Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Goes for World Download Record

Kelson writes "For the upcoming release of Firefox, Mozilla is preparing Download Day 2008: a campaign to set a world record for the most software downloaded in 24 hours. Participants are asked to pledge to download Firefox 3 on the day that it's launched. The exact date hasn't been scheduled yet, but everything seems on track for June."

40 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Perhaps not the cleverest plan... by Apatharch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they trying to kill their own servers or what?

    1. Re:Perhaps not the cleverest plan... by QuantumPete · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's like inviting a DDOS attack. I suppose it has the dual merit of setting world record and testing their server capacity.

      --
      QuantumPete
    2. Re:Perhaps not the cleverest plan... by darkpixel2k · · Score: 4, Funny

      and testing their server capacity.

      while /bin/true; do wget -c http://download.mozilla.com/whatever/firefox-3.0.0-is-awesome.tar.gz; done

      Well--I'm ready to help them meet their goal. ;)

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  2. Patch Tuesday by pjt33 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's the current record? I'd expect MS service packs to set a pretty high bar. Also, how are they counting? If Debian get Firefox 3 through into testing on the day (which I doubt), would an install via aptitude count, or are they only counting direct downloads from Mozilla?

    1. Re:Patch Tuesday by Crock23A · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet WOW patches are high ranking.

    2. Re:Patch Tuesday by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for Microsoft service packs, should a patch really count? They are Software. So if they want to set a world record for the most software downloaded in 24 hours of course service packs count.
      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    3. Re:Patch Tuesday by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bet WOW patches are high ranking.
      I bet not. How many Windows users are there? What percentage of those Windows users play WOW? (Hint: it's probably not even a majority.)
    4. Re:Patch Tuesday by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would suspect "software downloads" would imply an independent application and not a patch or a service pack. I'm sure they have their servers prepared to get Slashdotted and Digged, etc for the marketing event. Though I wonder why Microsoft with it's money couldn't hire a marketing firm to think up something savvy like that for Internet Explorer.

      It would also be a great opportunity to promote bittorent as a mass downloading medium. Too bad it doesn't seem to be in the plan.

    5. Re:Patch Tuesday by EvilRyry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but people _need_ to download the WoW patches as soon as they come out to continue to feed their addictive whereas Windows users are usually (or should be) scared to download the newest service pack when it first comes out.

    6. Re:Patch Tuesday by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two words: Automatic Updates,

    7. Re:Patch Tuesday by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bittorent doesn't allow for tracking downloads. It's one of the things that really holds it back for general use for a lot of companies. For example, a lot of internet TV shows would LOVE to use bittorent to reduce their download overhead (which is HUGE), but how are they supposed to determine their "ratings" if they're not sure how many donwloads they've had? They used to talk a lot about this over at DLTV.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Patch Tuesday by pablomme · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. They say they're going for 5M downloads. Firefox 2 got 1.6M on its first day. Says so here

      --
      The state you are in while your HEAD is detached... - wait, what?
    9. Re:Patch Tuesday by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Four words: Turned off Automatic Updates.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Patch Tuesday by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three words: Unlike most people.

    11. Re:Patch Tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zero words:

  3. So guys... by thedrx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get your botnets ready :)

  4. Why would I have to "pledge" anything? by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since presumably my Firefox 2 will bug me to update to 3 as soon as it's released?

    Not to disparage Mozilla, but lately it seems like they've been a mite too concerned with press releases. They should release when it's ready, and we'll get it when we think it's ready. What's the big rush?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  5. followed by most rollbacks to version 2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    because many popular plugins are not 3.0 ready :-(

    1. Re:followed by most rollbacks to version 2... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would say that's untrue at this point. del.icio.us released their updated version, Web Developer, noscript, adblock and firebug is on FF3. In fact, I'd say most popular plugins have made the move.

    2. Re:followed by most rollbacks to version 2... by at_slashdot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Who cares about "popular" plugins, the point is that the plugins that _I_ need don't work. For example Google Sync.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    3. Re:followed by most rollbacks to version 2... by Bombria · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most plugins do work in 3.0. You just have to disable version checking in FF.

  6. big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... these are the same idiots that thought that a beta of windows vista was the single largest software download: http://labnol.blogspot.com/2006/06/windows-vista-for-guinness-world.html

    show of hands: who downloaded a linux dvd iso larger than 3.5 gigabytes before vista beta was released? ... and apparently there is no "world record" to break anyway: http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/05/mozillas-latest-firefox-launch.html

    and, are they not going to consider the millions of copies of, say, internet explorer 7, downloaded the first day it was forced through as an automatic update? or how many downloads of itunes are there in a day when apple _requires_ an update?

  7. Yeah! by SpanishInquisition0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go for the record Mozilla! If you get it, you might even get a place right next to the Most Marshmallows Stuffed Into A Person's Mouth record!

