Slashdot Mirror


Mars Probe Brings the "Weather Rock" New Respect

radioweather writes "What looked to casual observers like a malfunction, a dangling wire with something on the end, seen in the first photo of the meteorological mast on NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander, actually turned out to be the real instrument. Surprisingly, it is much like the novelty 'weather rock' seen as a novelty gag around the world. The instrument called the 'Telltale' is described as a 'passive wind indicator' and uses an extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber. Images taken of the instrument will show the deflection of the Telltale due to the Martian wind."

144 comments

  1. I have this rock by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    It picks winner of any sports game, series, etc., everytime, in advance.

    Yours for only 5 easy payments of $19.95!

    The Sports Bookie Rock.

    Get yours now!

    1. Re:I have this rock by iago-vL · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does it keep lions away? Because I have one that does, and it's currently working at 100% capacity.

  2. AOD by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fascinating. This may be the first time 'angle of dangle' could be used in an actual scientific context.

    1. Re:AOD by Ngarrang · · Score: 1, Troll

      Sir, I bow to you and your most insightful and astute observation. If only I had a +10 funny/insightful mod to throw your way. Truly classic.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    2. Re:AOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'The angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the meat.'

    3. Re:AOD by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they'll need some kind of thermal metric to accurately calculate the heat of the meat. Or perhaps they'll just calculate it, since they're inversely proportional.

    4. Re:AOD by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      It's nice to know the classics are still appreciated on Slashdot. :)

    5. Re:AOD by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      What the?! I was complimenting the gp...Troll? Someone needs to re-read what troll actually is.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    6. Re:AOD by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Why do people assume they get to assign the numerical value for moderations? You get to pick the description, the numbers are up to *ME*. Every slashdot user (me) can weight moderations for themselves, completely outside the control of the moderator (you). If you gave him five Funny and five Insightful, that would be a total moderation of -10 because I weight funny as -3 and insightful as +1.

  3. Don't you hate it when... by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't you hate it when... Simple makes sense?

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    1. Re:Don't you hate it when... by krog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The windsock is pretty tough to beat.

    2. Re:Don't you hate it when... by magarity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hate it? Not at all. I love it when a government financed project provides simple yet effective solution.

    3. Re:Don't you hate it when... by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your $1 version would undoubtedly not survive the trip to and landing on Mars and be counted on to work without further human intervention.

      Believe it or not, building devices to be transported to and function on other planets does take a fair bit of work.

    4. Re:Don't you hate it when... by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's true. You could build it for $1.

      Now, step two: Get it to Mars.

    5. Re:Don't you hate it when... by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the one that you and I could have built for less than one dollar would not have survived launch, let alone deep space or landing. Government is not automatically and always wasteful. It is not insightful to claim it is. Pointing out specifically when government is wasteful is a good thing, but you are just assuming here, and I seriously doubt you are correct that the average slashdotter could have built a replacement that would have worked for less money than was actually spent.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Don't you hate it when... by joe-rogan · · Score: 1

      That's true. You could build it for $1. Now, step two: Get it to Mars. lollollol amazing point step 1- 1$ step 2- 5,000,000$ epic failure- priceless
    7. Re:Don't you hate it when... by SQLGuru · · Score: 0

      From the summary: extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber

      Ok, so the Kapton tubing is about $1 per inch, so the price is a little more than $1, but still
      http://www.smallparts.com/products/descriptions/swpt-twpt.cfm

      The Kevlar fiber shouldn't be too bad since you can get 72" boot laces for about $3.50
      http://www.duluthtrading.com/KV72.aspx?src=T28WFSHP1

      So, for less than $20, I can make a "Mars Weather Indicator".......

      Step 1: Buy raw materials
      Step 2: Assemble weather indicator
      Step 3: Sell for $25 each
      Step 4: Profit

      Layne

    8. Re:Don't you hate it when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just like ebay... $1 wind measuring device. $5,000,000 shipping fee.

    9. Re:Don't you hate it when... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you $25,000,000 that it would.

      Since you are the one challenging, you launch it.

      Seriously, the $1.00 version would work, but it would not have the sensitivity to gain more information from it than the one on the lander. Martian air pressure is far lower so the rock on a string needs to be way more sensitive to winds that we would consider as a incredibly light breeze.

      Martian sand storms with winds RAGING at 50mph would only feel like a stiff breeze to a human's skin. Because the atmosphere density is so low.

      So yes a $1.00 piece of kevlar string with a single light bead on the end WOULD work on mars if attached to a lander. but it will deliver less information, therefore the "over-engineered" rock on a string was designed to give the most information, without causing erroneous readings.

      That is the hard part. making something to use on another planet or space is not. (within reason)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Don't you hate it when... by spun · · Score: 1

      Way to miss the point. Show me how much was actually spent on this device, or shut up about "wasteful government."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:Don't you hate it when... by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ack, I thought you said WINSOCK and was about to disagree strongly.

    12. Re:Don't you hate it when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's was cheap to make $1.00 US  (ahhh, make that 0.75 cents based US dollar devaluation).
      However, it cost $399.99+ million to get it there and no refunds accepted!

    13. Re:Don't you hate it when... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the government spent thousands of dollars on something that you or I could build for less than 1....... The instrument was built and paid for by the University of Aarhus in Denmark.
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    14. Re:Don't you hate it when... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1
      /me Removes baseball bat from the remais of krog's skull


      Wait a minutes, so he DIDN'T say WinSock? Ahhh shit I might be in trouble here.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    15. Re:Don't you hate it when... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the government spent thousands of dollars on something that you or I could build for less than 1.......

