Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Hacker 'Mafiaboy' Eight Years On

An anonymous reader writes "Eight years ago Mafiaboy (Michael Calce) knocked Yahoo offline. Today he he works as a legitimate security consultant and has just published a book documenting his criminal career and offering advice on how people can protect themselves from people like him on the Internet."

183 comments

  1. But i thought... by scubamage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that federal law precludes an ex-con from profiting off of their crimes by doing things like writing books, and making movies? I see no issue with him writing a book on computer security, but how is him writing an account of his criminal actions that got him arrested not a breach of this law? Am I missing something? Not trying to be an armchair lawyer, just interested in why.

    1. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably because Canada is not part of the US yet?

    2. Re:But i thought... by pegr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Today he he works as a legitimate security consultant
       
      I believe the problem word here is "legitimate"... If one has that large of a gap in judgement, most "legitimate" employers won't hire you. And that's the way it should be.

    3. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoever modded this flamebait is a dolt. It's the right answer to the question.

    4. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might be flamebait, but it is true. This guy is Canadian, living in Canada. US Federal law ? What about it?
      As to whether he has such a gap in judgement, he was 15 at the time of the hack. Who does not have gaps of judgement at that age?

    5. Re:But i thought... by Nerftoe · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If one has that large of a gap in judgement.. ...When he was 15. Everyone does crazy stuff when they are 15. I know I did. Didn't you?

    6. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common misconception.
      1. Most laws regarding this are state laws.
      2. Reading from wikipedia, most of these laws don't hold up.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_sam_laws

         

    7. Re:But i thought... by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, I'm 93 and I still have gaps of judgement.

      Oh wait, those are gaps of memory.

      Get off my lawn!

    8. Re:But i thought... by thermian · · Score: 2, Informative

      If one has that large of a gap in judgement.. ...When he was 15. Everyone does crazy stuff when they are 15. I know I did. Didn't you?

      No.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    9. Re:But i thought... by pegr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even as a teenager, I had a strong self-preservation instinct. I knew the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.

    10. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two types of people: people who did crazy shit when they were 15 and

      FUCKING LIARS!!

    11. Re:But i thought... by gary_7vn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget unforgiving, robotic cowards. Robocop was a movie, not a manual.

    12. Re:But i thought... by magawr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, I agree. If he hasn't given the profits to help eliminate crime then he should be prosecuted for this under the federal statute. Or has our learned fathers saw fit to provide a loophole so that they might profit from such an endeavor.

      --
      Dr. Klaus Eugen I have promises to keep and miles to go before I sleep and miles to go before I sleep
    13. Re:But i thought... by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's natural to excuse your own behavior by claiming everyone else does it too. Doesn't make it true.

      No, not everyone does "crazy stuff" when they are 15. Many know better.

    14. Re:But i thought... by Probie · · Score: 2, Informative

      zing!

      --
      Who? Who is but the form following the function of what and what I am is a man in a mask.
    15. Re:But i thought... by crapdot · · Score: 1

      Yes! I did know better! (I didn't get caught.)

    16. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Probably because Canada is not part of the US yet?

      Got to love how Canadians write a statement... that ends with a question mark.

    17. Re:But i thought... by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      They have the same law in Canada, not sure how his book relates exactly to the law. There are loopholes though, even in America. Buhs has written a book and profited from it. "By precluding convicted offenders from profiting from their crimes, Bill C-220 would reinforce a fundamental value of Canadian society that criminals should not profit from their crimes. It would also reinforce and give effect to the adage that "crime does not pay." The bill would deem the proceeds received for accounts of criminal acts to be "proceeds of crime" for the purposes of Part XII.2 of the Criminal Code, thus subjecting such proceeds to a forfeiture order under section 462.37. It would also disentitle offenders from having copyright in their works, thus preventing them from receiving royalties from book sales, movie deals and televised interviews. Bill C-220 would not prevent offenders from telling their story. It would simply ensure that they derived no benefit from it."

    18. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tag "extortion". thanks.

    19. Re:But i thought... by gary_7vn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is the loophole. In Canada a young offender's record is expunged after a period of time, after which they are allowed exactly the same rights and privileges as any other Canadian. This protects them from the self-righteous, who would seek to punish them - forever. "...the bill would apply only to accused persons "convicted" of the offence, thus excluding from its reach offenders who were found "not criminally responsible" by reason of a mental disorder or who were "found guilty" as young offenders, or who were granted an absolute or conditional discharge under section 730 of the Criminal Code."

    20. Re:But i thought... by happycat64 · · Score: 0

      So this guy, who fucked up when he was 15, should never be employed by a "legitimate" employer? Nearly everyone deserves a chance for redemption.

    21. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Senator McCain, is that you?

    22. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity you.

    23. Re:But i thought... by SuperSlug · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably because Canada is not part of the US yet?

      Got to love how Canadians write a statement... that ends with a question mark.

      Probably because Canada is not part of the US yet, eh?

      There fixed it for ya.

      --
      The information wants to be free, I just give it somewhere to go.
    24. Re:But i thought... by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Any idea where one can read the text of that law?

    25. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      BY ALL MEANS, LET US PROSECUTE THEM DAMNED CANUCKISTANIS!!!

      Why do so many Americans have trouble understanding that "US law" != "world law"? I live here, and most of the folks walking around here aren't so profoundly retarded, are there enclaves of profound idiots somewhere to bring the average down??

    26. Re:But i thought... by LandDolphin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He should not have said "Everyone". It opens up for responses like yours. A better thing to have said was that "most" do "Crazy stuff" when they are young. That way, the people that have never run with scissors don't need to chime in.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    27. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell did you get +3 informative for simply answering 'no'? Ugh, these mods.

    28. Re:But i thought... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      There's a world of difference between staying out after curfew or getting drunk enough to throw up on your dad when he confronts you as you try to sneak in through the patio door, and knocking a major Web portal offline. Any 15 year old should understand the difference between those two, let alone a 30 year old pining for when he was 15.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    29. Re:But i thought... by banffbug · · Score: 2, Funny

      its' +4 now. Maybe I'll get a +5 for pointing that out. and one of the hidden comments was actually a score 5. wtf...

    30. Re:But i thought... by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Alabama.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    31. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do so many Americans have trouble understanding that "US law" != "world law"?

      It's only a matter of time dude.

      Whether it's Old Man McCain or B'rock Obama -- all your base are belong to the US.

      Just kidding - chill dude;-)

    32. Re:But i thought... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I get mod points 6 days out of 7, and today by some rift in the time-space /. continuum, I have none.

      +99 Truthiness

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    33. Re:But i thought... by thermian · · Score: 1

      I'm given to wonder how I got modded +3 informative for typing 'no'.

      Mind you, it seemed the simplest way to say that some of us manage to get through our teens without committing crimes.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    34. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet is right, just wait till dubya get's a fix on your WMD's

    35. Re:But i thought... by caluml · · Score: 1

      Probably because Canada is not part of the US yet, eh?

      I'm British, and as such, can't really hear a difference between Canada and the US. However, I am trying to learn, so I can continue to mock those North Americans who can't tell the difference between Australian and Scouse. So, whenever I hear a Canadian speaking, I try to look for things that distinguish. And I can't hear any. 'Specially not any 'eh' at the end of the sentence. Please advise.

    36. Re:But i thought... by pankreas · · Score: 1

      It's all in the RRRR's

    37. Re:But i thought... by garaged · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I regret a lot of things I did, even when they weren't that bad, I shouldn't have done a lot, and now I know that I SHOULD have done a lot other fun stuff that would keep me from thinking stupid things to do.

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    38. Re:But i thought... by garaged · · Score: 1

      I replied ageeing, and I will tell you why.

      I was pretty responsable, and I know a lot of people that did way worse things than me, but still immaturity makes you make a lot of stupid things, I know few people that didn't made any notisable error while teenager (doesn't mean they didn't).

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    39. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nerd.

    40. Re:But i thought... by caluml · · Score: 1

      OK then - explain how the "Rrr"s can give it away

    41. Re:But i thought... by SuperSlug · · Score: 1

      Watch this, it should explain how to tell the difference.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQiMS2zkjjc

      --
      The information wants to be free, I just give it somewhere to go.
    42. Re:But i thought... by SuperSlug · · Score: 1

      Here a geography lesson to help.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-ZvAVcBIrQ&NR=1

      --
      The information wants to be free, I just give it somewhere to go.
    43. Re:But i thought... by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      but then we are left with 3. Rare law abiding citizens and 4. People who confuse 2 with 4.

    44. Re:But i thought... by banffbug · · Score: 1

      simply, yes, you are right. However, for discussion purposes, a bit short of a response.

    45. Re:But i thought... by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      No, you are correct. Canada has the second largest proven oil reserves in the world, as well as 20% of the fresh water. As the middle east burns, and aquifers in the US dry up, the invasion and occupation of Canada is a virtual certainty. It would take a few months of propaganda to get everyone worked up and then just a few days to defeat the military, which is tiny. Canada has no nuclear weapons, so it will be a 'cakewalk'. This is not a moral question it is a question of resources and survival. If it were a moral question I should point out that Canadians believe in abortion, many of them are not even Christians, they have a socialist government and trade with Cuba. There are also hundreds of thousands of Muslims living in Canada, which is a threat to the security of American. They club baby seals to death too. And did I mention that they have lots of oil? See "Canadian Bacon" if you need any more proof.

    46. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't head of Kathy Reichs Books...? Murder and manslaughter on a daily basis ;-)

    47. Re:But i thought... by g-san · · Score: 1

      If they say Rrrrr they are a pirate, else they are Canadian.

    48. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See "Canadian Bacon" if you need any more proof.

      Ah ha, you mean bio diesel. I see where you are going with this! Between the baby seals and the bacon Canada will soon have enough fat to be energy independent. Just brilliant!

    49. Re:But i thought... by Sentry21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry. Once Phase One is complete and your economy has crashed, we'll start Phase Two. Once we've bought up your economy and banks, your chance to be Canada's fourth territory will commence.

    50. Re:But i thought... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      No problem, they can make the work, and assign the copyright to someone else, say a friend, a spouse, or a trust.

      Let the spouse or (friend) earn the proceeds, so legally they do not belong to the person.

      Of course, they will have a separate agreement with the person to pay them at various times, but they could confound the situation, for example, by taking part in other business with the person, such that it would not be clear for which transaction is causing their friend to be paying them this $$$.

      Especially if the friend is not keeping records; this is cash changing hands, at times and amounts chosen by the recipient, pursuant to what their friend understands their wishes to be.

    51. Re:But i thought... by Skrapion · · Score: 1

      Well, if you catch anybody saying "Rrroll up the rrrim to win", there's a good chance they're Canadian.

      Actually, I'm Canadian, and I can't hear a difference between Canadian and US accents, but people from the US tell me otherwise. I was in a diner in New Jersey and the waitress said "Wow, you have a really thick Canadian accent." Even worse, I knew a girl from Texas and she laughed whenever she heard me say "about".

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    52. Re:But i thought... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I believe the problem word here is "legitimate"... If one has that large of a gap in judgement, most "legitimate" employers won't hire you. And that's the way it should be.

      I believe the key word here is has that large a gap in judgement, and not had a large gap in judgement.

      And most "legitimate" employers won't hire. (But not all)

      I'm sure he wouldn't have been advertising to every prospective employer/client that he was mafiaboy; although, depending on applicable laws, he might have had to disclose his past record when applying for the job.

      The nickname may have been well-known at one time, but the real name certainly isn't, now, at least not until he wrote a book.

      When a company is hiring a security consulting firm -- I don't think "Do you have mafiaboy or any well-known hackers with a serious 'judgement lapse' on-staff?" is a common question.

    53. Re:But i thought... by Zenix · · Score: 1

      Catch me if you can...

    54. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John McCain, is that you???

    55. Re:But i thought... by Splab · · Score: 1

      no no no no NO, never regret, personally I've screwed up more than I care to count, but those screw ups let to the person I am today; wouldn't have it any other ways.

      (oh on a side note, any one else done stupid stuff as 15 years old that would get you caught up in the anti terror laws today?)

    56. Re:But i thought... by aqk · · Score: 1

      I say we HANG this "Mafiaboy"!

      It's the only proper thing to do- his life is fucked anyhow- at least in the USA, where they still occasionally hang children.

