Slashdot Mirror


Al-Qaeda's Growing Online Offensive

andy1307 brings us a story from the Washington Post about al-Qaeda's technological capabilities and the methods they use to protect themselves and their networks from opposing military forces. Quoting: "US and European intelligence officials attribute the al-Qaeda propaganda boom in part to the network's ability to establish a secure base in the ungoverned tribal areas of western Pakistan. Analysts said that as-Sahab (AQ's propaganda network) is outfitted with some of the best technology available. Editors and producers use ultralight Sony Vaio laptops and top-end video cameras. Files are protected using PGP, or Pretty Good Privacy, a virtually unbreakable form of encryption software that is also used by intelligence agencies around the world. [Al-Fajr, a propaganda distribution network] is heavily decentralized, with its webmasters generally unaware of one another's true identities for security reasons, intelligence analysts said. It also has separate 'brigades' devoted to hacking, multimedia, cybersecurity and distribution."

24 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Aw, c'mon. by leoofborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why *wouldn't* AQ have all this stuff? We pay $$$$$ to the house of sa'ud, some of that money makes it to Pakistan. We outsource and train people in that region of the world and expose them to the best tech we have here. Why wouldn't *some* of them have a hobby? The next thing the Washington Post fearmonkeys will tell us is they use PEX bittorrent, SSH, and twofish crypto. And they embed marching orders in Flash and Postscript files. [yawn] Next!!

    --
    --- See you at the Tannhäuser Gate.
    1. Re:Aw, c'mon. by Jellybob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You forgot selling pirated videos. Remember, BitTorrent supports terroists - always make sure you buy genuine DVDs.

  2. Evil hackers (yawn) by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't imagine that it's THAT hard to create a fairly distributed network of "propaganda" outlets with most of the key people using encryption, small laptops, mobile communications....you know, stuff that most folks on this site do every day. And most of us aren't internationally wanted fugitives.

  3. Bullshit by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just more made-up generalized bullshit to get the easily-influenced people to go with more government spending on counteracting the nonexistent problem of terrorism. When was the last time terrorism was in your back yard? When did it affect you personally? How often is it happening?

    And.. if it did affect you, chances are that your back yard is in Iraq..

    The government keeps pushing 'Our enemy is huge, organized, centralized, and powerful' but we are seeing more and more than 'Our enemy is a disorganized populace tired of what the US is doing.'

    It's like we're building a tank to try to destroy a wasp.. while the wasp keeps stinging everyone because we're sitting by its nest.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are a few thousand dead people from a few years back who, if they could be asked, would tell you that it's hardly a 'non-existant' problem. Is it being used to scare people for political reasons? Sure, just like most issues are bent to manipulate the sheeple. Is it real? Yes. Will they kill you if they can? Sure.

      The world isn't black and white, all or nothing.

    2. Re:Bullshit by Curtman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are a few thousand dead people from a few years back who, if they could be asked, would tell you that it's hardly a 'non-existant' problem.


      There's also a few hundred thousand dead people in another part of the world who would tell you to put things into perspective and realize which is the greater tragedy.

    3. Re:Bullshit by Znork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are a few thousand dead people from a few years back

      And since then, as many people have died in bathtub related accidents.

      it's hardly a 'non-existant' problem.

      Indeed. Neither are bathtubs. Almost 300 people die every year in bathtubs. Both terrorism and bathtub related fatalities are serious issues that need to have appropriate levels of funding.

      Will they kill you if they can?

      If any terrorists wanted to kill Americans they'd be selling oil to Americans. That would nail about 50K citizens every year, 20 times more efficient than blowing up random things.

      The world isn't black and white

      And in a greyscale world, 'terrorist killings' merit about the same level of attention as bathtub safety.

    4. Re:Bullshit by extrasolar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. The Sept 11 bombers were Muslim. (Using an outsider's definition, not getting what a real Muslim is just like I don't take pains to define a real Christian.)
      2. Anyone who bombed the US in the Sept 11 attacks hate the West.
      3. Therefore, all Muslims hate the West. Invalid

      Damn, guy, get yourself a couple of logic and critical thinking books before you start calling bullshit. Don't be stupid.