      Either you shit kevlar and can propose, justify, design, refine, build and test a device in five minutes (I'm assuming McDonalds wages for you, but the real engineers and scientists get paid a lot more), or it's not kevlar that comes out of your ass, but your Slashdot posts.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    16. Re:Don't you hate it when... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the life support system for the blackjack and hookers!

      Then again, maybe we don't need to send it to mars...

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    17. Re:Don't you hate it when... by eyal0 · · Score: 1

      This is common at the beach. Before you head out surfing or sailing you want to know the size, direction and shape of the waves on the beach. No machine will measure how sloppy the break is, so the easiest solution is a webcam aimed at the water.

      Once you've already got a webcam, putting a windsock on a pole in the water in view of the camera is often as good or better than an electronic anemometer. The electronics often corrode in the salty air, the anemometer often needs oiling, and you can't post it 20 yards offshore unless it's wireless and you want to be replacing batteries all the time. And then it's going to get stolen or broken. Or corrode first.

      In my experience, the odds that the anemometer that you need at any given moment is running and accurate when you need it is about 50%. Sometimes the old ways are the best ways.

    18. Re:Don't you hate it when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we first gazed at the moon through powerful telescopes, the moon appeared to be full of dirt and rocks. However, we were not convinced so we sent astronauts there. They brought back samples for scientists to analyze and it was confirmed that indeed, this was just dirt and rocks. However, we were not convinced so we went to the moon another dozen times or so just to really be sure it was real dirt and real rocks.

      When we first gazed at Mars through powerful telescopes it appeared to be a mysterious planet. Our early flybys of this planet revealed a terrain full of dirt and rocks. However, we were not convinced so we sent Rover there. The little robotic vehicle traversed the topography sending back pictures and data and guess what? - more dirt and rocks. However, we were not convinced so we sent Phoenix there. It landed safely and started analyzing the soil and sending beautifully detailed images of a Martian landscape full of ⦠dirt and rocks.

      But wait, this is different. The Phoenix landed in the North Pole area in the hopes of discovering life. Its little sensors microscopically scrutinized the soil and made an amazing discovery. Mars is still full of dirt and rocks. But wait, this is different. The dirt has a pattern to it.

    19. Re:Don't you hate it when... by spun · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are an idiot. You don't understand how science works.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  4. Is there life on mars.... by Joe_kools · · Score: 2, Funny

    Simon and Garfunkle fans think.. The answer my friend is blowing in the wind...

    1. Re:Is there life on mars.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe that was Bob Dylan...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    2. Re:Is there life on mars.... by hcpxvi · · Score: 1

      Of course it was. Although everyone with an acoustic guitar in the late '60s did a cover version of it, so that may well include Simon and Garfunkel.

    3. Re:Is there life on mars.... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Except in New Jersey, where what's blowing in the wind smells funny.

    4. Re:Is there life on mars.... by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Err... I'm almost ashamed to admit that I have the complete works of Simon and Garfunkel (3CD set, literal transcriptions of every LP they released, 2 per disc), and that one isn't on it.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    5. Re:Is there life on mars.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kiss her where it smells--Take her to Jersey!

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    6. Re:Is there life on mars.... by flyingsquid · · Score: 0, Troll
      I believe that was Bob Dylan...

      Another Dylan line goes, "You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows". (Subterranean Homesick Blues)

    7. Re:Is there life on mars.... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Mars isn't Kansas, but I'm pretty sure there's Dust in the Wind.

    8. Re:Is there life on mars.... by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Written by. Peter Paul and Mary did the version that I usually hear on the radio.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    9. Re:Is there life on mars.... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      In Kansas, it's just dust in the wind.

    10. Re:Is there life on mars.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows."
      -Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues

  5. New-old fashioned "Science" by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wonder if they included some good old fashioned Dowsing Rods to find water too?

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:New-old fashioned "Science" by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My uncle doesn't need rods, sticks or wires to find water. He just holds out his hands and witches it. Talking to a civil engineer in New Mexico, am amazed how many business still do water searches this way.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:New-old fashioned "Science" by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I don't either.

      I go to the tap and turn it on.

      It's like magic.

      No, really, to most of the world throughout history, it really is like magic.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    3. Re:New-old fashioned "Science" by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      When it came time to drill a well on my property, he thought it was weird I picked up some geo survey charts and looked at where nearby wells were located. Figured out there was a bunch of decent wells in a line that matched an underground fault and we hit water first try, with a depth right in line with the other wells. It was like magic!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  6. Why not a weather vane? by Robert1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why didn't they put in a lightweight weather vane with a small fan? That way they could tell direction and velocity. With the rock you can basically gauge the initial wind, but once it starts swinging in the opposite direction its practically impossible to tell if the deflection is from an opposing wind or merely the pendulum swinging. It becomes even more useless if there are sudden changes in wind speed/direction since it will just seemingly bounce round in random directions none of which are reflective of the actual wind direction or velocity.

    I don't see how this is any better than a weather vane, cheaper, or smaller. It sure is way more useless.

    1. Re:Why not a weather vane? by desenz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It definitely wins in the durability department. Dust is a real problem on mars, so wherever that weather vane pivots would have to be sealed up pretty tight.

    2. Re:Why not a weather vane? by TheRedSeven · · Score: 3, Interesting
      From TFA:

      The Telltale consists of a gallows that is mounted on the top of the Meteorological Mast of the Lander. The active element of the instrument is an extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fibres. Images taken of the instrument will show the deflection of the Telltale due to the wind. A mirror is mounted below the active part to enable better direction information. (My emphasis)
      The wonderful addition of a high-tech "mirror" allows multiple perspectives that would allow you to detect direction. Looks like some overpaid engineer already thought of this.

