Slashdot Mirror


Popup Study Confirms Most Users Are Idiots

danieltdp writes "Testing students at a University, psychologists made many of them click on a dialog box that in effect said: 'You are about to install some malware. Malware is bad. By clicking yes you are failing the Windows Darwin Test.' Nearly half of them said all they cared about was getting rid of these dialogs."

30 of 568 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Summary is WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Taco's starting the drinking early today.

  2. Slashdot summary proves editors are idiots by QZTR · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article

    The authors, who work in the Psychology Department of North Carolina State University, crafted a set of four fake dialog boxes. All of them contained the following warning: "The instruction at '0x77f41d24 referenced memory at '0x595c2a4c.' The memory could not be 'read.' Click OK to terminate program." One of the warnings was indistinguishable from the standard Windows XP system dialog, but the remaining three were had a number of warning signs that should tip off users to potential malware.

    In all cases, mousing over the "OK" button would cause the cursor to turn into a hand button, behavior more typical of a browser control; all dialogs also had minimize and maximize buttons, while a second added a browser status bar to the bottom of the window. Finally, the most blatant one alternated between black text and a white background and a white-on-black theme. All of these should metaphorically scream, "This is not safe!"

    Ah yes, well, not understanding the obvious "metaphor" of course makes one an idiot...

    So what does that lying ass bullshit headline make one? And no, you don't get a pass because you ripped it off the article's author, WTF do you think editors do (at other places I mean, here it seems all you do is shove food down your gullet and crank out tripe like this).

    --
    To quote LongNoi "QZTR was right and won't leave me alone because I called him a moron when I was wrong" FYS
    1. Re:Slashdot summary proves editors are idiots by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 2, Funny

      Human

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
  3. Re:Newsflash! by egregious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Osmosis? They gain knowledge from us through the diffusion of water?

  4. Re:The actual text by treeves · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did "read" really have those single quotes around it? That would have been pretty 'suspicious' to me. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  5. A university study confirms it? by Curate · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sorry, but I will not believe this data until Netcraft confirms it.

  6. Re:Summary is WRONG by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've learned to just click through to the article without reading the slashdot summary. It doesn't seem to have hurt my computer at all, but I -- Oh, wait. I just heard a bell. Gosh, I feel hungry right now.

  7. Re:Newsflash! by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everytime I hear that said, I always wonder if a better idiot would be smarter or dumber. And the longer I think on it, the more doubt starts to creep in that I may be the latest model...

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
  8. Re:The actual text by GuldKalle · · Score: 4, Funny

    To be 'fair', the dialog box they were going for does have those quotes.

    --
    What?
  9. Re:Summary is WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It doesn't matter what the box said or how it behaved, the fact is they clicked on it without reading it. This is good for me because I am a tech and am happy to profit off of the stupidity of users. Keep clicking you morons and keep me in business.

  10. Re:Correction by santiagoanders · · Score: 2, Funny

    An idiot has lower cognitive and social ability than a moron. I would expect that if the university students are idiots, then most users are just bags of water and foul smelling gasses.

    --
    "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
  11. Re:Newsflash! by orclevegam · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's because the bogons they emit react destructively with our cluons. I believe this is the process by which otherwise promising programmers become middle management potential. Prolonged exposure to PHBs and lusers causes cluon destruction and eventual bogon poisoning. It is truly a vicious cycle.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  12. Re:woo, I won! by dan828 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy a Mac, so that your stupidity doesn't damage your OS! Apple should start a new advertising campaign with that one.

  13. Obviously... by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, obviously, after clicking ok on a popup, another popup should open that contains a picture of the previous popup and a message "This is what you just clicked. Are you sure it's not malware?" That should take care of it. If enough of us send suggestions to Microsoft, there may be enough time to get it into Windows 7.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. Re:The actual text by rishistar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did "read" really have those single quotes around it? That would have been pretty 'suspicious' to me. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

    No, but the word 'Cancel' in the dialog box was replaced with the phrase 'Say No More'....

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  15. Re:Even more importantly... by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Funny

    She couldn't remember what it said. I told her it said to plug it in or it would turn itself off. Her response: "Oops".

    And you decided to spend the rest of your life with this woman, and mingle your genes with hers, and have her raise your children????

    People who wish to mingle genes and raise children with _female_humans_ generally learn to accept this. Not that I expect all /.ers to understand.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  16. Re:Even more importantly... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

    And you decided to spend the rest of your life with this woman, and mingle your genes with hers, and have her raise your children????

    $5 says your wife asks the same question when you leave the toilet seat up.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  17. Re:The actual text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The legitimate error messages of that form often do, indeed, surround "read" with quotation marks.

    Wouldn't that make it """read"""?

  18. Re:Study confirms most popups are idiotic by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly popups don't work in an effective way, yet programmers continue to use them for the wrong purposes.... What would make more sense is for programmers to design their pop up use better so that it is more meaningful for the user.

    You have 1024 infections on your computer!
    Press REPAIR to fix these problems.

    A friend of mine came for help because he couldn't open his drive C: I told him he probably had a virus. He said that he even used an antivirus program. Which one? Here's his answer:

    One that said "Your computer is infected!"

  19. Re:NOT: (was Re:Summary is WRONG) by dark-nl · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm used to the commenters not reading the articles. That's life on the net, and with all those comments to read and reply to, who has time for the articles?

    I've even gotten used to the slashdot editors not reading the articles. After all, there are a lot of submissions and it's not like it's their job. The queue is long, the day is short, etc etc. I understand all that.

    But when I realized that even the submitters don't read the articles they summarize... that is when I cried. Something broke inside me.

    Even that was a couple of years ago, though. I'm all better now, and life is wonderful now that things don't have to make sense anymore. I feel so free!

  20. Re:Even more importantly... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's effectively impossible for any of your confidential information to be stolen as a result of leaving the toilet seat up...

    Not true. Tell me this doesn't sound familiar:

    "My husband left the toilet seat up last night."

    "That's nothing, my husband hasn't been able to get it up for 3 months."

    ;)

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  21. Re:The actual text by orasio · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, it would just be ""read"".

  22. Re:Even more importantly... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Funny

    In fairness, the doctor can't check my event viewer.

  23. Re:The actual text by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Funny

    You are seeing the window as a computer expert.

    Indeed, but sometimes the expert needs to stand back a bit and think from the point of view of a clueless newbie. Like my dad, for instance, a few days ago when presented with some sort of "unrecoverable error has occurred... [OK]" message, his perfectly legitimate reaction was to say "No, it's NOT fucking OK!"

    These acknowledgement clickboxes have become little more than a sloppy way of avoiding the trouble of coding properly.

  24. Re:Even more importantly... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2, Funny

    The other choice is to be more selective in who you mate with.

    So... How goes the hunt then, friend?

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  25. Re:Study confirms most popups are idiotic by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Funny
    Glad you enjoyed Ubuntu. There's lots more fun where that came from. Explore, play, have a blast.

    Why is the slashdot time format "06:08PM"?

    Because seconds since the epoch requires too much division for most people to bother with. ;)

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  26. Re:The actual text by LaskoVortex · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this is the dialog in question, then I think even I would have clicked 'Ok',

    I would wonder what right IE has to proxy as my OS and terminate another program and I would get suspicious. Then I would think "oh yeah, this is Microsoft, they do stuff like that all the time." And then I would say to myself, "hey, this is some other person's computer, who gives a fuck?" And then I would click ok and finish taking the stupid test and get my $20.00 for being a test subject and get the hell out of there and then never think of it again, until I saw it on /. Then I would say to myself "Hahaha. Those dumbasses at PCU didn't know how to do science. Of course the subjects are going to click through whatever--they just want to get out of there. Looks like they got in a good journal. Man, that journal got duped. I wonder who the tards were who reviewed that paper...Hey look, a twitter post and I just blew my chance to mod this thread. Damnit."

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  27. Re:The actual text by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

    The "read" version is definitely more common, though, for some reason.

    Most computers spend more time reading than writing. I know this is insanely simple, but that is why you see more read errors.

    There's a lesson here for slashdotters.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  28. Re:stuff by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Really? I wouldn't know. I've been drinking.

  29. Re:The actual text by Toonol · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't underestimate my fanaticism.