Slashdot Mirror


The Pirate Bay — "Just a Very Large Hobby"

praps writes "In a fascinating interview with two of the founders of The Pirate Bay entitled 'Are they baby-eating monsters or what?,' Swedish news site The Local discovers that far from being the radical Robin Hoods of the digital age, Peter Sunde and Fredrik Neij are actually 'polite, humorous and down-to-earth.' They may run one of the biggest sites in the world but 'it's just a hobby that's grown to be very, very large.' Financially, they are 'happy as long as it doesn't make a loss,' and both hold down regular IT day jobs. And apparently they spend a lot of time with a Bedouin in the Sinai desert."

214 comments

  1. Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile I take piracy very seriously and treat my baby-eating as a hobby.

    1. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by that+IT+girl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mmmm... babies. The other white meat!

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    2. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's racist! I prefer dark meat babies!

    3. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by DanielG42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only on slashdot would a post like this be modded insightful.

      --
      Daniel
    4. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Zwicky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Insightful!?

      OK you've convinced me. I've just been out to the children's playarea and picked one up. How do I prepare it, just drop it into a pot of boiling water or what? Grill? Barbacue?

      There is one advantage I have noticed to this: I'll cook it last as it is currently chopping vegetables. A HUGE timesaver!

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    5. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Jugalator · · Score: 1, Redundant

      African meat or European?

      OK, sorry, maybe I'm taking this too far. :)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only on slashdot would a post like this be modded insightful.

      Seeing as how the moderation system is unique to slashdot, you're probably right.

    7. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm... babies. The other white meat!

      Lovely with a little lemon & Butter.

      Possibly a nice Chardonnay...

      fisp fisp fisp fisp fisp fisp

    8. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "boiling frog".

    9. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Google "bullshit myth".

    10. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm... babies. The other white meat!

      Mmmm, baby back ribs made from real babies!

      Jonathan Swift would be so proud.

    11. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Aint it great? :D

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    12. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Babies can't jump... But they taste better cooked that way.

    13. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by weber · · Score: 1

      It's the other, other white meat, you know...

    14. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout.

    15. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to read "Hansel and Grettel"
      Children are supposed to be baked into an oven...

      You get bonus points if you are the evil stepmother.

    16. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by antic · · Score: 1

      Fun to make, fun to eat!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    17. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do I prepare it, just drop it into a pot of boiling water or what? Grill? Barbacue?

      Catching the infant by the ankles and swinging it brusquely around in tight circles usually does the trick.(And it's won't bruise the meat!) After this, it's best to oven roast at about 160 degrees centigrade until the flanks turn golden brown.(Some people use a rotating spit, but be careful to secure the limbs!). Remember to add a little oil if the child is lean.

      The meat should be tender and moist when serving, and is quite filling. Serve with a light salad and cool rice. A fine Californian red is a perfect accompaniment both during and after this meal. For ambiance, the deeper sounds of the viola will aid digestion, or if they are not too shrill, the wails of the mother can be most uplifting.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    18. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      So what you're asking is the velocity at which it gets swallowed? (For the purposes of the question we'll assume it's unladen)

    19. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by quenda · · Score: 1

      How do I prepare it, just drop it into a pot of boiling water or what?

      Delicately simmer in a pot of its mother's milk.

    20. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by DarkSabreLord · · Score: 1

      how is babby formed?

    21. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by zonker · · Score: 0
    22. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know it takes 5 babies to make just one bottle of baby oil?

    23. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It tastes like chicken, either one.

    24. Re:Baby eating monsters unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the '(+1, Schadenfreude)' moderation?

  2. Re:missing semicolon by yincrash · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and i guess it got fixed. that was fast.

  3. Not radical Robin Hoods? by autophile · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...far from being the radical Robin Hoods of the digital age, Peter Sunde and Fredrik Neij are actually 'polite, humorous and down-to-earth.'

    What, did they expect them to be carrying RPGs, in small boats, off the coast of Somalia or something?

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've heard conflicting stories about those (real) pirates. Some say they are protecting their waters that were being over fished by foreigners, CNN of course just says that they are after it for the money.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      That would certainly increase their sex appeal.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    3. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are plenty of RPGs on The Pirate Bay.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      What, did they expect them to be carrying RPGs, in small boats, off the coast of Somalia or something?

      No, no that's the blue collar pirates. They were probably expecting some sort of pirate lair with all the booty (the treasure kind... really) that they're busy figuring out where to stash (dug down under the big X has a poor ROI), just like drug lords aren't exactly on the street peddling little white bags.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've heard conflicting stories about those (real) pirates. Some say they are protecting their waters that were being over fished by foreigners, CNN of course just says that they are after it for the money.

      Well, they attack transport ships, and when they get a microphone their demands are for money, not less fishing. So...

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    6. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their demands are for money, not less fishing. So...

      /Peter_Griffin

      Uh... Can't it be both? /Peter_Griffin off

    7. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by orielbean · · Score: 3, Funny

      that's why they got the tanks - to protect the fish who have no thumbs to pull triggers with.

    8. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by genotype · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, and the Somalis who were dragging US troops behind their cars were just street cleaning. They're very misunderstood.

    9. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      When I heard that news story I was actually thinking, "What the hell does Kenya need with a boat load of tanks?!".

      I guessing this is what the funds bono raises gets spent on..

    10. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by WK2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Interesting how people who say this: "Instead of simply recommending that you sodomize yourself with a retractable baton, let me recommend a specific model - the ASP 21". The previous lawyers tried to use a cheaper brand, but it broke during the action." are described as "polite".

      http://static.thepiratebay.org/apple_response.txt

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    11. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Whoosh.

    12. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleaning? Like you clean your table with a pile of poo? Yeah, right... ;)

      Oh my god, I really hope anonymous mode does not fail this time... ;)

    13. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, that's the politest way I have ever heard someone say "Go fuck yourself." ever.

    14. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by qwan · · Score: 1

      This smells like a PR article for the pirates. Why would anyone be surprised. Did they put in a hidden cam and found out they are "polite". Like others have commented that IT people on the whole are polite. I don't know anyone apart from WWF fighters who are not polite when taking an interview. Murderers, underworld dons, the mafia are also very polite when interviewed.

    15. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Yes,

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    16. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by laejoh · · Score: 0

      While in fact they are all environmentalists, protecting us from global warming!

    17. Re:Not radical Robin Hoods? by isorox · · Score: 1

      I've heard conflicting stories about those (real) pirates. Some say they are protecting their waters that were being over fished by foreigners

      Which is why they attack fishing boats?

  4. surprising? by pak9rabid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Peter Sunde and Fredrik Neij are actually 'polite, humorous and down-to-earth.'

    And does this surprise anyone? I think most will find that most people that work in IT are this way. Sure there's the occasional elitist that likes to think their shit doesn't smell, but on the whole I'd say most people in IT are reasonable, easygoing people.

    1. Re:surprising? by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And does this surprise anyone? I think most will find that most people that work in IT are this way.

      Most people are. The people on top (any top, IT or not) mostly aren't. I'm not sure what top they think TPB is on though, but it's certainly doing well at something.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:surprising? by globaljustin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And does this surprise anyone?

      I could see how mainstream, non-geeks would get the idea that the guys who run a "piracy file sharing website" (as some in the MSM portray it) would look like that picture of Stallman from that /. story a few days ago...you know...stereotypical "anti-establishment" look...scraggly beard, Castro hat, dread locks or green-colored hair...

      Geeks shouldn't be surprised at all...but people who are on the outside looking in only have what they've heard in news reports to guide their perception, and I can at least understand why they would expect some anarchist types to be being TPB

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    3. Re:surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? Most IT guys i've ever met are insanely introverted and prickish.

    4. Re:surprising? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume anarchists aren't "polite, humorous, and down to earth"? Most of us are actually.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that, or condescending and prickish. Don't forget, people who don't have IT qualifications are retards!

    6. Re:surprising? by globaljustin · · Score: 0, Troll

      holy shit man...i'm talking about how mainstream people perceive based on what they hear in the media...for fuck's sake, I wasn't stereotyping anarchists...just pointing out that many people do...

      i love anarchists...

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    7. Re:surprising? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I could see how mainstream, non-geeks would get the idea that the guys who run a "piracy file sharing website" (as some in the MSM portray it)

      Huh? It is a piracy file-sharing website. It's even called "The Pirate Bay."

      It's a site devoted to ripping off material that artists are selling for a living so that you can get it for free. It exists solely to facilitate freeloading. Slashdot (as usual) is glorifying it by linking to this story.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    8. Re:surprising? by michaelmuffin · · Score: 1

      i love anarchists...

      and anarchists love you!

    9. Re:surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooooo... look at the big bad anarchist... sitting this at his COMPUTER... on his IKEA chair and desk.. sipping his frappolatte... FIGHT THE SYSTEM MAN!

  5. This just in: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hollywood's lawyers are just as committed to fantasy as their screenwriters...

    Seriously, though, what would you expect the operators of something like the pirate bay to be like? IT guys with a strong(and probably slightly odd) sense of humor seem exactly like what one would expect. I suspect that they have a sheeple index far, far lower than average; but, contrary to depressingly popular belief, the desire to not be fucked around with doesn't inevitably lead to all sorts of outrageous depravity.

    1. Re:This just in: by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      but, contrary to depressingly popular belief, the desire to not be fucked around with doesn't inevitably lead to all sorts of outrageous depravity.

      But, there will be depravity, right? :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:This just in: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You realise, of course, that using the word "sheeple" without a trace of irony invalidates your entire comment?

    3. Re:This just in: by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Why?
      Because it violates 'AC's Grammar rules?

      Crawl back under your bridge.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  6. Re:missing semicolon by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 3, Funny

    An endash isn't even typographically acceptable there. It should be an emdash.

  7. Oh like Robin Hood is going to TELL you by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called a secret identity for a reason. I bet if you check with their dry cleaner you'll find that they go through a LOT of tights.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. the tent! by Coraon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hehe what do you want to bet that if the picture showed the inside of the tent it would show the pirate bays off site backup server...I mean even microsoft uses tent computing...

