Slashdot Mirror


The DIY Dialysis Machine

Millie Kelly was born with a condition that required an immediate operation. During this operation her kidneys started to fail and since she was too small for dialysis machines, doctors told her parents that she was unlikely to live. Luckily for Millie, Dr. Malcolm Coulthard and a colleague tried to build a much smaller kidney machine on their own and they were successful. Her mother said, "It was a green metal box with a few paint marks on it with quite a few wires coming out of it into my daughter - it didn't look like a normal NHS one." The girl was hooked up to the machine over a seven day period to allow her kidneys to recover. Two years later, her mother Rebecca says she is "fit as a fiddle." You should see what Dr. Coulthard can build using a postage stamp, a tuning fork, a lawn chair and a jellyfish.

17 of 476 comments (clear)

  1. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't put pictures with stories unless you're going to take being a news organization seriously, with you know, editing and responsibility.

    1. Re:WTF? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but ever since Digg came along, I've had to say "get off my lawn" quite a bit less. All jokes aside, maybe we're better off without the people that would leave Slashdot for Digg. Nothing against Digg users, but the two sites are just geared at completely different audiences.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  2. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sadly, this would have never happened in the US. The malpractice liability would be too great.

    1. Re:Wow by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In theory, there would be no standing to sue under the good samaritan laws.

      Except for the fact that they are being paid to provide care, which means that the Good Samaritan laws don't apply.

      See Wikipedia: "As a result, medical professionals are typically not protected by Good Samaritan laws when performing first aid in connection with their employment."

      I still think they would be able to get away with it given the proper contracts, otherwise you wouldn't see other "last ditch" attempts.

    2. Re:Wow by UdoKeir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We had tort reform for just such a thing here in Texas. Neither my insurance premiums nor healthcare costs have been reduced.

  3. Oh come on... by snl2587 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is the picture really worth a thousand words? I think the summary is more than enough.

  4. Show us the machine! by vecctor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The picture of the patient is nice and all but the interesting part is the machine, right? I'd like a clear picture of that instead ...

    --
    Why, yes I have been touched by His noodly appendage. And I plan to sue.
  5. STFU by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have mod points, but I would rather say something.

    That is a beautiful woman with a happy, healthy child child. Get out of your make-believe Hollywood world and into the real one. I for one, saw the picture and thought it was sweet.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:STFU by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sweet or not, judging from the replies already here I'd say that if Slashdot starts posting photographs with each story the site will turn into half Flickbookbucket and half /b/ in short order.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  6. Ugly guys shouldn't comment on appearance by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hate to feed the trolls here.

    Hate to break it to you but YOU are a troll.

    But if you're going to post a picture, at least have it be of an medium attractive woman.

    I always find it amazing that guys who are rather hideous themselves (Howard Stern I'm looking at you) seem to feel it is their job to criticize the appearance of women. It's especially comical here on a website devoted to nerd news where most of the readership wouldn't have any idea how to please a woman. Here's a clue - no one cares what your ugly ass thinks of someone else's appearance. If you feel the need to criticize you had better be a model yourself. Given that you are posting here on Slashdot that's pretty unlikely - so kindly shut the hell up.

    1. Re:Ugly guys shouldn't comment on appearance by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i had some pretty awful pizza last night but since i'm not a chef I can't really say anything about it.

      Sure you can because the chef can do something about how he cooks. Bad cooking can be a mistake and can be corrected. But if you call someone ugly in public because they didn't win the genetic lottery THEN you are just an ass.

  7. Re:A painful noisy chair in the mail? by Otto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not only was the summary bad, TFA was bad as well. Why couldn't a conventional dialysis machine be used? It doesn't say.

    Is there a doctor in the house?

    Probably not enough blood in the patient.

    Using a dialysis machine means taking a fair amount of blood out of the body, running it through a bunch of tubes, and putting it back.

    This effectively adds a lot of extra volume to the blood system as a whole. Adults can spare some without effect, but children and babies are much smaller, and so you have to have a much smaller device which doesn't have as much volume in it.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  8. Re:too big? by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your electrical analogy is as good as any slashdot analogy. It would, however, make a lot more sense if you swapped thicker/thinner, since that is how resistance works.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  9. Get a grip people by msoori · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a great story and its sad how people are making rude comments about the mom. If you had a dying child, you were helpless and couldn't do anything to help save the child, you'd be like that too. So, please be a bit more sensitive about others. Regardless, this is something that can save the life of these insensitive people's children too if needed (if they are able to reproduce in the first place!) Give the guy some credit doing the best as a doctor to save a life.

  10. Re:For that matter... by GameMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's going to our emergency rooms. All the people without decent health insurance are forced to rely on emergency room care for medical issues that could be handled, at a vastly lower cost, by a general practitioner. Also, they tend to let what start out as minor medical issues progress far longer because they can't afford to get them treated until an emergency room would deem it bad enough to deal with. That's the hidden reason why socialized healthcare ends up saving money overall, you get to take advantage of preventative medicine and catch issues early before the cost to treat them skyrockets.

    --

    Rules of Conduct:
    #1 - The DM is always right.
    #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  11. EMTALA by raygundan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're absolutely right. EMTALA essentially created universal healthcare in the US by making it illegal for an emergency room to refuse to treat someone based on their ability to pay. This is (in my opinion) a worthwhile goal, but one which is terribly inefficient with health-care money if not backed by a socialized healthcare system at the same time.

    If you've got no healthcare, but get sick, you can roll into the ER for free treatment. Of course, ER care is an order of magnitude more costly than care from a family doctor, and does not include checkups, history, or preventative care that could have avoided the issue in the first place. It also requires that you wait until your condition is far enough gone that it constitutes an emergency, likely making things more difficult and expensive to treat.

    So we pay for healthcare for everybody, except we do it as inefficiently as possible, tying up ER doctors, nurses and facilities with things that should have been taken care of at a tenth the cost elsewhere, earlier, and without occupying a bed somewhere at a facility designed for broken bones and heart attacks, not festering infections you should have had cleaned up a year ago.

  12. Re:Well, maybe, but by 19061969 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Problem is you're in England. You're stuck with socialized health care."

    First, it's the United Kingdom, not England. Second, a national health service is not "socialised medicine". Socialised medicine is just perjorative spin used by heavy investors in healthcare to ensure that their profits remain uninterrupted. What the NHS is, is a national health service funded by tax contributions. Roads in the US are paid for by taxes. Does this mean you have a "socialised transport network"? Third, if you don't want to use the NHS, you can go private and be seen immediately, in the UK. There are plenty of private healthcare facilities along with various plans, insurance policies etc. Fourthly, the NHS appears to deliver higher quality treatment for a lower cost than in the US and for many conditions (eg, cancer) there is no waiting. Still, who cares about the health of a nation when shareholder value is booming? There is also no wrangling with insurance companies or having to remortgage your house or borrow vast amounts of money with little realistic hope of paying it back.

    Having lived in countries with both a NHS and with entirely private healthcare, I can say from sore personal experience that I would take the NHS every time.

    --
    bang goes my karma... again...