Slashdot Mirror


Leaked Wolverine Origin Trailer Makes the Rounds

Uriah noted that the Comic Con wolverine origins trailer has been circulating in high quality camcorder form, very conveniently broken into a first and second part. Despite the terrible camera angle, the movie looks pretty good ... at least, while we wait for the Avengers.

22 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Leaked trailers by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gee, I wonder how all these trailers are being "leaked" all of a sudden... are management types finally clued into the power of internet buzz?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Leaked trailers by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember in the web's infancy that if you had a fan page, you got a cease and desist, even though you clearly weren't breaking any laws. Companies attacked their fans, rather than rewarding them for adding to the hype machine and giving them free PR.

      Oh, and the trailer (what I could make out of it) looks pretty damned good.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Leaked trailers by Exanon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be great if it was an intentional leak and the press found out about it. When an indie artist does it I don't mind, but when a big movie studio and supporter of MPAA does it... well. You see the juicy scoop right there.

    3. Re:Leaked trailers by gnick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I recall watching a "leaked" copy of The Devil's Rejects (it may have been House of 1000 Corpses, but I'm 75% sure it was Rejects). It was obviously a well-placed tripod at a private screening (nice theater, small screen relative to multiplexes) - Crystal clear audio. The interesting thing was that, at the very start, there was some ass-hole with a cowboy hat blocking part of the screen. He stood up during the opening credits and walked out of the theater. I don't know for certain that it was Rob Zombie, but it sure as hell looked like him when you caught his profile.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. So... by geogob · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess they didn't manage to delay the cam release 38 hours. Expect box office failure... unless the movie is any good (but that doesn't count).

  3. Seriously? by gazbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A story about a leaked fucking trailer?

    1. Re:Seriously? by spyrochaete · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I come to Slashdot for tech news, not for a sneak peak at the TV commercials of tomorrow.

    2. Re:Seriously? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't like it? Vote it down.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  4. Re:Low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Much as I dislike the whole heavy handed **AA nonsense,
    people who sneak camcorders into theatres are just low.

    They're not low. They usually sit back a bit to get a better angle.

  5. Re:ahhh by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do you figure that?

    Because he was "cool." And Marvel figured out that all they had to do was put him on the cover of a comic book it would sell. And if you made 3 different versions of the cover, people would buy all three. So then they figured they needed more Wolverine-like characters to sell more comics, so they started making them, and they tended to suck. Then they started letting the comics artists become celebrities, at which point they started to demand their own series. And most of them couldn't write. It was kind of a chain reaction thing.

  6. Re:Camcorder jammer? by wild_quinine · · Score: 5, Funny

    I shudder to think what would happen if the MPAA hooked up with the Army.

    Major public works would get busted down to private.

  7. Re:Camcorder jammer? by alta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think the chip would be necessary. I'd bet you could really distort the quality of what it records by putting some light that blasts out a wavelength just outside of what's visible to us, but the camcorder is flooded by it.

    This seems too easy, probably would have been done already.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  8. Re:Camcorder jammer? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could, and the military has a large body of research on this (related to jamming security cameras). Part of the problem is that you need to use a laser, and people might get upset when (not if) your laser hits their eyes. An IR laser might do it, but that will still be detrimental to a person's movie viewing experience (and I don't know what a class IIIa IR laser would do to a retina anyway).

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  9. Re:Doesn't look too great... by Grey_14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you want a wolverine movie... that isn't just a bunch of violence?

    Do you know who wolverine is? Have you ever seen any media with the character before?

    "I'm the best there is at what I do, and what I do ain't very nice."

  10. Why is The Blob and Gambit in this? by Daswolfen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is what I hate generally hate about comic book movies (and this applies to all movies made from print media sources). I understand that you have to make some changes because you are dealing with years of back story and have squeeze it into 2 hours.

    But that said, would it kill them to at least keep the story straight rather than add characters who had nothing to do with the Weapon X program? Blob and Gambit had NOTHING to do with the weapon x program (not even in any sort of retcon'ed timeline). Where is Maverick, Mastadon and Kestrel? They are not listed on IMDB on the cast list (but Blob, Gambit, Deadpool and gent Zero (the latter two were involved in later incarnations of the Weapon X program, not Wolverine's origin).

    So maybe I am being a picky fan boy, and the movie does look awesome, but would it kill them to get it right for once?

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  11. Re:ahhh by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eh... Wolvie had been doing his thing since the 70s. It's not like he was forgotten about until the 90s, he was already an extremely popular Marvel character.

    No. Wolverine didn't ruin comics in the 90s. Comics in the 90s ruined themselves.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  12. Re:Public Library, check out DVDs for FREE!! by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not paying to see a movie in public, not with the assholes. I'm not paying to rent it, either.

    Too many assholes at home?

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  13. Re:I wonder.... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can /. think of anyone who would be better suited to the role?

    Me. My sideburns are at least 4 inches longer than Hugh Jackmans.

    Funny, found out recently, when I interviewed for this position, my manager emailed the whole office to tell them that Wolverine was in the office applying for a job. I remember wondering at the time why everyone was looking my way...

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  14. Good old blood and guts or flower power? by sxmjmae · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could be good. They have always tending to 'soften' wolverine down with each new incarnation of his character. At the starting comics he was a whirl wind of claws that would literally spew blood and guts of 50 ninjas all over the pages. Everything a young impressionable adolescent was eager to treat his eyes to. Imagine wolverine power of regeneration what a real person would do... wolverine did it... smoked, fought, got shot, had a good time with out a concern for his personnel safety, and to top it off he killed nasty ninjas and bad guys (all things any kid would imagine doing if he had his power). Then they 'soften' him and started to add dialogue, taking valuable blood soaked page space for a text bubble. As long the movie does not have him picking daisies with Sabretooth and calming talking things out it might actually be OK.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
  15. Comics can't keep their stories straight... by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comics can't keep their stories straight... so why bother doing so for TV/Film/cartoon*/etc. adaptations - especially given the constraints of the movie format, etc.?

    * though the X-Men cartoon was quite nice, I don't think one could actually call it 'canon'.

    From alternative universes to timetravel to cross-overs** to introducing new characters that are -exactly- like a previously existing (and sometimes not even dead-yet) character for the sake of furthering along a particular plot.

    ** I'm sorry, but why would spiderman be fighting superman, exactly - and just how would superman not actually be winning this? Please. Leave each superhero in its own little 'universe' already. (Yeah, I'm looking at you, Stark.)

    If you want at least a reasonably solid storyline with a beginning and an end, then comic books are one of the last places you should be looking. With Heroes being popular as it is and having a high 'X-Men'-appeal itself, I can't help but fear that it, too, will end up being dragged on and on and on.

    Back on-topic.. Gambit is a hugely popular character from the comics as well as the cartoons... fans have wanted to see Gambit in the first three X-Men movies and were denied it; I'm not saying the movie studios are bending to the will of the fans, but you can't exactly blame them if they did - even if it's just because of dollarsigns in their eyes :)

  16. Re:Camcorder jammer? by m.ducharme · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my former life selling electronics, we used the camcorders to see if the infrared on a defective tv remote was working.

    --
    Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  17. Re:ahhh by Mercano · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmm. Itersting bug in /.. Hit the preview button, type some more into the textbox while the preview loads. The text won't show up in the preview, but it will in the post.dsafsdaf

    --
    #include <signature.h>