Slashdot Mirror


PGP Leads Corporate Efforts To Save Bletchley Park

blake182 writes "CNET reports that PGP, together with IBM and other technology firms, is mounting a fundraising effort to benefit the ailing Bletchley Park, home of the Station X codebreaking efforts in World War II. 'We're calling attention (to the fact that) Bletchley is falling into disrepair, and that, probably, the world owes a debt of gratitude to that place,' said Phil Dunkelberger, chief executive of PGP."

83 comments

  1. Dunkelberger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's Dunkin' Donuts answer to the Hamburgler, right?

    1. Re:Dunkelberger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, wtf?! That's funny! C'mon mods!

  2. WWII by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 3, Informative

    We owe lots of stuff to lots of things from the second world war. Nice to see corporations like this getting involved; then again, this is part of PGP's history.

    1. Re:WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. IBM were instrumental in the holocaust.

    2. Re:WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      its f**king disgusting that this Labour "tax and spend" government will happily blow huge amount of cash in useless hair brained scheemes in order to move further and further left but wont spend a tiny fraction of it to preserve a huge piece of world history. Brown should hang for thing alone

    3. Re:WWII by digitig · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe the GP thinks they've gone so far to the right that they're wrapping around.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    4. Re:WWII by psychodelicacy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't know who modded this offtopic, but they're probably not British. The parent makes a valid point, though perhaps the rhetoric is a little excessive! The fact that Bletchley is neglected while the government spends huge amounts of money on pointless projects (Google "Millennium Dome" for an example) shows a lack of interest in history. Bletchley gives us a welcome chance to celebrate something that shortened the war, rather than the usual glorification of bombs and weaponry. It's a history, maths, science and computing lesson all rolled into one, and the fact that the British government can't be bothered to save it is pretty disgraceful.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    5. Re:WWII by psychodelicacy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate to say it, considering the Godwinism, but the parent's right. It's pretty ironic that IBM should be putting in to save Bletchley, when during the war they were directly involved with Nazi Germany.

      "Offtopic" is not the same as "I'm annoyed by this comment"...

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    6. Re:WWII by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps they're still embarrassed by the Alan Turing fiasco, and don't want to ever bring it up again?

      Seriously, there's no reason to ignore this chapter in their history. It was certainly one of Britain's finest, and this from a country that prides themselves on their many fine contributions to history.

      --
      John
    7. Re:WWII by bugeaterr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps they're still embarrassed by the Alan Turing fiasco, and don't want to ever bring it up again?

      I think you've nailed it there.
      Bletchly Park was the best British minds triumphing over the the best German minds.
      Why else would they want to bury it, but for shame of Turing's treatment?

      Every time this comes up, I am compelled to recommend The Code Book by Simon Singh.
      It has a gripping account of Turing's life and the cracking of Enigma.

    8. Re:WWII by Candid88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the problem is that a lot of people not interested in computer science or cryptography view Bletchly Park as just another one of the thousands of military installations Britain utilised during World War 2.

      The estate itself is relatively unremarkable compared to many in the area and has always had structural problems (it was actually soon to be demolished before war broke out and the code-breakers were stationed there).

      I have been to Bletchly Park and it is a great place, I've heard they even have a full reconstruction of the Colossus computer there now.

    9. Re:WWII by psychodelicacy · · Score: 1

      They do - it's amazing. I was there a couple of weeks ago. The guy who maintains the Colossus gave me a used valve from it. It's beautiful, and now one of my prized possessions :)

      One of the biggest problems the place has is the lack of interactivity. They need to restructure and reorganise, and get things for people (especially kids) to play with. The experience is great if you're already a bit nerdy, but I can imagine for younger children it's quite boring when it could be made absolutely fascinating with a bit of work.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    10. Re:WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time this comes up, I am compelled to recommend The Code Book by Simon Singh.
      It has a gripping account of Turing's life and the cracking of Enigma.

      An excellent recommendation, I've read it twice and it's a superb book on the history of cryptography - it covers the most important milestones beginning with the Caesar cipher all the way to PGP, and the Enigma chapter is one of the best. It does explain basic fundamentals of cryptography (mechanical ciphers like Enigma, mono and poly-alphabetic substitution, book ciphers etc.) but it's main focus is on historical events and the evolution of cryptography (you will not find source code in this book because it's for laymen and history buffs - not programmers).

    11. Re:WWII by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Every time this comes up, I am compelled to recommend The Code Book by Simon Singh.
      It has a gripping account of Turing's life ...

      Not actually read that book, but I've heard well of it and of Simon Singh's writing in general.

      and the cracking of Enigma.

      ... which was done in the late 1930s by a group of Polish cryptographers who smuggled it to the west before the war.

      Just setting the record a little straighter, and not denigrating the work of Station X in the slightest. I've put my money where my mouth is - individual "Friend of Bletchley Park" # 3508.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. How much? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read the Slashdot summary, the entire news.com article, the second article in the news.com article linked from the first article and I still don't know how much they need.

    But at least I know that there's a problem and two separate foundations have turned them down for grant money. I guess that's a start.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      little enough that Big Blue could see them clear for a decade out of petty cash.

    2. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's no price-tag because this isn't the sort of thing you buy off a store shelf. The first thing they'll need is a budget to do is a museum-grade architectural survey.

      Have you seen Bletchley Park? It's not just the main building but the remaining temporary WW2 structures.
      http://www.digibarn.com/collections/locations/bletchley-park/bletchlypark-l-lewin/index.html

      The survey can produce a series of restoration & upkeep senarios, based on how much activity & cost can be devoted over what periods of time, and how much each year of delay will add to the costs and losses. Till that (expensive) survey is done, no one can quote remotely realistic figures.

      Another detail: when I was a renovation carpenter it was a firm requirement that any time a project required a wall to be opened, the client MUST have 60% over budget in the bank to deal with unpleasant surprises. Most of the houses I dealt with were less than 100 years old. Even houses built in the 60s regularly had surprise structural problems. About three of those required immediate work that was a good deal more than 60%.

      Getting a complex like Bletchley Park surveyed and a reliable maintenance schedule put in place is going to be a major work in itself. Then the costs and compromises (yes, the sheds will probably have to be let go. or replaced by replicas.) are going to be frankly enormous compared to what the place can draw in revenue. No wonder the usual sources have shied away. A serious influx of cash from special-interest groups as proposed is really the only chance the place has of getting to a (still expensive) maintainable state.

    3. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our friends at Auntie say £7m (~$14m)

    4. Re:How much? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      They need £7million (that's around $14million in funny money). Apparently IBM and PGP have donated $100,000 which will help, but is a fraction of what they need.

      Bletchley Park is well worth visiting. I've been twice recently with friends, as we couldn't see it all in just one day.

  4. Good by Vertana · · Score: 1

    I'm glad that they're helping out. It's not about the war... but keeping history alive. Especially being about the history of computing with it being /. and all (naturally).

    --
    "The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec^2" -Marcus Dolengo
  5. Pretty Good Privacy Corporation by m3j00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some reason that name for a business just cracks me up. Or have they re-tooled the acronym to something like Pervasive Grid Privacy to sound more 'industrial strength'?

    1. Re:Pretty Good Privacy Corporation by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People will forget the expansion, like for 3M Corp. and SUN.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
  6. Gates Foundation Said No by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 2, Informative
    According to Wikipedia:

    In May 2008 it was announced that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation turned down a request for funds because the foundation only funds Internet-based technology projects.

    --
    /...
    1. Re:Gates Foundation Said No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Oh, so this is an opportunity to vilify Bill Gates? What, because he's rich, he needs to fund every single cause that comes begging with its hand out? Get real, playa hatah.

  7. Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Cordath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IBM was merrily outfitting the Nazis with equipment to help them manage their concentration camps (completely ignorant of their application, naturally) while Bletchley park was breaking Nazi codes. I wouldn't be surprised if, at the time, IBM was viewed as an adversary or, at the very least, completely untrustworthy.

    IBM's future would be built on top of key advances made at Bletchley Park, but they probably didn't know BP even existed at the time. BP, on the other hand, probably wouldn't have pissed on IBM to put out a fire. So the upshot is that, now that BP is irrelevant to IBM's future, IBM is offering aid to them, but back when BP was laying the foundation for IBM's future, IBM was completely oblivious to their existence. On top of that, had IBM known what was going on at BP and tried to invest in their own future, BP wouldn't have *wanted* anything to do with IBM!

    Somebody at IBM really appreciates irony.

    1. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by thermian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And? There was a lot of this going on, not just IBM. Coca Cola invented Fanta so they could continue to sell soft drinks in the European market during the War, Nissan were working with Nazi Germany to build their own V1/2 rockets. There are no doubt more examples.

