Slashdot Mirror


Details Emerging On Tunguska Impact Crater

#space_on_irc.freenode.net (Dusty) writes "Lake Cheko in Siberia has been noted as the probable crater of the 1908 Siberian Tunguska event. This news was discussed here in December, but details on the crater were scant. Now a new paper written by Luca Gasperini, Enrico Bonatti, and Giuseppe Longo (the same team in Bologna, Italy that made news in December) has a horde of new details on the supposed crater. The team visited Lake Cheko complete with their own catamaran and completed ground-penetrating radar maps, side-scanning sonar images, aerial images, and some sample collection of Lake Cheko. Intriguingly, they also imaged an object under the sediment that may be a fragment of the impacting body. Their paper (PDF) includes a lot more details including images, side-scanning sonar image, a 3-D view of the lake, a morphobathymetric map. It's an interesting read, these dudes are good. They plan to return this summer and drill the core if weather permits, hopefully answering the question once and for all." The same team also has a more discursive article in the current Scientific American that includes some detail on the working conditions in the Siberian summer. Think: mosquitos.

164 comments

  1. First Impact.. by Phrogman · · Score: 5, Funny

    err, post I mean

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  2. Think twinkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...thirty-five feet long, weighing approximately six hundred pounds.

    1. Re:Think twinkie by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      That's a big Twinkie.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    2. Re:Think twinkie by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Funny

      As long as dogs and cats aren't living together, we should be cool.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Think twinkie by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Tunguska blast may well have been the biggest interdimensional crossrip up until the Gozer incident of 1984.

    4. Re:Think twinkie by Molochi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just remember to answer, "Yes, I am a god."

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    5. Re:Think twinkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep fried (*barf*)

    6. Re:Think twinkie by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      The better line would of Been "RAY, if a WOMAN asks if you're a God - SAY YES!"

      And yes, my names Ray....

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    7. Re:Think twinkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many waterways fill the lake? Do any of the streams cross?

  3. whoosh... by Thornburg · · Score: 4, Funny


    BOOOM!!!

    What else do we need to know about the Tunguska event?

    Ok, maybe it would make a cool short film by some of animation whiz. Preferably starring the squirrel from the Ice Age shorts.

  4. C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The team visited Lake Cheko complete with their own catamaran

    Is it really that hard to spell 'cameraman' correctly? C'mon editors! Get on it!

    1. Re:C'mon editors! by Thornburg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The team visited Lake Cheko complete with their own catamaran

      Is it really that hard to spell 'cameraman' correctly? C'mon editors! Get on it! I assume this cowardly post was supposed to be funny, but just in case you really are that uninformed, a catamaran is a kind of boat.

      See wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catamaran
    2. Re:C'mon editors! by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, funny is spelling it "catamoron"

    3. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      >The team visited Lake Cheko complete with their own catamaran

      Is it really that hard to spell 'cameraman' correctly? C'mon editors! Get on it!


      Catamaran is correct.

      That's because: In former Russia, your Tunguska's got a catamaran.

    4. Re:C'mon editors! by fracai · · Score: 1

      hehe

      catamaroon

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    5. Re:C'mon editors! by AutopsyReport · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Russia Soviet, a cat has got your Tongueska.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    6. Re:C'mon editors! by Mephistro · · Score: 0, Redundant


      I have a catamaran, you insensitive clods!

    7. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *am* an insensitive clod, you dumb bastards!

      Signed,
          Reflector-T

    8. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you're a real blast at parties.

    9. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *am* an insensitive clod, you dumb bastards!

      I am a dumb bastard, you xfvekw lefnveke!
    10. Re:C'mon editors! by longacre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, Soviet Russia was not formed until 1922. Tunguska occurred 14 years too early for this meme.

    11. Re:C'mon editors! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      It's spelled catamoran over on Fark.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:C'mon editors! by Dramacrat · · Score: 1, Funny

      Katamari?

      --
      There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
    13. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tunguska occurred 14 years too early for this meme.

      It's all "meme, meme, meme" with you, isn't it?

    14. Re:C'mon editors! by mazarin5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Czarist Russia, meme is too early for you!

      --
      Fnord.
    15. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katamari?

      I think a katamari causing the crater is one of the most reasonable explanations I've heard yet.

    16. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lame version of the funnier GP joke gets modded higher. Maybe it's just because the GP joke requires some thought.

    17. Re:C'mon editors! by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      Oh...I assumed it was "catamite". Who was their cameraman, riding in the catamaran. Say that three times fast.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    18. Re:C'mon editors! by jeremyds · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod you up past +5. That was the funniest Soviet Russia joke thread I've seen in a long time.

    19. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the mod didn't see Mall Rats...

    20. Re:C'mon editors! by ardle · · Score: 1

      Cartman, of course :-)

    21. Re:C'mon editors! by ardle · · Score: 1

      I mean, Cartman was the cameraman on the catamaran - he called himself "catamite" cos he's camera-shy.
      I don't know what "catamite" is, didn't get your post, thought it was a question.

    22. Re:C'mon editors! by goga_russian · · Score: 1

      well maybe too late since wiki comments were hiddden... but ...by the Transitivity of implication you are....trigger happy.

      --
      Dont Judge The situation by the Misfortunate. Goga.
    23. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Czarist Russia, meme is too early for you!

      Youyou is too early for meme everywhere, not just in Czarist Russia.

    24. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A catamaran (From Tamil 'kattumaram')[1] is a type of multihulled boat or ship consisting of two hulls, or Vakas, joined by a frame, formed of Akas.

    25. Re:C'mon editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catamaran is a type of boat.
      They were on a lake... this does not seem to far fetched to me (I haven't read their paper yet)

  5. SciFi movine waiting to happen! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    The object is a space ship!

    1. Re:SciFi movine waiting to happen! by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      The object is a space ship!

      Umm,... that's been done before. ;-)

    2. Re:SciFi movine waiting to happen! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Umm,... that's been

      Yes, many times over. I haven't seen Crystal Skull yet, but can name "Quatermass and the Pit aka 2million years to earth," "Sphere" with Dustin Hoffman, lets not forget "The Abyss" to name a few.

      However, it could make for a topical SciFi with some current events.

    3. Re:SciFi movine waiting to happen! by Nathrael · · Score: 2

      I Want To Believe!

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
  6. Very interesting article by Tisha_AH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been following this team's progress with their investigation since it first came to light last year on the slash. They present a compelling case that there may be an impact body that created the lake.

    I can't wait and see their results from core drilling the lake.

    There have been several other impacts that were recorded by mankind (one in Estonia, recorded by Pliny the Younger).

    The Tunguska event could be mis-interpreted as a nuclear strike if it were to happen today over a populated area. We need to increase our understanding of the frequency and effects of bolide impacts upon our planet.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:Very interesting article by cavtroop · · Score: 2, Funny
      We need to increase our understanding of the frequency and effects of bolide impacts upon our planet.

      Or, increase investment in bomb shelter manufacturers :)

    2. Re:Very interesting article by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Tunguska event could be mis-interpreted as a nuclear strike if it were to happen today over a populated area.

      I thought nuclear strikes were highly radioactive. That and other clues would be easy to gather very quickly.

    3. Re:Very interesting article by Tisha_AH · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, a nuclear weapon will leave radioactivity and this can be detected readily. Unfortunately we are still living in a world where submarines, bombers and missiles are pointed from country to country like loaded shotguns on a hair trigger.

      My fear is that someone would mis-interpret an incoming meteor as a nuclear weapon and initiate a launch on their perceived threats.

      If Moscow, Washington DC, Beijing or London were wiped out in a meteorite strike that was not detected before the destruction. Do you think that missile forces would not be put on high alert?

      We are not that far away from the days of "Fail Safe".

      --
      Tisha Hayes
    4. Re:Very interesting article by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      The Tunguska event could be mis-interpreted as a nuclear strike if it were to happen today over a populated area.

      I thought nuclear strikes were highly radioactive. That and other clues would be easy to gather very quickly. What do you mean "very quickly"? By "very quickly", do you mean "Mr. President, we believe this to be a Russian first strike, and you must decide in the next 5 minutes if we are going to retaliate" quick?
    5. Re:Very interesting article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The misinterpretation in question would be caused by the sudden and massive thermal signature upon explosion of such an impactor. Early warning satellites with infrared sensors would pick that up immediately and automatically trigger respective warning cascades, and it would require human intervention and identification to tell that the huge explosion was in fact a natural phenomenon.

    6. Re:Very interesting article by jmichaelg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The grandparent may be thinking of this event. Had the bollide arrived a few hours earlier, it would have exploded over either Pakistan or India who were already shooting at each other over Kashmir. The explosion was twice as large as the Hiroshima blast.

      Whether both sides would have held their fire in that event is hard to tell.

    7. Re:Very interesting article by geobeck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My fear is that someone would mis-interpret an incoming meteor as a nuclear weapon and initiate a launch on their perceived threats.

      Not a fear likely to be realized, fortunately. If a major strategic city is vaporized, it's almost a certainty that it was destroyed by a strategic nuke. If a random area of countryside or open ocean is vaporized, it's almost certainly a meteotie/asteroid/comet.

      The percentage of Earth's surface covered by major strategic cities is miniscule. If an asteroid ever does hit one square on, that will be a sign that someone up there has decided to pull another Sodom & Gamorrah.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    8. Re:Very interesting article by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      If Moscow, Washington DC, Beijing or London were wiped out in a meteorite strike that was not detected before the destruction. Do you think that missile forces would not be put on high alert?

      Sure, they'd be put on 'high alert'. But 'high alert' isn't 'launching'. (And there really isn't such a thing as 'high alert' anyhow, either you are on alert or you are not.)
       
       

      Unfortunately we are still living in a world where submarines, bombers and missiles are pointed from country to country like loaded shotguns on a hair trigger.

      Not in the case of the US, UK, Russia, or France. Maybe the Chinese are on hair trigger?
       
       

      My fear is that someone would mis-interpret an incoming meteor as a nuclear weapon and initiate a launch on their perceived threats.

      Given that a) an incoming meteor is trivially distinguishable from an incoming warhead and b) very few people are looking anyhow... That's a fear not based on reality.
    9. Re:Very interesting article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...recorded by Pliny the Younger

      Not to be confused with Whiny the Middle Child...

    10. Re:Very interesting article by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

      The Tunguska event could be mis-interpreted as a nuclear strike if it were to happen today over a populated area. I doubt a meteor plummeting to the earth at a high rate of speed would go unnoticed by billions of people. With so many amateur astronomers today, someone is bound to make a movie and post it somewhere on the net....

      EVERYONE PANIC!!!!
      --
      It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
    11. Re:Very interesting article by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Informative
      No, the timing of that event was as close as it was going to get to causing any damage to the Earth:

      However, since the Earth also travels around the Sun with an average orbital speed of 107,218 km/h, 3 hours earlier the Earth would have been about 300,000 km away from the intersection of its orbit with the projectile's orbit at the time that the South Asian region was rotated towards the projectile's path. So the projectile would have missed the Earth entirely by over 114 times the Earth's radius, about the distance to the Moon, and probably never even noticed by anyone but a few astronomers. Nice try, though.
      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Very interesting article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a real meteorite is extremely unlikely to strike one of them, they only do so in movies.

    13. Re:Very interesting article by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Ever since the Cuban Missile incident, I'm pretty sure Moscow and Washington have been wired to each other. With the protocol that if somebody wants to fight dirty, they have to make the call.

      Then there's the fact that Soviet Union and the US had a silent non-destruction pact; that if Soviet subs were shot down in US training that the russians would simply back off, and that the americans would do the same. Vice versa too. I don't think they alerted each other of their presence, but maybe they did. Body would be sent back, saying they died in training and that was that. The soviets lost a fair 30-60 subs because of accidents at sea, americans lost about half of that.

      So I'm hoping they'd be intelligent enough to call each other first and say "Alright. We're declaring war, and we're using our nuclear arsenal.". But who hits each other with nukes anyway? It would much quicker be Russia calling the US or vice versa saying "Oh shit, did you catch that asteroid hitting X city?"

    14. Re:Very interesting article by himi · · Score: 1

      Sure, it couldn't have worked out badly as it happened, but it demonstrates that this kind of event /does/ occur and that it could easily be mistaken for a nuclear explosion.

      What if its trajectory had been just right to have it impact three hours earlier? The timing was completely random, so it could have gone either way (or any other way).

      himi

      --

      My very own DeCSS mirror.
    15. Re:Very interesting article by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What if a very tiny meteorite hit the new president while being inaugurated? That would set off World War IV!

      Our world is certainly too much armed to the teeth, on hair triggers around the globe, jumping to believe the worst of each other. But inventing such an improbable confluence of several improbable events as a threat worth addressing is almost as irrational as pretending that the mutual destruction machine we've erected is not a threat in itself. There are real threats making that machine risky to deal with, without discrediting the notion with these movie plot threats.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:Very interesting article by chthon · · Score: 1

      Nurse or nuke ? (but that was about Ronald Reagan)

    17. Re:Very interesting article by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      We would almost certainly know when and approximately where any large enough celestial "body" would hit to forewarn at least the government of said nations, if not the citizens.

      We are pretty good at tracking things in the sky these days simply because we're worried about your scenario. Fear not, we won't be accidentally involved in a nuclear war. We'll handle that all by ourselves, the old fashioned way-some asshole will act stupid.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    18. Re:Very interesting article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought nuclear strikes were highly radioactive. That and other clues would be easy to gather very quickly. But probably not quickly enough to avoid a counter-attack.......
    19. Re:Very interesting article by jafac · · Score: 1

      well - if one country has triggermen who are LOOKING for an excuse, a meteor impact would be a very convenient one.

      "oops! we thought it was a nuclear strike. my bad. Sorry."

      compare this to:
      "oops, we thought Saddam had active WMD programs, and was 40 minutes away from launching a chemical strike on Tel Aviv. Sorry. My bad."

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  7. We can check it for serial numbers :) by NickFortune · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, the smart bet seems to be that event was caused by an asteroid strike. But until someone gathers some hard data, that's still only a hypothesis.

    What self respecting scientist wouldn't go and examine the evidence? Because if it wasn't an asteroid strike...

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    1. Re:We can check it for serial numbers :) by Dancindan84 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What self respecting scientist wouldn't go and examine the evidence? Because if it wasn't an asteroid strike... ... they may accidentally defrost Megatron!
      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:We can check it for serial numbers :) by phat_cartman · · Score: 4, Funny

      What self respecting scientist wouldn't go and examine the evidence?

      I initially read that as "What self-replicating scientist...". After that, the jokes really write themselves...
    3. Re:We can check it for serial numbers :) by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I remember correctly, most of the models depict an asteroid exploding in mid-air. Certainly, a great deal of the debris would end up on the ground, but falling debris would have a very different impact (no pun intended, unless it's funny) than a single large strike.

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    4. Re:We can check it for serial numbers :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll be the next Indiana Jones movie.

    5. Re:We can check it for serial numbers :) by syukton · · Score: 1

      After that, the jokes really write themselves... Yes, but they're all the same.
      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  8. We all know Tesla did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you saw that documentary on him called The Prestige, you know he's capable of almost anything.

    1. Re:We all know Tesla did it by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      In actuality, it's David Bowie that has the creepy electrical powers; Tesla was good, but Bowie worked better for the movie.

      Personally, I'm in the group that thinks Flight of the Conchords did it by the power of Bowie. They took acid, then caused the trees to explode by playing David Bowie music for them. Even though Bowie himself wasn't there, the music still had that much power.

    2. Re:We all know Tesla did it by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      People just don't want to admit that Tesla's 'death ray', or the Wardenclyffe event actually did something so remotely away.

  9. RE: Siberian Summer. Think Mosquitos. by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    And vodka, and borst, and potatoes.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  10. Evidence against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The various samplings from the bottom of Lake Cheko (P'yavchenko, Kozlovskaya) revealed extensive development of silt up to 7 meters deep, indicating an ancient origin for the lake (tentatively estimated at 5000 to 10,000 years), thus completely contradicting the hypothesis of the formation of the lake as a result of the Tunguska meteorite fall (V. Koshelev, 1960)."

    http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/tungmet.html

    1. Re:Evidence against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yes, which, if you had read the paper linked to, you would see that they tackle said claim directly.

      However, as our study progressed, we began to question the old age of the lake for the following reasons:
      1 Our sub-bottom acoustic reïection data show that, of a 10 m thick sediment pile, only the top
      1 ± 0.5 m is laminated, ïne-grained, normal lacustrine sediments (Gasperini et al., 2007). The
      lower chaotic material appears not to be deposited by normal lacustrine sedimentation.
      2 210 Pb and 137 Cs datings on sediment cores from the lake suggest sedimentation rates of roughly 1cm/yr)1(Gasperini et al., 2001). Assuming this rate is mostly due to ïne-grained material transported into the lake from the Kimchu
      River, the thin lacustrine sequence is compatible with a young (100 years) age for the lake.
    2. Re:Evidence against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      from TFA:

      "we started our work at
      Lake Cheko on the assumption that
      it was older than the TE: our objective
      was to find markers of the TE in the
      lake's sediments. However, as our
      study progressed, we began to question
      the old age of the lake for the
      following reasons:
      1 Our sub-bottom acoustic reflection
      data show that, of a 10 m thick
      sediment pile, only the top 1 ± 0.5 m is laminated, finegrained,
      "normal" lacustrine sediments
      (Gasperini et al., 2007). The
      lower chaotic material appears not
      to be deposited by normal lacustrine
      sedimentation."

      they also give 2 more reasons: the sedementation rate for the above sediment gives an age of ~100years, and numerous personal accounts that never mention or map a lake at the location, only a swamp.

  11. slip by owlnation · · Score: 1

    So what's the adjective from Lake Cheko? Chekovian? Maybe someone's finger slipped on the photon torpedo launcher controls, and they came back in time to rename the lake -- so it went on his permanent record.

