Slashdot Mirror


New Cellphone Sized "Computer" Takes Aim at Sub-Notebooks

IMOVIO has launched a new cellphone-sized computer that is aimed at something similar to the subnotebook market. While it doesn't have 3G of its own, it does have a QWERTY keyboard, Wi-Fi, and a $175 price point. "It can connect to the Internet using a standard Wi-Fi connection, or it can use your cell phone's mobile broadband connection via Bluetooth. The company is currently pitching it to mobile network operators and retail stores. It's being compared to the ill-fated Palm Foleo. But the comparison doesn't work because the Foleo was Palm-phone only, didn't fit in a pocket and cost well over three times the price of the iKIT.

26 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. infuriating by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's infuriating. I already have a computer the size of a cell phone. It's called a "cell phone". Damn it, why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

    1. Re:infuriating by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cell phone companies would come out with that kind of stuff, if people quit buying cell phones from the service providers, and instead bought them from the cell phone manufacturers.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:infuriating by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be great, if their service providers would let them.

      And IMOVIO sounds like something one would take to relieve constipation.

    3. Re:infuriating by east+coast · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let me ask: Why should it matter where we buy it from? If anything you would think the manufacturers would find accessories of this nature to have high profit margins compared to their phones. I know I'd buy into it.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:infuriating by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Carriers want you using the easiest phone to support and the phones that use the least data. Highly capable phones are a nightmare, especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish.

      They don't really want you to use data, they just want the money for having it available, just like your ISP. So they'll sell you a branded phone, that's locked to hell so you can't do much besides buy ringtones.

      Easy solution to locked phones: don't buy them (yes, I just heard thousands of Apple fanboys gasp at the though of not having Steve's latest piece of crap). Go get an unlocked phone and use a GSM carrier, that wasn't so hard was it?

    5. Re:infuriating by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe you ought to move to a country with a live market instead staying in one with a five year plan...

      Just sayin.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:infuriating by couchslug · · Score: 4, Funny

      "especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish."

      I'm a radish, and find the comparison insulting.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  2. Screen pixels? by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the screen pixels? An Eee 700 is usable at 800x480; this can't go much below that and be usable on the modern Web. Even if the resulting text is Flyspeck 3, at least it'll be detailed Flyspeck 3 rather than pixelated.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Screen pixels? by BUL2294 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Someone posted on the original article's forum that it's 320x240. Unfortunately, in this day and age, that resolution borders on useless. Sure, for 80x25 text or for an old VGA 320x200 DOS game it would be cool. But to do anything of recent vintage, you'll end up having to pan-and-scan in zoom mode to see a webpage. Hell, I don't like browsing on my Toshiba Libretto 110CT--and that's 800x480... (And my complaints are with the screen resolution, not speed--Firefox 3 runs acceptably on it).

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  3. Star Trek by Malluck · · Score: 3, Informative

    So at what point can we start calling these things tricorders and be done with the whole sub-sub-mini-micro-net-note-laptops?

    1. Re:Star Trek by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once they get banned from holodecks.

  4. No touch typing? by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Informative

    No thanks. I already have a cellphone with a thumb keyboard.

    --
    Gone!
  5. Not unprecedented by JustinOpinion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computers of this size and form-factor are not totally unprecedented. Things like the Nokia N810 internet tablet are similar. (QWERTY keyboard, fits in your pocket, WiFi or bluetooth connectivity...). Also, many smartphones have all the features and functionality of this device (including having a physical keyboard, etc.) with the advantage of direct connectivity through the cell network.

    The only thing this new device can offer is a somewhat lower price ($175 instead of >$400 for the N810). But I think this device will only appeal to a very small market (most people would prefer to spend a bit more for a more capable device, or get something with a bigger screen/keyboard).

  6. But does it run Linux by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2.6?

    Let's hope 2.4 stays supported for some time to come.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  7. Nokia by rlp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nokia has a line of small devices that do the same thing. The 770 (which I use) and 800 have on-screen keyboards, the 810 has a slide-down keyboard. The access the internet via WiFi or a bluetooth connection on a phone.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  8. Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    After shrinking down audio technology with integrated circuits, true audiophiles decided that big, 'ol honkers with tubes are better. I predict that the same will happen with PCs. What? A PC in your pocket, how mundane. I have a tube powered ENIAC in my basement. In fact, it IS my basement.

