Slashdot Mirror
The Smartest Browser and OS
The IQ League maintain a "60 Second IQ Test" online. Interestingly, they correlate the results of this test with a number of statistics available from their server logs. Along with the geographical distinctions like city and country, the referrer and OS/Browser user-agent strings are also mined, to determine the Smartest Browser and OS. Cutting to the chase, the very smartest is Firefox on Unknown (which internal evidence suggests is MacOS-Intel), and the dumbest, as of this writing, is IE on WinNT. Quick! Test out and move the bars on the pretty graph! Can we make Slashdot.org the "Smartest Website in the World?" (It's currently number 2 behind ScienceBlogs.com.)
Since when do IQ tests contain questions about the bible, dinosaurs, etc?
Not that I'm disappointed that I did so badly or anything...
Is there any way this is not going to turn into a flamewar and/or an excuse to bash IE?
Come on, guys, we know it sucks. Let's have some news already.
Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
How does knowing facts about the Beatles (2/10 questions) have anything to do with IQ?
You are #5971 Smartest Human in the World
Oh well, it's at least lower than my slashdot-id.
I've received the perfect score. =)
http://www.iqleague.com/certificate/n9LjytSYn0y5JZqoAVDafg
they'll tell you that you're not very intelligent and that they can fix you.
Oh wait, that's Scientology.
How we know is more important than what we know.
/. has dropped to number 11
Guess no one took into account the large sector of (insert field) managers that read slashdot.
Whoever wrote this "IQ" test is apparently not smart enough to understand how an IQ test works.
You can debate whether a real IQ test measures anything other than the ability to do well on IQ tests, however, real IQ tests don't depend on real world knowledge. That's the whole point of them. By my measure, 8 of the 10 questions it gave me are not even remotely worthy of being on an IQ test. For instance, knowing the date of the first olympiad is pretty much the definition of a question requiring real world knowledge.
The cake is a pie
I'm sorry, but anyone who can't manage to put x-y axes on their plots isn't fit to analyze the intelligence of others.
That is odd though, I have installed Firefox on many computers when I have done technical work, and most if not all still use IE as their primary browser usually filling it back up with spyware for me to remove again... About the only ways I know how to make people use Firefox is either A) switch Firefox to an IE icon, or B) delete all evidence of IE except for the .EXEs hidden in system folders. I highly, highly doubt that most Windows users using Safari are just the iTunes users, now, I would expect most of the downloads of Safari for Windows to have come from iTunes but downloads usually don't equal use of the browser.
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
What a load of rot. I didn't read any questions and just did some random clicking. 85.26% is WAY higher than my IQ.
Apparently, Perl's PRNG is the 6883rd smartest human on earth with an IQ of 101.36. Why do people pay attention to tests like this again?
Er... nice for the non-Christians and non-Jews in the crowd:
"Genesis is the first book of the Bible. Which of the following is the second book? (a) Genesis (b) Kings (c) Exodus (d) Numbers"
Uh, surely a proper intelligence measuring question would be:
"Which of the following books is not a work of fiction? (a) Genesis (b) Kings (c) Exodus (d) Origin of Species"
I looked at the questions and I think dropping to to 11th place is a good sign.
IQ test it ain't.
No sig today...
I have a mac. Safari is a decent browser, but it fails epicly compared to FF as it does not have extensibility as a primary function. It's the plugins that make firefox awesome. IE and Safari just dont even compare. (Opera? not even in the same league as IE, let alone safari)
Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
From the site:
Five teenagers are of various heights. Alex is taller than Dennis, who is shorter than Eunice. Chris is shorter than Bob, but taller than Alex. Who among them is the third tallest? [1. Chris 2. Alex 3. Dennis 4. Eunice]
To rewrite:
Alex > Dennis
Dennis < Eunice (but we don't know if Eunice is taller than Alex or not, etc)
Chris < Bob
Chris > Alex.
Smushing these together (and getting all >'s in the same direction), you get:
Bob > Chris > Alex > Dennis
Eunice > Dennis
These are the combinations I came up with that still fit the teenagers relative heights:
Bob > Chris > Alex > Eunice > Dennis
Bob > Chris > Eunice > Alex > Dennis
Bob > Eunice > Chris > Alex > Dennis
Eunice > Bob > Chris > Alex > Dennis
Who is the third tallest?
Well, Alex, Chris or Eunice. (Answers 1, 2, or 4.)
What did I miss?
[Even if I read "who is shorter than Eunice" to mean Alex < Eunice I still end up with 2 of the answers]
So extensibility is your main/only reason for choosing a browser? What about speed, ease of use, % of pages rendered OK, safety? (Yes, I use Opera)
Me too! I guess that makes us the entire opera market share.
I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
CMD+Option + on the mac gives that to you on the system level and virtual resolutions does the same under X windows. I guess it's useful under MS Windows though. I've found that Firefox will usually respond to Ctrl++ if you hit it enough times though, so I've never really found myself missing zoom on WinNT.
Actually, the timer function is apparently not working in IE with Vista (which counts as IE over NT). I get the same results if I wait a minute as if I get the answers immediately (which are pretty easy, though just in case I checked my answers were right with reliable sources). That would explain low Windows NT scores. I would actually be surprised if there was actually any significant correlation between browser use and IQ, given that most computer users use whatever someone else installed on their computers (IT, OEM or some friend). And if you think otherwise, you are probably confusing intelligent with computer savvy.
I got stuck on the first question.
It said "Who is Winnie the Pooh's depressive donkey friend?" and I spent too long looking for the "How the fuck does knowing something about British children's fiction later bastardised by Disney tell you anything about my intelligence?" option.
Sorry everyone, I should have known better than to try and answer a question with a question.
I don't therefore I'm not.
It said I live in Herndon, VA. I live in Pullman, WA. It's pretty far fom here. It also said I'm something like the 3300th smartest person in the world. Since I'm really drunk right now that's pretty sad.
You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
Assume you have a group of people of relatively moderate computer savviness. They all use IE, and you tell them all about Firefox. Some of them will say "Pssh... whatever" and conclude that IE is both adequate and familiar, making it easy to rationalize not considering a change. Others will note the benefits along with your shining recommendation and consider a switch.
If we conclude from this that the ones who blew it off think less critically (a debatable, but reasonable assumption), we will indeed see more critical thinking people using IE.
It isn't much of a leap then to say that Firefox users are in some way "smarter" than IE users.
If you can't say that, you can at least say that they're more likely to give a hoot about the test and try harder than the others.
My preferred name is frazz, but someone keeps taking it. If you see him, tell him I said hi.
You should charge. Otherwise there's no consequence for being stupid and no incentive to not be stupid.
Real IQ tests should be language independent.
Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
If they have an IE-only site (like Netflix Watch-Now) I set the homepage on IE to Netflix, and the homepage on Firefox to whatever their homepage was. I tell them "The orange fox is the internet, the blue E is Netflix." Works fine.