Slashdot Mirror
Spore Almost Ready for Production, Complete With "Sporn"
It seems that there has been some backlash over questionable creature creation with the Spore creation tool. Some of this content has been cleverly and obviously nicknamed 'Sporn'. For better or worse, Spore's Producer Thomas Vu is saying the long-awaited game should be ready for production in about a week, keeping it on track for the announced September 7th release.
If there is not sporn of it, someone will design sporn of it.
Did they pull the phone-home copy protection or not?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
And... has there been any announcement in changes to DRM?
I'll gladly give them my $50 if I get a game that'll stay a game.
But when the single player aspects of a game will only work as long as the DRM servers are kept up... well... $50 for something that turns into a plastic coaster whenever EA wants seems just a tad excessive.
You know that after this launches and little Johnny visits his friends planet with giant penii walking around and his Mom and Dad see it there is going to be a meltdown in the parent sector. I think if GTA San Andreas proves anything, it's fine for our children to shoot cops all day long and beat up hookers, but as soon as they get a glimpse of something sexual the parents' heads start spinning a la the Exorcist.
Ctrl-Alt-Del put it very well.
Test your net with Netalyzr
http://www.buzzfeed.com/scott/spore-porn
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=191255
I find this one particularly amusing in its simplicity:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnUXnnH6sY0
One Spore fan told CNN: I consider this very similar to child pornography, at least to the extent of distributing the material to children.
Child pornography: This isn't it.
Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
Violence is easier to teach as right and wrong, you get hit it hurts, so you know that if you hit someone else it hurts thus henceforth there is a direct cause the wrongness of violence. Sex if abused takes time before truly understanding the consequences, as the act feels good for both parties, issues of psychological attachment issues, teenage parents, economic problems, medical problems, and other risks. Makes it far more difficult to teach, responsibility, as all the effects are what ifs and could happen and protection offers better chances but not 100%.... All very difficult for stupid kids/teens to comprehend. As well American culture isn't properly designed to deal with these issues so when there is a teen pregnancy it is treated as a problem of society.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Screwed up? Yep, we've got lotsa that, all right.
I recall reading, several years ago, an interview that the head of Britain's film censorship board gave on the occasion of his retirement (i.e, now that he was able to speak his mind freely without contradicting policies he was required to uphold). Basically, he said that he thought that, as regards media depictions, that sex was a fine and healthy thing for society, while violence wasn't. He thought that Britain (and societies in general) would do well to be less concerned with censoring sexual content, and more concerned with violent content.
Now, while I thoroughly enjoy playing CS with a group of fellow forty-somethings who understand that IT'S JUST A GAME, I must say that I agree with that fellow's opinion. (I don't really know how to reconcile the inherent conflict here, BTW. )
"My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."