Slashdot Mirror


Google Browser Sync To Be Discontinued

Dude With An Afro writes "What could have been a great Google project is now history. For those who never used it, Google Browser Sync was a Firefox extension that synchronized your bookmarks, web history, browser sessions and passwords across multiple computers by temporarily saving them to Google's servers. According to the Google Browser Sync team: 'It was a tough call, but we decided to phase out support for Browser Sync. Since the team has moved on to other projects that are keeping them busy, we don't have time to update the extension to work with Firefox 3 or to continue to maintain it.' For all of those who fell in love with Google's Browser Sync, our only hope now is to resort to poorly maintained 3rd party extensions without Google's blessing." While it was undoubtedly a useful utility, the argument can also be made that it wasn't the most secure extension in the world, what with having your personal data kept on Google's servers and shot around the internet.

28 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Fear not... by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

    the newly released Opera 9.5 has introduced a sync'ing capability.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Fear not... by Ambush+Commander · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have mod points, but I have to point out here that Opera Sync currently only works with your bookmarks and your speed dial, making it Opera's built-in equivalent of Foxmarks (which I myself have been using happily). It is no Google Browser Sync replacement.

    2. Re:Fear not... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Informative

      FEBE is what works for me,and it does so much more than simple bookmarks. I can save my preferences,themes,passwords,extensions,search history,etc. I simply save it to a folder and keep it on my flash drive. And if you need access from anywhere simply make a password protected zip folder or self extracting password protected .exe and email it to yourself. Then you have everything in an easy to use form without worrying about it being a security risk. But that is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Re:and in other news by matsuva · · Score: 2, Informative

    Foxmarks works fine for me.

  3. Foxmarks is great by JoelMeow · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think it's a little mean to refer to Foxmarks as a "poorly maintained 3rd party extension." I've been using it since before Google's browser sync existed, and I never bothered to try out Google's extension because Foxmarks worked perfectly. If you need a replacement, I would recommend checking them out.

    1. Re:Foxmarks is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've been looking for a cross-platform, cross-browser solution for ages, and I found Online-Bookmarks suits my needs perfectly. If you have your own server, its a breeze to set up and import.

      Foxmarks is a pretty good alternative, yes, for those who use only Firefox on all their boxes.

    2. Re:Foxmarks is great by AySz88 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed, the Google message actually recommends Foxmarks, if you read the article. It also recommends Mozilla Weave and Google Toolbar as bookmark-syncing alternatives (well, once Google Toolbar gets Firefox 3 compatibility). Mozilla Weave might not even be considered "third party".

      That terminating single quote in the summary is awfully easy to miss... (Bad submitter, bad!)

    3. Re:Foxmarks is great by PLBogen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to use Google Bookmark Sync and I was constantly fighting mis-syncs, and link duplication. When I switched to FF3, I needed a replacement and found Weave. It has been fantastic. I have none of the troubles I had with Bookmark Sync and I am glad I switched.

    4. Re:Foxmarks is great by rearden · · Score: 2, Informative

      My issue with Foxmarks is that it does not do everything that Google Browser Sync does. Having an encrypted copy of my passwords and bookmarks and cookies was nice. I dont save banking or high-security passwords anyway, but all of those fourm and other site usernames & passwords- nice!

      Google Browser Sync you will be missed!

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Foxmarks is great by Niten · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think it's a little mean to refer to Foxmarks as a "poorly maintained 3rd party extension."

      Yeah, that comment reeks of spite and ignorance. It also glosses over the privacy issues that kept many from using Google Browser Sync to begin with, but which aren't an issue with Foxmarks.

      And anyway, I'm much more willing to trust Foxmarks to store my private data than I am Google -- unlike Google, Foxmarks is not one of the world's fastest-growing advertising companies; and unlike Google, Foxmarks is founded by Mitch Kapor, one of the co-founders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Better still, the Foxmarks extension allows you to use your own server for synchronization, if you're so paranoid that you don't even trust your data in the hands of an EFF founder.

      If anything can be called a "poorly maintained 3rd party extension" here, it would have to be Google Browser Sync -- which, I suppose, is why it has fallen out of favor.

  4. Sync and Sort? by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using Bookmarks Sync and Sort for quite a while now - all you need is a FTP/WebDAV server on which you have an account, which I guess every slashdotter should have...
    The extension does everything I need, and it works like a charm; the only problem is that is not (currently) FF3 compatible.

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
  5. Re:Alternatives? by seriv · · Score: 5, Informative

    Look into foxmarks (assuming you use firefox). It works decently well, and it has firefox 3 support. I never switched to Google's thing, because foxmarks seemed better.

  6. Mozilla Weave is working great for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://labs.mozilla.com/featured-projects/#weave

    Syncs lots of things, including bookmarks.

  7. Mozilla Weave by beezly · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mozilla Weave does similar stuff... http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/12/introducing-weave/

    I've been using it for a while and it's pretty good, even though it's still under lots of development.

  8. Re:I want my own by goaliemn · · Score: 3, Informative

    check foxmarks you can tell it where to ftp your bookmarks to if you don't want to use their servers.

  9. Mozilla Weave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I switched to the Mozilla Weave project, and its been working great when the servers stay up. Provides most of the same features of google sync. http://labs.mozilla.com/featured-projects/

  10. Weave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Foxmarks is by no means poorly maintained, even as a non-paying user they provided excellent support when I had a problem. And if you are concerned about your privacy, there will soon be a good enough version of Weave which encrypts your information before uploading it to Mozilla's servers and is completely open source.

  11. Re:Roboform2Go by BlenderFX · · Score: 2, Informative

    So you are suggesting we use a Windows-only application? Thanks, but no thanks!

  12. Re:Alternatives? by dissy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Look into foxmarks [foxmarks.com] (assuming you use firefox). It works decently well, and it has firefox 3 support. I never switched to Google's thing, because foxmarks seemed better. From the URL there, it appears all foxmarks can do is sync your bookmarks.

    The reason googles sync is/was better is because it not only does the one thing (everything) foxmarks does, but it also syncs your firefox cookies, saved passwords (very important one that!) and your history.

    What I would like is a firefox extension that does basically what google browser sync does, except you can point it to a server of your own, and the backend software is available to install.

    There are a few extensions that can sync only your bookmarks to a server you can run yourself, mostly using open standard protocols, but nothing that will sync everything, including your saved passwords and cookies.
  13. So just go back to the "old school" solution... by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least in FireFox, your bookmarks just exist as a plain ol' HTML file in your profile directory. You don't need any special tools to sync that across multiple machines, you just copy it between machines (or better, use FireFox Portable off a thumbdrive).

    However, for those who really need their bookmarks accessible from anywhere, an old and simple method will completely solve your problem - Keep your bookmarks on a live website and set that to your homepage. When you want to add new ones, add them to the online version rather than locally. Problem solved, no help from Google required.

  14. Weave is the way forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Reading this http://labs.mozilla.com/2008/06/weave-status-update/ seems to indicate that all the functionality of Google Browser Sync will be available in Weave shortly after FF3 is released.

    So I'll be waiting until then to move to FF3.

    I wonder if some of the Google Browser Sync team are working on Weave ?

  15. Re:Alternatives? by Bieeanda · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the URL there, it appears all foxmarks can do is sync your bookmarks.
    ...and from the question the grandparent post asked, bookmark synching was all that he wanted to do.
  16. Re:Alternatives? by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 3, Informative
    Did you even bother to read the grandparent post?

    The only part of it I use actively is the bookmarks sync, which is, although slightly buggy, very useful

    So what other bookmark-sync should I switch to?
    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  17. Interesting tool, but flawed... by shanen · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was a heavy user of GBS for a while. Very nice tool, but they never did fix very problematic bugs in the bookmark syncing part of it. I almost immediately gave up on the windows syncing, and I had fairly quickly stopped using the cookie-syncing part when I discovered the cookies were breeding like coat hangers in a closet. Essentially there was too much state information that wasn't been tracked but which was needed to make things work properly, especially for the bookmarks.

    As noted by many others, Foxmarks does a good job of the bookmark part of syncing. The heuristics are kind of flawed, but it's never caused the kinds of bookmark disasters that were frequent with GBS.

    The last feature of GBS that I abandoned was the password syncing. This was an extremely useful capability and (AFaIK) unique to GBS. I'm not sure it was working correctly, but rather it may have had some of the same problems as the bookmark syncing, but less severe, perhaps because of the absence of dividers or more consistency in the way different versions handled the passwords. However, this may have been the security-related problem that caused Google to abandon the idea. The security model was actually very good (if I understand it properly). The encryption and decryption were handled on the client side, and Google's servers actually had no access to the data, just storing the encrypted files. You were the sole owner of your security key--and many people then proceeded to lose it and then complained to Google about the 'lost' data. (I think Google should have tried to set up some kind of key escrow service, but I don't blame them for steering clear of that difficult business.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  18. Re:This makes me cry... by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mozilla is actually working on an extension called Weave that essentially does everything it sounds like GBS did. At least, I know it syncs bookmarks, history, and cookies, and other things.

    --
    All your base are belong to Wii.
  19. Re:Bookmark sharing without using third party serv by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Its kind of amazing how the ability to share bookmarks between multiple computers by simply using the same bookmarks.htm file has been removed with the new bookmarking system in Firefox 3.
    "

    What the ...? I'm using FF 3 and this still works. Mod parent overrated.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  20. Re:This makes me cry... by pgn674 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mozilla is actually working on an extension called Weave that essentially does everything it sounds like GBS did. At least, I know it syncs bookmarks, history, and cookies, and other things. Google Browser Sync did: cookies, saved passwords, bookmarks, history, and tabs and windows. You could have it all be encrypted too, using an encryption key that Google would not know (you had to type it yourself at each computer when setting up).

    I've been using it for years now, since it first came out. I've gotten quite dependent on it; this is very sad news for me. Best part was I could be browsing on my desktop, then swing to my laptop and pull up a page I'd visited on the desktop from the laptop's history list. Google Browser Sync seemed to update very frequently, making switching between computers very fluidic.

    Well, I guess I'll have to try out some of the alternatives listed here and see if I can find something that lives up.
  21. Really? by sentientbrendan · · Score: 2, Informative

    >Since the team has moved on to other projects
    >that are keeping them busy, we don't have time
    >to update the extension to work with Firefox 3
    >or to continue to maintain it.'

    That hasn't stopped google from keeping *every other items in googles product lineup*.

    Seriously though, google has *way* too many products, many of which are buggy, feature incomplete, and in perpetual beta status. It is about time they trimmed the fat in a big way and focused on improving their successful products, rather than trying to have a dinky and ignored entry in every category.

    Personally, I use:
    1. Search
    2. Ads
    3. Gmail (still in beta and now falling behind the competition...)
    4. Reader (which, in terms of design, is probably the best google app ever)
    5. Google groups (pretty good, but could see a lot of improvement)
    6. Youtube (which has also fallen *way* behind the competition in terms of video resolution).

    These are the products they need to improve, instead of letting every engineer scratch his personal itch.