Slashdot Mirror


Pitfalls of Automated Bill Payment

theodp writes "A few months ago, the NY Times' Ron Lieber extolled the virtues of allowing utilities, phone, and credit card companies to pull whatever you owe from your bank account. Big mistake. Lieber's readers fired back, telling him he was out of his mind for suggesting that they give billers unfettered access to their credit cards and bank accounts. Now Lieber goes through five of the glitches that can occur with any of the various methods of setting up automatic payments: 'You can give each biller permission to pull the full amount from your bank account. You can use the online bill system at your bank to push payments out automatically each month. Or you can charge every bill to your credit card and give only that card company permission to pull money from your bank account when the credit card bill is due. Each of these methods has its potential shortcomings ...'" What kind of payment automation do you use, and why?

70 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. D'uh by The+Ancients · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's plenty of credit card details that can be bought for $20 on the internet. Problem solved!

    1. Re:D'uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's plenty of credit card details that can be bought for $20 on the internet. Problem solved!

      And you pay the $20 by giving the site you credit card details right?

    2. Re:D'uh by cecil_turtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, I have a dedicated credit card just for bill payments that gets fully paid off each month. It allows the automatic payments to be set up, but acts as a buffer to my bank account in case of an error, plus I get to defer payment for 25 days or whatever. Finally, the credit card I use for this is a cash-back card, so I effectively reduce all of my bills by 1%. Billers that don't support credit card payments I use online banking to send a check. I've been a victim of one of those 38-in-100,000 billing errors, I had a DSL company once withdraw $1,300 instead of $56 because of a "glitch" in their system. If that happened against my bank account it would have been a much larger problem.

  2. It is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I pay all of my bills in Linden Dollars.

  3. Well.. by Entropy98 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as it not AOL or Paypal what is there to worry about?
    --
    Find My IP Address

  4. I use Paytrust by ptbarnett · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.paytrust.com/

    Most of my bills are transmitted electronically. The rest are mailed to Paytrust's P.O. box, and they post the scanned PDF for my review.

    I set the payment rules via their website: pay full amount, pay full amount up to [limit], pay specified amount. Or I can just wait for the notification in my email and pay it myself with a few bill clicks.

    1. Re:I use Paytrust by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't heard of paytrust before, but is it really safe to have a third party looking at your bills?

      --
      Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
    2. Re:I use Paytrust by ptbarnett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I haven't heard of paytrust before, but is it really safe to have a third party looking at your bills?

      Depends on what you are worried about. There's nothing in any of the bills I send to Paytrust that would bother me if it became public knowledge. If someone wants to alert Al Gore because I used too much electricity last month, I'd love the opportunity to laugh and slam my door in his face.

      I pay my credit card with a direct transfer (my checking account and credit card are at same bank), so they don't get that statement. The cool thing about Paytrust is that you can send ANY bill to them, including ones that don't offer automatic payment. And if you want to change the account that is used to pay the bill, you only have to make a change in one place.

    3. Re:I use Paytrust by subreality · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been a PayTrust customer for a long time. I was originally a PayMyBills customer, but the service has been the same even after they were bought out. It works exactly as advertised, and I'm completely satisfied with what they do.

      I use them because I am simply terrible at keeping track of paperwork. I know some people can do it. My mother can't understand why I can't do something that is so easy for her, but I fail miserably when I try. Things stack up, I lose track of which ones I paid with a credit card when they call me to collect the delinquent accounts, and if I want to look through my history, my files were so terrible I'd never find what I needed.

      Then there was PayTrust. I don't think of it as automatic bill payment. Instead, it's an automated filing service, and a check writing service. They receive bills, and file them into various categories for me, keep track of which ones I haven't yet paid, and after I review them and tell them how much to pay, they print and mail a check on my behalf. The few bucks a month they charge much more than covers the late fees I used to incur by losing track of things. Even if it weren't for that, their fee would be worth it for hassle reduction, and for having easy to access, categorized records.

      They have the ability to automatically pay things if you want. I use it for a few small, fixed costs, like my phone bill for the DSL line. My credit cards are set to automatically make a minimum payment before it's due if I haven't reviewed and manually set a payment amount.

      I have had zero problems with their service ever. The fearmongering is completely misplaced, IMO. If I don't tell them to pay an account, they won't. I have full faith in that, because they have always handled it correctly in the past, and have no incentive to try to slime something by. I'm even a privacy nut, but really, there's nothing on my credit card that I care if people know. In a worst case if someone someone stole all their records and published them, they'd find out that I've *gasp* paid for porn a couple times. Bring it... The risk-reward profile is fine.

      OTOH, I would never authorize a phone company to autobill my credit card (pull billing). Phone companies are detestable, soulless, unethical piles of crap, and have not earned the trust to have the responsibility of billing me the same amount every month and not silently try to tack on more services. I completely agree with TFA's criticism of this method.

    4. Re:I use Paytrust by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      >If someone wants to alert Al Gore because I used too much electricity last month, I'd love the opportunity to laugh and slam my door in his face.

      It's not Al Gore, it's the DEA and they also have a copy of that invoice of the 8 600-Watt plant lights you bought 3 months ago.

    5. Re:I use Paytrust by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ha! My automated bill payment system is *much* better, and I've been using it for many years. It validates the bills when they come in, and only pays when they are due. It maintains my account balance and lets me know at any time what my balance is doing and what's coming due. It follows up with creditors with any billing errors, too, and ensures they are corrected. It even balances my checkbook every month.