    1. Re:slip by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have a loaded photon torpedo launcher in the first act, it had better be fired before the end of the third!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  12. Go Slashdot !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is what I'm talking about!

    No more of that crap from idle on the front page, this is what you should be posting! This makes my geekiness tingle, this is what keeps me coming back. Please, for the love of God, more of the same!

    1. Re:Go Slashdot !!! by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

      Are you asking for a dupe?

      --
      Ni.
  13. this is not real science by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    this is just astroturf advertising

    for the upcoming x-files movie this july

    relax, i'm joking, but what is described sounds exactly like an x-files episode, doesn't it?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this is not real science by fracai · · Score: 4, Funny

      yeah, The X-Files should totally have done an episode where it turns out that the Tunguska event was the land fall of aliens. They could even call the episode Tunguska!

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    2. Re:this is not real science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it would be a blast!

    3. Re:this is not real science by olyar · · Score: 1

      Thank you for reassuring me. I only delved into the comments to find the X-Files reference.

      Pretty much I read /. to daily remind myself that I'm not the only hopeless geek out there.

      --
      Custom, hands-free Linux installs. Instalinux
    4. Re:this is not real science by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      It would've been a good fit, though they would need to have invented a non-cheesy explanation for why the American FBI was investigating an incident in Russia.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    5. Re:this is not real science by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this funny but alas all my points were used up.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  14. They'll have to rewrite all the books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tobin's Spirit Guide, for one.

  15. For those that can't seem to find it by the_arrow · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Wikipedia, the lake is at 60.964 N and 101.86 E. Might make it easier to find in Google earth.

    --
    / The Arrow
    "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    1. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      WTF? I can get better zoom resolution on a lake in the middle of nowhere Siberia than I can get at my house!?

      Somethings just not right about that.

    2. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, the lake is at 60.964 N and 101.86 E. Might make it easier to find in Google earth.
      Particularly if you look at the Wikipedia article and click on the coordinates in the upper right corner, then click on the link to locate in Google Earth.
    3. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by LtCmdrJoel · · Score: 2, Funny

      No street view? WTF?

    4. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by wcrowe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn! It wouldn't calculate driving directions!

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    5. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 3, Funny

      So move out of Area 51. Problem solved!

    6. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

      I don't know... Area 51 seems to have been imaged at a decent resolution:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&ll=37.129221,-116.069784&spn=0.020563,0.035834&t=h&z=15

      --
      Ramen
    7. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems reasonable. This is an area of scientific and popular interest. Can you say the same of your house?

    8. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why they don't look at http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=60.9,+101.93&ie=UTF8&ll=60.900016,101.930037&spn=0.029094,0.069351&t=h&z=14 instead? It's only 8 km away and actually looks like an impact crater.

    9. Re:For those that can't seem to find it by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Wow, that looks a heck of lot like the ultrasound I had on my kidney.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  16. All your blood are belong to us by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Mosquito suck YOU!

    Oh ... wait ... nevermind.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  17. Not the original paper ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The paper in the posting is a reply to a comment with the contrary interpretation (i.e. that Lake Cheko isn't an impact) [Same paper as PDF]. The critical comment should be cited too.

    The original paper by Gasperini et al. (2007) is also available as PDF and HTML.

    I'm not particularly convinced by the evidence they present. It's quite circumstantial. What they need to find and sample is an ejecta-related layer in the lake stratigraphy or in a lake nearby, and you'd think that if such a large impactor hit the ground there would be plenty of micrometeorite debris in the sediments of the surrounding area. Geomorphological evidence and age just isn't enough.

    1. Re:Not the original paper ... by aslagle · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be why they're planning to return and make core samples....

    2. Re:Not the original paper ... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      I'm with you: when I read the original paper, I wasn't really bowled over by their case. In fact, I was a little concerned about the contrary evidence (which they addressed, but generally only in an iffy fashion). This lake *may* be the impact crater, but it's far from certain in my mind. I'd expect Slashdot to do better with differentiating between generally accepted theories and shaky ones.

    3. Re:Not the original paper ... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find the shape of the lake itself to be indicative of an artificial (as in non-erosion related) nature. The entry and exit points in the lake are very close together, and on the same side. The area is generally flat (check out Google Earth for that), except for the depression that forms the lake.

      There is also the explanation of a sink hole, but that would be rather round, instead of elongated. The final proof would definitely be the discovery of micrometeorite material in the sediments, or other layers that are commonly associated with meteorite impacts (glass layers in case of sandy soil, etc). But until then, I'd say that it is more likely to argue for cause other than just erosion.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  18. And lonely, vast expanses of nothingness by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Summer never really comes to Siberia.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:And lonely, vast expanses of nothingness by gloryhallelujah · · Score: 2

      Summer never really comes to Siberia. So not true. Siberia, in that region, is beautiful boreal forest (taiga) and the climate is sharp continental. It can easily reach +30C. I love Siberia!
      --
      The Turing test cuts both ways
    2. Re:And lonely, vast expanses of nothingness by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Woosh!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  19. Nope. Still aliens by solweil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is obviously BS. Clearly aliens are to blame. Or perhaps the clones of Tesla using the HAARP array to send a destructive beam back in time.

    1. Re:Nope. Still aliens by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Don't. Mention. The time cube.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  20. Re:Pictures by Molochi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I amused that a link to goatse can be merely ruled offtopic now.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  21. An alternative hypothesis by D.+J.+Keenan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The extra-terrestial impactor (i.e. asteroid/comet) hypothesis has been around for a long time. It has been questioned for several reasons. In particular, (i) there were bright/white nights before the event, and (ii) debris has been found in crash sites from meteorites 10000 times lighter, whereas there is none at Tunguska.

    For more details and an alternative explanation, see the following.
    W. Kundt (2001), "The 1908 Tunguska catastrophe", Current Science, 81: 399-407.

    Dr. Kundt is at the University of Bonn. Briefly, his hypothesis is that there was a days-long leakage of natural gas, from Earth; the gas rose up and was eventually ignited by lightning. This seems to fit the evidence better.

    In an earlier discussion on Slashdot, someone posted a comment claiming that there was a similar explosion of natural gas in Texas in 1992. (I googled, but could find no evidence.)

    I do not understand the geology well, but it does not seem that the Italian researchers (cited in TFA) have found evidence against Kundt's hypothesis.

    1. Re:An alternative hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This theory has been tossed around before, but it seems highly unlikely. Natural gas explosions tend to be relatively soft (as far as explosions go), burning only as fast as they can deliver oxygen to the unburned gas. The result is a weak pressure wave, rather than a shockwave, and a sustained fireball with lots and lots of singing. Tunguska appears to have been a rapid, forceful explosion. A forceful explosion of this size would require a very large pocket of near stoichiometrically mixed natural gas...something that is almost unbelievable. More likely it would collect in pockets that would burn unevenly causing lots of little flares.

      Additionally, I don't think anyone has identified any evidence of natural gas seepage in the area.

      Larger impactors maintain more speed coming through the atmosphere due to their high mass/drag ratio, whereas smaller ones impact relatively softly at around terminal velocity. The high speed impact typically vaporizes the largest impactors. Barringer Crater is a good example of this.

      Also, since no one knows for sure what blew up at Tunguska, you can't say how dense it was. Many researchers think it was a fragile, low density meteor that fragment and exploded a few thousand feet above the ground.

    2. Re:An alternative hypothesis by mr.bri · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what you mean by no evidence of the gas explosion outside of Houston in 1992 (if this is what you are referring to), since a quick Google search returned this as the first result:

      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE2D7143DF93BA35757C0A964958260

      I was on my way to high school and could feel/hear the result while driving my car. Lived in NW Houston at the time. Parents later said they thought it was an earthquake, although they knew it was not really possible due to the type of soil in the area. Discussed it with a few friends at school, and we dismissed it as a weird fluke, but found out the cause that evening on the news. We never would have guessed that's what it was.

      I have no opinion on Dr. Kundt's theories, but I have anecdotal evidence regarding the gas explosion outside of Houston.

  22. well... by murka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, catamaran is an argument. My mother [In Russian] was on the first "Complex Independent Expedition" and on the few following ones in the 60s. (She is available for questions). Many many scientists spent years on the spot, checking all possible hypothesises from a crashed space craft to an exploded ice comet. The result: no actual material ever found and the forest damage shows that the explosion took place far above the surface. BTW, there are plenty of lakes there, as the area is pretty wet. Pick one on Google Maps to fit your favorite hypothesis.

    1. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably familiar then, that some have proposed that large fragments might survived intact after the explosion and continued to the ground. I've read elsewhere that Kulik or someone tried to estimate a trajectory from eyewitness reports, and that Lake Cheko lies roughly in line with this estimated trajectory.

  23. D'ya think by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

    Semen Semenov (SciAM article) got teased as a kid?

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    1. Re:D'ya think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he?

      -- Dick Dickinson

    2. Re:D'ya think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No idea.

      --
      OraLynn Manweller

  24. Semen Semenov? Ouch. by GreyDuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the SciAm article's photo caption: "In this artist's conception, Semen Semenov, who witnessed the blast at a distant trading post, starts to feel the heat."

    That's... a really, really unfortunate name, dude.

    (I love that they managed to work "heat" and "conception" into a sentence about a guy named Semen.)

    --
    I'm only wearing black until they come out with something darker.
    1. Re:Semen Semenov? Ouch. by nawcom · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHA. this made my day. Seriously. Semen Semenov. Sounds like some guys porno name who plays this russian character. DDDDllloppping lewwwds!!!

    2. Re:Semen Semenov? Ouch. by 21mhz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to be a bore, but it's a lossy transliteration.
      The name actually sounds more like Semyon Semyonov, pretty ordinary (except I wouldn't give my son a surname echo for a first name; matter of taste).

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    3. Re:Semen Semenov? Ouch. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      They managed to squeeze in (out?) 'blast' too .......

    4. Re:Semen Semenov? Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I love that they managed to work "heat" and "conception" into a sentence about a guy named Semen.) And "blast"... and "post"...

    5. Re:Semen Semenov? Ouch. by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      That explanation is a fruitless as John Bigbootay's from The Adventures of Buckaroo Bonzai. You're STILL getting teased on the playground with that name!

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:Semen Semenov? Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I love that they managed to work "heat" and "conception" into a sentence about a guy named Semen.) not to mention "blast" ;)
  25. It's a UFO by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    hey also imaged an object under the sediment that may be a fragment of the impacting body.


    That would be a downed UFO.
    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:It's a UFO by section321a · · Score: 1

      Bless you my friend. You've brought back lot's of repressed memories of day-long D&D sessions. I remember playing that module and loving it. A fighter with a blaster pistol... it doesn't get any better then this...

  26. Bleh! by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

    Hoard != Horde

    Bleh!!!

  27. Mosquitos ++ by RockDoctor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the working conditions in the Siberian summer. Think: mosquitos.
    Mosquitoes ad nauseam.

    Mosquitoes to the point of anaphylaxis (well, that was what the rig's medic was afraid of, which is why he evacuated me back to the base camp).

    Mosquitoes that can maintain eye contact at a meter range (i.e you can see it's eyes at a meter range) through the window of the car, then launch an assault on this nice juicy mammal, only being stopped by the glass of the window.

    Mosquitoes that can keep pace with you while driving at 40km/hr on a dirt road.

    Mosquitoes that can bite you through a leather glove, 20 times in one evening's work. They choose the clipboard hand, because you can't swat with that and get your work done.

    Don't get me wrong - Siberia is interesting, but don't forget the industrial strength insect repellent and the appropriate clothing. If you don't know what's appropriate, ask a bee keeper. And don't forget the vaccination against tick-borne encaphalitis (which includes Lyme disease, I believe), which takes several weeks to become effective.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    1. Re: Mosquitos ++ by 21mhz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Accordingly to one hypothesis, the cause of the Tunguska event was a spontaneous explosive combustion of a 5 cubic km cloud of gnats.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    2. Re: Mosquitos ++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not quite as out there as you imply - dust clouds of any combustible material are highly volatile. You can turn something as simple as a bic lighter, a baloon, and coffee creamer into a spectacular incendiary bomb if you like.

