Slashdot Mirror


Belgian ISP Scores Victory In Landmark P2P Case

secmartin writes "Belgian ISP Scarlet scored an important victory in the first major European test of copyright law. The interim decision forcing them to block transfers of copyrighted materials via P2P has been reversed, because the judge agreed with Scarlet that the measures the Belgian RIAA proposed to implement proved to be ineffective. A final decision is expected next year."

7 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Not a victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thats not a landmark victory, thats a "your honor their idiots their idea doesn't work" "your right don't waste your time."

    All they got there was a "That doesn't work" not a "you can't do that"

    1. Re:Not a victory by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thats not a landmark victory, thats a "your honor their idiots their idea doesn't work" "your right don't waste your time."

      All they got there was a "That doesn't work" not a "you can't do that"

      Don't abuse the troll mod, this isn't trolling. After reading the TFA I tend to agree as it says "The court has now ruled in favor of Scarlet, staying the fine until the final ruling in this case which is expected about a year from now." Basicly, they haven't been able to make the filtering work and since they've been at it for years I doubt they will a year from now either, but this ruling doesn't say they need not implement a filtering system, only that they won't be fined until there's a filtering system that works. I don't think one can be made to work, but who knows what a judge might decide next year - "This is a POS but it's better than nothing"? A good ruling yes, but the last word has not been said.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  2. Re:common sense: 1 by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Insightful

    0/10, plagarized; Original work is required for passing grade.

  3. So.. by Aerynvala · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If people use public transportation to move 'stolen' goods, does that mean stores should have the right to sue the transit authorities running the bus systems? Because that's pretty much what that case amounts to.

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
  4. Re:Belgian RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think I can solve this with a Twitter analogy:

    Slashdot has an insane user called Twitter, he comes out with a lot of weird shit, just like the RIAA. Then a user called freenix appears and spouts the same weirdness, as do a bunch of other users. They all have different names and UIDs than Twitter but, if it talks like Twitter, if it doesn't post anything other than support for Twitter, it's safe to assume that it is Twitter.

    The same is true of the Belgian RIAA: if it talks like the RIAA and litigates like the RIAA, it's safe to assume that it is the RIAA.

    Think about it, the RIAA is made up of the world's most powerful record labels. They may have registered different names, but they're the same beast underneath. :)

  5. Re:Belgian RIAA by Aerynvala · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I vote we call them the Borg. They have that whole assimilation/destruction, adherence to bland uniformity in common.

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
  6. Re:Belgian RIAA by FrankDrebin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hear hear. I also suggest we pronounce the * correctly as "hole".

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?