Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Twitter Competitor Emerges

ruphus13 writes "Twitter has had a lot of public woes with Open Source technologies like Ruby on Rails, and a lot of alternatives have sprung up in the micro-blogging world, but no one has managed to dislodge twitter in its usage or appeal. Now, an Open Source alternative by Identi.ca, backed by project Laconica has emerged. From the article, 'It supports OpenID for logins, is completely free software, and is designed to apply a Creative Commons license to all the traffic that it carries. It's also built to support the OpenMicroBlogging protocol, meaning that (at least in theory) it can attack scalability issues by federating together multiple autonomous servers. The underpinnings of Laconica include PHP, PEAR, and XMPP. You can download a tarball of the source, or check it out directly if you're using Darcs (there's also an unofficial mirror on Google Code, giving you Subversion access for a read-only copy).' The community will still need to work on this, if a true competitor to Twitter is to emerge. It is lacking APIs, and SMS integration. Oh, and millions of users!"

95 comments

  1. @slashdot by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Taking a dump, will read this later.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:@slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no need to post any more comments.
      This one wins.

    2. Re:@slashdot by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Beautiful, ontopic first post.

      Twitter is overhyped, with a very small percentage of the world (mostly in the valley) yelling into an echo chamber, convincing themselves that the resulting din is a result of the platform's success.

      Where once people penned carefully authored essays, they then started writing papers. That was too much effort, so they started making articles. Articles were too much trouble so poorly researched, error-filled, rashly composed blog posts became the new norm.

      That was too much hassle so now people just puke everything they think on Twitter.

      Twitter is a service, and remarkably few care whether it is "open source" or not (though they do care that it is purportedly terribly unreliable). Oooh, but this one is designed to apply a Creative Commons license to people's finger spews? Come on.

    3. Re:@slashdot by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      Not only that, but - last I heard - SMS integration is one of the core features of twitter. Yet this "competitor" doesn't happen to do that. Should be quite the one horse right there. My moneys on both dying out in the long run.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    4. Re:@slashdot by hostyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... one horse race ...

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    5. Re:@slashdot by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where once people penned carefully authored essays, they then started writing papers. That was too much effort, so they started making articles. Articles were too much trouble so poorly researched, error-filled, rashly composed blog posts became the new norm.

      Essays, papers, articles and blog posts are all the same thing. The only exception is that a blog post is tied to a specific medium. Think about it - everything you say about blog posts can just as easily apply to the others.

      • Poorly researched, error-filled, rashly composed essay
      • Poorly researched, error-filled, rashly composed paper
      • Poorly researched, error-filled, rashly composed article

      The same works in reverse. The good qualities of essays can apply to the others as well:

      • Carefully authored blog post
      • Carefully authored article
      • Carefully authored paper

      A blog post is just the modern-day essay. On average, the quality of blog posts may be dire, but that's because a) more people are in a position to spend their time writing, b) more people are inclined to do so, and c) all are available a click away rather than the cream of the crop being reproduced in libraries or wherever. That's one hell of a selection bias.

      Twitter is intrinsically different. It's limited to one or two sentences. It's only useful for throwing out a single thought. You can't elaborate. You can't form an argument. You can't support an argument with evidence. It's superficial by its very nature.

      But does this really matter? Twitter isn't designed to replace blog posts, or articles, or papers, or essays. It isn't used for that purpose. It's a way of just throwing out a single nugget of information. Can that information be trivial and useless, for instance, "taking a dump, BRB"? Sure. Can it be useful, for instance letting people know about a service update? Sure.

      Twitter isn't useless, and it isn't part of a trend. Overhyped, yes. Often used for stupid things, yes. But the link between Twitter and more serious communication is tenuous at best. The difference between Twitter and blog posts is like the difference between leaning over to another desk and mentioning something to a colleague compared with sending a company-wide memo. They are simply different things.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    6. Re:@slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Essays, papers, articles and blog posts are all the same thing

      Not really. They have varying levels of formality, and the expectations and effort *generally* differs dramatically between them.

