Slashdot Mirror


LHC Offline Until April 2009 (Or Longer)

rufey writes "The recent problems at the Large Hadron Collider will now keep it idle until spring 2009. The official press release is here. The LHC went offline due to a suspected failure in a superconducting connection, which overheated and caused around 100 of the LHC's super-cooled magnets to heat up by as much as 100 degrees. This resulted in the accidental release of a ton of liquid helium. The process required to repair the failed superconducting connection involves weeks of warming up the affected area from -456 degrees Fahrenheit to room temperature, and then several more weeks to cool it back down after the repair is made. The total amount of time to do this will spill over into CERN's scheduled winter maintenance/shutdown period, which is partly done to save money on electricity during the period of peak demand."

69 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can wait till next spring for the world to end.

    1. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Basically what happened is when they fired it up, a giant ring - gate, if you will - appeared, and they don't have it under control yet.

    2. Re:I can wait by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, there will be another delay, then another, then another, until it goes live in 2012.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:I can wait by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must not be an American. I was hoping for total annihilation rather than having to live through the election.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    4. Re:I can wait by Barradrewda · · Score: 4, Funny

      Spring is in the air! Higgs bosons everywherrrrrrrre!

    5. Re:I can wait by tjstork · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must not be an American. I was hoping for total annihilation rather than having to live through the election.

      As a consolation prize, at least we get to watch the Palin / Biden debate. That's going to be a fun program of sure brain surgery, for sure.

      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:I can wait by icedcool · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gordon Freeman was on hand to take care of things.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    7. Re:I can wait by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is awesome, because every time they're about to fire it up we can use the "come on baby, tomorrow could be the end of the world... they're firing up the LHC..." line.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    8. Re:I can wait by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh yeah, that's gonna be great:

      MODERATOR: "Senator Biden, what qualifies you to be Vice President?"
      BIDEN: [answer redacted due to copyrights held by the estate of Neil Kinnock and the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome]
      MODERATOR: "Yes, yes. And you, Governor Pain, what qualifies you?"
      PALIN: "Nothing."[long pause] "But I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night!"
      Exeunt, pursued by a bear. With hair plugs and wearing lipstick.

      Which reminds me, I need to make sure that my wet bar is fully stocked.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    9. Re:I can wait by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah I was wondering. Does it open the gates to the Dungeon Dimensions to let the creatures that live there in?

      Let's just say you'd better have your Young Men's Reformed-Cultists-of-the-Ichor-God Bel-Shamharoth Association dues paid up.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    10. Re:I can wait by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because if we were in one of the unlucky universes we wouldn't be having this conversation, that's what the thought experiment is. The idea goes like this, there are an infinate number of universes so anything that could even remotely happen will happen in one of them. Since you will only be aware of a universe if you are in it to experience it, you (as in yourself) will never die.

      Lets say I hook a nuclear bomb up to a detector that detects whether a single radioactive atom has decayed yet. After each half life of the particle, a new universe is created, one in which I am dead, and one in which I am alive. Needless to say, I'm not around to care about the universes that I am dead in. From my point of view, the bomb will never detonate because if it does than that cannot be my point of view any longer.

      Of course, this only works if the many worlds interpetation is correct, if it isn't then you will eventually die. Also, the argument only works for you. If someone else does the experiment they will die, at least according to your point of view. Luckily, anything that will destroy the world will also kill me, so the world is safe.

    11. Re:I can wait by RabidMoose · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which reminds me, I need to make sure that my wet bar is fully stocked.

      You kidding? I'm having a full-out PARTY for that debate. Hot dogs, wings, and beer all around. I expect it to be more entertaining than the combined entertainment value of the last year of MTV.
      Games to play: Write down your favorite dumb Palin quote of the night, toss in the hat, see which gets the most votes!
      Biden roulette! Hand out poker chips, put your bets down on "Yes/No" or "Gong" for each answer.

    12. Re:I can wait by daboochmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      Informative?!? This was rated as Informative?!? ./ has really gone downhill, the post doesn't even describe the acceptable payment methods, the actual cost of the dues, nothing. Sheesh ....

      --
      "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  2. Hmmmmmm by rodney+dill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now where did that paper clip go?

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:Hmmmmmm by AndersOSU · · Score: 5, Funny

      It looks like you're trying to repair a superconductor coolant loop. Would you like to:
      (a) vent all helium
      (b) order another 30 ton transformer
      (c) damn the torpedoes, lets make some black holes.

    2. Re:Hmmmmmm by jitterman · · Score: 2, Funny

      (d)Profit?

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  3. Damn by megamerican · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I'll have to wait even longer to welcome our new demonic overlords who were supposed to come out of the stargate that the LHC will create.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    1. Re:Damn by ivandavidoff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. I'm not an expert, but I believe "a suspected failure in a superconducting connection, which overheated and caused around 100 of the LHC's super-cooled magnets to heat up by as much as 100 degrees" is just fancy-talk for "we made a wormhole, but it wasn't big enough".

    2. Re:Damn by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I'll have to wait even longer to welcome our new demonic overlords who were supposed to come out of the stargate that the LHC will create.

      Well, it looks like the best estimates will have the LHC running full collisions will be sometime in December, 2012.

      Hey wait a minute!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Damn by jimmux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, if this actually happened do you think they would delay it beyond December 2012 just because the coincidence is too freaky to dismiss?

  4. -456 degrees? by Squapper · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought the absolute zero was at -273...ah, damn americans!

    1. Re:-456 degrees? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought the absolute zero was at -273...ah, damn americans!

      I thought absolute zero was at 0...
      ah, damn humans.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    2. Re:-456 degrees? by rodney+dill · · Score: 2, Funny

      220, 221, whatever it takes.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    3. Re:-456 degrees? by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay folks lets get it straight. The US isn't the only one that still doesn't use the metric system for everything.
      http://www.toyota.co.uk/cgi-bin/toyota/bv/generic_editorial.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@0174202331.1222276069@@@@&BV_EngineID=cccdadeffffejeicfngcfkmdfkidfgh.0&deepLink=YA3_Specification_new&nodiv=TRUE&fullwidth=TRUE&edname=specSheet_YA3&carModel=Yaris&imgName=bv/CarChapter/YA3/Imagery/YA3_spec.jpg&zone=Zone%20YARIS
      Here is a link to a Japanese car company selling a car in the UK.
      They give the fuel economy in MPG as well as KM per liter.
      Drives me crazy when I get UK motor cycle mag. The give the fuel economy in MPG and the fuel tank size in Liters!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:-456 degrees? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about that 'a ton' of liquid helium, is that like.... a lot, or was it exactly 2,000 pounds?

      A ton is exactly 2240 lbs. Otherwise it wouldn't be a round number of hundredweights (or stones) and that would just be silly.

      Unless it's a metric ton, which is spelt "tonne", and is exactly 2204 and a bit lbs. Simple, no?

      Being scientists, the quantity in this instance was probably more or less a shedload.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:-456 degrees? by Bob-taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Drives me crazy when I get UK motor cycle mag. The give the fuel economy in MPG and the fuel tank size in Liters!

      Not only that, but British Gallons and U.S. gallons are different!

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    6. Re:-456 degrees? by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      1 tonne = 1000kg.

      Makes no sense, and that pisses me off. I much prefer my units being eighths of a unit made up of one twelfth of a unit made up of a third of a unit made up of 1/1760th of the largest practical unit.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:-456 degrees? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep that is why the same car with the same engine gets better mileage in the EU than the US. Often they really don't.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  5. Now what do I do? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I spent all my money over the last 6 months on alcohol and parties, secure in the knowledge that the world would come to an end this October when the LHC came up to full power.

    This is unacceptable. I demand they destroy the world now.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Now what do I do? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...spent all my money...secure in the knowledge that the world would come to an end this October

      Yeah, you and all the banks!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:Now what do I do? by neoform · · Score: 2, Funny

      This reminds me of a friend of mine, who on his deathbed told me:

      All my life, I spent 90% of my money on hookers and alcohol.. and I wasted the other 10%.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:Now what do I do? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given the recent stock crisis, that was probably the best thing you could have done with your money anyway.

