: 1

    Btw, gallium arsenide and gallium nitride are not alloys; they're inorganic compounds. An alloy is a mixture of two or more metals. There is a fundamental difference. /wisecrack

  20. Save the comma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like people nowadays aren't even mindful enough to put the comma in when writing about Imperial College, London.