          So the kid was 15? NO EXCUSE!

          If he cannot be hanged in Canada, then a special posse of /.ers, US marines and Texas Rangers should sneak into Canada and "extradite" him.

      The li'l punk will be given short shrift in the glorious LAND OF THE FREE, I promise you!

          It's the American way! The ONLY way!

    57. Re:But i thought... by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I can't tell if you are being ironic or are just some kind of maniac. He shut down some web sites. No one died. Thank-you for your thoughtful comments!

  2. WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bought this book, but it intentionally contained too many pages and overflowed my bookcase. It fell off the end, and gave my cat a fatal error. While I was in the back garden burying Muffins, he sneaked into my house and stole all my stuff!

    1. Re:WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was the best reply to post ever!

    2. Re:WARNING! by YttriumOxide · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bought this book, but it intentionally contained too many pages and overflowed my bookcase. It fell off the end, and gave my cat a fatal error. While I was in the back garden burying Muffins, he sneaked into my house and stole all my stuff!

      It took me three readings of that to parse that "Muffins" was the name of your cat. My first impression of your post was a lot more surreal.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    3. Re:WARNING! by LizardKing · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Are you awake dear? I feel the need to bury my muffins".

    4. Re:WARNING! by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sigh. "Can we do it here? I'm not doing it in the damn garden again."

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    5. Re:WARNING! by gacl · · Score: 1

      I wondered why he was "buying Muffins" in his garden. And i though that "Muffins" was capitalized because he might be German.

    6. Re:WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. Are they wild oat muffins?

  3. Fix typo please by toxygen01 · · Score: 1

    "Today he he works". It happens from time to time

  4. "Yahooo"? Spellcheck, Taco. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    Headline at the moment is "Yahooo Hacker 'Mafiaboy' Eight Years On Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Oct 13, '08 09:15 PM"

    1. Re:"Yahooo"? Spellcheck, Taco. by not+already+in+use · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Phonetic spelling of the jingle, douche!

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
  5. What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like he paid for his crime...

    Oh wait. He is being paid for his crime?

    WTF

    1. Re:What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's got it totally figured out..

      1: Search for some lame script kiddy files
      2: Execute these files
      3: Take down high profile site.
      4: get arrested ...
      PROFIT!!!!

      I just shake my head.

  6. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys really need to bury this one, put away your 9/11 record.

    Not like its gone on for hundreds of years. One incident and its all over.

  7. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by kirbysuperstar · · Score: 0

    Sure. But.. what does that have to do with anything?

  8. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by speroni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you put it in perspective, Mafiaboy's exploits are pretty minor compared to the damage wrought by the reaction to the terrorism of 9/11.

    Is there a something similar to Godwin's law for 9/11? I don't really see the connection to this article here.

    --
    Eschew Obfuscation
  9. Words of Wisdom from a Script Kiddie by tecopa03 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh lord.

    Chapter two, "I installed the win32 exe called 'zombie', next I clicked on the Dee DOS button and took out CNN"

    1. Re:Words of Wisdom from a Script Kiddie by jackie_147 · · Score: 1

      b0w 2 1337h4x0r sk!lls

    2. Re:Words of Wisdom from a Script Kiddie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the name came up, I just remembered hearing about the script kid. His acquaintance gave it to him and told him never to use it. He used it anyway, and took out a few major websites. But he wasn't a hacker.

    3. Re:Words of Wisdom from a Script Kiddie by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      He was on the news the other day. Apparently he can't remain quiet about computer security anymore. He mentioned that online banking seemed "crazy" to him.

    4. Re:Words of Wisdom from a Script Kiddie by tecopa03 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Of course he's going to say that. He's now going to live off of FUD (fear uncertainty and doubt).

      He's a kiddie, and will always be a kiddie. And his opinion is just that.

  10. Once again by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Proof that crime really *does* pay.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Once again by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, crime does pay... until you get caught. And according to the US justice and political system, if you have made the right friends and spent some of your money in the right places (campaigns) then even if you do get caught, crime continues to pay. Just remember to forget how many houses you have.

      Yeah, go ahead, mark this troll, but it's true.

    2. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, go ahead, mark this troll.

      Ok.

    3. Re:Once again by ForestDemon · · Score: 1

      LOL, buddy you hit that right on the head.

      --
      Happiness is a belt fed weapon...
    4. Re:Once again by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, no, nothing is illegal or a crime until you get caught. Until then it is an enterprising career. But when you do get caught it's still not a crime until you are arrested for it, unless of course it's just about sex then it's ok.

      Don't worry baby I promise I won't cum in your mouth. Oops sorry here have a cigar it will take the bad taste in your mouth.

  11. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every time I fly, I am reminded just how much we lost in the years following that day.

  12. Books by crooks by philmck · · Score: 1

    Do people here feel comfortable buying books by crooks?

    --
    Phil McKerracher
    1. Re:Books by crooks by Coldness · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it does have a nice rhyme to it..

    2. Re:Books by crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. People here will torrent it.

    3. Re:Books by crooks by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Perhaps.

      I'm more interested in how comfortable people are hiring crooks as security consultants.

    4. Re:Books by crooks by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Would you, could you, buy this book,
      Aware the author is a crook?
      I would not buy this cracker's sham,
      I do not like it, Sam I Am!

      (apologies to the great Dr Seuss :P)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    5. Re:Books by crooks by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      And you have NEVER broken the law. I assume you live in a cave and eat bugs for a living.

    6. Re:Books by crooks by perlchild · · Score: 1

      I do feel comfortable(but I won't buy it... saving on dead trees at the moment), but on the other hand, just because I buy the book, doesn't mean I feel obligated to believe what's in it...

    7. Re:Books by crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to read it, I don't need to buy it. I can just go to the library and read it, and have a laugh.

    8. Re:Books by crooks by Skrapion · · Score: 1
      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    9. Re:Books by crooks by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that's sad. This guy is a hero. But he is also a "drug criminal" and therefore MUST PURSUED AND DESTROYED. He probably didn't pay his income tax either.