      When you're sending something into orbit or further, payload weight is a concern. Cutting weight, moving parts, and simplifying things is generally a good idea on this sort of thing.
    3. Re:Why not a weather vane? by hcpxvi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Remember that the surface air pressure on Mars is very small compared to on Earth. So you need a much lighter and more delicate instrument for the air to be able to move it. Anything resembling a traditional weather vane would probably not respond to the tenuous Martian breezes. Even if it worked at first, it might well get stuck after the first of those Martian dust storms blew dust into its pivot. Disclaimer: Yes I am a meteorologist. No, I have not been to Mars or worked on any instrument that went there.

    4. Re:Why not a weather vane? by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      A weather vane requires a free moving bearing or bushing which would not do well in a dusty/gritty environment like Mars.

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    5. Re:Why not a weather vane? by MosesJones · · Score: 1

      Two reasons

      1) Reliability, there is bugger all that can go wrong with a tell tale
      2) Weight, a vane and a fan are going weigh grams more than the tell tale and when sending something to Mars those things count.

      Personally I love this sort of engineering you can almost imagine the meeting

      "We've got 5 grams and we need to tell where the wind is coming from"
      "Weather, vane with a fan?"
      "Nope to heavy"
      "Hang on how about just something hanging down from a stick"

      And thus extensive engineering and testing was born (it is worth reading the page linked above on what they had to do).

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    6. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, the rock can tell you if it is raining outside, foggy, and cold...all from the rocks tactile interface...

      raining, rock is wet
      foggy, hard to see the rock
      cold, rock has ice on it...

    7. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Smelly+Jeffrey · · Score: 1

      And if the rock is missing...

      Tornado!

    8. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Robert1 · · Score: 1

      I think you're wrong on the first point. I feel like it wouldn't be that hard to make a very very lightweight weathervane, maybe even made of foil. I do think you're spot on with your second point though, the pivot would seem to be the limiting factor.

      Thanks for answering the question.

    9. Re:Why not a weather vane? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      No, I have not been to Mars or worked on any instrument that went there.


      Thanks for clearing that up. I was wondering. :-)
      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    10. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I read Slashdot, so I can find innovative and workable solutions that were dreamed up after five minutes of consideration, rather than wasting time observing and learning about the decades-long efforts of a bunch of idiot engineers who have no friggin idea how to design, launch, navigate, land, and operate an interplanetary exploration robot.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    11. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Great, Now make your nice lightweight fragile weathervane survive 9g's of reentry and almost that amount on launch, plus numerous bumps at various times in the mission.

      Touchdown on the Mars Surface was 5 miles an hour. How hard could it be. Now, crash your Toyota into a wall at 5 MPH and you might find that the 5 MPH bumpers really only work at 4.95 MPH. Oops.

      It's easy to make a lightweight weathervane. It's hard to make a lightweight weathervane, get it to Mars, and still have it in working order.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    12. Re:Why not a weather vane? by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, no:
       
      If the rock is missing: Martians

    13. Re:Why not a weather vane? by pz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Design choices:

      (a) tell tale: simple; robust to launching forces; reliable; lightweight; works well as long as winds are relatively constant; works poorly if winds are turbulent; gives wind speed AND direction

      (b) weather vane: has moving parts including bearings that require protection from the elements; delicate structure that needs to be made robust to launching forces; heavier than tell tale; works well in any winds, although the mass of vane averages, and therefore can mask, turbulence; unless paired with anemometer (those spinning things), only gives wind direction

      I'm betting that the fine engineers at NASA who are working within parameters like keeping weight down to absolute minimum, not being able to repair anything at Mars, wanting something that might potentially work for years to come, and not knowing what the range of winds they might encounter would be making a pretty good decision in selecting a tell tale style design.

      But what do I know? I'm just a guy who was at Caltech for graduate school and knew people who worked at JPL.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    14. Re:Why not a weather vane? by pz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The kapton tube does not swing in response to wind, it just deflects. The stronger the wind, the more it deflects. Imagine that it's a spring. Ever seen a car's radio antenna flex on the highway? Same idea.

      Insects use exactly the same sort of mechanism to detect gentle air movements. This is one reason it's so hard to catch a fly with your hand when the fly has landed somewhere: the air currents generated by your comparatively large and slow-moving hand are easily detected by the fly.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    15. Re:Why not a weather vane? by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why didn't they put in a lightweight weather vane with a small fan? Actually a vane and fan is inferior for this particular purpose. This "rock on a string" can be used to determine both direction and intensity of winds just as well, plus it is lighter and mechanically less complex than a vane and fan--important in the very cold and dusty environment on Mars. The rotating parts would more easily wear, freeze or seize up more easily in such an environment.

      With the rock you can basically gauge the initial wind, but once it starts swinging If a wind is sustained the rock would not swing. Furthermore sensors and computer analysis of the motion can provide more information than you would think. Without restricted degrees of movement this instrument can determine wind directions on different planes (vs just one with a weather vane) and the swinging can be used to figure out the size and direction of gusts, and could even detect "eddies" or small tornadoes, updrafts, etc. Can't do that as well with a weather vane.
    16. Re:Why not a weather vane? by mazarin5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      but once it starts swinging in the opposite direction its practically impossible to tell if the deflection is from an opposing wind or merely the pendulum swinging. Because the motion of a simple pendulum is one of the last great unsolved problems in physics?
      --
      Fnord.
    17. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, changes in the amplitude and direction of a simple pendulum [aka weather rock] can tell you more than you ever wanted to know about wind dynamics. Check a physics I book...
      brutus inquisitor.

    18. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how thin the atmosphere is, a fan and vane may not be sensitive enough. Perhaps not enough q-bar to overcome the friction in bearings?

    19. Re:Why not a weather vane? by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      they're called fines and gets into all our equipment, even in the pressure domes you need eye drops and you can just taste the dust. Once the next few water-heavy asteroids come in, the pressure will raise and hopefully the fines will bind to the water vapor volume and form clouds eliminating part of the problem.

    20. Re:Why not a weather vane? by dargaud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder why they don't use a sonic anemometer: precise, works in any conditions and at any wind speed, no mechanical parts and it can take fast readings several times per second to measure turbulence. Yes, I've operated one in Antarctica.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    21. Re:Why not a weather vane? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because a sonic sonic anemometer requires power, calibration, and computer cycles. A windsock doesn't.

    22. Re:Why not a weather vane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a wind is sustained the rock would not swing.

      And hystersis in the kapton may dampen out any swinging anyways, depending how they actually designed it.

    23. Re:Why not a weather vane? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Because the motion of a simple pendulum is one of the last great unsolved problems in physics?

      Instead of physics here you can use the dark mysteries of the Foucault :)

    24. Re:Why not a weather vane? by ah.clem · · Score: 1

      Nice, very clever. Unfortunately, much too subtle for the mods.

      ah.clem

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
  7. PR Spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice save, NASA.

  8. It's called a 'wind sock' by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

    And they already had enough respect as a simple form of wind indicator. You may have seen one at an airport, for example. It's not a weather rock.

    See, the point, or "joke" as it were, of the weather rock is that it can't actually tell you anything you wouldn't have already known due to your own senses. "If it's wet it's raining, white it's snowing, bouncing and there's an earthquake." But you could tell all those things without the rock... get it?

    A wind sock isn't very sophisticated, but it tells us things that wouldn't have been as apparent without it.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:It's called a 'wind sock' by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're calling it a telltale, which from the description sounds more accurate than windsock, as a telltale is not hollow. Telltales (usually thin strips of nylon, sometimes on smaller yachts just bits of string) are used on the leading and trailing edges of sails to indicate the flow of air over and off the sail.

    2. Re:It's called a 'wind sock' by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      They're calling it a telltale, which from the description sounds more accurate than windsock, as a telltale is not hollow.

      Well they're saying it's a 'tube', which to me implied a hollow sheath of material like a wind sock. Looking at the pictures, it looks like a tube handing from a string, but it's hard to tell if it's hollow or not.

      Either way, it's an actual time-tested instrument, not a joke like the weather rock.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:It's called a 'wind sock' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When said weather rock is on mars it's slightly different though.

      You can't just stick your head out the window to see if it's windy...

    4. Re:It's called a 'wind sock' by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      A wind sock isn't very sophisticated, but it tells us things that wouldn't have been as apparent without it. To elaborate on Chris' comment: A wind sock will "inflate" about half way with about a 7 mph wind speed. It will inflate fully with a 12-15 mph wind speed. It also rotates to indicate the direction of the wind. When observed over time, it can indicate the variability of the wind. For example, is it gusty or is the wind direction frequently changing.

      Simple, but quite effective. One of the last things pilots check for when landing is the wind sock to see if we will need to prepare for a more "stimulating" landing or not.

      Bill
      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  9. This Is Science! by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, of course, they will collect both angle of dangle (azimuth) AND degree of dangle (intensity), both of which vary over time and circumstances. I just don't want to know what they are using for the low-budget ground based simulator. "No Jim, lay back down. Your shift isn't over."

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:This Is Science! by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, of course, they will collect both angle of dangle (azimuth) AND degree of dangle (intensity), both of which vary over time and circumstances.

      So NASA can finally answer the question, how's it hanging?

    2. Re:This Is Science! by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 4, Funny

      So NASA can finally answer the question, how's it hanging? Definitively, and from millions of miles away!
      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    3. Re:This Is Science! by tgd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it takes like ten minutes to find out and as we all know, in ten minutes it can be all over.

  10. Telltale's by penguinstorm · · Score: 3, Informative

    Telltales have long been used in sailing. Most sails have some visible.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tell-tale

    That they are incredibly rudimentary and primitive does not diminish their usefullness, provided they're used for what they're meant for. They're not going to predict anything, for example.

    --
    Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    1. Re:Telltale's by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2, Informative

      In case anyone is interested, a telltale in sailing is used to properly shape the sail for smooth airflow over the airfoil created by the sail, rather than for determining the direction or strength of the wind.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    2. Re:Telltale's by margam_rhino · · Score: 1

      Also on helicopters. A Telltale is put on the windscreen and you can tell if you are travelling straight forwards or are proceeding at an angle. i.e. helicopter proceeding at 12:00 and fusilage pointing at 11:58.

  11. Weather vane? by joe-rogan · · Score: 1

    I think I saw this somewhere in a textbook. I believe it was when Spain was looking for a new route somewhere... oh ya! that is in 1600's my bad. They used that to find wind I forgot, NASA=Outdated. I guess they will use Dowsing Rods.

    1. Re:Weather vane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weight is critical, so it would have to be a very light weather vane. Mars, in case you didn't notice, is more than a little dusty. They'd be stuck with a jammed weather vane pretty quickly. Why would they use a more mechanically complex device when the simple one works?
       
      What's really outdated is applying intuitive reactions to things which are outside the domain of normal human intuition. Use your brain properly and stop being an imbecile.

