Slashdot Mirror


Geomicroblogging, Buzzword or Reality?

An anonymous reader writes "The iPhone 3G and Android devices are coming this year, opening the mobile world for rich applications, while sites like Fire Eagle and byNotes are ready to move your blogging habits into the geospatial world. Are we going to watch the next boom when those devices and geospatially enabled sites get combined? Sure, the posibilities this would open are endless, but are users going to embrace these services?" I don't see how it can't change the world ... it has 'Micro' and 'Blog' in the name, and I'll always know where I was when I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john.

159 comments

  1. buzzword hell. they just keep coming .... by unity100 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "geoonlinemicroshitting" - look ! we have another a new one ... "socialmicrobuttwaggling" whoops !! theres another one .... "cyberonlinepantsironing" - i guess there is no endin sight to this ....

    1. Re:buzzword hell. they just keep coming .... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just imagine...if we all had geospatially-enabled Slashdot: geommicroslashdotting!

    2. Re:buzzword hell. they just keep coming .... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      you're.... you're a VISIONARY!!

    3. Re:buzzword hell. they just keep coming .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N38.897663 W77.035747
      hey guise just thought I'd check in from my blackberrie. hope ur all havin a good time, gotta go sign a bill now
      - GWB

      (idiotnote: look it up in google maps)

  2. To answer the Headline: by phobos13013 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Buzzword, q.e.d.

    But seriously, I appreciate the majority of /.'ers who seem to champion privacy rights and issues, but whats the point of fighting for these rights if we are just going to turn around and voluntary post descriptions of our activities, locations of these activities, and photographic evidence with it? Sort of flys in the face of that mentality. Not to say that those who support our privacy rights are doing it, but it certainly undermines the fight...

    --
    ...and it should be known by now
    1. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Key word in there is VOLUNTARY...

    2. Re:To answer the Headline: by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You beat me to it. There is a world of difference between voluntarily giving your position and other information about you and your current activities, and the Government of Industry tracking your position and other information about your activities without the ability to opt out.

      That being said, I'm not interested. If I want people to know where I am going to be I'll tell them if they need to know, not post it or have some 'micro blog' tracking my every move. I don't need to blog it or broadcast it. Maybe I am showing my age but I am really finding all of this stuff to be getting increasingly silly.

    3. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Having consensual sex versus getting raped? What's the difference?

    4. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The slashbot is a highly hypocritical and paradoxical person.

    5. Re:To answer the Headline: by Kelbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd say there's an important difference in there. If person A wants to take a part of their personal life and make it public, that's up to them. The problem is when person A wants to keep something private and entity B decides that person A doesn't have a say in the matter.

    6. Re:To answer the Headline: by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Also, when Person A demands persons C-Z read there damn blathering.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:To answer the Headline: by rmadmin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I will have to agree with this. I could broadcast my life online too, but whats the point? No one in their right mind would give a flying shit what I waste all of my time on.

      7:00AM - Woke up
      7:10AM - Started coffee
      7:30AM - Drank some coffee
      8:00AM - At work
      9:00AM - Still at work
      10:00AM - Why are you still reading this?

    8. Re:To answer the Headline: by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I'd say there's an important difference in there. If person A wants to take a part of their personal life and make it public, that's up to them. The problem is when person A wants to keep something private and entity B decides that person A doesn't have a say in the matter."

      I think what the GP had in mind were not those people who are concerned about vountary vs. involuntary exposure, but the situation where a person wants their information to be concealed from only SOME people - eg. getting upset at employers who read Facebook profiles. Folks now have wider circles of people they are comfortable sharing privledged information with, but still don't want that information known by specific others. So where once a "secret" was information shared by a small number of trusted people, now we have information that is to be HIDDEN from a small number of UNTRUSTED people. This is a patent impossibility, but still people expect to be able to do it.

      My wife is a substitute teacher, and got a Facebook profile and added her nieces and nephews as friends. And now she knows to within a few days the exact time that one of them lost her virginity. How on EARTH she expected to keep that information from her family, while simultaneously allowing access to everyone who wanted to be her "friend" is beyond me, but I do know that she wanted it kept secret - her profile page was sanitized shortly after my wife joined.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:To answer the Headline: by Xtravar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Privacy is a product of your life, as is your work and other byproducts. In a free market, the products of your life belong to you. This is inherently fair and makes sense.

      I trade work hours for money from my employer.
      I trade my money for items I want to buy.
      I trade certain measures of privacy for social benefits.
      I also trade certain measures of privacy for compensation from businesses.
      If any of these transactions do not turn out to our mutual benefit, the dissatisfied party is free to discontinue the trade at anytime.

      Essentially the government is trying to 'tax' our privacy for 'the greater good', just like they tax our economic transactions... for the 'greater good'.

      Political ideologues on both sides of the spectrum don't quite understand this concept - they arbitrarily pick what's right and wrong when it benefits them.

      But the smart monkey will realize that the reason people get so upset about these things is that it is inherently unfair to take another's personal products without their consent. Do you own you and your byproducts, or does the "greater good" own you? And how can you trust that the "greater good" is so great and good?

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    10. Re:To answer the Headline: by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      That being said, I'm not interested. If I want people to know where I am going to be I'll tell them if they need to know, not post it or have some 'micro blog' tracking my every move. I don't need to blog it or broadcast it. Maybe I am showing my age but I am really finding all of this stuff to be getting increasingly silly.

      Agreed. And if anyone is seriously interested in tracking some random person's whereabouts and goings-on all day long....well, actually, isn't that why we have stalking laws?

      What I mean is, people will be intentionally allowing other people to stalk them by means of this geospatialmicrobloggerificbullshit.

      Maybe I'm just getting old, but damn, some people just need to get a life!

    11. Re:To answer the Headline: by jahudabudy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, what the hell happened at 10:15 AM!!??? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    12. Re:To answer the Headline: by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      Oh.. I'm so busted

      10:15AM - Still at work.

    13. Re:To answer the Headline: by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I'd say there's an important difference in there. If person A wants to take a part of their personal life and make it public, that's up to them. The problem is when person A wants to keep something private and entity B decides that person A doesn't have a say in the matter.

      Well, it just depends on how easy it is to get info out of various sources and what not. Just the other day I was looking at those DVR 4 camera security cameras out at sams club. They are around 1000-1500 and you can hook them up to the internet and it says that it records a few weeks worth of video.