  4. the boogie man will get you by petes_PoV · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What this article boils down to is that the analysts (whose job it is to talk up any threat) reckon there's a guy up a mountain 10,000 miles away with a laptop and a video camera. He's downloaded some free software to encrypt his emails and that's a "propaganda boom".

    Now I realise it's the government's role to instill fear, uncertainty and doubt in the population but, if that's all they've got then I reckon we're all pretty safe.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:the boogie man will get you by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this is coming from a government that can't even catch organized gangs spamming and selling prescription drugs online....presumably where it is a LOT easier to follow the money trail.

      Nothing to see here.

  5. Don't miss the point. by myCopyWrong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tech is interesting but besides the bigger point:

    How has one man in a cave managed to outcommunicate the world's greatest communication society?

    He's winning because censorship always backfires. The censored party, no matter how wrong, gains an air of truth. The technology used to carry the message does not matter. Attacks on Al-Jazeera and websites were a terrible mistakes almost as bad as invading Iraq, torturing captives and legal immunity for contractors. We have acted as badly as our supposed Islamo-Fascist enemy and our talk about democracy, freedom of press and human dignity rings hollow.

    1. Re:Don't miss the point. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's winning because censorship always backfires.

      No, he's winning because it WORKS. Are you seriously claiming the west censors the muslims more than the muslims censor the west ?

      I'll just post a link to how "the economist" looks in a muslim nation :

      http://jturn.qem.se/2006/more-pictures-of-iranian-censorship/

      Terror works, and so does censorship. Using violence to advance a political position works. So what went wrong in the beginning in Iraq ? To little agressiveness on the american side. This whole rules of engagement thing.

      Al-qaeda on the other hand, placed bombs in a girls pre-school and detonated the bombs when american soldiers brought back a lost girl. 28 of the children died and both soldiers (and the girl they protected) survived.

      And somehow the western press means by "proportionalism" that the US should be less agressive, imagine. The Iraqis know perfectly well how muslims fight : kidnapping kids, wives and old people and executing them en masse in hopes of demoralizing an enemy, have been normal features of muslim conquests everywhere.

      All indigenous cultures of northern africa have been totally obliterated by islam : from the ancient egyptians (who still existed when the muslim caliph ordered the library of alexandria burnt down), to the pseudo-roman carthagens, to berbers and tons of other cultures.

      Terrorism works. Sooner or later other people will start catching up to this message.

    2. Re:Don't miss the point. by myCopyWrong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you seriously claiming the west censors the muslims more than the muslims censor the west ?

      I don't know what you mean by "the west" or by "muslims." The concepts are distractions used to justify things which are wrong. If we look down on censorship we must not practice it ourselves.

      When agents of the US government censor, torture and otherwise violate the US Constitution, enemies of the US can claim hypocrisy. The US must act better to be perceived as better. Principles are more important than "proportion". Conquest, censorship, torture and other lawless behavior is immoral and a losing strategy. Anyone can can point to it and say, "See here what US democracy, free trade, tolerance and liberty are all about."

    3. Re:Don't miss the point. by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thugs are thugs.

      Terrorists are thugs with brains.

      They plan their attacks. They calculate the victim's reactions, not the immediate body count. A terrorist's first goal is to control, murder is simply the means to an end.

      Education does not prevent terrorism, it actually helps people become better terrorists. You can't pull that shit off unless you're smart and have trained skills. It's a whole lot more complicated than just squeezing a trigger at anyone that's wearing a different kind of funny hat (or none at all). They have chemists, engineers, architects... it's like a government organization's evil twin, with all the same powers and none of the rules.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  6. Freedom protects freedom by mlwmohawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more I see this stuff the more I remember a philosophical point my history teacher told me once. In the revolutionary period, the "news papers" were far more attacking and had far more offensive rumors and accusations.

    Now we see freedom being abused to spread "their" propaganda better than "our" propaganda. Whether or not we have the monopoly of truth is debatable. However, we are in a fight here and the *only* way to win a war of ideas is the freedom of expression of these ideas and hope that your ideas win.

