You know that using nuclear weapons against an Earth-bound object will fail, why bother using it as a backup plan?
It is not at all practical or possible to construct a spacecraft with capabilities to land on an asteroid, somehow reverse it's engines, and have enough power to move the asteroid.
It could just be due to the fact that UPnP is ubiqitous and users experience difficulties with it when you consider the thousands of available devices and peripherals that are used with the technology. Similar to the topic issue.
Digital hardware was much more reliable in the days of analog tapes. Not to mention the formatting conflicts and licensing that will ensue over who has the right to store what digital work. A single, globally recognized protocol for storing large digital packets of information would be nice...
It already has. If you look out a little farther, you shall see that most facets of the Internet in America have been locked down and regulated by capitalist ISPs. In order for the civilian population to regain total control of their sector of online communication, they will have to dismantle the ISP corporations, something as difficult as dismantling a major television broadcasting corporation.
You must understand that if astronomers can determine the atomic value of a speck of matter millions of light years away, then I have full faith in them being able to analyze the behavioral patterns of a planet's geosphere.
The RIAA is a cornered beast that is under increasing scrutiny, of course it will react like this in response to a federal case. Not to mention it is a profit-hungry corporation just like all the rest.
Even though it is not a good thing, the close ties between large corporations and the federal government mean that Windows is used as the default OS for the majority of government systems. The same goes as to why they chose McAfee software. It would be nice to have the American government and databanks use secure, UNIX based systems and open source encryption, but it's just not going to happen. Our government follows the money.
Most programs during that time period were only mathematical equations that in the most complex forms sometimes didn't reach 1 KB. To have storage the size of 4.4 MB was almost unheard of, and was the dream of universities and labs that required automation of formulas. It really does make one appreciate that $20 memory stick that we all take for granted to keep our files for work/college. One gigabyte on a keychain would amaze the computer engineers of the post-WW2 era. I never ceases to astound me how fast computing has evolved.
It has been economically and historically proven that giving aid, no matter in the form of food, technology, or money to Africa has had very mixed results. Some of the time, the intended purpose of feeding and empowering citizens is feasible, but most of the time, dictators and village warlords that are in charge of retaining dialogue with the UN and other aid organizations will add strings to many deals. It certainly can be argued that 1 free laptop per child is an almost utopian vision for education in Africa, but there will always be some who will try to corrupt what is an honest and planned effort by the West. Hell, even the DoD could argue that the laptops could be modified by militas into missile guidance systems, which has been a concern regarding powerful, mobile computers. Bottom line, this could easily fail as much as monetary aid has in recent years. It's a shame that aid to Africa has been capitalized and put on so many agendas so that it becomes a matter of prestige, rather than simple human generosity.
We all make mistakes, but surgeons today should have enough skill to ensure that objects are not left in the body in the first place. It seems like another scenario where use of advanced technology replaces basic skills that a human should have in these situations.
I would expect the fishing industry to care more about their shrinking profits that are already compromised due to pollution and overfishing. Even if this technology was proven to be safe and effective, it doesn't seem as if they would care.
Slashdot Mirror
You know that using nuclear weapons against an Earth-bound object will fail, why bother using it as a backup plan?
It is not at all practical or possible to construct a spacecraft with capabilities to land on an asteroid, somehow reverse it's engines, and have enough power to move the asteroid.
It could just be due to the fact that UPnP is ubiqitous and users experience difficulties with it when you consider the thousands of available devices and peripherals that are used with the technology. Similar to the topic issue.
We are already past that stage, chronologically and comparatively.
I can prove this. I am posting with a plastic keyboard.
For the record, the Department Of Defense had made backup plans to use this substance against the Serbs in 1994.
You know, at least be thankful that you are even able to use aerial transportation.
Digital hardware was much more reliable in the days of analog tapes. Not to mention the formatting conflicts and licensing that will ensue over who has the right to store what digital work. A single, globally recognized protocol for storing large digital packets of information would be nice...
It already has. If you look out a little farther, you shall see that most facets of the Internet in America have been locked down and regulated by capitalist ISPs. In order for the civilian population to regain total control of their sector of online communication, they will have to dismantle the ISP corporations, something as difficult as dismantling a major television broadcasting corporation.
You must understand that if astronomers can determine the atomic value of a speck of matter millions of light years away, then I have full faith in them being able to analyze the behavioral patterns of a planet's geosphere.
The RIAA is a cornered beast that is under increasing scrutiny, of course it will react like this in response to a federal case. Not to mention it is a profit-hungry corporation just like all the rest.
Even though it is not a good thing, the close ties between large corporations and the federal government mean that Windows is used as the default OS for the majority of government systems. The same goes as to why they chose McAfee software. It would be nice to have the American government and databanks use secure, UNIX based systems and open source encryption, but it's just not going to happen. Our government follows the money.
Most programs during that time period were only mathematical equations that in the most complex forms sometimes didn't reach 1 KB. To have storage the size of 4.4 MB was almost unheard of, and was the dream of universities and labs that required automation of formulas. It really does make one appreciate that $20 memory stick that we all take for granted to keep our files for work/college. One gigabyte on a keychain would amaze the computer engineers of the post-WW2 era. I never ceases to astound me how fast computing has evolved.
It has been economically and historically proven that giving aid, no matter in the form of food, technology, or money to Africa has had very mixed results. Some of the time, the intended purpose of feeding and empowering citizens is feasible, but most of the time, dictators and village warlords that are in charge of retaining dialogue with the UN and other aid organizations will add strings to many deals. It certainly can be argued that 1 free laptop per child is an almost utopian vision for education in Africa, but there will always be some who will try to corrupt what is an honest and planned effort by the West. Hell, even the DoD could argue that the laptops could be modified by militas into missile guidance systems, which has been a concern regarding powerful, mobile computers. Bottom line, this could easily fail as much as monetary aid has in recent years. It's a shame that aid to Africa has been capitalized and put on so many agendas so that it becomes a matter of prestige, rather than simple human generosity.
We all make mistakes, but surgeons today should have enough skill to ensure that objects are not left in the body in the first place. It seems like another scenario where use of advanced technology replaces basic skills that a human should have in these situations.
I would expect the fishing industry to care more about their shrinking profits that are already compromised due to pollution and overfishing. Even if this technology was proven to be safe and effective, it doesn't seem as if they would care.