      The only downside is that it's pretty expensive. Yea, all my bills get paid, but most of my leftover income goes to maintaining the service!

      It's called "my wife".

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    6. Re:I use Paytrust by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ha!

      I used to know a guy (back in the early 14th century, when the planet was newly cooled, and there was no internet etc...) who just let the bills pile up in his hallway. Each month, he would pay just one bill from that pile.

      If anybody objected or sent the bailiffs round, he would simply offer the opportunity to refuse to participate in his lottery, in which case they wouldn't get paid. :-)

      OK, he was a hippie (as was I) but the notion was interesting nonetheless...

    7. Re:I use Paytrust by chunkyq · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lot's a fresh tomatoes. For medicinal use.

  5. I pay online by fishyfool · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But none of them are automatic withdrawals. Every month I take the time to go to the website of the biller in question, and tell them exactly what I want to pay. That way if there's a mistake, It's my mistake. I also have a specific checking account I use for online payments. I only transfer enough to pay what I said I'd pay and not a dime more. Just as a layer of insulation between my checking account and my bill account.

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
    1. Re:I pay online by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I use the "get my ass to the post office method. I'd pay online, but Korea uses an ActiveX plugin instead of SSL. Even if I had ActiveX, there's no way I'd do that.

    2. Re:I pay online by REALMAN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like the way my phone company's website allows me to pay the monthly bill. On the site you set up your "payment wallet" by inputting your credit or debit card details which are saved and then when it's time to pay your bill you just click "pay bill" then a confirmation box and then it's done.

      This method allows me complete control versus auto payments which could cause havoc if the funds aren't in my account on the particular day an auto account would be set to.

      --
      - A Frog in a pond utters an azure cry. -
    3. Re:I pay online by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've seen seven non-Windows machines in four years in this country. They were all owned by foreigners. Four belonged to me.

    4. Re:I pay online by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've seen seven non-Windows machines in four years in this country. They were all owned by foreigners. Four belonged to me.

      Are there any large, English-language websites in Korea? I'd like to visit them in Firefox and then write to the webmasters with the problems I encounter. Having the web OS-neutral will be the first step in solving the problems that you describe. My own country was not too different until about two years ago, and I've been actively contacting webmasters for about five years demanding OS- and Browser-neutral websites.

      I encourage you to write to them as well. If they don't hear from us, they won't know that there is a problem.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:I pay online by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      As far as I know, the government requires the banks to use the ActiveX plugin for banking purposes.

      No, the Korean websites aren't really in English. No one uses Google or Yahoo! here. They have their own search (Naver), e-mail (Hanmail), social networks (Don't remember the name), and even office suite (Hangul Office). If it weren't all based on a foreign OS, I'd actually kind of respect their "independence."

    6. Re:I pay online by hedwards · · Score: 3, Informative

      That would be a cautionary note about impatience. That problem dates back to the period right before SSL was finalized when the South Korean government mandated an ActiveX approach to securing banking connections.

      The official SSL spec came out only about 6 months or so later, but by that time there wasn't really much interest in fixing the error.

      Fast forward to today, and it means that it's basically impossible for non-Windows computers to access those services.

  6. I don't. by Leptok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    End of story. Why give them the access when it takes 10 minutes to simply do it myself?

    1. Re:I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why give them the access when it takes 10 minutes to simply do it myself?

      Because you'll forget and get stung with interest and/or penalty fees?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:I don't. by Bazman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because it's cheaper?

      Over here in the UK some companies give you a discount on your account if you pay by Direct Debit (basically an instruction to your bank to give the company whatever they ask for each month). I say 'discount', of course it's really an extra fee for doing the work yourself. If you pay online with a card you pay extra. I think for my phone company it's an extra GBP4 per quarter.

      Companies over here love Direct Debits. Every bill comes with a 'why not pay by Direct Debit?' leaflet. Sadly there's no tick box for "I really don't trust you". Stories of epic fails with DDs are legion - an extra zero on the bill makes the person go overdrawn, they get a bad credit record, they lose their house, they kill all their family and so on. I exaggerate. Slightly.

      Sometimes I feel I'm the only one not paying by DD, but that's what they want me to feel...

    3. Re:I don't. by Skal+Tura · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because it's cheaper?

      Over here in the UK some companies give you a discount on your account if you pay by Direct Debit (basically an instruction to your bank to give the company whatever they ask for each month). I say 'discount', of course it's really an extra fee for doing the work yourself. If you pay online with a card you pay extra. I think for my phone company it's an extra GBP4 per quarter.

      Companies over here love Direct Debits. Every bill comes with a 'why not pay by Direct Debit?' leaflet. Sadly there's no tick box for "I really don't trust you". Stories of epic fails with DDs are legion - an extra zero on the bill makes the person go overdrawn, they get a bad credit record, they lose their house, they kill all their family and so on. I exaggerate. Slightly.

      Sometimes I feel I'm the only one not paying by DD, but that's what they want me to feel...

      I think there should be a middle road, so that the bills get automatically posted to your bank account, and automatically paid upto X amount with an confirmation email sent automatically to your inbox.

      Those exceeding the amount you could manually go and approve, or if you wish, manually approve every single one. Easier and safer.

      Here in Finland, Direct Debit is rarely used infact, and nothing really happens if you cannot afford the invoice, in the past they tried 4 times on 1 day intervals, each time accrued 2.8euros extra charges.

