Slashdot Mirror


Dispelling Myths About Geomagnetic Reversal

UniverseToday has an interesting look at geomagnetic reversal, the process in which the Earth's magnetic poles trade places. The article cites known trends and recent studies to debunk doomsday myths and unsubstantiated claims about the process. One such study is attempting to model the earth's core with a 26-ton ball of molten metal. Another recently found evidence that the Earth has a second, weaker magnetic field. "We do know that this magnetic pole flip-flop has occurred many times in the last few million years; the last occurred 780,000 years ago according to ferromagnetic sediment. A few scaremongering articles have said geomagnetic reversal occurs with 'clockwork regularity' — this is simply not true."

158 comments

  1. it switched last week... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and the bankers flipped.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:it switched last week... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      LOL! where is the "funny" to this guy?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:it switched last week... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Is not funny for you :)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    3. Re:it switched last week... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Uhh... Why "flamebait"? Someone here do not have sense of humor

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    4. Re:it switched last week... by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      There's much disinformation below, so I'm posting way up here to save you time. First, magnetic poll reversal is a chaotic process. It's simply not predictable, and these 2012 guys are buffoons. Second, poll reversal will not cause electronics to blow up due to a rapid change in magnetic fields - the change will be far too slow and weak in strength. It takes a thousand years or more for a pole reversal. However, during that time will likely be a short period of little or no magnetic field, and we will be showered with far higher radiation from the Sun, causing us to design radiation tolerant electronics and likely increasing cancer rates. Given all the other way's humanity is currently trying to kill itself, magnetic pole reversal shouldn't even be on our radar.

      However, it's still a fun topic for discussion. There's a spot in the Atlantic called the South Atlantic Anomaly, with is viewed by many to be a new North Pole trying to form. If it breaks through, we're in for a few very interesting thousand years or so.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    5. Re:it switched last week... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If it [South Atlantic Anomaly,] breaks through, we're in for a few very interesting thousand years or so.

      You might be in for an interesting few thousand years (or so), but the way my knees are going (in my 40s ; too much cave crawling), I'm not sure I'd find anything very interesting for more than another century or so.

      BTW, what's your trick for maintaining thousands of years of interest in the outside world? Extreme calorie restriction, or being disembowelled according to the Book of the Dead, dried, and stored in alabaster jars? (That's a joke by the way - when did the Egyptians ever put windows to the outside world into their tombs?)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Not really worried. by Sj0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The only reason I'd really be worried about the magnetic field flipping is that a changing magnetic field induces a current in a conductor. This means every electronic and electrical device with a closed loop would experience a large current, likely destroying the smaller equipment.

    The magnitude is questionable, though. It all depends on how quickly the magnetic field changes, what the field strength of the earth is, and the design of electrical devices affected.

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:Not really worried. by volsung · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, such changes in the magnetic field might happen "quickly" on geologic timescales, but would be very slow on human timescales. Such a flip won't be like an EMP going off.

    2. Re:Not really worried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't rotating the device 180 degrees have the same effect? If it takes you 0.5 sec to turn a North-facing iPod into a South-facing iPod and it doesn't break it, just how fast a geomagnetic reversal do you have in mind?

    3. Re:Not really worried. by jcorno · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only reason I'd really be worried about the magnetic field flipping is that a changing magnetic field induces a current in a conductor. This means every electronic and electrical device with a closed loop would experience a large current, likely destroying the smaller equipment.

      The earth's magnetic field is about half a gauss at the surface. It's weaker than the field generated by a refrigerator magnet. I think it's safe to say that the flip is not gonna destroy your electronics.

    4. Re:Not really worried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      A more comprehensive chart at a variety of scales (zoomed in on the last ~1Ma (million years) the last 5Ma and over the last 160Ma is available on the relevant wikipedia page about geomagnetic reversals. The fluctuations are anything but "regular". Anyone who describes them that way doesn't know what they are talking about. Sure, like anything, you can calculate a mean duration, but the variance is very high, with durations from 10s of millions of years to 50000 years. "Clocklike regularity"? Sure, if your clock ticks 1 second one time, and 5 minutes the next.

      If these were bad events, there would be obvious correlation to major extinction events. There simply isn't, and people have looked really hard (because it would be interesting if there was).

    5. Re:Not really worried. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, why is this a cataclysm?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:Not really worried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make a parallel: The Sun might be as bright as a 100W bulb held 3 cm away, but that doesn't mean that turning off the Sun would not be a cataclysm.

    7. Re:Not really worried. by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      The only reason I'd really be worried about the magnetic field flipping is that a changing magnetic field induces a current in a conductor.

      Really? And the fact that the Earth's magnetic field keeps us protected from extremely harmful cosmic radiation doesn't even register with you?

      I am not saying the switch would cause a disruption of this field, but I guess that could happen. And if did happen, depending on how long it would last, it could have catastrophic consequences. It may not wipe out life as we know it, but something major would happen, something less than pleasant.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    8. Re:Not really worried. by Maset · · Score: 1

      take your CRT from the southern to northen hemisphere.

    9. Re:Not really worried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's the damn point: it isn't a cataclysm. It's been turned into one by a bunch of pseudoscientists to sell alarmist books and idiotic, overdramatized programs to the Discovery Channel. At most it might give us some spectacular aurora at low latitudes, increase cosmic rays at the surface by a measurable but biologically insignificant amount, mess up compasses and maybe a few satellites, and cause some geese and pigeons to fly in the wrong direction for a while.

      The only true cataclysm here is that people can make a decent living selling this kind of crap, but I suppose that's nothing new. In the 1910s some people thought Halley's comet was going to poison the Earth because deadly gases were found spectroscopically in its tail, and the Earth was going to pass through it. Imaginative business people sold gas masks and "anti-comet pills". Same idea, only this time it's "geomagnetic reversals".

    10. Re:Not really worried. by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 0

      Ask a climatologist what the largest influence on earth's climate is, and his answer will be "the earth's magnetosphere." It deflects the solar wind greatly; without this effect, the earth would be as arid as the moon, which has no magnetosphere.

      Climate models used to predict CO emissions' effects on climate assume a constant magnetosphere. Here's what Wikipedia says about it:

      Climate models use quantitative methods to simulate the interactions of the atmosphere,[43] oceans, land surface and ice. They are used for a variety of purposes from study of the dynamics of the weather and climate system to projections of future climate. All climate models balance, or very nearly balance, incoming energy as short wave (including visible) electromagnetic radiation to the earth with outgoing energy as long wave (infrared) electromagnetic radiation from the earth. Any imbalance results in a change in the average temperature of the earth.