      Gnats would have to be pretty dense and pretty dry/combustible, but I'm sure you could make the flame self-sustaining w/ a 20% fuel-air mix.

    3. Re: Mosquitos ++ by mev · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That is a little more severe than I encountered when bicycling across Russia last summer.

      Between end of May and mid-July, we traveled through the West-Siberian plain. We generally encountered four major types of flying insects there:
      • Big biting flies, 2-3cm; could keep up with a 20km/hr cyclist. Got situated before biting, so if you were quick enough, could swat them away. Seemed to be gone if it was too cold.
      • Mosquitoes; did not keep up with a 20km/hr cyclist. Particularly active in morning and evening.
      • Small biting flies; not a problem when traveling but a problem when camping
      • Small non-biting flies; not a big problem

      Depending on where we camped, we also had problems with ants.

      The density of the mosquitoes and biting flies were approximately the same as I've encountered on previous bicycle trips in northern Yukon and Alaska. However, they were much more widespread and much more continuous, day after day. Every place we camped for a month and a half, we had insects. Sometimes worse, but always present. (That was not the case in Alaska.) If one were working in one place or traveling slower than 20km/hr, I could see why that would be even worse.

      However, either the situation is even worse where RockDoctor was at than where I cycled or there is (slight) exageration here, e.g. I encountered biting flies that could do 20km/hr but not mosquitoes.
    4. Re: Mosquitos ++ by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      I just have to ask, how does one do this? I mean you bike across Alaska, Russia, the yukon, and can report in detail about bugs. I sit here in my Southeastern home and wonder. Do you own a home, have family, do you have a job, and if so how do you pay for the time off and travel.

      I mean, this cannot be cheap. Do you get sponsors? Are you a scientist with a grant? I love my home, my job is okay, but Ithink when I read you're post 'Wow, that would be cool' yet I cannot imagine how one disconnects from real life and has the capability to roam the planet. Can you tell us arm chair voyeurs how it is done?

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    5. Re: Mosquitos ++ by mev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not married, no kids. Own a duplex, have tenants to take care of it when I'm gone. Work in tech which pays fine and have had an employer that has been willing to allow an occasional LOA. Live frugally and save money rather than rely on sponsors.

      Russia is a relatively expensive country, but bicycle travel and camping is not that expensive. It is also a good way to experience a country since it brings you in out of the way places without as many tourists.

    6. Re: Mosquitos ++ by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      West-Siberian plain (and most of the southern Siberia) is fine.

      Northern Siberia, however, is hell. I always wished for army-style chemical protection suite when I worked in Siberian tundra.

    7. Re: Mosquitos ++ by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      That is a little more severe than I encountered when bicycling across Russia last summer.
      Cycling is one thing. I'd be very worried about the attitude of the Russian drivers to cyclists. I don't think they'd be very friendly.

      * Big biting flies, 2-3cm; could keep up with a 20km/hr cyclist. Got situated before biting, so if you were quick enough, could swat them away. Seemed to be gone if it was too cold.
      That's probably the big car-chasing ones I met.

      * Mosquitoes; did not keep up with a 20km/hr cyclist. Particularly active in morning and evening.
      All over the place ; less worrying than the West Highland Midge (which has a well-earned reputation).

      * Small biting flies; not a problem when traveling but a problem when camping.
      ("mosheke", approximately), if I remember my Russian. They're the ones that can bite through leather gloves. Yes, I can see them being a problem for camping, when you've got your head over the stove etc. Standing around trying to measure, sketch and log 30m of drilling core isn't fun either.

      * Small non-biting flies; not a big problem
      Not even too populous (contra the West Highland Midge, which bite some people but not me. Thankfully.)

      Which parts of West Siberia were you in? I've spent 2 months working at Muravlenko, about 3 months (in installments) working and holidaying in (Noyabrsk), a couple of months at (Salym).
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re: Mosquitos ++ by mev · · Score: 1

      Which parts of West Siberia were you in? We cycled across all of Russia from St Petersburg to Vladivostok going via Kazan, Ekaterinburg, Omsk, Novosibirsk, Kemerovo, Krasnojarsk, Irkutsk, Ulan Ude, Chita, Khabarovsk mostly on the larger roads. Five months in total. Almost no insects before Kazan at end of May. Also, not as many insects after Krasnojarsk in mid-July. Thats why I singled out Western Siberia though there is also a time component.

      We typically camped not too far from the road, and there is a lot of low marshy ground. Typical procedure when we stopped for the day was to wear rain gear and mosquito net head gear while setting up tents. Once tents were up, we climbed inside, smashed bugs that had gotten in and didn't get out until morning.
    9. Re: Mosquitos ++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big biting flies, 2-3cm; could keep up with a 20km/hr cyclist. Got situated before biting, so if you were quick enough, could swat them away. Seemed to be gone if it was too cold.
      These? They tend to get quite large and are rather tough and hard to kill, even if you throw them on the ground and stomp them. In fact, only weak spot on them is their head. Catch them firmly between your thumb and index finger (don't worry, they have no stinger and even do not bite with their jaws in defense), with head out, then flip the head clean off with your other hand fingers. Oh and...they are great fishing bait, ditto for all blood sucking insects, I guess the fish know they are very nutritional. However, horsefly is by far easiest to catch, they rely on their sturdiness too much for their own good.

      Small biting flies; not a problem when traveling but a problem when camping
      I suppose this could be this one. Very annoying, especially before rain. The bite induces sudden sharp pain and reflex reaction, which may be a problem when hunting, fishing, generally prowling or sneaking, or just doing anything precise or sensitive, handling fragile equipment, etc. OTOH, you can tell the bad weather approaching... Very hard to catch, if you can do it, you are very fast!
    10. Re: Mosquitos ++ by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      We typically camped not too far from the road, and there is a lot of low marshy ground.

      You've just described most of Russia east of the Urals >G< . Well, to a first approximation anyway. A few hundred miles north-south makes quite a difference between degree of woodland versus open swamp, but it's all pretty swampy.