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  9. Re:First? by Milkyfresh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm looking for another guy to bareback my gf (late 20s, white, cute to average) while I watch. If you're disease free, white, well hung, not too old, not too fat, etc, and live near Virginia Beach, let me know.

    I can meet 2 of those 6 requirements. Why do these tech jobs always have a huge list of required skill sets?

  10. Re:First? by RulerOf · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're disease free, white, well hung, not too old, not too fat, etc, and live near Virginia Beach

    Well, you've come to the right place for disease free and white.

    Not sure how close our mothers' basements are to Virginia Beach though....

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  11. I was just reading by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    about the origins of the Robin Hood legend.

    In the earliest documented version of the legend in anything like recognizable form, Robin and his Merry Men beat and rob a monk, then later on they decide to kill the monk and his page because they were afraid they would testify against them.

    The whole system of sheriffs was a form of oppression forced on the population by their Norman overlords -- that much the later legends sort of get right. Monasticism was a byproduct of a Christian society in which the highest echelons made their living by murder, robbery and extortion, and in which sins could be expunged through gifts to the church. The history of medieval monasticism was a story of reformist zeal followed by rapid accumulation of wealth and corruption, recapitulated over and over again.

    But notice: While it's obvious why robbing and killing sheriffs and monks might be considered admirable, apparently this doesn't stop at that. Killing the page was considered quite as merry and shrewd.

    There's a lesson in this.

    When the law becomes abusive, it's too much to expect that resistance to it take the form of highly principled disobedience. Once defying the law becomes seen as just and right, fine distinctions like between a corrupt church official and an innocent child witness go out the window.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:I was just reading by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      how innocent is someone who is immediately attached to a corrupt official?

      Anyone that close to a politician for instance, who does not know what is going on, is either lying, or has an IQ lower than his shoe size.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:I was just reading by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He may have been an indentured servant, sex slave, or something to that effect. More prisoner than apprentice.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful... civilization has progressed too far to allow "guilt by association" to come back to fore. Let's give people the benefit of the doubt, even for something as unpopular as politicians.

    4. Re:I was just reading by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, you're going to get caught for the killing of that sheriff anyways, so why not?

      Link to copyright: Well, you buy a game and it doesn't work. You instead go download a no-cd or crack.
      Next time, you just go download the game from whoever has it and go get the patches. Why not? The no-cd and cracks are illegal.

      Later on, after getting screwed with bad purchases one cant use and cant take back, one downloads everything they can. Movies, songs, applications, data.

      The sites are easy to find.
      BitTyrant - modded azureus for opportunistic sharing
      WASTE - encrypted P2P private nets. high security for friends and contacts only
      TOR - onion router for hiding ones tracks and researching things that are considered "unpalatable"
      HTTrack - multi-platform friendly web mirroring
      IRC - get a good client. Stay away from MIRC. Xircon, BitchX and others are usable as well as scriptable.

      Using TOR or another onion router-like tech, one can use IRC and initiate file trading via those channels. One could highlight a drop of a GPG'ed package at any number of file dumps online. Or, they could send it via email split in X many pieces.

      Let me know if there's anything that might be interesting to get. I could post links.

      --
    5. Re:I was just reading by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which illustrates my point. As soon as the barrier between lawful and unlawful behavior is no longer accepted as just, a determination of "fair game" for one act spreads to circumstantially related acts.

      It goes from "I'll get you," to "and your little dog, too."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hope you're a troll!

      "Once defying the law becomes seen as just and right, fine distinctions like between a corrupt church official and an innocent child witness go out the window."

      Can you site any cases outside mythology to support your determination that, say, Ghandi's independence movement in India, or the US civil rights movement or the UK nuclear disarmament movement of the 80's or the Aussie Franklin river protesters, or greenpeace, or even PETA, or the East Timorese movment of the 90's or the Tuianemen square victims or indeed ANY OTHER group who believed that the law was wrong .... ... have ever failed to make the distinction in question?

      I can't!

      Govt agencies don't count; they acknowledge the justness of the law, but either have immunity or just break it anyway.

      M. East suicide bombers probably don't have the logistical and technical resources to target the officials they'd like to. Nor, it seems, do predator drones.

      No, highly principled disobedience is certainly possible at any time, and is not too much to expect from anyone who claims to have free will. I think the men you describe are typical bad guys, and decided that any witness is one too many, and you're trying to extrapolate something more absolute from the tale, like trying to pull a length of piano wire from spaghetti.

      The lesson you claim is false and dangerous, and you are actively undermining people's understanding of humanity, compassion and morality.

    7. Re:I was just reading by hey! · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying civil disobedience never goes overboard?

      If so, it can only be by definition, which proves my point.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in robin hood mythology they fought for basic justice, food, and shelter. Here you are fighting for Mariah Carey mp3s and Wayans Bros movies. Something tells me there's a fundamental difference between these things.

    9. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope; I'm saying that good people know the difference between corrupt officials and little kids, and of murder in general.

      You the phrase "too much to expect". I submitted examples from history (and you know there are more) where a group of people have selected peaceful disobedience over armed resistance of any kind.

      Knowing that some people will choose not to be part of the peaceful group is not a reflection upon those that do.

      I see what you're saying but it doesn't prove your point; one of the reasons for C.D. is that wise people know that an armed struggle is morally corrosive to the protagonists.

      If we try 's/defying the law/physical attack/' then I agree with you. Either ignorance, fear and rage lead to bad judgements, or circumstances force one's hand. You can't just switch back from armed insurrection to peaceful protest on the battlefield! Physical violence, like alcohol is far too commonly seen as a solution for problems when it is not.

    10. Re:I was just reading by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, not in the early versions of the legend. It's only as attitudes toward the law change that we get a kind of mirror-lawful Robin Hood.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:I was just reading by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK. Timothy McVeigh. He thought the government had overstepped its bounds. He did not scruple, when attacking it, from blowing up a day care center.

      The history of copyrights furnish plenty of examples where people who find the copyright regime to be excessive have taken liberties that encroach upon what they otherwise would accept as reasonable rights of copyright holders. In fact this argument was first made by Lord Macaulay in his second address to Parliament on copyright extension.

      A modern example would be this: if a copyright holder makes it difficult for you to space shift an electronic copyright of a work, then plenty of people find a way around this, and don't scruple to distribute the fruits of their labor. Apple, on the other hand, has had great success by making their DRM less onerous to users, making space shifting relatively convenient and making it easy to recover your purchases when you no longer have access to the authorized machine. They also charge what most people regard as fair prices.

      As a result, Apple has a huge number of users who don't look on the restrictions Apple has put on their purchases as punitive. It really is not that difficult to get around Apple's DRM, but there has not been an explosion in trading of DRM stripped tracks you'd expect given the ubiquity of iPods.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well i suppose that if the law always served the greater good 'terrorist' would always be disjoint with 'freedom-fighter'

    13. Re:I was just reading by hey! · · Score: 1

      If the law always served the greater good, there would be no such thing as a freedom fighter.

      However, your point is a good one. Terrorism is an example of how when people decide that a transgression is justified, they aren't to selective as to who is harmed by transgression.

      I don't want to make this sound more mysterious than it really is. The fundamental thing going on here is that most people either are not very good at thinking, not inclined to question their own actions, or both. Once they get into killing outside some kind of legally defined sanction, they don't make up some kind of elaborate code describing who can be killed and who cannot. They just get on with it.

      The same with copyrights. Once they decide they're justified in copying a work, they don't self police the kinds of things they do with the copies they make, or refrain from making copies when certain conditions have been met. They just get on with it.

      Of course copying is not anything like killing, so you wouldn't expect people to put the same amount of thought into transgressive copying that they put into transgressive killing. Ironically, they usually do put the same amount of thought into these activities: zero, unless you count rationalization that what they are doing is right.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when *I* knifed the sheriff, I did not knife the page as well.

    15. Re:I was just reading by malignant_minded · · Score: 1

      The no-cd and cracks are illegal

       
      Actually no-cd's are not illegal that is why places like gamecopyworld exist.

    16. Re:I was just reading by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      FYI, no-cd's aren't illegal in most countries.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    17. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logic: You're doing it wrong.

      Anyone that close to a politician for instance, who does not know what is going on, is either lying, or has an IQ lower than his shoe size.

      You can't make a conclusion like this based strictly on your premise without creating a false dilemma. Depending on the person in question, a page (typically a youth) could very well not know what is going on simply because of ignorance and a clear lack of understanding. You cannot hold a 10 year-old child to the same level of reasoning and understanding an average adult maintains. Since the myth does not clearly identify the age of the page in question, and even if the page was at a reasonable age (say 17-18), it is still possible the page was completely ignorant to the greed around him because the monk was successfully able to conseal the money and wealth from the page.

    18. Re:I was just reading by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      NO-CD's are a type of electronic lock as stated in the DMCA.
      Sites that have NO-CD cracks are infringing on the DMCA.
      NO-CD's also infringe on copyright as derivative work, as seen in the Glider case.

      Conclusion: cracks and NO-CD binaries are illegal.

      --
    19. Re:I was just reading by M8e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Usa is not "most countries".

    20. Re:I was just reading by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      @Creepy Crawler (680178) Did you notice how he said "most countries?" The DMCA only applies in one.

    21. Re:I was just reading by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Which illustrates my point. As soon as the barrier between lawful and unlawful behavior is no longer accepted as just, a determination of "fair game" for one act spreads to circumstantially related acts.

      It goes from "I'll get you," to "and your little dog, too."

      You forgot "my pretty". That's the best part!

    22. Re:I was just reading by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      ... in certain countries. Believe it or not, we're not living in the United States of Earth.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    23. Re:I was just reading by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Did you forget to tick the AC box?

    24. Re:I was just reading by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      Killing the page was considered quite as merry and shrewd.

      You'd think that a servant such as that would have flexible morals/loyalties.

      I guess it's just as well, tho because "turn the page" would take on a whole new meaning.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    25. Re:I was just reading by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The law does not deserve our automatic respect. The law does not deserve our unquestioning obedience. The law does not issue from divinity, nor does it necessarily reflect the will of the people.

      Yes, people are quite flagrantly breaking the law of the land as it is written. The question is; is the law just. In the case of copyright law, the answer is no. It is clear that copyrights laws, and the fines imposed under them, are injust. Faced with this, there is a very serious question as to whether that law should be observed or respected at all.

      You are correct though. Lack of respect for some laws leads to lack of respect for the law in general, and that can and has lead to the breakdown of society. But what you have failed to realise is that a general lack of respect for the law is caused by unjust laws. It's true. People are smart enough to realise when they are being had. The truth is that unjust laws do more to undermine our legal system than any amount of teenagers downloading files off the internet.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    26. Re:I was just reading by Digital+End · · Score: 1

      Screw PETA... mod me troll if you want, but that group of idiots needs to be ended

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    27. Re:I was just reading by michaelmuffin · · Score: 1

      how innocent is someone who is immediately attached to a corrupt official?

      Anyone that close to a politician for instance, who does not know what is going on, is either lying, or has an IQ lower than his shoe size.

      and therefore deserves to die for it? i wouldn't say so. ignorance or mental retardedness is no reason to execute someone. merely lying isn't such a good reason either

    28. Re:I was just reading by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      how innocent is someone who is immediately attached to a corrupt official?

      Anyone that close to a politician for instance, who does not know what is going on, is either lying, or has an IQ lower than his shoe size.

      and therefore deserves to die for it? i wouldn't say so. ignorance or mental retardedness is no reason to execute someone. merely lying isn't such a good reason either

      My point is he is NOT ignorant of what is going on.

      He has actively attached himself to that official to profit from the corruption.

      He's feeding the system and just as guilty.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    29. Re:I was just reading by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      I think you're misunderstanding him.  He's not saying that's how it should be, but that's how it is.  It's a warning against allowing the law to become an ass.

    30. Re:I was just reading by Zamerick · · Score: 1

      Peta and Greenpeace both go over board on a regular basis

    31. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mIRC is awesome, I wish death upon your tribe.

    32. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my dealer lives around the corner: just because something exists does not make it legal.

    33. Re:I was just reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is that unjust laws do more to undermine our legal system than any amount of teenagers downloading files off the internet.

      You almost had it correct, but you missed it in a "mad rush" to rationalizing copyright infringement.

      The truth is that while unjust laws *do* undermine a legal system, what damages it more are those that believe them to be so, yet do nothing to change them for the better. Naturally, many/most here are going to disagree: The concept of civic duty and the obligations of citizenship aren't taught anymore, you see, at least not in the US public school system.

      And that, of course, is why the US is slowing losing its status: Its citizens no longer take responsibility for its federal government nor that government's actions on their behalf. I say that as a US citizen, by the way.

    34. Re:I was just reading by Caedes.Leighton · · Score: 0

      "The lesson you claim is false and dangerous, and you are actively undermining people's understanding of humanity, compassion and morality."

      You do realise murder and extortion are much more common than compassion or morality?
      If you're trying to tell anyone that people are more likely to be nice than to screw you over, then that would be false and dangerous as well.

    35. Re:I was just reading by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Except in robin hood mythology they fought for basic justice, food, and shelter. Here you are fighting for Mariah Carey mp3s and Wayans Bros movies. Something tells me there's a fundamental difference between these things.

      Books constitute capital. A library book lasts as long as a house, for hundreds of years. It is not, then, an article of mere consumption but fairly of capital, and often in the case of professional men, setting out in life, it is their only capital.
      --Thomas Jefferson

      To varying degrees the works that come under copyright protection can be considered capital. Certainly the issue has come up regarding the digital copying of books, but there is a lot of educational and political material being released as video as well. It is about basic justice and property rights. Anyone who thinks this is just about entertainment hasn't been paying attention. The Right to Read is a good place to begin informing yourself.

    36. Re:I was just reading by dw604 · · Score: 1

      I tried to expand your sig to see in more detail why someone would recommend modding you up. :P In fact, I only clicked because of the time - dead give-away!

    37. Re:I was just reading by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Once defying the law becomes seen as just and right, fine distinctions like between a corrupt church official and an innocent child witness go out the window."

      Right and wrong are purely a matter of what is in fashion at the time, and at that time youth were not some special protected species who were allowed to do anything they liked without punishment.

      It should also be considered that if an entity, such as the Church, was sufficiently toxic there was no reason not to wipe out all of its personnel. A page was a trainee, on the way to becoming what the merry men would need to kill and therefore NOT innocent.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    38. Re:I was just reading by Lightlord · · Score: 1

      When the law becomes abusive, it's too much to expect that resistance to it take the form of highly principled disobedience

      and thats why Gandhi is admired much

    39. Re:I was just reading by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      I'd say that they are, since they are derivative works of original code. If they were distributed as patch as they were in the days of old, then they would be legal (on countries without DMCA-like laws).

    40. Re:I was just reading by michaelmuffin · · Score: 1

      Anyone that close to a politician for instance, who does not know what is going on, is either lying, or has an IQ lower than his shoe size.

      and therefore deserves to die for it? i wouldn't say so. ignorance or mental retardedness is no reason to execute someone. merely lying isn't such a good reason either

      My point is he is NOT ignorant of what is going on.

      yes, i misread your post. my eyeballs went right around `, who'. i still maintain however that someone close to a corrupt official who is too dumb to understand the evil of the actions that the corrupt official asks them to perform does not deserve to be executed. someone that dumb and weak is just as much a victim of the corrupt official as everyone else

    41. Re:I was just reading by Mjec · · Score: 1

      Greenpeace go over board on a regular basis

      Only when the French are around...

      --
      "But everyone should know everything." -markab
  12. hobbies by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

    My hobbies include &ndash too!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:hobbies by Wee · · Score: 1

      Seriously... just use a normal - like everyone else. Or, if you're feeling fancy, try two of them: --

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    2. Re:hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he was talking about the RSS entry (He probably uses firefox to get slashdot RSS feeds, like me).

      The RSS feed entry goes: "The Pirate Bay "Just a Very Large Hob..."

    3. Re:hobbies by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1

      Nope, he was talking about the story of the title which contained "&ndash" instead of the dash at first.

    4. Re:hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if you want to be in compliance with GNU's long options. :P

      J

  13. Hobby on, dudes! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... and keep sticking a weed up The Man's ass!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  14. Eh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When people say it's not about the money, it's generally about the money. Sorry, TPB guys, but I don't believe you're not making a *phenomenal* amount of money from this thing. Note that they say they are IT "consultants", they don't have a normal day 9-5 job.

    Which is great -- more power to them for making money -- but I don't buy this whole "we're just normal guys havin' a bit of fun" crap. They know that if they're seen as making tremendous profit from the work of others, they'll be seen a lot differently, socially and legally.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Eh by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sorry, TPB guys, but I don't believe you're not making a *phenomenal* amount of money from this thing.

      I can quite readily believe they're not making money doing it. Where's the funding going to come from? Advertising? Well, maybe, but (a) all advertisers know that TPB's audience consists by definition of people too cheap to pay for stuff, (b) most mainstream firms probably won't want to be seen as associated with such a notorious site, and (c) I bet the frequency of Adblock Plus among TPB users is pretty damn high.

      I suppose they sell the odd bit of merchandise from the kopimi store, but that must only barely cover their costs.

      Full disclosure: I don't actually have the faintest idea what kind of advertisements they show on TPB. Adblock Plus, y'see. So I suppose it could be argued that I'm pirating TPB itself :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Eh by gsslay · · Score: 1, Interesting

      more power to them for making money

      So there is absolutely no moral case for saying that the money their making properly belongs to the musicians who create the content?

      These guys are leeches. Artificial middlemen not just creaming off the profit from others' labour, but removing every last penny and walking off with it.

      And no, saying that the Music Industry is no better is no defence. Two wrongs do not make a right, and at least the music industry pays royalties. What do these guys contribute other than crap about being regular guys indulging a hobby?

    3. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note that they say they are IT "consultants", they don't have a normal day 9-5 job.

      Probably a bad translation. Over here, the work "konsult" can mean either "consultant" or "contractor".

    4. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A website? You know, the one people want to get the trackers from?

      That's what they contribute. What's slashdot or TFA's site contributing except crap about these regular guys indulging a hobby, and a bunch more crap about other guys doing other different stuff?

      They get the $ from advertising, so your beef is with any ad-funded site with unoriginal content then?

    5. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So there is absolutely no moral case for saying that the money their making properly belongs to the musicians who create the content?

      (Disregarding that musicians are not the only ones creating content on TPB)

      Not if you ask me - Copies of The Content has zero marginal cost. Providing communication for distributing copies has marginal cost.

    6. Re:Eh by Hatta · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the artists want their share of whatever profits these guys make from free downloads, the artists should create a free download site and steal their business. The fact is, most musicians simply aren't willing to compete in that arena. If they want to leave that money on the table, it's hard to blame TPB for taking it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Eh by Grym · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These guys are leeches. Artificial middlemen not just creaming off the profit from others' labour, but removing every last penny and walking off with it.

      You realize the irony of this statement, right? Taken out if its anti-TPB rant, it quite easily applies to the Recording industry distributors. In fact, it almost better applies to them because TPB's so-called profits and effect on music sales are pretty questionable. Whereas the coercive and immoral contracts of the music distributors are widely accepted facts.

      What do these guys contribute other than crap about being regular guys indulging a hobby?

      The Pirate Bay provides a very valuable service. It excels at displaying what an immoral farce copyright laws and globalization have become. It is a modern day speakeasy. The fact that they STILL (after years of press) get threatening DMCA requests, which do not and should not apply to them (being that they aren't subjects of the United States government) is very telling.

      Blowback. If you clampdown too hard, people will resist. Hard enough, and they will revolt and maybe even seek revenge--justified or not. U.S. Copyright law has progressed far beyond its constitutional mandate. Article 1 section 8, clause 8 states the following: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." And yet, "limited time" has come to mean 75 years AFTER the death of the author. There have been serious arguments made in on the congressional floor to construe "limited times" as infinity minus one day. In what reasonable way is that "limited"? Furthermore, there are countless examples where modern copyright and patent laws serve only to obstruct progress. Rarely do stated arguments even involve the actual mandate of patents and copyrights anymore. We speak in terms of losses to artists and inventors despite the fact that this is rarely ever the actual case (most copyrights and patents are held by multinational corporations) and not the intended focus of these protections.

      "Intellectual Property" laws have become tools of oppression and exploitation. It should not be surprising that people are resisting them, even if such resistance has ulterior self-serving motive.

      -Grym

    8. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think artists should all get day jobs, and quit crying about getting paid

    9. Re:Eh by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sorry, the songs have all been BROADCAST! They have been on the radio, you can record them and play them back at your leisure. The Internet just makes this easier on a massive scale.

      The recording industry and musicians have NOT tried to keep their songs secret. Back in the day when the only way to listen to a song whenever you wanted to was to buy the LP, selling LP's made sense. Now selling/leasing/licensing songs doesn't make sense. I can transfer a song from here to Australia for no incremental cost in my broadband. No one had to burn a CD, ship something, carry inventory, or anything else for this to happen ... so why do they expect to make a margin on it?

      If the musician comes to my town maybe I'll plunk down $120 for two tix to see him live, $50 for a t-shirt. If I really like him then maybe I'll buy a CD so I can get a quality lossless copy and album cover, or a poster for my room. But this stuff that has already been broadcast on the airwaves for free? I'm not paying for it.

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    10. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All money they make is incidental and not direct.
      They're not charging for subscriptions, they're providing a free service. Their only income is from advertising and emergency donations. If this makes them money

      You make it sound like they're just the same as the guys burning warez off of the net, then selling the discs on the corner for a profit. This, in turn, makes you sound like an entertainment industry shill.

    11. Re:Eh by gilgongo · · Score: 0

      These guys are leeches. Artificial middlemen not just creaming off the profit from others' labour, but removing every last penny and walking off with it.

      Are you saying TPB divert money to themselves that would have otherwise gone to artists? How is that happening exactly?

      Is there no case to say that by allowing free and highly efficient distribution of artists work, they are in fact facilitating the conditions in which artists can escape obscurity and stand a chance of earning money they would not have otherwise got?

      I for one would prefer millionaires made from helping any and all artists reach an audience (or die trying) than millionaires made from deciding which artists I should know about and which I should not.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    12. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must be making a *phenomenal* off all those visitors who are looking for FREE movies, software, etc. Just the audience advertisers want to target!

    13. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, *I* support your comment. As an independent software developer, it always leaves me feeling used and run-over whenever I read the comments on Slashdot that have to do with copyright or paying the artist. It's dismally sad.

    14. Re:Eh by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      As someone who has personally donated to TPB website I think you're wrong.

      These guys have put a lot of work into this. They have to run servers, back ups, defend themselves in court and to some extent put their lives on the line to defend their country's laws.

      Just browse the legal page on TPB and it'll give you some idea of how these lawyers think that US law == world law. Even on slashdot we have articles that go on and on about software patents but it's irrelevant to me. In some ways I wish there was a "piratebay" for software patents in the UK to highlight these points. Why doesn't Ubuntu just put whatever software patents it wants in. It's all UK based right? what's the fear? It's US oppression on the rest of the world and someone is standing up to it.

      My personal favourite is this series of letters.

      More specifically..

      with us now having currently had over 250K + full album downloads removed from torrent sites, has almost bankrupted our company and sadly the artist and myself personally, not to mention many other small independent labels and artists worldwide.

      and then the exact same guy says this in the last email..

      I am a millionaire and do not claim to be bankrupt.

      So there you go..

    15. Re:Eh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      As someone who has personally donated to TPB website I think you're wrong.

      Not to pick on you, but this is a kind of cognitive dissonance that a lot of people have when it comes to TPB. Look at all that you posted to somehow prove to me that TPB are moral champions of justice. BUT -- None of that says anything about how much money they make!!

      Feel free to give money to them, respect what they do, whatever you like. But you have no idea how much money they're socking away from all this. And neither do I, but given how much money link farms typically make through advertising, and the fact that TPB is one of the biggest sites in the world, I think it's reasonable to assume it's considerable, even after subtracting their expenses.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    16. Re:Eh by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      You said..

      None of that says anything about how much money they make!!

      I said..

      These guys have put a lot of work into this. They have to run servers, back ups, defend themselves in court and to some extent put their lives on the line to defend their country's laws.

      Don't do your research on slashdot, if you want to know how much money they make, read their blogs!

    17. Re:Eh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I said..

      You said they have expenses. So what? That doesn't mean it isn't profitable.

      Don't do your research on slashdot, if you want to know how much money they make, read their blogs!

      Since you seem to be familiar with it, link to the place where they state exactly how much money is coming in.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    18. Re:Eh by kz45 · · Score: 1

      "You realize the irony of this statement, right? Taken out if its anti-TPB rant, it quite easily applies to the Recording industry distributors. In fact, it almost better applies to them because TPB's so-called profits and effect on music sales are pretty questionable. Whereas the coercive and immoral contracts of the music distributors are widely accepted facts. "

      so-called profits?

      This article says otherwise:

      http://rixstep.com/1/20060708,00.shtml

      If you google it, the guys that run TPB have stated that they have made similar amounts over the years. However, I'm not sure how much bandwidth costs.

      It's also an accepted fact that before you sign a contract, you need to read the fine-print.

      "Intellectual Property" laws have become tools of oppression and exploitation. It should not be surprising that people are resisting them, even if such resistance has ulterior self-serving motive."

      I know, because you are sooooooooooo oppressed when you can't download half-life for free or the latest metallica album.

      When there is a good reason to violate copyright law besides a thinly veiled argument for getting free shit...people might actually start to listen. Otherwise it will only mean more DRM like protection schemes.

    19. Re:Eh by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Copies of The Content has zero marginal cost.

      Creating the original content in the first place is part of the marginal cost. It doesn't create itself.

    20. Re:Eh by gsslay · · Score: 1

      You realize the irony of this statement, right?

      You realise that the very next sentence in my post addressed that, right? You know, the one you carefully extracted from your quote?

    21. Re:Eh by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Are you saying TPB divert money to themselves that would have otherwise gone to artists? How is that happening exactly?

      Happy to explain. By facilitating the distribution of artists' work at no cost to the end consumer they are undermining the market in which the artists' work is sold to the end consumer. End consumer behaviour is almost always observed to favour the least cost alternative, particularly when the product on sale is virtually identical. Consequently the artist get less money for their work due to an unlicensed distribution channel that they cannot possibly compete with. They are bearing all the cost of production, while the unlicensed distribution channel has none. In the meanwhile, the unlicensed distribution channel is gaining profit through advertising to an audience that has been drawn in on the back of the artists work. The artist sees nothing of this money either.

      How is this fair?

    22. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this fair?

      It's not a fair, it's a free market.

    23. Re:Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, it almost better applies to them because TPB's so-called profits and effect on music sales are pretty questionable. Whereas the coercive and immoral contracts of the music distributors are widely accepted facts.

      The difference is that, as a content producer, I can choose to enter into a contract with a music distributor. It's much harder to attain rock-star status without such a contact, but I can make that decision myself. On the other hand, The Pirate Bay doesn't give me that option. If someone creates an unauthorized torrent my work and TPB tracks it, I have absolutely no say in the process. Even if I were to contact them to ask them not to track my torrent, they would ridicule and ignore me. I have no input in the matter.

      I'm an indie artist and I would rather have a choice. That choice may be to provide a torrent of my work as some artists have done, but it would be my choice.

      "Intellectual Property" laws have become tools of oppression and exploitation. It should not be surprising that people are resisting them, even if such resistance has ulterior self-serving motive.

      In some cases, IP laws are used as tools of oppression, such as claiming the text of a law is "copyrighted". In the cases we're talking about, torrenting the latest pop album, there is no oppression. Those "ulterior self-serving motives" are actually the primary issue; otherwise people would seek out and support independent artist instead of downloading the latest commercial product that's "so awful it's not worth paying for." We're not talking about things like vital information that the public deserves to know.

      Let's accept that most copyright violators aren't doing it for a moral cause. They just want free shit. Most people like free shit, but that doesn't mean it's a moral strike for freedom even the majority of time someone torrents something.

      This isn't to say that IP laws are perfect and couldn't use a lot of reform. But, the solution to getting the goverment to stop considering "infinitiy minus a day" as "limited" isn't to torrent crap, it's getting involved in politics. Oh, but that involves real work when it's so much easier to want free shit and bitch about moral freedoms on Slashdot.

    24. Re:Eh by Mjec · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, the songs have all been BROADCAST! They have been on the radio, you can record them and play them back at your leisure. The Internet just makes this easier on a massive scale.

      I hope you realise that radio stations have to pay for broadcast licenses [.au site] to do this, right? And that time shifting radio broadcast is only legal for limited playback (i.e. it is not designed to allow you to create a collection ref [pdf .au]). Copyright collection societies exist for precisely this reason.

      I don't like the way copyright law operates at the moment; it's out-dated. That doesn't mean it shouldn't exist at all and it doesn't mean that we're entitled to copy anything for free.

      --
      "But everyone should know everything." -markab
    25. Re:Eh by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Don't do your research on slashdot, if you want to know how much money they make, read their blogs!

      You won't reply to Reality Master's request for a link, because you don't have one. These guys don't list their expenses and revenue. They funnel their money via offshore accounts. Why do you think that is? It's pretty naive to think a site as large as TPB can't make money from advertising.

    26. Re:Eh by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Actually it's because I just didn't bother to come back and read his reply.

    27. Re:Eh by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      they are undermining the market in which the artists' work is sold to the end consumer

      You say "the market in which the artists' work is sold." I think you may be confusing artists with publishers. The point is that for artists, TPB clearly offers a new route to market. Artists (traditionally) don't bear costs of distribution - they sell some of their assumed worth to a separate industry (publishing) to bear that cost. Artists like Radiohead and Trent Reznor have perhaps made a great deal of money from bypassing their publishers and going to their fans directly over the net, but it's far too early to say whether that might work for others.

      Be that as it may, do you have any evidence to show that the market is in fact being undermined? If so, please cite it. My own research indicates that it's still far from clear whether illegal downloads have brought about a decrease in revenues from music overall (as opposed to just one facet of it, like CDs).