      That's the current state of that tech. There is tech to record license plate numbers and try to id a person from these sorts of sources. Now when google offers a beta web app doing that which would integrate into on of those home DVR security setups. It don't matter if it's the government, grandmom, or me, all it would take is a google search that also searches all those homes that you just might have passed by and presto total recording and search. Just wait for those $1.5k systems to drop down to $.15k and the search software to become available. Imagine how many houses, businesses that you pass in front of daily. This doesn't require the government at all to do.

      I'm just waiting until some one figures out that we should give cellphones to the 3rd world to track and spy on 'em. Of course the same could be said for us except that we pay to be spied upon...

    14. Re:To answer the Headline: by hedwards · · Score: 1

      About $10m if it's the right person.

    15. Re:To answer the Headline: by edmicman · · Score: 1

      You're right - I hate all those online publications and sites that force me to visit them. Damn kids!

    16. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Key word is that these posts will then become property of some social networking site that will later get bought up by some multi-national corporation so that the people that we clamoring for our privacy rights can send a court order to seize all their data and wham, you just did the government's work for them. Its happening with wiretaps, its going to be happening with blogs.

    17. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did you shower? We need to know.

    18. Re:To answer the Headline: by xadoc · · Score: 1

      Dexter's microblogging 1:00PM - in the john 2:00PM - no more john 3:00PM - john into pieces 4:00PM - john sleeps with the fishes

    19. Re:To answer the Headline: by moxley · · Score: 1

      Who modded parent off-topic?

      Because it isn't really.

      I will say, in response to the parent post, that I see the irony you're referring to- but in general I don't think it undermines the fight - I think mabe you are thinking that once people get more used to this sort of thing then they won't care so much about privacy, and I see your point - but my thinking is that privacy is about choice.

      Meaning, you should be able to share your information when you want to - and not have others (particularly the government and corporations) deciding to use your personal information in ways you wouldn't approve of or give a green light to, or sharing it witout your permission.

      And you certainly shouldn't have either of these groups secretly digging up info on you to use against you.

    20. Re:To answer the Headline: by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My wife is a substitute teacher, and got a Facebook profile and added her nieces and nephews as friends. And now she knows to within a few days the exact time that one of them lost her virginity. How on EARTH she expected to keep that information from her family, while simultaneously allowing access to everyone who wanted to be her "friend" is beyond me, but I do know that she wanted it kept secret - her profile page was sanitized shortly after my wife joined.

      And this includes two reasons why Facebook could soon be jumping the shark if it hasn't already.

      Firstly, the inherent problem with social networking sites of managing your different groups of friends and keeping them separate (assuming you know how to do so) gets to be more hassle than it's worth as (a) your groups of friends and (b) the amount of people using social networking in general grow. (This wasn't my idea, but the person who came up with it pinpointed the "more hassle than it's worth" saturation point as the reason for CB radio's downfall).

      Secondly, the "everyone's using it including your [from a kids/teenage point of view] parents' generation" factor is going to rob it of most of its coolness. Not that this guarantees its downfall; it does depend on how large a factor coolness vs. social usefulness plays however (and how willing people are to switch).

      Remember 13375p34k? Used to be everywhere on the net? I realised recently that I'd barely seen any of it in the past couple of years- not since around the time that newspapers started printing guides explaining those strange words your children type.

      Coincidence? Hmm...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    21. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I am showing my age but I am really finding all of this stuff to be getting increasingly silly.


      You're showing your age, but remember back. Teens are more likely to say "look at me". Also, teens are easier to bilk, so they're a key market demographic for most products.

    22. Re:To answer the Headline: by epp_b · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you shower? We need to know.

      You're new here, aren't you?

    23. Re:To answer the Headline: by Cyvros · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if the problem is people needing to get a life - it may be that they have lives that they want to broadcast. See, back in the old days, we didn't have lives and we lived in basements - nothing new there - but these days, everyone has lives and less people are still in their basements - hence the perceived need to tell people what they're doing from wherever the hell they happen to be at that particular time.

    24. Re:To answer the Headline: by arstchnca · · Score: 1

      But seriously, I appreciate the majority of /.'ers who seem to champion privacy rights and issues, but whats the point of fighting for these rights if we are just going to turn around and voluntary post descriptions of our activities, locations of these activities, and photographic evidence with it? Sort of flys in the face of that mentality [...]



      Only if you're a retard who cannot think critically.

      Basic reasoning abilities alone ought to be enough to understand that the voluntary posts that you describe are just that - voluntary. If and when anything happens that I would like kept secret - be it having bought a losing lottery ticket or vehicular manslaughter - there are no privacy implications. No drive would even begin to arise to motivate me to go through the myriad of tasks (locating internet access & computer, logging in, composing message) to publish said goings on in the same fashion as motivates one to blog about all those "Cool" things they did last weekend.

      Quite the opposite, really, and I don't know how one could be so mistaken as to believe blogging and similar activities [fly] in the face of that mentality.

      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    25. Re:To answer the Headline: by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      Remember 13375p34k? Used to be everywhere on the net? I realised recently that I'd barely seen any of it in the past couple of years- not since around the time that newspapers started printing guides explaining those strange words your children type.

      No, its because everyone realized how lame it is.

      Plus, teenager can endure only so much of "learn to write properly, idiot" replies when he comes to semi serious forums and spawns half page of unreadable garbage. Realization that all the really cool people look down to you for leetspeaking ... priceless.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    26. Re:To answer the Headline: by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      I find your schedule intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    27. Re:To answer the Headline: by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Remember 13375p34k? Used to be everywhere on the net? I realised recently that I'd barely seen any of it in the past couple of years- not since around the time that newspapers started printing guides explaining those strange words your children type.

      leetspeak was a way of getting around IRC and board filters about banned topics. By the time newspapers started printing guides, sysadmins were aware of the problem and had either upgraded filters to compensate or just dropped them. Also, non-filtering systems were by and large transferred to for sensitive conversations.

    28. Re:To answer the Headline: by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Isn't the lack of privacy a byproduct of your life, similar to the electromagnetic radiation spewing forth from your television?

      I borrow a book from the library. That's the action. The library must keep a record of that transaction, to make sure that they get the book back. That byproduct is a little bit of information about me radiating away.

