T-Mobile Sues Starbucks Over Free Wi-Fi Deal
Glenn Fleishman writes "T-Mobile sent me the text of a lawsuit they filed yesterday against Starbucks. The telecom firm alleges that Starbucks didn't involve it in any discussions to launch their free loyalty program Wi-Fi service this week with AT&T. AT&T is gradually taking over hot-spot operation from T-Mobile, market by market over the course of 2008. T-Mobile told me Starbucks is essentially giving away something that isn't theirs. T-Mobile has sued to halt the two-hours-a-day of free service, and is asking for money to cover losses. This might sound like sour grapes, but T-Mobile still operates most of the network, and says that the terms to which they agreed with Starbucks and AT&T for the transition and with AT&T for bilateral roaming don't cover this situation at all. Maybe free access in exchange for buying a cup of joe every 30 days was too good to be true (this soon)."
T-Mobile sent me the text of a lawsuit they filed yesterday
Just wait, they'll charge you 50 cents for that too.
'Thanks' for the 'explanation'. I've often 'wondered' how 'free wifi' 'worked' in 'restaurants' and the 'like'. I 'find' it surprising that 'satellite' is still used for 'inventory' 'systems'.
I'm normally all for the tiresome parsing of other people's statements in ways that they clearly did not intend, but you are really pushing it here.
Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
I have no idea what you are doing here. You should be off having sex with animals, which - by your argument - the law has been allowing you to do for years now. (See parents SlashID and E-Mail address if this sounds like it comes from the ether.)
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
LOL what's a demographic?
Sent from my iPhone
Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.