Slashdot Mirror


Ultra-Light Micro Air Vehicles

Roland Piquepaille writes "Dutch engineers have built the third generation of the DelFly autonomous air vehicle. The DelFly Micro made its first public flight earlier today in Delft. This micro air vehicle weighs only 3 grams and has a wingspan of 10 centimeters. This very small remote-controlled aircraft carries a 0.4 gram camera. The DelFly Micro, which looks like a dragonfly, can fly for 3 minutes at a maximum speed of 5 meters/second. It could be used for observation flights in difficult-to-reach or dangerous areas."

19 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by UncleWilly · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'd still notice this in the girl's shower.

    1. Re:I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know this sounds incredible, but it's actually possible to be in a shower with a girl in person without the aid of technology.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Roofies are technology.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know this sounds incredible, but it's actually possible to be in a shower with a girl in person without the aid of technology.

      If you're just naturally invisible? If you're both plumbers? C'mon, tell us how! Slashdot wants to know.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by Ngarrang · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know this sounds incredible, but it's actually possible to be in a shower with a girl in person without the aid of technology.

      You must be new here.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    5. Re:I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're both dirty?

    6. Re:I'll wait for the Fourth Generation by laejoh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  2. Fetch me my flyswatter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll show this thing a dangerous area.

  3. Re:Video link: by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, they win. I was going to moan about the refresh on the camera being inadequate, the flight time being useless, and the inability to hover meaning that it has two modes: flying, and crashing.

    But having seen in action? Must... own... tiny... whirring... affront to God. Must.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. Now, if they.... by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 0, Funny

    .. equipped this thing with a small weapon, it would:

    "Fly like a Butteryfly, Sting like a Bee".

    --
    ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
  5. Re:What happens... by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    In an issue of Meat & Poultry magazine, editors quoted from "Feathers," the publication of the California Poultry Industry Federation, telling the following story:

    The US Federal Aviation Administration has a unique device for testing the strength of windshields on airplanes. The device is a gun that launches a dead chicken at a plane's windshield at approximately the speed the plane flies.

    The theory is that if the windshield doesn't crack from the carcass impact, it'll survive a real collision with a bird during flight.

    It seems the British were very interested in this and wanted to test a windshield on a brand new, speedy locomotive they're developing.

    They borrowed FAA's chicken launcher, loaded the chicken and fired.

    The ballistic chicken shattered the windshield, broke the engineer's chair and embedded itself in the back wall of the engine's cab. The British were stunned and asked the FAA to recheck the test to see if everything was done correctly.

    The FAA reviewed the test thoroughly and had one recommendation:

    "Use a thawed chicken."

    --
    I hate printers.
  6. Re:What happens... by dimension6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hm...I don't think they'll survive easily if they get sucked into a jet engine. They're kind of small and don't look that durable.

  7. Re:Video link: by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny

    What I wanna know is: does it fly ok in, ahem, rainy or otherwise humid conditions?

  8. Re:Air-to-Air missles? by florescent_beige · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nooo it won't have Sidewinders, it will have a Stinger.

    See cuz it's small.

    Small right? Like a...

    Bug...

    Annnnnd...

    <spontaneously implodes>

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  9. Re:3 minutes? by el_coyotexdk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cluster meet flamethrower... Flamethrower meet cluster!

  10. Re:3 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    3 minutes is not very useful. By the time you reach your destination and actually get some good images, you've run out of time to return and have effectively lost your ...

    Ahem. That's what she said.

  11. Re:Video link: by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Funny

    You may also want to check if the reflective surface of bathroom tiles mess with its navigation or imaging in any way.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  12. Re:What happens... by florescent_beige · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mythbusters used the wrong kind of airframe for testing. It does make a big difference. The flimsy little unpressurized airplane they used was going to break no matter what they fired at it. They did a re-do of that test and concluded frozen was worse.

    Part-23 aircraft (little airplanes) have to withstand a 2-lb bird hitting the windscreen at max flap speed. Part-25 aircraft (airliners) have to withstand an 8-lb bird hitting the empennage at cruse speed and a 4-lb bird hitting anywhere else including the wind screen at cruise speed. There is a whole aviation sub-industry devoted to testing and designing for bird impact.

    In real life using a frozen chicken is a mistake nobody would ever make. I say this because in the bird impact business it is well known that bird density, a more subtle effect than frozen/thawed, is important. Chickens are more dense than flying birds and create higher peak impact transients. Chicken guns don't fire chickens any more, they fire freshly killed ducks or geese.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  13. Re:3 minutes? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    3 minutes is not very useful. By the time you reach your destination and actually get some good images,

    Some slashdotters may be quicker on the trigger than you.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne