Slashdot Mirror


For 3 Years, Scammers Ran Truckless Trucking Company

mikesd81 writes "Wired reports Nicholas Lakes and Viachelav Berkovich are charged with computer fraud [PDF] for a man-in-the-middle attack that allegedly let them run a profitable trucking company without the hassle of driving a truck. For over three years the Russian immigrants hacked a Department of Transportation website called Safersys.org, which maintains a list of licensed interstate trucking companies and brokers. They then went on forums where brokers advertise cargo in need of transportation and negotiate a deal, for example, to transport cargo from American Canyon, California, to Jessup, Maryland, for $3,500. But instead of transporting the load, they would outsource the job to another trucking company posing as the legitimate company whose identity they'd hijacked. They would then invoice the company and take the money. When the company that owned the actual truck tried to contact the company that needed the goods delivered, they found they knew nothing about it. Over all they made nearly $500,000."

27 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmm by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds a bit like the music industry to me.

    When the time comes for the artists to get paid...

    --
  2. Wait... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

    1)Start trucking company
    2)... 3)Profit!


    So this is actually a valid business model?!?

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:Wait... by rugatero · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's improper because they didn't pay the damn subcontractors. It's incredible that they sustained it for three years.

      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
    2. Re:Wait... by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They were not subcontractors. The criminals were imitating contractors and taking money in their name. When the real contractors showed up, the goods were there, but the money had been paid to someone else.

    3. Re:Wait... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No.

      The criminals imitated a legitimate trucking company, bid on and won loads, then subcontracted the actual hauling out to a second trucking company. When the load was delivered, the criminals would pocket the money. When the subcontractor that did the actual hauling would contact the legitimate company to get paid, the company wouldn't know anything about it because said company was impersonated by the criminals.

      The scam worked like this:
      Criminals hack into SaferSys.org and get the info of trucking company A.
      They would then go on a load board and bid on and win a load from company B.
      Then, as A they would contract trucking company C to haul the load for B
      When the load was delivered, B would pay the criminals thinking they were paying A.
      The criminals then disappear with the money.
      Meanwhile company C would contact A to get paid for actually hauling the load and A would have no idea what C was talking about.

      Got it?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Wait... by Zenaku · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're incorrect. The criminals would replace the phone number of an approved contractor with their own number, and then pose as that company when the customer with goods to ship called them up to arrange a contract. They'd then turn around and, still posing as the legitimate trucking company, subcontract the job to someone else who would actually pickup the goods and deliver them.

      Thus, the customer pays the criminals to move the goods, and the criminals get the subcontractor to do it, then they just don't pay the subcontractor. If the subcontractor wants to complain, he just ends up talking to the company that the criminals were impersonating, who has not been involved at all up to that point.

      The "real contractors" never show up to ship anything -- they are just the "fall guy" who the customer and subcontractor both thought they were dealing with.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    5. Re:Wait... by inviolet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thanks for that explanation.

      Has anyone noticed that these two zeebs didn't actually earn a very good living with this scam?

      Two guys laboring for three years to produce ~$500,000... that is an annual salary of $83K apiece, which is good pay for a regular low-risk job but lousy pay for a high-risk situation like this one. And lo and behold the risk occurred and stung them both.

      The more stories like this I hear about, the more I think that most criminals work too hard for their take, and ought to reconsider.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    6. Re:Wait... by billsnow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      83K per year per person is pretty lucrative for small-time criminals. They don't pay any taxes. They live in their immigrant neighborhoods, which have a low cost of living (even in cities like brooklyn). There is no such thing as high-risk to immigrant criminals, except for deportation, of course. Pretty good scam, considering they didn't need a lot of people (no credit).

      (didn't RTFA)

    7. Re:Wait... by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the contrary, where can you find a job doing anything legal which nets you $83k after taxes and lets you (a) work from home (b) not bother to work when you don't want to and (c) only requires a few hours a month (which is all they probably did). If the 83k were taxable, it would put them in the top 23% of wage earners in the US, and if you account for taxes on top of their (untaxed) 83k (i.e. payroll and income), you're solidly in the top 15% in take-home.

      Trust me, being a criminal is far less time intensive than a steady job at the same wage. Most of these guys would probably struggle to hold down a $22-30,000/yr service position in the "real world".

      Besides, now it looks like they'll get free room and board for several years.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:Wait... by mr_mischief · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The story of hacking isn't bullshit. They changed the contact info for the companies they were impersonating to numbers they controlled. It says so in TFA. The scam may have worked without that step, but according to the article that's what they did.

      Also, it's funny that if they'd paid the subcontractor and kept the difference, they'd probably still be running the scam. They'd probably be able to rip off the brokers indefinitely if the trucking companies were happy with their pay and arrangements. It seems it was the angry trucking companies coming back on the brokers they thought hired them that caused this to break open.

      A smaller, slower take could have given them a good steady side income for years longer. If the only crime was posing as some broker and using that broker's good name to garner business, they'd get light sentences even if they were caught. If they could have ramped up to where they were stealing 3% or 4% of every broker's business, they'd have been able to live very comfortably.

    9. Re:Wait... by berashith · · Score: 4, Funny

      ya, but there is no insurance or matching 401k.

    10. Re:Wait... by guruevi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't understand. Can you repeat this with Alice, Bob, Carol and Ted?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:Wait... by iapetus · · Score: 4, Funny

      No. In this case it's got to be Anastasia, Boris, Katya and Taras.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  3. And, as usual... by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Funny

    The true middle man, Keyser Soze, gets off scot free.

  4. These people should be considered heroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The most environmentally friendly trucking company EVER.

    1. Re:These people should be considered heroes by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...at which point there's one less truck driving around, and the environment is just a little bit happier. :-p

  5. yro? by TastyCakes · · Score: 4, Funny

    What does yro mean? It has been driving me nuts...

  6. I was scammed by these guys by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nice guys, they're very persuasive in person. Vitaly is loud, boisterous, always wants to have a good time. He wears fine suits and a lot of gold. Vlade is quieter, and he seems to have some sort of brooding intensity. He was always wearing track suits and listening to Run-DMC.

    I honestly believed that these were best guys for transporting my adult novelties across state lines. This can be illegal in some jurisdictions (like Texas) and you need someone who knows how to run an illegal business. Since they are Russian, I knew they could handle it.

    They kept telling me that the merchadise was seized at the Texas border by Davy Crockett and Ed Meese, and I believed them for a long time. Finally, after the 3rd shipment I started to suspect something. All of a sudden, the phone stopped ringing. Those Russians had played me for a fool!

    That's when I knew I had to become a symbol. A creature of the night, to frighten away criminal scum like these Russians. I prayed to Jesus, and he transformed me into...the Bat-Man!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:I was scammed by these guys by SkunkPussy · · Score: 5, Informative

      informative?

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    2. Re:I was scammed by these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny?

  7. Re:More Info! by Coraon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure I'll add you to the newsletter, for $50.00 (In actuality I wont, I'll get someone else to write the newsletter and when he goes looking for these guys who are supposed to be writing it I'll get off scott free)

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  8. Computer fraud? Or just plain fraud by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In earlier years, this kind of fraud could have been executed over the telephone, or through the mail. Why does the medium that was used affect the specific criminal charge applied -- "computer fraud"? Just plain fraud would do nicely.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  9. Re:Well.... by gnick · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, if that's what they were doing they could have set up a legitimate business and possibly been successful.

    They weren't "taking a slice off the top" - They were taking the whole pie, having the sub-contractors haul the loads they'd committed to, and then leaving the drivers uncompensated because they had in fact been hired by scammers rather than a legitimate contracting firm. Contacting the actual contracting firms did no good because they had no knowledge of the contract and the $$ had gone to the Russians.

    I admit that the summary was a little hard to follow - I had to read it a couple of times too - TFA makes the situation much more clear.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  10. Crime does not pay by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All that work by several people over three years to make $500K? There were apparently more people involved than the two indicted, and they had some operating costs. So they might have made $50K/year per participant, if they were lucky. And they had all the hassles of running a business. Even without the "going to jail" part, this was a lose.

    They probably would have done better running a legit trucking brokerage, which they clearly knew how to do. They had to do all the selling and paperwork a real broker would do. Worse, their scam model didn't allow for much repeat business, so they had to keep hustling to find new customers.

  11. Re:Wait... EXACTLY. It took 3 years to shut down? by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just another example of how the FBI is failing the people of the USA. There is no way this should have taken 3 years to shut down.

    It's not even an example where the FBI helped a company but would not help individuals. Most (if not all) of the victims were companies.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  12. Owner of a trucking company speaks out. by Toll_Free · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been going on for years.

    I OWN a trucking company now, and have been dealing with assholes like this for years.

    Whats becoming even MORE of a problem is the illegals who go out and steal (borrow) an MC and/or DOT number and slap it on the side of their truck. Then they "go to work".

    What with my insurance costing me > 1200 A MONTH, PER TRUCK, it is easy to see why someone would want to "run illegally". It's fairly hard to get caught, unless you run across state lines. Hence, most of the people don't.

    If your truck is titled, with a sticker for the correct weight, you don't go over it, and you don't have any other reason for a scale to flag you, then they don't pull you in. You don't get pulled in, you don't get busted.

    At the risk of being called a racist, the BIGGEST Lusers of this type of behavior, are mexicans. Period. And, this isn't a local trend (California), this is a NATIONAL trend.

    Whats sad is this: The idiots doing THIS scam didn't have to hack anything. All they had to do is look up a legit DOT / MC number for a BROKER, and then go into business with the same business name.

    And brokers licenses are CHEAP. Instead of my insurance rates (600/month liability (1 million dollars), 1000/6 months Cargo, 500/month basic liability (the 600 a month liability doesn't cover you, unless you have a loaded trailer or a load in the "box truck")). For a brokers license, you need a basic 10K dollar insurance policy. Costs, at most, about 250 a month, if you go to the right insurance agent. BOC3 filings cost another 100 a year.

    These people are the reasons trucking businesses are going out of business. It's hard enough having to make 3.00 a mile, when most freight will pay you 1.50 to 2.00 a mile. Then you get the .ru faggots in there stealing business, etc.

    They went even farther than that. According to the Owner / Operator Independant Drivers Association (http://www.ooida.org), they have pulled Russian's out of trucks who didn't speak A WORD OF ENGLISH, where UNABLE to properly identify 3 road signs, etc., and WHERE BEHIND THE WHEEL OF 80,000 to 120,000 pound trucks. However, if you REALLY research it, you can / will find that most people who are running illegally, carry names like Jose, Manuel, etc.

    Sad state of affairs, having to try to make money while people operating illegally are competing with you. Even sadder state of affairs when legal companies are getting profits skimmed off them from illegal brokers, and having to deal with Hose-A and Hose-B running illegally.

    Thank GOD I had dedicated accounts who paid me regularly, and everything else was handled COD.

    This isn't going to stop, nor is it going to go away. It's a fact of life, and until they do PrePass on EVERY truck (somewhat like RFID, but uses EasyTag type devices in the trucks), everyone who operates on the road has to deal with people like this.

    --Toll_Free

    (disclaimer: I took a motorcycle into a wall at 130MPH 6 or so months ago. My company closed at that time, so read into this what you will. Unfortunately, this WAS work related, the motorcycle was a customers, and the throttle cable stuck in a 3/4 gear shift getting the bike to my trailer.)

  13. Re:500k isnt that much by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Funny

    500k should be enough for everybody.