Slashdot Mirror


Dell Colludes With RIAA, Disables Stereo Mix

RCTrucker7 writes with a link to a Maximum PC story, which begins: "Details of Dell's surreptitious collusion with RIAA (Record Industry Association of America) have emerged. Apparently, the computer manufacturer disabled the Stereo Mix/Mono Mix/Wave Out sound recording function on certain notebooks to assuage RIAA. The hardware functionality is being disabled without any prior notice and one blogger has even alleged that he was asked by Dell's customer support staff to [shell] out $99 if he desired the stereo mix option. Gateway and Pac Bell are the other two manufacturers to have bowed to RIAA at the expense of their customers' satisfaction and disabled stereo mix without warning." (There are some workarounds posted in the comments of the linked article.)

25 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Any...facts in this case? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know it's fun to use hearsay and draw wild conclusions which make a boogeyman out of various unpopular (some rightly so) parties, but is there anything here besides a bunch of conjecture and reporting of anecdote as fact?

    1. Re:Any...facts in this case? by minerat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope. If you trace back the trail of links, the link for appeasing the riaa goes to a forum post that only mentions the details of the registry workaround. This was already determined to be hearsay on days ago when the story broke. Congratulations to the /. editors for their diligence.

      --
      ...and you've eaten your pen. simply stunning.
    2. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Trails · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed. Techdirt had an article about this two days ago.

    3. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Artuir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, which is still mostly conjecture and RIAA bashing. I don't see any evidence they were involved - if someone's got REAL links with REAL data, let's have them! Linking to a Dell page with a workaround for an issue isn't proof of all the wild speculation making the rounds.

    4. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the techdirt link posted above:

      However, there seems to be no evidence whatsoever that the RIAA had any part in this. On the whole, it sounds like someone just made a bad decision in terms of how to configure certain sound cards. If someone can provide any evidence that the RIAA actually had a role in this, we'll post an update, but there's no reason to jump to conclusions without any evidence. That's what the RIAA does.

      Yep, plenty of facts! Can't get more conclusive than that! RIAA is caught red-handed.

      I guess FUD works both ways.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    5. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Gewalt · · Score: 5, Funny

      New headline then: Slashdot colludes with Trolls, posts flamebait article

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
  2. Next Story: by Deltaspectre · · Score: 5, Funny

    The MPAA has decided that asking large computer manufacturers to disable any Video Out options, so pirates are thwarted.

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
    1. Re:Next Story: by edalytical · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oddly enough the screenshot feature of Mac OS X is disabled when you are playing a DVD. I'd take a screenshot of the error message, but I obviously can't.

      This seems to be the current trend. You can't print bank notes from Photoshop, you can't record audio on your computer, you can't take screenshots. I'm sure this is just scratching the surface of treacherous computing...

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    2. Re:Next Story: by Oronar · · Score: 5, Informative

      You have to turn your hardware acceleration off.

      Right-click
      Properties
      Settings Tab
      Advanced
      Troubleshoot Tab
      Drag slider to the left

      Take you pictures and just slide it back to the right.

      --
      1 4/\/\ 1337
    3. Re:Next Story: by LordRPI · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, the RIAA is pushing OB/GYNs to disable the hearing component of newborn babies brain's at birth. A special chip will be implanted and used to re-enable hearing at a cost of $99. As an easter egg, this chip will automatically deduct $0.99 from the parent's bank account anytime the baby has a tune stuck in their head.

    4. Re:Next Story: by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually you can still take screenshots. There are three easy ways. One is to use Grab.app. Another is to use the 'screencapture' command line tool in Terminal. And lastly you can use any third-party screen capture program. Apple half-assedly only disables the standard keyboard shortcuts. This is typical of their compliance with required terms for media playback. For example, the standard DVD player contract also requires making a reasonable effort to disable debuggers. Apple does this by calling ptrace(PT_DENY_ATTACH, 0, 0, 0) during application startup. This causes the application to crash if it's being run in the debugger, and causes any debugger attached to the application later to crash. It's laughably easy to work around, though; just set a breakpoint on the ptrace function, then tell the debugger to return immediately when it's hit. Presto!

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    5. Re:Next Story: by NetNifty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In KPDF, go into the Settings Menu / Configure KPDF and untick "Obey DRM Restrictions".

  3. Why is RIAA asking this? by BabbageTuring · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this to prevent home grown artists from recording their own high quality material?

    1. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Is this to prevent home grown artists from recording their own high quality material?

      As a musician, I would want to challenge this as abridgement of my rights, and I'd want to make a (worth $Billions$) anti-trust case out of it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Lumenary7204 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Parent modded as "Funny", but you know, the "Independent musician invoking antitrust against the RIAA" thing might just have something going for it.

      Too bad you'd need a huge chunk of capital just to get the legal ball rolling...

    3. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >It isn't about recording audio input from microphones, it is about making a copy of whats going out to the speakers.

      Don't try to dictate to me how I may, or may not, use my tools, thank you.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by gnuASM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What has been disabled is the loopback, which lets you record the music that the computer is playing. Youtube for example.

      Yeah, or even your own LEGALLY COPYRIGHTED drum/beat/synthesizer loops. Or even the audio off your home videos to use for your own LEGAL reuse in your own LEGAL compilation home videos. Or even your own LEGAL automated answering service that may need to record messages. Or any of a plethora of other LEGAL uses.

      As a poster has already stated, do NOT tell me how I should/can or shouldn't/cannot use MY hardware.

  4. This is just another useless annoyance by ShadowWraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this is true, what does the RIAA intend to gain from this? It won't stop or even discourage piracy. People recording streams or radio broadcasts do have easy access to simple tape recorders, and mass distribution pirates will simply use a different machine. All this does is annoy people and put a dent in Dell's sales. What is the point???

  5. Re:packard bell? by germansausage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just like David Hasselhoff!

  6. Sometimes... by nexuspal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish Slashdot had a mechanism to mod news stories into oblivion... Especially ones like this, with no real facts, and no basis in reality...

    --
    I've read Slashdot for the last 5 years, and now I start posting... Go figure :-P
  7. Re:Use? by LO0G · · Score: 5, Informative

    What's also funny is that typically the Stereo Mix functionality is implemented post-DAC. So when you're recording from stereo mix, the signal goes:

    Output->DAC->ADC->Stereo Mix

    So modulo electrical noise on the microphone and headphone jack, you get essentially the same result you'd get as if you went:

    Output->DAC->Headphone Jack-> $6.00 Cable->Line In Jack->ADC->Line In

  8. I just wanted to say... by DrWinston0Boogie · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... that I encountered this issue just yesterday for the first time on a new Dell laptop (with SigmaTel sound) when I needed to record from the stereo mix -- for lawful uses, mind you.

    I did some googling of my own and found other users who located a Dell driver (R171789) for XP that can be installed in Vista using the XP-SP2 compatibility mode option. I found this driver, installed it as prescribed, went into Vista's Recording Devices, told it to show and enable all disabled devices, and boom, there was my stereo mix. So far I have been recording without any issues.

    So yeah, without question it sucks that I even had to go through that, but it took me 10 minutes of research and even less than that to enable and configure.

    I hope this helps somebody.

  9. Re:Use? by billcopc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yep it's ridiculous but true. For all you disbelievers, try recording "silence" on your Stereo Mix. Not so silent now, is it ?

    I actually hadn't used this feature in ages, but I did a few weeks ago to rip a friend's tune on some lame-ass artist site... the MP3 download was "disabled" and the guy wasn't answering his phone, so I just recorded the streamed output from my onboard sound. Hello noise! I was seeing -48db peaks, maybe -58db average; it's almost inaudible but still not what I expected.

    So just to be sure it wasn't the actual source file that was noisy, I did the same thing via my old M-Audio Audiophile 2496, using its "Monitor Mixer", and that one was perfectly clean. I would expect any card with an Envy24 chip to perform the same, as it does this virtual mixing at the digital stage, right on the chip.

    There used to be a nice "virtual audio cable" freeware, but Google only turns up some $30 whoreware offering that's clogging up the index.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  10. Re:Use? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this MAY be only for the 'junk' cards like creative.

    yes, you heard me. creative resamples (!) to 48k. always. even if the input is ALREADY at 48k!

    historically, they have been evil like this.

    and so, its not surprising that you get resampled junk when you put silence on the input.

    also, while I'm on the subject, 'dolby digital LIVE' is also junk. it tried to convert regular stereo to '5.1' but it does some analog conversions (I'm pretty sure) where you should have an all digital chain. the fidelity is NOT there, its NOT good and should be avoided. if you have 2 channel audio, just LEAVE it as 2 channel and don't get caught in this marketing LIE about upsampling to 5.1 channel mode. you gain nothing good from that and the DD live chipsets are junk.

    good ones: cmedia (cmi) 8738 series. better one: envy24 chipset. those do NOT resample and are bit-perfect.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  11. Re:What editors? by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm eight and have ADD, you insensitive.. LOOK! A BUNNY!