Slashdot Mirror


Google Blogger "Hosts 2% of World's Malware"

Barence writes "Google's Blogger service is responsible for 2% of the world's malware hosted on the Web, according to a new report from security firm Sophos. The company claims hackers are setting up pages on the free blogging service to host malicious code, or simply posting links to infected websites in other bloggers' comments. 'Blogger accounts for around 2% of malware,' according to Sophos's senior technology consultant, Graham Cluley. 'It's head and shoulders above the rest [of the blogging services].'" Sophos believes that Blogger is favored because, being part of Google, it gets spidered early and often.

134 comments

  1. Malware Mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's a gigantic amount of user data.

    Even malware bot writers are users that might buy something....

  2. A warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I installed Linux it asked me for my credit card number. Two days later I got a call from Wachovia asking me if I had purchased $400 worth of Totino's pizza rolls and Mountain Dew (I hadn't). Let this be a warning to all of you out there in the Internet.

    1. Re:A warning by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have money in an offshore account left to me by my dying dog may he rest in Jesus' arms, $30,000,000 MILLION USD. Please act as my feduciary agent in moving this moneys safely onshore, and I shall with you share 10%, that is $10,000 THOUSAND USD.

    2. Re:A warning by Darkk · · Score: 1

      I don't ever give out my credit card info to sites like that. I've donated money to Linux distro sites via paypal so this sort of thing doesn't happen.

      I'm sure the bank will take care of those fraudsters.

      P.S. Wachovia reported nearly $9B loss last quarter so things are little bleak at the moment.

    3. Re:A warning by CastrTroy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      10% of 30,000,000 is 3,000,000. Also, what is meant by 30,000,000 MILLION? Is it 30,000,000,000,000 or is the Million just redundant wording?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:A warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woooosh!

    5. Re:A warning by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      It's funny that you complained about all the "mistakes" in a post that was clearly a spoof and missed complaining about the spelling error.

      No, wait, not funny: sad. It's sad.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    6. Re:A warning by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I have money in an offshore Blogger account left to me by...

      I hate to see a good joke go off topic...

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    7. Re:A warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which flavor? I mean the linux not the pizza

    8. Re:A warning by LaurensVH · · Score: 1

      I have money in an offshore account left to me by my dying dog may he rest in Jesus' arms, $30,000,000 MILLION USD. Please act as my feduciary agent in moving this moneys safely onshore, and I shall with you share 10%, that is $10,000 THOUSAND USD.

      You sir, look like an excellent candiate for our recent job opening here at Verizon!

  3. Appropriate actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps a good reason why blogging should be illegal.

    1. Re:Appropriate actions by Wiarumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, we should start a blog about that!

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    2. Re:Appropriate actions by nfk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny. I know you're joking (I hope), but I can't tell whether it's the "blogging is stupid" joke, or the "since this technology can be used for evil, let's ban it" joke.

    3. Re:Appropriate actions by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because we all know that when blogging is a crime, only criminals will blog!

      or something like that

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Appropriate actions by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Serial killers anyway... they can't seem to resist the urge to brag.

    5. Re:Appropriate actions by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Quick, someone call Andrew Cuomo!

    6. Re:Appropriate actions by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a good reason why blogging should be illegal.

      Screw this freedom of speach crap, I'm moving to Cuba !

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    7. Re:Appropriate actions by steelfood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why couldn't it be both?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    8. Re:Appropriate actions by BlastQuake · · Score: 1

      http://ubersoft.net/ Current story on blogging from the 'Technology is not your friend' dept.

      --
      "What use is power to the Keeps of Balance?" -Disnt of Nightmare LpMud
    9. Re:Appropriate actions by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      <NRA>Blogs don't spread malware, people spread malware.

    10. Re:Appropriate actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will I still be able to Blag? Maybe I'll start hosting my own Wobsite

    11. Re:Appropriate actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 5 years ago I initiated a free blog at let's say abcblog.com. Just kept it alive and then one day I got an email from them saying I hadn't posted in 6 months. So I took the hint and posted regularly. When I visited blog site I was in for a shock. It had been redesigned like facebook as I read - as I have never been to facebook. I kept getting messages saying you have no friends, associates, contacts, a whole list of cross connections including no bio or picture. They were absolutely correct. I simply post. But it was scary. Bogs are awesome because you can post publicly to the entire planet earth but at the same time, if you don't write about yourself or others, it is too boring for anyone to visit or be interested in.

