Slashdot Mirror


Berners-Lee Wants Truth Ratings For Websites

holy_calamity writes "While introducing the new World Wide Web Foundation Tim Berners-Lee made also asked for a system of ratings to help people distinguish truth and untruth online. 'On the web the thinking of cults can spread very rapidly,' he said, saying that 'there needed to be new systems that would give websites a label for trustworthiness once they had been proved reliable sources.'"

29 of 535 comments (clear)

  1. Just what we need... by cabjf · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a truthiness rating!

    1. Re:Just what we need... by Nasajin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly you don't understand truthiness. I don't need a rating, I know the answer in my gut.

    2. Re:Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd mod you +1 truthy (but I could be making this up).

    3. Re:Just what we need... by KGIII · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone mod him up lest the rest miss him. Do you REALLY want to know how well /. would hold up in a test for truth?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Just what we need... by Nasajin · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation.

    5. Re:Just what we need... by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, its something he got while making fun of wikipedia.

      --
      You mad
    6. Re:Just what we need... by QZTR · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Which, if I am correct..."

      You're aren't correct.

      --
      To quote LongNoi "QZTR was right and won't leave me alone because I called him a moron when I was wrong" FYS
    7. Re:Just what we need... by eiceic · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm thinking we need a "Truth Authority" coalition. Maybe the Catholic Church, the U.S. Government, and Fortune 500 companies -- they have a good track record so far.

    8. Re:Just what we need... by chebucto · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm with you. In fact, I'm taking Latin classes at the moment so I can finally avoid vulgar tongues entirely.

      The language of Shakespeare is too recent an invention for my tastes; it's the language of Cicero for me!

      And for anyone who might find this viewpoint absurd, keep in mind that I'm not taking it too far, like those Sanskrit-only types.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    9. Re:Just what we need... by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      yo wassup

      i no what u mean ppl keep judgng me on how i right ppl shld quit jugdng me on hwo i right

      (Gah, I hate myself for writing that)

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    10. Re:Just what we need... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think their word of the past year was "w00t!"

      The mating call of the homosexual barn owl?

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    11. Re:Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I detest having to retort to you in this vulgar tongue, but so it is. Those Sanskrit-only types are merely poseurs, wishing they too spoke Sumerian. Of course, I admit I'm not a purist myself, occasionally reading the newfangled Linear A. Unfortunately, I must occasionally employ translators to deal with the modern world who speak these vulgar 'modern' languages. FIE I say! FIE!

    12. Re:Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That depends on what your deffinition of "is" is.

  2. This article is not true. by mraiser · · Score: 5, Funny

    There. Now you know.

    1. Re:This article is not true. by zotz · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This is the problem with truth : Everything most people know to be true is wrong"

      42

      That should about settle things for everyone.

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
  3. I don't know if I believe this... by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    slashdot's been wrong in the past.

  4. Re:I can get you ratings readily enough... by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you just imagine all the poor people who are heavily confused about the state of affairs in Soviet Russia after reading slashdot? How were they to know that these things were untrue!?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  5. Re:I can get you ratings readily enough... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, truth rates YOU!

    Waitaminit....that's almost how it should be...

  6. Slashdot getting a truth rating? by MistaE · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick! Someone hide kdawson!

  7. Re:Where's the "goodluckwiththat" tag by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    We'll get started on it as soon as we finish the semantic web.

  8. Re:I can get you ratings readily enough... by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you just imagine all the poor people who are heavily confused about the state of affairs in Soviet Russia after reading slashdot? How were they to know that these things were untrue!?

    Wait a minute. This is just a special case of internationalization!

    1. Check visitors IP
    2. Look up geo-position
    3. Serve up localized truth
    4. ???
    5. Profit!!!

    --
    She made the willows dance
  9. Re:This will never work by cthulu_mt · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, those are statistics...its different.

    Sorry Mr. Twain.

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  10. Re:Truth rate this post by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, let's truth rate (True or False answers only) the following sentence in this post:

    "This sentence is false."

    I'd have to give it 3 trues out of 5 possible.

    --
    She made the willows dance
  11. Re:And Then What? by TheP4st · · Score: 3, Funny

    Neah you rate them as Confirmed, Plausible or Busted. If in doubt on which of the three that are applicable you contact Myth Busters.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  12. Re:And Then What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Easy!

    >UFO

    False

    > paranormal phenomena

    False

    > Christianity

    True

    > Islam

    True

    > Scientology

    False

    > acupuncture

    True

    > homeopathy

    False

    > OS feature debates?

    False

    Next!

  13. Bury by coryking · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please dont go against the groupthink on diggdot. Until then, I have no choice but to bury your comment and then reply to it flaming you.

    It is a well known fact that George Bush used dozens of Cops with Tasers to bring down Richard Stallman for Smoking Legal Pot for his Melanoma. We should ban Tasers, Bush, Cops and vote Paul/Stallman for 2008 (Paul is still running, the MSM just lies about it).

    Also, the moon landing is a hoax, 9/11 really happened on 9/12 but the Pepsi bottling company wanted it moved a day to sell more soda so the fat cats in Washington fucked with the calandar to make it so (this is true, there have been several other diggdot stories proving it...), and Diebold stole every election since Hoover.

    Now digg my comment *up* please--if not for stating the obvious, but for its inner truth.

  14. Re:And Then What? by rugatero · · Score: 4, Funny

    At what point did Berners-Lee appoint themselves Rulers of the Truth?

    Shortly after aquiring multiple personalities?

    --
    This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
  15. Critical thinking is overrated...trust me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It would be far more efficacious to push for a critical thinking and debate class requirements in grade and collegiate level schools.

    But if everyone was good at critical thinking, I wouldn't be special anymore. The advantages which put me in a higher economic rung than most people in my age-group will no longer be advantages...I will be a commoner again...relegated to the same mundane jobs that the rest of them are.

    That sucks. I think I would prefer for most of the populace to remain stupider than me, even if it means putting up with DRM and evil governments.

  16. Websites? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want hese ratings on PEOPLE. They need to be endorsed by the official Ministry of Truth.

    This law is enacted retroactively, yesterday.

    Those not conforming to official truth records are subject to reformation and compulsory psychological medication.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."