    10. Re:Books by crooks by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Isn't that illegal?

    11. Re:Books by crooks by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Well they could always hire nuns.

    12. Re:Books by crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ffsd dasfa sasfasd asdfsadsda adsffdfsdafsdafdsfa dfsafs

  13. Why? by I.M.O.G. · · Score: 1

    I don't see what makes him any more insightful in this area, aside from some ancient history. Looking at the domain mafiaboy.com I wouldn't expect much of anything from this book.

    As for advising the masses in how to stay safe, the rules are so basic for everyday users that I doubt a security consultant could offer anything considerably insightful:

    1) Don't run files whose source you don't trust
    2) Read prompts before clicking yes, default answer should be no unless you specifically understand what it's talking about
    3) Don't provide personal/financial information to anyone but highly reputable vendors/establishments
    4) Avoid going to domains you aren't familiar with, as they could contain exploits which can bot your machine without any interaction - stick to reputable sources of information
    5) Keep your AV and Firewall up to date
    6) Ask your techie friend/relative about switching to Linux, and you can almost completely cross 1, 4, and 5 off this list

    1. Re:Why? by onion2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      6) Ask your techie friend/relative about switching to Linux, and you can almost completely cross 1, 4, and 5 off this list

      Err... no. Assuming you're running Linux (or OSX, BSD, whatever) 1, 4 and 5 still apply just as much as they do on Windows.

      1) Don't run files whose source you don't trust

      Binaries can be dangerous on Linux, especially if you're a newbie user who runs things as root (and we are talking about newbies here remember). Even compiling your own apps can be dangerous if the source of the source isn't trustworthy.

      4) Avoid going to domains you aren't familiar with, as they could contain exploits which can bot your machine without any interaction - stick to reputable sources of information

      You're not going to be running into self-installing ActiveX malware, but you're in just as much danger from phishing, XSS or browser exploit hacks.

      5) Keep your AV and Firewall up to date

      The firewall issue is obvious. You need one even on a Linux PC. Maybe moreso even because Linux often comes with a raft of server and daemon stuff that Windows doesn't. AV is more contentious - but if you're using the computer for anything important, eg work related, and you don't want to pass viruses on to clients then AV is still a useful tool. I'm certain that me passing on a virus to a client would do more damage to my business than actually having my computer affected by one itself.

      Your operating system is never enough for you to take a liaise faire attitude to security regardless of what you're running.

    2. Re:Why? by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      4) Avoid going to domains you aren't familiar with, as they could contain exploits which can bot your machine without any interaction - stick to reputable sources of information

      How would one realistically do that? Since I wouldn't dare claim I knew every place on the net that I'll ever need, how can you go to only trusted domains when searching for information?

    3. Re:Why? by houghi · · Score: 1

      6) Ask your techie friend/relative about switching to Linux, and you can almost completely cross 1, 4, and 5 off this list

      http://xkcd.com/456/

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Why? by I.M.O.G. · · Score: 1

      Agreed to a point, however your extending my stance beyond where I intended it to reach. "Almost" is a big operative word here. Here are my reasonings for my statement, in hopes it may make more sense. In no way was my statement meant to say you can forget about security altogether, and I stand by it being accurate. 1) There's a completely different paradigm to Linux than there is to Windows. If your using Linux correctly as a newbie user, your installing apps from repository and they are all approved apps. Installing apps from anywhere on the net or running as root are invalid assumptions for this. I say it almost can be forgotten, because in comparison to Windows being thoughtless about your PC usage in this regard is a lot safer in Linux. 4) ActiveX exploits are a huge area of web security to cross off your vulnerability list. One of my other statements was also about being cautious about where you enter personal/financial information - This addresses XSS and browser exploits to a point. If you aren't entering and storing personal data, then XSS and browser exploits are going to be low impact. In contrast to Windows, drive-by exploits are less likely to expose your personal info using a browser on Linux than they are on Windows - an activex script isn't going to own your box. Again, in comparison you can almost forget about it. 6) AV software on a Linux client is a bad idea, and those using it are silly for doing so. If your worried about passing a virus onto a client you should address that in your mail infrastructure, or ensure your using a mail service which handles that for you. Trying to do it yourself on the client is poor design, and the software options for this are lousy at best. I think that's very clear. Software firewall's are garbage also, their only purpose is to prevent things from phoning out - if you aren't running as root, you are installing trusted software from repository, then there's little benefit in wasting resources on a software firewall. Ensure you have a good hardware firewall that your behind on your network, and if you have any reason to be suspicious about traffic on your PC - the netstat tool is simple, unobtrusive, and gives you an accurate idea of what communication is coming into and going out of your PC. AV and software Firewalls have no real place on a Linux client - you can almost forget about them entirely. If you want to stretch it, you can install a software firewall but you'll likely never reap any benefit from it.

    5. Re:Why? by I.M.O.G. · · Score: 1

      The same way you would do so at the library?

      Find a reputable primary source, then follow sources that they cite. For example, if your doing research start with a reputable journal such as the Harvard Business Review, then refer to sources they cite for further detail. More generically, start at CNN.com or wikipedia or some other "large brand" of website, and use it for direction before clicking on any link that comes off google.

      By no means a full proof or robust approach, but its a good start. This assumes an awareness that going to random sites bears some inherent risk, and you should build familiarity with good sources of information over time, as well as becoming familiar with where the pitfalls are.

    6. Re:Why? by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      It's easy just stick to Yahoo! LOL

    7. Re:Why? by cloakable · · Score: 1

      Maybe moreso even because Linux often comes with a raft of server and daemon stuff that Windows doesn't.

      Um, while pretty much all distros have a raft of daemons available, I'd highly recommend you don't install one that installs and starts them on a desktop install. Unless you tell it to, of course. Debian policy is no network listening services on a base install, and that's a good one, IMO.

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newbies also seem to have no problem at all just copying several lines and entering them at the command line. I guess there is a reason why the Ubuntu Forums FAQ points to a thread that starts with: ATTENTION ALL USERS: Malicious Commands

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The firewall issue is obvious. You need one even on a Linux PC. Maybe moreso even because Linux often comes with a raft of server and daemon stuff that Windows doesn't

      just don't run all those services in the first place !

  14. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by physicsphairy · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    We can maintain generality by assuming that Hitler caused 9/11.

    What's "Osama" hiding underneath that beard, anyway?

  15. Not worth the time by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The excerpt reads like a pre-teen love story.

