Slashdot Mirror


Olympic Opening Ceremony Fireworks Were (Partly) Faked

A complete newb writes "London's Telegraph newspaper reports that some of the fireworks which appeared over Beijing during the television broadcast of the Olympic Opening Ceremony were actually computer generated. But — hold on — it's not necessarily as bad as you think. The faked fireworks were actually set-off at the stadium, but because of potential dangers in filming the display live from a helicopter, viewers at home were shown a pre-recorded, computer-generated shot." To me, the reasoning behind the faked display is no consolation or excuse — it seems hard to swallow that NBC was unaware of this televised deception. I'm glad that it was good-naturedly "revealed" this weekend (according to that Telegraph article), but it's disheartening that such a large crowd can watch (in person, and around the world) such a display and have no reason to realize they've been duped. What about when weightier events are at issue? There's also a slightly more detailed story at sky.com.

19 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. Why not ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... just switch to a live video feed from South Ossetia?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  2. sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey captain obvious, I vividly remember the NBC announcer stating they were computer generated as it was happening.

    Off your high horse please.

    1. Re:sigh... by Kristoph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More importantly, the summary makes it seem like some part of the fireworks were 'faked'.

      In fact, what we're talking about is the fireworks view from above. Rather than being a helicopter shot it was CGI matched to the fireworks.

      There were still actual fireworks in place, they just did the CGI to give viewers an idea of what the fireworks looked like from different angles.

      This is such a non story. The MSM is obviously playing it up because of insufficient olimpic drama but really, does Slashdot have to do the same?

      ]{

  3. So what? by orzetto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's disheartening that such a large crowd can watch (in person, and around the world) such a display and have no reason to realize they've been duped.

    What's the problem? You want a series of impressive images on your screen. What's the issue with having them in CGI instead of real-life fireworks? The end result is the same. I could get your argument if we were talking about some olympic discipline being duped, with doping, corruption or otherwise, but fireworks are just eye candy. How it gets to your retina is quite irrelevant.

    And by the way, doing it in CGI is also more environmentally friendly: compounds used in fireworks are not always of the most benign sort.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:So what? by bughunter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I tend to agree with orzetto -- it was entertainment and art, from beginning to end. The slippery slope argument in this case is, I'm afraid, a fallacy.

      Now, if the faked images had been associated with real news -- war, human rights, natural disaster, etc. -- then there would be grounds for a scandal. But this? It was a spectacle even without the "digital pyrotechnics."

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:So what? by wattrlz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it's a slippery slope. First they're faking the fireworks, then they're faking the torch run, eventually the gold medal will go with whoever can render the fastest while the athletes relax back at the club.

      It seems to me the OP is mad because he feels lied to. He feels they didn't do enough to say that they were creating the spectacle artificially and thus perpetrated a fraud which sets an unpleasant precedent.

    3. Re:So what? by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a just slippery slope argument. NBC News has violated an important rule for any news organization. It knowingly presented falsified images as true.

      True, the harm it does to viewers is trivial. The party that is harmed is NBC news. If NBC did not issue a disclaimer while showing the images in question, what it tells us is that NBC News is willing to mislead us if in their opinion the viewers are better off believing the falsehoods.

      So, if NBC doesn't subscribe to the theory that fictionalized representations of the facts ought to bear a disclaimer, then we must wonder exactly what they think the boundaries of their license to tinker with reality are.

      Naturally, I think this is just a stupid gaffe. But if I were in charge of this particular NBC operation, I'd be issuing an apology and promise not to do it again.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. The Olympics are a SHOW by tjstork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok? The idea is for the entire world to be entertained at which should be a truce among the nations of the world bringing its best athletes to the tables. Putting on a good show for the olympics is part of the drill.

    I'm always looking for a good shot at China but I think this time around we should cut these people a break. They've done a good job with the Olympics so far.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:The Olympics are a SHOW by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, didn't work in Georgia, did it?

      Look, clearly the modern Olympics is just silly and pretentious. The idea that is some kind of movement that unites humanity in sport is so bizarre it defies belief anybody could seriously pretend it is true. If that's true, why do athletes march, like troops, behind their national flags? Why is the big triumph standing on the podium and having your national anthem played?

      The ancient Olympiad didn't have any of these kind of national (or city state) trappings. I'm sure that people had their home town favorites, but athletes traveled under the Olympic truce to compete at the games as individuals.

      I think it's great that people look at track and field, archery, judo and badminton etc. every four years. But the shear pretentiousness of the whole enterprise is galling. The drawn out fiasco of the Olympic torch relay was the wages of misty eyed attachment to an absurdity.

      It'd all be just as good, or better, without all the ridiculous hype. I think it's bad that it's a show, that it's become bread and circuses doused with saccharine political symbolism, like a political convention where red and white balloons dropping from the ceiling are supposed to mean something.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  5. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An upside-down flag is a distress signal, not a sign of disrespect.

    Perfectly appropriate considering the kid's city was jut flattened don't you think?

  6. It goes to credibility... by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and eventually, this kind of deficit spending will bankrupt the media.

    I do wonder why they keep pushing the edge of the envelope like this, though. The urge to alter reality doesn't really resonate with me. Just show it how it really happened. People are tuning in to experience a real event, not some imagined account of what the fireworks might have looked like.

    If things continue to trend this way, the media will eventually find it far easier to simply fabricate all the news. They'd never have to leave the studio, and could script out events over and over until they got just the right shot. I mean seriously, if they're not going to have 100% journalistic integrity, why have any at all?

  7. Wait... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait. Are we seriously going to complain about this? If this doesn't count as much ado about nothing, I don't know what does. This isn't manipulation of the media - this is simply enhancing the televised broadcast of a ceremony for the opening of the Olympic games. Good gawd, get some perspective.

  8. Footprints by jamie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DoD producing propaganda for foreign (wink) audiences. Good evidence just came out that the White House forged a war-justification document. Stovepiped intelligence. Hush money to truth-tellers. Known-false public WMD claims. "This isn't about intelligence, it's about regime change." "Fuck Saddam, we're taking him out." Facts fixed around the policy. Leaks to "billboard" media to punish truth-tellers' families. Embedded reporters, sent home for publishing actual war photographs. Talking points piped from the White House to the top news corporations, often repeated as directives to the "journalists" who frame each day's news. Seven years of lapdog media pundits laughing along with the right-wingers who call for their assassination while they seriously discuss whether the 60% of Americans who still somehow hold political beliefs at odds with the ruling administration are traitors.

    But the fireworks show China is deceptive.

    1. Re:Footprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      DoD producing propaganda for foreign (wink) audiences. Good evidence just came out that the White House forged a war-justification document. Stovepiped intelligence. Hush money to truth-tellers. Known-false public WMD claims. "This isn't about intelligence, it's about regime change." "Fuck Saddam, we're taking him out." Facts fixed around the policy. Leaks to "billboard" media to punish truth-tellers' families. Embedded reporters, sent home for publishing actual war photographs. Talking points piped from the White House to the top news corporations, often repeated as directives to the "journalists" who frame each day's news. Seven years of lapdog media pundits laughing along with the right-wingers who call for their assassination while they seriously discuss whether the 60% of Americans who still somehow hold political beliefs at odds with the ruling administration are traitors.

      1964, Vietnam War: Gulf of Tonkin incident.

      1917, First World War: Zimmerman telegram.

      1898, Spanish-American War: "Remember the Maine, to hell with Spain!"

      1846, Mexican-American War: The Thornton Affair.

      1774: First Continental Congress: Persistent rumors in Philadephia that the British had burned Boston to the ground.

      Dude, entering a war under false or misleading pretenses is a proud and patriotic American tradition. Get a grip.

  9. Opening Ceremony On Steroids... by blcamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...so friggin' what!

    Just as long as the ATHLETES are NOT on steroids, and the COMPETITION ITSELF is real... that's all I care about.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
  10. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does it really matter if the fireworks were partially faked or not?

    The main goal of the ceremony is to entertain millions (perhaps billions?) of people and in my very humble opinion they succeded at that pretty damn well.
    Hell, the first 1.5 hrs of the opening was one of the most magnificent shows ever to put on the face of the earth.

    And correct me if I'm wrong, but they could have computer generated a lot more parts of the show and they didn't. The people in the boxes for instance?
    I don't really care what was real or not.. All I know is that I frequently had to pick up my jaw from the ground. And that was the ultimate goal. Period.

    --
    Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
  11. It can be both.. kindof. by wizzahd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I definitely saw legs, but I also saw some sort of supports. I imagine that the blocks had some kind of contraption to make it easier for the people to lift them up and down with such fluidity. Not to mention that they would all have to be constrained to move up and down; I didn't see them wobble at all.

  12. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by daemonhunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But eh, George W. is an idiot and messes up everything American anyway.

    Whom do we petition for "Line Item" Flamebait moderation? I was with you as "Informative," till this point.

  13. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could see the hydraulic pistons moving up and down. Especially near the end when the blocks were raised very high and you could see underneath them.

    I would ask, "Do they think we're that stupid", but alas, many folks are willing to ignore facts observed by their own eyes if a credible TV person states something different.

    Anyone who was paying attention during that part of the show could see that it was people inside the boxes. The only "obviously false" thing is the disinformation you're posting here. I just can't figure out what your purpose is in doing so.