      That the earth's magenetic field is decreasing might be one more reason the climate is warming dramatically.

    11. Re:Not really worried. by sir+fer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What bullshit. The largest influence on the Earths climate is the Sun! You know? that bright thing in the sky that makes it warmer during the day. I don't know what sort of climatologists you speak to but they are idiots if they say the Earths magnetic field is the largest influence on the climate. It prevents the solar wind being a significant influence so it prevents many other influences but it is NOT an influence in and of itself. Incident EM radiation and the Earths magnetic field are 2 distinct and unrelated phenomena. FYI I am a physicist and your post is almost complete nonsense.

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    12. Re:Not really worried. by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      Ask a climatologist what the largest influence on earth's climate is, and his answer will be "the earth's magnetosphere." It deflects the solar wind greatly; without this effect, the earth would be as arid as the moon, which has no magnetosphere.

      This is bullshit.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    13. Re:Not really worried. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      There would be an increase in radiation reaching the planets surface, so staying indoors a little more often during the switch over would be recommended. Also any solar flares that happened to discharge material towards the earth would cause a bit more damage, overall all nothing to dramatic.

      The only real problem, the smallest critters, bacteria, algae, viruses and, fungi, the additional radiation load would likely trigger some disruptive mutations, which could be rather troublesome. Other than that, the only real problem would be navigation and, a whole bunch of Australians, pointing out 'whose bloody down under now' and, everybody would have to get new maps http://freakymartin.com/2007/12/25/map-of-the-world-from-australia-3-photos/.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:Not really worried. by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      If these were bad events, there would be obvious correlation to major extinction events. There simply isn't, and people have looked really hard (because it would be interesting if there was).

      That is not exactly correct, because what is being posited is technological impact. 780k years ago there weren't any artificial electromagnetic fields around to be disrupted.

      That is not to say that I am convinced there would be large impacts on devices which rely on electromagnetism, as the switch would be slow enough and diffuse enough that they would probably fall below most devices' noise thresholds. However, anything that did affect such devices would have major consequences these days, purely because we are reliant on our EM-based technology working. I think we can safely rule out birds falling out of the sky, but some effect on EM-devices is more probable.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    15. Re:Not really worried. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      please tell me, where can I buy these North-facing and South-facing iPods? I didn't hear anything about it on Job's Keynote? Are they on preorder yet? Do they come in different colors?

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    16. Re:Not really worried. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      There's a massive difference in the amount of cosmic radiation that reaches places like Australia as compared with the UK. I believe that in Australia they stave off massive continent wide catastrophe by wearing hats in the sun.

    17. Re:Not really worried. by swamp_ig · · Score: 1

      There's an element of truth, although it's not the major influence.

      A lower magnetic field *may* result in greater penetration of the solar wind into the lower atmosphere. This heats it from above, although this is unlikley to cause heating lower down since it's convectivly stable (hot air rises, so the heat isn't transfered to the troposphere where we live).

      The major long term effect would be an increase in the rate at which the solar wind 'blows away' the atmosphere. Some scientists speculate that Mars has lost almost all of its atmosphere due to this process, but we're talking geological time here.

    18. Re:Not really worried. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's an after-sale modification. You can do it yourself, but it may void the warranty.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:Not really worried. by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting theory. I wonder what the rates of flux are of the atmosphere with and without the magnetic field in a planet the size of Earth or Mars. How long would it take for just this effect to leech out a significant portion of the atmosphere?

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    20. Re:Not really worried. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't rotating the device 180 degrees have the same effect? If it takes you 0.5 sec to turn a North-facing iPod into a South-facing iPod and it doesn't break it, just how fast a geomagnetic reversal do you have in mind?

      HEY SHUT THE F UP!!

      You're ruining a perfectly decent bit of paranoia with all of your logic & fact!!!

    21. Re:Not really worried. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Ah, of course! Then the more important question: Would a new firmware brick my north/south faced iPod? Would I still be able to synchronize with iTunes? Will it maybe be a standard feature on the new iPods? Oh my, so many choices. Maybe I better wait until the next Keynote

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  3. Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wanna see it flip and take it all with it.

    Lets return to the earth, have half of us killed, and go back to hunting venison like we very well used to before some assholes started to chat about this "civilization" crap we are in right now.

    Fuck that.

    Back to the trees people, this stupid "modern society" thing didnt work.

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Lets see it... by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Funny

      Says the guy posting to Slashdot.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:Lets see it... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
      Lets return to the earth, have half of us killed, and go back to hunting venison like we very well used to before some assholes started to chat about this "civilization" crap we are in right now.

      If we tried to live as hunter-gatherers, we'd need to kill off a whole lot more than half of us. World population is now something like 6.6 billion. We didn't reach 3 billion until 1961. In 4000 BC, about the time civilisation was really getting going in Egypt and Mesopotamia, the population of the world was more like 20 million. That's the kind of figure you're looking at for a world of hunter-gatherers. About the same as the population of New York city.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Lets see it... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Lets return to the earth, have half of us killed, and go back to hunting venison like we very well used to before some assholes started to chat about this "civilization" crap we are in right now.

      No need to wait for the flip ... move to Alaska, now.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Lets see it... by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if we went through a phase of hunting people instead of venison for food, the plan just might work. Then not only do you get a reduced population due to food harvesting, but you also get a reduced population due to wide spread disease. Whoo Hoo! All our problems are solved!

    5. Re:Lets see it... by harry666t · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's great that you'd be glad to see three billions of people dead. You know, it's people like you that make me feel sorry for the mankind.

      Have you ever heard about "you can solve everything through love" philosophy? I swear to you, it works much better in practice than a holocaust.

      If you hate that civilization so much, why don't you just move into a fuckin' cave?

      Learn to swim, or drown.

    6. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or wait until Alaska move to Washington.

    7. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just upset that your digital watch broke.

    8. Re:Lets see it... by owlnation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Relax, it would make an awesome reality tv gameshow. The Ultimate Survivor! 6 billion people and half must go!

      And face it, losing would still be less painful than actually watching reality tv.

    9. Re:Lets see it... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Have you ever heard about "you can solve everything through love" philosophy?

      Yeah, I heard something like that.

      There's nothing you can do that can't be done, nothing you can sing that can't be sung, nothing you can say but you can learn how to play the game; it's easy. There's nothing you can make that can't be made, no-one you can save that can't be saved, nothing you can do but you can learn how to be you in time; it's easy. There's nothing you can know that isn't known, nothing you can see that isn't shown, nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be; it's easy.

      I'm not sure how practical that is as advice. As an example of the rhetorical concept of tautology, sure...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 1


      Have you ever heard about "you can solve everything through love" philosophy?

      I have.

      I call it a lie.

      --
      NO SIG
    11. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      And, by the way, its people like you that make me feel grateful for Sarah Palin.

      And i dont hate civilization. Im just pointing out that it doesnt work as it should. And it doesnt.

      --
      NO SIG
    12. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Well think about that: in that world, no need to rescue wallstreet so that they can come back and fuck everyone in the world (yes, not just everyone in america but everyone IN THE WORLD) again.

      --
      NO SIG
    13. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bow in signal of respect.

      --
      NO SIG
    14. Re:Lets see it... by harry666t · · Score: 1

      > Im just pointing out that it doesnt work as it should.

      Then why let it take away the control over your happiness?

      I know c11n doesn't work. It can't bring you anything but what you would have otherwise; neither will it bring you happiness nor stop you from being happy. It's your own choice to be happy or not, and your own choice to let someone else choose for you.

    15. Re:Lets see it... by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Except for the problems of the victims, whose problems escalate rapidly before becoming completely irrelevant - they don't get solved!

    16. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if we went through a phase of hunting people instead of venison for food, the plan just might work. Then not only do you get a reduced population due to food harvesting, but you also get a reduced population due to wide spread disease. Whoo Hoo! All our problems are solved!

      I'm guessing the basement dwelling nerd-monkey posting this to Slashdot is destined for the food category anyway so let's do it...I'll solve all your problems for you.

    17. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Thats why i advocate masturbation.

      --
      NO SIG
    18. Re:Lets see it... by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's evidence that cannibalism leads to prion diseases (like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease) ). So have a nice meal!

    19. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're assuming that you'll be one of the people who lives?

    20. Re:Lets see it... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      > I swear to you, it works much better in practice than a holocaust.

      Well if you only gave holocaust a chance...

    21. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I remember when we came down from the trees. The girls *still* wanted to be "just friends"...

    22. Re:Lets see it... by ps2os2 · · Score: 1

      Would you really want the republicans standing around telling everyone that you are lazy people and they are the "gods" of earth?

    23. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the trees, they were a mistake too - in fact, even having cells get together and collaborate wasn't that good an idea, and don't get me started on the big bang.

      [with respect to Douglas Adams]

    24. Re:Lets see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realise that a magnetic reversal takes a couple thousand years just to "flip", so the theory of us all dying by november........not so likely

    25. Re:Lets see it... by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 1

      In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

    26. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Finally... someone got it.

      Jeeze.

      --
      NO SIG
    27. Re:Lets see it... by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 1

      People are always asking me if I know Alex Borges.

    28. Re:Lets see it... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      They do that a lot.

      I know.

      --
      NO SIG
  4. Get ready for it! by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Funny

    "we'll be exposed to the vast quantities of radiation blasting from the Sun; with a reversing magnetic field comes a weakening in the Earth's ability to deflect cosmic rays."

    Finally, a use for our tinfoil hats!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Get ready for it! by chibiace · · Score: 0

      and with the solar wind at an all time low, we're toast.

      --
      he who controls the spice controls the universe
  5. Unknown by Mortiss · · Score: 3, Informative

    AFAIK the process takes a very long time and would be very gradual and although it may begin soon it would take a long time and allow for everything to adjust, if required.
    However, one can never be really sure... any data on effects of previous switches?

    1. Re:Unknown by perlchild · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering we have to look for evidence of the previous switches in three-quarter-of-a-million year old sediment, any data we have on effects is going to be open to interpretation. It's not like we had reporters back then.

    2. Re:Unknown by owlnation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering we have to look for evidence of the previous switches in three-quarter-of-a-million year old sediment, any data we have on effects is going to be open to interpretation. It's not like we had reporters back then.

      Can we not just ask someone in the RIAA? After all, their business model was developed around then.

    3. Re:Unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is going to be open to interpretation, but there's *loads* of evidence in the sediments that confirm it wasn't the end of the world. Heck, there wasn't even a significant extinction at that time. Life goes across the interval as if nothing happened. If there was a huge, world-shaking cataclysm associated, it would stick out. There are plenty of other examples of such events in Earth history (e.g., the Cretaceous/Tertiary bounday), so we can be confident that the record is good enough to detect the really bad events, and many smaller ones. Geomagnetic reversals are no big deal.

    4. Re:Unknown by harry666t · · Score: 1

      > any data on effects of previous switches?

      Lost, due to a hard drive failure, 780,000 years ago.

    5. Re:Unknown by harry666t · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering. Will it have any impact on the way we feel and behave? Humans (and many other animals) are able to sense local changes in the planet's magnetic field. Many species of birds use their "magnetic sense" to find way to the south when migrating.

      The burst of solar wind, cosmic rays and all that crap might have no greater effect on the living beings themselves, but how about all our delicate electronic stuff that we are used to depend on?

    6. Re:Unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is, "Not much." I've heard of studies with homing pigeons where they attached powerful magnets to them and while it did screw up their sense of direction for getting home, they did learn to compensate for it and the net effect was that just took them a bit longer to find "home" the first time.

    7. Re:Unknown by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, considering humans in almost modern form have lived through at least one pole reversal, and land live has lived through hundreds or thousands, cataclysm is pretty unlikely.

    8. Re:Unknown by Tangent128 · · Score: 1

      Electronics don't depend on external magnetic fields; the only concern is a lack of protection from space weather in the meanwhile. Worst case, I imagine somebody makes a killing selling Faraday blankets.

    9. Re:Unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's not like we had reporters back then.

      Elect McCain! I'm sure he remembers what he did last time...

    10. Re:Unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering we have to look for evidence of the previous switches in three-quarter-of-a-million year old sediment, any data we have on effects is going to be open to interpretation. It's not like we had reporters back then.

      Your faith in reporters far exceeds mine. I'd trust the physical evidence first.

    11. Re:Unknown by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      If you see a bird suddenly turning around, you'll know it's time to seek shelter.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    12. Re:Unknown by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It's not like we had reporters back then.

      A magnetic-pole reversal kills off all the reporters??? How can we speed this thing up?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:Unknown by Goat+Nutrition · · Score: 1

      I am a bit out of date on this ... but the probable outcome of a reversal is that the field turns into a *relatively* short-lived quadrupole , possibly a multipole system, then the dipole reforms. The field doesn't vanish - conservation of energy, etc. The most likely problem is the Van Allen belts moving inwards a bit, raising particle levels on satellites. Ground level effects - don't know, but I'd be surprised if there isn't some trace analysis that could be performed if you can find a reliable proxy for field strength - atmospheric isotope ratios, or core magnetostratigraphy on recent sediments? Re birds, are there any examples of birds using *only* magnetic north, where they couldn't use the sun, landmarks, etc. for navigation? Otherwise I'd have thought they'd use a combination - after all, all their progenitors have been through a couple of reversals and presumably didn't all fly north for the winter and die?