    4. Re:I don't. by blowdart · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed; and there's a specific guarantee with Direct Debit, a phone call to the bank will get the money back immediately and it's up to the bank to chase the creditor not you. Creditors must warn you in advance if the payment amount changes, in writing, and you can cancel it at any time. Also creditors are vetted (a little) before they get the facility to allow you to setup direct debits.

      The only problem I've had is with electronic DD where you don't need a signature to set it up. I've had a couple of direct debits setup for mobile phones because a cheque book was stolen a few years back; however my bank notifies me in writing every time a new direct debit or standing order is set up so I can check it (ok it's not a useful letter, they send me the reference number for the DD and the reference number for the organisation that set it up; I have to go on-line and review them where I can actually see the name of the organisation, but it's better than nothing.)

    5. Re:I don't. by Dionysus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because you'll forget and get stung with interest and/or penalty fees?

      Which is why I set up payment the same day I get the bill. Basically, I get online notification (usually email) that a bill is due. I log into my bank and set up the payment with the payment happening on the due date. Then forget about it.

      With email notification, I don't delete the email until I set up the payment.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    6. Re:I don't. by b4upoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cost is the real issue. Mailing letters is an expense and every now and then mail gets lost or stolen. With an electronic transfer there may be no cost at all and you save time every month.
                  For those that are really worried it is easy enough to set up two bank accounts such that one transfers just enough money from one account to the other to pay for the monthly transfers. That way the account with the big money is not exposed to anyone but yourself. And you can do your bill paying with savings accounts rather than checking accounts. Check books are a path to disaster as in my neighbor having a check torn out from the back of her book while her car was being cleaned at the car wash.

    7. Re:I don't. by oiron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Calling Ben Franklin...

  7. One-Time Payment by Bardez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every time I log in to any online payable account, they neg me to set up automatic bill payments. But personally, it's worth the half-hour to an hour of my time -once a month- to fill out an online form. Why would I give anyone unfettered access to my money? What if I have some sort of emergency crop up? I have heard numerous times from co-workers how the automatic deduction will roll out way too early (three weeks ahead of schedule at one point), causing overdraft fees that are entirely the deductor's fault. If they fuck up, the corporate machine would take months if not years to settle any kind of litigation in the event that their customer service department does not agree with my claims. I'll do the one-time payments, thanks. I figure it's worth the hour to control when and where I disperse my money.

    --
    Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
  8. Direct debit by BorgDrone · · Score: 5, Informative

    Over here (the netherlands) lots of people use direct debit. It's safe and convenient and it doesn't give anyone unlimited access to anything. If you give permission for a regular direct debit to a company you can at any time cancel this with your bank, you can also undo an automatic withdrawal (within a timeframe of 2 weeks after the withdrawal iirc), no questions asked.

    Also, people rarely use creditcards here, everyone uses direct debit cards, which are secured with a PIN code. Cheques are not used any more. If you need to transfer some money to someone you usually transfer it directly from your account to theirs.

    1. Re:Direct debit by Teun · · Score: 3, Informative
      I can second that, as a matter of fact in most Western European countries it's the bank that protects you against wrongful withdrawals, similar to what a credit card company can do but much cheaper.

      Here in The Netherlands it's mainly the cable company UPC that gets in the news for continuing monthly withdrawals after cancellation of a contract but the banks sort these problems without cost for the individual.

      Last month it was thirty years ago I got a credit card because I experienced the hard way it was a necessity for international travel. To get it (from American Express) my bank needed to mediate and I was the first person with one for this local branch.

      Even then it was the normal thing to do to (fully) pay the credit card off every month by Direct Debit.

      I have never had any interest payments due to a credit card company because of this system, after all, when needed, a bank loan is much cheaper than a CC overdraw.

      In the present age even the credit card is not needed any more, virtually anywhere in the world I can use my bank's debit card to get cash as they are associated with Maestro.

      Cheques are generally not used in The Netherlands as they are not guaranteed and you have to wait up to 14 days to get your money, it is only from the UK or the US that you sometimes see these expensive, worthless and outmoded things coming in, the IBAN system is much more efficient.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  9. Common practice by jasticE · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been common practice in Germany for as long as I remember (or live). If you do notice an illegitimate transfer, you can tell the bank to undo it, at which point it is up to the company again to bug you about the money. I think all in all, it's less hassle to just check whether all deductions are legit than to manually transfer money to your billers.

    1. Re:Common practice by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True.

      My phone/internet company actually wants even a little fee for not using automatic
      debit payment.

  10. Verizon by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had to CLOSE a bank account to keep Verizon out of it. They first drew more then I owed them from it, then after I told them I wanted paper bills that I would pay myself(they also tried to charge me for the bills), and to not auto-pay anymore, they promptly attempted to draw the same amount, found they had no access to it and charged me an insufficient funds charge. I believe that was entirely intentional.

    That was enough for me. Nobody has access to any of my accounts but myself. Not even my wife. That way when I have a charge to my account, I can ask to see my signature on something specifically authorizing it. No signature? Not my problem.

    The hassle of dealing with idiots like that FAR outweighs the convenience of auto-pay.

    1. Re:Verizon by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nobody has access to any of my accounts but myself. Not even my wife.

      I hope you've got things sorted out well for emergencies. Somebody has power of attorney, yes?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:Verizon by Aerynvala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My sister had a similar problem with Verizon, actually. Only closing the account didn't solve it because her credit union re-opened the damn account when Verizon tried to get more money out of it. I don't recall how it was resolved, but it was a huge mess that took months to sort.

