Slashdot Mirror


Two Europeans Indicted In US For 2003 DDOS Attacks

narramissic writes "In a continuation of the first successful U.S. investigation ever into DDOS attacks, Axel Gembe, 25, of Germany and Lee Graham Walker, 24, of England were indicted Thursday by a grand jury in Los Angeles, California, on one count of conspiracy and one count of intentionally damaging a computer system. The two men were allegedly hired by Jay R. Echouafni, owner of Orbit Communication, a Massachusetts-based company that sold home satellite systems, to carry out DDOS attacks against two of Orbit's competitors."

24 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Criminal Minds by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It takes a genius to hire a couple of people to do your dirty work. It takes even greater genius to accept money to damage computer systems, from a complete stranger who would never rat you out.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Criminal Minds by Ash+Vince · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why has this been modded flamebait? it seems like a valid point to me and also to most legal systems (including the US). The person who commissioned a crime to be committed is surely just as guilty as the people who committed it?

      All three of them should be tried together and face the same penalty.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  2. Re:Tax Dollars by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a criminal investigation. If Company A vandalizes Company B, do you expect Company B to "bring their own evidence to court"?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  3. Re:Tax Dollars by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps it wasn't that easy to figure out the real $ource of the attack. --I am very curious as to what may happen to Orbit though.

  4. Revoke by Improv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This seems like a good time to consider revoking Orbit Communications' corporate charter.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Revoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think there will be any repercussions for Orbit, considering they are a Saudi-based company (http://www.zawya.com/cm/profile.cfm/cid1001503/). They couldn't go after the company, so they went after the people. I wish that's how it worked in US corporations.

    2. Re:Revoke by idontgno · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe he can run a lemonade stand.

      Well, right now, he's running... like the fugitive scum that he is.

      http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/fugitives/cyber/echouafni_s.htm

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Revoke by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know its inconvenient, but perhaps we could wait until after the trial and conviction to exact punishment.

  5. sigh by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and all they had to do was post a made-up "home satellite" article to slashdot.

  6. Re:Tax Dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Judging by the fact that the Grand Jury is in California, the crime was committed against a party in another state. Thus federal jurisdiction.

  7. Extradition from the UK to US by MattLees · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Based on the UK Govs attitude to bending over whenever the US Gov requests someone to be extradited I wouldn't want to be in Lee Graham Walker's shoes right now.

    1. Re:Extradition from the UK to US by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus you can hardly blame them for honoring a treaty and all.

      Watch me.
      We should never have signed up to such a wide-ranging treaty (a fact which has become abundantly clear recently) - I expect our government to frustrate the process of complying with the treaty as much as possible whilst simultaneously working to get out of it.

      I don't have the data, but I suspect they extradite people to France as well.

      The French justice system is a damn-sight more civilised than the US one.

      --
      FGD 135
    2. Re:Extradition from the UK to US by Ogive17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what's your experience with the US and French judicial systems? I'm interested in hearing your first-hand account of your experiences dealing with both.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Extradition from the UK to US by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      The difference with extraditing to France is that it works both ways. With the US it unfortunately isn't.

      I wish this particular idea would quietly give up the ghost. It's just not true.

      There is a valid, reciprocal, extradition treaty between the USA and the UK. The UK has, in addition, ratified a revision to that Treaty that the US Senate hasn't bothered to ratify yet. Which means the revision is valid in the UK (assuming the brits choose to treat it as valid - they don't have to, since it hasn't been ratified here), but the original treaty is still valid in the USA (and in the UK, assuming the brits choose to treat the revision as not yet valid, since it hasn't been ratified by the Senate).

      Which means that people can be (and are) extradited to the UK from the USA when the appropriate paperwork is submitted to whatever department of the US government handles such things. Just like happens when the USA wants to extradite someone from the UK.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Extradition from the UK to US by shermo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The last executions took place in 1977"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_France

      I think that's a good place to start.

      Of course that depends if you consider killing peeople 'civilized'.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
  8. The interesting part by bendodge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I think it's a good thing that international cyber-vandalism (or whatever you want to call it) is being investigated in regular courts (instead of some super-world thingy), I think the most interesting part is the charges against Lee Graham Walker. According to the article, his crime was using IRC to chat with Gembe about the botnet's code. Now, I'm not a legal expert or even legal savvy, but that sounds like a charge that would easily apply to a lot of geeks who IM with geeks short on ethics. I don't think it's being misused in this case, but it does sound like a pretty wide net.

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:The interesting part by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's quite clearly misuse. Any IRC recording by the investigation entitiy would result in inadmissable evidence, at least under the US constitution. Since the "criminals" (as everyone likes calling them) are not US citizens, they aren't covered by the constitution.

      More importantly, a botnet could be used for any number of things. Depending on the actual conversation, Gembe may not have revealed his use, or lied saying it was to test a network he administered.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    2. Re:The interesting part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because the defendants are not US citizens does not mean that Constitutional protections don't apply. The Constitution does not talk about the rights of citizens, but the rights of people. If US law is going to be applied to someone, then the entirety of US law, including the Constitution and its Supremacy Clause, apply.

      So you are wrong. They are covered by the Constitution.

  9. Re:extradition by spacefiddle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lee Graham Walker, a British citizen, and the German malware programmer Axel Gembe have appeared in a federal court in San Francisco...

    I'm guessing yes.

    This article also notes that Gembe may have been the HL2 thief, and that he's been on the hook for this DDoS attack since 2006: this was just their (first?) court appearance for it.

    I have no particular premonition about how this will all turn out. On the one hand, German courts were taking it easy on him as long as he straightened his life out... on the other, the FBI with its "first successful investigation" into a DDoS may wish to make example of. We'll see.

  10. Re:extradition by neuromanc3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're wrong. Germany does extradite citizens, as long as a couple of conditions are met.

    Specifically, the suspect must have committed a crime that is punishable in both countries, must not be tortured or executed after the extradition, needs a fair trial and so on...

  11. Re:Technicality by torchdragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The server was subjected to intentional unusual activities that caused a loss of business services. Is it actual physical damage? I'm not sure. I don't know what the legal definition the law is using.

    Either way, they caused business loss using non-legal practices. "Physical" damage or not, they should have know this would've been the recourse.

    One of my old co-workers decided to delete all the accounts on our Lotus server in China before he left (no, he wasn't trying to do us any favors either) the company. Sure, the "repair" was to reload the database from backup but that constituted damage under national and international law. He got nailed to the wall for it.

    --
    "Don't feel bad for me child; I'm the monster that hides under your bed."
  12. Re:extradition by mapsjanhere · · Score: 2, Informative

    that's why I went back and looked up the German Grundgesetz.
    Artikel 16
    (2) Kein Deutscher darf an das Ausland ausgeliefert werden. Durch Gesetz kann eine abweichende Regelung für Auslieferungen an einen Mitgliedstaat der EuropÃischen Union oder an einen internationalen Gerichtshof getroffen werden, soweit rechtsstaatliche GrundsÃtze gewahrt sind.

    --
    I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  13. Re:extradition by mrvan · · Score: 3, Informative

    "No German can be extradited to another country. The law can create a different arrangement for extraditions to the EU or an international court, as long as fair trial [rule of law] is guaranteed."

    [not a german native speaker, apologies for any mistakes]

  14. Software can damage hardware by Layth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It really depends on the type of hardware involved.

    One example - Limited write memory can be intensely overwritten until it's worn out and rendered useless, resulting in financial loss.
    I don't know if it has anything to do with this case, or if any damage actually occurred.

    Just speaking in terms of technicalities.