    12. Re:Appropriate actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet Russia, multiple jokes frown upon YOU!

    13. Re:Appropriate actions by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a good reason why blogging should be illegal.

      This being Slashdot, a technical *blog*, this must have been the shortest least disciplined boycott attempt there ever was.

    14. Re:Appropriate actions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a good reason why blogging should be illegal.

      Who needs another reason?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Appropriate actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know your being funny, but yes they do
      who doesnt patch their machines
      who clicks or installs all those shady *.exe files
      etc...

  4. Two percent is newsworthy? by gurps_npc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I call FARK. Two percent is not newsworthy. You need at least 5% to impress me.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Two percent is newsworthy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Furthermore,

      or simply posting links to infected websites in other bloggers' comments

      Does that mean that slashdot contains 76% of the world's goatse, simply because trolls post links to other servers hosting it on this site?

      Perhaps Microsoft has 18.9% of the worlds child porn because it can be found by using their Windows Live search engine?

    2. Re:Two percent is newsworthy? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My % is bigger than your %.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Two percent is newsworthy? by mark72005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or Windows because 99% of it can be found on Windows PCs.

    4. Re:Two percent is newsworthy? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "Blogger accounts for around 2% of malware," according to Sophos's senior technology consultant, Graham Cluley.

      Is this two percent a plurality?

      "It's head and shoulders above the rest

      Oh, apparently--

      [of the blogging services]."

      ... not?

      Does Sophos only survey blogs?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. 2%? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come on, Google bloggers, that's less than Apple's marketshare! Surely we can do better than that!! Let's get to work!!

  6. Users or Malware Study? by Prysorra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're assuming its just the Malware's eyes they're after. Perhaps a study of the spread of Malware through Google would tell us something about their culture? Their will of course be somewhat disconnected clouds of competing bot swarms. Perhaps studying the shape of these clouds and how they choose to connect might help us combat their effectiveness?

    1. Re:Users or Malware Study? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps studying the shape of these clouds and how they choose to connect might help us combat their effectiveness?

      Yes! I see it! They're like a pack of wolves! No, Wild Horses! Wait no, Camels. Ahhh! It's an avalanche! Run!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  7. Voggers by C_Kode · · Score: 1, Funny

    I host the other 98% on voggers.com ;)

    1. Re:Voggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the one run by the vogons?

  8. Meanwhile... by oahazmatt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile...

    Cut to Steve Ballmer screaming at some programmers.
    Ballmer: Two percent?
    Programmer: Sir, we..
    Ballmer: Two percent?! I told you twenty!
    Programmer: We're trying. It's just...
    Ballmer: Just what?
    Programmer: There's so much other malware coming out, that it throws our percentages off.
    Ballmer: Then hire them!
    Programmer: Who? The malware authors?
    Ballmer: Do you have a problem with that?
    Programmer: I don't think it's ethical.
    Ballmer: Tony Stark built this in a cave! With a bunch of scraps!
    Programmer: ...what?

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      A bit off topic, but when I saw Iron Man, when the CEO guy was saying something like "Now that I have this power I'm going to kill you!" I heard "Now that I have this power I'm going to fucking kill Google."

  9. Malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Malware, let's see, that's one of those features of Windows, right? Maybe it's about time Google warned all its users about the dangers of surfing the net with a vulnerable browser/OS combination. What's Microsoft going to do, sue? Truth is a defense against defamation claims.

  10. Googles name by b4thyme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Part of it is probably google's good name that is attractive to malware hosts. As google "does no evil", people trust them. How could malware end up on a site hosted by a service that does no evil?

    people think:
    google = good
    malware = evil
    malware != google

    profit for malware distributors!

    1. Re:Googles name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't know about that - the type of people who get malware are generally pretty clueless. For example, why would they know that "blogger.com" is part of Google?

    2. Re:Googles name by b4thyme · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about that - the type of people who get malware are generally pretty clueless. For example, why would they know that "blogger.com" is part of Google?

      I would assume because it has google's name on the main blogger.com page?

    3. Re:Googles name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but its not hosted on the main blogger page, its hosted on some sub-domain of blogspot.com

    4. Re:Googles name by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Part of it is probably google's good name that is attractive to malware hosts.

      It's a lot more likely that it's just really easy to automate setting up a blog on Blogger and then customizing the template to host malware. It's not like setting up a blog using Wordpress or Movable Type or even Livejournal. I don't think it's got anything to do with "Google's good name" - you don't see the name "Google" anywhere in a blogger url.

      Not sure what Google can do about it, though - set up captchas for editing templates? Who knows. They can't take away the ability to edit templates or nobody's going to use them anymore. I have definitely noticed that a lot of the blogger blogs I click on during blog searches try to get me to install various bits of crapware, though. Yesterday, I hit one that almost forced me to reboot my machine before I could get rid of it (only furiously hitting the "x" button over and over faster than the popups could refresh cleared it - and yes, I'm using Firefox).

      How long until Google just decides this service is more trouble than it's worth? It's already way behind the other blog systems out there in terms of features.

      oh, btw, Google does *not* spider blogger blogs any faster than any other blogs or site. I've got a Wordpress blog and two Blogger blogs, and they're spidered at the exact same rate and usually on the exact same days (I also use Google webmastertools). So maybe that's a misconception that the malware authors have, or maybe it's just an assumption by the article submitter. But it isn't true in any case.

    5. Re:Googles name by miraboo · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning is incomplete. You need: good != evil. Assume Nothing.

  11. What, no evil comments yet? by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Don't be evil. Just host it."

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:What, no evil comments yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      slowpoke.jpg

    2. Re:What, no evil comments yet? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding! If this was a Microsoft-hosted blogging service, there'd already be 20 posts about the lack of commentary if this were a Google-hosted service. Which it is. Which means there's not.

      Profit.

    3. Re:What, no evil comments yet? by Phurge · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Don't be evil. Just host it."

      and serve ads to it

      --
      I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
    4. Re:What, no evil comments yet? by Kugrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hopefully their crawlers are advanced enough to display ads for Malware removal tools alongside the infected pages.

  12. Maybe the site should be an IE free zone? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    Isn't it the predominant conduit between the infected pages and the users? And ask people to upgrade to a secure browser with a links to Firefox, Opera and safari.

    1. Re:Maybe the site should be an IE free zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What? Are you crazy ? Seperate the retards that read from the retards that write? Inconceivable!

      h.e

    2. Re:Maybe the site should be an IE free zone? by Nutria · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Maybe the site should be an IE free zone? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Why ask?
      <!--[if IE]> <style type="text/css"> * { display: none; } </style> <![endif]-->

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Maybe the site should be an IE free zone? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Any browser that has a link to download something and does not allow the user to download it could be considered to be "secure". But unfortunately I do not know of any browser that is secure in that sense. When the user clicks on the link "Get hot sex now!!!", downloads and runs the "get hot sex now" installer they pretty much leave themselves wide open to whatever.

      Security would be disallowing that action. I do not see any security on the horizon.

  13. Google gets 2% by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 2, Funny

    of the money I just inherited from this kind Nigerian Prince!

  14. Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blogger is popular for spam redirects, because it's possible to turn a Blogger page into a redirect. Typical example: "Looking for a R0lex repl1ca? ... Where? At http://www.mitch83393.blogspot.com/" (Google already got this one as a TOS violation, but they're throwaway blogs generated by programs. There will be a new one in a few minutes.) Spammers do this to get their message through filters that check for spam links.

    This is a generic problem with Google's free services. Spammers and scammers now use GMail to get throwaway mail accounts, Blogger for an open redirector, YouTube to host advertising videos, AdWords to advertise scams, and Google Checkout to collect the money. It's full-service evil.

    For the last two, Google has a business relationship, but doesn't seem to be validating their customers well enough. The use of Google Checkout for spam and attack tools is especially disturbing. Try, for example, searching for "craiglist posting". Note the ads with Google Checkout links. There, Google is an active participant in collecting the money and is profiting from the transaction.

    1. Re:Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by D+Ninja · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's full-service evil.

      If you mean Google is a full-service evil, I have to disagree.

      People who exploit the services are "evil." Google is not evil for providing very excellent services. It's the same arguments with respect to guns - who do you blame? The gun manufacturer, or the guy who shot the gun?

    2. Re:Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is shocking! Google checkout selling adbomber... i bet PayPal would never do such a thing..

    3. Re:Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this all the time. I have several "Google alerts" setup with very specific keywords all of which contain very uniquely named city I live in.

      I 2-5 get false alarm alerts every day that have a blogspot or blogger address that either has spam directly on the blog or redirects as you describe. I was reporting these blogs, but after several weeks I've just given up. If I see a blogger or blogspot URL in the Google Alert I just delete it.

      Google needs to make it hard, not just harder, but hard to create an account on blogger or blogspot. You need to provide real proof you are a human and some how they need to figure out a way for you to prove you are not using it for nefarious reasons.

      Google also needs to do a better time of patrolling the content. I've seen so many spam posts that they really do need to invest some time into spam filtering, not just user comments, but the actual posts.

    4. Re:Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is evil because they don't give a f. I mean, they are so great at automatically detecting stuff, but garbage in their own backyard they somehow prefer to ignore.

    5. Re:Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course Google doesn't give a f. You find a company that size that does give a f. Google gives just enough of a f to avoid lawsuits and bad press, just like any other big company.
       
      And you CAN swear on the internet, by the way.

    6. Re:Blogspot is popular for spam redirects by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Isn't there some equivalent of Godwin's law for people who randomly introduce gun control into threads?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  15. And the rest..... by vigour · · Score: 4, Funny

    The other 98% comes from here

    1. Re:And the rest..... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The other 98% comes from here

      That's an interesting question. How much of the world's malware is hosted on (and by hosted i mean stored in, not just linked from) end-user Windows PC's, how much of it on Windows servers, and how much on Linux computers? Is there any statistics about that?

    2. Re:And the rest..... by Rapidity · · Score: 1

      Except they advertise it as operating systems. (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

  16. The best part . . . by greenreaper · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're subscribed to Google Alerts, and they post a malware-hosting blogger site with material you're watching for, it comes straight into your inbox. I've had this happen to me with spam copied from one of my own wikis. They seriously need to clamp down on the ability to redirect people automatically from Blogger.

    1. Re:The best part . . . by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      I've had this happen to me with spam copied from one of my own wikis.

      Well that's easy enough to fix, just stop posting spam on your own wikis!

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  17. yahoo email? by thermian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of the time the scam mail I get has a yahoo email attached.
    There are no innocents among free web service providers.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  18. Popular blog site has some malware by wattrlz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Podcast at 11.

  19. $10... by Tpl2000 · · Score: 1

    $10 USD says 75% is hosted by microsoft, and the rest is hosted by people trying to sell v1agra.

    --
    Epic. Just epic.
    1. Re:$10... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      $10 USD says 75% is hosted by microsoft

      Bah,

      American Dollars, at least wager with a currency that's worth something, like Jamaican Dollars or Indonesian Rupiah.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  20. Hypocrisy by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful
    On two occasions miscreants managed to inject links to malware into my site, and on each occasion Google nearly immediately started listing my site in search results as "this site may harm your computer", and no direct (clickable) link.

    If Blogger is so full of malware or links to malware, why don't all the search results pointing to Blogger get the same warning and lack of link?

    1. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they look at each URL as unique. So it's not *.blogger.com has junk so blogger.com is bad, it's yoursite.blogger.com has junk so yoursite.blogger.com is bad, but othersite.blogger.com is still good.

      If you have the Netcraft toolbar installed you'll see a "risk rating" visiting different sites including any sub-domain under blogger.com. Each and every blog is considered a unique site with it's own "risk" or "reputation" or what ever you want to call it.

  21. Way to go, PC Pro by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sophos says:

    Blogger accounts for around 2% of malware," according to Sophos's senior technology consultant..
    ..
    Sophos says it doesn't blame Google for the situation...

    PC Pro's crack writers say:

    Google's Blogger service is responsible for 2% of the world's malware hosted on the web

    (Emphasis mine.) Journalism at its finest!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Way to go, PC Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, bb. PC Pro follows the edict to hate the service bu love the service provider.

  22. Market share by Haxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

        I'm curious to what the 2% number means when market share and region figures are factored in. I'll bet it doesn't mean much.

    Newsflash! 2% of the Internet is where 2% of the hackers are!

    1. Re:Market share by Darkk · · Score: 1

      Only 2%?

      Man, the other 98% of the hackers are slackin!!

  23. Nigerian prince's blog by Digestromath · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank you for coming to my blog. I'm a Nigerian prince, and I'm seeking help freeing my millions of dollars from a frozen account. With all your help, I can slowly free my fortune, and give you a pretty fair share, tax free of course. See my latest post for the progress we've made! We're almost to my goal of freeing one millions dollars! Also my cat just turned 2 today, see my pictures for the awesome birthday party pics.

  24. Ads? by dedazo · · Score: 1

    What are these "ads" you talk about? I can see nothing but search results in thar page.

    (hugs CustomizeGoogle)

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  25. I blame the people who make guns easily available by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thats a poor argument. Take canada vs. usa - the climate is the same, most of the laws are similar... but gun control laws are drastically different, and canada has better social services.

    ... but canada also has a much MUCH lower incidence of gun-related crime.

    do we blame the lack of social services in the states for the gun crime? Or perhaps the availability of the guns?

  26. Blacklisted ? by Joebert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On a serious note, I hope Google gets a handle on this situation before my blogspot blog becomes an innocent bystander on blacklists.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  27. LOLWORMZ by longacre · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness icanhascheezburger runs on WordPress.

    1. Re:LOLWORMZ by EveLibertine · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm still pretty sure that counts as malware.

  28. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I love how the parent gets modded redundant :)

  29. Microsoft blogging service by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft isn't set to invent blogging until 2011, after including it as a LiveCloud application in Windows 7. By 3Q2011 you are all expected to offer some awed respect to the brilliant innovation of user generated content (patent pending). Guidance is the same for all of their products: stay away from version 1, even numbered and prime numbered versions, and every version before the first service pack.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Microsoft blogging service by jgarra23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft isn't set to invent blogging until 2011, after including it as a LiveCloud application in Windows 7. By 3Q2011
      Don't forget that you will have the following versions:

      MS Blog Starter (x32 only)
      MS Blog Basic (x32 only)
      MS Blog Home (x32 only)
      MS Blog Home Premium (x32 and x64 editions available)
      MS Blog Business (x32 and x64 editions available)
      MS Blog Business Premium (x32 and x64 editions available)
      MS Blog Pro (x32 and x64 editions available)
      MS Blog Ultimate (x32 and x64 editions available)*

      * denotes extra (MS Blog Extras!) features and functionality that you will be able to download at a later TBD date!

  30. It's only the best malware by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    When asked about their malware, Google is reported to have said "But, it's only the best malware."

    Then the dormouse fell asleep in the open source coding pot.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  31. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by Nightspirit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Canada also has much lower immigration. You must either have a job that is in great demand, post-graduate education, or able to put down 400k to start a business. Meanwhile here in AZ we have so many people illegally crossing the border that we had to pass laws that make employers verify citizenship before they can be given job, or they lose their business license.

  32. Sigh Blogger by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    I started a blog three months ago on Blogger and two days after my blog was created, Blogger's spam detecting software marked my benign text only blog as a "spam blog" and locked me out for a week after promising to restore access in 4 days if I responded to their email.

    After 4 days, I went with Wordpress and Bluehost (needed other services like gallery as well). Blogger was promising when it first came out but Google doesn't work enough on Blogger (being free and all). Also the "Flag" feature exists so you can flag blogs for offensive/spam content but I am not sure if that makes a difference.

    I commend Google for providing Blogger free of charge (although this is from Google buying Pyra more than 5 years ago) and allowing people to make money from Adsense but the feature set leaves a lot to be desired. To be fair, they have introduced a few features in the last 2-3 months but I love Wordpress now.

    1. Re:Sigh Blogger by value_added · · Score: 1

      I started a blog three months ago on Blogger and two days after my blog was created, Blogger's spam detecting software marked my benign text only blog as a "spam blog" and locked me out for a week ...

      By chance, were you blogging about Nigerian genealogies, luxury watches, or herbal supplements?

    2. Re:Sigh Blogger by atari2600 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The blog was actually about American stupidity.

    3. Re:Sigh Blogger by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Also the "Flag" feature exists so you can flag blogs for offensive/spam content but I am not sure if that makes a difference.

      Some idiot recently created a blogger account (with intentions to make free money from the sponsored links, I guess) and for content he joined a subscription-only mailing list for epilepsy and set it up to autopost from there. Now you search for anyone's name who's ever written to that list in the past few months and you see bits of their personal medical information sprayed all over the Google results. Lots of people have been flagging the blog and trying to contact someone at Blogspot or Google but it's like talking to a wall; in the meantime everyone is leaving that list in a hurry.

      To be charitable, I suspect blogs get flagged left and right all the time, so the flags that they'd want to find are just lost in all the bullshit. Flagging is a low-grade source of this type of information. All it takes to flag a blog is one click.

  33. help for twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you're trying to bash Microsoft!
      Would you like me to:

       o Show you how to use dollar signs to be cool

       o Help you come up with a dumb conspiracy
         theory that involves Steve Ballmer and
         farm animals

       o Play "Give Us the Source" by RMS while
         you crapflood Slashdot

       o Recompile the kernel again
    _____
    /     \
    |-   -|
      0   0
    | |   |
    | |   |
    | |   |
    | \___/
    \______/

  34. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Take canada vs. usa - the climate is the same

          Are you NUTS? Yes the climate in the border area of North Dakota is the same as the border area of Manitoba... however if you want to compare Florida's climate to Yellowknife's, I wish you luck.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  35. 2% Implies a known boundry by jasonmanley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In order to determine that it is 2% means that they would have to know exactly how much is out there in the first place - how would they know that?

    --
    http://projectleader.wordpress.com
    1. Re:2% Implies a known boundry by thedistrict · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a good point and with the ceiling for malware constantly expanding, the percentage would change. That is, unless Google is acquiring the same percentage of malware that is coming out in perpetuity. So for all the new malware that comes out every second, Google gets 2%of it.. I can't imagine that's possible, so it seems like most of the malware is probably other places. The only scary part is that there's so much malware out there that 2% represents a pretty significant number of viruses.

    2. Re:2% Implies a known boundry by dkf · · Score: 1

      In order to determine that it is 2% means that they would have to know exactly how much is out there in the first place - how would they know that?

      There are statistical techniques they can use that were originally developed for working out how many members of an endangered species are in an area. The issue with endangered species is that not only are there not that many of the animals about, but they move around as well. So what you do is capture and tag a few, and come back later on and repeat, noting how many you catch twice. Repeat a few times and you can have a pretty good guess at how many are out there.

      I bet that sort of thing could be adapted to this stuff without too much trouble.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:2% Implies a known boundry by m50d · · Score: 1

      No, they took a random sample of malware, and found that 2% of it was on blogger, and performed a perfectly valid statistical extrapolation. You're looking at it from the wrong angle; they didn't go and count up all the malware on blogger and say "ooh, this sounds like about 2% to me"

      --
      I am trolling
  36. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by Bearpaw · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but canada also has a much MUCH lower incidence of gun-related crime.

    do we blame the lack of social services in the states for the gun crime? Or perhaps the availability of the guns?

    Neither. It's Clinton's fault.

  37. That just sucks! by motang · · Score: 1

    Well there goes the neighborhood!

  38. redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the chair throw should be the original post, its how ballmer starts every meeting!

  39. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    oh wait, you're right... also, lets compare Juneau (alaska) to Victoria (Vancouver)... oh I guess you're not THAT right.

  40. Not meaningful by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    Even if you can show that Linux computers account for a disproportionately small amount of malware, that doesn't necessarily show that Linux is more secure (not that I think it isn't).

    Linux computers are mostly run by technically-minded people, who probably take better security measures anyway. Not to mention that Linux is a a smaller target for malware.

  41. Join the TNAA today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Do you hate twitter? Do you loath Slashdot? Are you a total fuckwad? Then join the Twitter Negation Association of America (TNAA) and help ruin Slashdot. How does it work? Easy:

    • Accuse everone of being twitter. Did they say "M$" or "Windoze"? It's gotta be twitter.
    • Sign up lots of accounts to accuse twitter of the same. Hypocrisy? No, Genius! Be sure to mod up anything derogatory and genreally midless.
    • Be an ass. This should come naturally.

    The point is to increase noise to signal ratios. Join today!

    Brought to you by the MSFT.

    1. Re:Join the TNAA today! by Macthorpe · · Score: 0, Troll

      No thanks - I'm pretty sure twitter is capable of ruining Slashdot all on his own.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  42. But this is Google, so.. by zeptobyte · · Score: 1

    It's only relevant and targeted malware.

  43. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 1

    Victoria (British Columbia)

    Fixed

    --
    I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
  44. I contracted W32.spybot by DrewBenstein · · Score: 1

    ...and it was named as googlestubinst.exe !! Symantec Corp stopped it though.

  45. Just use linux or bsd for porn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL keep WiNdOwS at home where it is safe.

  46. Blogger also generates DoS attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Blogger shows by default ALL entries ever published within a blog in one page, by merely surfing the web you can accidentally enter in the orbit of a mammoth blog (+5Mb frontpage), that not only takes ages to load, but also freezes firefox (and the rest of the computer) until it has finished loading the page. Damn you Blogger!!!

  47. i haz funneys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... how's this whole thing working out for you?

  48. The "host" is Windows 99.9 percent of the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "host" is Windows 99.9 percent of the time.
    Google blogger is a carrier 2% of the time.
    I imagine infected Windows hosts are the source of viruses > 50% of the time.

  49. Re:A warning... If this keeps up, we'll need by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    $2 billion notes, like in Zimbabwe... with 2.2 billion percent per month inflation .... enough to buy a couple of bus rides...

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/02/01/zimbabwe.inflation.ap/index.html

    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g2RPSaqbbqphRrvYYIaUsAV27LZwD91VM5O00

    But, the REAL $64 BILLION question: How much malware is on MSN? Why worry about Google if it's only got 2% of the malware???

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  50. What sort of ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > and serve ads to it

    What kind of ads go well with malware?

    * Best deals on 'getting pwn3d' [ebay.com]
    * Credit carding kits from $100 [phish.com]
    * Discover the Windows Genuine Advantage! [microsoft.com]
    * Enlarge your membership today! [blackseo.com]

  51. Not the most exploited site by Kurrel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd like to see what percentage of infections were facilitated through MySpace, but that would require omniscience just as this figure does.

  52. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, those mean Canadians not helping the poor, oppressed and disadvantaged Mexicans. Here in the US we welcome those poor, oppressed and disadvantaged folks with open arms. As you can tell from the way laws are enforced.

    Of course, we are all in danger of becoming equally poor, oppressed and disadvantaged by allowing anyone and everyone to come here.

  53. Targets by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Google's Blogger service is responsible for 2% of the world's malware

    .

    Microsoft is responsible for nearly 100% of the malware targets.

    The root problem is the producers of malware, not the conduits that are used.

  54. unbelievable by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

    Google Blogger "Hosts 2% of World's Malware" That guy surely is one sly dog

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
  55. Blogger is a real christian by Kirovsk · · Score: 1

    Blogger is a real christian - gives bread and house for all people, kind and evil...

  56. Malware, what's that ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 0

    Pics plz.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  57. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    As you can tell from the way laws are not enforced.

    There, fixed it for you.

    Part of the problem is that laws have *not* been enforced. If they had been, and if we had more sensible visa policies in the US (allowing more legal seasonal workers), then illegal immigration wouldn't be the problem it is.

  58. Re:M$ Sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter hosts 100% of Slashdot's malware.
    --
    You can be twitter too!

  59. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Yes, take a single state with a population of around 600k and call it "The USA".

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  60. Re:I blame the people who make guns easily availab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. After all, it made world-wide news after he 'shot' a woman in the face, and mostly got away with it except for temporarily losing his law license.