      I don't own this byproduct any more than I own the exhaust that spews forth from my car. We can all make some agreements to help mitigate misusage, but in the grand scheme of things information for better or worse does have a habit of escaping into the atmosphere.

    29. Re:To answer the Headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and noone's even mentioned the most popular geomicroblogging site.... brightkite.com

    30. Re:To answer the Headline: by sitarah · · Score: 1

      "No one in their right mind would give a flying shit what I waste all of my time on. "

      Except they do. People can keep making these statements like 'No one cares, (|micro|geo|)blogging is stupid' when it is obvious other people read blogs and therefore DO care. People do. Your friends do. It's not even about advertisers.

      You are a certain type of person. I can see what kind of person you are by what you choose to post OR not post. You are saying something right now just by posting that list: you drink coffee, and you think this microblogging trend is stupid.

      I know something about you. You expressed yourself and revealed something. You purposely didn't express a lot. That also says something.

      When you see me on the street, you see my physical appearance. My clothing says something about me -- something I, mostly, control. My hair, too, is a statement that I purposely construct to reveal something about myself. I am telling the world I am a certain type of person: trendy, soccer mom, professional, casual, sporty, etc.

      But it's vague. It's up for interpretation. Is my hair 33 inches long because I am lazy or because I like the elvish look?

      When I add a badge to MySpace that I took a quiz and it says my fantasy creature is an elf, now you have a clue. My favorite movie listed on Facebook is LOTR? More clues. Suddenly you know more about me in a way that I control. I choose what specifics you get. Clothing, hair, it's all up for interpretation, necessity, and sometimes there are things there I don't want you to see, or things that *mis*represent me.

      Blogging, social media, twittering -- it's all a way to add to that persona I create. Yes, I don't think you, specifically, care that I am eating a bagel on 59th street. However, of my 7 friends, maybe someone does, because they found a great bagel place and now wonder if I might like it. I twitter I saw a movie -- 6 of my friends don't want to know but 1 wanted to see that movie. Those 6 friends ignore the 140 char message, the 1 friend benefits, and I benefit from ensuing conversation. Adding in geo data now lets me say 'Hey, I go traveling every weekend to take pictures'. You now know I spend a lot of free time taking pictures, and you know me better. I didn't have to tell you, in case you didn't care.

      People want to be known. Microblogging, geoblogging, social media, all of it helps that. You chose to say 'work and coffee'. You didn't really want to be known in that post except as someone who feels 'This is silly'. You controlled your persona. Other people choose to control their persona in other ways. They're just expressing themselves. They want to show how unique they are. They want to make sure people see them they want they want to be seen. That is what it is all about.

    31. Re:To answer the Headline: by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      If I could mod in here, I would have (insightful). Thank you for the perspective. :) I guess its kind of an unconscious voyeurism? :)

  3. Seriously by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Funny

    If anyone ever uses the word 'Geomicroblogging' with me in conversation I might just break several of their bones. When will the madness stop?

    1. Re:Seriously by saider · · Score: 3, Funny

      Buzzwords are one method geeks use separate venture capitalists from their money. I think this is a "good thing".

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:Seriously by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      When will the madness stop?

      with geomacroblogging? or something at least equally disturbing.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    3. Re:Seriously by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Mash up". It should have stopped before the words were ever uttered. I would like to know who it was that uttered them. Just an address, that is all I need.

       

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:Seriously by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ooh, I bet you could get their address by mashing up their MySpace, with a whois query on their IP address, and then tie it into Google Maps! Then cross check that with Twitter, and bam! You've got an interactive slide show of their every move.

      (If you're a VC, please make the check out to 'Creative Applications Serving Humanity'...CASH for short.)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always repurpose them: "Mash up" what gets left in the bushes after drinking way too much corn mash....

    6. Re:Seriously by IronChef · · Score: 1

      When "spleencasting" becomes the rage. There's always something new.

    7. Re:Seriously by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Do you have a patent? No patent, no money. You've _got_ to have "IP".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:Seriously by Drakonik · · Score: 1

      geomacroblogging


      10:00 AM: John Doe is in: (United States)
      11:00 AM: John Doe is in: (United States)
      12:00 PM: John Doe is in: (United States)

      Seems 'macro' enough for me.

    9. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, it was probably a restaurant owner offering potatoes.

    10. Re:Seriously by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Be sure to tell us all about it on your geotibialfracturemicroblog.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    11. Re:Seriously by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Ah, you mean Proactiveendoskeletalparadigmshifting.

  4. Oh, FFS! by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody gives a rats ass about where you are when you tell the world what you are doing...Unless it's hilariously unintentional.

    "JUST BANGED A HAWT GURL BEHIND THE CLUB!!!!!"
    Location: Mom's basement

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Oh, FFS! by Akvum · · Score: 1

      "JUST BANGED A HAWT GURL BEHIND THE CLUB!!!!!" Location: Mom's basement

      So, we've finally found B1FF. The only sane solution is to nuke it from orbit.

  5. I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john by Gat0r30y · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    1. Re:I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john by BillBrasky · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Twitter Shitter to me.

      ROFL. That's exactly what I was thinking of. Not only could you tell everyone that you're shitting but WHERE!

  6. Where you were??? by CowboyNealOption · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'll always know where I was when I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john. Hopefully in the john. Man twitter is so incredibly useful.

    1. Re:Where you were??? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      Mantwitter? Sounds like the name of an X-rated flick.

  7. Clarification needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it has 'Micro' and 'Blog' in the name, and I'll always know where I was when I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john.

    So... when you say John, do you mean "toilet", or "the client of a prostitute"?

    1. Re:Clarification needed by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      No, he mean's John, the slashdot summer of code intern.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  8. I suspect this is a good time for this by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 2, Funny

    English, motherfucker. Do you speak it?

    1. Re:I suspect this is a good time for this by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 1

      "'What' ain't no planet I ever heard of! Do they speak English in 'What'?

      Great movie.

  9. The Nokia N95, E61 etc by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Already have GPSs on board, already have mapping on board, already have photo and video, already have a "lifeblog" on board to sync the phone info up with your favourite blog.

    What I'm saying is, it's been done already, you guys are so 2005.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The Nokia N95, E61 etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The E61 does not have GPS built-in.

    2. Re:The Nokia N95, E61 etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maddox? You have to realize that time passes between when a technology gets invented and when it gains market acceptance. Think of the internet:

      ARPANET (1969).
      First TCP/IP WAN (1983).
      First commercial link (1989).
      WWW project released (1991).
      Public interest begins to grow (1994)
      The word Internet becomes commonplace (1996)
      Internet usage explodes (1996-1997 and later)

      So one could argue that anyone trying to promote the internet in the mid-90's would encounter you saying: "What I'm saying is, it's been done already, you guys are so 1969."

      I'm not judging the validity of how popular this will become (or not), just that your comment is useless.

  10. dont wait for android -- Loopt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seriously -- there's nothing unique to or new in the iPhone 2.0 or Google's Android platform that you need to enable geo-based twittering, photo-ing, etc.

    Loopt's been out a while and just enabled a bunch more users now that Verizon Wireless blessed it for many of their phones.

  11. Next greatest blogging product! by jhfry · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have the next new big product in blogging... its called "aLife". aLife is currently not available where you are sitting now, but for the low price of $1,000 you can order yours today! aLife includes adventure, romance, excitement, and best of all it includes a lifetime guarantee! If you want a blog that everyone on the internet will read, simply get aLife and you might just find that you acutally have something interesting to write about!

    I understand blogging, I don't do it because I think I'd rather live my life than write about it, but I get it.

    I just don't understand why so many people are so excited about being able to blog in so many different ways... if it doesn't improve the quality or the value of the content what good does it do?

    I don't know the figures, but I know that at least 99% of all blog traffic is to less than 5% of the blogs on the internet, and I know why that is... CONTENT! Give these bloggers a tool to create better content!

    --
    Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    1. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      simply get aLife

      But will I have to leave my mom's basement?

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    2. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Give these bloggers a tool to create better content!

      You mean they need a brain that functions AND aLife? Awfully high bar to reach judging from most of the blog content out there.

    3. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I understand blogging, I don't do it because I think I'd rather live my life than write about it, but I get it."

      That's laughable. A few 'bloggers':
      Einstein
      Darwin
      Freud
      Madam Curi
      I am glad they blogged. Granted it was paper and pen, but the point is the same.

      Clearly, you are more important then those listed~

      Yes, most of it is crap but so what? no one forces you to rad it.

      "I don't know the figures, but I know that at least 99% of all blog traffic is to less than 5% of the blogs on the internet, and I know why that is..."

      I don't know the numbers, but here are some I made up to support my pointless rant.

      There are no tools for better content, only the bloggers desire to strive for new content.

      I wont say better, because that is very subjective.

      I don't care what your relative is up to, but I do care about mine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by ruin20 · · Score: 1

      You understand why people do it but don't do it yourself because you'd rather live your life then write about it? well, when you make it easier to write about it, you make the decision to "live it" or "write about it" smaller because you make one take less from the other.

      --
      Oh honey look... How cute... an angry slashdotter!
    5. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by jhfry · · Score: 1

      I woudn't normally reply, but I'm bored so here it goes.

      First of all, I wouldn't call Einstein and the like bloggers... they were researchers and scientists and did what all researchers and scientists do, they document what they do and what happens. Second, they had VERY interesting things to write about and are thus the exact opposite of the subject of my comments. Finally, I said I get it, I understand the appeal though I don't engage in the activity myself as I feel my time is better spent with other activities.

      I know that I am not more important than those listed... in fact I am content with the fact that only 1 person in a hundred million or so is even close. Do I hope that I can have the influence on history that they did, YES! Would I write about it if I did, YES! But again, I would then have something telling the world about!

      As far as the numbers I quoted, yes I pulled them out of my ass to some degree... I know for a fact that my numbers are pretty damn conservative thats why I qualified them with "at least" and "less than". I suppose if I was writing a thesis on the subject rather than a comment on slashdot I would do the research and get a much more accurate estimate but my numbers served to illustrate my point and I challenge you to dispute them if you are so inclined.

      As far as no one forcing me to rad(read?) the crap that people post... unfortunately too much of it is indexed by google and the like, and somehow made it high on the search engine's rankings... I don't know how many worthless blog posts I have read when searching for the information I needed. I have found good information in peoples blogs too, especially technical info, but I find that these are the blogs of the experts in their fields and thus they have value to the public as a whole and therefore are outside the focus of my previous comment.

      Anyway have fun with your blogging, I hope you don't miss out on something worth writing about because your busy blogging!

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    6. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by jhfry · · Score: 1

      I would agree except that I think that the constant need to blog, and the constant availability of tools to do so, only makes blogging more of a distraction. Blog at the end of the day, like you would with a diary or journal.

      We have all seen people texting during a movie, play, sporting event, etc... just imagine what it will be like when people feel the need to write about the event while it happens! Hell I sat behind a woman who missed her daughter's entire dance routine at a recital recently because she was so concerned with photo-messaging a picture of her daughter in costume to the person sitting next to her that she didn't realize until the end that her daughter was on stage!

      Technology and communication are vital to our society and they can add value or distract from it... we don't need more distractions, we need more value!

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    7. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I have the next new big product in blogging... its called "aLife". aLife is currently not available where you are sitting now, but for the low price of $1,000 you can order yours today! aLife includes adventure, romance, excitement, and best of all it includes a lifetime guarantee! If you want a blog that everyone on the internet will read, simply get aLife and you might just find that you acutally have something interesting to write about!

      Maybe they should just get the Sims and go with "simLife" instead, it's cheaper and more interesting things happen. Got about as much relevance to me as your real life anyway...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by coolshorty · · Score: 1

      BEWARE, it's a pyramid scheme!

    9. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by Cyvros · · Score: 1

      We have all seen people texting during a movie, play, sporting event, etc... just imagine what it will be like when people feel the need to write about the event while it happens!

      You don't have to imagine it - it's already happening. If you ever take a look at the Twitter public timeline (or even just specific Twitter accounts like Robert Scoble's or Chris Pirillo's) during an event like SXSW or WWDC, you'll see a lot of people are doing it already.

    10. Re:Next greatest blogging product! by Tano · · Score: 1

      Einstein, Darwin, Freud, and Madame Curie (who's "Curi" ?) bloggers ?

      Christ mate, how did you manage to get to this comparison ?

      It's like bloody saying that being good at a F1 racing game puts makes you similar to Michael Schumacher - i mean, granted, you just press a few keyboard buttons for fun, and Schumacher has to drive a really nasty contraption, making split-second decisions just to stay alive - but it's the same thing in the end, right ?

      I have nothing against blogging, i follow quite a few interesting blogs myself, but common man, be a little realistic...

  12. Micro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wait for geoNANOblogging to come around.

    1. Re:Micro? by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

      "by Anonymous Coward"

      In case you're unsure why no one cares about your post.

  13. Failed bloggers Twitter by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

    Failed bloggers Twitter for an audience; failed Twitterers will try geomicroblogging or whatever its going to be called.

    --
    Harold
    1. Re:Failed bloggers Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, this is true, for me at least. I failed at blogging, so now I Twitter.

      P.S. Follow me. :D twitter.com/nickdumas

      Woohoo linkwhore!

    2. Re:Failed bloggers Twitter by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

      Hey, me too! P.S. Follow me: twitter.com/harold

      --
      Harold
  14. We have lots of words for the same things by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A good example is the word 'stupid'
    Just off the top of my head I can think of quite a few synonyms

    Idiot
    Moron
    Nitwit
    Simpleton
    Asinine
    Fool
    Jackass
    Rum-dumb
    Dense
    Oaf
    Thick
    Unintelligent
    Witless
    Geomicroblogging

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
    1. Re:We have lots of words for the same things by Dracos · · Score: 1

      Since you just mixed nouns and adjectives, which one are you?

      /me takes off grammar nazi hat

    2. Re:We have lots of words for the same things by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Way to demonstrate your ignorance of the difference between nouns and adjectives.

    3. Re:We have lots of words for the same things by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes I know the perils of writing anything on the internet these days. Just take some consolation that I didn't use 'pwn' or 'lol' in my post.

      --
      I have nothing compelling to say
    4. Re:We have lots of words for the same things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... so you were trying to make an acronym to cleverly spell... let's see... "IMNSAFJRDOTUWG"? Is there any other reason you dumped a truckload of single words into a vertical list like that?

    5. Re:We have lots of words for the same things by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

      Thank YOU for noticing. It wouldn't be the internet without people like yourself

      --
      I have nothing compelling to say
    6. Re:We have lots of words for the same things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, good sir. There are two words there I had not seen in such a context before. I shall certainly use them in the future. *tips hat*

  15. Build it in to glasses by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously. I want to look at an object and get information on it (hovering above the object in the font of my choice). I want to digg up or down and see comments to things like carnival rides, tourist attractions, and those nice ladies in the windows in Amsterdam.

    I want to leave a comment on EVERYTHING and I want to see the comments others leave. GPS + glasses with HUD will change the world.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:Build it in to glasses by DeadManCoding · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you don't wear glasses? I have great vision, and there's a good chance that I'll mess up said vision by wearing glasses that allow me to comment on EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm also not going to wear sunglasses at night, I'm just not that cool.

      --
      "The only constant in the universe is change." - Unknown author
    2. Re:Build it in to glasses by idlemind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes! I was thinking about this the other day. My idea was that people could tag stuff in real life with messages. They could be private or public messages. Then you bring up the camera/display interface and it shows you what messages are attached to whatever object you are pointing it at. Your glasses + HUD idea would be awesome.

    3. Re:Build it in to glasses by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Are you freaking INSANE. You'll look at a sandwich and see ten lists of the top five sandwiches, followed by someone wishing for a petrified Beowulf cluster of sandwiches with hot grits followed by an auto loading image of a naked Maggie Thatcher.

      But even if the system worked without that, it boils down to one thing. I could care less what the hell you think about my sandwich!

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    4. Re:Build it in to glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Build it in to glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate you people, and everything you say. You are a bunch of morons. Why, oh why, would I want to have the rest my world polluted by your total drivel. It's bad enough that I have to drag myself through tons of this shit online in a professional capacity.

      You gits have tried to ruin google earth, and now you're trying to ruin the real one too. Fuck off and die along with your geomicroblogging bullshit.

    6. Re:Build it in to glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shadowrun, anyone?

      (.... And no, I do not mean the Xbox shooter. I mean the actual RPG that the shooter only vaguely resembles.)

    7. Re:Build it in to glasses by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Your glasses + HUD idea would be awesome.

      So would the "marketing opportunities".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:Build it in to glasses by _V_P_ · · Score: 1

      Virtual Light much?

      --
      asdf.
    9. Re:Build it in to glasses by Drakonik · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd give you + Insightful or Interesting or something. I agree with you, more or less. The future of the internet and of technology is togetherness. Look at cloud computing. Despite some objections, more and more data is being put 'out there'.

      Personally, I'd love to be able to drive down the street, look at a building (with the glasses-HUD) or just punch in coordinates, and get reviews and comments on its quality, style, and anything else I'd want to know.

      I'm using Twitter more often now, and it's interesting that I can put information out in a compact form that anyone could parse. Yeah, there are twitter-shitters, but I've mostly seen interesting updates. So block the twitter-shitters, and subscribe to the people who say things that interest you. All this "I don't get twitter" talk is exactly what "the older generation" said about rock and roll and computers and the internet.

  16. It's all about ego by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    The type of people that invent/mashup these names on their blogs etc have a dream of one day standing in front of a crowd of people while being introduced as "the father/inventor/visionary of microcyberblugblurging".

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:It's all about ego by Otter · · Score: 1
      The type of people that invent/mashup these names on their blogs...

      Hey, someone succeeded in getting you to use the at-least-as-awful "mashup"!

    2. Re:It's all about ego by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      If someone used this word in public I'd assume they were having a fit.

      Bloggers are just taking a page from lazy journalists who stick "gate" at the end of every controversy.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  17. Enough of this useless garbage already! by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Call me when I can get GeoMicroBrewing, then I'll be interested. (That would be the ability to get a high quality microbrew from a PDA, wherever I am. I suspect I have a long wait.)

  18. Aw, FFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am REALLY getting old, 'cause anytime I see a new buzzword or "catchy" website name my soul dies just a little bit.

    Quick, somebody register these, I'm in a Web 2.0 website name generatin' mood:

    whenugo.com
    whereru.com
    urwher.com
    quahog.net (completely irrelevant, but so what it's Web 2.0 baby)
    blogUrlog.com
    tibxty.com (made that one by banging my face into the keyboard)

  19. More like guBlogging by Dracos · · Score: 1

    The k1ddi3z are lazy, abbreviate everything, and don't know what a Greek mu is, much less how to type one.

    And it'll be pronounced "gooblogging"... not the most appealing tech term.

    1. Re:More like guBlogging by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      That's close, but kiddies are going to go further because anything they can say in fewer letters will become so. They'll start calling it gubing and blogging in turn will become just 'bing'. "I'm bing, atm." or "Let me bing that." and "That's totally going on my gub."

  20. geomicro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OpenMoko/Freerunner is being released this week with GPS as standard, and somehow you've managed to write the story about:

    (1) a proprietary device with a history of being extremely hostile to developers

    (2) a proprietary framework that doesn't even exist yet and is being developed in total secrecy

    wtf?

  21. I can't wait to blog from the summit of Everest! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, why enjoy the peacefulness of nature or the majestic view when I could be tapping away on a fucking keyboard?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  22. Other applications... by GWLlosa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are other people who care nothing about this 'twitter-micro-geo-blogging' phenomenon who are looking forward to this technology. For starters, you install some crap on your kid's phone, and it lets you live-track where he is, and emails you every time that little SOB hits 90 in YOUR car...

  23. And the other obligatory.... by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Sin Fest variation of this.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  24. I think we're headed for another dark ages by blhack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anybody ever considered that possibility that we will reach an over-saturation of information?

    Sometimes its good NOT to know if a restaurant is good or not without visiting. People ARE individuals. We need to ability to make our own decisions about things.

    Think about even the difference between my generation (i'm 21) and my parents. My parents had to go out and experience things first hand to get any sort of idea about them. I carry around a nokia 770 with wikipedia on it, and a net connection to wikihow. I can get on google local and read the comments to determine wether I want to go to a club or not. If something doesn't exist to me on google maps, it doesn't exist.

    I know, i'm the guilty party here, but this wasn't a conscious decision. I did not come to the realization at some young[er] age that I could either embrace a technologically rich existence, or not.

    Imagine what my children will experience, or their children, or their children all the way down. I rapidly see people losing their ability to think independently of their peers. Even the people who consider themselves intellectuals are virtually inable to come up with an original thought.
    I completely blame this trend on the availability of information. Believe it or not, there IS such a thing as knowledge being TOO easy to get.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:I think we're headed for another dark ages by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, your parents actually talked to real people, their friends, neighbors, relatives, etc. Word of mouth was literally word of mouth then, and guess what? They didn't always *have* to visit an eatery to see if it was good or not. They could often find that out from someone they knew and trusted rather than some anonymous author of a review on a website.

      It is entirely your fault and it *was* a conscious decision. Don't bemoan your choices; either embrace them or change them.

    2. Re:I think we're headed for another dark ages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would finish reading your comment, but its length has caused me an over-saturation of information.

  25. Whatever losers by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I geonanoblog, which is easily a thousand times cooler.

    1. Re:Whatever losers by antibryce · · Score: 1

      I geoviblog.

      Let the religious war begin.

    2. Re:Whatever losers by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Well I guess I'll see you in the geonanoblogosphere then!

  26. When world collide by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Internet used to had that "another world" feeling, with few points of touch with the real, geographical one. Now you can blog, right here, right now, crossing the street, when no car is coming my w

  27. "and I'll always know where I was ..." by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

    ...and I'll always know where I was when I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john.

    Let me guess... you were in the john.

    1. Re:"and I'll always know where I was ..." by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Yeah you wish that's where he was.

  28. Shill by s.d. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if the anonymous submitter works for Fire Eagle or byNotes, since there's no content to this story but saying how these sites are going to change the world.

  29. It's not that simple by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What happens when a large number of people who are either directly or indirectly associated with you begin volunteering information that they don't know/think encroaches on your privacy, and may not actually encroach on your privacy, but when aggregated, gives a clear picture of activities that you'd like to avoid making public?

    1. Re:It's not that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You find out you shouldn't have trusted them with that information in the first place.

  30. FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. Problem is not privacy by markov_chain · · Score: 1

    Privacy has long not been a problem to the members of the Internet generation, who seem to thrive on making their lives public; besides, the idea of having impromptu message boards tied to location is actually pretty cool.

    However, it seems it would be really hard to prevent spoofing. Unless all possible GPS chips are locked down by DRM, or the geoblogs locked to known non-hacked phone models---which is as likely to happen as hell freezing over---there will be all sorts of issues that already popped up elsewhere, like spam, trolls, griefers, etc.

    Maybe the real value of the companies that come into this field will be solving these issues in some reasonable way, like Slashdot did with comment moderation.
     

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  32. Jaiku? by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    Isn't this more or less Jaiku? Except Jaiku has been in closed beta since forever, and has been more or less untouched since Google bought it.

    --
    What?
  33. So how many people... by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

    clicked the FireEagle link and IMMEDIATELY closed the tab upon reading "FireEagle is the secure and stylish way-"? (I literally got no further than that)
    At least I gotta give 'em credit for being upfront and letting me know within a half dozen words that it's a bunch of crap.

    --
    Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  34. Cringeworthy by copponex · · Score: 1

    Yes. Please, give all of the little yuppie children with no jobs the opportunity to tag physical objects. What could possibly be more horrifying than MySpace? Importing it into the real world.

    Of course, I could then color code the map to search for OMG PONIES strings, and have a better chance avoiding encounters with the unfortunate benefactors of the death of Darwinism. Maybe it's not such a bad idea after all.

    One thing that I know for sure: Abercrombie and Fitch? Ground zero for Apocalypse Dumb.

    1. Re:Cringeworthy by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, old dude. With this new technology you can tag your grass with "YOU DAMN KIDS KEEP OFF MY LAWN!!"

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  35. It's amazing how people miss the big picture. by NeoBlazeSJX · · Score: 1

    As difficult as it may be, just ignore the "microgeoblogging" buzzword and look at the big picture here:

    Despite the antisocial tendencies of the majority of the Slashdot crowd, a good deal of people actually give a shit about others and what they are up to.

    A personal example:

    I don't get to see many of the people I used to hang around with in high school. It's a bit much to call or e-mail everyone each week. By the same token, a full scale blog is a bit much to maintain especially if your life is mundane in general.

    Now consider the micro concept: Most Information only requires the basic W's. Who when where what.

    [Jerry tomorrow downtown coffee.]