  6. Projected start date by Cor-cor · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe with all the problems they're having, the actual date when the high-energy collisions begin will be December 2012.

  7. Re:Not the end of the world by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

    A year from now everyone will be complaining about the huge price tag on this thing that has never been 100% operational.

    It's the Windows Vista of supercolliders.

  8. Ouch by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I understand things were going well - then there was this 'big bang'....

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  9. Save energy ? what the hell ? by unity100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the BIGGEST and probably the most important experiment ever conceived is underway, and they are being left to think about saving energy ?

    if there is anything that world shouldnt be saving energy, if there is anything that needs to be subsidized by governments, this is it.

    because, this is IT. if the god particle is found, the smallest block of EXISTENCE will be found.

    im appalled how EU is not being of sufficient assistance in this. unbelievable.

    1. Re:Save energy ? what the hell ? by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Informative

      When they're using the kind of energy that knocks out country powergrids, then yes, it is a consideration.

  10. Re:-456 F? What is that? by Nesomir · · Score: 3, Informative

    Say something meaningful--the magnets were about 2 degrees Kelvin.

    you mean 2 Kelvin (since it is an absolute scale)

  11. Back-of-the-envelope costs by digitalderbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last time I checked, LHe was about $5 USD a liter. A metric ton is 1000kg, and LHe's density is 0.125g/ml (wikipedia), which amounts to 8000 liters or about 40k. Considering that He is non-renewable, leaking out of the atmosphere, hopefully they were able to reclaim and recompress it.

  12. Ton of Helium by necro81 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A ton of helium! What's the big deal? That's, like, way lighter than a ton of air!

    [I'm being facetious about the weights, but in terms of cost, losing a ton of helium is freakin' expensive]

  13. We know. You can tell from the LHC cyro status. by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look at the LHC cyro status for sector 3-4. Average magnet temperature is now at 70K, and slowly creeping up to room temperature. Notice the expanded vertical scale on the graph. Compare with the other sectors, holding with liquid helium at 1.9K.

    Warmup is slow. Cooldown is slower. Several kilometers of pipe and a hundred or so magnets are involved.

    It's not that bad, though. It looks like they won't have to take magnets out of the tunnel for rewinding. That's a huge job. This is just a slow one.

    They can warm up or chill down sector 3-4 during the shutdown period. The rest of the system would normally be cooled during shutdown anyway.

  14. Re:A ton? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

    The LHC cooling circuit has something like 400 tons of helium in it.
    One ton missing sounds reasonable.

    The cold doesnt matter, btw. Liquid helium has a really low heat capacity and evaporation enthalpy. A dewar full of liquid nitrogen spilled will do much more damage than 10 times the amount of helium, even if the helium temperature is lower.

    And helium is not THAT expensive. At least compared to the other costs.

    A physicists analogy is that a LN2 costs as much as cheap beer, while L He as much as good whiskey, per volume... (I once used 2000l of liquid helium in a single week because of a faulty magnet that couldnt be replaced during beamtime. Although that was of course recaptured. I hope they have options to do that in the LHC cave, too, even though the initial containment was breached)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  15. Re:Didn't they kinda predict this? by Extremus · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, if this is correct, we now know that it will work.

  16. Re:-456 F? What is that? by Protoslo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could claim that I was born before the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures and exhort you to get off my lawn...but I'd be lying.

  17. The future is now! by DerCed · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome the Higgs bosons from the future that successfully interfere with the LHC in the present!

  18. -450who? by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, I'm a born and raised American, and -453 Fahrenheit means nothing to me. Even us Americans use Celsius for science. If I read a temperature outside of what the weatherman could report, then a Fahrenheit measurement is just another number that I have to convert before it will mean something. (Let's see... being a former Clevelander, the weatherman range would be from about -30 to 110 F.)

    Please. If it's science, give us our 'degrees C'.

