Slashdot Mirror


MediaSentry Hired By People's Republic of China

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "MediaSentry, now called 'SafeNet,' the RIAA's illegal, unlicensed investigator of choice, has been hired by the People's Republic of China to provide DRM for the Olympics coverage. The PRC says it 'owns exclusive rights to the broadcast of all audio and video content via online and mobile distribution channels across Mainland China' and wants to protect it from 'piracy.' I wonder if the Chinese government is aware of MediaSentry's track record — i.e. all the good things it has accomplished so far for the Big 4 record companies."

58 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. a match made in heaven . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I wonder if the Chinese government is aware of MediaSentry's track record

    I wonder if MediaSentry is aware of the Chinese government's track record?

    1. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by negRo_slim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder if the Chinese government is aware of MediaSentry's track record

      I wonder if MediaSentry is aware of the Chinese government's track record?

      Meh. They're perfect bed fellows and we all know it. They both excel at exploiting an ignorant public.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by spyder-implee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wonder why anyone would care? Why would anyone want to Pirate the Olympic broadcasts? Do you have to pay to watch the Olympics in China? Is this more a matter of making sure there is nothing broadcast which might undermine the Chinese government? Say for example an athlete making a speech about human rights after winning a gold medal.

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    3. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they are paid enough, I'm sure they'll causally ignore it.

      A fine example of standard corrupt business finest.

      Just think, now you can use Bittorrent to bypass two evil organizations at the same time!

    4. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would anyone want to Pirate the Olympic broadcasts?

      Spite? Simply to piss off MediaSentry?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you have to pay to watch the Olympics in China?

      I don't know. Didn't we have to pay to watch them here?

      Not as in "pay-per-view", but as in "over broadcast TV"?

      Even if we're talking about actually-free channels (do any still exist?), there's still the matter of ad revenue. If people just put clips up on YouTube, that means Google gets the revenue, instead of the Chinese Government.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    6. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if the Chinese government is aware of MediaSentry's track record

      I wonder if MediaSentry is aware of the Chinese government's track record?

      Meh. They're perfect bed fellows and we all know it. They both excel at exploiting an ignorant public.

      No kidding - I've no need of organizations that exploit an ignorant public like China and MediaSentry. I'm perfectly content with the US government and Apple.

    7. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot Google. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by spyder-implee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Interesting, I assume your in America? Here (Australia) we pay nothing to watch the Olympics & there would be civil outrage if that ever happened.

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    9. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but Channel7 have the 'exclusive' (read: exclusive commercial, as i believe SBS and the ABC will be covering the less popular sports..) rights to the games. Channel9 were rapped over the knuckles by the IOC for filming when they weren't supposed to even be there.

      It's possible this DRM enforcement push is directed against non-endusers, as non-licensed media outlets are also 'without rights' to the material..

      Cue shocked realization from a bunch of media execs.

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
    10. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would anyone want to Pirate the Olympic broadcasts?

      I'll name one. Compare TV coverage in the United States versus a truly free country like Japan. Exclusive broadcast rights truly sucks, big time.

      Are you allowed to change channels if you do not like the particular Olympic event being shown?

    11. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny that you should bring up Adolph Hitler. This is a replay of the 1936 Olympics and I was in Beijing the week before the Olympic commmittee traveled there to choose it - there was an army of people out picking up garbage and what not. I guess they did not have vacuum cleaners large enough to clear out all the dirty[1], polluted air though.

      Indeed, Media Sentry + PRC is a match made in ... well somewhere I'd rather not go.

      [1] On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is the least polluted air and 10 is max polluted, Los Angeles CA USA, where I lived for almost 2 decades ranked about a 5 when I moved away. Tokyo Japan ranked about a 7 when I lived there 2000-2003, and Beijing in 2001 ranked 10. I hope someone does not die in the marathon, but I won't be watching to find out.

    12. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would many people pay to watch the Olympics?

      Probably. If my wife demanded it, I would. I tend to watch the summer Olympics if it is convenient (I'm not much of TV watcher) because it brings back memories of track & field in my school days.

      Of course, after being spoiled by broadcast TV coverage of the Olympics in Tokyo where there was 4 or 5 channels of different events to choose from, I would never ever willingly watch US TV coverage unless they paid me (a lot) to do so.

      When my children get older, I'll probably reverse myself. The Olympics is a great inspiration for young people and I do hope my sons become school boy athletes before they follow in dad's footsteps and become desk jockeys behind a computer.

    13. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Olympics sucks. I wont even bother watching them. The coverage is fucking pathetic. If you are not interested in one of the top billing events, you can forget seeing the event at all. last time around I tried like hell to watch TaeKwonDo to no avail. I could only catch some of it in Canada since I live in Detroit. Otherwise, it was a waste.

      This time I would like to see some mountain biking. My hopes are not high.

      Pay per view Olymipcs. The thought is laughable.

    14. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, Channel 7 (here in Aus) is paying for it from the revenue they raise by selling advertising time.

      The channel is a free-to-air channel, so viewers are definitely not paying for it.

    15. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by dwater · · Score: 2, Informative

      > and Beijing in 2001 ranked 10

      7 years is a *long* time - certainly not recently.

      I lived there from 2003 until 2 months ago. It isn't that bad. Only on occasion does it get bad, and it's not because they generate so much pollution so much as the weather is such that it just stays around; or there's a sand storm blown in from the desert. Still, pollution is pollution.

      I remember the BBC World News showed some pictures of *clear* skies, suggesting it was something unusual. Bollocks - it's often like that and it just depends on the weather.

      > I hope someone does not die in the marathon,

      I hope not too, but it's won't be the first time they've had a marathon there...

      > but I won't be watching to find out.

      I will. It's quite amazing what they've done to make these Olympics possible. I've been to almost every stadium in Beijing and they're all quite excellent. I hear even the BBC complimenting them on the facilities. I'm not *that* much of a sports nut, but there are some events I will be watching for sure.

      Comparisons with 1936 are severely misplaced, IMO.

      --
      Max.
    16. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by dwater · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I wonder if MediaSentry is aware of the Chinese government's track record?

      Like the excellent 'rescue' of the people hit by the recent SiChuan earthquake? That efficiency and scale of that effort puts many countries efforts in similar situations to shame IMO.

      It's not all bad - which is something I have trouble saying about the RIAA, though the comparison in poor taste, IMO.

      --
      Max.
    17. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by spyder-implee · · Score: 3, Funny

      People who don't know how to use the remote.

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    18. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by gnick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't this typical of most current governments?

      I'd love to disagree with you (you're the only foe I've managed to acquire on /. so I guess I just want to nurture the relationship =) ). But I can't - At least not entirely. Governments are a necessary evil - It makes good sense to organize a system of laws/enforcement, public services, national defense, etc. But, once established, it is a constant struggle to keep the government a public service entity instead of a mechanism for oppressing the public in favor of those that have the most influence over the "public representatives".

      Also, I believe that the system in America isn't entirely broken. We have a lot of uninformed people electing bad representatives, but our elections are at worst slightly rigged (too much, but better than many and we're working on it - Even a 1% majority would stifle crooked polling IMHO - Major problem, but the world has no system that's unscammable). The biggest exploitation here is people not bothering to research dodgy information they've been fed and acting on bad pretenses. And, this happens much more on the corporate level than the political level which gives the major corps power to lobby/endorse/bribe the government reps.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    19. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hope someone does not die in the marathon

      All that these marathon men are asking is: Is it safe?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People may view the ads, but they are the product being sold to advertisers by television stations. They have no obligation to buy anything.

      There's a very indirect link that's possible here, but no money moves from a viewer to the IOC here except at the sort of remove where you can link everyone on Earth, via Kevin Bacon, to the IOC.

      ... and please, *never* use the phrase "pray tell."

    21. Re:a match made in heaven . . . by jools33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What pisses me off is the over-patriotic broadcasting of whichever country you're in. If you're in Sweden- they mostly show heats that have Swedish athletes involved - all the other heats are judged uninteresting - and so they prefer to spend their time building up in the studio to the next time when a Swede appears in a heat. As I recall coverage in the UK was similarly biased to UK athletes - perhaps things have changed more recently. If you want to follow the progress of another country other than the one you reside in - you need to pay for Eurosport or something similar. Why cant they just stream the whole thing free on the web so we can choose what we want to watch and when?

  2. Why still 'MediaSentry' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everytime I see this company mentioned on Slashdot, they're still referred to as 'MediaSentry (now SafeNet)'. Why? Is it because the MediaSentry name is still so evocative? Just call them what they are and reference the fact that they are in fact that company that used to be called MediaSentry.

    1. Re:Why still 'MediaSentry' by kcbanner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because changing your name shouldn't rid you of all the shit you threw at various fans. Changing your name after you know you fucked up is kinda a dick move, so they deserve this sort of treatment.

