Slashdot Mirror


Via Debuts Mini-ITX 2.0

DeviceGuru writes "Via Technologies has launched the second generation of its signature mini-motherboard standard. Mini-ITX 2.0, an evolutionary update to the seven-year-old 170×170mm form-factor, introduces new and emerging buses and interfaces such as PCI Express, SATA, Gig-E, and HD A/V, while preserving backwards-compatibility with the original standard. Mini-ITX has been a popular form-factor for a range of space-constrained hobbyist and commercial applications."

93 comments

  1. Space-constrained? by ThePhilips · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mini-ITX has been a popular form-factor for a range of space-constrained hobbyist and commercial applications.

    I have one at home not because I'm "space-constrained" - but because it really nice and small Linux server which does everything I nee from it.

    Thanks to fanless design, loudest part of the rig is hard drive. That, along with minimalistic power consumption, makes it very suitable for always-on system. I use it for back-ups and some performance-oriented development and it is just bliss.

    The only downside of buying Mini-ITX, is that it's very hard to find suitable components as well as good case. Selection isn't very wide and prices often bite.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:Space-constrained? by bunratty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard another downside to Mini-ITX is that the throughput of the gigabit Ethernet ports is not up to speed with the ports on full-size computers. Has the situation improved? Will it be better with Mini-ITX 2.0? That's the first thing I looked for in TFA and the "more information" link it provided, but all they say is it has a gig-E port.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hard to find a suitable case?, hell I seen people throw these suckers in Pumpkins and Foster Mini-kegs.
       

    3. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a pity that VIA is not able or willing to work with the Linux community.
      Despite all their PR noise.

    4. Re:Space-constrained? by Collective+0-0009 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      it's very hard to find suitable components as well as good case. That is the great thing about ITX, all you need for a case is an old VCR, old Hummer RC car, or I even made a computer out of an old CRT monitor shell, and put an LCD in the front.... sort of an iPC.

      ITX is designed to think outside the box (case).
      --
      I finally updated my sig, but now it's lame.
    5. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but it's not a *popular* choice for a Linux server.

    6. Re:Space-constrained? by Dwedit · · Score: 3, Informative

      That has more to do with using crappy chipsets in the motherboard than the form factor itself.

    7. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then clearly we have nothing to fear with VIA, right? ;)

      </sarcasm>

    8. Re:Space-constrained? by cloakable · · Score: 1

      I'm using a C7 Mini-ITX in my home server. It may be more popular than you think.

      (The loudest bit in my rig is the 2U PSU - I really want to get a quieter one sometime.)

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
    9. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? How do you secure it inside those?

    10. Re:Space-constrained? by Splab · · Score: 1

      What purpose could an mini-ITX have in your environment where a throughput above 10MB/s is needed?

      To stream DVD you need 8Mb/s, to stream Blue ray you need around 50Mb/s. If it acts as a high availability file server for multiple users you are doing it wrong anyways.

      Even if you only get 50% of a Gig-E you can (theoretically) sustain playback of 10 Blue ray movies, everything else will give up in the system long before the network is maxed out.

    11. Re:Space-constrained? by bunratty · · Score: 1

      I suppose if they used those crappy chipsets with Mini-ITX 1.0, they'll continue to use them with Mini-ITX 2.0. I wonder why they can't simply use a decent chipset? There are small form factor computers available for a few hundred dollars, as well as tiny laptops, that have decent gigabit ports. Certainly price, size, and power consumption are not a barrier. Oh, well, I'll wait for a decent Mini-ITX 2.0 board that uses good chipsets and comes with a warranty. Until then, small form factor will have to do.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    12. Re:Space-constrained? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      older boards used pci for the gig-e ports newchips have gig-e as part of the chip set or are running it over pci-e.

    13. Re:Space-constrained? by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      How is it for EMI/RFI in those enclosures (I'm guessing the VCR is not so bad as long as you maintained original shielding).

    14. Re:Space-constrained? by billcopc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The reason they use crappy chipsets is because they're cheaper than the good stuff, and Mini-ITX is primarily about money, secondly about size.