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    1. Re:-450who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The measurement should have been in Kelvin, anyway. Perhaps the author isn't a science guy.

  19. Party time by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe with all the problems they're having, the actual date when the high-energy collisions begin will be December 2012.

    That actually is appropriate, though probably not in the sense that P means. The Mesoamerican calandar that 'ends' in 2012 is just the end of a chunk of a calendar, to be followed by another chunk, and another, etc. It is like New Year's Eve for us; the end of a cycle and an excuse to party. 2012 is just an excuse to party, Mayan style, ripping the hearts out of human sacrifices or however they celebrate it.
    When the first collisions happen, that will be grounds for partying also.

  20. Re:Until april? by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a guy running back and forth down the tunnel with a bucket of warm water...

  21. Shouldn't take THAT long by bugeaterr · · Score: 2, Funny

    To upgrade to XP.

    Turns out one of the new particles forgot to get certified Vista-ready.

    Not naming any names here (I'm looking at you muon-antineutrino!)

  22. They will trun it back the day after the CUBS win by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    They will trun it back the day after the CUBS win it all.

  23. Re:Not the end of the world by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're being unfair, but they have a plan.

    They're going to rename it the Large Mojave Collider and prove that its just bad press that is making them look bad.

  24. Re:Not Really by Abreu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Naw, its too late.

    Turns out McCain is Kang and Obama is Kodos.

    You know its useless to vote for a third candidate.

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  25. Read the article by Technopaladin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if anyone has considered the dangers of that much free helium. If there was a horrible accident at LHC if they called anyone their voices would be too high pitched to take seriously.

  26. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Legion_SB · · Score: 3, Funny

    They will trun it back the day after the CUBS win it all.

    Against Miami?
    Yeah. Who would've thought? 100 to 1 shot! I wish I could go back to the beginning of the season, put some money on the Cubs.

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  27. LHC Joke of the Day by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: What did one CERN Scientist say to the other after they collided their first particles?

    A: What's the matter?

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    1. Re:LHC Joke of the Day by hotchai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think of this conversation *after* they inhaled all that Helium! All jokes are more funny in He-induced voice.

  28. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, the world ended when the Red Sox won it all, it's just that nobody noticed.

  29. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by drolli · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am dissappointed. We are on slashdot. Please say instead
    "The results will be evalutaed using GNU/Hurd"
    or "The operators could finish a round of DNF in the breaks" or "a microsoft linux running on phantom game consoles is used as a thin client operating system" etc...

    NO Sports, please!

  30. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But seriously, what about space suits? They allow people to survive in absolute 0. Why can't they be used?

  31. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're not familiar with large scale industrial operations. Even a large boiler must be disabled for a week or so before reaching room temperature. You're not going to be able to bring that much material to such a low temperature quickly.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  32. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by theantipop · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I moved to Cincinnati.

  33. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are *quite* heavy in a gravity well.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  34. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who do not know, that is a Mark Twain quote (presumed to be, anyhow)

    "When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it's always twenty years behind the times."

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  35. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by elmartinos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spacesuits operate in vacuum, which means there are almost no no particles around, so the word temperature does not make much sense there. Vacuum is an excellent insulator, so it is easy to keep them warm. It is a myth that you instantly freeze when exposed to the vacuum of space.

  36. A possible reason for the setback by lkstrand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can this explain the reason for the setback?

    "the paper suggested that future effects caused by the production of particles, such as the Higgs, could ripple backwards in time and prevent the LHC from ever operating."

  37. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by m50d · · Score: 2, Insightful
    More seriously: the LHC wasn't designed with repairability/serviceability in mind, it seems.

    I doubt that; rather it was designed as serviceably as *possible*. Which isn't very given how cold and how freakin' big it needs to be. The whole thing is an exercise in pushing the boundaries; it's hard enough designing it to work at all.

    --
    I am trolling
  38. Re:You're no kind of scientist. by cgaertner · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, *real* scientists use natural units and measure temperature in eV - like everything else ;)

  39. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shoot water into a vacuum. What happens? Ice crystals.

    What if it's a really hot vacuum?