Slashdot Mirror


UK Can Now Hold People Without Charge For 42 Days

the_leander writes "Prime Minister Gordon Brown has narrowly won a House of Commons vote on extending the maximum time police can hold terror suspects to 42 days. There is talk of compensation packages available for the falsely accused. The chances of you getting that money however are slim to none, lets not forget, this is the same country that charges prisoners who have been falsely accused for bed and boarding costs."

26 of 650 comments (clear)

  1. The Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that 42 in base 13?

    1. Re:The Question by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nobody makes jokes in base 13...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:The Question by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny

      Va Fbivrg Ehffvn, onfr 13 rapelcgf wbxrf.

    3. Re:The Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nobody makes jokes in base 13... Your assertion is baseless..
    4. Re:The Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Depends on where you live. If you happen to live in the US, well, then I can only say, I'm happy to have met you before your relocation to a certain bay. Well, you could always escape from that bay then travel through the south with NPH and smoke weed laced with coke with a certain leader and get a pardon...
    5. Re:The Question by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that 42 in base 13?

      Does it matter? All your bases belong to UK govt.

  2. At least... by NoobixCube · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least the English know not to do something like Guantanamo Bay. They tried that 220 years ago, and created Australia.

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    1. Re:At least... by invader_vim · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you're saying that in 200 years, the descendants of the Guantanamo Bay inmates are going to thrash the Americans at all their sports?

  3. Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The answer to life, the universe and everything now includes the number of days the UK can hold you without charges.

  4. Billing the prisoners by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did they pass the bill for charging prisoners for their Information Retrieval Procedures yet? Is that next week?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  5. Re:With two words, I destroy your argument by ender81b · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, obviously, do not condone the actions of things like guantanomo bay or abu whatever-the-fuck. With that said, isolate incidents are isolated incident (abu ghraib being a really good example, yeah a ton fo people fucked up, but it's not a policy of the united states to do the things that were do at abu ghraib). The fact is, it reminds against the law to withold someone without charges for more than 48 hours if they are a citizen.

    IN the UK they can detain you for 42 days.. if you are a citizen.. with no charges. I find the implications disturbing.

  6. 42 days by elmartinos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like the Brits finally have acknowledged that 42 is the answer to everything.

  7. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by iworm · · Score: 3, Funny

    You asked: "What do your lords use for guidance over there?"

    The answer is "whether or not they had a jolly good lunch at the club."

  8. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by kraut · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Yes! You know who else was part of that fine tradition? Stalin, Hitler, Mussolin
    All three renowned for being upstanding members of the house of Lords?

    --
    no taxation without representation!
  9. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Though as a Tory and programmer I think it's like a very old piece of code which has been patched for a long time, hard to understand but for good reasons. "

    So essentially you're saying it is like Microsoft Windows. That should go down well here.

    --
    "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
  10. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by ksb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah someone with some knowledge, spoilsport, just as this thread was dipping into comparisons between the House of Lords and The Nazi party ;)

  11. Gordon Brown should be shot by damburger · · Score: 2, Funny

    See you all in 42 days...

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  12. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by alan.briolat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow - I think that is the only time I've ever seen somebody try to trump tabloid "evidence" with a blog post...

    Not saying that I disagree with the point that the Daily Mail is junk =)

    --
    I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
  13. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    So essentially you're saying it is like Microsoft Windows. That should go down well here.

    Well, let's rewrite the analogy in more /. terms. The Americans - and many other countries - have monolithic constitutions. Ours is modular - a mass of different reform acts and statutes and precedents, on top of the Monarch E2 microconstitution. Britain's running on Hurd, thank you very much.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  14. Re:Slashdot, as usual, can't wait to bash Britain. by hldn · · Score: 2, Funny

    hey im from bumfuck, iowa you insensitive clod.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  15. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by jimdread · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only after the bill has passed both houses does it then go to Her Majesty The Queen for Royal Ascent.

    Is Royal Ascent when the Queen climbs on top of the bill? Or did you mean Royal Assent?

  16. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by Stooshie · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Yes! You know who else was part of that fine tradition? Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini ...

    No they weren't, they had no sanity checks by a second chamber.

    By the way, Hitler was elected by the popular vote by spouting populist nonsense.

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  17. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by mpe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm for this 42 day thing myself.

    See you in 42 days then :)

  18. Re:Slashdot, as usual, can't wait to bash Britain. by MagdJTK · · Score: 2, Funny

    To hell with facts, let's just post grossly misrepresented stories. Exactly. The article even states that the bill hasn't gone through the Lords in the third paragraph.

    Still doesn't stop some idiot Yank from going on about how we're all fellating Big Brother (while his government pays someone to urinate on a naked human pyramid of "unlawful combatants").

  19. Re:Jumping the gun a bit.... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Douglas Hurd? That explains a lot...

  20. Re:You may have violated the DMCA by decoding... by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yet more evidence that farming is a danger to our society and way of life and should be stamped out at all costs.