Slashdot Mirror


How 10 Iconic Tech Products Got Their Names

lgmac writes "Think Windows Azure is a stupid name? Ever wonder how iPod, BlackBerry and Twitter got their names? Author Tom Wailgum goes inside the process of creating tech product names that are cool but not exclusionary, marketable, and most of all, free of copyright and trademark gotchas. Here's the scoop on ten iconic tech products and how they got their monikers, plus a chat with the man responsible for naming Azure, BlackBerry, and more. (What's the one he wishes he'd named but didn't? Google.)"

13 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I bet... by mfh · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...it involved a lot of pot.

    According to the article, it has to do with a lot more than smoking pot. Lexicon Branding typically uses well known and loved words, phrases and syllables, in trendy-sounding configurations, and I would stress that smoking pot in doing so would only help you reach that type of audience, and in most cases Lexicon's audience is much broader than that.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  2. No Copyright For Names by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

    > ...free of copyright ... gotchas.

    A name cannot have any "copyright gotchas" . Names cannot be protected by copyright.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  3. Second? Try third. by jspenguin1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firefox was actually the third name. Its original name was Phoenix (it rose from the ashes of Netscape), but Phoenix Technologies raised a fuss. Then it became Firebird, and the Firebird database team raised a fuss. Then it became Firefox, and Debian didn't like that and called it IceWeasel. Anyone remember the FireSomething plugin that would randomly change the name.

    1. Re:Second? Try third. by barzok · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then it became Firefox, and Debian didn't like that and called it IceWeasel.

      No, Debian was forced to rename it due to their stance on trademarks.

      The Firefox logo is trademarked, so Debian doesn't consider it to be Free and will not include it as part of its distribution. Mozilla claims that using the Firefox name without the official branding is a trademark violation.

      Furthermore, Mozilla claims that if Debian runs any patches to the version of Firefox included with Debian distros, it has to run them by Mozilla first for approval.

      http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3634591

  4. Re:Windows 7 by Tadrith · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it's based on the official major releases of Windows NT, since the 9x kernel was abandoned.

    1. Windows NT 3.1
    2. Windows NT 3.5
    3. Windows NT 4.0
    4. Windows 2000
    5. Windows XP
    6. Windows Vista
    7. Windows 7

  5. Debian was ok with Firefox by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative

    > Then it became Firefox, and Debian didn't like that and called it IceWeasel.

    Debian had no objection whatever to calling it Firefox. Mozilla objected to Debian doing so.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  6. Re:I bet... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 5, Informative

    A team of namers is given the parameters of the project -
    product / company type
    target audience
    what sort of feeling the name should convey
    the regions that the name will be used in

    Namers then go off on their own and compose massive lists of names. I've seen the names run the gamut from simple mashups of common words to mashups of greek / latin roots to words based on etymological research of the original target "feeling" words. Then the namers get together and reduce the list down to a set of finalists before presenting them for client review.

    Sometimes it takes a few iterations... Particularly if the objective is to get a globally trademarkable word that won't be misinterpreted as meaning anything offensive in another country.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  7. Re:MSFT by residieu · · Score: 2, Informative

    The security dialog problem is overrated. They only pop up when you'd expect them to pop up. When you're installing things or modifying system wide-settings. Mac OS and Gnome/KDE will do the same thing. The only difference is that Vista doesn't make you reenter your password, it just alerts you that something's up.

  8. Re:I bet... by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hence the recent court case with iBM.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  9. Re:I bet... by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Erm wasnt that Linksys?

    If I recall correctly they didnt actually make a product for sale.

    Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

  10. Re:I bet... by b96miata · · Score: 4, Informative

    it was InfoGear, who were later acquired by cisco, who later used the same trademark to launch another, unrelated product under the linksys brand. There's a whole blurb about it on the iPhone's wikipedia article. While I never bought any of the products in question, they all seem to have been available from the usual channels at their time of launch.

  11. Re:German naming process... by carou · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pun fail.

    It's pronounced like ""wuster"".

  12. Re:His explanation of Google's name is BS by machine321 · · Score: 2, Informative

    when was the last time you heard of yahoo?

    Every couple of weeks when Microsoft doesn't buy them.