    As an american, I'm not sure our ideals, as currently practiced, will win. We have to do a better job of things. Al Qaeda is only winning the war of ideals because we, the western world, have turned its back on democracy and society in favor of raw and savage unregulated capitalism which is destroying our economies and an aggressive preemptive war strategy designed to suppress any dissent in foreign nations which is emptying our treasury.

    Suppressing information is not a way to win the hearts and minds of people, especially while we are doing such a bad job living up to our ideals.

    1. Re:Freedom protects freedom by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You make a good point, I would like to see more commentary that reflections the position that you take whilst at the same time acknowledging the risk and threat that we do face.

      Agreed!

      Like a disease, the threat of Islamic Fundamentalism will not go away, and if left to fester it will cause bigger problems for generations to come. This means we need to be continuously proactive about many things including our freedom of expression.

      Don't you mean: Like a disease, the threat of Fundamentalism will not go away, ...... Why pick on Islam? Fundamentalists of all flavors are absolutely ready to destroy the world to see their end game religious prophecy come true. As far as I can tell, religious fundamentalists are ALL bat shit crazy idiots with weapons. Scary stuff.

      Having said that, this article is empty. So "they" use free encryption software and the internet to commnicate, ok, I think I guessed that myself.

      It's not that the article is empty, it's using empty rhetoric to insinuate that AQ (?) is using sophisticated technology to fight their enemies. Oh noes, they are not a stupid bunch of idiots with rifles. OMG, they know about the Inernets!

      Simply put, it's fear mongering.

  7. Re:valid critique by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So asking for proof before buying into a scare campaign into which our tax dollars are being spent at an unprecedented rate is being dismissive? You, sir, represent the political apathy among the masses that allows government to get away with what it does.

    --
    I hate printers.
  8. Re:valid critique by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right. I, too, have a propaganda machine, as well as encryption and other scary things. I.e., I have a blog up at www.mrnaz.com and I use SSH from time to time.

    Scary.

    The article is suggesting that the US is getting their asses kicked not because that's actually what's happening, but becuase telling US citizens that that is what is happening will cause them to clamor for more tax dollars to be spent making rich defense industry shareholders even richer.

    Re: Not trying anything heavy handed? Are you freaking nuts? The most expensive military campaign in HISTORY is not heavy handed?

    As for proposing rights infringement, are you really that naive that it has to happen *in the same article*? So If you see one article scaring you about "terrorists using encryption" and then another about how police need to have more and more power to probe your private life, you're unable to put 2 and 2 together?

    I have no words.

    --
    I hate printers.
  9. Re:brxndxn GOT PWNED by brxndxn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    9/11 was 7 years, two clusterfuck wars, and $1trillion ago.. And it still was not in my back yard.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  10. Mission Accomplished by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To fight the Qaeda we must suspend the Constitution, take off our shoes and surrender our toothpaste getting on airplanes, invade Iraq (but not Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, but maybe Iran), pay $5 a gallon for gas. Rich people must pay no taxes, but everyone else must maximize oilcorp, pharmaco, telco, and bank profits, and hand Social Security and Medicare over to Wall Street. Free 12MPG Hummers for everyone with a credit rating, and subprime mortgages for everyone without one! Because that's the American Way that the terrorists hate us for.

    I feel safer already.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. Re:Editors-of-Evil by fictionpuss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if I just wanted to be a skeptical little shit, I could always just quote the parent and reply, "Yawn. Proof please. Next."

    Any time Al-Qaeda is mentioned, it is to sell copy or to push an agenda. Preferably both.

    When rights and statutes are being trampled upon all over the world with no proof that what we are giving up is worth less of that which we sacrifice, it is the duty of the populace to question their governance and its mouth, the media, in all its forms.

    If that makes me a skeptical little shit, then so be it.

  12. Absolute Rubbish by Karem+Lore · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I am sorry, I can not believe this utter rubbish. The US and UK governments can shutdown international bank accounts, can trace mobile phones, phones, internet connections. They can track the electricity usage of areas, they can use electro magnetic weaponry to take out computers, they can use heat source signature to identify target computers. In other words, if they use computer attached equipment, they know where you are and what you do. This story stinks, and so does the current US administration.

    Karem

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  13. There is no al qaeda by DragonTHC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's faceless monster created to give us a common enemy.

    it doesn't exist.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion