Slashdot Mirror


Smart Self-Service Scales

Roland Piquepaille writes "German researchers have developed intelligent self-service scales for supermarkets, able to recognize fruit or vegetables placed on them (photo). The scales automatically recognize the item being weighed and ask the customer to choose between only those icons that are relevant, such as various kinds of tomatoes. The scales are equipped with a camera and an image evaluation algorithm that compares the image of the item on the scale with images stored in its database. Store managers can add items to the database. The scales are now being tested in about 300 supermarkets across Europe."

65 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Too bad.. by matt4077 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I quite enjoyed the apparent abolition of self-service scales in favor of weighing fruits at checkout. Let's hope they don't make a comeback.

    1. Re:Too bad.. by aproposofwhat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But given the level of knowledge of the average checkout person, this might be more useful at the tills - having to explain to the staff what 'fennel' or 'parsnip' (I kid you not - it actually happens) is can get kind of frustrating after a while.

      I can see this technology helping the checkout staff - of course, staff training might help as well (looking at you, Tesco...)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    2. Re:Too bad.. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Around here, the cashiers don't have to know what it is. Just throw it on the scale and type in the PLU code that's on the sticker.

    3. Re:Too bad.. by Swizec · · Score: 2, Funny

      How the hell can someone not differ between a salad and a spice? I'm a sworn meat eater and even I can tell the difference!

    4. Re:Too bad.. by sirambrose · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My grocery store has self service scales and I really love them. They are meant to be used with the portable self checkout scanners. The scanners allow me to scan and bag my groceries as I shop. When I leave, I pay at a small kiosk by the door. I don't have to wait in line even if I shop when the store is very busy. I wish this sort of system was more common.

    5. Re:Too bad.. by smchris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. Daikon in my case. Isn't that just an indication these people _won't_ be retrained as rocket scientists? I hate auto-check-outs and never use them. More work for me, I assume more profit for the supermarket instead of lower prices, and I get to pay for somebody's unemployment/retraining. And, to be honest, you go back to the same place every week, there is the sociological angle as some of them become "familiar strangers". Why do I want to crap on them?

      Nonetheless, "reprogramable" object recognition simple enough for a supermarket manager to use is a good hack.

    6. Re:Too bad.. by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fresh Cilantro or Curly Parsley look somewhat similar, and are often thrown in the same bin in the produce department.

      You'll sure as hell notice the difference when cooking though!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    7. Re:Too bad.. by Narpak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well knowing all the PLU codes for all the types of vegetables can be hard, depending on how big a selection the store has. Used to work at a grocery store; had a very very wide selection of stuff. I imagine any vegetable recognizing application would be useful regardless of whether you weight on scales in the shop or at the checkout.

    8. Re:Too bad.. by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That depends on how granular it gets. It sounds like it could only narrow it down to "apple" or "tomato"; the weird stuff that drove me batty as a cashier would probably just come up as "weedy thing"...

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    9. Re:Too bad.. by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think they are talking about fruit and veggies you bag mate, the ones without any stickers. There is no associated code on the bags and the attendant has to know the type of food before weighing it.

      This device could help identify the various types that look similar. Although I gotta wonder how it's gonna handle the difference between a McIntosh and a Red Delicious apple. From the article it seems that it will just identify "apple" and then give the user choices. Which makes me wonder how much more useful this identification will be over the typical self-checkout you see in grocery stores.

    10. Re:Too bad.. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know who they pay to do it, but over here (in New Mexico, anyway) the grocery stores have nearly every piece stickered. Every last apple, orange and peach. And all the veggies, too. Our cashiers can be (and often are) blithering idiots.

    11. Re:Too bad.. by sirambrose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The store is Giant Eagle in Frederick Maryland. I don't know if all their stores have the system. There is an article about it here.

    12. Re:Too bad.. by chubs730 · · Score: 2
      4023 on the red seedless grapes, 4282 on the grapefruit, 4088 for the red peppers, 4064 for the avocados, 4066 for green beans, 4062 for cucumbers, 3121 for orange peppers, 4072 for russet potatoes, 4080 for asparagus, 4017 for granny smith apples, 4020 for golden delicious, 4044 for "orchard perfect" peaches, 4378 for "orchard perfect" nectarines, 4440 for plums, 4159 for vidalia onions, 4082 for red onions, 94068 for organic scallions, actually throw a 9 in front of anything for its organic variants, yeah...work sucks.

      I'm working on breaking into the server room though, to program one of the buttons to start up nethack or something on my down time.

  2. Oblig. by elguillelmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new intelligent self-service weighing overlords

    --
    Dawkins Revisited: A person is shit's way of making more shit -- Steve Barnett, anthropologist.
  3. Not shown in picture by frisket · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Except that the linked picture shows strawberries on the scales, but the screen shows a choice of all kinds of other fruit and veg, not different kinds of strawberry.

  4. I really hate self service scales.. by tjstork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which is better for me as a customer, having someone in checkout that just grabs my tomatoes and enters the price, bags them, or, a stupid robot that makes me do everything. This technology doesn't benefit me at all, it benefits the store. I refuse to use it.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by tjstork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stores that do this, too, just don't understand that the whole reason people do retail these days is because of the people. A supermarket is a social occasion, and, actually talking to a checkout person for 5 seconds is, well, a human experience. I was loyal to my Wawa (a convenience store) for the longest time largely because the person who worked there took 2 seconds to throw in a sausage egg and cheese into the oven for my wife when they had run out of the ones they'd already made. You can't get that kind of flexibility out of a robot.

      --
      This is my sig.
    2. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TO you it may be a social occasion. For me, its a once weekly annoyance. I want to get in and out as fast as possible, and get on with my life. Anything that shaves time off is appreciated, and these sound like they'd be great when combined with self-checkout lines.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Corbets · · Score: 2, Informative

      here in Switzerland, self service produce weighin is everywhere. People accept without comment, and indeed seem to have nothing against it.

      I suspect these devices will see much broader deployment in Europe than the US.

    4. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No offence, but if going to the supermarket is a social occasion, then you really need to get out more...

    5. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by tibman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like the self-checkout, it's fast and convenient. Kroger's works great, Walmart's isn't that good (i dislike the store a bit too, tbh).

      But the small discount is probably doable if we take the money saved and convert it. Let's say they convert 2 normal lanes into 6 self-checkouts. That removes 1 employee (still need one to oversee the self-checkouts). Let's say 9 US dollars an hour is saved. You could get a discount of 15 cents US per minute. Ah, but wait, there is 6 self-service lanes which means you get 2.5 cents US per minute discount. Hardly worth it, imo.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    6. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by amohat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But can't we use this tech to eliminate those little produce bags?

      Why do I need my apples to be separate from my oranges?

      At home they go into the same fruit bowl. Sometimes the bags are useful and are re-used. Most of the time I have a couple hundred saved up to throw away (no local recycling).

      The bags are mostly for the checkout process. If we can weigh and pay for produce properly, we can cut back on stupid bags.

      The only reason we partition our fruit and veggies before we put them in the final bag to go home is to make it easier for the cashier to handle. A little tech might allow us to try to change such a wasteful and silly cultural shopping habit.

  5. A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know how widespread these are outside the UK, but ever used one of the self-service checkouts that are appearing? Scan item, bag it, scan next item etc...

    Great idea. Except that the whole point is to save time, and these things were clearly never tested by someone in a hurry because it's trivially easy to scan and bag faster than the checkout can keep up. Well, it would be except the damn thing refuses to scan item 2 until item 1 has been bagged and it takes forever to register that item 1 has been bagged.

    They're only faster if the supermarket is full of technophobic customers and the checkouts have a queue going out the door.

    1. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried the self scan in a Delhaize in Belgium ... when you go to pay the girl takes everything out of the bag and scans it again. I don't quite see how doing something twice works out faster.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by RMH101 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Great idea, flawed execution - you're not wrong. Whilst I still use them at my local Tescos, I use them because I take a calculated guess that I can deal with the self-service system and its bugs and short queue quicker than queuing up in the long line at the conventional checkout line.

      I'm usually the guy who's standing there muttering "C'mon, c'mon!" under his breath whilst waiting for the damn thing to recognise that I really have scanned my purchase and placed it on the checkout roller. The annoying thing is you could see how it could be really great - better scanners, faster recognition: swipe, bag, insert card and you're done.
      (Thinking about it, having self-checkout that's a bit of a pain to use unless you're slightly geek-savvy might not be a bad thing - keeps the queues down for us)

      On a related note, to those of you who also buy clothing at supermarkets, bear in mind the self-service tills neither offer to remove the security tag from clothing, nor remind you that there's one present. Happily, there's lots of guides on the internet that'll walk you through removing these things at home using nothing more complex than a butane lighter.

    3. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      I saw one at woolworths here in Melbourne which crashed to a windows desktop. The staff got a bit upset when I started to play with it. It would have been interesting if there were any test or debugging tools floating around. Perhaps I could have "fixed" it for them.

    4. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by drspliff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Please remove your item from the scales"
      WTF.. there's nothing on them
      "Please put your items in the bags to the left"
      I only got a sandwich and a can of coke!
      "Please put your items in the bags to the left"
      *hrmmm*
      "Please remove your item from the scales"
      *cancel*

      I hate those infernal machines!

    5. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by will_die · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is as bad as the old system you saw in alot of Communist countries, seen in Poland, czechoslovakia and Bulgaria.
      There you would go to one person they would select the items you wanted from behind the shelves and place them in a basket, this would then be passed on to the second lady who would then total up your costs and give you a paper listing your total, the basket would then be passed to a third lady who would wrap up your items and place in bags you provided and that would finally be passed to the last lady who was at the door who would take the slip of paper so you could pay then hand you your items.
      All of them were seperated so the lady with the basket would have to walk them over to the next station.

    6. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Communism... gotta love it

      OR ELSE!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. My first real world experience by grungeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just a few days ago when I was shopping with my family at a "real" store (maybe comparable to WalMart in the US) in Potsdam (near Berlin), I was confronted with this kind of scale. The scale looks similar to the standard self service scales, but it sports a touch screen instead of the panel with selection buttons. The camera is also included in the touch sceen.

    After I had placed a clear bag with nectarines on the scale it displayed a number of selections that it considered the appropriate type of fruit. None of the selections came even close, so I had to select "nectarines" manually on the touch sceen.

    Generally this is a nice idea, but it just does not seem to work, maybe also because we always place the fuits in bags before putting them on the scale.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    1. Re:My first real world experience by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should just inject the nectarines with RFID tags when they are packed. As a bonus the customer gets tagged multiple times as well.

  7. Bye bye service industry by damburger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have stopped making things, and now increased automation is rendering the service industry pointless. To be honest, like most of the public, I would rather deal with a machine than another human being, if only because that other human being is inevitably some slack-jawed sack of cynicism and self-loathing who hates their job and thus a large percentage of their existence.

    The economy of western Europe, therefore, is developing into one based entirely on producing reality TV shows and suing people for sharing them on the Internet. Hooray.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Bye bye service industry by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will start using self checkout when they start giving me a discount on my purchase for the money they save on a cashier. Until then I'll keep on using the cashier lines, that is while they still exist.

    2. Re:Bye bye service industry by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And while you're lined up, waiting for some jackass to count out change while the cashier is scanning their dozen coupons, I'll already be out the door.

      But please, keep it up! The more people like you there are, the more likely it is the self-checkout will be open and available. :)

  8. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the whole process does move a lot faster at the checkout when labels are printed in advance

    And that is the whole point. That way they can use less staff there. The process for the customer as a whole takes more time. Often I need to wait for the scale to be free then I need to look for where the selection is. So for the customer it take more time, but the store saves.

    Also I have used supermarkets where you do NOT put a sticker on it. The person at the checkout has a scale in the same place where the scanner is and enters the PLU. This is as fast as scanning, while not having the need to scan them myself. (I can still check if I want to)

    As for people doing the packaging. I have seen it and it takes me again much more time. I do not care what time I spend at the checkout. I care about the time I spend for the whole experience.

    To compare it: I am not interested if you have the fastest computer in the world that does a process 2 seconds faster if I as a user lose 5 seconds by needing more time to enter the data.

    And then there is the self-checkout. The only advantage I see is not so much the speed. It is that they can use one person instead of 4 to man them. The same with the scanners you walk around with yourself.

    OK, the last two might indeed save me about 5 minutes. It will also give me the not so nice feeling that just put some people out of a job, so I can have 5 minutes more to waste on /.

    So I now take my time whenever I go shopping. If somebody runs to get in front of me, I let them. I do NOT use the self-checkout lanes, even if there is nobody there and I do have the technical knowledge.

    To not use the scanners you can use is also because I do not use a customer card. They can not link my stuff I buy to the way I pay. The privacy laws here do not allow it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  9. My girlfriend... by PotatoFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    My girlfriend unwittingly leaned across one of these scales to reach a bag of apples, whereupon the screen started showing pictures of different kinds of melons. Fairly accurate, I'd say.

