Slashdot Mirror


The Pirate Bay Blocked In Italy

imhassan tips us to news that The Pirate Bay has been blocked in Italy. Other attempts to block the popular P2P site have been somewhat less than successful. From TorrentFreak: "Pirate Bay's IPs and the domain name are inaccessible, as they are blocked by ISPs all over the country. Whether these blocks will be very effective, however, is doubtful, since The Pirate Bay has already announced several countermeasures. An insider working at an Internet provider in Italy told TorrentFreak that all the relevant large access ISPs in Italy have complied with the request to block the popular BitTorrent tracker, which was sent out yesterday. Italy is taking a stand against BitTorrent sites, so it seems. Two weeks ago, the largest Italian torrent site, Columbo-BT, was shut down by the same prosecutor who is responsible for the Pirate Bay block."

64 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was it the mafia? I heard that the mafia doesn't like pirates or fascists for that matter.

    1. Re:Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by ThePengwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      They must really hate fascist pirate ninjas then

  2. Pirate Bay by Oscar+Wilder · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only thing worse than blocking Pirate Bay is not blocking Pirate Bay.

  3. Tor is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tor is the answer to everything.
    Use Tor to access the trackers. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Tor is the answer by Moryath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually have a setup to do that already - I've seen a couple trackers "go down" due to core router / dns problems, and it was quite handy to use Tor to see if an alternate exit point had the same problems.

      I'd suggest people get the Tor package installer on general principles, it's quite useful to be able to torbutton for a bit if you're having trouble getting somewhere.

    2. Re:Tor is the answer by neokushan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, my ISP (bethere.co.uk) had some serious routing issues just last night, I couldn't even access the likes of Google and OpenDNS was entirely unreachable. However, good ol' Tor saved the day and I was able to browse as normal (Albeit slowly and carefully, so as to not send any important cookies or passwords) for the 2 and a half hours or so it took for them to fix it.
      Bollocks to privacy and all that, Tor has many applications and uses that I've come to rely on.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  4. Yeah, that will be effective. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless and until every system connected to the Internet needs a unique key of some sort before it's allowed to exchange packets, blocking anything will be completely ineffective.

    The current net neutrality debate is the first line of defense toward preventing such a system.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      even when they finally force us to logon to the internet via retina scans nothing will change. i'll simply resort the methods I used during the mid 80's... placing free ads in a cheap national magazine requesting "Atari ST contacts - swap hints and tips" and trade items via post just like the good-old days.

  5. at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Essequemodeia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Our fine Italian friends can still access TPB at labaia.org. Here's to hoping for as little irritation as possible.

    1. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Vectronic · · Score: 5, Informative

      La Baia
      The Bay

    2. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by exley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Our fine Italian friends can still access TPB at labaia.org.

      Except for the people who read that as "labia.org" and end up someplace completely different, although maybe not entirely disappointing to them...

    3. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I went to labia.com and labia.org and I was disappointed both times.

      Both are parked domains.

      I do this difficult task so you don't have to.

      --
      BMO

  6. Tor/proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That useless : use tor or another proxy to connect to the search engine/tracker (doesn't need high trafic).

    Once you got the *.torrent you want and the ip of the peer that share the file, you can connect directly to them without needing to pass by a proxy...

  7. This Reeks, But It's Still Not That Stinky Yet... by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this certainly has a lot of terrible implications, those people could just use other torrent sites. The only reason TPB is being blocked here is because of their notoriety. I honestly can find my trackers easier using other bit torrent sites anyway. And what will Italy do once people get their TPB trackers from other sites?

  8. Re:Common Carrier? by thermian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of what relevance is US law to Italy?

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  9. The Italians giving into authoritarian government? by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Say it isn't so!

    You know that Mussolini's party is still active in Italy right?

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  10. It's not blocked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am in Italy and I can surf to Pirate Bay right now. My ISP is Tiscali.

  11. Proxy Server by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Informative

    And have they managed to block every proxy server that can connect to every other proxy server that can see and connect to TPB? It just sounds like more press grandstanding to this observer.

    And how about an ICQ that serves up torrent files? The file you need to get from TPB just isn't that big.

    And how about IMBF (Information Must Be Free) people offering to e-mail in .tor files upon request? Got that blocked yet?

    Strikes me that shutting down TPB countywide (unless you're China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, or the like) isn't easy, or likely.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Proxy Server by javilon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They know that it is impossible to stop people from getting to it. But they also know that if they manage to reduce the amount of people that uses P2P down from what it is now (my guess is 80%~90%) to something like below 20%, then they will be able to say that this people are criminals.

      Right now, they should send to jail the whole country.

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
  12. Re:The TPB guys will do absolutely nothing about t by HappySmileMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've already changed their IP address and bought the domain name labaia.org for Italians to access the site. Seems very different from "absolutely nothing"

  13. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by badpazzword · · Score: 4, Informative

    Had you said, "Mussolini's *daughter* is in politics", you would have been correct.

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  14. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by damburger · · Score: 3, Informative

    They changed the name, but it was the same party, consisting of all the people who weren't hanging from lamp posts by the end of the war: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Social_Movement%E2%80%93National_Right

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  15. "web of trust" by khasim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Local groups sharing between themselves. Able to physically meet and verify each other.

    At the borders of that group, individuals physically moving material between groups. Very easy now with portable hard drives of a terabyte or more.

    So instead of material being available instantly ... it will be available in 7 days to anyone, anywhere. Because we all know that there are only 7 degrees of separation between any two people.

    1. Re:"web of trust" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeh, 7 days to everybody reading this, but Kevin Bacon will get it in 6, the bastard.

    2. Re:"web of trust" by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Local groups sharing between themselves. Able to physically meet and verify each other.

      It doesn't work, due to moles and snitches. Sooner or later someone is going to trust someone they shouldn't have -- it's human nature. And then the rest of the group inherits the trust, because that's also human nature.

      The only reasonably safe way of organizing a network is through cells, where even if one cell is corrupted, it won't spread to others. This holds true for computer networks too, but few if any applications support such a model. Those that are vaguely similar fail by having the node belong to multiple cells, thus making the impact of subversion much higher.

    3. Re:"web of trust" by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That seems like an awful lot of work for free entertainment. Why not just work some shit job and buy it?

    4. Re:"web of trust" by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you presuppose that anonymous sharing is only used for entertainment of the buyable kind?
      What if you're trading movies and books that are banned for blasphemy where you live?
      What if you're trading erotica that can't be sold where you are due to "decency" laws?
      Or what if you're trading video footage and documents which the government wants hushed up?

  16. Re:It's not blocked here... (and "aliased") by GennarinoParsifalle · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can confirm I can access the site (I'm in Italy, my ISP is Fastweb). Just in case it is blocked by some Italian ISP, it seems that labaia.org is a new alias. ;-)

  17. this... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is what happens when you elect a media owner as your country's president.

    Ciao free speech!

    1. Re:this... by antibryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're thinking of the Prime Minister. The president isn't involved in media companies.

  18. Why again was China bad? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh right, they block websites that could threaten what props their system up.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've used TPB for legal torrents as well as the "illegal" ones. I taste movies before buying them, and TPB is a great way to try before I buy. I actually spend MORE money on DVDs purchased legally because of this method.

    So the Italian prosecutor would call me a criminal. Fine. He's using public funding against what would be a "crime" between private parties. He's using the taxpayer's dollars to do the work the "harmed" party should be doing.

    In reality, Italy has far larger problems than issues between two private parties. There is RAMPANT corruption that is costing REAL dollars to the taxpayer. The Italian government should be seeking out bad seeds amongst themselves as a priority. There is also massive amounts of theft and loss within their own body; maybe they should focus on those problems?

    1. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by devman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've used TPB for legal torrents as well as the "illegal" ones. I taste movies before buying them, and TPB is a great way to try before I buy. I actually spend MORE money on DVDs purchased legally because of this method.

      Unfortunately the purpose for the download of copyrighted material does not make it anymore legal, no matter how one rationalizes it, it's just simply not your right.

      So the Italian prosecutor would call me a criminal. Fine. He's using public funding against what would be a "crime" between private parties. He's using the taxpayer's dollars to do the work the "harmed" party should be doing.

      If I assault you or defraud you, that is also a crime between private parties, yet the state will still prosecute it. You need to define your terms more carefully. Should the state be handling what should ultimately be a civil matter, no not really, but private parties has little to do with it.

    2. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately the purpose for the download of copyrighted material does not make it anymore legal, no matter how one rationalizes it, it's just simply not your right.

      At which point we get into the question of "why should I accept that my rights are defined by who can pay the most money to the legislature"?

    3. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by thealsir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. Like the extension of copyright terms into the stratosphere. Like the inability to copy parts of a DVD for fair usage. Like the current DRM'd media fiasco. That sure as heck sounds "balanced."

      Then there are the issues of media sharing and how it has often benefited artists, but not middlemen. This is a complex issue, because it is technically illegal, but people have done it dating back to the 60's with sharing phonograph records and tapes, and recording things off radio, and I guarantee you certain bands would not be as popular if that were not the case.

      How about this: Admit that the system is unbalanced in favor of one party instead of posting that "everything's fine" on Slashdot. "People making copyrighted work are humans too"...nice red herring that adds nothing to the discussion.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  20. Re:Torproject by thermian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I don't wish to distract from what is, in many respects, a premier example of the genus 'angry rant', I feel I should point out that no-one in Italy (or anywhere else that I know of) is actually blocking bittorrent.

    They are blocking a website which serves bittorrent files. There's rather a lot of difference.
    Also, lets get real, most of thepiratebays content links users to content which is being provided contrary to the laws of their countries.

    Is this wrong? Well, the debate goes on, but we get nowhere by pretending that everything's lovely with downloading 'unauthorised' content, and get with the real problem, that copyright itself is very broken.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  21. This prosecutor looks like a dedicated guy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suspect he has a lucrative career ahead of him in the entertainment industry. Wouldn't be the first case of that happening.

  22. Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italians by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the webpage:

    Fascist state censors Pirate Bay

    We're quite used to fascist countries not allowing freedom of speech. A lot of smaller nations that have dictators decide to block our site since we can help spread information that could be harmful to the dictators.

    This time it's Italy. They suffer from a really bad background as one of the IFPIs was formed in Italy during the fascist years and now they have a fascist leader in the country, Silvio Berlusconi. Berlusconi is also the most powerful person in Italian media owning a lot of companies that compete with The Pirate Bay and he would like to stay that way - so one of his lackeys, Giancarlo Mancusi, ordered a shutdown of our domain name and IP in Italy to make it hard to not support Berlusconis empire.

    We have had fights previously in Italy, recently with our successful art installation where we had to storm Fortezza in order to get our art done. And as usual, we won. We will also win this time.

    We have already changed IP for the website - that makes it work for half the ISPs again. And we want you all to inform your italian friends to switch their DNS to OpenDNS so they can bypass their ISPs filters. This will also let them bypass the other filters installed by the Italian government, as a bonus. And for the meanwhile - http://labaia.org/ works (La Baia means The Bay in Italian).

    And please, everybody should also contact their ISP and tell them that this is not OK and that the ISPs should appeal. We don't want a censored internet! And the war starts here...

  23. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by badpazzword · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And how many seats do they currently hold in the parliament?

    You're really beating the wrong cat. ;)

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  24. By the way... by creaktive · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Pirate Bay SSL proven ineffective: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=803927

  25. Re:Did they get a court order? by devman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure the owners of TBP don't want to step anywhere near a courtroom, even less for one not in their own country.

  26. Free Advertisement by fluch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a great country which provides again free advertisement for the Piratebay! After the pitfall of Denmark trying the same impossible thing ... will they ever learn?

  27. From the site itself by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://thepiratebay.org/blog/123 or http://labaia.org/blog/123 for people in Italy

    Copty and paste
    (I sure hope they don't sue me for copyright infringement)

    Fascist state censors Pirate Bay

    We're quite used to fascist countries not allowing freedom of speech. A lot of smaller nations that have dictators decide to block our site since we can help spread information that could be harmful to the dictators.

    This time it's Italy. They suffer from a really bad background as one of the IFPIs was formed in Italy during the fascist years and now they have a fascist leader in the country, Silvio Berlusconi. Berlusconi is also the most powerful person in Italian media owning a lot of companies that compete with The Pirate Bay and he would like to stay that way - so one of his lackeys, Giancarlo Mancusi, ordered a shutdown of our domain name and IP in Italy to make it hard to not support Berlusconis empire.

    We have had fights previously in Italy, recently with our successful art installation where we had to storm Fortezza in order to get our art done. And as usual, we won. We will also win this time.

    We have already changed IP for the website - that makes it work for half the ISPs again. And we want you all to inform your italian friends to switch their DNS to OpenDNS so they can bypass their ISPs filters. This will also let them bypass the other filters installed by the Italian government, as a bonus. And for the meanwhile - http://labaia.org works (La Baia means The Bay in Italian).

    And please, everybody should also contact their ISP and tell them that this is not OK and that the ISPs should appeal. We don't want a censored internet! And the war starts here...

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  28. It's working from here (Apulia/Puglia) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm in the very heel of Italy, Puglia, and it's working swimmingly. Needless to say I am also on some random's open wifi connectiont too ;)

  29. "mamma mia!!!" by frito_x · · Score: 2, Informative

    in the words of mario mario (yup... his last name's mario)

  30. Re:Yeah, that will be effective by monsul · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It doesn't need to work. It's a gesture, you see.

    Knowledgeable people in Italy will just use Tor or whatever to bypass the block. Less knowledgeable people will just move to the next big thing (mininova, kazaa, etc...)

    The "Goverment" will look like it has made as much as possible to protect the interests of the artist lobby groups that are pushing this

    ...and everybody is happy :)

    --
    Make It Secret Protect your privacy
  31. Still working for me by gigarello · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use the biggest italian ISP, Telecom Italia, and TPB is still reachable!!! I'm using opendns, maybe italan ISP just removed TPB form their dns...

  32. Re:Common Carrier? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    US IP laws have been being force fed to other countries via political maneurvering(sic).

    I think it's a little disingenuous to say that these are cases of the US exporting their IP laws.

    It's not so much the US government that is "forcing their laws" on other countries, as it is international corporations forcing these fascistic, protectionist laws down the throats of sovereign countries, just as they have done here in the US.

    Would you say that the behavior of Sony Music or EMI are the fault of the US?

    Those of you who still see the world as a game of Risk don't seem to realize that these multinational corporations see borders, and liberty, as damage and route around them.

    So you've got these incredibly wealthy and powerful multinational corporations vs. a group of nerds who can't even agree on Net Neutrality laws. Who the fuck do you think is going to win that one?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  33. Better yet - get involved by btarval · · Score: 5, Informative
    Go one step further beyond being a leech, by downloading and setting up a Tor exit node.

    And, since the usual RIAA fanbois usually pop up once you mention Tor, casting FUD to scare people away from it, here's the EFF's legal FAQ, and here's the Tor FAQ.

    Also note carefully what the parent said, namely, "Use Tor to access the trackers". Tor is, by default, set up to disable bittorrent transfers, since it heavily loads the Tor network. Here's one article which well explains Why you shouldn't run bittorrent over Tor.

    And if you look at the default exit node policies (see section 4.16 of the Tor FAQ), the standard bittorrent ports are explicitly rejected. So you really don't want to run bittorrent over Tor.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
    1. Re:Better yet - get involved by Stellian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go one step further beyond being a leech, by downloading and setting up a Tor exit node.

      I would be very careful with that. Running a TOR exit point will get your IP on all kinds of black lists and you will soon find you can't use your internet connection normally, you get strange timeouts, captchas whenever you try to search Google and so on. Just sniff a bit and see exactly what people are doing over your IP - you will be appalled. There are also all kinds of spiders that keep black lists of TOR proxyes (even non-exit nodes !). So I recommend running a TOR server only if you either have a dynamic IP, or you can dedicate a separate static IP to it.

      Also note carefully what the parent said, namely, "Use Tor to access the trackers". Tor is, by default, set up to disable bittorrent transfers, since it heavily loads the Tor network.

      To emphasize the GP's point, he was talking about setting the tracker (http announce) connection over TOR; this is totally negligible in terms of load (a few 1KB connections per hour, per active torrent) and perfectly effective against the mafia block. Running the actual bittorrent file transfer across TOR is quite a pointless thing to do: most exit nodes allow a very small white list of ports to connect to, so there's little chance of getting decent download speeds - you will only connect to very few peers or only over the very overloaded exit nodes with a more relaxed policy. All this aside from the implicit slowness of TOR. Simply put, I don't think you could download anything (thankfully - we need TOR for other things than piracy).

    2. Re:Better yet - get involved by MagdJTK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Running a TOR exit point will get your IP on all kinds of black lists and you will soon find you can't use your internet connection normally, you get strange timeouts, captchas whenever you try to search Google and so on.

      Very true. I've played around with Tor and a number of sites (understandably) ban all tor exit nodes from contributing. Wikipedia is an obvious example.

  34. Wishful thinking by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love these wishful thinking posts.

    Here's a newsflash for you: the authorities and big business have way, way more control over the Internet than you appear to realise. Companies like Google have the resources to index the entire web. Every major international pipe is controlled by one of a pretty small group of major telecomms companies. Despite the grand redundancy claims, there are plenty of single points of failure that will disconnect, or at least seriously inhibit, flow of data to or from entire countries.

    You can make defiant noises about how impractical it would be for the authorities to police everything and how important net neutrality is, but TPB is the enemy here, because by its very existence and public position on openly breaking the law in most countries, it provides all the evidence that politicians and their major contributors need to justify not fighting for net neutrality and pushing for ever more surveillance and control.

    A few years ago, there was all this talk about the Internet being some new, special place. Sorry, but it's neither above international agreements nor above individual countries enforcing their own laws and cutting off anyone who doesn't play nicely with their efforts to do so.

    The world will be a better place for most people if the freedom that generally exists on the Internet is preserved, but if that freedom is abused by a vocal minority, the rest of us will all get shafted by the consequences.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Wishful thinking by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's a newsflash for you: the authorities and big business have way, way more control over the Internet than you appear to realise

      Every major international pipe is controlled by one of a pretty small group of major telecomms companies

      You are oversimplifying things a great deal. You are not incorrect in stating that governments and businesses have a large control over the pipes themselves. However, there is a HUGE difference between controlling the pipe and controlling what goes through the pipe.

      You could say that the pipes and their routers would be like large highways with millions of people walking. At the intersections you could be checking the identity of every person and searching the contents of their bags. If this were true, then yes you would be right, a large amount of control could be exerted by governments and the corporations which control the highways and intersections.

      However, the Internet is not like that. You just cannot simply turn off a route and eliminate all flow to another network (which can affect a whole country) as often it would be like shooting a fly with a cannon. You would eliminate 1% undesirable traffic while also eliminating 99% of all the desirable traffic.

      So what do you have left as options to eliminate only the 1% of the traffic which is undesirable? Packet Inspection. There are several challenges to overcome if you are going to effectively block anything:

      1) Encryption. It's hard to tell with 100% accuracy what is going on with a session when you cannot read the packets. Encrypted packets, IPSec, VPN, etc. all raise the level of difficulty significantly which necessitates the next step.

      2) Behavioral Analysis. When you can't decrypt, sometimes you can tell what is going on by looking at other factors and clues.

      Now I know what you may want to say, that you can just block all traffic going to TPB's servers. What do you do about mirrors? What about VPN connections to servers that will host torrents and reside on wholly different networks outside of your control? How do stop the fact that somebody on the Internet can create a secure session with somebody else that does not have the same restrictions on their own network?

      With all due respect, the "Grand Redundancy" claims are valid. As long as a SINGLE country allows connections of any kind to a restricted network, while also not being restricted from the rest of the countries, people WILL be able to establish connections to the undesirables. This cannot be stopped.

      Please note that I am not writing this in support of The Pirate Bay or IP Piracy in general, but only to point out that your statement is just not factually correct. It IS wholly impractical for authorities to police the net as they will never be able to take the steps necessary to accomplish their goals as it would hurt more than help.

      Now if you disagree with my assessment, please provide a more detailed technical explanation of how such control can be exerted other than superficial observation that corporations own the pipes and governments can exert control over corporations.

    2. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Glad to see 2 well formulated posts on the subject. Props.

      I will not dive deep into the technical issues as it would take a whole lot of "what ifs" and "What nots" to predict what technology could and would be implemented at some stage to counter illegal filesharing.

      But the parent post adds a very interesting point:
      The Internet is a carrier of freedom, but here as everywhere else in society it doesnt come without responsibility. TPB does not advocate this responsibility, in my view, at a very high level. Further down the road, this _could_ lead to stronger control of user activities and/or net neutrality. I dont think most small-time pirates gives this much thought, and it _could_ prove a high price to pay. Since stuff like P2P and spam takes alot of bandwith without any of the service and content providers making money, it is not far fetched to think that ISPs in the future will consider giving up identities behind IPs that are "too active" on illegal filesharing or similar activities. Or even be forced to do so by governments.

      Even though the regular slashdot-user can throw up a few proxies and dive into the comfort zone of being anonymous in no time, this is not the case with most filesharers. And the minute the neighbour's kids start getting lawsuits in their mail, parents will stop bragging about the net skills of their prodigys and how they "just download whatever they want" (like my parents did), and start learning them about property rights instead. Trust me.

      I am in the position that I have run 2 companies for the about 10 years. Rarely enough, the first one doing high end web programming, and the second a small Indie recordlabel. Needless to say, I have been puleld between my love for the net, and my love for music. For years I have been in heavy conflicts with most of the music biz, advocating offensive use of the net as a new distribution channel rather than lawsuits and war with consumers.

      However ive started to come to the conclusion that this is a sociological issue rather than a technical one. There are elements in the arguments coming from filesharers that rises issues not possible to solve through technology.

      1. The "War on the greedy music biz" is failing. Or that is, it might be won, but at a high price. Running a small label I slowly started realizing that Im the one loosing the battle, not the major labels. The reason is simple. You wont find my music on TPB. And even when i put it there myself, people would still look around for Britney Schmears or whatever other brand the majors are launching at any given time through advertisements, media control and whatever. And even in the rare case they DO seek up my music, and even want to support my label by buying the record, they most likely wont be able to as most indies cannot distribute their records to all corners of the world until long after the air is out of the balloon.

      In this way, people using illegal filesharing strenghtens the market position of the MAJOR labels, not the vivid but oh so weak Indie scene. Market power sucks, eh?

      2. There seems to be alot of kids out there who really thinks music is free, and that the attempts to put down the likes of TPB is taking something away from them that they always had. This is disturbing. Ive had kids mailing me to have me send them rips of CDs as they had trouble finding them on the net. They dont thank me when I do, as they see it as a given right, and bad service from us when its not available for download. Needless to say, this is not the kids that will drive forward a music scene in the future. I dont know what this means in practical terms, but its a new kind of customer that will be pretty close to impossible to serve. This is not ideal for a number of reasons that most can work out for themselves.

      3. The filesharers has a free choice to avoid stealing and hustling music they dont own any tights to. There is free music out there for several lifetimes of listening. Still people wants the stuff that they have to pay for. Why? Partly due

    3. Re:Wishful thinking by catxk · · Score: 4, Informative

      The world will be a better place for most people if the freedom that generally exists on the Internet is preserved, but if that freedom is abused by a vocal minority, the rest of us will all get shafted by the consequences.

      How can you call it freedom if it's removed if you take advantage of it? If I have freedom, you cannot remove it. If you can, it's not freedom. That's sort of the point.

      TPB is not the enemy here. TPB is an indicator on how corrupt our political overlords are, especially in Italy. Once a fascists...

      --
      Don't be crazy anymore!
    4. Re:Wishful thinking by UnixUnix · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Excellent posts, this and parents. Let me add a small point: I know a number of "kids" in various European countries who live on 700 -800 Euros a month. They tell me, after paying rent, water and power and making a trip to the supermarket for groceries they are down to coin money until next month. So the music they obtain through P2P is not music they would have bought otherwise; rather, they would have done without it. As it is, I do get to find out what music they play -- and I for one do buy music that I like. The net effect for those selling music is positive.

      I do believe the evils of music sharing are being overstated.

  35. Just the DNS A replies are squishy by eaman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I semms like that Telecom, wich is italian n.1 priver, is just gibbering the DNS replay: A query for thepiratebay.org returns 127.0.0.1 .
    So just a static record in you /etc/hosts should do:

    # echo -e "83.140.176.200 thepiratebay.org\n83.140.176.156 torrents.thepiratebay.org" >> /etc/hosts

    Or you (gentle italian reader) can just use a different DNS. Http is fine, so appears to be the peer to peer thing.

    You know: it's not like I fell the need to download some copyrighted materials, it's just that _I_'m used to be the one who blocks things in my net, and I go mad when someone tricks my DNS (they did some other trash on those DNS some time ago as a sort of forwarder for mispelled domains: some one in there found a new toy and since then each day they play a new trick...).

  36. Re:la baia ! by iminplaya · · Score: 2

    Someone really should to put a bullet through Berlusconi's fascisti face.

    Advocating violence is hardly insightful. I do believe he did win an election. Maybe something more along the lines of not voting for him would be more appropriate, no?

    --
    What?
  37. Re:Yeah, that will be effective by cyb97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Less knowledgeable, or pragmatic?

    Not being able to access PirateBay isn't really critical. People can get their less-than-legal software and porn elsewhere, it's the principle that's important.

    For what it's worth, I'm somewhat doubtful to whether or not most of the piratebay users really give a crap about free speech, net neutrality and so on, as long as they can download stuff for free...

  38. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just grow a small amount in the front garden everyone will assume no one will be stupid enough to grow it so openly and will think its another plant. Bonus points for growing it among ferns that look like it as a friend of mine did.

  39. "the law" does not equal morality.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They have no right to strip away your capacity to consciously choose to break a law you feel is unjust.

    They have a right to prosecute or litigate against you for it, but they don't have a right to impede your free will!

    When you start doing this, it's called fascism. Information gets censored because it's "dangerous" and will "incite criminal actions". Butcher knives should be banned too! they are clearly designed with the express purpose of slicing flesh, and humans are made of flesh.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  40. Business acumen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "War on the greedy music biz" is failing. Or that is, it might be won, but at a high price. Running a small label I slowly started realizing that Im the one loosing the battle, not the major labels. The reason is simple. You wont find my music on TPB. And even when i put it there myself, people would still look around for Britney Schmears or whatever other brand the majors are launching at any given time through advertisements, media control and whatever. And even in the rare case they DO seek up my music, and even want to support my label by buying the record, they most likely wont be able to as most indies cannot distribute their records to all corners of the world until long after the air is out of the balloon.

    It sounds more to me like the business model you have for your music is wrong.

    1) I find it very hard to believe in this day and age that you couldn't sell world-wide through the Internet.

    2) The fact that you don't even publish a link to your music here on Slashdot makes me believe that you're missing important business opportunities. Or is this connected with (1) (you would have no way to profit from Slashdotters being interested in your music)?

    3) Your music may just be too "niche", in which case you'll just have to live with the reality that you're never going to be the next Brittney Spears, and will have to keep a day job also.

  41. Re:la baia ! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They were the largest party though. Their opponents like Schleicher planned to abolish parliament and form a grand coalition of all the non Nazi Parties (and the left wing of the Nazi party) to keep them out of power.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_von_Schleicher#Chancellorship

    chleicher hoped to attain a majority in the Reichstag by forming a so-called Querfront, meaning "cross-front," whereby he would unify Germany's fractious special interests around a non-parliamentary, authoritarian but participatory regime. Thus, he reached out to the Social Democratic labour unions, the Christian labour unions and the more left-wing branch of the NSDAP or Nazis, led by Gregor Strasser. Strasser, however, was already losing the internal power struggle with Hitler.

    Although Schleicher made some initial progress, he was rebuffed by both sides. Meanwhile, the ousted Papen now had Hindenburg's ear, because the latter was beginning to have misgivings about Schleicher's "cryptoparliamentarianism" and willingness to work with the SPD, which the old President despised. Papen was urging the aged President to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in a coalition with the Nationalist DNVP, or Deutschenationale Volkspartei (German National People's Party) who, together with Papen, would supposedly be in a position to moderate Nazi excesses. Unbeknownst to Schleicher, Papen was holding secret meetings with both Hitler and Hindenburg, who then refused Schleicher's request for emergency powers and another dissolution of the Reichstag. The President dismissed Schleicher, calling Hitler into power on 30 January 1933.

    In many ways it makes you wonder what would have happened if the CIA had been around. Presumably they would have backed anyone but the Nazis or Communists, even dubious types like Schleicher.

    The fact of the matter was that the democracy was doomed - either it would be replaced by Schleicher's authoritarian grand coalition or by Hitler as dictator. And if the Nazis had crushed the Communists, they would have taken over and set up a Communist dictatorship.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  42. ISPs economic incentives... by js_sebastian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since stuff like P2P and spam takes alot of bandwith without any of the service and content providers making money

    Excuse me, but how do the ISPs make money? from users subscription. And why do users care that their internet access have decent bandwidth (beyond the cheap basic service they need to read their mail on google or yahoo?) because of large, multimedia downloads, which are effectively distributed (legally or illegally) over P2P.
    The ISPs have no natural economic incentive to block whatever the users want to do, unless either:

    a) they have a flawed billing model, where they provide extremely high bandwidth at a flat rate and expect users not to use it

    OR b) anticompetitive, vertical integration: the ISPs are also content providers, and want to hook you into whatever shit they are selling you

    Of course, anti-P2P regulation can provide such incentive (by giving ISPs big fines if they don't block P2P, for instance).