    Now if I happen to be near downtown tomorrow I might be inclined to call him and try to meet him for coffee. Otherwise, I'll have something to talk to later. But calling him each day to say "are you having coffee" is a bit much, especially with so many other people for both myself and Jerry to interact with.

    The micro concept allows us to make better use of the small windows of time me have, and automating the mundane aspects of "who", "when", and "where, allow more focus of the substantial aspects of "what" and 'how".

    It's engineered serendipity, which is much more important as free time becomes more sparse and our friends become more spread out over the globe.

    Shorter and immediate is better. Just look at the progression of remote communication:

    mail->phone->email->text->sms->twitter.
    Shorter, quicker, more people!

    It deals with the trivialities and allows for more substance when we actually sit down to talk or communicate in person.

    I understand how easy it is to just throw off the next buzzword you hear, but look beneath the hype and look at the actual revolutionary possibility.

    Rather than a replacement to human interaction (which I'm rather fond of) it could augment it allowing us to have more meaningful face time with others.

  36. In The John... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    >I'll always know where I was when I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john.

    I, for one, don't give a shit.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  37. 1984? by e03179 · · Score: 1
    From the post:

    "The iPhone 3G and Android devices are coming this year...


    Stuff Apple and Google hype into new posts much? Maybe the post would have more fairly started out by saying something like "With smartphones becoming more and more popular among cell phone users, the door is open for...".

    The "door" has been open for a while. Phones with GPS have been around for years. Automobiles and boats have had GPS for longer. Auto-sensing positioning devices aren't here thanks to Apple or Google unreleased Android OS. So why the iPhone and Android hype? Yep, those companies are helping to make the technology more mainstream, but there's other companies doing the same out there.

    Sure the iPhone will be popular, but come on. Nokia sells more phones in a week than the total number of iPhones sold to date. Yeah, not all Nokia phones are smart, but my point is to say that the iPhone isn't the end-all. There's other stuff out there. Blackberries, Palm OS, Simbian, and WinMo. And a good chunk of them have had GPS and 3G speeds quite a while longer than the iPhone 3G that's coming out next week.

    end rant

    So, what's going to happen when positioning devices are a bigger part of our everyday lives? The devices will be able to show us where we've traveled and how fast we traveled (either via the devices we carry on us or the devices attached to our transportation). Heck, I guess those devices will be able to show if we have cut someone off on the parkway or if we are a high risk driver in general or if we frequent night clubs, high end clothing stores, or strip clubs. I wonder if the (life and auto) insurance companies will ever tap into these networks.

    --
    -516
  38. Let me get this straight... by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So we've put all this effort into all this technology to make the world a "smaller" place; to make every bit of information reachable and searchable from everywhere; to make location, distance, space itself, as irrelevant as possible; and somehow the idea of going back and tying information to a physical location is suppose to be... good?

    Maybe I'm just misunderstanding the point?

    --
    Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Sobieski · · Score: 1

      Kinda like putting analog clocks in a computers GUI i guess.

      --
      Particles, stuff that matters.
    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by NeoBlazeSJX · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point.

      While information itself should exist in a 'spaceless' form, people themselves still exist in a space filled reality. When it comes to information about people, where things happen is very relevant.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      and somehow the idea of going back and tying information to a physical location is suppose to be... good?

      It may seem surprising, but real things exist in real space. That restaurant you're about to get a bad meal at isn't just a domain name. Think of it as metadata if that makes you feel any more comfortable with reality.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  39. Privacy is a social agreement by spun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Privacy is NOT the product of your life. It is not a natural right, like you being entitled to the fruits of your labor is. Privacy is something that you may have on your property, if it can be physically arranged.

    But privacy is making demands on other people, "Don't look at me!" What gives you the right to determine what I can and can't experience? I mean, the light and sound waves coming off your body aren't yours. If those light and sound waves happen to enter my eyes and ears, they are MINE.

    Now, if you and I have an agreement, "you don't look at me and I won't look at you" then that is fair, and that is what we generally have in society. But it is because we agreed to that, not from some inherent right of ownership of all sensory phenomenon.

    This is what I hate about libertarians. All they have is the hammer of property, so every problem boils down to ownership. It is ridiculous.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Privacy is a social agreement by Drakonik · · Score: 1

      I mean, the light and sound waves coming off your body aren't yours. If those light and sound waves happen to enter my eyes and ears, they are MINE.

      Awesome. Now I don't feel bad about staring at my neighbor while she's in the shower, or peeping at that guy's ATM PIN while I wait my turn.

    2. Re:Privacy is a social agreement by S3D · · Score: 1

      Privacy is NOT the product of your life. It is not a natural right, like you being entitled to the fruits of your labor is.


      Neither entitlement to the fruits of your labor is the natural right. Neither is your freedom or right to live. In fact if understand "natural rights" in the classical sense as "universal right inherent in the nature of living beings" there is only one natural right - right of the strong to do as he want with weak. That is why there is no much sense in the concept of "natural right"

    3. Re:Privacy is a social agreement by spun · · Score: 1

      Wrong. As I said, we have a social agreement. You agree not to attempt to look at my PIN or passwords, I do the same for you. It isn't a natural right. In any case, the responsibility for not letting those photons from the ATM machine into my eyes is YOURS. I'm going to turn away, because I'm polite, but lots of people aren't, so hide it.

      As for your neighbor, I assume she is on her property with the blinds open. If she wants to give you a show, there's nothing wrong with watching. She can close the damn blinds if she doesn't want you to see.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:Privacy is a social agreement by spun · · Score: 1

      Hehe. I agree completely. Even posted the same idea here before. I mean, we're just stating the basis of all of modern western liberal philosophy here, as set out by Hobbes, Locke, and Paine. Bellum omnium contra omnes, or the war of all against all. Lots of people (especially libertarians!) use the natural rights argument, and some times it helps to talk in their language.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  40. Twitxr.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So TFA talks about what Twitxr http://www.twitxr.com is doing already...

  41. It is not intended to catch on by ghjm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nobody would call anything 'geomicroblogging' if they planned for it to be routinely used by millions of people. Can you imagine? "Hi, did you see my geomicroblog the other day? I posted some stuff about geomicroblogging. I'm sorry, the reception isn't very good on this cell phone - the address of restaurant we're going to is on my geomicroblog. No, I said geomicroblog. GEO MICRO BLOG! Oh never mind, it's Andy's Bar And Grill, which is the same number of syllables anyway."

