Slashdot Mirror


Olympic Opening Ceremony Fireworks Were (Partly) Faked

A complete newb writes "London's Telegraph newspaper reports that some of the fireworks which appeared over Beijing during the television broadcast of the Olympic Opening Ceremony were actually computer generated. But — hold on — it's not necessarily as bad as you think. The faked fireworks were actually set-off at the stadium, but because of potential dangers in filming the display live from a helicopter, viewers at home were shown a pre-recorded, computer-generated shot." To me, the reasoning behind the faked display is no consolation or excuse — it seems hard to swallow that NBC was unaware of this televised deception. I'm glad that it was good-naturedly "revealed" this weekend (according to that Telegraph article), but it's disheartening that such a large crowd can watch (in person, and around the world) such a display and have no reason to realize they've been duped. What about when weightier events are at issue? There's also a slightly more detailed story at sky.com.

22 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. So what... by geeper · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...my wife fakes her fireworks all the time and it doesn't bother me.

    --
    Error reading device 'Signature'. (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?
  2. sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey captain obvious, I vividly remember the NBC announcer stating they were computer generated as it was happening.

    Off your high horse please.

  3. Yeah, no kidding. by eli867 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unaware? obviously weren't listening during th broadcast. The NBC announcers were talking about how some of the effects were computer enhanced. They specifically said there were "digital pyrotechnics" used during the camera shot that zoomed across the city showing fireworks exploding all around.

  4. So what? by orzetto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's disheartening that such a large crowd can watch (in person, and around the world) such a display and have no reason to realize they've been duped.

    What's the problem? You want a series of impressive images on your screen. What's the issue with having them in CGI instead of real-life fireworks? The end result is the same. I could get your argument if we were talking about some olympic discipline being duped, with doping, corruption or otherwise, but fireworks are just eye candy. How it gets to your retina is quite irrelevant.

    And by the way, doing it in CGI is also more environmentally friendly: compounds used in fireworks are not always of the most benign sort.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:So what? by bughunter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I tend to agree with orzetto -- it was entertainment and art, from beginning to end. The slippery slope argument in this case is, I'm afraid, a fallacy.

      Now, if the faked images had been associated with real news -- war, human rights, natural disaster, etc. -- then there would be grounds for a scandal. But this? It was a spectacle even without the "digital pyrotechnics."

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  5. The Olympics are a SHOW by tjstork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok? The idea is for the entire world to be entertained at which should be a truce among the nations of the world bringing its best athletes to the tables. Putting on a good show for the olympics is part of the drill.

    I'm always looking for a good shot at China but I think this time around we should cut these people a break. They've done a good job with the Olympics so far.

    --
    This is my sig.
  6. NBC Commentator *stated* part simulated by crepe-boy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slow day on Slashdot? I don't know where the conspiracy nuts get their information - were they actually watching the programme? The NBC commentator stated quite clearly that the 29 displays across Beijing that signified the 29 olympiads were simulated. They didn't got into detail about it but they certainly didn't hide it.

  7. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An upside-down flag is a distress signal, not a sign of disrespect.

    Perfectly appropriate considering the kid's city was jut flattened don't you think?

  8. NBC said it was a "cinematic animation" by Blackwulf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I watched the opening ceremonies twice and the commentators did state something to the effect of "They want this ceremony to be cinema in real time, but what you're watching right now is actually cinematic, it's all animation of these footsteps leading to the National Stadium." They did not outright say "hey this is prerendered CG" but they DID state that this was "true cinematics" and that it was animation.

    They were well aware of it and did a poor job of communicating it to viewers. I can tell how most people would have missed it.

  9. The 1992 torch lighting by flaming arrow was faked by kaptain80 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in 1992, the Olympic torch in Barcelona was supposed to be lit by an archer shooting a flaming arrow. Yeah... no. He shot it towards the cauldron, but it was set to be lit on its own via pyros. The flaming arrow passed way over the cauldron, safe from setting any of the audience on fire or perforating them, and the torch lit anyway.

    OR MAYBE IT WAS AN OLYMPIC MIRACLE AND HE HIT IT

    Link: The Source of All Knowledge

    --
    Kurt Vonnegut: "If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in the kingdom of the blind."
  10. How about this by davmoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    To me, the reasoning behind the faked display is no consolation or excuse

    Then next time, Timothy, we'll let you fly the helicopter while fireworks are being shot at it.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  11. Wait... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait. Are we seriously going to complain about this? If this doesn't count as much ado about nothing, I don't know what does. This isn't manipulation of the media - this is simply enhancing the televised broadcast of a ceremony for the opening of the Olympic games. Good gawd, get some perspective.

  12. Footprints by jamie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DoD producing propaganda for foreign (wink) audiences. Good evidence just came out that the White House forged a war-justification document. Stovepiped intelligence. Hush money to truth-tellers. Known-false public WMD claims. "This isn't about intelligence, it's about regime change." "Fuck Saddam, we're taking him out." Facts fixed around the policy. Leaks to "billboard" media to punish truth-tellers' families. Embedded reporters, sent home for publishing actual war photographs. Talking points piped from the White House to the top news corporations, often repeated as directives to the "journalists" who frame each day's news. Seven years of lapdog media pundits laughing along with the right-wingers who call for their assassination while they seriously discuss whether the 60% of Americans who still somehow hold political beliefs at odds with the ruling administration are traitors.

    But the fireworks show China is deceptive.

  13. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The NBC announcer said something about " virtual flythrough" or somesuch as it was shown, which made my wife and I discuss why they were showing us simulated film. Those steps looked obviously faked up until the few near the stadium.

    I'd get the exact wording, but we've already deleted it from the DVR.

    I don't know why this is news. It was said on air and obvious at the time.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  14. Opening Ceremony On Steroids... by blcamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...so friggin' what!

    Just as long as the ATHLETES are NOT on steroids, and the COMPETITION ITSELF is real... that's all I care about.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
  15. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Libya's flag has been upside down every time I've ever seen it - They must be a very distraught country.

    Japan seems to be pretty panicky too...

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  16. So that explains... by jhsiao · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the coziness between China and Iran. China shares advanced missile technology with Iran who reciprocates with advanced computer-generated rocket-launch capability.

  17. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does it really matter if the fireworks were partially faked or not?

    The main goal of the ceremony is to entertain millions (perhaps billions?) of people and in my very humble opinion they succeded at that pretty damn well.
    Hell, the first 1.5 hrs of the opening was one of the most magnificent shows ever to put on the face of the earth.

    And correct me if I'm wrong, but they could have computer generated a lot more parts of the show and they didn't. The people in the boxes for instance?
    I don't really care what was real or not.. All I know is that I frequently had to pick up my jaw from the ground. And that was the ultimate goal. Period.

    --
    Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
  18. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Informative

    Indeed. The NBC commentator specifically said, as the footage was being shown, that the event's producers were using a cinematic interlude to convey the concept of the fireworks. The actual firewoks WERE going off at the same time, and in much the same way... but there was simply no way to be sure they could show it well on TV - since it was impossible to predict the weather or other cirumstances. So, they showed a CGI illustration for the people watching TV. The weren't hiding anything, they came right out and SAID what they were doing.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  19. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by Rokewaju · · Score: 5, Informative

    In reply to whether or not you the footage you saw was from a International Common Feed, the answer is: Yes

    NBC and the other rights holding broadcasters use the feed that is originated by the "Host Broadcaster" in this case Beijing Olympic Broadcasting. NBC and the other rights holding broadcasters can pay to have extra cameras in the stadium/venue. Those cameras are typically used for close ups of dignitaries and athletes from that Broadcaster's country in addition to "Beauty Shots" (scenic shots of landmarks or landscapes that are not covered by the International Feed). However that footage is generally less than 5% of the total footage, the rest of it comes from the International feed. The Host broadcaster will add their own commentary over top the International feed and in some cases their own graphics (or additional graphics specific to that network/broadcaster). The Host Broadcaster originates all the of the TV footage for the Games including the Opening and Closing Ceremonies.

    I worked on the crews of three Olympics (2002, 2004, 2006) with my spouse working for the Host Broadcaster for each of those games.

    --
    No, I don't have anything planned for you, I promise...
  20. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The hydraulic pistons were the actor's legs.

    http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/5306/peoplebn2.gif

    At the end of the act the tops were removed so the actors could wave to the crowd (or else robotics were really, really advanced).

  21. Re:Only a small part looked simulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could see the hydraulic pistons moving up and down. Especially near the end when the blocks were raised very high and you could see underneath them.

    I would ask, "Do they think we're that stupid", but alas, many folks are willing to ignore facts observed by their own eyes if a credible TV person states something different.

    Anyone who was paying attention during that part of the show could see that it was people inside the boxes. The only "obviously false" thing is the disinformation you're posting here. I just can't figure out what your purpose is in doing so.