      --
      http://transformativeworks.org/
  11. Likewise... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in Canada and pay all of my bills through my bank's web site. As much as people like to rail about the lack of competition in Canada due to the fact that there are only five chartered banks for the entire country (other than credit unions, but they are provincially regulated), all five of the chartered banks offer sophisticated on-line banking (some more sophisticated than others). Hell, I even paid my property tax to the City of Calgary on-line. There is no futzing around with the biller in question and arranging electronic payments, you simply add them to your payee list on your bank's website.

    Now, I could set up automatic bill payments, but I had a bad experience with the Royal Bank and a student loan; that isn't going to happen again.

    1. Re:Likewise... by Tridus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      /agree

      Its a lot easier to dispute a bill when you haven't paid it. Once they have the money, its pretty hard to get it back.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:Likewise... by JustOK · · Score: 2, Informative

      likewise.
      I can receive most bills within the account or still have them sent to my house. Payments are when I make them and for the amount I say.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  12. Firewalls by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You might want to talk to your bank about their policy on overdrafts. I found out, the hard way, that when my checking account had insufficient funds to cover a check I had written, they just took the money from another account I had with the bank. They had never asked me for permission to do that.

    The cause of the problem was a data entry error by the person who reads the amount of the check and prints it on the check with a MICR printer. They got the numbers right but moved the decimal point one place to the right. From there on, everything operated on automatic pilot, with no human intervention until I received my bank statement and spotted the problem. The bank's attitude was that the most efficient way of doing business was to automate all processing and decision-making, fixing any problems after the fact, if a customer complained. I closed all my accounts with that bank, which is now part of Bank of America.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Firewalls by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The best way to deal with these policies, I have found, is to issue a written direction to the bank and hand it to your manager as well as mailing it to the bank's legal services division.

      I have, for example, a written direction on file with my bank that they are to refuse any charges that would overdraft my account, regardless of whether they are preauthorized or not.

      If the bank fails to uphold my explicit written instructions, they become responsible for the results.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
  13. I don't by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I pay my bills online every month. That way I know exactly what I am paying. It's not that hard. The automatic payment thing is scary to me, because it takes control out of my hands. The only bill I pay automatically is my gym membership, because they wouldn't have it any other way. But at least that bill is the same every month.

    I'd hate to pay my power bill automatically because it would have been a total surprise to me last month when it jumped from $50 to $160.

  14. Well by mikkelm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm using automated payment.

    To be honest, I don't see what the fuss is about. If I see a charge I don't agree with, I have it reversed, and confront the billing party, though that's yet to happen. I don't see how anything short of a good portion of cynicism could keep people from using this. I haven't done anything to pay any utility, telco or ISP bill for over a year. Even my rent is handled automatically. Saves me a lot of trouble.

    1. Re:Well by Grave · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not as easy here in the US to have a charge reversed, and if that charge causes you an overdraft fee, you can be really left out to dry in the meantime.

    2. Re:Well by mikkelm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a universal constant that reversing charges has to be difficult, and nor is it that you should incur overdraft fees that aren't reimbursed when a charge is reversed. It's down to the banks to handle the practical implementation in a way that consumers would agree with, but that does nothing to change the evidence suggesting that the concept itself, when properly implemented, is very successful.

    3. Re:Well by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's the potential cost to you of your landlord accidentally withdrawing 10x rent even once?

      Very little - it'd just mean I don't have to worry about rent for most of the next year. That'd be quite nice.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    4. Re:Well by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's the potential cost to you of your landlord accidentally withdrawing 10x rent even once?

      Very little - it'd just mean I don't have to worry about rent for most of the next year. That'd be quite nice.

      Nice for you that you've got enough liquid capital sloshing about that this wouldn't be a problem. Though since it was implicit in the original poster's comment that this *would* be a problem for most people, your answer missed the point- intentionally, I assume, so that you could make a smartass answer that was both smug and pat.

      Anyway, if you're that well off, it'd probably make more financial sense to simply buy the place you're staying in.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Well by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nice for you that you've got enough liquid capital sloshing about that this wouldn't be a problem. Though since it was implicit in the original poster's comment that this *would* be a problem for most people

      I make around 2750 euro a month after tax, of which I can save about 1250 a month, and pay 350 euro a month in rent. Having a spare 3500 to pay 10 months in advance is hardly a big deal. And I do NOT consider myself to be especially well off - I would consider that "most people" are probably in a similar situation. Anyone who does NOT have enough disposable income to afford 10 months rent in advance really needs to find somewhere cheaper to live.

      Anyway, if you're that well off, it'd probably make more financial sense to simply buy the place you're staying in.

      Hmmm... I am in no way interested in buying a crappy little apartment in downtown Hannover.

      your answer missed the point- intentionally, I assume, so that you could make a smartass answer that was both smug and pat.

      No, I did not miss the point - I simply do not accept that "most people" can not afford 10 months of rent.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    6. Re:Well by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I [..] pay 350 euro a month in rent.

      That's very cheap- in plenty of countries/cities there's no way in hell you'd get an apartment for anything like that.

      Having a spare 3500 to pay 10 months in advance is hardly a big deal.

      Really? Not everyone is in the position where they have that much money saved up beforehand. Not everyone lives in a city where they can get a passable apartment for 350 euro a month.