    I can really tell the difference, because every month when the power bill comes, I know it must be good, because it is using butt-loads of electricity.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  9. The only reason we are calling this a "Computer" by gblackwo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is because unlike our cellphones/pdas which have the same functionality, this is a clamshell design that looks like a shrunken laptop.

  10. The line between a computer and a pda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..goes between whether I can type with it using more than two fingers or not. Fail. Next.

  11. PDA Specs by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Informative

    The specs seem much closer to a PDA than a netbook. Also the choice of using a 2.4 based Linux is interesting. I admit I haven't been following Linux on Xscale, so perhaps that explains the choice. Personally I expect more general purpose use out of a "computer" and these specs seem like it's more geared for PDA use.

    - Processor: Marvell PXA270 312MHz
    - ROM: 128 MB, RAM: 64 MB SDRAM
    - User data: 12MB, User media files: 23MB

    - Operating System: Linux 2.4.19
    - User Interface GUI: Proprietary plus Trolltech QT/E 2.3.8
    - Bluetooth® 2.0 with EDR, supports wireless stereo headset
    - (A2DP) & DUN profile
    - WIFI® IEEE 802.11 b/g
    - Optional USB connection configured for HSDPA dongle
    - QWERTY/AZERTY + numeric keys, other languages optional
    - Micro SD (up to 8GB)
    - 2.8 inch QVGA, TFT, 260,000 colors, landscape

    http://www.webitpr.com/release_detail.asp?ReleaseID=10258

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  12. For more info by Seakip18 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    here's the actually spec and release data.

    It looks neat and I'm sure it works well...but smartphones have GPS and 3G/data plans built in. Most have some developer support good to go and better cameras. Ultra-portables have a better keyboard/mouse, more ports to connect crap and full web browsers. Hell, some allow you to just stick in SIM card, rolling all 3 into 1.

    The battery life is ok but not great, seeing how long it takes to charge. It honestly fills no niche or even covers everything. Solid Meh.

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
  13. We already have cell-phone sized computers by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pretty soon, your iPod/iPhone is going to be your computer. You'll be able to have your iPhone in your pocket, walk in to any building, sit at a thin client (monitor & keyboard) and connect to your iPhone using a physical cable and possibly even BlueTooth or Wi-Fi. Soon your iPhone/iPod will be a wearable computer, with sunglasses for the display and a bluetooth headset. Commands will be spoken into the handset instead of typing. You'll meet somebody and be able to look at their MySpace/Facebook while you're talking to them face to face.

    Do you think I have a decent chance on the speaking circuit as a futurist? :-)

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  14. iPhone? by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, my iPhone can:

    Access Google Apps for document processing.
    Access the internet in a normal fashion (non-WAP)
    Check email
    Calendaring
    PDFs
    Hook up to data projectors using the component cable adapter
    Play music on my home stereo/computer/car
    And honestly, looking at that keyboard on this sub-sub-notebook, the iPhone's input is likely better (I'm one of the lucky people who LOVES the iPhone keyboard)
    SSH using a new app I bought (sorry...I did buy it)
    RDP using a free app (not as good as the SSH app, but it does let me control my office webcam)
    Play games
    Make lightsaber sounds

    Seriously...this sub-sub-notebook doesn't offer anything I don't have and that the iPhone (and likely other phones) don't already do better.

  15. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by kftrendy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah. A TRUE computophile won't settle for less than a full-fledged Analytical Engine. Gears are the true analog circuits! I can really tell the difference, because every month when the coal bill comes, I know it must be good, because it is using butt-loads of coal.

  16. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Burning all that coal is going to black out our atmosphere and leave the world in shambles for our children and animals. When you decide to finally join the 21st century, you'll learn that CLEAN computphiles use hydraulic analytical engines powered by slaves on rowers! I can really tell the difference, because every month when the mortality report comes, I know it must be good, because I'm going through butt-loads of slaves.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  17. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by Hercynium · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was hard to see, since it was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf...

    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  18. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by syzler · · Score: 3, Funny

    How appropriate that a user named CorporateSuit refers to his IT team as "slaves on rowers."