Real-World Firefox 3 Memory Usage Leads the Field
An anonymous reader writes "The author developed a program to snapshot memory usage per process every 3 seconds on Windows. Using this he recorded 3 hours of memory usage for five different browsers under real-world usage scenarios: Safari 3.1, Firefox 3, Flock 1.2 (a browser based on Firefox 2), Opera 9.5, and Internet Explorer 8. A million data points indicate that Firefox 3 has a surprising advantage over the other browsers tested. These are real-world tests and not contrived benchmarks."
You failed at failing, I applaud your skillz.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
LOL - mod parent +99 ... ;-)
Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
Shut up, twitter.
"You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
What's sad is that the more Twitter posts, the more sympathy I have for Vista. (although I've never used it)
This space up for sale.
no, that's "wllly hlll" - no "I's" in it, just "L's"
I second that. We need a "-1 Nobody cares that you hate twitter" mod.
http://www.mhall119.com
Funny because i currently use ubuntu hardy, which has sprung a pretty nasty memory leak in the NetworkManager, but it doesn't affect my uptime.
anyway mr not twitter, how come you know so much about where twitter does/doesn't work? I mean I now have reason to belive he works at MS and is a disgruntled ms-sql coder, but you were months ahead of the game with that comment.
IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
Wow, finally I found someone here in /. that understands how the AMD marketroids calculate their numbers...
There are at least four sacred cows here: AMD, Apple, Java, and Ruby, that no one can criticize, lest they lose mod points. That's why I always criticize them. Got karma to spare, so let's make those dumbasses to waste their modpoints, right? Otherwise, they might downmod some really important post...