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    2. Re:Why still 'MediaSentry' by Rhapsody+Scarlet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Everytime I see this company mentioned on Slashdot, they're still referred to as 'MediaSentry (now SafeNet)'. Why? Is it because the MediaSentry name is still so evocative?

      It's because the name change is just a cynical attempt to try and get rid of a name that has 'negative connotations' attached to it, like Palladium becoming the Next-Generation Secure Computing Base, or the Security Systems and Standards Certification Act becoming the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act. The new name is just designed to confuse people, so we list it alongside the old name to emphasize to everyone that nothing has changed, SafeNet is MediaSentry.

    3. Re:Why still 'MediaSentry' by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everytime I see this company mentioned on Slashdot, they're still referred to as 'MediaSentry (now SafeNet)'. Why? Is it because the MediaSentry name is still so evocative? Just call them what they are and reference the fact that they are in fact that company that used to be called MediaSentry.

      Mea culpa. I refer to them as MediaSentry. I don't think a crook should just be able to change its name and clean up its reputation that way.

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    4. Re:Why still 'MediaSentry' by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everytime I see this company mentioned on Slashdot, they're still referred to as 'MediaSentry (now SafeNet)'. Why? Is it because the MediaSentry name is still so evocative?

      It's because the name change is just a cynical attempt to try and get rid of a name that has 'negative connotations' attached to it, like Palladium becoming the Next-Generation Secure Computing Base [wikipedia.org], or the Security Systems and Standards Certification Act becoming the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act [wikipedia.org]. The new name is just designed to confuse people, so we list it alongside the old name to emphasize to everyone that nothing has changed, SafeNet is MediaSentry.

      Well spoken. I'm not as eloquent. So I just say that a crook shouldn't be able to clean up his reputation by changing his name.

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    5. Re:Why still 'MediaSentry' by Vectronic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just call them what they are and reference the fact that they are in fact that company that used to be called MediaSentry.

      Oh, I get it, so you'd rather it was "SafeNet (Formerly Known As MediaSentry)"... What difference does it make? I'm sure a lot of people still refer to them as MediaSentry, either because they prefer to, or because they still think it's called that, internally and publicly, most likely because that is what it is still called.

      Besides, there's no Wiki for SafeNet yet, only a line: "SafeNet - Owner of the online investigative company MediaSentry."

      Considering I don;t really give a damn, and wont bother to invesitage further, I find it interesting that A: There's no Wiki, and B: On the MediaSentry wiki, it says they were hired for this, and C: http://www.mediasentry.com/ does not redirect to http://www.safenet-inc.com/ it only mentions that SafeNet now owns MediaSentry, but MediaSentry still exists as a company.

    6. Re:Why still 'MediaSentry' by roedeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And Nazi supporters grand pa Bush, IBM, Volksvagen, Mercedes....did not change name and yet nobody cares.

      Perhaps they managed to regain (or at least some of them..) their reputation using other means, doesn't that sort of prove the point?

  3. BWAHAHAHA by DragonTHC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is such a crock.

    China doesn't own the broadcast rights to the Olympics. The Olympic Committee does.

    I wonder what other compromises the Olympic Committee made in Red China?

    Besides, Media Sentry is a joke. They will soon be hacked out of existance.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:BWAHAHAHA by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, rule number 1 of running something online. If you make hackers mad, they will hack. I believe that Scientology learned that

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  4. If we're lucky ... by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the Chinese Government will blame these idiots for the (inevitable, unstoppable) YouTubing of the Olympics, and have them all beheaded.

    1. Re:If we're lucky ... by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a perfect opportunity to point out that TVU Networks has a freely-available player, and loads of Chinese channels streaming across the internet at any given moment,... Good luck, MediaSentry guys! ;-)

  5. Tell me again by deepgrey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why someone decided to let the PRC host the 2008 Olympic games.

    1. Re:Tell me again by negRo_slim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some would say to help hasten and spread democratic ideals due to the large cultural exchange bound to happen with so many journalists and tourists in the country. Then again I'm sure PRC helped grease the wheels behind the scenes.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:Tell me again by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed! We'd never have let Nazi Germany host the Olympics!

    3. Re:Tell me again by z0idberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hadn't thought of it before but realised when I saw the starting time for the Opening Ceremony.

      08:08pm 08/08/2008.

      8 is a very lucky number in chinese culture. So I imagine they had a very big incentive to "win" the 2008 Olympics. Add this to Chinas amazingly strong economy, and the IOCs......questionable ...ethics in regards to bribes/payoffs then I think you can get the picture of how this one played out.

  6. This is rich by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China is arguable the largest pirate nation on the planet, who has next to zero respect for intellectual property of other nations.

    Now that their money is at stake here, they want to protect their content.

    Funny, that.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  7. Re:whaaa? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

    China concerned about piracy?

    I thought they added it as an Olympic sport this year?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  8. Re:Who'd want to pirate the Olympics? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I want to watch people running, I can go to my local park and do so for free.

    Out of curiosity, does this kind of fallacy have a name yet?

    Try this: Why would anyone pay for WoW? If I want to play a game, I can fire up GnuChess for free.

    Although, it would still be more interesting to watch what the athletes do in their time off...

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  9. Enough, already by AdamHaun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there a way to hide copyright/RIAA/MPAA/piracy stories? They don't seem to show up under any consistent category or author. I know I can just scroll past them, but then I'm still stuck reading the summary of every blow-by-blow account of the copyright wars. I know, the *AAs are evil, copyright terms are too long, yeah, I get it, I got it ten years ago, I don't need to hear it repeated ad nauseum.

    (Cue -1, Cares About Quality Of Slashdot mods)

    --
    Visit the
  10. Re:read carefully by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

    The IOC produces a "world feed" of all of the events that serves as the base for coverage in smaller nations. All the local team has to add is native language comments, and maybe a few closeup cameras for their nation's athletes in the event.

  11. sprit of freedom and openness my arse by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FTFA:
    "Aren't they supposed to be held in the spirit of freedom and openness?
    Not in China."
    yeah, blame china... The IOC doesn't have a track record for sending takedown notices / sueing to people displaying anything remotely Olympic branded:
    http://news.sbs.com.au/worldnewsaustralia/ioc_sues_website_using_olympics_logos_552593
    http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-7217512_ITM
    the IOC are just as bad as the MAFIIA, but they've got a perfect scapegoat to trial DRM this time around because the West aren't big fans of china as it is, so the IOC spin doctors say "we didn't want drm" publicly, while privately supporting the concept. /rant

    --
    -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
  12. The Olympics are pointless... by actionbastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In this day and age, competitions like this serve no purpose except to exploit the participants in these 'games'. Many, if not most, of those participating are hoping that they excel -just enough- to 'win the gold' so that they may secure lucrative product endorsement contracts with multi-national firms. Rarely, if ever, do any of these participants return for another try at Olympic glory after they have achieved -or failed to achieve- the brief stardom of the podium.

    If they do return and win, they may land contracts for a breakfast cereal or two of note and they may appear on the box for a year or two until they have been largely forgotten by the public. Then they go on to write an 'inspirational' book about their 'struggle against all odds' to achieve Olympic stardom. Finally, as their notoriety reaches its nadir, they sign on to do a reality-based television show on the E! channel that exploits their pathetic downward spiral and their life on the lecture circuit 'inspiring' people.

    --
    Sig this!
  13. Events for Hacker Olympics by Nymz · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Crack official websites, and alter front page.
    • Sneak cameras into events, and post cam torrents.
    • Crack DRM on region-limited video of events.
    • Moderate this post as funny, as quick as you can.
    1. Re:Events for Hacker Olympics by houghi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was the first to mod it funny. What did I win?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  14. Victims don't have a choice. by right+handed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No kidding - I've no need of organizations that exploit an ignorant public

    I think you misspelled oppress above. People do not chose to live in China, inadequate state education, or to be the targets of RIAA attacks. Please do not insult people stripped of their homes and political prisoners with such trivializations. These thugs punish innocent people.

    --
    M$, because life is too short to type icrosoft frequently.
    1. Re:Victims don't have a choice. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People do not chose to live in China

      Actually, a great many people do. It's not North Korea you know; people are allowed to leave.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Victims don't have a choice. by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These thugs punish innocent people.

      How do Chinese censorship laws differ from American drug laws? If the Chinese "thugs" punish innocent people, the American secret police (AKA "undercover agents" and "plainclothes police") and the masked thugs from the DEA also punish innocent people. I was one of their victimes last year; searched without warrant, made to stand in the July Illinois heat for an hour, and let go because there were in fact no drugs.

      Glass houses, folks. If you're American, rather than working to free the Chinese, how about working to free us Americans?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  15. Re:China's Cultural and Political Issues by giorgist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Funny that, they think the same for the US. Not that they are not in their own bubble.
    They see a highly consumerist country that weilds their power and lays countries to waist.
    Much like the many a muslim fundamentalists think of the US.

    Imagine walking the streets of NY, and seeing people spending their resource buying crap.
    Thinking they need crap, using practicaly naked bodies to sell crap ...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/century_of_the_self.shtml
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8953172273825999151

    I guess they think there is an expiration date to the US way of thinking

    So its a point of perspective

    G

  16. A merger in the future I think by richardkelleher · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Based on their compatible corporate moralities, I would expect SafeNet to merge with Blackwater any day now. Then RIAA could have ARMED criminal thugs with international immunity to carry out their agenda. I suspect they would like that.

  17. Re:star wars plot??? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

    This all kinda reminds me of a Star Wars prequel plot...

    Where'd you find that? One of the extras DVDs?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  18. Re:Who'd want to pirate the Olympics? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Informative

    Out of curiosity, does this kind of fallacy have a name yet?

    Fallacy of accident?

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  19. The geek is invincibly parochial by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There will 10,000 athletes competing for 931 medals - most will see their picture on an American cereal box.

    .
    Rarely, if ever, do any of these participants return for another try at Olympic glory after they have achieved -or failed to achieve- the brief stardom of the podium

    Athletes do return to the games.

    That is an extraordinary achievement in itself. It means, among other things, that there is training and financial support for the older athlete who wants to remain competitve in world competition.

    Look at the ages of some of these men and women:

    John Dale III. USA. 58, Sailing.
    The oldest athlete on the American team. His first Olympics.

    Libby Callahan. USA 56. Shooting.
    The oldest US female Olympian ever.

    Dara Torres. USA. 42. Swimming
    Her fifth Olympics. U.S. record time in the Olympic. trials. Oldest swimmer ever to qualify for the games.

    Hiroshi Hoketsu. 68. Japan. Equestrian.
    Retired Johnson & Johnson executive. Returning to the Olympics for the first time since Tokyo, 1964.

  20. Re:China's Cultural and Political Issues by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funny that, they think the same for the US. Not that they are not in their own bubble.
    They see a highly consumerist country that weilds their power and lays countries to waist.

    No they don't. Please ground yourself back to reality.

    If you ever been to a modern city in China (Shanghai, Beijing, Chongqing, Chengdu..etc), you will find everyone is living a capitalist lifestyle. If someone isn't getting into your face to sell you something, they are at least buying goods for themselves at supermarkets such as Carrefour and Wal-Mart. Even Bestbuy stores are starting to show up. And oh ya, they actually watch movies in the theaters. The behavior is not much different from that of Americans and Europeans.

    As for the Chinese people themselves? They're like you and I. They want to live their lives and not be messed with. In fact, most of them don't have any political or ideological preferences. They just know the quality of life has been improving over the years and want it to continue. Obviously political freedom and capitalistic expansion is the answer. However, most haven't figured out why these fundamentals work. They know they do, and just accept it "as-is" for now.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  21. New meme alert! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    MediaSentry and DRM: good enough for the Commies!

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  22. China see, China do? by janrinok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you suggesting that Twitter has no right to comment on the actions of the PRC or MediaSentry? If you are, then you are following in the footsteps of the PRC and their wish to control information and suppress free speech.

    I agree that Twitter is being stupid when he engages in one of his "single-person, numerous-monikas" conversations, but if he wishes to join in an intelligent conversation that he has as much right as you or I to do so.

    On the other hand, if you were just informing the GP that Twitter uses a specific monika then I am confused with that fact's relevance to the topic under discussion.

    --
    Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
  23. Re:An easier solution: by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because frankly, The Olympics are boring.

    Worse, when they come on, it's wall-to-wall coverage with NOTHING but Olympics news. And being a good Slashdotter and "geek" (the computer/networking kind, not the bites-heads-off-chickens kind), I'm not really all that much into sports.

    I personally feel the same way about most major sports venues, the Superbowl being a prime target. Just leave it on the Sports channels so the rest of us that don't give a damn don't have to have it shoved in our faces. Of course, no matter what happens, half the people where I work are freaking obsessed with it, so I can't escape it no matter what.

    I guess this is a large reason why I don't watch much T.V. anymore. Most of it is marketed to the same people that spend THOUSANDS to watch a bunch of roid-rage millionaires get sweaty for an hour or two. Bleah.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory