Slashdot Mirror


Phoenix Mars Lander Updates

spandex_panda writes "There are a few pictures of the Mars Lander on the ground — you can see its parachute and its heat shield a few kilometers away, too. There's a very cool looking picture of it floating down, actually captured while it's in the air with its parachute out!" We also have a YouTube video all about the robot arm that will dig down and probably find a groundhog who we all hope will see his shadow.

12 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. First Mars Blooper Released by NASA by sysusr · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    \x72\x6D\x20\x2D\x72\x66
    1. Re:First Mars Blooper Released by NASA by deroby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmm, and in 50 odd years when we find a cheap and convenient way to get there, will we be greeted by the locals with "g'day mate" ?

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
  2. Re:so let me ask the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    no digging allowed here. this is slashdot.

  3. More Pictures at NASA Website by peterd11 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I didn't see any link to the NASA site with the complete set of pictures: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/images/index.html

  4. Re:False color? by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Informative
    is the red color in these photos and the other Phoenix images the real color of the Mars surface (or at least an accurate reconstruction of what a human eye would see with ambient light there)

    It's as close as you can get to reconstructing the real color from a series of monochrome images taken with different color filters.

    or is it something NASA arbitrarily adds to impress viewers with notions about "the red planet"?

    That Mars is pretty much reddish all over, with some white at the poles, can be easily verified from Earth with a telescope.

  5. Re:This might be a dumb question... by Drive42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA does a lot just for show. Do you think those rockets need to produce all that fire and noise? Hell, those rockets could be the size of a large car and they'd still work. %90 of them are just styrofoam and cardboard. Remember, It's all for the benefit of the taxpayer. In fact, five years ago, NASA took a poll of what people wanted to see come out of the space program. Number one on the list? "A tiny stationary drilling labratory on the surface of mars. Preferably with a colorful parachute and a snazzy name."

    When will the government care about science?!

  6. Re:hmm by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

    Part of the descent was filmed by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter:

    http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080527.html

    Not quite what you want, but close.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  7. Re:One thing that bothers me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps in a lot of missions, you'd be right on. This one in particular, however, involves digging beneath the top dirt to get at the "permafrost" ice beneath, which is at an unknown (though thought to be small, like a few inches to a foot) depth.

    Blowing away the top layer of dust may have helped.

  8. Re:One thing that bothers me by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Informative

    Landers such as the Phoenix use thrusters to come to a safe, soft landing. Don't these thrusters blow away a lot of the useful sand and soil they are trying to collect?

    In the case of Phoenix, no - as the stuff NASA is interested in is a couple of inches down. At any rate, they use multiple small thrusters to minimize the amount of disturbance and contamination.
     
     

    That is the true advantage of Spirit and Opportunity, not only did they use airbags instead of rockets, they could drive away from the disturbed landing site.

    That advantage comes with a pair of powerful disadvantages: First, the airbag systems sharply limit the size of the probe - both in dimensions and in weight. Secondly, the airbag systems are heavy - they take up a higher percentage of the possible landed weight.
  9. Re:so let me ask the question by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK, class...

    Today's lesson in Internet humor will discuss text-based simulations of real-life behavior.

    Sometimes, it aids for delivery of humor to juxtapose two replies or comments together in such a way that one is hidden and the other is the official or formal one. A good example in common speech would be in Top Gun when the main character says one thing to the teacher and "coughs" a different response into his hand. The hidden, coughed, reply is shared with those nearby so they can share the deceit.

    For the humor impaired, or non-human readers out there, humor is often a social construct of sharing the joke or hidden meaning. Get it?

    A long time ago, before chat rooms or blogs, a common internet medium was a program called "talk". The primary difference of modes today was that each "talker" got half the screen and just typed away. You could type something and then backspace it away but the person on the other end would see the entire exchange. So they knew both the early response and the second.

    "^H" is representative of Control-H which in several terminal types is basically backspace. When people now type one thing followed by a series of "^H" they are simulating this early behavior of "talk" or even earlier and more mundane habit of hiding a hidden response or comment (cough, cough).

    Now, be sure to return next week (especially those semi-sentient programs out there) to tackle the more difficult topic of sarcasm.

  10. Re:so let me ask the question by fizzup · · Score: 5, Funny

    -------->   Joke
       O
      -+-       You
       |
      / \

  11. Re:This might be a dumb question... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe, though it would be nice if Taco and Company would add another option. Something along the lines of Stupid, Idiot, Moron or You've Got to be Kidding!

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower