Slashdot Mirror
Online Storage With a Twist
mssmss writes "For a long time, I have been looking for a way to securely store my files online without being tied to a single vendor — whose survival my storage depends on. It looks like Wuala has a way to do this, according to this story in the Economist. They use donated disk space of users to scatter your encrypted files over multiple computers."
I don't think I want to be liable for the data that someone puts on my PC should the encryption ever be broken.
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
RTFA There is redundancy for just that reason.
Now that I've read that one, can you send the link for getting rid of mental images?
Encrypted distributed donated storage sounds a lot like Freenet. :)
It's a pity, a truly distributed system could certainly be built, and it would look similar in many respects to this one. I suppose Wuala has no real incentive to build a system that doesn't need them, though.
He didn't ask if there was redundancy. He asked if there was "enough" redundancy. How many nodes going down does it take before the system/data is crippled?
yvan eht nioj
And when the master server that knows where all those little pieces are goes down, you are still without your data.
Thank you! What do we have for our winner?
When I started reading TFS I assumed it was going to be some kind of distributed free storage service, that simply stores a copy of each file on multiple free online storage sites. As far as I'm concerned, this instead rates last after single service with a good backup plan and backing it up yourself. /vertisement much?
Open up a Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail account and cc them all on an email with your files compressed/encrypted as an attachment.
And wouldn't kiddie pron collectors love this technology?
You could say the same about almost every technology. Full disk encryption, digital cameras, the entire internet itself, all this makes the life of a child pornographer that much easier. Focus on the good uses of a technology, and let law enforcement do its job if someone misuses it.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
I concur, and I further assert that backup storage may be one of those things that just doesn't fit into a distributed model nicely. Having several physical copies of the data is 1000 times safer than several online copies, or parts of copies, any or all of which could be wiped out by the same affliction even if in different physical locations by virtue of the network that connects them.
stuff |
Must be nice to have family members for whom "ssh account" isn't a foreign language.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
1/100th of a mpeg or a jpg file depending on the file size is more than enough to show some underage girl getting nailed by a horse. Such formats can also be read without a file header by most software they can be viewed with.
You can't take the sky from me.
that sorta defeats the purpose of having a shared online storage network. if everyone wanted to have total control over the space they donate, then instead of having one large public pool of online storage to be shared by everyone, you'd just have a bunch of small fragmented storage spaces or a bunch of disconnected groups of 5-6 people sharing a few gigabytes of storage. if that's the case then you might as well just call up a few of your friends and ask each other to hold onto your files for you.
the point of Wuala is so that they let you store whatever you want on the space they donate, and you let others do the same. it seems like a fair trade to me. obviously, if you don't want to share your disk space with strangers, then this service isn't for you. just build a RAID array.
Oh man, I wish the world had more people with your mentality. (IE: Don't pretend to be the highway patrol and pull in front of that speeder, get out of the way and let the patrol make their own money.) I'm being serious here. People don't know enough about how other people live in order to make life decisions for them. The same goes for government oversight of my life (you know... things like health care)
Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Don't even have to be that drastic... what happens when the user with part of your contents decides to leave the system, sell his computer, reformat his hard drive?
Will they be mirroring your data? If so that means my stuff will be on twice as many computers... yeah, thanks but no thanks. I'm perfectly happy backuping my data to my NAS with mirrored disks.
~Syberz
Sounds like it's a CODA file system with encryption & less robustness (single master server)
There is a war going on for your mind.
The only disk space I would be comfortable donating to this would be on a Truecrypted drive, so even if someone cracks their protection, it's secondarily protected by mine. If the cops seize my drive, they find nothing.
I piss off bigots.
That's the thing with social/cpu/storage collective software...
You have to PARTICIPATE in order to get the benefits.
If you don't want to share, then nobody wants to share with you!
Love how people take a generic tool, useful to all areas, and reject them because one of the potential uses happens to be child pornography, terrorism, abortion, or whatever socially unacceptable behaviour is around in that particular moment. What will be next? Medicine because it will let live sick kiddie pron collectors?
I agree that are tools for which most if not all uses are negative (guns?). But for this particular one, the potential good uses are too broad to just deny the entire idea. And privacy will demand that noone should be able to see whats there except the owner.
About speed, i suppose that it will depend of what will be the main use of it. But the biggest speed hit (and limit) will be the originator of the info, not the whole internet (is not like i.e. video streaming, that have a lot of viewers)
Congratulations?