      Typical procedure when we stopped for the day was to wear rain gear and mosquito net head gear while setting up tents.
      Those "net head" hats are a life-saver, aren't they?

      Once tents were up, we climbed inside, smashed bugs that had gotten in and didn't get out until morning.
      Standard Operating Practice in the Highlands too. Same problem, same solution.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    11. Re: Mosquitos ++ by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Hmm - here in the united states I went camping in Canada a few years ago and was introduced to the Black Fly.

      I was ready to head back home after all of about one minute after stepping out of the car. Imagine mosquitos that tear hunks of flesh out of your skin, and which crawl under any exposed opening in your clothing.

      The only good thing was that for some reason they hated being inside cars - so if you dove into a car they'd fly to the windows where you could let them out. Trying to squish them would just render the windows opaque fairly quickly.

      Oh yeah - they did just fine pursuing you on bike. You could look back and literally see a cloud of the little monsters...

  28. Sum of All Fears by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the plutonium came from Hanford, Washington and was given on the Q-T to Tel Aviv.

  29. Burning Sky - Alexander Kazantsev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alexander Kazantsev wrote a book called Burning Sky about the possibility of the Tunguska impact being a spaceship.

    They have the story online in Russian:
    http://www.lib.ru/RUFANT/KAZANCEW/ostrov.txt

    I studied Russian in College and have translated (roughly, I need to go back and smooth my work) about 1/6 of the book. Any interested party can feel free to e-mail my msn account at danefuhr. Please, no spam.

    I have always been a big fan of soviet era science fiction (Fatal Eggs, Heart of a Dog, etc.).

  30. don't ruin my mental imagery by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    it was a lake after all. i figured a group of fanatical scientists, so hell bent on getting a catamaran to an isolated siberian lake they hired gangs of locals to backbreakingly carry the thing over the tundra for hundreds of miles before the short warm period was over, resulting in the deaths of dozens due to dysentry, resulting in revolts from the workers in the middle of nowhere, driving the fantatical scientists mad with desperation

    something like werner herzog's fanatical devotion to making fitzcarraldo:

    In his autobiographical film Portrait Werner Herzog, Herzog has stated that the film's spectacular production was partly inspired by the engineering feats of ancient standing stones. The film was an incredible ordeal, and famously involved moving a 320-ton steamship over a hill without the use of special effects. Herzog believes that no one has ever performed a similar feat in history, and likely never will again, calling himself "Conquistador of the Useless".[4] Scenes were also shot onboard the ship while it crashed through rapids, injuring three of the six people involved in the filming. Two full-size ships were created for the making of the film.[citation needed]

    The casting of the film was also quite difficult. Jason Robards was originally cast in the title role, but he became ill and was forced to leave. Herzog then considered casting Jack Nicholson, and even playing Fitzcarraldo himself, before Klaus Kinski accepted the role. By that point, forty percent of shooting was complete and Herzog insisted on a total reshoot with Kinski. Mick Jagger was originally cast as Fitzcarraldo's assistant Wilbur, but his shooting schedule expired and he departed to tour with the Rolling Stones. Herzog dropped Jagger's character from the script and reshot the film from the beginning. Though none of the major cast members spoke English natively, the original soundtrack was recorded in English, as it was the only language common to the lead actors.[citation needed]

    Klaus Kinski himself was a major source of tension, as he fought with Herzog and other members of the crew and greatly upset the native extras. In his documentary My Best Fiend, Herzog says that one of the native chiefs offered to murder Kinski for him, but that he declined because he needed Kinski to complete filming.

    Les Blank's documentary Burden of Dreams, about the production of the film, documents these many hardships. Blank's footage, which also appears in Herzog's Portrait Werner Herzog and My Best Fiend contains some of the only surviving footage of Robards and Jagger in Fitzcarraldo and many scenes documenting the ship's journey over the mountain, along with several episodes of Kinski's raving.


    but then you go and ruin all my beautiful cinematic mental imagery of the movie "tunguska: the all consuming obsession"... by pointing out its just a spellchecker failure

    poopiehead ;-(
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  31. Carolina bays by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a similar mystery right here in the U.S. The Carolina bays are elliptical depressions scattered throughout the southern Eastern U.S. seaboard. They're mostly filled with water so form small lakes, ponds, or wetlands. But they're all approximately the same shape and orientation (but not size). A variety of theories have been posed as to their origin, including a glancing comet strike (shallow angle impacts produce elliptical craters, not round). They're not as well-known as the Tunguska event, but they're a lot more accessible if you wanted to visit a mysterious possible impact site.

    1. Re:Carolina bays by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      Yep, quite near where I live in fact. You can readily see them from the air. Those filled in with soil or sand are still visible because of vegetation color differences (and would be vastly more convenient to excavate if one were interested). Bring along pumps though: the water table is often quite high and, given the flat nature of the land, water is difficult to dispose of.

      Oh, and bring money. Nawth Ca'lina can always use more money. Especially from rich curious scientists with fat grants :-)

  32. Could have been a comet by Solr_Flare · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, there is little doubt by any reputable scientist that it was some form of extra-terrestrial impact, what has remained in contention for a long time was what exactly impacted at Tunguska.

    One side insists it was an Asteroid, but the material that would normally be present at an asteroid impact just isn't there. Others argue it was a comet, but analysis of comets in the last decade or so has put some real doubt into that theory as well.

    At this point they pretty much have almost everything else worked out, from the velocity whatever it was had, where it traveled, where it likely went kaboom. They just don't know what the make-up of the object was. This report goes a long way towards proving exactly what the celestial object was.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  33. Do you want coffee? Do I? Yes, have some. by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    What'd you do, Ray?

  34. Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a Memorial Day conversation: "Are mosquitoes any good at all?" That is, do they play some small important role in the ecosystem such that we'd miss them if they were gone?

    I know, they kill millions of people with malaria, and we're not ready to launch the familiocide genetic weapon yet, but what will future humans decide?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mosquito larvae are a very important food for many small fish, and of larger insects (e.g. dragonflies).