    --
    "Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power." -- James Madison
  10. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by houghi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because the less that person needs to think/work, the quicker I get out of the store again!

    Untrue. They will not reduce the wait time. They will reduce the staff. So instead of 10 people doing checkout, they will have only 8.
    It will indeed reduce your time at the checkout, but it will not decrease and perhaps even increase your total shopping experience.

    Stores want you as long as possible in their store. It will make you buy more. If you then have a perceived time gain (not a real one) that is even better.

    Obviously the time spend must not be irritating, otherwise it is counterproductive. So they know how long it takers before people will start to get irritated and have moved your time with the girl to a minimum, as people think that time is the most 'wasted' while not decreasing the overal time.

    For some it might take less time for others it might take more time overall. You can be sure that the profit is calculated. If the store would not gain, it would not happen.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  11. Re:From me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it could figure out the type op the tomatoes, it should also be able to recognize the things as tomatoes...

  12. Melons? by RudeIota · · Score: 4, Funny

    My girlfriend unwittingly leaned across one of these scales to reach a bag of apples, whereupon the screen started showing pictures of different kinds of melons

    ... You never removed the bar code from your inflatable life partner? :\

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  13. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Usually stores do have the facility for the check-out person to enter the code and weigh the fruit themselves at the checkout, but as they only do this when tourists come to town (or the OAPs who forget) they don't remember the codes off the top of their heads and have to spend a while looking them up.

    In Australia, it is standard for the "checkout chick" to weigh fruit & veg (or anything else) as part of of the checkout process. The scales are built into the bench/barcode scanner and it takes maybe a second longer than a typical barcode scan.

    (Which resulted in a bit of minor confusion and embarrassment the first time I visited a grocery store in Switzerland after we moved here.)

    Having seen both systems in action, I'm in favour of having it done at the checkout. It doesn't add any meaningful amount of time, is more convenient for the customer and removes the ability for dishonest people to game the system by deliberately using an incorrect label on their goods.

  14. Doomed to Fail by Bazman · · Score: 4, Funny

    My usual lunchtime shop has trouble reading BARCODES on half the stuff I buy. Swipe, nothing, swipe, nothing, swipe, nothing... Type in tiny number, beep. Yeah, that's time saving. And now I'm being told computers can tell the difference between tangerines and satsumas? Heck, I can't even do that!

    I call shenanigans. Either:

      * each vegetable has a secret RFID chip in it
    or
      * the picture is sent to some outsourced call centre where someone sits at a screen watching vegetables all day and clicking on what they are.

    1. Re:Doomed to Fail by dw604 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      B might actually work

    2. Re:Doomed to Fail by slashname3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Amazingly I always get the cheaper one that is displayed. Don't you?

  15. Refuse to use them by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I refuse to use self-service checkouts. They have installed two of them in the local Tesco (occupies the position that Wal-Mart does in the UK market).

    Every time I go in, a clipboard-wielding junior manager tries to make me use them. I usually just say "No", but next time I've resolved to explain why.

    Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs. Two of these things are typically supervised by one worker, instead of requiring two people to man two manual ones. You only spend on capital if you have an expectation of increased quality or reduced labour costs, and I can't see these things increasing quality.

    People who work grocery retail are at the bottom end of the labour market, so where are they going to go? I don't feel comfortable helping the the likes of Tesco line their pockets like this. I'm starting to feel close to the line where I stop shopping there (if only they hadn't managed to crowd out all the local greengrocers and fishmongers, which I suppose is partially my fault).

    1. Re:Refuse to use them by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two of these things are typically supervised by one worker

      In the Tescos I use, it's generally more like 1 worker for 6 or 8 of these, and quite often there's no-one there at all (there is a button you can press to call for assistance).

      I refuse to use them too, for exactly the same reasons - they're taking jobs away from people who can probably work in very few other places. That probably makes me a Luddite; so be it. I'm not opposed to technology, but I am opposed to the relentless effort by most companies to save money, often at the expense of the employees.

      I'm all for increased automation and efficiency and thus increased leisure time, but society just isn't set up to support the people who find themselves with no jobs and no money because of it.

    2. Re:Refuse to use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Since when do we owe these losers jobs? You should have seen the kids at my brother's old school. None of them gave a shit about their GCSEs, despite (because of?) the fact that they were going to be leaving school straight after them. They couldn't be arsed to work and seemed to think that the world owed them a living. I always wonder what percentage will grow up to look back on their GCSE exams and realise that they should have worked harder.

      Most of my friends on the other hand have worked their arses off at top universities but are finding it impossible to get the jobs they wanted because of the credit crunch and companies tightening their belts. Yet you think we should be hiring unskilled wasters instead of the talented people who have worked their whole lives?

      Here's a list of some other things we should therefore get rid of:

      • Automatic traffic lights
      • ATMs
      • Being able to order things online without phoning someone up

      They all reduce employment, right?

      (Posted as AC, as no doubt someone will think rewarding the people who spend time and effort to do well at school over the layabouts is fascism of some sort.)

    3. Re:Refuse to use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disliked them at first, but have now started to like them. Many bugs are now fixed, and if you don't press any screen prompts you don't get the patronising loud voice (just scan the food, insert the money without pressing the screen) and it's great.

      Usually saves me about 5 minutes, rather than having to queue up behind everyone buying cigarettes and lottery tickets.

      Also I've not noticed a reduction in staff in my local tesco express. Before, they often only had one member of staff behind the tills, with a queue of 20 people and 3 staff pointlessly re-arranging the already stocked shelves. Now they still have this scenario, but I just whizz through the self-serve.

    4. Re:Refuse to use them by esme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least in the US, grocery checkout staff are far from the bottom of the labor market. I used to think it had to be the lowest job imaginable, but then there was a major strike of grocery workers in Southern California a few years ago. There was a lot of discussion in the newpapers about their wages, benefits, etc. and it turns out they make decent wages (1.5x to 2x minimum wage) and have good benefits -- they were mostly striking over the details of health insurance. So I was mystified why they were striking, since it seemed like they were getting a fair deal for unskilled work.

      But then the strike dragged on long enough that the stores brought in scabs. It changed my opinion of grocery workers immediately. The scabs were awful -- they didn't know any of the codes for the fruit, so it took them a minute to look up each code. They couldn't bag the groceries properly. They were twice as slow, etc.

      And in the UK, my experience was that the grocery workers were much more competent than in the US. Generally more personable and helpful, like noticing if a package was damaged or letting me know if there was a special two-for-one price.

      -Esme

    5. Re:Refuse to use them by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Yet another instance of the Broken Window Fallacy. Yes, increased efficiency may put these individuals out of a job. But it also means that the grocer saves money, and we do too. That money doesn't just disappear from the economy, we spend it on better things. Maybe we go out to eat more often, and maybe the owner of the grocery can afford to add on to his house now. Those activities create jobs. Efficiency is better for everyone.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Refuse to use them by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Agreed! That's why I refuse to use electric light bulbs. I mean, what are the lamplighters to do if there are no gas lamps to light? Huh?? They're just a way for the city to continue to take my taxes while putting people out of a job!

  16. Self service discount by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Self service discount? Over here we call it shoplifting :).

    --
  17. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by pimpimpim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Depends on the store. In germany they often do it at checkout, also probably at aldi in switzerland. At one particularly annoying store in germany (edeka), you have to type in a 3-digit number at the scale. So you spend a lot of time looking for the place where you got your fruit or vegetable, remembering the number, going back.

    These "smart" scales have been around for more than a year now at some Real,- stores, and if they are supposed to intelligently learn, they are apparently still not doing a very good job. Still, anything beats the number system.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  18. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by jacquesm · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's definitely not 'redundant'.

  19. Re:From me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My friend used to buy only onions. Coca-Cola onions, chicken onions, etc. Instead scanning the barcode he used to put them as loose items. The cheapest ones were onions. So he always had lots of receipts for several kinds of onions. Funny, illegal but saved him quite a lot of cash.

    No he'll need to behave like proper citizen...

  20. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by legirons · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe I could open a shop where every product has approximately the same cost per unit mass, then just charge customers by the kilo.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_store

  21. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by baldass_newbie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you had a hand held device that told you what type of plant you're looking at, you could have names for everything.

    The problem is that no such device exists not because we can't build the device but because there is such a paucity of taxonomists and so many varieties of plant life that we don't really have a bead on how much is out there. If you can't build a database, having an interface for it is useless. Data first.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  22. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by sirambrose · · Score: 3, Informative

    The problem with regular self check registers is that even though they are more compact, the store still never installs enough of them. If I have to wait in line to use a self service register, it doesn't really save me time. On the other hand, my grocery store has a rack of 100 portable self checkout scanners at the entrance. These allow me to scan and bag my groceries as I shop. This is much more efficient than a self service register or even an actual cashier because I don't have to unload my cart at the register. I've never had to wait to get one and I've never had to wait more than a minute to pay when I'm done.

  23. Re:From me by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't stand these systems. I said TomAto. It said ToMato. Then I went and tried to get some PotAtos. It said poTato.

    Then I just called the whole transaction off.

  24. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, because it would be such a disaster for taxonomists if they had a machine that they could point at unfamiliar plant life and press a button that said "Is this in the database".

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  25. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right - and these plants just uproot themselves from the jungles of darkest Peru, randomly arrive in the supemarket and teleport themselves onto the shelves do they?

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  26. Re:From me by GhostChe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Armark has edible rfid out now. My company has been contracting with them to put them in various foodstuffs. http://www.rmark.org/ Not much information on the site, but the tech is pretty cool, and completely foodsafe.

  27. Bad idea by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with self-service scales in the supermarkets I've been to is not that it's hard to enter the item, it's that frequently _the item isn't in the database_. Or the PLU sticker is missing from the item or the shelf tag... and can't be looked up because it demands an exact name match and you don't know whether a sweet Vidalia onion begins with O or V or S.

    The premise that it can recognize produce visually is unlikely to say the least. Do you really think it can tell the difference between bananas at $0.69 a pound and organically grown bananas at $1.19 a pound? How about a Fuji apple and a Gala apple?

    I'm willing to bet that the system does more to impede legitimate purchases than to facilitate them.

    I'm bet that "ask[ing] the customer to choose between only those icons that are relevant" sounds like a smokescreen and a pretext. I'll be these scales really being sold to control-freak store managers who fear that customers are building a better retirement by ringing up expensive orange peppers as cheap green peppers, and is willing to spend $50,000 to prevent a couple of customers a day from bilking the store of $2.67.

  28. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by ubercam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah when I lived in Germany, they always did the weighing at the checkout. I never shopped at the big supermarkets like Real or the super-sized Edekas or Aldis because I lived too far away from the large shopping centres and didn't have a car. I just shopped at the small local stores around the corner. They never really had problems with identifying the produce. If they were unsure they usually referred to a guide with pictures to find the right code. If they still couldn't find it they just asked you or someone else. Didn't take long.

    Same deal in Canada. I can't speak for the whole country, and have no idea how its done anywhere else, but in Winnipeg at the various Superstore locations I've been to, they have about 4-6 self-checkout kiosks which have the computer scales built in, but definitely are not smart whatsoever. Real Human Beings® still exist as cashiers in far greater numbers. Safeway seems to get the idea that people are better. Their recent store renovations (to the darker more luxurious look with wooden floors and all that) don't have any of the self-checkout kiosks at all. Maybe their next round of renos will put everyone out of a job, who knows.

    For bulk purchases, like at Safeway buying a bag of candies or spices from the bulk bins, you still are asked to write down the number on the twist tie, but if you forget, don't worry about it, they can look it up in their guide. Very easy.

    Once in the UK, we tried using the self-checkouts at Tesco and they were the hugest pieces of garbage on earth. The machine supervisor/manager guy basically waited beside us the whole time and constantly had to intervene where the machine screwed up. Double-scanning and not sensing the items in the bagging area were par for the course. Took about 10 minutes extra just to do that while people with full carts who went to the Real Human Beings® after we'd started were already loading their cars before we were finished wasting our lives with relatively few items vs. vastly inferior technology. The least the supervisor/manager could have done was to void everything and take us to a proper cashier to get it done in no time. Hopefully they've fixed those things up by now.

    Moral of the story: go see the Real Human Beings® because they are harder, better, faster, stronger.. well maybe better and faster. Plus you can chat with them, or chat them up as the case may be, not have them talk down at you in some stupid disembodied voice. Human interaction is much more pleasant than interacting with a computer. I know this is Slashdot, and that may not be a universally held view, but it is the truth. Even Slashdotters have to emerge from their dens and get some food sometime...

  29. Bye China, Hello UK! by andersh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact the trend has just started to change again, the transportation prices are rising making it increasingly profitable to produce closer to home.

    Just the other day I read an article from the UK about companies moving manufacturing home from China. And don't forget that the same thing is happening in the US [in some areas].

    And China is experiencing problems with higher labor costs following a real lack of available manpower. People in China are getting picky about what jobs they take and the wages they get.

  30. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by T3Tech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One species' weed is another species' diet.
    Or something like that.

    --
    Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.