      Of course there are those who abuse the terminology, but I do think it's a pretty clean differentiation between them.

      And a lot of people are seeing Twitter as the replacement for blogging.

    7. Re:@slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love you

    8. Re:@slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think this is partly what the "Medium is the message" means.

      "Essays, papers, articles and blog posts are all the same thing" in that they include words. The difference is the actual content or meaning that is typically included.

      No one would dispute that it is possible that a blog post could be just as insightful and well thought out as an essay. Same for a twitter post. That they rarely are is a function of the medium.

    9. Re:@slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to include Slashdot. It comes right after blog posts, and before twitter. You're just one level above the bottom feeders...

    10. Re:@slashdot by JoshJ · · Score: 1

      What do you think about this particular set of twitter posts?

    11. Re:@slashdot by dodecalogue · · Score: 1

      I bet many of those people asking MarsPhoenix questions don't even have proper degrees! How truly far we have fallen...

      but of course there's a nonsarcastic part to that, in that you see a lot of repeated questions, whereas in a more formalized Q&A people would be more careful avoiding redundancy (well sometimes). It's not about educated/uneducated or "smart"/"dumb", it's about controlling flow in such a way as to address FAQs before they're asked. You learn letters before you learn verbs and if there's a bottleneck of people confused about what a word is, you insert that between letters and verbs. "omg asparagus on mars??" happens, but the good thing is that they aren't obligated to answer everyone's question.

  2. CC LIcense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'It supports OpenID for logins, is completely free software, and is designed to apply a Creative Commons license to all the traffic that it carries. ...

    What? Does it just slap a CC license on any thing posted on it?

    1. Re:CC LIcense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I was wondering that too, on the site it says

      "Unless otherwise specified, contents of this site are copyright by the contributors and available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
      . Contributors should be attributed by full name or nickname."

      Which i would take to mean that it does specifically put a CC license on everything unless you specify otherwise.

      I think it would be better for it to be copyright the poster first and CC opt in, since fair use (at least in the US) would cover any use of messages posted with the service given the limited length available.

    2. Re:CC LIcense? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Yep. It enforces Create Commons licence on everything you write. They seem to think this is a good thing.

      I'm partial to choice myself.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:CC LIcense? by amolapacificapaloma · · Score: 1

      No, it is suggested, but you can choose not licensing your feed in the registration process.

      --
      exp(i*pi)+1=0
  3. The twitter version of your post: by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beautiful, ontopic first post.

    Twitter is overhyped, with a very small percentage of the world (mostly in the valley) yelling into an echo chamber, convincing th

    Maybe /. should try enforcing a 160 character limit for posts.

    It'd certainly take the wind out of rants and loooooong posts.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:The twitter version of your post: by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to see things more concise.

      "Christ, I love Greek! I stuck my wang in her pooper. The end."

    2. Re:The twitter version of your post: by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      Maybe /. should try enforcing a 160 character limit for posts.

      No no no, it should be a 160 character minimum. And it should be combined with an improved lameness filter, so people would have to actually think before posting, or perhaps even read the articles, so that they'd have at least 160 characters of useful things to say.

    3. Re:The twitter version of your post: by phulegart · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      {sarcasm} oh, yeah... because what the world, and slashdot, needs is more pandering to people who can't read more than 30 words without having their brain seize up. {/sarcasm}

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    4. Re:The twitter version of your post: by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I think it's telling that most Slashdotters never RTFA. People come here for the comments (which aren't as interesting as they used to be, but ...). Anyway, Slashdot is useful because the community is/was great.

      On the other hand, I'll do myself a disservice and admit that I use Digg to find articles to read. I don't however, read the comments.

      My point is ... radically changing the comment method on Slashdot would be a big mistake.

    5. Re:The twitter version of your post: by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      Nah, twitter is for people who don't have the attention span for a TV commercial.