    I downloaded and then I pressed enter
    I installed and then I was online

    And thats chapter 5, what the hell does he write about (being all of 9 years old) for the first 4 chapters?

    This won't qualify as proper fish wrapping.

    1. Re:Not worth the time by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I guess, not surprisingly, he was just a script kiddie - he downloaded hacks and ran them and thought he was a cool 133t h4x0r.

      Doesn't say much for Yahoo if they hadn't protected themselves from known exploits, although I assume they learnt from the lesson.

  16. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there's no literal connection...

  17. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I belive its called Giuliani's rule

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  18. What I always wanted to ask... by information_retrieva · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always want to ask one of these reformed hackers what, if anything, would have deterred them when they were first getting started. Does anyone know if this book attempts to answer that sort of question?

    1. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, assuming you posed the question to me (I was convicted of telephone fraud (phreaking) once, and discharged without conviction on charges of breaches of the telecommunications act (unlawful entry to a computer system that wasn't my own (a bank))), I would have to answer as follows:

      There is almost nothing you could have done to deter me from those actions. I felt as if I was a part of a "wild frontier", and had control and abilities that very few others possessed (and, I was probably right). The feeling was that of real power - something that most people in their very early teens (when I was arrested for the crimes mentioned) don't often get a lot of... especially as the "geeky kid" at school who got picked on all the time (this was the early 90s in small town New Zealand - not the best place for a geek). Trying to convince anyone to willingly give up that sense of "worth" without getting something equal in return is pretty much impossible.
      It's also worth noting that I was caught twice, for what was hundreds, if not thousands, of criminal activities. I still felt pretty bulletproof (especially after the "discharge without conviction" for the bank crack)

      I made my mistakes, but honestly, I don't regret it even to this day - my current work has nothing to do with security, although I still keep up in those circles and like to hone my skills against my own systems. But, I've also never had any negative consequences other than the court imposed penalty for the phreaking (which was surprisingly minor - especially in relation to the police recommendation). If a kid were to come to me today and ask if he/she should do it, my answer would be that they should do what they feel is right and accept the consequences if they do something illegal and get caught at it. I'm not 100% sure that even means I would try to discourage them...

      Of course, I was a cracker and a phreaker... not a script kiddie. "Mafiaboy" may be a little different.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    2. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by timholman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I felt as if I was a part of a "wild frontier", and had control and abilities that very few others possessed (and, I was probably right).

      No, actually you were wrong. There are many, many bright people who have the ability to do what you did - far more than you realize. The difference was that they had something that you lacked - the moral judgment not to go breaking into other people's systems, and instead to do something productive with their abilities.

      It's like a bunch of teenaged burglars thinking they're "special" because they can do something their peers don't do - break into houses and steal the belongings. But the truth is that almost anyone can become a burglar, provided they choose to do so. It's just that most people make better choices with their lives.

    3. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are many, many bright people who have the ability to do what you did - far more than you realize.

      Hmmm... as I mentioned, I lived in small town New Zealand, and it was the early 90s. I really don't think there were too many other people around with the same skills that I had. Now, you then said:

      But the truth is that almost anyone can become a burglar, provided they choose to do so (emphasis mine)

      I never said others couldn't BECOME able to do what I did, simply that very few others actually possessed the required skills. In the early 90s, computer crime wasn't the "cool" thing that it had become after the web explosion in the mid to late 90s. It wasn't unheard of, and was gaining popularity (see movies such as War Games from nearly 10 years earlier), however it was still pretty quiet in general. Compounded with my location, I can be pretty certain I knew everyone locally who could do such things - and that wasn't exactly a lot of people.

      The difference was that they had something that you lacked - the moral judgment not to go breaking into other people's systems, and instead to do something productive with their abilities.

      That is perhaps true - there may well have been others who COULD do it, but didn't, but I think that's pretty unlikely (especially if we're limiting the sample set to people my age at the time), as the only real way to gain those skills was to either actually do it, or study it specifically. Why anyone would study it without doing it, as a young teenager, I couldn't imagine.

      Note that I never said "noone", I said "very few", and as a percentage of the population of Earth, I'm pretty positive that stands as true. As a percentage of people my age, or people in my town, I'm completely certain.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    4. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I used to be a naughty boy in my youth and early twenties. I sometimes discuss my criminal exploits during those late night wine drinking sessions, often with family, sometimes with an ex-copper who always offers some great insight.

      "You never get caught the first time"

      If people got caught the first time, we'd live in an almost crime free world. The risk of getting caught would be 100% and only crimes of desperation would be undertaken.

      So, not wanting to get too deep, and just wanted to answer your question, a risk of getting caught would have been a decent deterrent.

      Inda (never caught)

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by banffbug · · Score: 1

      thx for sharing!

    6. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by corbettw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is almost nothing you could have done to deter me from those actions. I felt as if I was a part of a "wild frontier", and had control and abilities that very few others possessed (and, I was probably right). The feeling was that of real power - something that most people in their very early teens (when I was arrested for the crimes mentioned) don't often get a lot of... especially as the "geeky kid" at school who got picked on all the time (this was the early 90s in small town New Zealand - not the best place for a geek). Trying to convince anyone to willingly give up that sense of "worth" without getting something equal in return is pretty much impossible.

      To distill down your stated motivations, you were seeking power and a form of acceptance. Not much different from most young criminals, really. And the same thing could've motivated you not to do it as does motivate them: friends who value you without requiring that you break laws.

      This is why it's so important to get young kids involved in after school activities and clubs. Sure, you might not have been interested in joining a youth soccer league, but what about a chess club? Or a gaming group? Basically, anywhere where you can make friends (in real life) and get positive feedback and acceptance. If you had had those, would you still have felt the need to break into banks?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're suggesting that is so called lack of moral judgment is not implicitly a skill/ability. Judging by how often people do morally questionable things that lead to their eventual success, I would beg to differ.

    8. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was young nothing would have prevented me from breaking into computer systems.

      I broke into systems because I wanted to use to learn. Not commit crimes. I wanted to be able to write my own exploits so that sparked my interest in programming. I wouldn't change that for anything.

      Mafiaboy was a joke then and he's still a joke. It takes no skill to do what he did.