    2. Re:Weather vane? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      You do realize that most airports have windsocks up to help determine current conditions? Or that every single firing range out there has a flag to indicate when it's safe to fire? The people who are actually marksmen (I was, when I was in the military) use the flag as a windsock to determine weather conditions and adjust their firing.

      I'm not saying that there's going to be airports or a firing range set up on Mars. But the point is that there's modern applications for a windsock/telltale/weather vane. They're dirt cheap, and incredibly simple devices. If it breaks, you haven't really lost anything. And because there's basically no moving parts, it's a hell of a lot less likely to break than a modern instrument like an anemometer.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    3. Re:Weather vane? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Obviously NASA should use GPS to detect wind.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Weather vane? by joe-rogan · · Score: 1

      All im saying is that they could have used something that could have analyzed the data by itself than have someone, who could be doing somethng else, do the same thing.

  12. Martian weather forecasting rock by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

    Martian weather forecasting rock

    o Rock has dust on it - there has been a martian sand storm

    o Rock is swaying back and forth slighly - a martian sand storm is brewing

    o Rock cannot be seen - there is a martian sand storm

    o Rock is white - there is frozen water on Mars

    o Rock is levitating - There is a UFO with an anti-gravity beam

    o Rock is floating - Rock is in orbit around planet

    o Rock has gone - UFO has been here and removed rock

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Martian weather forecasting rock by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Bah, rock left when Elvis died.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Martian weather forecasting rock by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Funny

      o Rock has dust on it - there has been a martian sand storm

      o Rock is swaying back and forth slighly - a martian sand storm is brewing

      o Rock cannot be seen - there is a martian sand storm

      o Rock is white - there was a martian sand storm

      o Rock is levitating - caution: martian sand storm

      o Rock is floating - seriously, you guys, martian sand storm

      o Rock has gone - martian sand storm

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  13. Can't wait... by slashname3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the first manned landing with the first weather report from Mars. "Well it looks kind of windy, hold on, let me take my glove and helmet off so I can lick my finger and hold it up to get a measurement of what direction the wind is blowing...." "POOF!" "ARRRGGGGGG!"

    "Mars base, this is Houston, over"
    "Mars base, this is Houston, over"
    "Damn, I think we lost another weatherman..."

    1. Re:Can't wait... by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Like Dylan said in the 60s, "Ya don't need a Weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:Can't wait... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not if we send Quaid ahead to start the reactor.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  14. entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Occam's Razor.

  15. Obligatory by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank you for bringing us this "Telltale tale."

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  16. Beaches on Mars! by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 1

    We were at the beach Everybody had matching towels Somebody went under a dock And there they saw a rock It wasn't a rock It was a rock lobster!

  17. Phoenix Weather Forecasting Stone by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

    Condition______________________Forecast
    Stone is Wet___________________Liquid Water on Mars!
    Stone is Dry___________________Mars Still a Frozen Desert
    Shadow on Ground_______________Sunny
    White on Top___________________Well, We Did Land At The North Pole
    Can't See Stone________________Dusty, or Phoenix Broken
    Swing Stone____________________Windy
    Stone Jumping Up and Down______Marsquake
    Stone Gone_____________________Aliens

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  18. what's really happening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an extremely lightweight Kapton tube

    Behind the nearest large rock is some Alien...

    Kapton!

    Kaptoff!

    Kapton!

    The Kaptor!

  19. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To the best of my ability to read, we just spent a few million dollars so that we could learn the direction the wind was blowing. At one point. On a rock. A rock very, very far away from here. Where no humans fly, boat, or do anything else which benefits in the slightest from wind directional data.

    Except, you know, that whole "understanding the environment of Mars" which benefits quite a bit from knowing about the wind. Sure it's only one location. On the other hand, it will be the only measurement we've ever had and thus a substantial increase in knowledge. They could have spent more on more sophisticated devices, compromising the mass (and dollar) budget, if you really wanted to.

    It's hard for me to imagine how you could approve of the overall $420 million project, yet disapprove of this simple, lightweight, and relatively cheap instrument. If you're expecting anything discovered by the Phoenix to have a direct impact on sailing, boating, or any other thing we do here on earth, well, it's possible it will happen eventually, but don't hold your breath. So is it the entire concept of investigating other planets in our solar system that bothers you? Or is it really just the unsophisticated wind indicator?

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  20. Dowsing rods don't detect anything by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Informative

    A dowsing rod doesn't actually detect anything (even according to practitioners) - it is simply a device to magnify subconscious body language of the operator. The theory is that the human operator detects water via poorly understood senses below conscious awareness. Some dowsers don't bother with the rods, claiming to have trained themselves to become more aware of these senses.

    I know I "see" something like a flash of light whenever someone turns on a fluorescent light with magnetic ballast in another room - so I don't think the idea of additional senses is completely crazy.

    1. Re:Dowsing rods don't detect anything by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dowsing rods actually do an awfully good job at detecting idiots!

    2. Re:Dowsing rods don't detect anything by SpydeZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know I "see" something like a flash of light whenever someone turns on a fluorescent light with magnetic ballast in another room. And I thought I was the only one who saw light when someone turn on the lights...
    3. Re:Dowsing rods don't detect anything by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      I know I "see" something like a flash of light whenever someone turns on a fluorescent light with magnetic ballast in another room - so I don't think the idea of additional senses is completely crazy.