      And even if they did have that money saved up as a "safety buffer", most people would not consider it acceptable that this buffer was gone just because some landlord had fucked up. I mean, seriously, you'd be quite happy if this happened to you?

      And I do NOT consider myself to be especially well off - I would consider that "most people" are probably in a similar situation.

      I would say that you're assuming too much- in particular that everyone is like you.

      Anyone who does NOT have enough disposable income to afford 10 months rent in advance really needs to find somewhere cheaper to live.

      So suppose someone's been looking for a job for some time, their savings have gone down quite a bit, and they finally get one in- say- London, where rent is hideously expensive. They should go live miles away, even if it means that they can't take the job, because they don't happen to have ten months rent (at London rates) in the bank? Yeah, that makes sense.

      Hmmm... I am in no way interested in buying a crappy little apartment in downtown Hannover.

      Which I take to mean that you're living in one? So given the choice, you'd rather pay rent on one- money down the drain- than own it, and then sell it later on?

      No, I did not miss the point - I simply do not accept that "most people" can not afford 10 months of rent.

      Then you didn't think things through very well.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  15. It's done everywhere else, so why not in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since I moved out of the US, I have paid all my bills online. Outdated methods of paying bills with paper checks do not exist here, like in the US. I've been paying bills online for years now and have never even once had a single issue. And I've never heard of anyone having problems here either, outside of single time when a fake bank website was set up and caught a few people. Anyone with even a remote knowledge of the web would have known it was a fake site though and it was shut down pretty quickly.

    I don't get this whole anti-online payment mentality in the US. As long as your bank has the proper security in place, there is no issue. I would not hesitate to say that more fraud occurs giving CC numbers over the phone or sending payments through the mail.

  16. What kind of payment automation to use? by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    None, for several reasons.

    1) Billing errors occur. Don't allow them to take your money until you've verified the bill is correct. Otherwise, even if they correct the bill, you will never, ever get a refund.

    2) Balance errors occur. Most banks will slap you for a $30-$40 NSF fee if someone sends an ACH debit transaction that's in excess of your available funds, whether or not they actually pay the ACH. Further, many banks play games about how fast they credit ACH deposits (like your direct deposited paycheck), or regular deposits (like your paper paycheck), in an effort to increase the likelihood you'll have an overdraft. What's more, when you swipe your debit card at a merchant, they can place a hold on your funds even if the final charge isn't anywhere close to the actual transaction amount. (Example: Buy $20 in gas at your local pump and find they "authorized" your card for $75. The bank holds the $75 for anywhere from 3 to 30 days. If you try to spend any of the $55 difference, they slap you with an overdraft fee because the funds were not "available," even though they're still "yours.")

    3) Emergencies occur. If I need to take my kid to the ER and shell a large amount of money so that he'll have an eye tomorrow, I shouldn't have to call the electric company to get them to stop the payment so I can do it.

    Most banks allow online bill payment, and many don't even charge a fee to use it. The good ones will even present my remembered vendors in a list, and allow me to simply enter the amount I want to pay, the date I want to pay, and click "send." Automatic payment benefits only the vendors and the banks, never the customer. I do not exist for a company's benefit; they exist for mine. Just because they prefer to swipe my account on the due date doesn't mean it's to my benefit to let them. They can take a paper check (or a CheckFree deposit) when I'm damned well good and ready to send it to them, and not a day before.

    --
    Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
    1. Re:What kind of payment automation to use? by isorox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3) Emergencies occur. If I need to take my kid to the ER and shell a large amount of money so that he'll have an eye tomorrow, I shouldn't have to call the electric company to get them to stop the payment so I can do it.

      What kind of a fucked up country do you live in?

  17. I did this once and stopped it the first month by HomerJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I moved into my last apartment I decided to do the auto bill pay. I'm just lazy with paying things and sometimes I'll forget to pay something.

    Well, for those of you that pay a gas bill, you know they bill you an "estimated" rate, and then the actual the next month. Well, for a small apartment who's gas bill was maybe $20 for a month, they decided to take out a $320 "estimated" payment. They had no idea why it was so out of whack with the actual, but it was what it was. Normally you just send in an "estimated" payment as well, they just readjust your bill, and send you the actual the next month. Well, with the automatic payment, the bill said $320, and that's what they took.

    It ended up just being that I told them to keep $320, and I just wasn't going to pay my bill for like 18 months. Which was fine with them. But they never actually fixed the estimation. The next bill, I had a $300 credit, following I owed $300, next month I had a $280 credit, etc. etc.

    Long story short, you don't know what these people are going to charge you with. They take money first, and then just deal with you later if you don't like it. I'd rather pay a late fee, than deal with a CSR rep on why they took too much money.

  18. Interesting update... by fortunato · · Score: 4, Informative

    My favorite part, if you've RTFA to the very end, is this:

    UPDATE In last weeks column on socially responsible investing, I mentioned an exchange-traded fund called the HealthShares Emerging Cancer Fund. What I failed to notice, because the company hadnt bothered informing potential investors on the funds own home page, was that the day before my deadline the company announced it was shutting down the fund in September.

    Now here is someone you should definitely listen to.