    9. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To distill down your stated motivations, you were seeking power and a form of acceptance.

      Primarily the former rather than the latter... you can't really have "power" (over people) without at least some kind of acceptance, but the acceptance was definitely a secondary thing to the power. It's a pretty natural human desire to have power over others, and the school bullies would assert theirs physically, while the "general geeks" would sit back and know that they'd be asserting theirs later in life. For me, it wasn't really enough. It's not that I wanted/needed/deserved more power than anyone else, it's just that one day I found a means that gave me a more ultimate kind of power - power over the "almighty" adults. At that age, I had the typical rebellious streak of the younger teenage years, and I had found an outlet for it.

      Sure, you might not have been interested in joining a youth soccer league, but what about a chess club? Or a gaming group? Basically, anywhere where you can make friends (in real life) and get positive feedback and acceptance. If you had had those, would you still have felt the need to break into banks?

      I was in the chess club, maths competition team, and on the school newspaper (I became editor of it eventually)... none really did anything to stop me wanting to break in to banks. If you compare them, "broke in to bank" is a hell of a lot "cooler" at that age than "first prize in maths competition", "wrote well appreciated article" or "considered by peers to be really good at chess".

      The school staff (teachers, guidance counsellor, principal etc) worshipped the ground I walked on - I could do no wrong in their eyes. My peers (geeks) respected me and looked up to me (head of that 'clique' basically), but that wasn't enough. I viewed the school staff as incompetent and unaware (how could they write reports saying "studies hard", when I didn't study a day in my life?) and my peers as slimy and greasing ("they just want to be me" (I almost certainly misconstrued their intentions - I was a cynical little bastard really)). I didn't just want to be respected - I wanted to be ADMIRED, FEARED and LOVED.
      (again, PLEASE remember this is how I thought at that age - I've grown up now, and I do realise how petty and crappy those attitudes are... but I also think they're pretty common amongst people at that age)

      Honestly, another factor in how I viewed the activity (rather than the reasons for it) may have been my upbringing. I was raised to question authority when that authority was not backed up with reason. So, the idea of "breaking a law" didn't have a huge negative stigma attached to it for me. I knew it was wrong in the eyes of the law, but I considered (and still consider to be quite honest) those who uphold the law with no regard for the reasons behind it to be very foolish indeed - nothing more than sheep to the system. Whenever my parents told me to do something, they'd ALWAYS give me a reason why. Teachers at school were happy to do the same as long as I was polite about it, which I always was ("Go take this to Mr Smith", "Why?", "Because he needs it, and you can miss a few minutes of class without falling behind", "Okay").
      Breaking in to a bank just didn't feel wrong to me. I didn't steal money, I didn't harm anyone, I just looked around. Remember, from the eyes of a young teen, this is a pretty straightforward kind of argument - you don't really appreciate the many facets of things like that until you're much older. It's a matter of maturity, and while I certainly may have been a very smart kid, I was definitely NOT mature enough to really handle my knowledge.

      Just as a side note - it eventually led me to a rather difficult point in my life in my late teenage years, where I was arrested, hired an extremely good lawyer, got off with only a fine, paid that, found out the lawyer was charging me more than three times what the fine was, cracked in to her system to ma

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    10. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, I was a cracker and a phreaker... not a script kiddie. "Mafiaboy" may be a little different.

      hahaha.. probably Mafiaboy don't describe himself as a script kiddie...

    11. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      This is why it's so important to get young kids involved in after school activities and clubs.

      Careful though. My parents forced me to join every club and sport possible, so I had 0 freetime. By the time I hit senior year I was so burned out from all that garbage I didn't go to college. And still haven't. And life now sucks.

    12. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, I was a cracker and a phreaker... not a script kiddie. "Mafiaboy" may be a little different.

      Oh please. Your self-impressed 'I used to be somebody' speech sounds so much better coming from someone who actually did something to be proud of.

      If you were any good at it you wouldn't have gotten caught.

    13. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can answer that question - nothing. If you take together "pirating", hacking and phreaking, that was a huge component of what BBS culture in the 1980s was. My little Commodore 64 could connect to a mainframe on the Internet or x.25 network, and it would be a huge boost in capability and speed (outside of the 1200 baud connection the mainframe).

      I don't think prosecution could have ever stopped hacking. There is a certain nationalist insurgency/rebellion/terrorist movement that I know the history of fairly well. When it started out, it was a couple of guys with rifles. By the time it ended, it had become much, much more sophisticated, capable of striking at the most sensitive targets of the occupying country. I'm not talking about China, but it concurs to some extent with Mao's theory of guerrilla warfare, or even Che Guevara's. By the mid 1990s, hackers were becoming increasingly sophisticated and organized, and I don't think prosecution would have affected things at all, just like prosecution has done little to get rid of the mafia in the US.

      What ended it was money. The stick wasn't working, so the carrot came out. Suddenly all the hackers I knew started working for companies in 1994 (or 1995) and making salaries over $50,000 a year. By 1997, I was making over $50,000 a year as well. One guy who was in our crowd now has a worth in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Others did very well in stock options, or at least have cushy six-figure jobs. I didn't go into the security field, although many did.

      I remember watching George Soros talk to Charlie Rose on TV. Soros said one of the main lessons of his life was living in Hungary during the Nazi occupation. His father and him broke the laws that existed regarding Jewish registration and all of that, and thus survived. Those who followed the rules and obeyed the authorities mostly perished. That breaking the rules meant survival for him, and following them would have probably meant death had a profound effect on him, he said.

    14. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      There is only one thing that deters anyone from doing anything and that is the certainty, or near certainty of punishment. If I run at the wall head down, I will be punished for sure, so I don't that. If I smoke I may get away with it, not everyone who smokes dies or gets sick as a result. This is what most people miss about punishment, they think it's the degree and punishment, when it's the likelihood of punishment that counts. No one would smoke if 80% of them died in 30 minutes.

    15. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      There is almost nothing you could have done to deter me from those actions. I felt as if I was a part of a "wild frontier", and had control and abilities that very few others possessed (and, I was probably right). The feeling was that of real power - something that most people in their very early teens (when I was arrested for the crimes mentioned) don't often get a lot of... especially as the "geeky kid" at school who got picked on all the time (this was the early 90s in small town New Zealand - not the best place for a geek). Trying to convince anyone to willingly give up that sense of "worth" without getting something equal in return is pretty much impossible.