      I suspect the assumption that every illegal download is a lost sale is in fact incorrect. When it comes to music, and possibly other media too, it's a very substitutable commodity - if Duke Ellington doesn't do it then Fats Domino might just as well. Can you disprove the possibility that in having access to free and unregulated distribution, artists may find audiences, and more importantly, subsequent revenue streams, that they might otherwise not have had? Certainly, if you talk to most artists (as opposed to their publishers) about money, they'll tell you it's live performances and merchandising that makes them the bulk of their income. There also appears to be a great deal of music being made and listened to now - perhaps more than ever before if you include worldwide markets just getting a foothold (Korean metal, Indian pop, etc.). This is partly due to lower costs of recording and the rise of new genres - but also not doubt in some way cheap distribution. If the "lost sale" argument held, you would not expect that to be the case. Less profit for distributors maybe, but for many artists, selling recorded music isn't the be all and end all, and hasn't been for the last 20 years. We must also not forget other factors that the likes of TPB may facilitate such as the re-discovery of music that would otherwise be lost to traditional strictures of back catalogues and sales targets. All these things combine to enrich and diversify music and art to create more art, and ultimately more money for artists.

      Bear in mind though I fully accept that in deregulated free distribution channels, many artists may find no audiences and no money. That, I am afraid, is life. There is no divine right to make money from your art if nobody pays it any attention. So, perhaps the opposite idea is also true: many established artists today would never have found audiences had they only been given the type of distribution that TPB allows. Who is to say that in a parallel world, Britney Spears is not working in McDonalds?

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    28. Re:Eh by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1

      When I bought my radio I didn't sign anything saying I wouldn't record what I hear on it and then share those recordings with others.

      I feel no moral obligation to not record what I hear on the radio and share it. When the Internet makes the sharing easy, I think that's great. When the Internet makes recording the songs easy, I think that's great.

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
  15. A very large hobby... by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...which they make a shitton of money out of.

    Hmm.

  16. Any swedes willing to translate? by etnoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Peter Sunde alias brokep, recently wrote an excellent essay about how TPB has been treated by Swedish media. For those who (like me) can read Swedish, the link is provided here.

    I don't have the energy to translate it right now, but if any other Swede would like to, please do. Until that, try the google translation

    --
    Quantum hacker.
    1. Re:Any swedes willing to translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can it be the the blog of TPB's webmaster is /.-ed?

    2. Re:Any swedes willing to translate? by Milkyfresh · · Score: 1

      I don't have the energy to translate it right now, but if any other Swede would like to, please do. Until that, try the google translation

      Google doesn't seem to like that. I get this error - "The page you requested attempted to redirect to itself, which could cause an infinite loop."

      So I copied and pasted just the text for the translator, here are the results:

      Now I am tired of this. My respect for the media has disappeared, I do not understand what has happened.

      Today I have been in the TV program SVT Notebook. And I am sick disappointed. Now I will explain how it is to be a part of The Pirate Bay. I'm really upset and this needs to be emptied out of me.

      Last week I was on holiday in Iceland with my girlfriend. First holiday for quite a long time that did not include any element of being part of Pirate Bay. On Friday, I get a call from TV4 - caller to my cell phone, though I did not give them the number. They ask myself the question - "Why have you released pictures of dead children on your site?". I am Question's what the girl says on the phone and she explains that there is a records linked via TPB.

      In FUP'en so there is obviously an autopsy materials and the victims' father had been sorry that it was on the Internet. Quite understandably, but unfortunately what happens when the paper becomes public. Such as TPB in the case.

      I try to explain to TV4s journalist - "if there is any such material linked to the TPB, it is a USER who has re-released material, there is not anyone in the TPB to do it. TPB serves as yellow pages and has a list of numbers they can contact to find the material. We have not selected the material will be, made by users altogether. " Supplementary questions will, on different things, and three hours later, so be it trombone in the Swedish media in Sweden - "The Pirate Bay has released pictures of dead children on its website." TV4 knowingly makes a lie to the truth and it makes a huge media impact.

      In the days that follow, we try to explain to people how the Internet works. We may also be responsible for everything that is available on the internet. Since the Internet is a replica of the traditional society as it is after all the inhabitants of both worlds, so it means that in practice, we must represent all evil. It is a role we often had before when our opponents (as is often the same media who report on us) think it suits their purpose well. The Swedish Radio I get called a terrorist by Ekots most respected journalists, something that previously only been Bert Karlsson reserved.

      People believe in the lies and wonder why TPB choose to post any material on the Internet, which consists of pictures of dead children. It will attack, the death threats both by phone and e-mails, threatening to have his skull cracked with a sledgehammer. Then it will be time for the next lie: "The father has been e-mailing TPB to remove the photos and met with orespektfulla response." But - it was not the father. It was the partner. Without explaining who she was. And not an e-mail, but the 60 pcs. From various e-mail addresses (aka spam). Some right unpleasant, and they first received the usual response if the policy. In the end, so varnished our moderator out of everything spammande and writes them fateful words - "It was a fucking nyah, no, no and no again." I honestly can understand that it is responsible for a lot of spam from a stubborn person who does not explained his original position, or who have been especially nice. Especially if you are a young guy who burns for what you tweaking and face a wall of ignorance. It was produced in the media that we in the TPB is totally disconnected from the emotion and morality. Nothing could be further from the truth but there is no chance to show people how it is.

      In

    3. Re:Any swedes willing to translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the blog is run on different servers the TPB. It's primarily meant to inform users of news in case the main servers get seized again.

    4. Re:Any swedes willing to translate? by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

      Sweden - Grow Up!

      Now I'm getting tired of this. My respect for the media has disappeared, and I don't quite understand what has happened.

      Today I was on the TV program SVT Debatt. And I am sick with disappointment. Now I would like to explain how it is to be a part of The Pirate Bay. I am really upset and this needs to come out.

      Last week I was on vacation in Iceland with my girlfriend. It was the first trip in quite a long time that had nothing to do with being part of The Pirate Bay. On Friday I got a call from TV4 - who called my cell phone but I had not given out that number. They put to me the question "Why have you published pictures of murdered children on your home page!?". In trying to determine what the woman on the telephone meant, she explained that there is a preliminary police investigation connected with TPB.

      Evidently there is material from the autopsy, and the victim's father became quite upset over the fact that it is available on the internet. Very understandable, but unfortunately this can happen when public documents are released. Like for example in the TPB case itself.

      I'm trying to explain to TV4's journalist, "If there is some such material linked on TPB it is a USER that has published the material, there is not something TPB has done. TPB works like the Yellow Pages, and has a list of numbers and contacts where material can be found. We have not chosen any material there, it is done by the users wholly and entirely." A few follow-up questions came, about different things, and three hours later this was broadcast out on Swedish national media: "The Pirate Bay has published pictures of murdered children on its home page." TV4 lied, fully aware of the truth, and it got big media as a result.

      In the days that follow we try explaining to people how the internet works. We even got to take responsibility for everything that exists on the entire internet. Since the internet is a parallel of regular society, despite having the same inhabitants in both worlds, it means we practitioners often have to represent the painful side [to lay folks]. There is a role we often play lately, to be the adversary (just like the media that reports about us), and I think it suits their purposes. On Sveriges Radio I've been called a terrorist by one of "The Echo"'s most respected journalists, something that only later became conditional according to Bert Karlsson.

      Oh well I got a few paragraphs done...

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
  17. Very large?.... by Angostura · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... , or "avast"?

    1. Re:Very large?.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. The Best Things in Life are Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but all good things (that can be attacked by the RIAA/MPAA will) come to an end.

    As much as I love Pirate Bay, the central website model can't last.

    Systems like Cubit seem promising. Hopefully in a years time we'll have moved to a more distributed model for torrent file search and delivery.

    1. Re:The Best Things in Life are Free... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As much as I love Pirate Bay, the central website model can't last.

      I don't see why not. The Internet is still growing, but America's hegemony is in decline. Is the day going to come when the USA at the behest of its media cartels successfully enforces its law on every nation? If not, all that has to happen is that someone in a free country sets up a tracker index.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  19. Re:missing semicolon by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

    An endash isn't even typographically acceptable there. It should be an emdash.

    Wow, typography humor. That's something you don't see every day. =)

    Next, an in depth discussion on kerning. ;-)

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  20. News for pirates, torrents that matters ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I hate the **AA almost as much as the average Slashdotter, I'm feeling a bit uneasy by reading this kind of news. That's one thing to criticize the whole IP scam that companies are trying to bring down to our throats, but it's another thing to sanctify torrent sites and treat their owners as if they were part of some sort of Jet-Set. What's next ? A new about how mininova's top uploader got laid ? How can we be taken seriously when fighting against the copyright nazis with news like this ? On the other hand, most of the torrent sites I use where discovered by realing Slashdot :)

    1. Re:News for pirates, torrents that matters ? by Bragador · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You attach to much importance to appearances.

    2. Re:News for pirates, torrents that matters ? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      You feel that you are currently being taken seriously by the copyright "nazis"? Well, up until this story, I mean.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:News for pirates, torrents that matters ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember that Swedish copyright law is not U.S. copyright law. The major thing to note is that while other legal systems are different, they are also completely functional.

  21. Re:missing semicolon by etnoy · · Score: 1

    Hm... the /. front page as well as this page's title still shows "&ndash"

    --
    Quantum hacker.
  22. Re:missing semicolon by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    As long as we're being pedantic, it should be an "em dash" (two words).

    Some style guides do allow the use of the en dash surrounded by space, although the predominant english guides suggest using em dash without surround spaces.

    It also hasn't been completely fixed, it's still missing the semicolon in the title element.

    --

    -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  23. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, there are several articles putting Peter Sunde (brokep) in the same context as one of the main uploaders, Tiamo. (http://thepiratebay.org/user/TiAMO/)

    Secondly, if this is a non-profit hobby-business. Why do they need a outsourced (tax-free, tax is very high in sweden) israeli company to run their advertising network (slack copyright laws there)?

    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had bothered to RTFA at all, you would know that they barely cover expenses and aren't actually a business at all.

  24. Re:missing semicolon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody gives a fuck. Really.

  25. Re:They're taking it back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet sweden pest control you!

  26. The Sinai Desert? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 4, Funny

    And their favorite film is Donnie Darko, about a human with powers over time?

    Crap. We've got a couple of Fremen-in-training here. Arrest them before they can cut off the flow of spice!

  27. Re:First? by reallyjoel · · Score: 1

    I doubt that. I remember hearing Sunde on the radio two weeks ago where he said that they just barely broke even. And I frankly don't see where they would get wads of cash from, ad revenue is not great, and there are maintenence costs.

  28. Re:First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet, I'm in VB. Post some pics on 4chan so I can decide if shes worth it.

  29. I`m a "regular guy" too. by ZDRuX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I run a music torrent tracker. People are more than happy to pay me for the great service I provide which according to the users, is 100 times better than they commercial offering out there. And nobody is calling me names because I make a few bucks to pay for the server. I have record labels coming to me asking if I can "secretly" release their un-released tracks on my tracker and make it look like they've been pirated by a "warez" group so it looks authentic, because more people will download "unreleased" material and they`ll get the word out about their label. I have also been contacted by bigger labels asking me if I'd be nice enough to remove a specific song they've released because it`ll be a big money maker, and I do. None of these people including the labels and the artists want to go to court, and they're quite happy with having some of their stuff released on trackers, as long as the people downloading the tracks think otherwise. A lot of this stuff is NOT what it seems, and a lot of the times - labels and artists are on "our" side, but they can't say it and have to depend on my discretion. Many big-name artists have an account on my tracker, and have many gigs of downloads and uploads.. you have to remember, they are also "users" just like you and me. So this whole image of owners of the pirate bay being money-grabbing hooligans is absolutely out of whack, I`m a regular guy, you are - and so are they.

    --
    The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:I`m a "regular guy" too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I fight bad guys at night and am a billionaire.

    2. Re:I`m a "regular guy" too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can attest that this has been the business model for a long time.

      I spent many years working as a bartender in various clubs, etc.
      There were many times that the record labels would send a rep into the bar with a pile of "pirated" singles (cassettes, ya I know getoffmylawn) that weren't released.
      Sometimes they would even come in with a single that had two versions of the recording, because they wanted to see which mix the crowds liked better before banking on a big manufacturing run.

      They were very clear about what they wanted- they wanted people to think those singles were somehow stolen, etc. before release, because it makes them more 'enticing' - if they actually put their name on the release people just say "huh, it's free so it must be crap".

      The music industry has long supported the bootleg scene with one hand, while giving the finger (thumb to you Brits) with the other.

    3. Re:I`m a "regular guy" too. by giuda · · Score: 1

      Simply awesome. Which tracker do you run? Maybe I am an user too... :)

    4. Re:I`m a "regular guy" too. by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      while giving the finger (thumb to you Brits) with the other

      Somewhat off-topic of me, but I'm curious - where on earth did you hear "giving the thumb"? I'm a brit, and I've never heard that expression before in my life.

    5. Re:I`m a "regular guy" too. by ZDRuX · · Score: 1

      TranceTraffic, it's an EDM (Electronic Dance Music) tracker.

      --
      The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:I`m a "regular guy" too. by giuda · · Score: 1

      Mmm, not my kind of music. But keep up the good work! :)

  30. Re:First? by genner · · Score: 4, Funny

    (late 20s, white, cute to average)

    Cute to average.....dang I'm too good looking for the job I guess.

  31. Re:First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post a link to pics and I'll get back to you.

  32. Oh really? How much have you paid them recently? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Sorry, TPB guys, but I don't believe you're not making a *phenomenal* amount of money from this thing.

    Oh yeah? How much money have you given them? Did you buy a tee-shirt or something? If its just a matter of selling ad banners, then I can see them perhaps doing as they say; breaking even. TPB isn't Google by a long stretch. It also sounds like they're paying tax on their income. And anyway, aren't the criminals those who download stuff? I guess the Swedish government could nail the TPB guys for being an accessory to a crime. If it's even a crime to share data, which has yet to be properly established as far as I can see.

    Still, I wouldn't be surprised if these guys eventually went to prison. The Swedish government has already invested significant time and resources in their destruction, and after a while it's no longer about who's right and wrong, it's about satisfying egos and justifying one's job. And not being an embarrassment on the world stage. The TPB guys are playing with fire. If the Swedes are ineffective, then I can see private agents 'removing' the problem. Everybody knows Hollywood has no soul.

    -FL

  33. Over $20k/month according to some calculations by Phoz · · Score: 1

    This was in 2006:

    After several Swedish magazines attempted to calculate advertising revenues for Pirate Bay, Svenska Dagbladet said that the advertising revenues for the past four months reached 600000 SEK (84000 USD or 65400 EUR). This information was provided to the magazine from the advertising company Eastpoint Media. Svenska Dagbladet reminds that in reality even larger sums are involved. Pirate Bay operates internationally and advertising sales are therefore also international and being sold by more companies than only Eastpoint Media.

    Not too shabby.

    1. Re:Over $20k/month according to some calculations by Eudial · · Score: 1

      This was in 2006:

      After several Swedish magazines attempted to calculate advertising revenues for Pirate Bay, Svenska Dagbladet said that the advertising revenues for the past four months reached 600000 SEK (84000 USD or 65400 EUR). This information was provided to the magazine from the advertising company Eastpoint Media. Svenska Dagbladet reminds that in reality even larger sums are involved. Pirate Bay operates internationally and advertising sales are therefore also international and being sold by more companies than only Eastpoint Media.

      Not too shabby.

      On the other hand, that calculation does not take into account what they spend running servers for a major international website with millions of users every day (both HTTP and BitTorrent). It doesn't that big of a leap of the imagination to imagine that costing a fair bit.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:Over $20k/month according to some calculations by Raenex · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, that calculation does not take into account what they spend running servers for a major international website with millions of users every day (both HTTP and BitTorrent).

      They don't host the BitTorrent files themselves -- they just provide links. Their expenses are minimal.

  34. Nothing more than glorification by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yet another in a long line of pro-piracy articles from Slashdot over the years. Nobody wants to talk about the artists getting ripped off because of that site. Everyone wants to joke about how "down to earth" its owners are. Everyone wants to scapegoat media companies to make them the bad guys in the narrative instead of the pirates ripping artists off. Everyone wants to forget that artists willingly sign their contracts.

    Piracy is nothing more than freeloading. It's the total opposite of OSS in that you're not giving anything back to the community. Much worse, you're completely disregarding the human being who worked so hard to make a product to make a living off of. You genuinely don't give a shit, because it's free and it's easy to get. Software developers, musicians, filmmakers, authors, and so on--"Fuck their rights!"

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Nothing more than glorification by bky1701 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yet another in a long line of pro-piracy articles from Slashdot over the years. Nobody wants to talk about the artists getting ripped off because of that site. Everyone wants to joke about how "down to earth" its owners are.

      If not that site, it would be another. I fail to see why we should demonize the owners.

      Everyone wants to scapegoat media companies to make them the bad guys in the narrative instead of the pirates ripping artists off.

      The media companies have been lobbying the government(s) to create more laws further expanding copyright and their control over their copyrights. I hate to break this to you, but copyright has nothing to do with helping artists. It never did. Copyright was intended as a means to promote creation of art, which would enter the public domain in a set number of years. Copyright was created to help society, not artists.

      Yet now we have the communistic handwringers who believe that copyright is a god-given right to have a stranglehold on your creations, of any kind, and profit from it no matter what. They associate intellectual property with physical property, which is an incredibly bad generalization on both sides. Not only does it grant ownership of ideas (which should be a concerning prospect), but it lowers the value of real property. How long before someone "pirates" your car, and no one cares, because there are so many more file sharers that need brought to justice?

      Everyone wants to forget that artists willingly sign their contracts.

      Which is the problem. As above, copyright was NOT intended to allow companies to leverage their copyright capital to create artistic monopolies, which is essentially what we have now. Sure, you can create some indie movie - but no one will ever see it, because the market is controlled on all ends by the media cartels; and if you ever did become successful, I find it likely that you would be sued by the cartels for similarities to their copyrights (which is nearly impossible to avoid).

      Piracy is nothing more than freeloading.

      On a small scale, yes. On a massive scale, no. Piracy is restoring the balance that was destroyed by Disney and friends years ago. It is a counter to something which was brushed under the carpet for this long. People are just now realizing what is wrong with copyright, en masse, because of the internet and thus piracy. It is becoming clear to most people that artificial monopolies and intangible value are hurting society. Because of this, the media companies are fighting back; attempting to control the internet, pass more draconian copyright laws, etc. And they are winning, thanks to apathy and people like you.

      Software developers, musicians, filmmakers, authors, and so on--"Fuck their rights!"

      Exactly - fuck their "rights"! They do not have the right to do what they have been doing, and only have it because they have spent millions to mislead the public into thinking they do.

      If some artists must starve, which is just about as likely as Iraq having attacked us with WMDs, for society to function, than so be it. The artists and cartels have shown they do not, as a group, care about those starving in third world countries. Some may speak out, but only for publicity: if any one them truly cared, they would live a middle-upper class life and give their profits to the real poor, so why should anyone care about them starving? In my opinion, the world has bigger problems than that, and the lives that copyright has destroyed far outweigh a few broke artists.

      Change is coming, like it or not, and your fictional right to control every word you write will end. I will not shed a tear.

    2. Re:Nothing more than glorification by servies · · Score: 1

      Yet now we have the communistic handwringers who believe that copyright is a god-given right to have a stranglehold on your creations, of any kind, and profit from it no matter what.

      I must say that that sounds more like capitalist behaviour than communist behaviour...

    3. Re:Nothing more than glorification by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      The granting of the control is not. It is effectively an artificial monopoly given out by the government to reproduce a certain work. Which is not really capitalistic; it just happens to be in the interests of the ruling class.

    4. Re:Nothing more than glorification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh oh, looks like someone's been skipping their meds again.

    5. Re:Nothing more than glorification by Candid88 · · Score: 1

      These media companies force me to listen to the shameful excuses for music which are R&B and Hip-Hop all day on radio stations.