  6. Hmmmm.... by wifiwaves · · Score: 1

    I heard it happened with a Clockwork Orange...

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Love the look in his eyes by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Funny

    The guy who runs the 26 ton ball of molten metal. That's a Mad Scientist gleam in the eyes if ever I saw one.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  9. Best quote ever by e2d2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without GPS, our airliners will also plough into the ground

    Goddamit man, we can't land without GPS!

    Good thing Lindberg had GPS, otherwise he would've gotten lost like Earhart did when her GPS failed.

    GPS approaches are actually relatively new and are just now in the past few years showing up on modern Jeppsen charts.

    That being said, modern GPS based navigation is so sweet. Nothing is sweeter than jumping into a plane with a G1000 GPS based system, complete with XM weather and traffic warning systems and seeing it all on configurable glass panels. But if it fails there is always backup "classic" gauges one can use. And even if that fails there is ye olde grey matter.

     

    1. Re:Best quote ever by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      ...and disregarding that a magnetic pole-switch has nothing to do with GPS-satelites we can conclude...

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    2. Re:Best quote ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I build the navigation systems used in many commercial aircraft. Primary system is inertial, not GPS; input from multiple accelerometers is integrated to determine velocity and position.

    3. Re:Best quote ever by e2d2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a software developer and I once picked up a few college textbooks on aerospace navigation, specifically ones related to control system design (state methods, optimal filtering/control, etc). and I have to say one thing - you sir are a God amongst mere mortals. To say it's tough is an understatement.

    4. Re:Best quote ever by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Let's see... A current commercial airliner will probably have all the following:

      GPS type systems
      Inertial reference systems (two primary, one backup, each system having internal redundancy as well, on the aircraft I deal with)
      Maps and windows
      Magnetic backup compass
      Gyroscope-based instruments for attitude control etc
      Radio to talk to air traffic control operators
      Mk 1 Human Eyeball.

      Oh, and pretty much all the above are at least once redundant, if not more.

      So yeah, as the parent said, even if magnetic changes affected GPS systems, and that doesn't seem possible, it wouldn't be that much of an issue.

    5. Re:Best quote ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I've worked with some of the people doing similar system for GPS based, but IMU corrected vehicle tracking. We had 1-2cm accuracy lidar imaging, including exact track of the vehicle as it went over speed bumps and potholes. Really cool stuff. Some of it is similar to the type of equipment used for the DARPA grand challenge.

    6. Re:Best quote ever by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Umm folks Zero velocity at the same time as Zero (relative) Altitude is not all that hard

      (doing that and being able to use the same airframe again is a bit harder)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    7. Re:Best quote ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading an NTSB report about a plane (DC 6?) that suffered a partial power outage in IFR conditions. As it turns out, the instruments were still working, but after the cabin lights went out, the pilot didn't trust any of the electrical instrumentation, and relied only on the vacuum powered instruments. On the black box recording, he can be heard several times saying "needle, ball, airspeed," before he pulled a JFK Junior into the ground.

    8. Re:Best quote ever by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      My first job out of college (1987-90) was designing embedded controller hardware/firmware for inertial nav systems. Nothing quite as critical as keeping aircraft on track -- our systems were used to measure in-flight deformation of aircraft wings, and to track pipeline flows; nothing requiring real-time processing of the data. Back in those days, GPS was still classified; one of our platforms was built to take GPS signals as a calibration input; as I recall we didn't have a GPS receiver in house, so testing it was out of our hands.

      Since our company's main product line at the time was tuned-rotor gyros, our main INS platform used two gyros and three single-axis accelerometers to provide full 3D position/velocity/acceleration info. I also had to write DOS-based post-processing software to integrate the accel data.

      When I first started there, I had just gotten my degrees in physics, maths, and computer engineering, so the software wasn't too big of a challenge, as I had taken a few numerical methods classes as part of my maths curriculum. The only part of the job that really challenged me was understanding how the gyros worked -- I even tried slogging through Klein/Sommerfeld to gain understanding. Fortunately, I didn't really need to know too much of the theory to get the job done.

    9. Re:Best quote ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write software for the navigation systems used on many military surface platforms (tanks, mobile guns, etc) and some aircraft platforms. Can I please use that comment on my year-end review?

    10. Re:Best quote ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm the AC who builds navigation systems for military aircraft, and we navigate primarily by brain-computer interfaces to homing pigeons mounted in the nose cone.

      See, just because my story is unbelievable doesn't make one that sounds more plausible accurate. This is why reputation is important.

  10. Listen by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just because I don't have a fancy "doctorate" or even "college education", doesn't mean you can just dismiss my theories! Einstein didn't go to college after all, look where he ended up!

    I'm telling you, my theory is solid. I saw this show on the History Channel the other day that was talking about what kind of propulsion UFO's might use, and it came to me: What would happen if the Earth's magnetic field happened every 780,000 years and 300 days, exactly? That would mean it would happen again in November! Our only hope is to align every source of magnetic material in the world along north-south magnetic lines! I've already done this with my stove, fridge, and just to be safe my wireless network. I encourage all of you to do the same!

    I am not crazy people! My scientific theories are backed up by some of the finest dramatization programs the Discovery Channel has to offer!

    1. Re:Listen by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      Sadly, when you said it would happen in November, I was expecting you to start in on how it was all the Democrat's fault, and how we should vote for the Repubs to keep it from happening again.

    2. Re:Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly the mods have lost their sense of humor.

      The parent post should be modded (spelling?) 'funny.'

    3. Re:Listen by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am not crazy people! My scientific theories are backed up by some of the finest dramatization programs the Discovery Channel has to offer!

      We might have listened to you, but the people at UniverseToday have been staying at a Holiday Inn Express, so they're much better informed...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein didn't go to college after all, look where he ended up!

      6 ft deep, do you wanna go there?

    5. Re:Listen by FuckTheModerators · · Score: 1

      Even better than the Discovery Channel, your theory's also backed up by Gene Ray and the TimeCube.

      Rock Chalk indeed.

    6. Re:Listen by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No need for everyone to panic. We'll build a giant underground facility for /. users. I'll round up a bunch of shotguns and anti-mutant shells, the rest of you get food, pron, and every video on Youtube, and as many internet memes are you can carry!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  11. It's all hopelessly out of date! by mdm42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The fact is that the last serious efforts to measure the Earth's magnetic field in the South Atlantic were terminated in the mid-1980's when the British government pulled the funding for their geomagnetic programme in the South Atlantic. Everything that's been speculated upon since then is postulated on their measurements of rapid ans significant weakening of the magnetic field in the South Atlantic... but nobody's been watching since the mid-80's.

    So we don't really know.

    Last time anybody bothered to look, there was a local North Pole in the South Atlantic. But that was 25 years ago. And nobody can be bothered to fund looking again.

    Never mind that any significant change in the Earth's magnetic field will have serious impact on the Van Allen belts and therefore on minor shit like communication satellites, space stations and the ionosphere...

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
    1. Re:It's all hopelessly out of date! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's utter nonsense. The magnetic field is continuously monitored from orbit by all sorts of satellites. One of many such satellites is Ørsted. There are papers all through the 1990s and 2000s that analyze the data from this and the others. People don't fund surface expeditions to study large-scale magnetic field variations because they've been largely superceded by satellite measurements. The only people interested in surface measurements are usually exploration geologists (e.g., looking for signs of sub-surface mineral deposits).

    2. Re:It's all hopelessly out of date! by thogard · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the sats that are measuring the magnetic field are way too low to be very useful and the data seems to show they are missing massive changes for years. One example is the two N poles that are forming west of Perth. One of them showed up about the time rain stopped and the other had to have been there about the same amount of time based on related fields but showed up a few years later. I expect that what is going on at the peak of the magnetosphere has a significant effect on global weather patterns but most of our info on it comes from satellite that were on their way to out other jobs and you can't really park a satellite there.

  12. Nature won't be the cause. by owlnation · · Score: 1

    While it is really dangerous out there sometimes, and a lot of people take nature for granted (Hurricane Katrina, anyone). I'm less concerned about humanity being wiped out in a giant EMP than I am about humanity wiping itself out in a stupendous act of stupidity.

    I guarantee you, when we have this conversation again in heaven or hell, it was some retarded human in a position of power that killed us all.

    Never underestimate the stupidity of humanity. A huge killer EMP would perhaps be a welcome relief.

    1. Re:Nature won't be the cause. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never underestimate the stupidity of humanity.

      Someone needs a poster:
      http://www.despair.com/idiocy.html

  13. Hidden objectives. by dtmancom · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real question is, how can we torpedo our economy in order to prevent it?

    1. Re:Hidden objectives. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be kinda like firing torpedos at the Titanic just to make sure it stays sunk?

      /me ducks

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  14. All we need is a lvl 86 mage by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    And let him cast Dispell. Should work against any "geomagnetic reversal" buff cast on the earth.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:All we need is a lvl 86 mage by shermo · · Score: 1

      03:45:12 = Dispel Fail: You fail to dispel Earthlol's geomagnetic reversal
      03:45:13 = Dispel Fail: You fail to dispel Earthlol's geomagnetic reversal
      03:45:15 = Dispel Fail: You fail to dispel Earthlol's geomagnetic reversal

      Unfortunately "Earthlol" is a druid, and has points in subtlety.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    2. Re:All we need is a lvl 86 mage by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1
      No no no. You need a warblade to initiate "Iron Heart Surge".

      When you use this maneuver, select one spell, effect, or other condition currently affecting you with a duration of 1 or more rounds. That effect ends immediately.

      Since the Earth's magnetic field is affecting him, sounds like problem solved to me. And he's only gotta be 5th level!

  15. Only Room for One Doomsday Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and global warming has that all wrapped up.

    And of course, there's no way to make political or monetary gain on something that you absolutely cannot change.

  16. Ah, pay attention to the article ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    It's not just molten metal; it's molten SODIUM!

    If you've ever seen a small chunk of pure sodium tossed into a sink full of water in a high school chemistry class ... and then think how much this guy has ... you'd have that look in your eyes as well.

    He's probably planning to dump it into his neighbor's swimming pool when the experiment is finished.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Ah, pay attention to the article ... by harry666t · · Score: 1

      Holy crap. Who needs 2012 when he has this kind of shit.

    2. Re:Ah, pay attention to the article ... by fyoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you've ever seen a small chunk of pure sodium tossed into a sink full of water in a high school chemistry class ... and then think how much this guy has ...

      Here's a blog post with a couple of vids of sodium water reactions. The US military's post WWII disposal of sodium in a lake is particularly impressive.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Article makes unscientific conclusions. by wolferz · · Score: 1

    The UniverseToday article repeatedly points out that there is no evidence to support the dooms day theories regarding geomagnetic reversal and admits to not knowing how geomagnetic reversal works.

    "Again, we simply do not know."
    "Again, there is absolutely no scientific evidence to support this claim."

    Then he says something most curious:

    "So, already this doomsday theory falters in that geomagnetic reversal does not occur with "clockwork regularity," and it has no connection with solar dynamics. We are not due a magnetic flip as we cannot predict when the next one is going to occur, magnetic reversals occur at seemingly random points in history."

    Well you know what. Back at'cha bub. There is no evidence to support your theories ether. There is no evidence stating geomagnetic reversal *isn't* related to the solar cycle. And there is no evidence stating we are not due for such a reversal.

    Absence of proof is not proof of absence. He goes on to ignore this simple fact of logic throughout the rest of his article, repeatedly using that there is no evidence supporting the claims as if it were proof that the claims are wrong.

    I don't think the doomsayers are right... but I take issue with a so called "solar physics doctor" (ie a scientist) is using such horribly flawed reasoning to support his claims.

    1. Re:Article makes unscientific conclusions. by profplump · · Score: 1

      He isn't making claims. He's disputing claims that other have made.

      By your reasoning we're "due" to spontaneously lose our left index fingers in the next generation because it's technically possible there's no evidence to suggest that we're not.

    2. Re:Article makes unscientific conclusions. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      "Absence of proof is not proof of absence. He goes on to ignore this simple fact of logic throughout the rest of his article"

      It may be a fact of logic, but it is a rather useless one.

      The article says, "We are not due a magnetic flip as we cannot predict [...] the next one."
      Then you say, "Well you know what. Back at'cha bub. There is no evidence to support your theories ether."

      Although, in this case, his evidence that we cannot predict the next one is in fact "the absence of evidence." So, I guess in this case, your fact of logic is wrong, and the fact that we have no method of predicting something does in fact mean that we cannot predict it.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  19. compasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason I'd really be worried about the magnetic field flipping is that a changing magnetic field induces a current in a conductor. This means every electronic and electrical device with a closed loop would experience a large current, likely destroying the smaller equipment.