      I know a guy who might be willing to give you a million dollars if you can demonstrate this ability under controlled conditions.
      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    4. Re:Dowsing rods don't detect anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I "see" something like a flash of light whenever someone turns on a fluorescent light with magnetic ballast in another room
      My guess would be you have a weird synaesthetic response to the high frequency component of the noise it makes. "Electrosensitivity" has been pretty thoroughly debunked. See if it still happens when you wear ear defenders / high attenuation earplugs. DO IT FOR SCIENCE
    5. Re:Dowsing rods don't detect anything by mopower70 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geez mods! You mark a guy "Funny" who has an extra sensory experience due to the influence of a remote magnetic ballast, and then mod the oldest dowsing rod joke on the planet as "Insightful"? Not sure where you're going with that roll...

    6. Re:Dowsing rods don't detect anything by achurch · · Score: 1

      I know I "see" something like a flash of light whenever someone turns on a fluorescent light with magnetic ballast in another room - so I don't think the idea of additional senses is completely crazy.

      Actually, that'd probably just be noise from the current spike--sort of like the click you can hear from a speaker in the same circumstances.

  21. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by magarity · · Score: 1

    First you think third graders learning science is pointless busywork and then you think a $420M probe to Mars has this wind detector as its sole and only purpose? Get over your jaded self, please.

  22. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you kidding?

    On the off chance you are not: the telltale is but one tiny instrument among many others that are much more sophisticated. A freebie, if you will. The vehicle is a very complex, self-contained geological lab, including:


    + Robotic Arm
    + Robotic Arm Camera
    + Mars Descent Imager
    + Meteorological Station
    + Surface Stereo Imager
    + Microscopy, Electrochemistry, and Conductivity Analyzer

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  23. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Well, for instance, if it turns out the wind is steady and in only one direction, or varies with the seasons, that would be very useful information to have. Sure, it's one data point, but it's one data point over a long period of time, and one which can be correlated with more indirect methods to calibrate those instruments.

    The pressure is too low for more sophisticated methods, even the traditional weather vane and anemometer wouldn't overcome bearing friction except in gale force winds. It and the more exotic methods use almost an order of magnitude more mass than the system in question (the camera was already on the lander, for instance.)

    If you're going to send a $420 million lander to a remote place on mars, why not spend the extra buck and get two more pieces of information about that rock?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  24. And the latest report... by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    This just in, casual observers have seen what look like round objects that have attached themselves to the bottom of the Phoenix Lander that don't appear to be moving in any of the pictures. Scientists have confirmed that these are wheels. A simple solution used since the dawn of mankind, they are being used to move the Lander across the surface of Mars. They appear not to be moving because the camera takes pictures too quickly to observe their slow rotation speed.

  25. off topic - sending a rock by hansoloaf · · Score: 1

    figured here would be a good place to bring up

    Would it be difficult to design a small launcher that could contain scooped rocks, dirt, etc from Mars and be launched towards Earth?
    It does not have to hit Earth - it can be picked up in Space near Earth somehow and brought back in
    Just thinking out loud during a bored moment at work.

    1. Re:off topic - sending a rock by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Would it be difficult to design a small launcher that could contain scooped rocks, dirt, etc from Mars and be launched towards Earth?

      Quite difficult, but it is being planned...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:off topic - sending a rock by hansoloaf · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Thanks. Mod parent up.

    3. Re:off topic - sending a rock by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Difficulties:
      1) The biggest problem is that you have to reach Mars escape velocity using (primarily) materials brought with the lander. The energy to reach the escape velocity can be provided in several ways, but traditional methods (rockets) are not practical since the amount of fuel required would mass more than the original outbound payload. Your best bet is probably a rail gun constructed from several individual landing craft. The energy for this could be provided from the sun and batteries, and your main mass requirement for a given launch would be for the containers to hold the samples.
      2) After the mass/energy conflict of achieving escape velocity, you have to get your payload somewhere around earth. You could just reduce velocity along the circumference of Mars orbit so that the payload slowly decays inward until it reaches earch, but this could be a decades-long process and could also result in the sample being contaminated by solar radiation. So something a bit more extreme is probably required.
      3) You need a "catcher's mitt" in orbit on the earth end.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
  26. The big question is by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Will keep tigers away?

    Actually I was hoping they would have seen some condensation on it.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:The big question is by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      No man, everyone knows the big question is, "Will it blend?"

    2. Re:The big question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far I haven't seen a single tiger in any of Phoenix images. The rock seems to be doing a pretty good job of keeping tigers away. I'll keep looking, though.

  27. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Of course we'd have to wonder why we do anything on a rock at all when there are no humans there. We do not see an immediate application as a product, thus this kind of science is useless.

    Or, of course, these kinds of experiment help us understand the system that make up Mars so that at a later point we are able to actually do something with the planet - mine it, for instance. Yes, being able to predict the Martian wind is important for that; an unforseen sandstorm at the wrong time might destroy the rocket used to get the stuff into orbit.

    There is a life past next quarter and sometimes you do have to invest without knowing for certain that you wil see returns in the immediate future.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  28. Wow.... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    So they hung a string from a pole and called it a 'wind-measuring device'

    Yeah, it's great and works really well, but did they really need the 'extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber'

    How about a bit of fishline?

    No troll, why did they need something so sophisticated? The martin environment is hostile, and the string would need to be awfully light, but why wouldn't a bit of reflective fishline work? It'd hold up pretty well...

    And before I say this, let me say that I think NASA needs to be given more money; space research is important.
    But how much did they spend on this 'extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber', that looks like it could be replaced with fishline?

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Wow.... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      How about a bit of fishline?

      Ever put a match on fishline? - it burns..:

      From the Kapton manufacturers website:

      DuPont has set a high standard in the polyimide film markets with its durability and performance in extreme temperature environments.