      You might say it's the radio stations' fault but everyone knows they are brainless idiots who just play whatever tapes they are sent by the big 4 record companies. So sorry, but I have no pity for them. On the rare occasion they release and promote decent rock and dance music I pay for it even if I do also download it off of TPB.

  35. Re:missing semicolon by vertigoCiel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Keming n. 1. The result of improper kerning.

  36. I may be completely off base on this one... by untree · · Score: 1

    ...but I'm guessing you probably meant to link to the President's website rather than a mildly humorous farcical spinoff. I mean, sure, you're a mindless troll, but even trolls should "Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!"

  37. Re:First? by zobier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No no, if it were an ad for a tech job the requirements would be more like:

        must be 20-something and have 30 years sexual experience.

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  38. You two agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but are ignoring that you're agreeing over two separate things.

    He doesn't bother with the unjustness of copyright and you think it central.

    But you both believe that this will cause a general disobedience of all laws, because some are so manifestly wrong.

  39. Re:First? by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

    Hey just talk a good game, and figure it out as you go like the rest of us! Doesn't RMS have a how-to out? Should be a ok starting point... I think

    --
    oogly boogly!
  40. Pirates didn't really eat babies, you know... by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 1

    But ninjas would and they'd blame it on pirates.

    Pirates>ninjas

  41. Re:Oh really? How much have you paid them recently by Raenex · · Score: 1

    If its just a matter of selling ad banners, then I can see them perhaps doing as they say; breaking even.

    TPB is very large and well into the profit making range for an advertising based web site.

    It also sounds like they're paying tax on their income.

    Where do you get this from? I have seen stories that the money goes offshore and is not taxed. Why don't you ask the site operators just what their expenses and revenue are? Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.

  42. Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    TPB is very large and well into the profit making range for an advertising based web site.

    Fair enough. --After looking more closely, I must admit that I am amazed by the kind of figures bandied about by advertising companies!

    I'd also read through this with some interest. But without official figures, believing the assertions of TPB guys themselves as opposed to the media, it's hard to figure out who is telling the truth.

    I guess it will all come out in the wash. I'll be waiting, like everybody else, with bated breath to find out what the real story is.

    For my part, I wouldn't be heart-broken in the slightest to see Hollywood, the Networks and Big Music come crashing down in a spectacular fireball of snowstorming TV sets as a result of TPB, and television and computer screens go blank from lack of funding. I despise 99% of the brain-rotting garbage produced as news and entertainment today, and consider it to be largely responsible for the mess the human race is currently in. And it is for this exact reason that I really don't think there is any danger of the flow of televised brain-rot ever diminishing. It is simply far too valuable an asset to the elite. Opiate of the masses, and all that. --Keeping the masses well-drugged is a vital ingredient in successful global control, so it hardly matters how the brain-rot is distributed. I take that to be a self-evident truth, and as such, all this nonsense about copyright and intellectual property theft is a giant, stupid laugh. A total, nonsense distraction at best, and at worst, yet another excuse to ratchet up the level of oppressive population control.

    I can see two basic likely outcomes; 1. Successful oppressive control over the internet. Or 2., TPB model evolve into a sort of profit-sharing system emerge for the most-often downloaded items. It'd be nice to see the middlemen bypassed and money actually accrue to the artists. With TPB, that might just have a sliver of a chance of happening, but it's not terribly likely. Greed tends to dominate.

    -FL

    1. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I despise 99% of the brain-rotting garbage produced as news and entertainment today, and consider it to be largely responsible for the mess the human race is currently in.

      Humanity has always been in a mess. I don't think getting rid of Hollywood will lead to Utopia.

      Keeping the masses well-drugged is a vital ingredient in successful global control, so it hardly matters how the brain-rot is distributed.

      Government is probably more worried about keeping people employed than "drugging" the masses. Besides that, on a personal level there are plenty of quality music, movies, and shows that I would miss without an industry supported by copyright. It's not up to you to decide what people find entertaining.

    2. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Humanity has always been in a mess. I don't think getting rid of Hollywood will lead to Utopia.

      Not Utopia, but certainly fewer glassy eyes. Video games must go as well.

      Government is probably more worried about keeping people employed than "drugging" the masses.

      You might have been watching too much TV.

      Besides that, on a personal level there are plenty of quality music, movies, and shows that I would miss without an industry supported by copyright.

      You have definitely been watching too much TV.

      It's not up to you to decide what people find entertaining.

      Of course it is and I call it crap. You can call it gold if you want to, and that's YOUR decision which is yours only to make. But then you also think the government is more interested in creating jobs than in keeping people under thumb, and I didn't say government, did I? I said 'Elite'. Big difference.

      -FL

    3. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Not Utopia, but certainly fewer glassy eyes. Video games must go as well.

      Yeah, how dare people seek out entertainment. Imagine all those stupid people throughout the history of humanity telling stories and playing games. They should spend all their leisure time doing some kind of meaningful work, like listening to Fantastic Lad on Slashdot.

      You have definitely been watching too much TV.

      Or you haven't watched any or looked hard enough, or maybe you just have a stick up your ass. I don't like >90% of movies or television, but there's always a few things to pick out from the pile. Then again, there's only a few shows that I watch, and I only watch a movie now and then. Nobody says you have to spend all your time in front of the TV.

      But then you also think the government is more interested in creating jobs than in keeping people under thumb, and I didn't say government, did I? I said 'Elite'. Big difference.

      Right, how dare there be a class of people that gain more than others. I worked for this real elitist bastard, totally rich. Oh sure, he started his own company and used his intelligence, vision, and dedication to make it work, and sold it for millions and then started another company. But what an elitist bastard!

    4. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Right, how dare there be a class of people that gain more than others. I worked for this real elitist bastard, totally rich. Oh sure, he started his own company and used his intelligence, vision, and dedication to make it work, and sold it for millions and then started another company. But what an elitist bastard!

      He's not even close to 'elite'. He's what we call an, 'iddy-biddy puffing floor manager'. Just to get the definitions nailed down, the 'Elite' create and own the money supply and thus the world. They also own the extensive underground bunkers, (otherwise known as 'cities'). While you and I are enjoying the 1% of not-lame media, (and yes, I love a good story, but seriously. . 10%? In book form maybe. . , and maybe from years ago, but in theaters and on television and in newspapers today? Saying that 1% is worth anything other than mis-directing, bullshit crappola is being exceedingly generous. But that's my opinion. Like I said, what you see as gold is gold, so do enjoy.), but while you and I are running around looking for the next bit of nonsense, the big stuff unfolding today is far more intriguing and sensitive to the actions of aware people. --Seriously, none of the stuff which has been happening since about 1995 is a surprise. Want to know what happens next? I'll tell you! --A bit more sideways zig-zig shuffle toward the finish line, and then down, down, down --with a surprise rain of rocks from space. . , among other goodies. But I'll be damned if those bastards aren't actually going to use all that barbed wire. Fifteen years ago I didn't buy it. I said, "No way! People simply aren't there. Mass-hatred and mass-destruction of all Semitic blood-lines? (That's Jew and non-Jew in case I'm over-assuming a commonality in definitions here.) Sorry. I just don't see it. The public is just too. . , balanced and happy. Everybody watches Star Trek, for goodness sake! I know TV is bullshit, but Picard has got to count for something!"

      Of course, I couldn't pin down the details, but the direction and intent is always the same. --Though it's only just now entering a phase of uncertainty, which is the part I find really exciting! I know the bad guys fail in their bid for the planet, but I'm not sure if it happens on this side of the reality curtain or the next or what form failure will take. One thing I do know; it's not going to happen without a lot of death and dancing around, so the only thing which counts in the end is awareness and intent. And if any of that makes sense to you, then perhaps I'm wrong about the whole TV thing, but I'm betting most would blink at me and say, "wahthefuh?" --TV and all the related control mechanisms are a much bigger problem than people realize. So no fence-sitting. Make your choices now. Fence sitters are perhaps the worst-screwed, cuz the whole point of being here is to choose to be selfish or to not, which actually links right back to the whole copyright question and the peculiarity which is TPB. Avoiding the question means you haven't made it, and that means you get to spin the wheel and go through this whole yarn yet again.

      -FL

    5. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me that you take a bunch of random conspiracy theories as true. I'm not sure what TV has to do with it -- you can watch TV and believe in conspiracy theories at the same time.

    6. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me that you take a bunch of random conspiracy theories as true. I'm not sure what TV has to do with it -- you can watch TV and believe in conspiracy theories at the same time.

      TV directs you to respect arbitrary boundaries of reality. "Conspiracy theory" is only a dirty term to those who are so managed. "Conspiracy theory" is a term constantly re-invented and propagated, and most importantly, given negative emotional connotation by the media. Your own observations are colored by this. That is what TV has to do with it.

      Look and you will see. The crime isn't that people are instructed not to look; free choice in this regard cannot be abridged. The crime is that from birth, people are given a false map of reality and are instructed that to look beyond its edges is foolery. The only cure is to look, but the common man has been henpecked through various means to fear their own powers of observation. Pathetic. Sinister.

      The Media is one of the three voices compelling this restricted behavior. Consider; I would guess that you would hold conspiracy theory and religion to be closely related phenomena, yet conspiracy theory is marginalized while religion is widespread. Both exist within the realm of media, and yet only one serves the elite and thus thrives and shapes the world. The false map describes arbitrary boundaries, but the means of presenting the map is anything but arbitrary. Clever, no?

      -FL

    7. Re:Opiate of the Masses delivered at no cost! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      "Conspiracy theory" is a term constantly re-invented and propagated, and most importantly, given negative emotional connotation by the media.

      Yeah, I know, men in boardrooms sit around and say "today let's direct media to give conspiracy theory a negative connotation". Not that there aren't, at any time, any number of conspiracy theories floating around, many of which give themselves bad names. There are also conspiracy theories popularized by the media and believed by the public.

      So the real question is what do you believe and why? There are tons of conspiracy theories to choose from. If you believe in a Illuminati-type conspiracy, complete with the idea that big media prevents people from seeing it, then show the evidence that everybody is missing because they are watching too much TV. I mean it must be blindingly obvious if it's just a matter of too much TV.