    The earth's magnetic field is about half a gauss at the surface. It's weaker than the field generated by a refrigerator magnet. I think it's safe to say that the flip is not gonna destroy your electronics.

    No, but it may reek havoc on analogue navigational instruments, and the migration of many animals (there's a hypothesis that birds use the magnetic field to know where to go).

    It's hard to tell what flip would do to modern society and the earth's ecosystem.

    1. Re:compasses by MechEMark · · Score: 1

      No, but it may reek havoc on analogue navigational instruments, and the migration of many animals (there's a hypothesis that birds use the magnetic field to know where to go).

      It's hard to tell what flip would do to modern society and the earth's ecosystem.

      ...but on the subject of our everyday compasses, they shouldn't be at all affected considering that they point to a lump of iron ore in Canada rather than the actual North Pole (hence a correction of ~-11/12 degrees when I go hiking in Harriman)

    2. Re:compasses by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Actually your compass points at the north magnetic pole, which actually moves and your correction will change with time. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_North_Pole

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:compasses by Kagura · · Score: 1

      You are actually converting between:
      "the earth's ACTUAL magnetic north pole", and
      "the non-magnetic, man-defined north pole of the globe"

      It has to do with the north on your map not actually corresponding with the true, magnetic north pole. That is to say, exactly "up" on your map is not exactly "north", due to how the cartographer set it up. There are different magnetic deviations depending on where you are in the world and how your map system is set up, but I assure you that none of the magnetic deviation written on your map sheet is from giant stores of iron ore in the Earth's crust. That's not to say that there aren't magnetic anomalies caused by underground metal deposits, but that's not marked on maps and that's not why they have magnetic deviations between the compass and the map.

    4. Re:compasses by swamp_ig · · Score: 1

      The north pole isn't 'Man Defined' at all. It's the rotational pole. IE: If you stood at the north pole the stars on the horizon would neither rise nor set.

      Both the magnetic and rotational poles tend to wander slightly over time. The magnetic pole wanders due to changes in the earth's internal dynamo, and the rotational pole changes due to gravitaional interactions with the moon and other planets.

  20. Don't worry by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

    why is this a cataclysm?

    It really isn't. The problem itself is not the reversal itself, but the period inbetween, when the magnetic field will be very small or inexistent. The earth's magnetic field has the effect of diverting charged energetic particles emitted by the sun towards the poles. It's those particles entering the atmosphere that cause the northern lights. Without a magnetic field, they would penetrate more into the atmosphere, possibly causing harm to living beings.

    However, this reversal will happen several hundred years from now. By that time, I'm sure that, if I'm alive, it will be because we will have some pretty advanced medicine, capable of handling the increased radiation effects.

    1. Re:Don't worry by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the article stated that even if the magnetic poles shift happens in our lifetime, it doesn't mean that we won't have any magnetic field at all, just weaker. It states that at most we'll see aurorae in places never seen before, while the poles changes.

    2. Re:Don't worry by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, the earth's magnetic envelope, but even a weaker magnetic field means more radiation hits people, doesn't it? Of course, the next question is how much weaker? Increase cancer risk 1% on average or 25% increase in severe sunburn deaths? It could still be an issue.

    3. Re:Don't worry by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dunno. I stil think cellphone anntenas can affect more in this cancer matter than something that has happened before in Earth with no big impact at all. And sunburn is related more to ozone layer, which (as far as I know, I could be wrong) isn't affected by the earth magnetic field.

    4. Re:Don't worry by mangu · · Score: 5, Informative

      I still think cellphone antennas can affect more in this cancer matter than something that has happened before in Earth with no big impact at all

      Cell phones transmit at a relatively low frequency, which is called "non-ionizing".

      Electromagnetic radiation is transmitted by particles called photons, each of which carry a fixed amount of energy, proportional to its frequency. Therefore, to transmit a given amount of power, it takes more low-frequency photons than high-frequency ones. There is a certain frequency, higher than what cell phones use, where the energy of a single photon is enough to break the chemical bonds that keep molecules together, that's what is called "ionization".

      At lower, "non-ionizing" frequencies, you can send as much power as you want, you may cook the tissue, but the chemical bonds will not be broken in the same way, because the photons don't have the required energy.

      The sun emits particles in a very wide range of energies, including ionizing ones. The charged particles with ionizing energy which are diverted by the earth's magnetic field are certainly more dangerous than any cell phone antenna.

      The dangers of non-ionizing radiation have been the subject of debate, but one should be careful when judging the data. With high enough power, like in a microwave oven, there will be damage to living tissues, of course, but it's in an entirely different level from ionizing radiation, where a single photon is enough to break a molecule and, pick your worse nightmare, start a cancer or cause a mutation.

    5. Re:Don't worry by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      pick your worse nightmare, start a cancer or cause a mutation.

      Mutations that /don't/ lead to cancer seem rather unlikely to lead to systemic issues - sure, that one cell might be broken, but the others are doing fine.

    6. Re:Don't worry by nicodoggie · · Score: 1

      ...if I'm alive, it will be because we will have some pretty advanced medicine, capable of handling the increased radiation effects.

      Not to mention a magnetic field generator that would replace the need for the Earth's magentic field

  21. 4 * 10-13 Hz by S-100 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't think a field change at .0000000000004 Hz is going to induce much current anywhere.

    TFA does little to debunk what may be the biggest danger, and that is the disruption of the Van Allen radiation belt, and the protection that it provides to the Earth from cosmic rays. While I'm sure that the radiation belt would re-establish itself to match the "flipped" magnetic poles, it may not do so during the transition period. And this pole flipping may be quick in geological terms, but it may take a number of years, and during that time, part or all of the Earth may be bombarded with cosmic rays. Or, the distorted field may actually concentrate cosmic rays upon parts of the Earth many times what you'd find in space outside the belt. These cosmic rays would cause massive increases in cancer and genetic mutations in all species of plants and animals, and even a stack of tinfoil hats won't help. Much.

    Increases in cancers would not be detected in the geological records, and periods of high radiation may explain things like the Cambrian Explosion, where many new species spontaneously appeared. If the field swaps by rotating from pole to pole, the radiation belt will probably just follow along, but if the poles swap by diminishing to zero and then building at the opposite pole, there will be a very dramatic change (and possible collapse) of the radiation belt that could very well affect life on the planet very dramatically (from our perspective). The scourge of AIDS killed 2.1 million people in 2007. That's .03% of the world population. Just a doubling of the current rate of death due to cancer would kill 7.9 million people - almost four times that of AIDS. And with sufficient radiation exposure, the cancer rate could well escalate way beyond 2X.

    Of course, ancient calendars not withstanding, there's no reason to believe any of this is likely to happen during our lifetimes.

  22. Offtopic: Can we mesure the weak magnet field? by jopsen · · Score: 1
    Quote from the third article about the second, weaker magnet field:

    During those periods of time, weakening of the main field reveals "virtual poles," regions of strong magnetism within the shallow core field. For example, Singer says, "If you were on Tahiti when those eruptions were taking place, your compass needle would point to not the North Pole, not the South Pole, but Australia."

    Would it be possible to measure this magnet field now? e.g. the direction of this magnet field?

    If so wouldn't it enable us to do predict our position on earth without stars/sun and time as in the old days, or GPS as used these days?


    Just a random thought, I don't know if we can distinguish the two fields (which we probably can't apart from strength), or/and if the weak field is too weak to be measured. Does anybody have a clue?

    1. Re:Offtopic: Can we mesure the weak magnet field? by perlchild · · Score: 1

      each individual iron atom was said to have its own tiny field in one lecture I had... I would think it would certainly be possible to have a "Secondary field" but how do we tell if it's pernament, or just an effect of the iron atoms lining up in large groups, without the "straightening" influence of the main field.. I have no clue. And I'm not sure we know how that all works yet either(why a secondary field, but no tertiary field? is the secondary field a mechanism that happens in the mantle, but just the result of the magma having mobile magnetic particles? [Think what happens when you melt a floppy drive... it has a field, it's good enough to be "read" until the support melts, now project that to a medium that's molten magnatic media in suspension...]) Bunch of unanswered questions, and we don't have a working model, although a 25 ton molden "mantle" sounds like a start...

  23. Fearmongering by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    I saw a show on this on PBS a while back. They kept playing this really ominous music, the narrator was constantly making frightening suggestions-but-not-declarations like "Could a magnetic pole reversal have killed off the dinosaurs?" Of course, the answer turned out to be no. The whole effect actually managed to get me a little worried about what the punchline would be (yes, I am SO gullible, but at least I'm self-aware about it), but at the end they were just like... Yeah, you'll be able to see the aurora borealis in London fifty years from now. Oh.

    But if someone had only been paying half-attention to the show, they totally could have come away with the impression that we're in big trouble.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    1. Re:Fearmongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually really good news for me about seeing the Aurora in London fifty years from now, since I am now 57 years old!!!!!

    2. Re:Fearmongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a show on this on PBS a while back. They kept playing this really ominous music, the narrator was constantly making frightening suggestions-but-not-declarations like "Could a magnetic pole reversal have killed off the dinosaurs?" Of course, the answer turned out to be no.

      Graaagh! I saw that show too. It's Nova, which used to be the best science show on TV until they tried to make it more interesting to the average public. Now it's full of of goofy graphics and silly statements and they explain the same stuff three times or more times, because that's they way everyone says you need to teach people these days. "Tell them what your going to tell them, tell them, tell them what you said." Boooooooring!!!!

    3. Re:Fearmongering by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      That was Nova? Really? Wow, I didn't realize they'd gone so tabloid. Blech.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  24. Re:Offtopic: Can we measure the weak magnet field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At any given point, the magnetic field you measure will be the vector sum of all the fields acting there at that time. So you will measure one resultant, no matter how many fields there are, and from the information at that one point it is not possible to infer how many fields there are. Measurements at multiple points might give enough information to infer the number of field sources.

    But of course if one source goes away, it is then possible to measure any remaining sources. I presume this can be done historically by looking at the magnetism locked into rock that was molten and then set at the particular time. Provided the rock has not been moved significantly, it will retain the field in the direction of the then current global field.

  25. Reading... an elegant tool... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ... for a more civilized times.

    As can be seen from the diagram (left), magnetic reversal has occurred fairly chaotically in the last 160 million years. Long-term data suggests that the longest stable period between magnetic "flips" is nearly 40 million years (during the Cretaceous period over 65 million years BC) and the shortest is a few hundred years.

    Some 2012 theories suggest that the Earth's geomagnetic reversal is connected to the natural 11-year solar cycle. Again, there is absolutely no scientific evidence to support this claim. No data has ever been produced suggesting a Sun-Earth magnetic polarity change connection.

    So, already this doomsday theory falters in that geomagnetic reversal does not occur with "clockwork regularity," and it has no connection with solar dynamics. We are not due a magnetic flip as we cannot predict when the next one is going to occur, magnetic reversals occur at seemingly random points in history.

    Well you know what. Back at'cha bub. There is no evidence to support your theories ether. There is no evidence stating geomagnetic reversal *isn't* related to the solar cycle. And there is no evidence stating we are not due for such a reversal.

    See graph on the FA.

    BTW... just to clarify - something "random" can not have a 11-year cycle. Integer described cycle is NOT RANDOM.
    Ergo... no connection or even correlation between the 11-year solar cycle and magnetic shifts.

    Also... being "due" for something implies prediction.
    As of yet - we are not able to predict random events. Even ones with 160 million years of previous cases.
    Just because there is a minuscule chance of me being hit by a meteor right now...
    OK... nothing happened...

      ... that does not mean that I am "due" to be hit by a meteor.
    Or to win a lottery.
    .
    .
    .
    OK... still not being hit by a meteor...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  26. Debunking Doomsday Myths? by jvkjvk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article is actually a rant against the 2112 Millenialism of a particular strain of people that have imprinted the mayan great cycle myth at a precognitive level through the influence of McKenna (whether they know it or not). At best, the article says that it's not very probable that a reversal will happen in our lifetime and if it does, "satellites may malfunction and migrating birds may become confused" but that's about it. Without a shred of proof given to that. It could presumably be much worse, so we should probably at least look at it.

    though I do concur that the world probably won't end dec 21 2012.

    However it also makes reference to a type of potentially catastrophic type event, a 'polar shift', which is really rare. Of course, all that means is that it is eventually inevitable. So there's another ticking clock. Has anyone come up with a clock incorporating all the known doomsday events that are actually going to happen sooner or later? e.g. catastrophic asteroid, polar shift, super solar event, whatnot? Would be interesting.

    1. Re:Debunking Doomsday Myths? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      The article is actually a rant against the 2112 Millenialism of a particular strain of people that have imprinted the mayan great cycle myth at a precognitive level through the influence of McKenna (whether they know it or not).

      Um, I thought that was the Temple of Syrinx and Rush.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Debunking Doomsday Myths? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      though I do concur that the world probably won't end dec 21 2012.

      Yes, you should always bet (everything you have) AGAINST the world ending...