      Use the right material for the job - remember this is rocket science.
      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Wow.... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Traditional fishing line has issues with cold. Dunno about the braided "superlines" that don't stretch... but then those are extremely thin compared to regular line....

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Wow.... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      But how much did they spend on this 'extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber', that looks like it could be replaced with fishline? The instrument was built and paid for by the University of Aarhus in Denmark. Also, I would imagine that the cost of sending things to Mars is rather high, so it could easily be worth it to spend a little more on materials to save on fuel.
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    4. Re:Wow.... by cflange · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's great and works really well, but did they really need the 'extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber'

      How about a bit of fishline?
      Many constraints guided the design of this deceivingly simple instrument.

      It had to be image-based, because by the time it was proposed, replacing a descoped hot-wire anemometer, the electronic data interfaces could not be changed anymore.
      It had to be ultra-lightweight, not only because of the very stringent mass constraints, but mainly the moving part had to show a displacement of the order of 1 mm under winds of a few m/s on Mars, which produce only about 1 microN drag force. A fish-line is much stiffer than the collection of thin kevlar fibres used, and not as strong.
      The materials have to have to have decent UV resistance, because Mars does not have an ozone layer. Nylon can become brittle in a matter of days on Mars.
      The moving parts are exposed to enormous, repeated stresses during launch and landing. Any usual material, if dimensioned to survive the trip, would be too heavy and stiff to move in the usual winds on Mars. The 8 microns thick kapton foil used for the telltale ending tube (yes, it's hollow) is extremely lightweight, yet was able survive all the beating it took during the trip without visible damage.
      The comments above refuting the adequacy of a weather vane are well stated and I don't need to add to them.

      Lange

      --
      Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?
  29. the landing by pha7boy · · Score: 1

    To me this is the most exciting thing to happen to space exploration in a very long time. We're about to get an idea of what's inside the Martian soil. We just carried out a remote landing on a different planet without using airbags to bounce around aimlessly. and we're looking to get quite a little bit of data from it.

    The most important thing to come out of this is to have a new generation of kids interested in space exploration - I mean aside from fragging aliens. I don't know about anyone else, but those first images from the lander of the Martian ground send shivers down my spine.
    --
    -- All this knowledge is giving me a raging brainer.
  30. Will iTunes Run on that Thing? by Spencerian · · Score: 1

    ...cause it took a CD up with it containing Earth's greatest hits!
    http://fawkes4.lpl.arizona.edu/images/gallery/lg_532.jpg

    Either that, or Apple's scored a deal with NASA to lock in the Martian music market...

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  31. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by trongey · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a great experiment. Please re-read the paper you linked. The telltale was selected as a budget-friendly alternative to other wind measurement instruments. It's a very simple and reliable tool that can provide valuable data. It also does the job without using the lander's valuable battery power.

    Recording wind direction and relative speed allows for some basic meteorology. With some calibration it can even provide absolute wind speed. It also can be used to determine local wind conditions before deploying other experiments that might be affected by high winds in a particular direction.

    You want the government to deliver results? It did.

    PS: Your windsocks, while maybe not of practical use to most third graders, are still used at airports around the world to provide critical wind data to pilots.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  32. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by jbezorg · · Score: 1

    From: http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/science03.php "Objective 1: Study the History of Water in All its Phases Currently, water on Mars' surface and atmosphere exists in two states: gas and solid. At the poles, the interaction between the solid water ice at and just below the surface and the gaseous water vapor in the atmosphere is believed to be critical to the weather and climate of Mars. Phoenix will be the first mission to collect meteorological data in the Martian arctic needed by scientists to accurately model Mars' past climate and predict future weather processes." So, this simple device is tracking the movement of a key element (gaseous water vapor in the atmosphere) locally. Probably to detect how fast the surface wind is moving and calculate how much water vapor it can pick up from the solid water ice below the surface. The LIDAR probably takes a broader view while the orbital takes a global view. Just a guess.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  33. Might have been cheaper by everphilski · · Score: 1

    But how much did they spend on this 'extremely lightweight Kapton tube hanging in Kevlar fiber', that looks like it could be replaced with fishline?

    Kapton and Kevlar are both used in aerospace engineering. Kevlar is often used to sheath fiber optic cables and in composites. According to Wikipedia, Kapton is used as an aerospace (electrical) insulator and plastic structural support in space. Know what? Being aerospace engineers and all, in a lab environment, they might have just had this stuff lying around, and cut a few lengths as needed. I don't know that for a fact, but chances are...

    Now compare that to the cost of sending someone out to buy fishing line (fishing line + gas + vehicle maintenance and insurance + employee time on the clock) and you tell me which is cheaper...

    1. Re:Might have been cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot the cost of testing the fishing line to measure it's physical properties (Polyimide/Kapton tubing is probably already measured), testing over temperature to see whether it breaks down or gets brittle, in a vacuum chamber to see whether it outgasses, etc.

      And then, there's the cleaning of it for planetary protection, and, of course, you have to do a bakeout to kill anything left.

      There's no such thing in NASA spacecraft as "whip on out to the hardware store"

  34. Ninety minutes does a signal need to earth by boombasticman · · Score: 1

    from mars. In imperial units that's
      about one and a half our.

  35. Marslab at University of Aarhus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aw, come on guys. It's the only thing worthwhile the danish scientists at the mars lab at the University of Aarhus contributed to the mission. I've been at their lab a couple of times to see it.

    Apparently they have one of the only wind tunnels specifically designed to simulate the Martian environment, which meant they got to make that silly wind gauge. And somewhere else in Denmark they have a special kind of dirt which can be used to simulate soil from mars. It contains a high level of iron oxides. It has magnetic properties and being a fine grain soil etc.

  36. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    K'breel, Speaker for the Council of Elders mocked the primitive meteorological technologies of the invaders from the evil blue planet at a recent audience with the free and independent press.

    "This confirms our longstanding assessment of their inferior technical capabilities. Their eventual defeat at our splors is assured."

    When asked for other examples of amusing, primitive technologies on the mechanical invader, K'breel declined comment, but instead urged that loyal Martians not forget the broken wheel on the crippled and failed attacker elsewhere on the planet.

    (With apologies to TMM).

  37. HOW DARE YOU!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOW DARE YOU QUESTION NASA'S NEEDLESS BLOAT SPENDING!!!!!

    Seriously, fuck you slashdotters who mod this guy troll when he brings up a perfectly valid point about needless wasteful spending of American tax dollars. Just because he criticizes your precious infallible science machine doesn't mean he needs to be modded troll for speaking out on the truth. NASA refused to ackknowledge the waste that is a shuttle program when there are far more cheaper and efficient ways to put people in space. Finnaly they are scraping that 50 year old technology and "moving forward" onto somthing else while the russians and chinese have free reigns on space travel. You ignorant hardheaded bastards..

  38. Re:entities should not be multiplied beyond necess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Titties however...

  39. Synaesthetic response by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    That is a good hypothesis. I have unusually sensitive hearing. I cannot use power tools without hearing protection. I cannot enjoy concerts at normal volume level. I can't stand noisy computers (give me quiet over a another Ghz any day). It will require some thought to set up a reasonably controlled experiment (e.g. me not knowing whether the switch is actually thrown).

    1. Re:Synaesthetic response by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      It's also interesting that at very low amplitudes, our ears (perhaps ear/brain combination) are much more sensitive "edge" detectors than CW detectors. For example, you can usually hear very well the sudden turn-on or turn-off of a low-decibel sound, but its sensation goes away when it's left on for more than a few seconds.

  40. Re:Somebody explain to me how this is an "experime by cplusplus · · Score: 1

    To the best of my ability to read, we just spent a few million dollars so that we could learn the direction the wind was blowing. At one point. On a rock. A rock very, very far away from here. Where no humans fly, boat, or do anything else which benefits in the slightest from wind directional data. I watched a PBS show about the Phoenix lander, and they briefly discussed this instrument. The reason they need to know if the wind is blowing has to do with the soil sample collection. They don't want to scoop a sample and attempt to move the sample bucket above the lander if the wind is blowing. Doing that would risk dropping dust and dirt from the sampler on to the top of the lander. Oh, and you did know that this lander will be digging down and actually analyzing samples before you posted, right?
    --
    "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
  41. Sailing by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    When racing sailboats, every little of winds counts. You can see strong winds coming over the water at a distance, but the ones next to you are difficult to make out. So, you fix small feathers to strong lightweight thread to the fore, side and back stays, and it becomes possible to see the wind as it shifts around. Including watching how your sail impacts the wind. Obviously when the winds are 20-60 mph, nobody will care, but the light 1-15 is very important. It use to makes the difference of wether you can beat Buddy Melges or not.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  42. Very interesting, this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phoenix / Firebird / Firefox / Firestone / Firefire probe.

    Maybe I start a profitable business of selling non-copyrighted names...

  43. Re:Telltale's (sic) by aqk · · Score: 1

    Who is "Telltale"?
    Is he one of those li'l coloured ribbons hanging from the sail showing the airflow?

    Anyhow, when sailing - to determine the wind direction and strength- we usually use a plastic supermarket bag - hopefully emptied of all its booze - tied to one of the mainmast stays, where it's easily visible from the wheel.

    I dunno what we'll do when plastic has been finally banned from the supermarkets and liqueur stores... go back to using the heavier (and less reliable) ensign, I guess.


  44. University of Alberta by imbezol · · Score: 1

    This was actually developed by Carlos Lange from the University of Alberta. It was constructed in Denmark at the University of Aarhus. And of course the project is run from the University of Arizona.

    http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=5de7e220-b9d3-4540-8c02-f9369339c52c
    http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=25509
    http://www.expressnews.ualberta.ca/article.cfm?id=9360
    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/620268/The-Telltale-Wind-Experiment-for-the-NASA-Phoenix-Mars-Lander-2008

    One thing for certain.. it's definitely a U of A project.

    1. Re:University of Alberta by cflange · · Score: 1
      OK, let's give credit where it's due. (and don't believe everything the press tells you... even well-meaning reporters can get a story wrong.)

      Dr. Gunnlaugsson and his group at the Aarhus University did most of the development and design of the telltale as a space qualified instrument, including building and testing of prototypes and the final flight model.

      The original concept was proposed by my group at the University of Alberta. We also ran simulated experiments with various early prototypes as a proof-of-concept that demonstrated to the rest of the Science Team that such a simple instrument would work on Mars. I say simulated experiment, because we don't have a Mars Wind Tunnel at the UofA, as AarhusU does. So, we ran our wind tunnel at speeds that produced the same drag as expected on Mars. After the initial proof-of-concept work, AarhusU took over the development, manufacture and testing, but we continued to support the work of characterization of the instrument with our CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations, which you can see briefly described in the CFD-Lab website:
      http://www.mece.ualberta.ca/~clange/phoenix/
      under Projects.

      In summary, the Phoenix Telltale was conceived at the University of Alberta, but its gestation and birth happened at Aarhus University.

      Lange

      --
      Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?