    2. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a Memorial Day conversation: "Are mosquitoes any good at all?" That is, do they play some small important role in the ecosystem such that we'd miss them if they were gone?
      They perform the most important function in the world (from the perspective of the genes inside a mosquito) : they produce baby mosquitos.
      No seriously, that's the answer. All the answer that's necessary.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    3. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by conureman · · Score: 1

      Bird food. Huge role. Before humans learned to disregard common sense we didn't build our towns on swampland. Not a lot of population density in Siberia. I've got my own little bug paradise by the Skeena River in B.C. but it is habitable.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    4. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      No seriously, that's the answer. All the answer that's necessary.

      Why would that cause us to not want to eradicate them?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Bird food. Huge role.

      Good point; bats too.

      Before humans learned to disregard common sense we didn't build our towns on swampland.

      I've got mosquitos aplenty and I don't live near any swamps. Ours are annoying but not deadly.

      I've got my own little bug paradise by the Skeena River in B.C. but it is habitable.>

      Yeah, but if your children were dying you might feel differently.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      No seriously, that's the answer. All the answer that's necessary.
      Why would that cause us to not want to eradicate them?
      It doesn't address the question at all. To find the answer for that question, you need to look into your own morals. Or, if you've surrendered your moral judgement to someone else, ask them.

      I chose to not pursue studies and technologies that would or could lead to extermination of mosquitoes (or any other organism), but that's a personal choice. I am not your guide, and nor is nature.

      Considering that the Siberian mosquitoes (and the West Highland Midge, from which I suffer more often) transmit few common or major diseases to humans (or other animals), I can't think of anything that would push me to pursue such studies. Now, considering the Anopheles genus of mosquitoes (which transmit the Plasmodium genus of protists, and so lead to malaria in humans ... well you can make a stronger case for annihilating those particular mosquitoes. (I'm not at all sure that such a project would be any of possible, effective, efficient, or desirable. But making sure to attack the correct target is an important starting point.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    7. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Hrm, I think you replied to my original message where I specified this as a problem for future generations and the problem being malaria, but sorry if that was unclear.

      I suspect that unless any of the sterile breeders or vaccination programs are effective, at some point humans will make this choice, though I'm not sure I'll be around to see it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Mosquitoes - Any Good at All? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hrm, I think you replied to my original message where I specified this as a problem for future generations and the problem being malaria, but sorry if that was unclear.

      Certainly wasn't clear - I'd just been looking at the leaves of the message tree, not at nodes deeper in/ further up.

      I suspect that unless any of the sterile breeders or vaccination programs are effective, at some point humans will make this choice, though I'm not sure I'll be around to see it.

      Wrong target - Siberian mosquitoes are a different genus (I think Culex, but IANA-entomologist) to the several species of tropical, malaria-carrying mosquitoes (Anopheles, I'm sure). Since there are several species of malaria-carrying mosquitoes, each quite likely to have a number of local races (possibly distinct sub-species, not that this distinction is clearly defined) with significantly different behaviours (I'm fairly sure this has been proven for some of the populations being assessed for "sterile-flooding" control techniques, but IANA-entomologist), then the likelihood is that there is not going to be one technique which is going to be uniformly effective.

      Past experience is that not being completely effective on the first attempt at extermination in-the-wild is only going to breed-in resistance in the populations (e.g. MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphyllococcus aureus , named because S.aureus has successively acquired resistance to penicillin-derived antibiotics [late 1940s], then methicillin [late 1950s], and more recently tetracycline and erythromycin, leaving vancomycin as the sole remaining option ; resistance to vancomycin has reached intermediate levels in some populations [late 1990s], signalling the end of this line of treatment). So, the message is to hit the bugs overwhelmingly hard, overwhelmingly fast, with multiple attacks simultaneously.

      The mosquitoes are a problem where they come into contact with people ; but in afflicted countries (which could include the UK within the next decade or two) the same species exist "up country", affecting politically unimportant people (I am being heartlessly descriptive; I am not condoning this state of affairs). The reality of political behaviour in many "malaria belt" countries is that urban areas with politically important populations will receive the expenditure in a control or extermination programme, and the politically unimportant "up country" areas will get lesser-, minimal- or zero- expenditure. These areas will act as population reservoirs for the mosquitoes to persist in while the random mutations which will confer resistance to the chemicals or techniques firstly occur and secondarily are amplified in frequency in the population ; mosquitoes do not have the same ideas of social boundaries as humans and mix between areas. Resistance will occur with approximately the likelihood of the sun rising in the east tomorrow.

      Pending a pretty comprehensive change in human nature, I don't see an attempt at exterminating the relevant mosquitoes being successful. Going back to my earlier questions of whether an extermination attempt would be effective or efficient (or ...), there are real questions over whether such an attempt would be effective and even more profound questions over whether it would be more efficient to change human behaviour by improving drainage, prevention of human-mosquito contact, and simple education. All of which would have beneficial side effects, even if the Anopheles mosquito extermination project fails. Of course, saying that would mark me (in some circles) as being a card-carrying Communist.

      Sorry if I seem to be harping on about this, but as you can tell I have real doubts about the wisdom of attempting mosquito extermination, and I think that the more people who know about the hazards, the less likely it is to be attempted. (Or asked for.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  35. Assassins! by Unfocused · · Score: 1

    And here I thought the Tunguska event was an assault by the Assassins, on a Templar research facility...

    --
    ---- Don't lick something unless you really mean it.
  36. Tanguska epidemic by stanjam · · Score: 1

    I read an article once that surmised the Tunguska asteroid/comet was likely also responsible for the flu epidemic that swept the world around the same time, due to the rapid outbreak of the disease that couldn't be explained by travel patterns of the human species. Now they want to drill a core of the object! Here we go pandemic! Stock up on TheraFlu now! Doing my part to spread panic and conspiracy theory.

    --
    Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide
  37. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, asteroid explores YOU!

  38. we're doomed by yulek · · Score: 1

    oh god, don't do it. don't go there. don't drill it!

    don't they remember?

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  39. I've always wondered... by FazzMunkle · · Score: 1

    If there were any nomads or civilians caught in that explosion.