      I would guess that you would hold conspiracy theory and religion to be closely related phenomena, yet conspiracy theory is marginalized while religion is widespread.

      That's because religion offers answers to the "meaning of life".

  43. The Jury Box Dilemma by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know, men in boardrooms sit around and say "today let's direct media to give conspiracy theory a negative connotation".

    Sure. Why not? All manner of advertising and political agendas are effectively served through deliberate efforts to sculpt public perception. It would be silly to assume that other subject matter is not similarly managed, especially when it can so dramatically affect the course of human endeavor. COINTELPRO has a long and sordid history as is evidenced by the mountains of documentation retrieved by diligent researchers through the FOIA. Just the stuff we know about is quite startling.

    It should also be remembered that television is a medium exceptionally designed for the purpose of managing public perception. EEG measurements demonstrate that the light strobe effects of the humble CRT knock the brain of the viewer into a trance state whereby audio and visual messages can be planted very deeply into the subconscious. It is for this reason that it is often so hard to remember what was viewed only a minute previously during a commercial break. This is no secret, but it is rarely discussed. With the advent of flat-screen technology, which has a different effect upon the brain that in tandem we have witnessed the rise of wireless microwave technologies which have a somewhat similar deleterious effect upon awareness. Most people in the West spend a great deal of time with their brains quite fuzzed. This is not accidental.

    Not that there aren't, at any time, any number of conspiracy theories floating around, many of which give themselves bad names. There are also conspiracy theories popularized by the media and believed by the public.

    The idea of media is basically a good one; a means for broad communication, and there are indeed attempts at positive messages designed to spread knowledge. But the medium itself is largely corrupted. As Mcluhan was insistent upon repeating, "The medium is the message." -- But few heed that message, or indeed understand its implications. The internet is so cool precisely because it is different, with much power being given to the viewer. As such, the systems for controlling perception are by necessity different. I have found that in many areas which count, there is a great deal of garbage, false signal injected which serves to muddy the waters. I would say that the efforts have been rather effective, judging by the general public response to alternative news and ways of thinking. Knee-jerk negative emotional reactions to whole areas of research are not uncommon. Several of the higher profile sources on the internet have, upon investigation, been found to have links to some rather shady beginnings. It's a fascinating world to plumb, but few have the capacity to do so. Automatic negative emotional reactions to otherwise benign ideas are, I think, a powerful indicator of deliberate perception sculpting.

    If you believe in a Illuminati-type conspiracy, complete with the idea that big media prevents people from seeing it, then show the evidence that everybody is missing because they are watching too much TV. I mean it must be blindingly obvious if it's just a matter of too much TV.

    This is one of the more brilliant con-jobs. The 'burden of proof' dilemma.

    There is a reason there have been SO many court room dramas featured on television over the years, instilling in people a rigid set of rules for the acceptable manner through which knowledge may be collected and conveyed. The school system has similarly worked to hammer home these rules, through reductionist science, which while valid in certain ways, are woefully insufficient in certain other areas.

    Example. . .

    If I were to report that I had just witnessed something amazing in the backyard, a child would say, "Really? I want to see too!" and they would run to look. An adult, however, whose mind has been effectively programmed through years of non-stop conditioning, is far more likely to respond with questions and demands f

    1. Re:The Jury Box Dilemma by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Most people in the West spend a great deal of time with their brains quite fuzzed. This is not accidental.

      Yet millions of people every day manage to carry on complex tasks that require intelligent thinking. Do you wear a tinfoil hat to keep the waves out?

      I have found that in many areas which count, there is a great deal of garbage, false signal injected which serves to muddy the waters.

      How do I know that you aren't a false signal? You're of the type that give conspiracy theories a bad name.

      There is a reason there have been SO many court room dramas featured on television over the years, instilling in people a rigid set of rules for the acceptable manner through which knowledge may be collected and conveyed.

      If your life hung in the balance, then yes, you'd like that rigid set of rules. Television dramatizes court because it sells. It sells because courts are part of people's lives. No grand conspiracy needed.

      One cannot even prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the sky is blue without the aid and application of direct experience. But adults feel secure and right in saying, "No. I will not go to see your amazing thing in the backyard. I will sit here in my easy chair, (the jury box), and you must provide me with proof, even extraordinary proof, of your claims before I will deign to accept what you say as true."

      That's life. If it were as simple as running out to the backyard, people would do it. If you want to send people out on a wild good chase involving a lot of travel and time, then people will be skeptical, as well they should be. People make up shit all the time, either intentionally or just through naiveté and perception bias. You could spend your whole life investigating bullshit.

      "Your level of awareness is YOUR problem. Not anybody else's. If you reject an idea, or 'win' a court case against the acceptance of an idea, then who has truly lost? The one who has the direct experience personally loses nothing by the successfully defended ignorance of another."

      If you're trying to get some message out to cause an action (which may ultimately benefit you), then it also becomes YOUR problem if the message isn't accepted.

      And this system of thought control is largely implanted through the broad application of television on a population. It is, as I have said, ingenious, if dark in intention.

      Or, alternatively, there is no grand conspiracy that orchestrates are lives in some sinister symphony. Do you really think when television was invented it was by "Elitists" to control the masses, using a strobe effect? Do you really think wireless cell phones were invented to replace television for mind control?

      You've gotten so deep into your conspiracy that you fit everything into it, instead of taking much simpler explanations.

      There are conspiracies, propaganda, and the like, that go on all the time. It's just that many times there aren't conspiracies involved.

    2. Re:The Jury Box Dilemma by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Yet millions of people every day manage to carry on complex tasks that require intelligent thinking. Do you wear a tinfoil hat to keep the waves out?

      No, I just stay away from garbage interference, toxins and similar. If tin foil worked, I'd probably use that as well because I'm not threatened by the opinions of others. Intelligent thinking is absolutely affected, but one of the more important things affected is one's ability to sense energy and emotions in others. Perceptive dimensions which most are blind to.

      How do I know that you aren't a false signal?

      You'd have to take the time to collect numerous streams of information and cross reference to see what cancels out. You're smart; do the work. Another, faster method is to listen to your instincts; the voice of your higher self which knows what's what, and which is in contact right now with my higher self. You have to know how to cut through the static to do that, however, and that takes practice.

      You're of the type that give conspiracy theories a bad name.

      You don't know that as per your first question, so that's just confusion and fear talking. How you fix that is your problem.

      If your life hung in the balance, then yes, you'd like that rigid set of rules. Television dramatizes court because it sells. It sells because courts are part of people's lives. No grand conspiracy needed

      It wouldn't be an effective ploy if it weren't paired with a plausible 'simple solution' to keep the muggles feeling comfortable. The problem is that the end result remains true. Judge the tree by the fruit it bears.

      That's life. If it were as simple as running out to the backyard, people would do it. If you want to send people out on a wild good chase involving a lot of travel and time, then people will be skeptical, as well they should be. People make up shit all the time, either intentionally or just through naiveté and perception bias. You could spend your whole life investigating bullshit.

      Bullshit. "I don't have time to read/learn/experience." Excuses. What could be more important than exploring and understanding the nature of the reality you live in? Make time. It's not that hard. Keep in mind that these systems of social control come with a variety of conveniently available built-in excuses for people to use in order to protect the system.

      If you're trying to get some message out to cause an action (which may ultimately benefit you), then it also becomes YOUR problem if the message isn't accepted.

      Ha ha. Oh, poor you. Let me soften things; --Because, actually, I do lose in a sense; in that we are all one, that every piece which goes dark is a loss to the whole. But at this layer of reality we exist as separate beings, so at the moment, my only responsibility is to be the best version of myself; to care for my own soul and any which ask for help. Your responsibility is to grow and take care of your soul. If you want to disintegrate, that's your choice and that's how it has to be and I simply can't be bothered to waste energy on cowards and lost causes. I'm not obligated to do your work for you. In fact, it would be a violation.

      Or, alternatively, there is no grand conspiracy that orchestrates are lives in some sinister symphony. Do you really think when television was invented it was by "Elitists" to control the masses, using a strobe effect? Do you really think wireless cell phones were invented to replace television for mind control?

      Sorry. All the evidence I have explored, (in many different forms), doesn't point to a benign state of affairs. Not at all! --And yes, I do absolutely believe that television was invented for the reasons stated, as were the currents running through our power distribution system chosen. --There is a great deal of knowledge out there which is not contested, but simply buried. I have accessed information you have clearly not sought out, and so you are speculating with extremely limited reso

    3. Re:The Jury Box Dilemma by Raenex · · Score: 1

      "I don't have time to read/learn/experience." Excuses. What could be more important than exploring and understanding the nature of the reality you live in? Make time. It's not that hard.

      I have a finite amount of time to go on these kinds of investigations -- and that would be the case under any political system. There are more things to investigate than there is time for. I have already spent enough time looking at religions and political whatnots, so I don't go off on random goose chases.

    4. Re:The Jury Box Dilemma by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      I have a finite amount of time to go on these kinds of investigations -- and that would be the case under any political system. There are more things to investigate than there is time for. I have already spent enough time looking at religions and political whatnots, so I don't go off on random goose chases.

      I was going to leave it here, but two thoughts occurred to me. . .

      1. I am the kind of person who finds exploration into such areas fun, and so I do it. I think 'fun' determines much how we spend our finite energies, but in becoming fun, I did wrestle with the following question. . .

      2. Being finite, it only makes sense that one should spend one's energies in efforts toward ends which are not based on false premises. One must learn the real game rules before attempting to succeed in life. Running toward the wrong goal posts makes no sense to me. That being said, one's individual mission profile is best achieved by following one's bliss, so to speak. Trust in 'fun'. Not all of us are here to plumb the depths of reality. Some of us are here simply to work on social skills, or various modes of expression, etc. Every soul has a different goal in a given life time, and in some cases, ignorance of certain details is a requirement for full engagement on a given path. Our higher selves, I have found, try in earnest to trick us into certain courses of experience which we might otherwise avoid if full knowledge were available of what we were setting out towards. Some of the most valuable lessons which lead to significant soul growth are by necessity both difficult and painful. Truth can hurt.

      Cheers and good luck on your chosen path!

      -FL