      It amazes me what the attention-deficient online think is too long.

      Many of you will never get this far in this post :)

    6. Re:The twitter version of your post: by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never is such a strong word. A lot of times the comments are more interesting than TFA, but when pictures or a video are required, or the subject is something damn cool - like that 3D display or advanced prosthetic limbs - then it's sometimes worth skimming the article.

      It's amazing how easily massive offtopic conversations appear near the top of articles though. Even worse, I usually want to finish reading the offtopic discussion and sometimes just don't get to the actual on-topic discussion..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:The twitter version of your post: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah there would be no way to get round that.

      It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other wayâ"in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.

    8. Re:The twitter version of your post: by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the slashdot crew has said the vast majority of slashdotters only ever click the article links and don't read the comments much less post to them.

      --
      Why not fork?
    9. Re:The twitter version of your post: by phulegart · · Score: 1

      wow.. from the moderation on my post, I guess that we already have too many people who can't read more than 30 words... and they are now the standard.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
  4. Great by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's all we need. An open source sockpuppet. Since open source software is usually better it will be able to mask as a regular /.er more effectively. Damn you open source and your effectiveness!

    Oh wait, the other Twitter...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Great by Macthorpe · · Score: 3, Funny

      That Twitter is pretty much open source already...

      Anyway, in his defense, he's been pretty good with using only the one account recently - and although I don't agree with anything he says, I'm perfectly alright with him expressing it as long as he's stopped resorting to the shilling that got all his accounts karmabombed.

      Yes, that includes all the times I apparently threatened to kill him, which he has apparently diligently recorded. There goes a man with no sarcasm-meter.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who might not know what this is about, context.

  5. what is it? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What use has twitter!?
    how useful can one-liners even be!?

    1. Re:what is it? by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Rodney Dangerfield made a career of them?

    2. Re:what is it? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but did it get him any respect?

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    3. Re:what is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One-liners suck!

  6. The innovation value chain by ka9dgx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The users of twitter got upset that the service was down so much, but all the blogging in the world doesn't do as much good as a single pissed off programmer who actually did something about it, and wrote something to start to replace twitter.

    That single programmer probably wouldn't have made much of a dent in the situation, but another pissed off programmer took his work, and made it work on his system, twice and got federation to work, then wrote to tell the rest of us about it.

    It was only after this that the blogosphere actually has a snowballs chance in hell of adding any value, by making sure that other people know about the efforts of these two programmers (and all of the ones before them).

    As he said over at 0xDECAFBAD, '...ideas are fucking worthless', it's actually adding some value to the ideas, no matter how big or small, that get the snowball rolling in the right direction.

    I hope this post helps someone else see how open source really works. If not, it's fucking worthless.

    --Mike--

    1. Re:The innovation value chain by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      In that vein, then just making an alternative in itself doesn't count either. The article says that there have been several alternatives that didn't manage to catch on.

    2. Re:The innovation value chain by ka9dgx · · Score: 1
      Exactly... somewhere I heard that it takes about 5 people to get an open source project off the ground. Perhaps this is another aspect of some grand rule, the guy who wrote indenti.ca, the guy who got it working and federated, and shoulders of at least 3 other people they stood on.

      Ideas are great, everyone's got them... it's action that makes a difference. It's amazing how late in life you learn some of these lessons (I'm 44).

      --Mike--

  7. Identi.ca does NOT scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just look at the code. Identi.ca is NOT a scalable solution b/c it does NOT federate out message containers. However, it's a good thing it's open source so nobody can be duped by the uneducated claims.

    Resilient, scalable, multicast messaging is a SOLVED problem. Yet, nobody cares to apply the solution in practice. Hers is a starter for those who really want to created a federated Twitter competitor.
    http://research.microsoft.com/~antr/SCRIBE/default.htm

  8. Twitter has only one purpose for me: by Kabuthunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have an section on my website that posts my twitter. In plain text. No fancy background, image-heavy, 'sleek' looking background or whatnot... it's just straight, text that shows my last twitter. It's useful for posting why X thing is broken on my site if I notice a problem from work, or my computer crashes and I want to let people who visit my site know why there's no updates, stuff like that (since I can text a twitter from my cellphone). To keep it from showing the same downtime reason for weeks at a time, I update it every so often with whatever random thought. Once or twice a week tops.

    That said, the only reason I use Twitter is because it's the only application I've found that allows me to very easily and quickly post a quick informational update to my website no matter where I am (again, cellphone).

    If this open-source option allows that, I'm all for it. Otherwise, I'm not particularly pleased with Twitter as a whole. If anyone knows of any alternatives that allow me to do exactly what I use it for above, let me know... I'll bail Twitter if I can find a better alternative.

    --
    Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    1. Re:Twitter has only one purpose for me: by kyofunikushimi · · Score: 1

      Well, the open source option will allow for that when somebody plugs SMS into it. Problem is, a scalable SMS solution is bound to require some sort of $$$ behind it.

      --
      oo
    2. Re:Twitter has only one purpose for me: by charlieman · · Score: 1

      Just like paying for a hosting to place any other opensource cms...

    3. Re:Twitter has only one purpose for me: by jo42 · · Score: 1

      quickly post a quick informational update to my website no matter where I am

      If your cellphone can send emails, then create an email address off of your domain for status updates. Then peck out a short script to monitor that email address and post any message content to your website.

      Not only could you use your cellphone, but a web browser or email client on almost any platform to post updates.

  9. Tweet! by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 1

    All time favorite twitter that pretty much sums up Twitter: http://twitter.com/DieLaughing/statuses/247877862

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
    1. Re:Tweet! by shivamib · · Score: 0

      Well, is the monk still playing?

  10. Ummm.... by Otter · · Score: 1

    The community will still need to work on this, if a true competitor to twitter is to be had. It is lacking APIs, and SMS integration.

    I've never used Twitter so could be completely wrong about this, but: isn't SMS integration the entire freaking point of Twitter? And aren't APIs also kind of important, even more so than imposing a Creative Commons license on all traffic? (I know, I know, Shakespeare could never have written his plays if the Twitter traffic from previous generations hadn't been available for him to adapt.)

    Anyway, if I'm wrong, at least I'm still less useless than all the goofballs who know nothing about Twitter except that stupid Penny Arcade cartoon but still feel compelled to repeatedly reference that stupid Penny Arcade cartoon.

  11. The source license isn't the point by bitspotter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's cool to get a good license, no doubt. But the appeal of Twitter to me isn't the software license - it's the service provided. Specifically, it's the timely access they provide to the closed SMS network.

    For a while, I was using my wireless phone carrier's email gateway to send my phone text messages generated by server monitoring scripts. When their gateway got clogged and delayed, I discovered that Twitter wasn't. So now my monitors use the Twitter API.

    Other than for that, I wouldn't bother with Twitter - and I don't.

    So public licensing is nice, but unless they've somehow cracked the gates of the closed SMS network, I don't see much to be excited about.

    1. Re:The source license isn't the point by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Definition of irony: being a fan of Twitter because one of their APIs *isn't* overloaded.

    2. Re:The source license isn't the point by jo42 · · Score: 1

      cracked the gates of the closed SMS network

      $$$$$$ will opens the gates to SMS. Maybe Google will wake up one day and offer a free (i.e. funded by their advertising revenue - like everything else they give away) SMS gateway API, or at least make it really cheap to use by regular peoples.

  12. goodnewsbadnews by owlnation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's good that there's new and innovative uses for Open Source, the last thing the world needs is another fucking Twitter.

    Twitter is the singular most overhyped (and seemingly overstretched) and in-your-face viral spamming thing since Ron Paul and Facebook. Soooo much sock puppetry.

    It's just another dumb passing fad, and if you're not ZOMG 14 you'll probably never use it. Presumably some retard media giant will overpay for it, and then no-one will ever use it again -- just like all the others. The sooner the better please.

    The directors of Twitter are just another bunch of jerks who should be first against the wall come the revolution.

    1. Re:goodnewsbadnews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you're not ZOMG 14 you'll probably never use it."

      I'm pretty sure something like 3 out of the 500 people I interact with on twitter is 18. 21 for that matter. I don't get the hostility directed at OMG ITS A FAD and OMG ITS FOR KIDS. It might be a fad, but I cannot see how 'its for kids.'

      Unless by 'kids' you mean people who use facebook / blog / have cell phones / text message people.

      Crazy kids on my lawn, stealing my bandwidth.

    2. Re:goodnewsbadnews by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I think it's a nice tool. I started using Twitter when an old college pal introduced me to a local scene of young freelancers who used Twitter. I got to know a few interesting people through Twitter and tell me this: what's wrong with that?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  13. A limit on sockpuppetry by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe /. should try enforcing a 160 character limit for posts.

    Better yet: Enforce such a limit, but only for twitter and his socks ;-)

    1. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by TubeSteak · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Recently I've seen a lot of posts bitching and moaning about /. user twitter.

      http://web.sourceforge.com/terms-use

      Please report any violations of the Terms (except for claims of intellectual property infringement) to the SourceForge Site Director at admin@corp.sourceforge.com.

      If (s)he isn't violating the TOS, then just STFU & let it go.
      Otherwise, report the user and let the admins make up their mind.

      Complaining about it has obviously not caused Taco or the other Overlords to muzzle twitter.
      More importantly, karma works, twitter posts at 0 or -1, as do the sock puppet accounts.

      This is all offtopic, but it keeps coming up... And its funny:
      I don't see/notice twitter's posts, but I can't get away from the complaints about 'em.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Funny

      Complaining is a right covered by the First Amendment.

      Complaining about Twitter is a sport.

    3. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by micheas · · Score: 1

      First post about twitter that has made me laugh.

      Personally the whole thing is overdone, but then all sport is overdone, that's what makes it sport.

      Makes it easier to ignore twitter and those that complain about twitter.

    4. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twitter actually works for Microsoft. It's reverse psychology; he rants and rants against their evils in such an inane and idiotic manner that it makes people feel sympathy for Redmond.

      I'll bet they pay him a good bit for it too.

    5. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by adona1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Twitter is frustrating, because every now and then he'll write an insightful/interesting post, but end it by tying it in with teh evil of M$ or whatever he tends to complain about.
      However, the people who consistently follow him and his sock puppets around are even more annoying. I don't care that he's one person with umpteen accounts - I judge on a post by post basis, and if he sometimes says something worth listening to, good. If he doesn't (more often), well that's my issue for browsing at -1.

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    6. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      This post was right sporting of you, old boy.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    7. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I am quick to chide Hollywood for being too obvious, and not employing enough subtlety. Your theory would be an example of too much subtlety.
      Trying to bash Microsoft into a sympathetic pose on /. would be like hacking slashdot.org itself and trying to build sympathy for CdrTaco through systematic article duplication.
      Simply self-defeating.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    8. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I know. I was joking because he's accused me of being in the employ of MS, even though I post as much against them as I do for.

      It was humor ;)

    9. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see/notice twitter's posts, but I can't get away from the complaints about 'em.

      Well, you don't see them because they've been modded down into oblivion. Generally there's not much worth seeing in them anyway, but also generally they're not deserving of being modded down to -1. From what I've seen, his/her posts often involve some sweeping pro-linux statements -- and if you wanted to complain about that, you'd have to complain about most of the posters on this site.

      It's all a bit pathetic, childish and silly. But then, that's /. for you :)

      (Actually, and slightly more interestingly, the anti-twitter group seem to have gone so over the top in their modding-down that twitter's posts now get read and modded up -- take a look at the last posts in his userpage.)

      Sadly, I'm going to post this as an AC because I don't want to get caught in the cross-fire ...)

    10. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by somersault · · Score: 1

      It kind of is a good way to get people to be more sympathetic of MS though. Most slashdotters jump on any little mistake, and I personally can't help playing devil's advocate myself when I notice flaws in an argument. Arguing against twitter's inanity often ends up with people who in essence agree with twitter's views (but not the way he presents them), defending MS. That can only be good for them because I doubt most of us would have any reason to try to defend them otherwise.. they have made a few good products but they still keep fscking up all the time, and it's just demoralising how they can get away with it because of their market position.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:A limit on sockpuppetry by kv9 · · Score: 1

      I don't see/notice twitter's posts, but I can't get away from the complaints about 'em.

      you're getting metatrolled.

  14. What I use twitter for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use twitter to communicate with rememberthemilk, and I was bored one day so I set up accounts for my computers. So yeah, my computers can send me text messages and I can send them back. If twitter didn't have sms integration, it'd be worthless to me. If my server reboots, it twitters me. Yeah, it's pointless and I haven't thought of a real use. But whatever. =)

    I also (sorta..) pay attention to some feeds. Mainly the ones created by NASA people. The Phoenix twitter is really interesting, actually. But they could suddenly stop making posts and I wouldn't mind at all.

    Only a small slice of people really follow twitters. I think a microblog in combination with a normal blog is fine.. It allows for someone who people actually listen to in full essay form to make quick comments about things. Case in point: BadAstronomy, though he lacks the integration that would make his twitter feed more penetrating. Just having a microblog.. eh. What's the use.

    Several times I've thought about starting up a blog. But at this point in my life (starting my senior year in highschool), I'm going to spare the world about ramblings about nothing because I personally don't feel qualified to have a real opinion yet on anything important. I also do not have a facebook.

    I completely love the Open Source aspect of this. That's awesome. OpenID for the win. Yadda yadda.

    This isn't a major feat for the blogging community as a whole, but all the standards definitely lead to semantic web. I love xmpp for it's VoIP and file transfers and everything. (Then again, I use IRC moreso).

    Just imagine blogs and web3.0. <3

  15. What a life to lead by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's baffling to think this 'micro blogging' nonsense is really coming to the point where there's competition for it. Back in my day folks didn't particularly care if you were vacuuming, or watching a DVD. I guess one of the boons of this web 2.0 is convincing people that other people really really care what they're doing at any given time.

    Just for the record, I'm currently sitting at my desk in my underpants drinking whiskey right out of the bottle while openly weeping.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
    1. Re:What a life to lead by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      mmmm, whiskey

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    2. Re:What a life to lead by sitarah · · Score: 1

      Back in my day folks didn't particularly care if you were vacuuming, or watching a DVD.

      Sorry, but they did care. They want to know if it's Spiderman, because they've been meaning to watch that, too. They want to know if you're vacuuming because that means you can't go out with them, or that you'll be more likely to want to go to the bar after (depending on how you feel about vacuuming).

      Every single one of your friends didn't care about your activities, but there was a strong probability that at least one did. They wanted to participate, or they wanted something to talk about, or they wanted to hang out with any friend for an afternoon, whoever wasn't busy.

      Of my 5 friends, 4 don't care that I was at the state fair on Tuesday, but if friend #5 was iffy on going, now they can 1) ask me how it is 2) go and meet up with me. The other 4 ignore a 140 char message. Similarly, perhaps I post that I love the new cafe that opened on Washington Ave. The 2/5 friends who like to try new places to eat now have a "Someone said it was good" reference point. The other 3 discard the info.

      Twitter is basically an AIM away message or an email list. It's more portable (now I can get away messages on my phone! :p), and it's also very noncommittal -- my friends sign UP for my messages, rather than me making up an email list every time. It's also easier for you because you don't have to decide who you should tell when the information is so generic that any of your friends may or may not care.

      Depending on your type of friends or social life, maybe that's not interesting to you, but I think Twitter has a definite utility to many people. I don't think those people are necessarily braindead or vapid social butterflies as some ./ers imply, either.

  16. Oh boy, not here too by unity100 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "OpenMicroBlogging protocol" - we have recently had an article in /. shoving "geomicroblogging" up to us as a new buzzword, had a few laughs about the speed buzzwords are increasing ... made a few jokes myself, but i gotta admit, i would never expect to see a buzzword pushed as a goddamn PROTOCOL. nothing is safe now it seems. next in line will probably be stuff like "UppityGiggidyDataTransfer", "DiddlyDooNeighboring client" and "HeavenlyButtLoadBalancing" - quick !! run while you still have time - so you may keep your sanity.

    1. Re:Oh boy, not here too by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      That's UppityGiggidyDataTransfr. Didn't you learn anything about Web 2.0 naming conventions?

    2. Re:Oh boy, not here too by straponego · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad this thing isn't called gnitter.

  17. Why the Twitter hate? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is with the Twitter hate? Seriously, I want to know. I have barely encountered Twitter, and I have certainly not seen any "hype" about it, so maybe I just missed a wave of annoying news articles about it.

    The only use of Twitter I have seen is Fred of MegaTokyo's status feed which gives info on how far along Fred is with a comic or why a comic is late. Anyone who is familiar with MegaTokyo is probably familiar with MegaTokyo's common delays, so this info is very useful. The three most recent Twitter statuses appear on the website.

    Another poster mentioned that he also has a Twitter feed for website status and has the most recent one appear on the site.

    I usually see jokes about constant status updates via Twitter, but, well, no one is forcing you to read them; they are for the people who care about that person's status. Occasionally I am interested in when the next MegaTokyo comic will be posted, so I check his Twitter. I do not see how this is much different from IM status messages: usually if I want to get a vague idea of what my friends are up to, I can check their AIM away messages.

    --
    Centralization breaks the internet.
    1. Re:Why the Twitter hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually a new bit of technology or software is released it's discussed by a variety of people, so you get a pretty good idea of why it might be good (or applicable) or what's bad about it.

      With twitter, though, the only people I hear about twitter from are the sort of attention-deficit disorder douchebags who think that just because they've managed how to proudly power their wankery with wordpress that they're some kind of tech god whose opinions matter. Attention-seeking whores like Scoble fudge their Levis about twitter because not only does it reinforce their own perception of self worth, but also that they're "producing" something.

      But normal people? Or even your typical slashdot read? Not so much.

  18. PEAR?? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Seriously? Would anyone else consider using PEAR, In this the year of our Lord 2008? Why? Thats not going to scale any better than rails. I'd be very surprised if it scaled as good as rails. It always depends upon how much of it they're using, but you do not hear about large php sites using PEAR for a reason.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:PEAR?? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      PEAR, like CPAN for Perl, lets you slap shite together very quickly. Coding scalable stuff from scratch takes time and effort. At least they didn't write it using Java... :-p

  19. It's a sad day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you state your project uses PEAR as a technology. I don't think I've ever seen someone say "we code in perl and CPAN".

    Besides, unlike many languages where libraries are actually useful, I find people who use tons of PEAR packages to be not-so-great-programmers. Avoiding reinvention of the wheel can be a great thing, but not if the only reason you depend on PEAR to an extreme is because the only programming you're capable of is to apply glue between others' work.

    Sorry, little rambling about past coworkers.

  20. more proof it's different by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    These are user-acclaimed tweets, most of them just comedic, but some telling whole little stories.
    Thinking this way is a bit like trying to think haikus; perhaps why another competitor in the space is called Jaiku.

  21. Oh nowww I get it ... by donak · · Score: 1

    I thought he meant a core dump

    You technical people confuse me all the time ;-)

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
  22. perl -p -i -e 's/useless/insightful/' by gwolf · · Score: 1

    There, I just made insightful all your useless rants. And I still have 100 characters left!

    1. Re:perl -p -i -e 's/useless/insightful/' by makomk · · Score: 1

      Mmm... pie

  23. perhaps even read the articles by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    You, sir, are daft.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  24. essays twitter by Clith · · Score: 1
    Complaining that essays > blog posts > twitter is like complaining that sex > kissing > handshakes.

    Each has its own purpose.

    --
    [ReidNews]
  25. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    twitter is for twits. end of story.

  26. What exactly does Twitter do? by carlzum · · Score: 1

    Why is Twitter consistently included in the list of over-hyped "Web 2.0" sites? From what I've read it only has a fraction of the active users other sites have and doesn't appear to have features other sites lack. Twitter just seems like a less popular social networking site to me. Is it tweets (messages and updates pushed to your friends list)? Honestly I'm not very familiar with the site, so I must be missing something. Does anyone here use it and know what innovations they offer that MySpace, Facebook, etc. don't?

  27. Re:FUCK VIACOM , FUCK DA JEW by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

    A trolling parody account based on the main flamebate/troll-ish creator of parody accounts? The plot thickens.. are you the open source twitter competitor that TFA is talking about?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  28. Ruby on Rails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rails is used for the web front-end to Twitter. The scalability problems have mostly been with the backend architecture, and the fact that until recently they ran the service with remarkably few servers and staff. Using $YOUR_HOLY_FRAMEWORK would not have made much difference.

    Web tech can scale horizontally. It's not a big deal. Routing gazillions of messages centrally, that might not scale.

    XMPP is the long-term answer for this.

  29. I'll never understand the popularity of OpenID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tripcodes have been available for almost ten years, and are far simpler to implement.

  30. It's interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to note that no doubt many of us have at one time or another been thinking "I wonder what's happening behind that window right now" or "I wonder how many people within a hundred meters (or comparable local units of measure) of me are having sex right now" or "boy would it be cool to see the world through that other person's eyes" or "I wonder what that person's life is like". Admit it!

    Those of us with a childhood filled with superhero comicbooks have probably wished they could have "x-ray vision" (conveniently cutting through all the things you want it to and none of those you don't) to see into the neighbouring room, or to be able to fly to spy on people through otherwise unreachable windows or to be able to turn invisible and follow them around without them knowing. Fess up!

    With the rise of geotagging and the coming of live or near-live video feeds from all around us, we're now getting a glimpse into exactly those kind of situations. What was happening behind that wall or on the other side of the world. What someone else's life is like.

    Unfortunately the glimpse is less glamorous than I guess we all hoped for. These other people we would have loved to spy on before turn out to live ordinary enough lives - when they're not goofing off intentionally, knowing they're being watched, that is - and there's not nearly enough sex within a hundred meters of us.

    Bummer.

  31. Give Twitter a Break! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, give the guy a break. He offers up the service for free. As far as I know he's not even making a profit on it yet.

    I'm not against open source, I just feel their stealing the guys product, he doesn't even charge for it.

  32. like, who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ? just for the filter ?

  33. Twitter is SIMPLE. Who cares about alternatives? by remitaylor · · Score: 1

    Twitter is a really, really simple application. So why should anyone care about alternatives. Anyone who wants to make their own twitter is likely a web developer and they'll likely code it themselves ... or, not I guess they can use an alternative but ... who cares?

    The woes that Twitter has had have nothing to do with Ruby or Rails. It's a scaling issue. Even if Twitter were written in PHP or Python or Java or .NET or Perl or C or Assembly ... it wouldn't matter much. You would still need to put lots of hardware behind it if you had lots of traffic.

    Any competent web developer could make their own Twitter clone and deploy it as a small afternoon project ... does doesn't meet it'll scale to support thousands (or millions) of users.