    If by some random chance this actually caught on, the word would immediately be shortened (see: "blog" from "web log" from "personal content management system").

    I propose "gumble."

    -Graham

  42. Dear Sir, by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No one in their right mind would give a flying shit what I waste all of my time on.

    I see you are a coffee-drinker. Please accept this coupon for 50 cents off your next coffee, good at the Harbucks at the corner of nth and xth street, which you walk by every day at 7:52am.

    Seriously, did you know MySpace uses the crap people put on their profiles, to select the ads to show to those people? Every bit of seemingly-useless crap you spew, can be used somehow.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Dear Sir, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, did you know MySpace uses the crap people put on their profiles, to select the ads to show to those people?

      I'd be more shocked if they didn't.

  43. Be Serious ! by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    What are you doing, where are you now to assene so harsh a criticism to a brand new idea that didn't yet have time to prove itself ?

    Mingling technologies to make the sum of them something more than their individual parts are worth is the ultimate goal of geekdom. Stop criticizing and embrace the new tech !

    GPS AND blogging together could be the next big thing !

    Remember, young man ! You must always remember your actual position before patronizing fellow netizens with such pontificating verbiage !

    (Note | This Mail was posted with Iphone V4 GPS/WiMax Geomicroblogging tool, from coordinates 2.34784, 48.82003 - [Toilettes Publiques] 75 Paris 13 (84 Boulevard Kellermann) - FR - 00.03 AM)

    [/end of joke alert tag]

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  44. I Do Think It Would Be Ineresting... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    I do feel it would be interesting if my mobile phone was able to tell me what was going of interest next to me based on my location. Even who else of interest might be standing nearby. Not quite what they're talking about here, but to stand at an intersection and have information about the shops and interesting sites within a 2 block area sorted by distance would be pretty neat.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:I Do Think It Would Be Ineresting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I'm going to agree with this. I'm as fond of my tinfoil hat as the next /.-er however I actually was interested in this (in concept) the other day.

      I'm sitting at home when a helicopter starts doing circles over my neighborhood. After 3 or 4 laps I was kindof curious what it was up to. After 7 or 8 I was really curious. Having spent plenty of time in LA, the 'ghetto-birds' circling near your house usually does not bode well. I thought to myself, 'gee, it might be interesting if something like twitter could be localized' so that if I query 'hey, there's a helicopter flying around. anybody know what it's doing?' I might actually get answers from people looking at the same helicopter.

      Oh well. It was probably a pipe dream. I'm sure that the applied experience would simply render a lot of folks chatting about their bathroom routine, but with coordinates.

  45. Finally... by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    A way to find twitter idiots and flashmob them into non-existence. Excellent.

    --
    Sig this!
  46. To what end? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    And yes, my language is harsh, but I don't suffer whiny losers like you very well, especially when they don't accept responsibility for their situation and claim impotence in changing it.

    And yet, worded differently the same advice would have gotten +5, Insightful and influenced many more people.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  47. moving to a great attractor by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    either we'll have information about everyone anytime, anywhere or...


    just the gov't will have that capability.


    both cases are still great examples of information overload... What ever happen to computers "helping"?

  48. FireEagle has nothing to do with blogging by geomobile · · Score: 1

    I was lucky enough to hear this talk.

    FireEagle is a service that allows decoupling location information consumers from location information providers. It handles metadata on how the this information was obtained as well as user rights.

    It's not a blogging service. Actually, I don't think it will be of interest to a lot of end-users at all.
    It's more of a service to application developers. It can be a very useful service if adopted widely. May be compare it to OpenID for location or something. It shouldn't be seen as another geo-blog thing.

  49. glad you were able to see that by unity100 · · Score: 1

    now, how would you like to buy my new book about "Geostationaryonlineshitting" ?

  50. I respond ... by unity100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Geonlineresponsing ...

    (Note | This "Geostationaryonlineposting" Post was posted with AMD 4800+ Dual core/PlainOldEthernet IBM PC Compatible tool, from coordinates 3242.3384, 2265648.55384603 - [Livingroomores Cajoles] 138 Antalya 24 (96 Boulevard Rigavigsdak) - TR - 07.07 AM, from approx 3.5 m distance to the loo. (margin of error ± 50 cm)

    Geostantionaryonlineposting - brought to you by the same internet which introduced you to Megaonlineshitting. stay tuned.

  51. Re:I can't wait to blog from the summit of Everest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got home a few hours ago from Canada Day celebrations that were concluded with fireworks. I almost spazzed at a guy who was standing near me trying to capture the fireworks on his cell phone camera (of course it was too dark, and so he stood there bitching and complaining about how the camera wasn't capturing anything decent). People like him anger me, and unfortunately the percentage of the population being molded into that type of behaviour is rising.

    I just don't understand people who have this insatiable desire/need to videotape everything. Life must be pretty fracking dull to think that video footage is more important than actively participating in events.

    Technology may make some aspects of life more convenient, but I truly believe it does much more harm than good.

  52. Will it really work? by ciryon · · Score: 1

    I wonder if technology will actually deliver now. It's pointless to use Twitter or Jaiku on the move if it takes 10 seconds or more just to determine your position. Might not sound much, but it has to be very fast to be usable and the situation right now with current iPhone is not working with positioning over wifi or cell towers. One solution would be to let you quickly scribble something, put the phone in your pocket and let it "update" your message automatically with location info once it's available.

  53. Twitter + GPS + Wikimapia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've long dreamed of an update utility that could translate geographical coordinates into automatic updates on Tiwtter, facebook etc.
    eg "AC is at the Museum of Modern Art, in New York." or "AC is turning his phone off at Heathrow Airport" etc. If you're into letting people know where you are, and what you're doing, an automated system could be pretty cool.

  54. GeoMICROblogging?! by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

    It should be GeoNANOblogging! Keep with the times!

  55. Poop by anarkavre · · Score: 1

    I don't see how it can't change the world ... it has 'Micro' and 'Blog' in the name, and I'll always know where I was when I twittered to tell everyone I was in the john.

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/

    --
    "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
  56. Still not buzzwordy enough! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    GeoNanoVirtualCloudSnarfPodBlogCasting 2.0! Booyashaka!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  57. The point is discovering your peers by TeknoDragon · · Score: 1

    Having used a "GMB" site (brightkite.com) I can say the point is to discover your peers rather than simply squawk your location for no reason.