      Businesses do this, that's because they are businesses, not governments. To be frank, they probably realise that more than a few wars are started for less than honest reasons, and they likely see no reason to stop doing what they do because of it.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    2. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IBM was merrily outfitting the Nazis with equipment to help them manage their concentration camps (completely ignorant of their application, naturally) while Bletchley park was breaking Nazi codes.

      It was also manufacturing M1 rifles for the Allies. (Along with such companies as Rockola - the jukebox maker - and Saginaw Steering Gear. It's handy to convert a factory to guns when it already has equipment for drilling holes the long way down several feet of steel rod and other machines for building small and complicated devices composed of mechanical moving parts.)

      (Back when I was buying an old M1 carbine for participating in the Civilian Marksmanship Program training I picked an IBM-branded one just out of nostalgia. The rangemaster was impressed when I qualified with a carbine, rather than a full-length M1, on the first try. Shorter barrels make for less accuracy. B-) But I could have used a Field Engineer: While the steel parts worked fine, the wooden barrel cover kept popping off during recoil. B-( )

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just misdirection, they are trying to keep the Forbin Project secret.

      "There is another system." Hopefully still fictional.

    4. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nissan were working with Nazi Germany to build their own V1/2 rockets.

      That would be Nissan the Japanese company, based in a country which was allied with Nazi Germany?

    5. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You misunderstand the mentality of little minds :-) :
      In the little mind, IBM=USA=bad. Nissan=Japan=victims of atomic attack by evil U.S.

      Little minds don't comprehend reality or facts, just left wing propaganda. Critical thought has been conditioned out. (Bell rings, college students protest reality.)

    6. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by nbert · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Coca Cola invented Fanta so they could continue to sell soft drinks in the European market during the War

      Today when two countries are fighting it is most certain that Coca-Cola is present on both sides. Somehow nobody has a problem with that - it's not common sense that selling soft-drinks to the enemy is going to hurt anyone.

      Nevertheless I agree that IBM's role in WWII is not particularly evil. Hollerith punch cards were on the market since 1928 and were used for all kinds of legitimate administrative purposes. Since the public on both sides fighting was mostly unaware of the holocaust until around '43 (in Germany sometimes even '45) it is not very realistic to assume that IBM was knowing about the purpose of orders from nazi-Germany before the US entered the war. And after the US joined the war they can't be held accountable because the German subsidiary DEHOMAG got expropriated.
      Given the unique efficiency and cruelty of this genocide I even doubt they could have foreseen it.

    7. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny

      Working with their allies? Ruthless bastards...

      rj

    8. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by stimpleton · · Score: 1


      No. It was this guy!

      nissan.com

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    9. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nissan were working with Nazi Germany to build their own V1/2 rockets

      Damn, those nips miniaturize everything!

    10. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Coca Cola invented Fanta so they could continue to sell soft drinks in the European market during the War

      Not exactly. The company's german arm, isolated from the american one, invented it to keep the plant in operation during the war, when they could not get the Coca Cola syrup.

      * http://xroads.virginia.edu/~class/coke/coke2.html
      * http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/fanta.asp

    11. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Perf · · Score: 1

      Or the manufacturers of the famous Nissan huts?

      Canadians, always playing both sides.
      /sarc

    12. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by psychodelicacy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you underestimate. The book "IBM and the Holocaust" details how the CEO of IBM was closely involved with Nazi Germany, even receiving a medal. These systems were not off the shelf, but custom-built for the Nazis' needs. After the war, when everyone was aware what had happened in the concentration camps, IBM insisted on recovering its profits from the machines used at the camps. They have subsequently refused to apologise for the company's role.

      And just because the allies did nothing to stop the holocaust, that doesn't mean that it wasn't being reported. It was known about, especially at higher levels, but generally ignored.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    13. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Steve+Hosgood · · Score: 1, Informative

      The American arm of IBM was probably prohibited from "trading with the enemy" from the point that the USA entered the war.

      As for BP - they had a big punched-card data centre (The Freebornery) in hut 7, equipped with the sorters, collators, duplicating punches and tabulators typical of any big 1930's office automation effort. Much of this would have been IBM equipment, the rest was from ICT in Letchworth, the same company that built the Bombes.

      BP's "Freebornery" played a vital role in running Banburismus against German naval traffic from 1941 to 1943.

      IBM and ICT equipment were crucial to BP. When, after the war was over, it was discovered that the nazis had IBM equipment too, I doubt anyone batted an eyelid. Were US soldiers outraged to find "IBM PC"s (with Intel or AMD processors inside) in Saddam Hussein's offices? I doubt it.

    14. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Bletchley Park somewhat as secretive as the Manhattan Project. Why would IBM know of its existence?

    15. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by thermian · · Score: 1

      Actually that's what I was referring to, only I worded it badly.

      I knew it was done because they needed a new product to sell to keep things going during the war years, and there were no Nazi affiliations. I didn't say Nazi though, I said Germany.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    16. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      As well as the point about Nissan being in a country that was Germany's ally, I also think there's a difference between making weapons for the army (which is something that both sides are doing in a war, it's kind of necessary), and helping out with concentration camps.

      Indeed, I would consider that sort of thing to be unethical even if it was a German/Japanese company.

      And am I missing some fundamental point about the evils of Fanta?

    17. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually IBM knew what was going on. They had on-site service contracts for the machines and many contracts with the US headquarters. IBM didn't sell machines to the nazis only, it leased them.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkoM8RB-kJ0

    18. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Philip+Shaw · · Score: 1

      Who built the American-made high-speed bombes? Some were built by the Post Office telephone engineers (as were most of the early British models) in Britain, but many were outsourced to the USA.

      --
      "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."- Winston Churchill
    19. Re:Ah... The irony of IBM helping Bletchley Park. by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      You forgot Coca Cola, the American company, based in a country which fought against Nazi Germany :-P

  8. the big problem by thermian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do they have so few visitors? Because the site is presented in what I have to say is a very boring fashion. Yes, I have been there.

    If you know your history, and if you can carry your own commentary round in your head, then it rocks seeing a place that's so important historically, but if not then its not even slightly appealing as a location for a day trip.

    When I was there I saw a lot of extremely bored kids. If they'd added in some enthusiastic guides with a flair for storytelling they would have been able to draw on enough information to keep those kids engaged, but there was only a very sedate and, to be honest, bland, tour on offer.

    I'm not denying that its important to preserve this historical location, but what they really need is to make it more interesting to visitors.

    Historical importance alone is not enough, it has to be fun too if they want to survive as a tourist location.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:the big problem by expatriot · · Score: 5, Informative

      I went there recently and I really loved it. My wife however was very bored. She found it more interesting however when there were speakers talking about the history.

      I preferred the really techy stuff - particularly seeing electronic commponents that I worked with when I first started making electronic projects. Unfortunately for me (but fortunately for the exibits) you could not touch them. Probably a good thing otherwise I might have been taking the Bombe apart to get a better idea how it worked.

      Perhaps they need different color coded streams:
      Children, young geeks, wives (or non-geek husbands), old farts.

      I hope they get funding sorted. This place is real history. More than almost any castle or birthplace tourist "adventure".

    2. Re:the big problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I visited 5 years ago it was very good lots of good collections and several museums, ,also re-enactors
      acting as guides.

      I think the management of the place were to blame, they lost the good will of volunteers and wanted to
      make cash for themselves. The husband of one of the directors was a property developer, so the site has been driven into the ground so it can be scalped for new housing, and offices.
      It really should have been a Nation Trust site
      and saved for the nation

      I did vist last year and its not as good as it was
      when the volunteers were there.
      The place only got opened because of volunteers re-building the tunny and Colossus. Their achievement is super and worth the vvisit just for that.

    3. Re:the big problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was there last year and loved it! I loved all the old hardware and particularly the fact that (a) a lot of it was fully functional and (b) the people who work there were both knowledgeable and happy to chat. The working collossus replica alone was worth the visit. So much better than the average museum, where all you get is a static display of not actually working hardware, essentially no technical information to explain it, and possibly some tediously predictable mock-up of what people might have been doing and/or wearing around said equipment. Yawn.

      But I will admit that I'm a computer geek, a hardware geek, and an antique electronics hobbyist, so I'm not your typical tourist.

    4. Re:the big problem by DeusExMachinae · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am a crypto buff who happened to be in London last month, and took the train up to visit Bletchley Park, all a-quiver to see the rebuilt Bombe and the Colossus. The park is really just a architecturally-Frankensteined mansion and a collection of "huts" with a few exhibits of crypto equipment and wartime memorabilia. It was bloody fascinating to see all the equipment up close, albeit behind glass. The equipment was simultaneously clever and primitive and bulky. The huts were so rude and tiny! Imagine all those people doing the anxious codebreaking work in such environs back then. I don't want the experience of visiting BP to be Disneyfied, but the cramped, amateurish presentation was a bit of a letdown.

      Bletchley Park is not an amusement park. By that, I mean it is not as casually approachable as carnival rides and cotton candy. You'd have to be interested in some aspect of Bletchley to even seek it out. (BP is more than an hour's train ride outside of London, and the casual London tourist/resident is bombarded with advertisements for a buttload of attractive venues to visit, many of them historically important or beautiful or great fun, or all of the above.) This means the target demographic for BP is going to be relatively small. Unless you are into history or cryptography, you probably would prefer to hang out outside Buckingham Palace with the rest of the tourists and watch the guys with them fuzzy hats march around. (There were thousands of tourists ambling by Buckingham Palace one afternoon, compared to the trickle of visitors to Bletchley.)

      But subject matter aside, I agree with thermian that the exhibits are badly in need of better presentation and preservation. If you have made the effort to visit Bletchley Park, you want to be engaged. There are guided tours, but they seem awfully bland. I wandered around at my own pace with a map and one of those audio tour headset thingys. One hut was packed full of wartime comms equipment from various nations, but without much background or other info to accompany each item. I approached the tiny wizened docent soldering something in the corner and he was semi-informative. Lucky I visited on the one day of the week that this hut was open to visitors.

      However, it looked like they were setting up a new exhibit in one of the other huts, so maybe things are improving.

    5. Re:the big problem by plover · · Score: 1

      For the opposite experience, if you ever get the chance, take a tour of the United States' Cryptologic Museum, just outside of Fort Meade and the NSA's headquarters.

      My wife and I received a personal tour from one of the docents that had retired from the NSA (and was old enough to have been there at its founding.) While there was certainly a lot he couldn't tell us, the parts he could were absolutely enthralling to both of us. (And my wife's neither a crypto geek nor a history buff -- he was simply an outstanding guide.)

      The last time I was in England I noticed most British historical sites were staffed by volunteers who work basically for tips. Perhaps changing their pay scale would help attract qualified tour guides?

      --
      John
    6. Re:the big problem by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The last time I was in England I noticed most British historical sites were staffed by volunteers who work basically for tips. Perhaps changing their pay scale would help attract qualified tour guides?

      That's because of the National Trust which is a typically British hybrid of charity/monopoly/collection of mostly retired amateurs. It owns most 'historical' stuff and you're right the staff they get are not too bright.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:the big problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was fairly lucky to be working for a place that had wartime german enigmas and spent a lunchtime playing with them. I had a go with a "Kommander" 3 wheel variant and of course, first thing I did was to type L L L L L L L L L L ... to check out the big flaw in the enigma.

      One thing that impressed me was that even during wartime, the germans really engineered and made the unit well - even the little lamps to light up the letters were slightly frosted so that a soldier in the mud on the russian front could unwind the lamp carefully to replace it. It weighed a lot and was in a beautifully constructed wooden case.

      The wheels could be taken out and replaced - and I'm reasonably sure that they compatible with the 4-wheeled versions and the navy version. (a lesson we've still not learned with computer software) All the wheels fitted snugly - even after 60 years. Even the paintwork was good.

      Every Enigma seemed to have some amazing back story of how it was recovered and brought home - I believe the Navy Enigmas at Bletchley Park have the stories all documented so that visitors can see how people gave their lives to break the code.

    8. Re:the big problem by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      They do have guides, or at least they did two years ago. I was shown around by one of the women who worked there during the war as a bombe operator.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    9. Re:the big problem by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Why do they have so few visitors? Because the site is presented in what I have to say is a very boring fashion. Yes, I have been there.

      I would have to say that perhaps the reason it is so boring is that the very buildings were designed to look boring, so the germans wouldn't think anything military was going on there. I would love to tour Bletchley Park with the audio book version of Cryptonomicon playing on my headphones. Why don't they let Neal Stephenson write the tour? That would seriously rock.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    10. Re:the big problem by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      I agree. I was there recently with friends and we loved it, because we knew some of the history and understood what we were looking at. In fact, we went twice because we didn't get to see everything the first time. My wife refused to come along with us and she would have been really bored if she had.
      I'd guess that the majority of schoolkids wouldn't really be that interested either, though a few might.

  9. Use it as location for Indy III and half! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This way the site will be saved AND we will not see another Indy-against-the-Russians film. Plus, maybe, maybe, it would erase Indy IV from our memory. I would pay for that. A lot.

  10. We can help as well by fyoder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Consider purchasing a pocket enigma, or making a donation (link from their home page or as part of order).

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  11. The Independent has a campaign already by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    The British newspaper The Independent started a campaign to save Betchley Park on 20 August 2008. I wonder if these are connected ?

    Sounds like a great cause - it should definitely be preserved.

    1. Re:The Independent has a campaign already by Lincolnshire+Poacher · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The British newspaper The Independent started a campaign to save Betchley Park on 20 August 2008.

      On 29 May 2008 a friend started a petition on the Downing Street site to shame the Government into acting to save this element of World history. It is now the sixth largest petition on the site with over 14,000 signatures:

      http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/BletchleyPark/

      If you are a UK citizen please consider taking five minutes to sign the petition. Since it was started we have seen a lot of media interest in this topic and BP report that donations via their web site are increasing.

      Credit to MK News which originally broke this story back in May.

    2. Re:The Independent has a campaign already by dmcgk · · Score: 1

      It's probably a bad sign that to get into the top ten we only needed 10 thousand signatories.

      For most of the time the petition has been live we've been equal standing in the public consciousness with Making Brucey A Sir.

      Current number one is angrily demanding that an event occurs which was always going to occur anyway.

      It got half a million signatures. Talk about national priorities...

  12. Oh the shame of it .... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Insightful
    as a Brit I feel ashamed that we can let something like this rot. If it had been an arts museum there would have been an outcry in the press, but something technical and the lovies in the media don't understand and their eyes glaze over.

    Little point in asking the govt for funding - they are too busy pouring cash into a 3 week sports festival in 2012 -- a complete waste of money.

    1. Re:Oh the shame of it .... by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      There *is* an outcry in the press. The Independent started a 'Save Bletchley Park' campaign and the BBC news website (news.bbc.co.uk) has been full of articles about it this summer.

  13. So let me get this straight by Daimanta · · Score: 0

    A company who provides security by cryptography is trying to maintain a monument to an organisation that tried to break crypto?

    I laughed.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:So let me get this straight by FridgeFreezer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Coding & cracking go hand in hand though, unless you can crack codes you can't work out how to make them more secure.

      I'll also add that it's a national disgrace that such an important site can be ignored in favour of arts projects.

      Bletchley Park not only paved the way for computing and helped win WW2 but also helped the telecoms industry in the hands of the Post Office, which became Post Office telephones, which became British Telecom. Thousands of engineers who built the UK's telephone network trained there.

      --
      There is no music - home taping killed it.
    2. Re:So let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try: a company who makes money through computing is trying to maintain a monument to an organisation that practically invented computing.

    3. Re:So let me get this straight by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Then we privatised British Telecom, and turned it into just another big company which exists only to take as much of our money as it can, while providing as little service as it can get away with.

    4. Re:So let me get this straight by FridgeFreezer · · Score: 1

      Have you been reading our mission statement? That was supposed to be encrypted! They used a popular modern cipher called "management" to encode it into incomprehensible babble.

      --
      There is no music - home taping killed it.
  14. Concentration Camp Contributers FTW!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone forget that IBM was running tracking systems for the Nazis during the war effort?

    IBM and the Holocaust

    "Although IBM actively worked with the Hitler regime from its inception in 1933 to its demise in 1945, IBM has asserted that since their German subsidiary came under temporary receivership by the Nazi authorities from 1941 to 1945, the main company was not responsible for its role in the latter years of the holocaust.[23] Shortly after the war, the company worked aggressively to recover the profits made from the many Hollerith departments in the concentration camps, the printing of millions of punchcards used to keep track of the prisoners, the custom-built punchcard systems, and its servicing of the Extermination through labour program. The company also paid its employees special bonuses based on high sales volume to the Nazis and collaborator regimes. As in many corporate cases, when the US entered the war, the Third Reich left in place the original IBM managers who continued their contacts via Geneva, thus company activities continued without interruption."

    Re-elect Blue Chip IBM in 1984!!!

  15. Good that they werent next to University of Dayton by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...as they demolished a historical building after railroading about every obstacle in town, and putting some remains in an obscure spot.

    Had Bletchley Park been in the US(and next to the named university), they'd have let a local university just roll the town over and demolish it after buying the land from NCR for $1.

    It's a shame that PGP, IBM, and friends couldn't have come sooner to save NCR's Building 26.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  16. The BCS and the national trust should be involved. by GuruBob · · Score: 0

    The British Computer Society, GCHQ (if they aren't to PR adverse!) and ultimately the National Trust should be involved.
    --
    It is a site of National Significance and should be preserved.

    --
    Facebook is a woodpecker tapping on the skull of Humanity, Forever.
  17. They also served... by actionbastard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who only decrypted Nazi radio traffic. Those people at Bletchley Park who spent untold hours decoding fragments of Nazi radio traffic probably saved hundreds, if not thousands, of Allied lives. To allow such a place to fall into the state of disrepair that Bletchley Park is currently in, is completely disrespectful to the sacrifice that those who served there made.

    --
    Sig this!
  18. Re:There are lots of things worth remembering... by plover · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll feed the troll.

    VR sims are nowhere near ready for prime time. If the best we've got is exemplified by a 360 degree quicktime tour of a house like on most realty sites, there's no reason to bother at all. Those blow like a $2 Bangkok streetwalker.

    If you're going to take that particular attitude, at least make an effort to preserve it until decent virtualization recording equipment exists.

    --
    John
  19. Re:There are lots of things worth remembering... by Mike610544 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What constitutes "important" and "worth saving" is a matter of nostalgia and self-aggrandizing for those who engage in it.

    I don't know about "worth saving" but it's hard to overstate how "important" that location is historically. Not only did the work done there have a major effect on the outcome of the war (those U-Boats weren't screwing around,) but they also built a lot of the foundations of computer science and engineering that stand to this day.

    --
    ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
  20. Re:There are lots of things worth remembering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed, it seems like a really shoddy place and it would be best to go on tour with the pieces or donate them to a museum. Best just give it to the Smithsonian but they might want to keep it in their country.
    Many WW2 structures are being left to fall apart and will not be repaired, even many of the beach landing defense structures are crumbling.

  21. PGP owes Bletchly Park more than you might think by jonwil · · Score: 1

    The portions of the international arms control treaties of the postwar era dealing with encryption (the same ones that Phil Zimmerman violated when he first released PGP to the world) came about because the allies saw firsthand how encryption can change the face of war (and how they need to make sure that the new breed of computer based encryption was something THEY had but the bad guys did not)

  22. PGP's site is up now by blake182 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The PGP page for the effort wasn't up yet when the CNET story broke, but it is now. More information there.

  23. IBM is rich, so... by michaelleung · · Score: 1

    But isn't IBM rich enough to buy place thirty times over? Mounting a fundraising effort when you can just fund it yourself seems silly.

  24. The privatization of intelligence history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The preservation of iconic history is one of the most important cultural and institutional tasks that the intelligence community can perform to ensure the continued relevance of its traditions as an intellectual pursuit among the generations of professions which follow. A shadowed profession needs more than most the few tangible symbols of what it is we stand for, what we have accomplished, and what we ought to emulate â" if not in strict form or function, than in spirit and ideal. It is these few tokens (and their stories) â" whether the odd item somehow passed down from those that were there, or the unique place which by virtue of the accidents of geography and function became key to a major program or structure â" that also help to cement a shared vision of an increasingly distributed profession.

    Many IC leaders agree to this principle in theory. Yet when the heart of the World War II cryptanalytic effort at Bletchley Park was left to decay, the international intelligence community of the Allied powers paid little attention. Of course, this is not a new problem, but efforts to preserve the history of intelligence have ranked low on the priority list in the face of unprecedented wartime demands coupled with the critical need to re-capitalized aging operational infrastructure neglected during the lean years of the 1990â(TM)s. And while some might say this is strictly a British problem, the long history of the special relationship â" and particularly the key role played by shared signals intelligence efforts in creating that relationship â" dictates American concern (and like concern for the rest of the Five Eyes partners).

    Thus we find privatization emerging in a new and unexpected manner.....

    http://kentsimperative.blogspot.com/2008/09/privatization-of-intelligence-history.html

  25. Just 5 minutes down the road from me... by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

    ...is Bletchley Park, though currently they are in need of funding to stop it going to ruin.

    --
    http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/