  19. Automated payments destroy jobs by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of mine told me that many of her colleagues at work have lost their jobs as a result of automated payment systems. And she's fearing her job might be next. She's a debt collector.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Automated payments destroy jobs by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this is bad how? I'm sure buggy-whip and horseshoe makers bemoaned the loss of their jobs with the advent of that new-fangled motorcar gadget. I'm sure those debt collectors can adapt.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  20. Own bank's bill-pay system by LoadWB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use my own bank's bill-pay system, because they take all responsibility. If it says a check is to be to my electric company by the 15th and it isn't, THE BANK calls the electric company and explains the situation, then deposits any late fees into my account.

    In the past using my billers' systems has been a nightmare or two.

    One double-billed me one month and would not refund the second billing because my next bill would be due by the time the return would process. The bank could not reverse the charge because the payment came in with my authorization.

    I've had more than one bill me too early.

    And recently my cell phone bill was over $500 in error two months in a row because of a missing billing code on my data plan. All sorts of fecal matter would have hit the fan if those payments had been automatically debited.

    And other incidents of which I cannot recall the details.

    Unless the biller is willing to take responsibility for errors on its end and IMMEDIATELY return money taken in error, as well as cover whatever fees or damages are incurred due to the error, payments come via bank bill-pay only. And if that is not acceptable, then the account gets closed and I move on.

  21. How is it done abroad? by atomico · · Score: 2, Informative

    It might be of some help to know how is it handled in other countries...
    Where I live (Spain), direct debit has been the rule since long ago: almost everybody does it this way. Utilities (electricity, telephony, gas, mobile phone), insurance, mortgage, all charge your bank account monthly or bimonthly. It is convenient (especially for them) and problems are not too common, although they exist. But then you can dispute the charges or go to the consumer protection office.
    Banks try to push you to do it this way: most of them only let you pay your bills only one hour per day (for example, from 10 am to 11 am only).

    My personal take on all this: I like it this way. As I said before, problems are rare; it is far more usual to know someone that has had his credit card number stolen than to know a case of having trouble with direct debit. And to have something less to care about is worth it. Anyway, most of the time the bill gets to you by mail two or three weeks before the charge is made, so you can check it and have some time to fix the problems (good luck with that though).
    Overdrafts are allowed, but they are easy to avoid. Actually, banks like so much this system that they will equate having this kind of automated bill payment with being a regular, good customer: in most "fidelization" promotions, they ask you to have two or three bills paid through them.

  22. More Paytrust info - LOTS OF DETAILS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was an early adopter with Paytust (back when they were PayMybills.com). They were bought out by Intuit. I'm still with them today. Here's why:

    BORING: Yes, you can do the simple bill payments that you can do with many bank accounts now. You can send a check to a name or an address for a certain amount, perhaps against a specific account number. They'll put everything together and mail out the payment for you.

    EXCITING: What makes this service shine is bill RECEIVING. You got bills that come to your house? You change your billing address. You give them a special PO BOX # that is provided with your account. Paytrust will scan the bill in as PDF format. They'll pre-populate the bill's data into your account, matching it with one of your known billers, and doing the data entry for the minimum amount due, the total amount due, and the due date.

    In my case, I still micromanage. I get an email from them saying that some new bills came in (and provides the basic details of the bill that I just mentioned). So, most of the heavy lifting is done for you so that when it comes time to pay the bill, it is just 'click a checkbox', 'click a button', and 'click a button to confirm'.

    You can set up autopayment rules (which I haven't done) to auto-pay a bill if it is under a certain amount, or to pay off the full balance, or pay against the minimum due, or whatever. I know that they've got some flexibility there.

    They're got some added protection for detecting duplicate bills (more than 1 bill in a billing cycle), and also, more importantly, the 'missing bill', to let you know that normally you receive a monthly bill from a company, but nothing ever came.

    ORGANIZING: If you read between the lines to see the net effect of all of this, here it is. Basically, I log onto their website. The main screen tells me the bills that I have yet to pay. The bills that I have paid will drop of of that screen. So I instantly know, at any given time, what has or hasn't been paid. Which is so useful to me, I haven't had a late payment on anything since I adopted their service. That has contributed to my credit score reaching a very nice level (and my avoiding late penalties, and punitive APR increases).

    RESEARCH/HISTORY: A scan (again, PDF) is kept online for a year (after which, they offer archival CDROMS. So you can go back and, say, figure out when a charge was put on, or when you interest rate changed, or how much electricity you used a year ago. Totally worth its weight in gold in doing the kind of research that only the most organized freak could do before.

    You've also got a good summary screen of every payment you've ever made through the system, so you can find out, say, what were the last 10 payments I made to Chase?

    Small unexpected but appreciated service: if my credit card company sends me a credit card, or I get a really weird non-bill letter (that isn't spam), they'll forward it to my real address.

    So, I hope I don't come across as a shill for these guys, but I'm absolutely a great fan. Their service has really saved me so much time, money, and frustration over the years. One of the best kept secrets of the web, IMHO.

    1. Re:More Paytrust info - LOTS OF DETAILS by llamalad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I started with PayMyBills. I abandoned them and switched to Paytrust after PayMyBills got behind on processing incoming bills and were making late payments.

      Yep. I used paymybills.com too, and loved them- right up until my car insurance got canceled because they didn't process my bills for two months. It was a really great situation, because, not being bills, they also didn't 'process' the cancellation warnings and notices that they surely received. I really like the idea of 'outsourcing' bill paying but I don't trust anyone to manage it properly except myself.

    2. Re:More Paytrust info - LOTS OF DETAILS by whoop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Their page says they will cover things if their service is late. Did you take that up with them? Looking at the service (and several raves people give it here), I'd be curious how well they handle problems like that.