      [Makes note to teach kids to shoot and take them hunting regularly.]

    16. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Eythian · · Score: 1

      and my peers as slimy and greasing ("they just want to be me" (I almost certainly misconstrued their intentions - I was a cynical little bastard really))

      *cough* 'almost'?! :)

    17. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Hah... I was wondering if you'd read all that ;) Ah the perils of the people I'm talking about having Slashdot accounts!

      But hey, to be completely honest, maybe I was RIGHT when I was a "cynical little bastard" and I've just become wrong in my old age... one can never really KNOW, can one?

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    18. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear that life sucks, but if I were you, I wouldn't attribute it entirely to "not going to college". As a result of the way my life went after the activities that I described in this thread, I also never went to any kind of "higher education" (actually, a started a Polytechnic course, but got expelled for fixing a bug in a tutor's program that was in a folder I shouldn't have had access to), and my life has turned out pretty well.

      My advice, if you're finding it hard to get work based on your lack of education is to work for yourself for awhile. Listing my own security company on my CV did much more for me when I decided to work for someone else than educational background ever could have. I'm now reasonably well paid and working as a programmer in a relatively senior position for a company that treats me pretty well. And I'm not quite yet 30 - so I doubt I'd be much further had I spent 4 or so years of my life getting a bit of paper.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    19. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      My advice, if you're finding it hard to get work based on your lack of education is to work for yourself for awhile.

      That, and volunteer with non-profits. They're usually not as picky about background and education as paying employers/clients. And once you've proved yourself to the board of that non-profit, they should be able to refer to paying gigs and a real job.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    20. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      So really your problem was more about a lack of morals and (possibly) empathy than anything else. It sounds like you've learned some over the years, so that's good. But this is an example of why it's a bad idea to teach young kids to always question authority: they don't have enough experience yet to know when to question things, and what questions to ask in the first place.

      Questioning authority is something you should learn after high school, when you're old enough to also understand the consequences of your actions. It's unfair to a 15 year old to expect them to operate at the same level as a 25 year old.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    21. Re:What I always wanted to ask... by Eythian · · Score: 1

      But hey, to be completely honest, maybe I was RIGHT when I was a "cynical little bastard" and I've just become wrong in my old age... one can never really KNOW, can one?

      I like to think I know. Even if it was long enough ago that my memory is sorta hazy :)

  19. excerpts.... by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Insightful
    from the except http://mafiaboybook.com/about-the-book/ from the book...

    "I had heard you could download versions of even the most popular games for free. This was a type of "warez"--pirated software."

    "I realized it was a common occurrence and that it was called punting. Someone knocked me offline by hitting me with so much data that my connection was severed. These punters seemed to have a huge amount of power over others on AOL."

    "I wanted to punt someone. Badly. That's when my real hunt for AOL hacking tools started."

    "I slowly learned how things worked. I eventually began to modify the applications to meet my needs. This is how kiddies become hackers."

    Jesus H Christ! People buy this crap?

    One thing is for certain, the target audience is not to be found on /., though I predict we will all get a good laugh off it.

    1. Re:excerpts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appeals to mass audience.
      What would be "Hackers"(the film) be abotu if it was realistic? Think about it.
      No what if we sprinkle some realism that would be a "hacker book".But its still creative fiction.

  20. Script kiddie by LizardKing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Frankly, I'm not surprised that a script kiddie (which is all Mafia boy was) could take Yahoo! down back in 2000. I worked there in 1999 for four or five months, and left in disgust at how poor their engineering was. On my first day I fixed a bug where user input was being used as a format string. This in C code that was written by a "veteran" coder, who clearly couldn't write anything maintainable. There was no documentation (I'm not exaggerating), designs were communicate verbally, hacked together and then forgotten. There was not project management as such, and no middle management - seniority was based simply on who had been there the longest. While this "hacker ethos", of which Yahoo! employees were inordinately proud, may have worked when it was two guys working from a trailer but it was disastrous in a large, international development team.

    1. Re:Script kiddie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be happy to know that things haven't changed all that much since you left then...

      I too left last year in disgust

    2. Re:Script kiddie by bipbop · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's funny. I worked there for almost the entire span mentioned between parent and grandparent, and I wouldn't say they haven't changed. I'd say they've changed a lot, for the worse ;-)

  21. ...and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and he's still an ego jerk :p

  22. Start of the script kiddy revolution by hkb · · Score: 4, Informative

    It should be noted by those of us who still vividly remember, that Mafiaboy and YTcracker were relatively skill-less script kiddies, not hackers. Back then, at least.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    1. Re:Start of the script kiddy revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be noted by those of us who still vividly remember, that Mafiaboy and YTcracker were relatively skill-less script kiddies, not hackers. Back then, at least.

      ^^ yea, from what we could tell, the scripts that were used were being used by everyone at the time.

  23. Deterence... by way2trivial · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    There is almost nothing you could have done to deter me from those actions.

    What if the month before a vigilante group of Yahoo fanpunks had made Michael Calce swallow his own testicles and released the video on You Tube?

    would you still have been as willing to phreak then?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Deterence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus the 'almost nothing' ...

    2. Re:Deterence... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Well no, but I did say "almost nothing"...
      Besides - YouTube didn't exist in the early 90s when I was doing that sort of thing.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    3. Re:Deterence... by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Please don't post your sexual fantasies here, try the nambla forum...

  24. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What's "Osama" hiding underneath that beard, anyway?

    A little square moustache! The secret is out!

  25. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should remember the people you kill in Irak and middle-east. They're much more than 3,000 US citizens... Not trolling, just saying the truth.

  26. Why did I go to college? by penguin_dance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While the rest of us were going to college, this guy had the formula to quick success.

    Hack into large company web sites
    Get a slap on the wrist
    Become a reformed hacker/security expert
    Write book on exploits
    $PROFIT!

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    1. Re:Why did I go to college? by ITJC68 · · Score: 1

      I bet if you polled the majority of employees at Symantec, Mcaffee and other antivirus program makers you would find more of these types. Remember the saying "keep your friends close and enemies even closer".

    2. Re:Why did I go to college? by dirtyangus · · Score: 1

      He never hacked into any large company web sites.

    3. Re:Why did I go to college? by Zephyrmation · · Score: 1

      Because you didnt have the 1337 skills to hack into large company sites. sorry, but it's true. and it's not flamebait, because I have a point - if I had had the time and interest required to hack web sites, I probably would have done that. but I didn't, just like the other 99.9% of people out there.

      The rules for publishing books are quite simple: if the publisher thinks it can make money off of it, then you'll get published. Crazy shit sells. If you really want to sell a book, go out there and do some crazy shit. How many books do you think are being written about OJ Simpson right now?

    4. Re:Why did I go to college? by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Actually...it was probably more because the personal computer didn't really come on the scene until after I was an adult and the internet as it's known today much later. I may not have had the '1337 skills' (and most people who say they are '1337' in anything usually aren't.) But I would have had the interest and the time to see what I could get into. I'm still interested in security issues although from a different viewpoint. I find computer forensics fascinating.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    5. Re:Why did I go to college? by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it only took 8 years. What a genius.

  27. Felony or Marketing? by MrMarket · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many 15 yr olds see high-profile hacking felonies as their golden ticket into the "legitimate security consultant," career path? Is this the best way to get street cred as a consultant?

    1. Re:Felony or Marketing? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Well it's certainly better than DeVry!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  28. 8 years later... by AioKits · · Score: 1

    Does this now make him, Mafiaman?

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:8 years later... by whoppo · · Score: 1

      Does this now make him, Mafiaman?

      No.. he has been, and always will be "MafiaBitch" a whiny little brat who downloaded someone else's work to DoS some other whiny little brats.. and then he simply found bigger targets.. and now he's a fscking celebrity. I suppose that if I had been busted for shoplifting that Snickers (tm) bar when I was 15 years old, I could have turned that into a lucrative career in physical retail security and written a book... perhaps I could have titled it "Snatching Snacks" (followed by the pr0n version: "Snacking Snatches")

      --
      chown -R us /base
    2. Re:8 years later... by AioKits · · Score: 1

      I will buy both if you publish!

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  29. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been on the wrong end of Mafiaboy's DDoS tantrums. It sickens me that he's employable as a 'security consultant'.

    Posted anonymously because I don't want to be targeted again by him.

  30. How sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAfiaBoy, the epitome of the "script kiddie" cashing in on his notoriety.

  31. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people have I killed in Iraq? I wasn't aware I had ever been there. Figured I'd remember something like that... must have been the martinis...

  32. From script kiddie to security expert? by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    How exactly does the transformation from a script kiddie to a security EXPERT happen?

    A book on that, I'd pay to read. I'm a sucker for case sturies on business mistakes.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  33. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key word being reaction. All the actual event did was take out a tower and kill people equivalent to less than a week of cancer.

  34. Script Kiddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't he just a script kiddy that got caught doing what script kiddies do best? Or has my memory failed me?
    And if my fist statement is correct, how the hell would that make an interesting read lol!

  35. NOT a hacker by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    He was a script kiddy, not a hacker. That's about it. And no, he's not any better today.

  36. The standard security career path by moxley · · Score: 1

    It seems like that is the way to have a good career in IT security - either get arrested for "cyber crime" or carry out famous (or infamous) exploits in your younger years and then reform or be released and get paid to do exactly the same thing on behalf of corporations.

    It makes sense. You can't learn this stuff by reading books, you need real world situations to hone your skills.

    It is interesting that illegal acts committed in your teens can lead to a good "legitimate" job in the same area. If it worked that way for all teenage unlawful behavior I'd probably be head of Sandoz Pharmaceuticals instead of an IT director.

  37. I've seen him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually know where Mafiaboy lives in Montreal and seen him a few times. Judging from the house he's living in (along with the neighbourhood) he's loaded. This is 2-3 years after his DDOS stunt. His father drives a Porsche if I'm not mistaken, and is a well-connected business-man who knows some top lawyers.

    He's a fucking script kiddie, not a hacker.

  38. I'd love to give a commencement address... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I was always a nice guy, and used my intellectual superpowers for the greater good.

    What a sucker I was. I should have turned to crime, taken my lumps, and then profited from tales of my crimes.

    Remember, boys and girls, everything your parents and teachers tell you about good behavior is wrong.

    The good guys watch their retirement investments get raped bloody.

    The bullies and bad guys get pardoned and bailed out with golden parachutes.

    Welcome to the steaming mountain of rat shit we call civilization, kiddo.

  39. Re:7 years ago two planes flew into the Twin Tower by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I belive its called Giuliani's rule

    Wow. I can say I was there when a new major meme was minted.

    Seriously, let's get this one spread.

  40. What about Coolio? by bobdylan · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there another 'hacker' who went by Coolio who was arrested around the time MafiaBoy did his thing? I remember reading an article where he was pictured in a Pokemon shirt being led in for questioning. It was full of win.

    1. Re:What about Coolio? by rilian4 · · Score: 1
      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
  41. Well... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Do people here feel comfortable buying books by crooks?

    It does seem less risky than electing them.

  42. and he was on The Hour recently, too.... by atomic+brainslide · · Score: 1

    here's an interview of mafiaboy on a Canadian tv programme called The Hour.

    cheers

    --
    check out my comic: Essential Tremors
  43. wannabe hacker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    guy fucken loser and wannabe hax0r.

  44. Get caught, grow up, write - been done before. by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

    Who else here remembers Bill Landreth's book?

    Not that I don't believe this should be written about... quite the opposite, actually, as the technology and surrounding social and technological environment had changed quite a bit in the intervening decades.

  45. Mafiaboy on CBC radio tomorrow (oct 14, 08) by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/logs.html He'll be on tomorrow 8:45 AM EST. If you can't get CBC on the radio or XM, the show will be podcast at the link above.

  46. Re:But i thought... not an Ironic Maniac! by aqk · · Score: 1

    Alas, it's worse than you assumed: I am an Ironic Maniac (or perhaps a Manic Ironyman... Mwa-ha-ha-ha!)

    Sometimes I run through the streets with a hot Branding Irony, marking miscreant posters with a scarlet letter.

    No ones dies. And no websites are shut down. But they do gain new respect for irony!