      If it doesn't end, you win!
      If it does end, who's going to collect?

      If you best FOR doomsday, you lose, and you walk around looking like the world's biggest idiot for the next 60 years... ala many cults and charlatans.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Debunking Doomsday Myths? by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      Right, sorry. Should be 2012, not 2112, the mayan cycle ends in 2012. Would have been cool if Rush had picked 2012 but I suspect that was too near term to be of value for their storyline. What is very strange is that I thought I had corrected that error before posting. Just goes to show that even if you do error detection & correction errors can get through.

  27. Re:in light of the up-and-coming nigger president by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    in light of the up-and-coming nigger president

    Ha ha. You get to be a black man or hold an equivalent social position in your next life. Guaranteed. You can tell yourself it isn't true, but in those dark, private moments when you're not so sure. . , that's when truth is calling. It's called 'Karama', dude, and you're racking up a helluva debt. Don't believe in Karma? Doesn't matter. You are screwed and deep (deep) down inside, you know I'm right.

    -FL

  28. Not just the Mayans by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    Mayan's aren't the only ones that have a calendar that has an interesting timeline, Nasa too has predicted the beginning of Solar Cycle #24 which hits its maxis around 2012. Between possibilities of a geomagnetic reversal, super coronal mass ejections and the gravitational affects on our planet and sun as we pass through the galactic equinox should provide for some interesting times!

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  29. Whatever you do ... by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    don't eat the Soylent Green!

  30. any relationship to climate change? by cavebison · · Score: 1

    TFA states: "The Earth's magnetic field is measured to vary in field strength and it is a well known fact that the magnetic field strength is currently experiencing a downward trend."

    Being a complete lay-person at climatology etc. I can't help but ask a possibly silly question; if there may be a connection between the charged particles entering our atmosphere at any period and subsequent changes in temperature or weather patterns.

    Are there any studies of possible connections there?

    1. Re:any relationship to climate change? by DamienRBlack · · Score: 1

      It would be a pretty strained relation if it did exist. Charged particles probably have very little climate effect compared to the giant death ball bombarding us with photons.

      If you're going to those lengths, possibly you should just break down and admit that -we- are causing climate change. There is defiantly a higher correlation. Occam's Razor you know. It is a pretty simple explanation. Lets be scientific.

    2. Re:any relationship to climate change? by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Fair enough - kind of. I always have a problem with Occam's Razor. "Simple" is a very relative concept. "God made everything the way it is" is pretty simple. O.R. assumes everyone has the same values and world view.

      Anyway, as for "being scientific", science is full of major discoveries made by people who asked seemingly silly and unconventional questions, like "what if I was sitting on a beam of light" and "what if the heavens aren't made up of glass spheres". So saying "let's be scientific" should be an invitation to question, not a deterrent.

    3. Re:any relationship to climate change? by insllvn · · Score: 1

      I would think the simplest answer to "why is it getting hotter on earth?" would be the giant fireball in the sky is heating up, as it is want to do in a somewhat cyclical fashion. I understand that there is more nuance to the situation, and that we are indeed contributing to climate shift (even if no one has explained to me why it was fine for the climate to fluctuate for some 4,500,000,000 years but it mustn't be allowed now that we have noticed), but doesn't that put the lie to Occam's Razor? Science and the simplest explanation rarely go hand in hand, particularly in as complicated and vast a system as global climate.

  31. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod, I loved that cell!

  32. The last occured 780,000 years ago? by Dr+La · · Score: 1

    The Brunhes-Matuyama reversal at 780000 yrs ago was a major reversal, yes: but within the Brunhes epoch, after 780,000 yrs ago, there were several smaller, i.e. short-lasting, reversals.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
  33. Wrong - there still is a field by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The field may fdrop to about a third intentisty at most. This has been measured in volcanic rocks in Oregon for the last flip.

  34. Twice a Year! No? by WED+Fan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought this happened twice a year and Congress mandated it. Spring forward and fall back and all that.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  35. I said this already by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I laid claim to the world's 3rd axis a while back when I read the story of the equator getting wider from the melting of the polar ice caps, which led me to believe that there was in fact 3 rd axis to the earth, in its quest to circle the sun. No one quite took me seriously, however, if you take this into consideration, it could be the reason we are experiencing global warming of sorts, it isnt gloabl warming, as much more then a shift of the axis, which is throwing certain continents out of wack....imagine now canada is the england and iceland is now poland and etc...etc... we may have small shifts, depending at what point of reference the shift is happening from a 360% position.

    If you take a cueball from the game of pool, when you put a spin on it, you will aim high to make it go low, similar to aiming low to make it go high, etc...so depending on where the focal point is located, the shift would have to be calculated from there to know which continent is now which!

    "And they said math was easy!"

  36. Would a nuclear war trigger a geomagnetic reversal by psyced · · Score: 1

    Okay, we have a couple of thousand years to go, but what if this crazy human species lets off hundreds of nuclear explosions at the same time. Isn't that likely to trigger a geomagnetic reversal? As it seems, such a reversal will probably be the least of our problems in such a situation, but for the sake of completeness I want to ask this question. Would the "geography" of nuclear explosions be of relevance (all in one place vs. distributed over the planet). I presume no-one can tell, huh?

  37. The reversals frozen in the mid-Alantic ... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    out flowings aren't due to flips of the Earth's magnetosphere?

    mmm... Geologists have been claiming magnetic flips since Warner. From the National Research Council of Canada:
    http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/education/astronomy/tapping/2007/2007-05-29.html

    The Atlantic Ocean is getting a few centimetres wider each year. Molten rock is emerging from the Earth's mantle at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, providing new seabed, and as it solidifies, records the magnetic field. As we move away from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, we encounter progressively older rocks, forming a continuous record many millions of years long. It turns out that on the average, the Earth's magnetic field reverses every 500,000 years or so. The rocks tell us the last reversal happened about 780,000 years ago, making the next reversal overdue. At the point of transition the Earth's magnetic field vanishes, along with our protection. Strange changes in the magnetic field in the South Atlantic could indicate the transition has started. If this is true, what can we expect?

    The literature if filled with research using magnetic reversals to prove various hypotheses. Also, the magnetic reversal is sited as a proof against Creationists contention that the Earth is less than 25K years old and the magnetic field hasn't reversed itself.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  38. Dogs and cats living together.... by SocraTease · · Score: 1

    From TFA..."with a reversing magnetic field comes a weakening in the Earth's ability to deflect cosmic rays. Our armada of communication and military satellites will drop from orbit, adding to the chaos on the ground.
    There will be social unrest, warfare, famine and economic collapse."

    So..., what's new?