    3. Re:More Paytrust info - LOTS OF DETAILS by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really like the idea of 'outsourcing' bill paying but I don't trust anyone to manage it properly except myself.

      It's certainly not "fire and forget". I monitor bill payments with a calendar in Quicken, and reconcile my checking account automatically (online) a couple of times a week. So, I recognize a missing payment before it becomes a problem, and make a manual payment if necessary.

      Since moving to Paytrust, the problems has always been the biller. At one point, a company actually cut off my service for non-payment, and it was Paytrust that provided the proof that the bill was paid via EFT.

  23. Re:Shows why Slashdot is too Americocentric by KGIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh we know but this is a primarily American site. That's like going to America and then complaining that we're too American. Your point would (is, really) valid on sites like theregister.co.uk but not here. Not all sites on the internet are going to cater to your whims, you can create your own or find a more local site if you want. That is the beauty of the web.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  24. BPay by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Australia has a system called BPay, which has been almost universally adopted across banks, and most large billers. It comes in two parts:

    BPay: Your bills come with a bpay ID, and an account number. You can log into your bank's online system, and issue a payment to that ID and account numbers. Most banks will also allow you to schedule future or recurring payments.

    BPay View: Via your bank's online service, you request that this account be registered for BPay View. You provide your billing information, and the account is registered. That biller can now issue bills to your account. They're not paid automatically, but you can login to your bank's online system and pay them. Alternatively, you can instruct your bank to pay them on their due date, when they're received, or a fixed number of days after they're received. Most banks will email you when you get a new bill.

    This is the system I use, whenever possible. I get an email whenever a bill arrives, telling me how much it's for. It will be automatically paid on it's due date, but I can log in at any time to stop or defer payment. All money is handled by the banks, not via any third party. Because all major Australian banks have standardized on BPay, I'm not tied to any of them in particular.

    It's easy and convenient, and I really can't find any problems with it at all.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  25. The fact is, US banking is backward by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Speaking as someone who has been a local director of a US corporation and then a general manager in a company with a US subsidiary, the biggest issues are simply that US banks are technically backward compared to Europe, and that you have no Data Protection Act.

    In the US it has been made very easy to set up a bank -with the result that many people, some with fraudulent intentions, do just that. (At the other end of the scale I know of a small community of professional people that set up its own bank just because they didn't trust the big ones, and it was very successful. I am not suggesting that Americans are less honest than Europeans, that is far from the truth.) In Europe the banking system has deep roots in the Jewish community becaue Jews were discriminated against - they could not own land but were allowed to charge interest - and this tension has created what is, on the whole, a very successful and honest banking system. (In fact in the UK banks were also started by nonconformists like Quakers for much the same reason - Barclays being an example.)

    The result is that until the madness of the last ten years our banking system was very trustworthy and we were prepared to believe in direct debit systems - which on the whole work very well. Meanwhile in the US banks were still settling interbank transfers with bits of paper, and this is still an issue today - in Chicago we had to set up an account with a subsidiary of the (British) NatWest just to avoid ludicrous delays and overcharging for simple transactions. This is ultimately because in the UK many bankers knew they were less than honest, and so were not inclined to trust other banks. The present credit crisis is because, after years of unregulated credit and junk assets, banks have discovered once again that they cannot trust one another. Paypal is an example of a system that was set up to deal with what is really a US problem, not a general problem.

    The answer to direct debits is to make the system as robust as European systems - which make the person asking for the money extremely liable if they make a mistake. But this is unlikely to happen, because US law favours corporations over individuals. And, given Obama's choice of running mate and his connections, voting either way in November won't have any effect.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:The fact is, US banking is backward by Peeteriz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the reasons for the European situation are not because EU banks behave better - it's because of heavy-handed intervention from the governments to protect consumers.

      All these benefits of EU Direct Debit system(s) that make it good for the customer (instantly reverse payments weeks after they have been debited, authorisation requirements, fee and float limits) are not due to goodwill, but due to requirements set by initiatives such as EU Payment Service Directive and SEPA. The situation would me much more in favor of the billing companies' and bank fee-income (like in USA) if it were driven purely by free market.

  26. Re:It's done everywhere else, so why not in the US by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you use automated payment, if the system fucks up, you'll personally spend hours upon hours on the telephone with said company trying to get the insanity dealt with. "No, no that's not what our system says here sir, the amount we deducted from your account is US$45.97" "But you deducted US$495.70!" "No sir that is not what our system says". It will take days, if not weeks, to get things straightened out.

    That's the problem with your system, right there. Here's how it works in the UK:

    (Call utility company)
    "You charged me £495.70"
    "No, we charged you £45.97"
    "Refund me £495.70 now, or I'll get my bank to take it back from you.

    (In the unlikely event that they refuse, call bank)
    "I've been overcharged on a direct debit. Can you refund it for me?"
    "Certainly. What's your account number?"

    It'll take ten minutes to deal with, maximum.

    Yes, this has happened to me.

  27. Trust by Noctris · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess it's all about trust. I too use Direct Debt (Belgium) for most of my important uttilities (water, electric, phone, gas)... But we have many different options. For example: most uttilitie companies just direct debt a fix amount you have agreeded with them when closing your contract (for example $ 120 a month).. every 6 months they send you an "update" with a calculation of your real usage and give you the money you payed too much back OR send you the bill for the remaining amount (can be direct debt too if you want).. this way, the suprises are kept at an absolute minimum.. For the few errors i have heared about, it always was corrected very soon and honest ( as in: putting your money back on the date they took it off so you don't loose your interests..

    For less known companies which you doubt.. you can use electronic billing where you see the bill on your electronic banking, can quickly check the details and pay it with 1 click.. Then again.. i've never hearded horror stories about getting the money from different accounts if you don't have enough money on the original one.. if the funds are insufficient, the direct debt just bounces like a cheque and that's it.

    Standing on both sides of the line ( my company also uses direct debt to get our money from the customer).. i can tell you it is a time saver for us AND , more important.. get's us the money in time.. if you want to pay manual, there is an extra fee attached to it simply because 90% of our B2B customers simply pay late.. not enough to ask for interessts but enough to be painfull for a startup.. (taking 35 days instead of 28).. we often really need our cash to pay our own bills.. and it turns into a spiral at the end.. our customers pay late so we have to pay late ...

    What i wanted to add about The Netherlands ( since we do business there too).. They have an extra motivation to do things right.. I a company bills wrong a couple of times , their right to direct debt can be revoked by the bank until they sort out the problem.. now if you are a company in the Netherlands with a couple of thousand customers and you screw up a couple of times.. you'll be very sorry to notice that all of a sudden, you have to bill all these customers manually and try to get your money from them... believe me that this is a REAL motivator to check your process and your code 20 times before using it in production...

  28. A myth about "third parties" by Jay+L · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There seems to be a common assumption, even here on Slashdot, that your money is somehow safer if you don't entrust it to a third party (such as a bill payment service). A few months ago, I was talking about check fraud with someone who doesn't do any online banking at all. I asked him if he writes checks, and he said "Only to the electric company!"

    I don't know about you guys, but I haven't audited my electric company's processes lately. Anybody here know the name of the person at NStar/ConEd/etc that opens the mail? Anybody sure if the mail is even opened by an employee, or if it's contracted out to a vendor of theirs? Do they even do the data entry locally, or do they throw it in a scanner and have the data entry done offshore, like radiology labs do?

    I don't see any reason to think that writing a physical check to the electric company is any less secure than doing it online, where I have a reasonable assumption that at least it's not going to go through human hands for payment processing. (Unless, of course, that online payment becomes a laser check, which then is subject to all the same vulnerabilities.)

    Summary: I think you generally have no way of knowing if your payment method is secure or not. I just assume it probably is, and that I have legal recourse if I'm wrong.

  29. I use a wide mix, cashless by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a regular visa and mastercard that I rarely use. I also have a visa debit card from my bank, I have cheques, and I have a payal account.

    Most of my utilities are auto pay. They are either bound to my visa debit card or to my checking account. Things like the monthly power bill, internet service, and local phone bill. They used to mail me a statement but I've gotten most of them to emailing me my statements now since my mailbox mysteriously loses mail occasionally. Failure to receive bills in the mail was the primary reason I tried to get everything to electronic.

    Some of my bills such as long distance and insurance do not offer direct payment, and half of them mail me a bill, the other half email me a notice to go to their web page to view my month's statement. For those I use my bank's "billpay" feature. I login to my bank web page and tell the bank who and how much to cut checks for. They keep the payee lists so I don't have to hunt down addresses or account numbers ever, and because I have opted for electronic statements instead of mailing me mine, my billpay service is totally free. I was expecting to occasionally have problems with a creditor losing a payment since it's not 100% the way they are expecting the checks to come in, or to have someone auto pay the wrong ammount, but in the last five years not a single problem has come up. Also, some of my bank's billpay are actually electronic transfers, because my bank participates in some sort of electronic payment network and has a lot of the big ones in the list. In either case, I don't even pay for a stamp.

    Online purchases I do with my visa/debit card (as visa) or paypal. I avoid paypal unless necessary because the deductions on the statement say paypal and don't tell which vendor that payment went to, and I have a notoriously short memory on these things. Paypal is linked to my bank account and immediately directly deducts for purchases.

    I try to use cash as sparingly as possible, and it's taken me a couple years to get proficient at it. I used to take out $20-60 every payday. Now I actually occasionally deposit cash and almost never withdraw it. And by this I mean I also don't just run to the ATM every time I need cash for a purchase. People that are always saying "I need to run to the ATM quick" need to get with the program. I use my visa/debit card for everything. I track my spending with a spreadsheet that contains my bank register back to 1995. Each entry is marked into one of a dozen categories, and allows me to see exactly where my money is going. There's a summary sheet that keeps track of stats. Entertainment, transportation, utility, home improvement, etc. I can tell you to the dollar how much I spent on gas or groceries this year or how much my heating bill went up over last year, etc. All possible because I don't use cash and have all those visa/debit receipts.

    I've never been auto billed wrong, but I have had my visa/debit card hit twice by accident on half a dozen occasions. UPS, quickstar (gas), and mcdonalds several times, which is the only hassel I've had to deal with as a result of being cashless. UPS was the only one that requires me to take my printed statement into them to credit for the double charge, all the others merely required a phonecall. Looking at it from the other side of the fence, how many times have you been shorted on change when paying for cash? Do you really count it each time? I'm sure you've been shorted several times and you'll never know it. I know no one's gotten away with cheating me. So I think cashless is actually the safer way to go.

    And I use on average a dozen checks a year. My bank is a credit union, has free everything, and pays me dividends on my balance in checking and savings. I don't see why anyone uses regular (non credit union) banks.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.