      I mostly stopped caring about Mini-ITX when I realized I could gut a low-end laptop for less money and better performance than Via's offerings. Their prices just aren't in line with my perception of value. There are also several alternatives on the market, most of them based on Intel mobile chipsets, like the Arcom Apollo.

      If I wanted something even smaller, there's the Gumstix/Netstix. This Mini-ITX 2.0 seems like a whole lotta nothing, too late to market, too costly to care.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    15. Re:Space-constrained? by billcopc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, if the chipsets were any decent, people would build file servers around them. The biggest (*rimshot*) thing going for Mini-ITX is the low power consumption. If I could replace my two home servers with smaller machines that draw a third of the power, yet can adequately serve my media and backup needs, I would spend the money.

      The problem is Mini-ITX does everything poorly. Terrible performance, overpriced accessories, usually lots of modding work to get things fitted, and you have to pay a premium for the privilege of being mediocre.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    16. Re:Space-constrained? by confused+one · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are mini-itx boards using intel and other non-via chipsets. You don't have to buy a via mini-itx board. MSI, Jetway, Intel, Commell and others make mini-itx boards and they are available several different cpu socket / chipset combinations, just like ATX boards are. There are limits of course, some things just dont's fit on a 7"x7" board, not to mention power and cooling requirements for some chips would be difficult to accomodate.

    17. Re:Space-constrained? by CaptDeuce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mini-ITX has been a popular form-factor for a range of space-constrained hobbyist and commercial applications.
      I have one at home not because I'm "space-constrained" - but because it really nice and small Linux server which does everything I nee from it.

      "Nee"? Collect shrubbery, do you?

      --
      "Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein
    18. Re:Space-constrained? by Splab · · Score: 1

      But it does serve data fast enough to be a media center - I know this because lots of people do that. Also it can work fine as a backup server for small stuff like like a home.

      While I do agree on problems with getting it to fit I call BS on performance and accessories. Everything is standard compliant, please provide examples of overpriced accessories.

      You pay premium for low power and small size - and as a media machine VIA nano can perform as good or better than most med range PC's.

      I think your problem is you want it to do something it wasn't designed for and when it fails to do so you cry wolf.

    19. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mini-ITX is primarily about money

      I find that hard to believe, given that I can build a full-size desktop for less money than buying a typical mini-itx setup.

    20. Re:Space-constrained? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I store all of my software installation discs as ISOs on my fileserver. A hard drive being tremendously faster than an optical drive (among the plenty of other conveniences) would be completely negated by a slow throughput. For movies it doesn't matter - it's a single file that doesn't need a tremendous amount of bandwidth. Game installation on the other hand is painfully slow if the connection sucks - even a Fast Ethernet connection is pretty tedious for that kind of thing. I get pretty annoyed speed-wise if it drops below 20MB/s or so. Yes, I'm being picky, but Photoshop CS3 is slow enough to install without the help of bad connectivity.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    21. Re:Space-constrained? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Wouw... Just wouw...
      What kind of equipment do you have that can sustain those rates? Standard consumer grade hard disk drives can seldom sustain more than 60MB/s, my DVD drive does around 24MB/s - CDs are around 8MB/s - on a really good day(yes its above 20MB/s, but if 20 annoys you I'm assuming you are blasting away well above 100MB/s) . Also why are you reinstalling so often that less than 20MB/s is a problem?

    22. Re:Space-constrained? by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      They have these nifty inventions that let you attach something to something else rather permanently. The most commonly used are called screws and bolts, less know things include glues and epoxys... If you're more adept, you can construct your own brackets and holders out of sheet metal.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    23. Re:Space-constrained? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      While I love the idea, and the flexibility, afforded by this form factor, I think the OP makes a valid point.

      I would LOVE to put a PC cleanly inside a 24oz Jolt can, peanut butter jar, or antique object d'art. I honestly don't have time for that crap and need a cheap enclosure that's ready to go.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    24. Re:Space-constrained? by Firehed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not going anywhere near saturating full gig-e, but 50-60MB/s (hard drive limited minus some network overhead) isn't unlikely. I'm not using a $20 bargin bin 5-port switch (I got a 16-port GigE D-link now), but even back when I was I still saw decent rates. I'll be interested to see if/how this changes tomorrow, as I just ordered 1.5TB of storage prompted by a Newegg special (it's been long overdue, even if it's overkill for the moment - I still have to micromanage the remaining space on my current disks), and the 750GB/32MB Samsungs reportedly transfer in the 90MB/s (!!) range thanks to stupidly dense platters. At that point it doesn't matter at all since the receiving computer's drive isn't fast enough.

      It's not the frequency of installation, it's just a matter of how long each one takes. Whether it's daily or annually, I still have to wait around for way too long when I'm doing it, and for those hefty installs, it's usually because it's something I need RIGHT NOW so waiting is a huge pita if not a serious problem.

      Also, you have to consider the seek times on hard drives versus a DVD drive. That's the big gain, not the maximum data throughput. Even if both the DVD and hard drive were limited to 20MB/s, I'd still have a seek time better by probably two orders of magnitude. For Photoshop, games, and other big installs that have thousands of tiny files for textures or whatever, it's the seek time that kills the transfer speed. However if I alleviate that issue by ripping the disc to an ISO on my hard drive (and I do), a lot of that performance gain is lost if I throw it through a network bottleneck.

      Truth be told, it's largely overkill for my needs. But when I was setting it up, I had a little extra to spend and wanted it to be decently future-proof. Back to the original topic here, I had tried doing this on an EPIA board but the network controller was uselessly slow (by my standards) and as it's only got one PCI slot, a cheap-but-not-crap GigE card and a SATA board aren't both options.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    25. Re:Space-constrained? by ejecta · · Score: 1

      You may wish to consider these then, all the benefits of the low power Mini-ITX boards in a Micro-ATX size costing in some cases less than a third of the price.

      Via PC2500E: http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/empowered/pc2500_mainboard/index.jsp

      Via MM3500: http://www.megabuy.com.au/redirect.php?action=url&goto=www.via-mm.com%2Fproduct%2FVIA%2520Diamond%2520MM3500.jsp

      Both are DDR2 with SATA & PATA, the later having PCI-E support.

      --
      Two Parts Swash, One Part Buckle
    26. Re:Space-constrained? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      depends a bit on what you want to mount to but i'd imagine screws and studs would in general be the easiest way.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:Space-constrained? by kv9 · · Score: 1

      The reason they use crappy chipsets is because they're cheaper than the good stuff, and Mini-ITX is primarily about money, secondly about size. the reason they use crappy chipsets is because they're VIA.
    28. Re:Space-constrained? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Money for Via, not money in your pocket.

      Mini-ITX is expensive!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    29. Re:Space-constrained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I second this, I have a VIA Samuel 2 with this adapter and this picoPSU-120.

      Totally silent and enough for my 2 * 320GB disks. Running samba/nfs for my files and apache for my low traffic site.

  2. media centre by spandex_panda · · Score: 1

    I want to build a simple media centre and always on server for my house, I think a via board running at 1.5Ghz should do the job, viewing and recording SD tv, playing movies, serving files maybe mpd and stuff. Does anyone have a reason why this is a bad idea?

    --
    like phosphorescent desert buttons singing one familiar song
    1. Re:media centre by smertens · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm doing just fine with MythTV on a 1.0Ghz fanless board. I can record two SD shows at once while watching a third, all from a single hard drive. Just be sure to use the Openchrome video driver if you want playback to be watchable.

    2. Re:media centre by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remember to get a TV Tuner that does MPEG encoding onboard. For recording two shows at once, you'll need something like the Hauppauge WinTV PVR 500. With a card like this, your processor will hardly get used at all in the encoding process.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:media centre by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. I'm running KnoppMyth on a 700 MHz Celeron. Encoding is fine - the Hauppauge PVR-150 handles it without a hitch. The machine can just barely handle playback, but my MacBook makes a nice, fast frontend.

      I'll have to try your suggestion of video driver to see if it improves playback performance.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    4. Re:media centre by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's frightening. that you need the openchrome video driver to get SD video playable. These things have no chance in hell to play any HD video on them then.

      Why are they offering HD outputs whn the board cant ever hope to play HD content?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:media centre by smertens · · Score: 1

      It's clearly a driver issue of some sort - things go fast/slow/fast/slow if I use the default VIA drivers. Note that the board I'm using is very different (older) than what's being talked about in this article. It has a C7 processor, and uses the CN700 chipset, which has a built-in limit of 1024x1024 resolution for MPEG2 decoding. My board also does not have HD outputs, unless you count the analog VGA (I use the low-tech svideo to connect to my SDTV).

  3. Virtual Computing. by Vectronic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are they all 3D renderings?

    meh, excuse me... I just found it amusing... "VIA Debuts Mini-ITX 2.0"... and its just some 30 minute 3D model...

    Back on topic though, looks pretty kickass, if only it came with more PCIe slots, even just one more would do... 6.75"x6.75"... 3 of them could fit in the space your average keybaord takes (minus PSU)

    1. Re:Virtual Computing. by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

      meh, excuse me... I just found it amusing... "VIA Debuts Mini-ITX 2.0"... and its just some 30 minute 3D model...

      "Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor - not an electrical engineer!"

    2. Re:Virtual Computing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they all 3D renderings?

      meh, excuse me... I just found it amusing... "VIA Debuts Mini-ITX 2.0"... and its just some 30 minute 3D model...

      Back on topic though, looks pretty kickass, if only it came with more PCIe slots, even just one more would do... 6.75"x6.75"... 3 of them could fit in the space your average keybaord takes (minus PSU)

      You can include the power supply, too
      http://www.mini-box.com/s.nl/it.A/id.417/.f?sc=8&category=13
  4. Only problem is the PCI-E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used three boards of this form factor in my HTPC, from the original 800MHz Epia board up to a borad with HDMI and a dual-core socket M CPU. From an analog capture card, a hardware mpeg encoder, to a digital cable card. All in the same case with the same PCI riser card.

    It's great that the new standard is backwards compatible, but the main thing they changed is the PCI interface, and that's a change for the worse since I'm not aware of any capture cards that have PCI-E. In fact in most of the situations you'd use a Mini-ITX board you would not need the bandwidth of 16x PCI-E, and you WOULD want the ubiquity of PCI.

    Now, if they'd ship a risercard that turns the PCI-E back into PCI..

    1. Re:Only problem is the PCI-E by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Informative

      AverMedia M780 is a dual-tuner PCIe X1 card whose driver allows it to be used as a hardware MPEG decoder for DVD or Blu-Ray. Coincidentally, it gives the best reception of any card I've ever used. Unfortunately, as of right now it does not work under Linux, but a 1.5GHz C7 w/ 2GB of RAM and the onboard Via graphics is powerful enough to run Vista Ultimate edition with Aero turned on at S-Video or component video 480p resolution. Not that you'd actually use that particular OS. (Well, my HTPC is running it, but I got a free copy through my work MSDN subscription.) It's probably not powerful enough for 1080p, but you can install a discrete graphics card if you prefer.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  5. Re:what about big ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm a bit nostalgic too. I missed the old turbo button from the clone war days, so I spliced together a few case wires and velcroed my leaf blower in there.

  6. Skip DeviceGuru.com and go straight to the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go directly to VIA's website.

    Seriously, there's no ads on deviceguru's page so what's the fucking point?

  7. No article? Redirect to port 8080? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a redirect at http://www.deviceguru.com/2008/06/19/via-debuts-mini-itx-20/ but then nothing appears? WTF?

  8. This isn't exactly "fresh" by MC68040 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was announced on the 5th of this month, and already been featured on some news sites.

    Asides from that I like that we're getting an easy option for hdmi-out - it's one of the things that have been holding me back from using this in my sitting room :)

  9. Still not legacy free by jabuzz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is the point in shipping it with a PS/2 keyboard and mouse port. Complete waste of time. The space would be far more usefully be taken up with some more USB ports.

    Also how about some BIOS serial redirection on these things, so you don't have to plug in a monitor to configure these babies.

    1. Re:Still not legacy free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A PS/2 KVM switch is common when one uses more than one of these convenient little boards. USB KVM switching is not nearly as ubiquitous.

    2. Re:Still not legacy free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i find it ironic that in the one post you're complaining about ps2 ports, yet requesting something that would need a serial port

    3. Re:Still not legacy free by argent · · Score: 1

      You want to eliminate the legacy mouse and keyboard ports, but you want to keep the legacy serial port?

      No, really, I'm all in favor of both these innovations, I just wonder about the subject line...

    4. Re:Still not legacy free by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously he was really asking for something like IPMI enabled by default, that way we can get rid of the legacy serial port, ps/2 ports, and power button...

      --

      jh

    5. Re:Still not legacy free by kriston · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you get the boards based on the ATOM reference platform you will notice that it contains both serial and, get this, a PARALLEL port.

      Seriously, the parallel and serial ports are for embedded applications. It's much easier to use those 8 bits on the parallel port for dry contact control. And most small embedded controllers have serial interfaces.

      Why does it have to be legacy free? This is not supposed to be JUST a consumer computer platform.

      It's supposed to be both a consumer platform as well as an embedded platform and you can't be an embedded platform if you're legacy free.

      --

      Kriston

    6. Re:Still not legacy free by argent · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be legacy free?

      It doesn't. I just thought the subject line was ironic.

    7. Re:Still not legacy free by profplump · · Score: 1

      Serial is handy if you plan to integrate with other devices, (e.g. control your TV/lights/etc. from the HTPC).

      That being said, USB is plenty fast enough to drive a whole slew of serial ports, and you can get pretty good RS-232USB adapters for $20 or less (and cheap ones for $6 or less).

    8. Re:Still not legacy free by profplump · · Score: 1

      A parallel port is a lot of complication and pins to drive 8 contacts; for $20 you could build a board with real relays that have much better electrical isolation from the motherboard and a USB or serial interface. (And that's what it cost me in a one-off construction; presumably you could do it much cheaper en mass). In addition to avoiding the space dedicated to the connector you can avoid resetting the relays on reboot -- something you can't do if you're driving the relays directly.

    9. Re:Still not legacy free by bunratty · · Score: 1

      I have a PS/2 KVM switch and use it with servers that have only USB ports. Just buy a $10 PS/2 to USB splitter cable.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    10. Re:Still not legacy free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complete waste of time? The space could be better used ...? Come on, make up your mind.

    11. Re:Still not legacy free by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      I was all set to reply to your post by pointing out that PS/2 keyboards are $4, while USB keyboards are $60 or something. Then I checked at frys.com, and found USB keyboards for $10. I hadn't realized USB prices had come down so much. Still, a lot of individuals and businesses have huge piles of PS/2 keyboards sitting around that they'd like to be able to keep on using.

    12. Re:Still not legacy free by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes.
      Why? The PS/2 ports are only useful for using a PS/2 KVM which are cheap and common.
      There are MANY devices that only work with RS-232 ports. USB converts are on the whole junk and not very reliable.
      You will see these mini-ITX boards used a lot in embedded systems so yea I will lose the PS/2 port any day but please keep the come and lpt ports.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Still not legacy free by photon317 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am also in the "no PS/2, but please leave 1 serial port" camp. For a linux box (and what better use for ITX is there?), it's really nice to have serial console support so that you don't have to ever hook up a keyboard and monitor. It's even better if the BIOS supports serial console redirection, so that you can even edit bios settings over the serial interface.

      Until the BIOS guys come up with a way to do serial console over USB (which wouldn't be too hard really), I'd like the serial port to stay.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    14. Re:Still not legacy free by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``What is the point in shipping it with a PS/2 keyboard and mouse port. Complete waste of time. The space would be far more usefully be taken up with some more USB ports.''

      While you are welcome to your opinion, I am very happy with all the legacy ports on the motherboards. That way, I can use all the stuff I already have, instead of having to upgrade everything.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    15. Re:Still not legacy free by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Until the BIOS guys come up with a way to do serial console over USB (which wouldn't be too hard really), I'd like the serial port to stay.

      They seem to be angling more towards ethernet than USB Serial Class with ILM type stuff under $70 now. That's right about the point it becomes integrated into the chipset on better boards.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    16. Re:Still not legacy free by OutOnARock · · Score: 2, Funny



      Who would want to lose their "come" port?

      (ducks, its Friday :) )

    17. Re:Still not legacy free by kriston · · Score: 1

      Well, with the parallel port available, I don't need that extra $20 board. The point is that it's all in one component, whereas your board would not be.
      And if you're going through all the trouble of USB at that step you're already consuming an obscene amount of power in the design we are talking about when compared to a simple parallel, or even serial, port.

      --

      Kriston

    18. Re:Still not legacy free by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      When most people will be running a legacy OS on these such as Windows XP, which does not fully and properly support USB input devices properly, the lack of a keyboard can be problematic for actually using the board.

      Yes, it's an exception when a USB keyboard doesn't work, but I've seen it often enough to realize how much of a problem it'd be for a product targeted at picking up at least -some- of the people wanting to install Windows.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    19. Re:Still not legacy free by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      USB converts are on the whole junk and not very reliable.
      I have heard similar bad things about USB-PS2 converters. I have at least once found a keyboard that refused to work with the USB-PS2 converter I had (the keyboard worked fine on all motherboard PS2 ports I tried, the converter worked fine with another keyboard. My syspicion is that the converter was playing fast and loose with the specs of the PS2 interface but I never checked).

      so for those of us with existing PS2 kvm switches motherboards with PS2 ports are very attractive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    20. Re:Still not legacy free by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Except there are times when you need a real ISA/PCI serial port. A good example of which is a NTP reference clock. A USB to RS-232 adapter simply does not cut the mustard in this scenario.

    21. Re:Still not legacy free by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Would be nice, but it would have to be over a separate ethernet port. The shared ethernet port with two MAC stuff is unreliable junk.

      However few if any mini-ITX boards have a BMC, where as they all with the addition of a small amount of code in the BIOS could do a full serial console. There is no additional hardware cost involved, it is all software.

    22. Re:Still not legacy free by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I can see that but then the devices that I work with that use Com ports cast about $5000 to replace. Most kvm swithes are a lot cheaper. :)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  10. Maybe in stores by 2010 by soward · · Score: 1

    Great, maybe in a couple of years you can actually order and receive one. Still pretty much impossible to get any of their nano or pico products, and even the original mini stuff is scarce. VIA has a history of 'annoucements' and trade show demos, but actual product delivery seems to be problematic -- at least here in the states.

    --
    John Soward...University of Kentucky
    1. Re:Maybe in stores by 2010 by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      www.logicsupply.com

    2. Re:Maybe in stores by 2010 by kriston · · Score: 1

      Says you. I bought all my many VIA processors and processor/motherboard packages from more than a handful of US merchants within months of the announcement of their availability.

      --

      Kriston

    3. Re:Maybe in stores by 2010 by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Well, their reputation was tarnished by the C3 to C7 transition. They stopped production on the C3 because of a patent issue and promised the C7 would be available right away. Production problems pushed the C7 release out many months. So, for a while, all you could get from VIA was existing stock and promises.

    4. Re:Maybe in stores by 2010 by kriston · · Score: 1

      I was aware of bus patent issues with the C7 making it electrically incompatible but I wasn't aware of those problems halted the C3 socket-370.

      --

      Kriston

  11. old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    aehm VIA launched it some 2 weeks ago on Computex guys!
    this is oooooooooooooooold! who is doublechecking the new in these days?

  12. Personally I like.... by Gates82 · · Score: 1
    Personally I like simple, bullet proof, and dedicated ports for universal devices (lets not discuss boxes that only have power and network connectivity) but I wish they would move to a lot more breakouts that attach modularly to the case and plug in to the motherboard (like extra usb ports)

    Additionally this really looks more conceptual then already printing boards (no flashing links on via's website about this new format). The specs list min. 4 usb ports and 1 gig ethernet. So I see no guarantee that if it is actually fabbed that there will be PS/2 ports available.

    --
    So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's Sister?

  13. /.ed by legoman666 · · Score: 1

    Slashdotted. Anyone have a mirror?

    1. Re:/.ed by legoman666 · · Score: 1

      Scratch that, it's magically working now. I blame the commies.

  14. Why not link to VIA by Gates82 · · Score: 1
    DeviceGuru is adding little needed comentary to the official VIA post. So why are we linking to DG instead of VIA's official site? (I know this is slashdot, gotta keep peoples views up and gain them ad revenue) There is even a video link on via's main page about mini-ITX 2.0 (no that it is worth watching).

    --
    So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's Sister.

  15. Re:No article? Redirect to port 8080? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah seriously, if the link says http://blah.blah/ without a colon and "8080", it should be on port 80. There are lots of corporate firewalls that block 8080 because of proxying. The article should at least say it's a redirect.

  16. The processor is near the top right by kriston · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amazing. At first I was wondering if the 45-degree offset component would allow good airflow, thinking it is the processor, but it is not.

    After downloading the Image Kit I noticed that the processor is actually the little tiny component with "nano" stamped on it near the top right side of the board.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:The processor is near the top right by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      So what's the big offset component do, then? Don't tell me that's the chipset? I'd think such a large chipset would inhibit efficient power use beyond a certain point...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:The processor is near the top right by kriston · · Score: 1

      It's the northbridge, I believe.
      I have several motherboards that use this configuration including some nForce boards. I think it's to make the leads as short as possible without too much of that wasteful zig-zagging that equalizes their lengths.

      That's how some makers, like Dell, solved the problem of using AMD 64 processors on BTX boards (the BTX specification puts the processor too far away from the memory and moving the chipset at an angle leaves more room for memory leads since AMD puts the memory controller on the processor and Intel does not).

      --

      Kriston

  17. and the mirror is... by __aajbyc7391 · · Score: 1

    here :)

  18. an evolutionary update... by PRMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    an evolutionary update

    For definitions of Evolution that include 10,000 hours of Creation and Design...

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  19. But does it actually work? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The small form factor is all very well, but the previous generation of boards simply didn't do what they claimed to. HDTV and H.264 decoding in hardware are supposed to work, but are unsupported, for example.

    When you look at the high cost of these boards and the special cases and PSUs for them, combined with terrible performance (both CPU and components like gigabit ethernet or SATA) I can't see why anyone would want one. You can build a faster, cheaper and just as low power system using a cheap underclocked and undervolted Sempron and mATX mobo, with only a slightly larger (and much cheaper) case.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  20. Intel beat them at their own game by Fittysix · · Score: 1

    http://www.intel.com/products/motherboard/DG45FC/index.htm
    Intel chipset, HDMI, suppomodern core2 processors.

    Or if that's not your thing there's always the atom based version
    http://www.intel.com/products/motherboard/D945GCLF/index.htm

    --
    *.sig
  21. Re:but ..... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, it's a good question, actually. While VIA has long touted their support for Linux and open source, Real World results have often lagged behind. For example, various Linux drivers they have released have been one or more of buggy, closed source, and tied to forks of popular open-source projects. So, while Linux does actually run on all boards I have tried, not all hardware is _fully_ supported in practice.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  22. nano-ITX? What about pico-ITX? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I'm kid of curious why Via is't pushing their pico-ITX form factor much, instead putting more steam behind nano-ITX. It is substantially smaller - about the size of a deck of playing cards and (as I understand it) doesn't need nearly as much heat dissipation or power as the nano-ITX.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  23. you won't ever find, ECC RAM on VIA boards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why trust 'em for firewalls, fileservers, ANYthing except kiosks?

    Unless you're resetting it all the time ( scrubbing the RAM ), or powering if off after each use ( IOW, if you're using it for infrastructure ) you *cannot* trust it.

    They knew about this problem years ago, but don't give a damn.

    Go with blades: THEY are trustworthy.

  24. Re:but ..... by kriston · · Score: 1

    This is because VIA's technology is encumbered by the patents and trade secrets of the companies they acquired.

    S3, now owned by VIA, own several patents and trade secret IP in the video processors now known as VIA Unichrome. These are things like Savage, ProSavage, ViRGE, Vision, Aura, etc.

    A similar situation exists with the sound hardware with trade secret IP owned by IC Ensemble, also acquired by VIA.

    It's not as easy as it sounds.
    Sometimes this trade secret IP uses technology licensed from other companies. VIA does not have the right nor the ability to ethically release this information to the public.

    --

    Kriston