Slashdot Mirror


Space Litter To Hit Earth Tomorrow

A refrigerator-sized tank of toxic ammonia, tossed from the international space station last year, is expected to hit earth tomorrow afternoon or evening. The 1,400-pound object was deliberately jettisoned — by hand — from the ISS's robot arm in July 2007. Since the time of re-entry is uncertain, so is the location. "NASA expects up to 15 pieces of the tank to survive the searing hot temperatures of re-entry, ranging in size from about 1.4 ounces (40 grams) to nearly 40 pounds (17.5 kilograms). ... [T]he largest pieces could slam into the Earth's surface at about 100 mph (161 kph). ...'If anybody found a piece of anything on the ground Monday morning, I would hope they wouldn't get too close to it,' [a NASA spokesman] said."

14 of 443 comments (clear)

  1. Cloudy by DeadPixels · · Score: 5, Funny

    With a chance of toxic ammonia-coated metal chunks?

    1. Re:Cloudy by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Space trash wins. Next question.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Cloudy by Suzuran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Newton.

    3. Re:Cloudy by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      17 kg at 160 kph could hit the earth anywhere?
      What if it hits SOMETHING, like a car in the highway or an airplane?

      A Boeing 747 with mass 340,000 kg takes off from JFK airport at 3:00 pm and heads towards Los Angeles at a cruising speed of 800 kph. A refrigerator-sized tank of toxic ammonia with mass 17 kg jettisoned from the ISS 560 days prior is about to achieve re-entry at 160 kph. Where and when will they meet?

      I hate these stupid questions.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
  2. "toxic ammonia"? by penginkun · · Score: 5, Funny

    As opposed to that non-toxic, safe-to-eat, oh-so-good-for-you ammonia they sell down at the cleaning supplies store?

    1. Re:"toxic ammonia"? by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it's called salmiak and it's probably an acquired taste. I have heard of a person who said that it tasted like catpiss. But on the other hand, the Americans invented McDonalds so I guess that makes us even :)

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:"toxic ammonia"? by dkf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is idiocy a prerequisite for getting mod points?

      No, but it helps! After all, I've been modded up quite a few times over the years...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  3. Re:Current data on object by bruins01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your sig takes on a whole new meaning in light of that quotation in the summary.

  4. Re:Could/Should we push all the junk back at earth by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't have a big enough shark to mount the laser on at the moment.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  5. Hrmm... by hack++slash · · Score: 5, Funny

    When this refrigerator sized chunk hits the ground and finally stops rolling, will it open and Indiana Jones falls out?

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  6. Re:clue ? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 40 pound child is a little more...yielding than a 40 pound chunk of metal. Also, the 40 pound chunk of metal would presumably be falling on the car from above, not hitting the car head-on. So yah, it may not actually reduce the entire car to a smoking crater, but it would likely total it.

    So, while I have no doubt you have plentiful experience striking 40 pound children with vehicles, I'm not sure that experience is directly applicable to the situation at hand.

  7. Re:Could/Should we push all the junk back at earth by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Assuming a capable laser system, would a gentle laser push towards earth be a good way to clean up space junk? Would away from earth be better?

    A laser which would simply annihilate the junk would be admittedly cooler, but could de-orbit be accomplished with much less power?

    Last time I tried to get my car to roll backwards by turning on the headlights, it took a really long time....

  8. Re:clue by RockWolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, while I have no doubt you have plentiful experience striking 40 pound children with vehicles, I'm not sure that experience is directly applicable to the situation at hand.

    We start by assuming a perfectly spherical 40lb child of uniform density...

    --
    February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  9. Re:clue by melted+keyboard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok,... American child,... got it. What next?