Slashdot Mirror
Windows 7 To Be 256-Core Aware
unassimilatible writes "As new features of Windows 7 continue to trickle out, ZDNet is now reporting that it will scale to 256 processors. While one has to wonder, like with Vista, how many of the teased features will actually make it into the final OS, I think we can all agree, 256 cores is enough for anybody." This Mark Russinovich interview has some technical details (Silverlight required).
While one has to wonder, like with Vista, how many of the teased features will actually make it into the final OS
If you're going by their track record, it's an easy answer: None.
My browser already supports audio, video, vector graphics and a scripting language.
.... testing the waters via marketing that which may or not come into some form of existence.
They use the same tactic as well, to help suppress any interest a competitor might be getting with some technology by claiming they are doing the same, where often enough they kill teh support teh competitor was getting while never producing that which they claimed they were doing.
So take this current claim in such a light and you'll know "believe it when you know you have it and are using it, not even a split second before".
No Silverlight, no Moonlight, it's bad enough that I've got to deal with Microsoft's broken security zones at work, I'm not going to start running son-of-ActiveX at home.
It's a moot point. It's likely that processors will eventually have more than 256 cores, but that's going to take a long time, I'm not necessarily convinced that we will. At some point we will hit the smallest possible transister size and I'm not sure that will leave physical room for all the extra cores without moving to a much larger chip size.
That being said, if we're still using Windows 7 when mainstream computers have more than 256 cores there's something very wrong going on. Linux probably will need that kind of scalability, but it's because of the sort of rolling release schedule where releases are expected to be based upon the previous version, if loosely at times.
Like anybody in their right mind would ever consider putting windows on a 1024 processor machine used for 'real high end stuff'.
Let's remember for a moment where most installations of windows will be.
Actually i never had the need to install it, i think that the only SL sites that i tried to visit were MS's ones
The thing that gets me is: was this a bait and switch to get people to install siverlight to see something that sounded really interesting? When I saw the "Need to upgrade browser/install siverlight" I felt nothing but digust.
Here is an opportunity for Microsoft to demonstrate something cool and what do they do to all the folks who can never get silverlight to run on their operating systens? Yeah, tell them "Piss off! You're unclean! You can't watch our video!" That's a great way Microsoft to try convince folks to give your technology a try. Way to go Ohio.
The second thing I noticed was the sudden feeling that this was a poor imitation of Google Tech talks, in which you can watch the videos in any operating system, because google is more interested in getting the word out than trying to "sell" or "slip under the radar" some new multimedia transport mechanism.
If you click on the OP's score, you'll see that there is no modding history unlike for your own comment that has a +1 karma bonus. This suggests to me that the OP has bad karma from previous downmods, i.e. he has not been downmodded for this post.
and was impressed by how much they'd slimmed down Windows 7.
Hail Eris, full of mischief...
E pluribus sanguinem
...and you'll need a license for every core.
Because people who get the joke are going to laugh and move on. Only people who don't get the joke, or who want to make a lame follow-on joke, are going to hit the submit button. (Or people who are annoyed by the previous groups.)
Self-selection bias explains a lot about the stuff you find on the Internet.
Says the idiot who never saw such an obvious joke?
Hand in your geek card and go browse 4chans /b/, you would fit right in there.
Ask yourself, when was the the last time a Microsoft upgrade made your applications perform faster, require less resources, or made you more efficient?
Actually all three, with Vista's intelligent caching of programs into memory. Almost every program I use launches instantly, because I (like almost everyone else) have very set usage patterns, and Vista has picked up on them. And if you don't have the extra memory, it's not required.
What kind of shit-site is linked to?
"Microsoft Silverlight may not be supported on your computer's hardware or operating system. "
When going to that site http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Mark-Russinovich-Inside-Windows-7/
it suggests Install Silverlight !
then when coming to http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/resources/install.aspx?mode=sysreq&reason=unsupportedplatform
So those claiming that Silverlight were only needing JavaScript (Ajax) on the client-side were lying!
Kepp your shitty site!
What I still am unclear of, is why you have to bitch and moan? If you don't want to use it, don't use it. Simple as that.
If only everyone who doesn't like Windows did that, Slashdot would be much better off.
"It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
Our IT deparment must be nuts for running Windows Compute Cluster on their system then.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Advice: on VPS providers
There is a problem with your argument. You are thinking in terms of a monolithic operating system. They could keep everything on the installation disks and only install the parts that are desired (like Linux is). If you later on needed another service you could put in in with what is on the installation disk.
That can be indeed the source where it is turned into "640k should be enough for everybody" Most likely he has said the same to many people. Not everything was always written down. Sometimes things are written down much later either from rememberence or from others.
That makes it not so much a litteral quote, but more an idea.
So in 1981 he said that 640k would be enough for everybody for the next ten years. After 6 years it wasn't anymore, so during 4 years there was a moment where he had claimed that 640K was enough and it wasn't.
For me with the above it is clear that he has said it, even if in other words.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
It would be considerably more interesting if Windows 7 offered an out-of-the-box processing abstraction on top of GPGPUs, PhysX type accelerators, and other non-traditional "cores".
Most enthusiast PCs and increasing numbers of mainstream PCs have been running a multi-core video card for a while now - it would be nice to see the development interface to these standardized, so one didn't necessarily have to learn e.g. CUDA.
There are no karma whores, only moderation johns