Slashdot Mirror


McCain Backs Nuclear Power

bagsc writes "Senator John McCain set out another branch of his energy policy agenda today, with a key point: 45 new nuclear power plants by 2030." So it finally appears that this discussion is back on the table. I'm curious how Nevada feels about this, as well as the Obama campaign. All it took was $4/gallon gas I guess. When it hits $5, I figure one of the campaigns will start to promote Perpetual Motion.

5 of 1,563 comments (clear)

  1. Nuclear is a great idea. by Meor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would support this and would allow it in my back yard.

  2. $5 a gallon? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Didn't you hear, opec has decided they pushed the bubble far enough and is going to scale back the 'waters testing'?

    We go thru this all the time with them, they push prices up to where they get worried we might actually go find an alternative, then bring it down just enough ( but higher then before ) to quiet us down and lose interest in alternatives.

    Its a cycle that most people are too stupid to see, and thus we are stuck in it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  3. I'm all for this, IF... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm all for this, if it includes research into IFR technology. If you haven't read this article, please do. I know it's biased toward IFR technology, but even if 10% of what the scientist says is true, we should be researching the hell out of it! Here's Wikipedia's take on the IFR.


    The current reactor design is antiquated and hobbled by President Carter's decree that we will not reprocess nuclear fuel. So instead of extracting 90+% of the energy in the fuel and having 100 year nuclear waste, we extract 2% and have 10,000 year waste with the once-thru fuel cycle. Real smart, Jimmy. And he was a 'Nucular Engineer'!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  4. Re:Seriously, WTF? by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Nuclear promotion? Good start. Let's hope they couple it with breeder reactors, to really stretch the fuel and decrease the waste.

    Also...let's start drilling for our own oil reserves!! We have bans on drilling off of the east coast, the west coast, and even the eastern part of the Gulf. We have the capability to drill safely these days. Who knows...we might hit the motherload like Brazil did recently that I hear of?

    We have TONS of shale oil that is starting to get cost efficient to process.

    Why not do all these that are possible now to help our oil needs WHILE putting tons of money and research into the other alternative fuels?? I'm excited about ramping up , wind, solar and biofuels (particularly the algae and other processes to make fuel out of waste)...but, we need more oil now to ease the pain till the switchover.

    In the US, we have got to get over the NIMBY. The gulf coast has carried the 'burden' for the drilling and refining for decades...we have to start having the whole country contribute...repeal the bans on drilling....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  5. Re:Seriously, WTF? by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doesn't matter, if it's still producing heat, it's still useful as fuel. Preprocess it into high-concentrations, and reburn it until all you have is lead, strontium and irradiated Iron! :-)