RIAA Wants Its $222,000 Verdict Back
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The RIAA, unhappy with the Court's decision setting aside its $222,000 jury verdict over $23.76 worth of song files, and throwing out the legal theory on which it was based, has made a motion for permission to file an appeal from the Judge's order, in Capitol v. Thomas. Normally, only final judgments are appealable, and appeals are not permissible in federal court from 'interlocutory' orders of that nature."
I hope the RIAA is McLovin' it.
I don't think this is a true story, but it's very creative.
Man, why is everyone always trying to be keeping a group of old, rich, litigious men down? They're just trying to make a few more hundred million dollars by screwing over the entire country, give them a break! I bet when YOU manage to get a monopoly stealing artist's rights, YOU'RE going to want to prosecute every teen who doesn't pay you a 200% markup!
... You'd think anybody with half a conscience would move on at this point.
What's your point?
HEY!
My dad's a lawyer and my mom's dead..... Oh.
They want them back.
That explains why "Umbrella Corporation" is on your birth certificate...
The RIAA's claim that it's all about compensating the artists is indeed true.
What they aren't saying is that it's all about compensating the con-artists. :)
Warning, parent is a troll.
umm, Depends...
Because NYCL submitted it.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
You'd think anybody with half a conscience would move on at this point.
See, you just answered your own question.
... well, really really bad things happen.
... well, now you know. It was a simple clerical error, really.
This particular batch of attorneys only came preloaded with a fifth of one standard conscience at the factory (50% is the normal setting.) Basically, if you're buying them in quantity, they come a lot cheaper that way: consciences are expensive items, after all. In practice, it's been found that if you install more conscience than that, they start exhibiting undesirable characteristics such as "honesty" and "business ethic". Not a good thing, if you're a soulless, money-grubbing oligopoly. If you don't buy any conscience at all
Most people don't know this, but some time ago a group of attorneys was ordered for special-purpose use in Congressional and major banking applications. Unfortunately, while the order specified a 75% conscience load, they were accidentally shipped without any. Company personnel colloquially refer to these jobs as the "Manson line" because they have all the personality traits of a typical advanced sociopath. Corporate hatchetmen are frequently M-series, for example.
If anyone was wondering what caused the recent worldwide financial crisis
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
How can you go on a rant about a piece of shit without telling us how many Courics it was? Was it bigger than Bono? Had Obama recently been to P.F. Changs?
You'd think people who post on a tech site would at least mention technical details. Sheesh.
So how much was the bill?
GET A BRAIN MORAN!
The joke goes: "The RIAA called. They want their $222,000 verdict back."
Wow thats over 100 MP3s
Give them time.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Actually, lawyers are barred from having sex with their clients. It's regarded as double-billing.
Yeah, that'll work.
Somebody mod parent down. It obviously wouldn't work.
"The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497