  8. Re:I pledge not to download it by anboni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You clearly haven't worked with Fx3 yet. At first I was skeptical about the new smart bookmarks and address bar, but now that I've used it for a month or two (starting with beta 2) I'm quite pleased with it. The address bar basically does exactly the same as it always has, except now it actually does an on the fly substring search in your history instead of just giving an arbitrarily sorted list of previously visited sites. I would dare say this is one of the biggest improvements to the web browsing experience in the last several years.

  9. Re:I pledge not to download it by Fallus+Shempus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Weird, I have the release candidate, you know you can still actually use as a location bar and ignore the search, it still drops down and give suggestions of previously typed in URLs

    Don't see the problem

  10. I'm not committing to anything. by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not getting the release until I know for sure it won't crash hard on my Macs, like the beta I tried did. And that it won't delete my cookies, like the beta did.

    I'd really like to see continued support for the old style of searching in the url bar, too, but I doubt that will happen. And the new look is just uglier.

    1. Re:I'm not committing to anything. by Rurik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, that's why they have a "release candidate", which is now available. The betas are over and done with. And, I hope, as a beta user that you submitted your issues for them to be addressed and resolved.

      So... instead of wondering if it will crash, why not find out?

  11. 100% turn out from north Korea by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Look, all 18 computer uses have pledged.

  12. Re:I pledge not to download it by netsharc · · Score: 4, Informative

    And something Opera invented first! (Among other things like tabbed browsing, mouse gestures in a browser, a zoom feature that also resizes images, etc, etc.). And Opera 9.50 even searches the contents of pages you have visited for more WIN.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  13. Only the windows downloads by poeidon1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    will be counted most probably. I dont know of many linux users who download directly from mozilla website. Most would use a package from their distribution which generally is not available on the same day (and even if it is, how will they count those downloads).

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
  14. "The worst PR is no PR." by Sturdy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they set a record - they'll be in the news.

    If they are so successful that the servers go down temporarily - they'll definitely be in the news.

    As you can see, just submitting the idea has put them in the news. This is a great idea for a company with growing market share.

  15. Re:I pledge not to download it by Zebedeu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A not only history, it also searches your bookmarks, which is something that I've always wondered why it wasn't implemented before.

    Now you don't have to navigate your deep bookmark folders for that link, just start typing the name and it appears directly under your cursor.

  16. Make a big circle with a big marker. by BForrester · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm marking "Download Day" on my calendar right now.

    I have a big circle around 2008, and a thin one around 2009 too, just in case the news gets any more vague.

  17. Press = good by Nerdposeur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to disparage Mozilla, but lately it seems like they've been a mite too concerned with press releases.

    I think this is a cool idea. There are still lots of people who don't know there are other browsers in existence; when they open IE they say they're opening "the internet." Anything that makes the news and makes them aware of alternate browsers is good - especially if it's "hey this thing is really popular." For many people, that's the best argument for trying it.

    Mozilla seems to have done pretty well by harnessing the power of fanatic users so far - remember the big newspaper ads? And check out the "pledge map" on the site. Think how proud you'd be to see that you're one of a very few people in your country who has pledged to download it. Kind of a mix of national pride and geek pride.

    Every web developer's dream is a world where all users have more standards-compliant browsers, and IE is forced to follow suit. I say hooray for almost anything that makes that closer to reality.
  18. Re:I pledge not to download it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ya, and by the same logic, if firefox is so damn good, why does the IE has 75% marketshare.

    captcha: divisive

  19. Re:I pledge not to download it by Tychon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, I've been using Fx3 since beta1. I still am not really keen on the thing. Unless I make sure to keep my bookmarks and history trimmed down, it freezes my system for a few seconds as it trudges through things. This is irritating, especially when I was just wanting to type in an address real quick and not have possible matches pulled up. It consumes more time in searching for possible results than it saves me in typing.

    Some way of reverting to the old functionality would be nice.

  20. Opera publicity? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Opera has so many great features so far ahead of everyone else, why is its usage still somewhere around 1% on a good day? If Opera can figure that out, maybe they'd get somewhere.

    Maybe they need more silly publicity stunts like this one.

  21. Re:Why should we? by Kattspya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's the most brilliant thing I've seen in it so far (I've used the portable beta 3 for about an hour). When the password prompt isn't a window you can make sure the pasword is correct before storing it.

  22. How 12 words equal 0 words by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I Auto Installed SP3 and now my computer is a useless brick!

  23. Re:more than just publicity by Laebshade · · Score: 3, Informative

    #3 isn't wrong. It doesn't have an addon/extension system. Built-in customization features do not count. Opera has no where near the extensibility of Firefox.

    Don't get me wrong, I like Opera. I use it at work because it has the most compatibility with the websites I have to use without being IE. It's very fast and has a small footprint, CPU and memory-wise, but I just can't use it for my everyday surfing, simply because it lacks the ability to extend/support addons. The main addon I can't live without is adblock plus. Yes, I know Opera can do ad blocking, but who wants to add them by editing a file? And don't forget, adblock plus has pre-defined adblock list sources, so you don't even have to build your own just to get a decent amount of ads blocked; the list does it automatically.

    Living without something like Adblock Plus is a deal breaker when using a browser.