Slashdot Mirror


The Google Navy

theodp writes "Is Google preparing to launch its own Navy? In its just-published application for a patent on the Water-Based Data Center, Google envisions a world where 'computing centers are located on a ship or ships, which are then anchored in a water body from which energy from natural motion of the water may be captured, and turned into electricity and/or pumping power for cooling pumps to carry heat away from computers in the data center.' And you thought The Onion was joking when it reported on Google's Fleet of Naval Warships!"

44 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. Cooling by Uglypug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Very good idea from a cooling point of view I suppose, the a/c bills for a big datacenter can be huge. But enough to offset the cost of operating an entire ship..?

    1. Re:Cooling by chasingsol · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Add to that wave power, custom built ships just for this purpose anchored in place, fiber connection to the mainland and it may well prove to be cheaper over the long term than a land-based air conditioned building that requires lots of power. Air conditioning is a huge part of the long term cost of a datacenter, using water cooling with abundant supplies of water seems like a very green way of doing things.

    2. Re:Cooling by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention that there's no property tax (being taxed to occupy real estate), if the local business or economic climate goes bad you can pick up and be towed to a different location, and you can always add more units if demand increases. The one problem I see is pirates. No, seriously - you anchor one of these away from an area patrolled by a decent navy/coast guard, and I can see someone paying you a visit late one night to haul away equipment...

    3. Re:Cooling by nategoose · · Score: 5, Funny

      Google Earth sees the pirates before they get close. I'm not sure what Google Boat does then, but it may involve ninjas.

    4. Re:Cooling by Venik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Russia's "Bazalt" naval weapons manufacturer recently proposed arming commercial vessels with automatic grenade launchers to deter pirates. There is an idea for Google! They can start with grenades and later upgrade to anti-ship missiles. Or just build an aircraft carrier and save on future operating costs and upgrades :)

    5. Re:Cooling by andrikos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or just patrolling sharks with mounted lasers!

    6. Re:Cooling by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Having served on a Navy ship I can point out a few problems:

      First, sea water temperatures vary greatly depending on the part of the world you're operating in. It's not uncommon for surface sea water temps to be in the 85F(30C)+ range for most areas where you're likely to moor a ship. The AC units that we used were barely able to keep the small server room that I ran cool under those conditions.

      Second, the motion of the ship caused premature drive failures due to the pitch and roll of the ship. This could be alleviated with solid state drives, but that's a bit off for a data center at the moment.

      Lastly, bandwidth and latency are problematic. Sure, Google could just buy a satellite, but they can't modify the 2000ms latency. Depending on ship size and sea conditions, keeping a satellite lock may be an issue as well due to roll.

      All I can really say to Google is, good luck with all that!

    7. Re:Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      somehow you think that it won't pollute the area that it is in?

      remember that heat can be considered pollution as well.

      i live close to San Onofre nuclear power plant, and the hot discharge from the plant has completely changed the flora and fauna along that section of the coast.

    8. Re:Cooling by DuctTape · · Score: 4, Funny

      Google Earth sees the pirates before they get close. I'm not sure what Google Boat does then, but it may involve ninjas.

      Ahem... that would be Google Ninjas(TM).

      ... but they're still in beta.

      DT

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    9. Re:Cooling by Doctor+Morbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the energy to power the data center comes from fossil fuels then it wouldn't matter whether it was located on land or on the ocean. The same amount of heating would occur. If they wind up using wave, solar and wind power to provide power to the oceanic data center then there would be no net increase in warming. Not only that but the oceanic data center powered by green power would reduce demand on the local power grid in a city. Using cold sea water to cool the equipment is far more efficient than using AC.

      --
      If I disagree with you it's because you are wrong.
    10. Re:Cooling by Molochi · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's unpossible. More pirates would cause a corresponding drop in global climate temperature.

      Ramen.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    11. Re:Cooling by ctetc007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, powering the data center using tidal power would be taking energy out of the ocean. While the water cooling would be dumping energy back into the ocean, it will be dumping in less energy than was taken out, so there should actually be a net cooling of the ocean.

    12. Re:Cooling by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Ahem...that would be Google Ninjas(TM)....but they're still in beta"

      Ahem...that would be Google Grasshoppers(TM).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  2. Hey everyone they're GREEN! by Adambomb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now focus on that apart from the fact that it would also allow them to shift the jurisdiction of their operations when laws change in specific regions.

    Hell, fill them with enough guns and they could just put them in international waters. If any of these are launched, shall we start the pool on how long until the "Google fighting Piracy" joke headlines?

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Hey everyone they're GREEN! by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell, fill them with enough guns and they could just put them in international waters.

      That's one long fiber-optic cord you are proposing. Somehow I doubt people would put up with satellite's latency.

    2. Re:Hey everyone they're GREEN! by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ohhhh the year was 1778

      How i wish i was in sherbrooke nowwww.

      A letter of marque came from the king for the scummiest vessel i'd ever seen!

      wait ... Topic....

      True but government sanction piracy would have to consist of smaller forces to maintain plausible deniability. The kind of piracy you're describing is the kind i can see getting it's ass kicked if google hired a security force with the kind of revenue they'd have to be making to justify these kinds of ships to begin with.

      The only question after that would be when it becomes profitable to do so despite considering those costs.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  3. Isn't that bad for electronics? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google envisions a world where 'computing centers are located on a ship or ships

    My father-in-law worked as a linesman for AT&T about 30 years at a beach town in southern New Jersey. He told me that they had to replace electrnoic components almost twice as quickly as more inland areas because of the more corrosive saltwater air.

    If this is a real effect, I imagine that it will be difficult to prevent on a ship in the ocean.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Isn't that bad for electronics? by the_womble · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Computers can go in a matter of months in a location really close to the sea.

      On the other hand, I know people, in the town I have just moved to, who live only tens of meters from the sea who have had no problems - but they have a massive rampart between them and the sea that (I think) blocks the spray.

      Ships are going to be tricky but designs meant to keep salt spray out may be workable.

    2. Re:Isn't that bad for electronics? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt Google cares, they throw away any servers older than 3 years or so (dead or not).

    3. Re:Isn't that bad for electronics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [citation needed]

    4. Re:Isn't that bad for electronics? by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google datacenters are pretty much disposable today. Build it once, run it for X years, then dump the entire thing. Repairs are less and less useful.

      Each rack could be an independently sealed bubble (airtight) with a few wires coming out the top for power and network connectivity, then hang the entire rack into a flooded compartment of the boat -- say a catamaran with a protective mesh bottom.

      With cooling requirements taken care of, powering the computers becomes quite a bit easier.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    5. Re:Isn't that bad for electronics? by barzok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ships are going to be tricky but designs meant to keep salt spray out may be workable.

      It's not like the US Navy, every cruise line, and countless shipbuilders haven't ever put a computer on a seagoing vessel before.

      "May be workable"? I'd say it's been solved many times over.

    6. Re:Isn't that bad for electronics? by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Navy isn't comparing the costs of those computers to computers in a data center somewhere on land.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  4. SS Google by escay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    are these going to be stationed more than 12 nautical miles away from the coast? 'cause, you know, then they wouldn't be under US jurisdiction.

    1. Re:SS Google by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off, you're exactly right that compared to many many countries, America is not THAT bad. Also, you're exactly right that the reason the US receives so much focus is the fact that America has been a huge influence on the world at large this past century or so.

      What saddens me is America used to be a place that believed in certain values as being sacrosanct and would fight to the death to defend those values. The americans at those times would follow their values regardless of what was thought of them or how it compared to other countries. It's sad to see that giving way to the apathy of "at least better than the worst".

      Comparing your achievements to your goals is the only metric worth having. Comparing your achievements to the achievements of others is the beginning of the path to obscurity.

      Basically, ever since vietnam america has backpedaled from the original ideals to a state of doing just enough to still be considered good while doing anything possible to reach the desired goals. Many people like to blame Bush for the current state of american foreign policy and corporate/environmental policies but the seeds of this began way back spanning both sides. The democrats slowly degenerated into nanny-statists and the republicans seems to have shifted to a complete opposite of the original states-rights conservatives where they want a monolithic powerful executive branch.

      On the plus side though, the way america is arranged this can always change again. This is exactly because certain atrocities are still impossible within america and certain liberties are available that are not available in all other countries.

      I'm glad the founding fathers had ink though, at least that can keep people fighting against the more ridiculous of interpretations or even downright ignoring of the constitution. Obviously i'm not american myself, although i have lived there about as long as i've lived here in canada overall so i think i have a pretty good picture of the kinds of mindsets exist in new england, maryland, and colorado at least.

      Please note that with the generalizations concerning political parties, I'm only meaning that they seem that way >51%. There are always exceptions.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Old aircraft carriers would work by Nyckname · · Score: 4, Funny

    But there's the matter of pizza delivery.

    1. Re:Old aircraft carriers would work by barista · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure they'll listen to Reason.

    2. Re:Old aircraft carriers would work by TimothyDavis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am sure that Uncle Enzo can get a pizza out to your aircraft carrier.

  7. This gives a whole new meaning to offshoring by colinmcnamara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In all seriousness, there may be interesting tax implications if these datacenters are put outside of US waters.

    --
    Colin McNamara - CCIE #18233 "The difficult we do immediately, the impossible just takes a little longer"
  8. Google Earth? by Smivs · · Score: 4, Funny

    So presumably these ships will connect through a series of Google-Sats in geo-stationary orbits, linking to a Google-hub in each country. And behold, Google shall inherit the Earth. Thankfully, a network of Microsoft terrorists will be able to track then using Virtual Earth and infect the servers with Windows, thus rendering them useless and saving us all.

  9. Not only will your data be logged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It will be water logged!

  10. Re:Okay, it's a neat idea ... by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Google (or Microsoft, or Apple, or..) doesn't patent every single idea they come up with now, someone else will sue them for it later on. If you were sued as often as Google, you'd learn to CYA every chance you could get. Such insanity is the price of doing business in the USA.

    So owning patents (frivolous or not) is neutral. Releasing patents to the public is good. Suing others over frivolous patents is evil.

    Google may not be doing "good", but they're still following their mantra.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  11. GoogleWay by newr00tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    No.

    GoogleBoat will GoogleFloat to a (Google)Safe (Google)Location.

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  12. Re:how is using sea water for cooling cool??? by iknowcss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So far this is the only comment that asks the first question that popped into my head. That heat does have to go somewhere.

    --
    Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
  13. Re:More reason? by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think they can manage 12 nano meters

  14. Re:Okay, it's a neat idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but patenting it? WTF?

    Sorry, Google, but the patent really doesn't fit with "don't be evil." Do you guys remember that phrase?

    even worse, it's a submarine patent!

  15. Heat pollution by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ocean-water-cooling would just move the heat pollution of data centers from an urban area to the ocean. I am not sure that is an improvement. Substantial temperature changes have major effects on ocean microecosystems.

  16. I, for one, welcome... by rdwald · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But seriously, am I the only one who sees an inevitable path from "offshore datacenters" to "cyberpunk future where major corporations like Google declare sovereignty"?

  17. They're not the first ... by miller60 · · Score: 2, Informative

    A San Francisco startup is working on a fleet of data centers on cargo ships, as discussed here on Slashdot earlier this year..

  18. Right Direction maybe better idea by WillRobinson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Point taken on water temp, security and connections. Why not just have a submersible barge, and drop down to the ocean floor.

    Makes it easy to moor. Fiber just lays on the ocean floor. Improved Security, and the water will be much cooler. Sort of a barge made like a giant heatsink. Mount the processors to the hull.

    When the barge looses enough hardware, just raise it back up, service it and drop it back down.

    Also reduced problems with being pitched around causing lost disk drives. Hurricanes? No problem.

  19. Re:Overreaching? by Singularitarian2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every company dies. But not every company truly lives.

  20. Ripe for *real* piracy by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like easy pickings for a band of real pirates.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  21. A patent means.... nada. the math by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Something like 99.4% of patents never make a cent.

    This one is particularly loopy.

    Let's do the math. Let's say Google buys the Queen Mary. 80,000 tons. Let's say they anchor it someplace with an average wave height of 20 feet, wave period of 10 seconds. Raising 80,000 tons at 2 feet per second takes about 160,000 horsepower. Hmmm, that's very close to the original steaming capacity of the QM. In watts, that's about 120 megawatts, about ten times more than you'd need if you packed the ship with servers. Okay, so that looks easily doable.

    Problem is, buying the electricity would be much cheaper. 12 megawatts will cost you about $700 an hour. Can you run and maintain and pay on the principal and pay salaries and insurance on $700/hour? No, not a couple of powers of ten.