Slashdot Mirror


Boot Windows Vista In Four Seconds

arcticstoat writes "Asus' budget motherboard wing, ASRock, claims that it's found a way to load a clean boot of Windows from a full shut down in just four seconds, using its new Instant Boot technology. The technology takes advantage of the S3 and S4 features of ACPI, which normally enable the Sleep/Standby and Hibernation modes in Windows respectively. However, by calling them at different times in the boot-up and shutdown process, Instant Boot enables you to boot up to your Windows desktop in three to four seconds, even after a proper shut down. Two modes are available; Fast mode, which uses S3 and boots up in around four seconds, and Regular Mode, which uses S4 and apparently takes between 20 and 22 seconds to boot. The advantage of Instant Boot when compared with normal Sleep and Hibernation modes is that you get the advantage of a clean boot of Windows, without what ASRock calls 'accumulated garbage data,' and you also get the security of knowing that you won't lose any data if there's a power cut and you lose AC power. There's also a video of it in action at the link above."

70 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Video by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those guys in the video are having WAY too much fun with their jobs. "Why your computer boot so fast? I must get ASRock motherboard!"

    Now I know why ASUS mobos tend to be so good. They encourage a fun workplace. ;-)

    1. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really? I was sure I just learned Asus motherboards are such high quality because their engineers have a lame sense of humor, leading to a diminished social life with more time to devote towards motherboard perfection.

    2. Re:Video by Netsplitter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My personal experience is the same as yours. The motherboards are great, if you can get your hardware to work on them. I've found compatibility with different kinds of memory to be especially terrible, but they usually work after BIOS updates which, thankfully, Asus seem to release often. Of course, one could argue they should get it right the first time; I do, and it's why I don't buy Asus anymore.

    3. Re:Video by WhiteHorse-The+Origi · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you believe this, I have a desktop cold-fusion device that you can buy for $25.

  2. ASRock is not ASUS by vwpau227 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ASRock is not ASUS. Hua Ching, the subsidiary that was spun off from ASUS is not any longer a part of the ASUS organization. See http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2002/11/05/asus-distances-itself-from-asrock-subsidiary for details. There are a number of companies locally and elsewhere that have been pushing cheap ASRock mainboards as being the same quality as ASUS mainboards. We have seen many issues with the ASRock mainboards, both in premature failure and incompatibilities, that we have not seen at all in ASUS mainboards. ASUS has its own low-end set of mainboards and they are much better than the ASRock, from my experience. The sooner this sort of misinformation gets sorted out, the better informed the consumer will be.

    --
    These are the good old days you'll be telling your children about. Make them worthwhile.
    1. Re:ASRock is not ASUS by vwpau227 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work at a computer store in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. However, I would like to point out that as far as my comments are concerned, I speak only for myself here, not where I work.

      --
      These are the good old days you'll be telling your children about. Make them worthwhile.
    2. Re:ASRock is not ASUS by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for that. It's important to have a citation when making claim about reliability -- it's one of those things that you never find in the specs, and if you do it's likely based on a formula or model and not from rigorous testing.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:ASRock is not ASUS by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Informative

      They've fixed that. The bad caps affected many other manufacturers at the time.
      Evidently a Japanese researcher wanted to make a few bucks and sold info on a new cap design that was bought by the Chinese who went out and made millions. Unfortunately they didn't realise that it needed a special dialectric coolant and so many electronics died months later.
      As far as Asrock - they still make 487 P4 boards and are common replacements for systems still running that processor.
      Occasionally, XP has kernel problems (kernel running at 100%) for no reason during 99% system idle. In my experience it's a memory timing issue and the BIOS should be set on Auto memory timing which sorts it. Otherwise they are fine.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  3. Proper shutdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately a proper shutdown takes 2 minutes ....

    1. Re:Proper shutdown... by Dan541 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Really I can shut my laptop down in less than 10 seconds, leaving the battery cover off enables me to improve that to 2-3 seconds.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:Proper shutdown... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hp laptops only take half a second to shut down - at least the DV 2000, 6000, and 9000 models, because the slightest bump to the battery release latch most often causes the battery to drop out, contacts first, causing immediate shutdown if you're not plugged in.

      Side note and totally off-topic - WHAT THE FUCK SLASHDOT? Your site has been making my pop-up blocker and Firefox go fucking NUTS today!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Proper shutdown... by binaryspiral · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Side note and totally off-topic - WHAT THE FUCK SLASHDOT? Your site has been making my pop-up blocker and Firefox go fucking NUTS today!

      Ditto... popups are probably the least effective on sites that attract technology minded folks - no, they don't see the ads - it just pisses them off everytime the blocker has to prevent them.

      Screen ads much, Taco?

    4. Re:Proper shutdown... by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this case it is likely true. The only way to accelerate clean boots would be to create it during shutdown, so a clean boot for standby or a clean boot for hibernation. Basically clearing memory of it's current running state and replacing it with a clean boot state and using that as the stored standby or hibernation state. Configuration changes would get messy. Far cleaner just to embed core elements of the Linux kernal straight into the CPU, you can only really do it with Linux because of course closed source immediately bars itself, because it is, closed source.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:Proper shutdown... by PJ1216 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats odd. I don't have any ad-blockers (only popup blockers) but I haven't gotten any popup notifications saying any popups have been blocked at all yesterday or today.

  4. Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if something like this could be done with Linux now that 2.6.27.5 has been out for a few days and that situation with the RESET_REG_SUP bit has been resolved. This certainly is great news for Vista users looking for a new board.

    1. Re:Cool. by Tacvek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are not quite right.

      The fast mode Linux equivalent is to have init suspend the system right before the log-on prompt every time you boot. Then to "shutdown" your computer you actually reboot it. It ends up in S3 sleep stage. When you arive at your computer to use it, you "turn it on" by unsuspending it.

      The other method works EXACTLY the same as the fast mode outlined above, but has init hibernate the computer, rather than suspend it on each boot.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    2. Re:Cool. by GroundBounce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It shouldn't be hard, as long as you have any kernel/motherboard combination where suspend or hibernate work reliably. Just create a shutdown level that actually does a reboot, then modify the startup scripts to immediately do a suspend or hibernate as soon as the machine is booted if that shutdown level was used. The effective shutdown time will be longer (because it's actually a reboot), but the effective "boot" time will be very quick.

      While probably do-able, this actually seems like overkill. Why not just use normal suspend/resume?

  5. Oh believe me, I'd love to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd boot Vista off my work PC in a millisecond if I could

  6. Heh... It's using the Hibernate functionality... by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Informative

    It sounds like all they did was allow you to store a Hibernate to Disk snapshot of your system at startup before anything else gets done- which is technically cheating. ANYTHING can boot up in about 4 or seconds that way. :-D

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  7. Re:get some fucking priorities by Shikaku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And you're posting on Slashdot. What have you done to help save the economy?

    Seriously.

  8. Re:You can't have both by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is exactly like hibernate, but instead of saving the memory image after hours of use it saves an image just after boot.

  9. My guess as to how it's done... by crt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They never show the shutdown process - my guess is that when you shutdown, it actually reboots, then right after Windows boots it puts it to sleep or hibernate (S3/S4). When you turn it back on, it wakes it and looks like you "just" booted up.
    Not really a bad idea I suppose - moves the boot time from boot to shutdown, when you are less likely to care.
    Of course you can get the same effect yourself by rebooting then just putting your machine to sleep when you want to shutdown. Someone could probably even write a simple software solution for this rather than requiring a whole new motherboard.

    1. Re:My guess as to how it's done... by rsborg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course you can get the same effect yourself by rebooting then just putting your machine to sleep when you want to shutdown. Someone could probably even write a simple software solution for this rather than requiring a whole new motherboard.

      I fail to see how what they've done is a bad thing. And I don't think it's quite as easy to script, since you'd have to reconfigure how windows works. If you have an inkling of how to do this in a smooth automated fashion, please do tell me.

      Big question is, if you pull the cord, does it maintain state? Or will that require a "cold boot"?

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    2. Re:My guess as to how it's done... by Egotistical+Rant · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is EXACTLY what it does. The "more images for this article" section at the given link has a flowchart of the process...it's just a reboot and suspend.

    3. Re:My guess as to how it's done... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Big question is, if you pull the cord, does it maintain state? Or will that require a "cold boot"?

      They answered that "big question" in the article. There are two different options the "super fast" boot mode that does the " boot" in four seconds. And a regular fast boot that takes 22 seconds. The four second super fast one, needs to stay plugged in to maintain state. The slower fast one does not.

      I wouldn't recommend swapping out hardware in either case.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:My guess as to how it's done... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Informative

      And I don't think it's quite as easy to script, since you'd have to reconfigure how windows works. If you have an inkling of how to do this in a smooth automated fashion, please do tell me.

      A shutdown script that places C:\Windows\_reboot_quick_boot as an empty file on the file system when you shutdown, and cancels the shutdown in favor of a reboot ('shutdown -a' on Windows, 'shutdown -c' on Unix).

      A boot-time script that runs last and waits about 10 seconds at the log-in screen for keyboard input (and to give the start-up applications a chance to settle, so they don't have to do a lot of work and thrash disk on resume). If it gets keyboard input, it exits. Otherwise, it initiates a hibernate action and then exits. When you resume this hibernate, the program either has exited or is exiting.

      Do I get a blow job now? (I'm a Unix kid, these kinds of problems are obvious to me)

    5. Re:My guess as to how it's done... by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course you can get the same effect yourself by rebooting then just putting your machine to sleep when you want to shutdown. Someone could probably even write a simple software solution for this rather than requiring a whole new motherboard.

      Hmm. It seems like it'd be really easy to do this with an open source OS. I think I may have just found a nifty little project for this weekend. All it should take is:

      • Add an inittab runlevel (7?) for "shutdown to instant boot".
      • Add an /etc/rc7.d with a script that writes a file that records the fact that we're in "shutdown to instant boot" state, then switches to runlevel 6.
      • Add an init script in late in the normal startup sequence that checks for "shutdown to instant boot" state. If it finds that state, it removes the file and then initiates suspend or hibernate, depending on a configuration option.

      At that point "sudo init 7" should cause your machine to shut down to "instant boot" state. Hitting the power button will then "instant boot" it.

      "sudo init 0" or "sudo init 6" will do a normal shutdown or a normal reboot.

      The final step would be to modify the "shutdown" command to go to runlevel 7 when given some new option, and then to modify the GUI-based shutdown tools to provide the instant-boot option as well, and maybe make it the default. Oh, and maybe modify the ACPI script that's executed when the power button is hit so that the power button does a "shutdown to instant boot" by default.

      Pretty easy. Of course, in Linux I don't ever see any reason to shut the machine down anyway. My laptop pretty much only gets rebooted when there's a kernel update to install. Other than that, it just gets suspended. So, kind of pointless in Linux, but easy. The same would apply to *BSD.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:My guess as to how it's done... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 2

      Super fast = reboot at shutdown, then boot OS and go into S3/standby before login; S3 requires constant trickle of power to maintain RAM state.
      Regular fast = reboot at shutdown, then boot OS and go into S4/hibernate before login; S4 writes memory contents to disk, so no power required. Takes longer to "boot" back up as it has to read each bit back into RAM.

      Neither scenario would generally permit swapping out hardware that needs to be enumerated by the BIOS, such as RAM, video cards and SATA disks. USB devices would generally be ok to swap.

  10. Not quite as useful as it seems at first glance... by mgemmons · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTFA: Instant Boot will also only work on Windows systems (XP or Vista) with a single-user account and no password protection.

  11. Re:get some fucking priorities by jmikelittle · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're looking to combine rage and the internet, the best place to start would be a little known site http://youtube.com/ There are a few entries there which fail to call attention to the current fiscal difficulties of major world economies.

  12. Re:Heh... It's using the Hibernate functionality.. by Shin-LaC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That was my first thought too. Do they make any attempts at detecting whether the OS was updated, or new software was installed that requires a reboot, so they can perform a full boot and update the startup snapshot when needed?

  13. BUT... by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it come prepackaged with winrar serials, cracks, M$ documents and source code?

    1. Re:BUT... by duguk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not a troll, this actually happened: Asus Ships Cracking Software On Recovery DVD

  14. What about shutdown? by Plocmstart · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given the flowcharts (not the shiny video that catches your attention first) it appears that instead of shutting down, they simply reboot the system and once it reaches the state where the OS has finished loaded it then goes to sleep or hibernate. Once you power it back on it just returns to the freshly loaded OS.
    So it appears that while it starts up faster, you should end up spending more time shutting down (actually rebooting and reloading the OS). You could also do this manually by rebooting Windows and once it gets to the desktop/login screen go into hibernate/sleep.

  15. Re:What about logon? by CRiMSON · · Score: 5, Informative

    Instant Boot will also only work on Windows systems (XP or Vista) with a single-user account and no password protection.

    from the article..

    --
    oogly boogly!
  16. Re:Heh... It's using the Hibernate functionality.. by erikina · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My guess, is that it wouldn't matter. As when you turn off their computer, they probably behind the scenes turn it back on again. Then hibernate. So a normal "reboot" would be a little slower than usual, and to a user every power on is like opening a fresh copy.

  17. Home test by konohitowa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I pulled on a pair of boots and managed to beat their time by more than 3 seconds.

  18. Re:S3? S4? What is this of which you speak? by supersloshy · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of us don't actually know what S3 and S4 are.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACPI#Power_States

    --
    "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
  19. Re:You can't have both by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, (sorry about another post) they couldn't advertise "not worrying about losing your data if there is a power cut" if the image was taken straight after boot, because it wouldn't have any of your data in it, just OS stuff.

  20. Re:S3? S4? What is this of which you speak? by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of us don't actually know what S3 and S4 are.

    You will after reading this article...

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  21. Re:Not quite as useful as it seems at first glance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not quite as useful as it seems at first glance...

    You're absolutely right: it only works for about 95% of home users out there (a conservative estimate). Now, if it booted Linux as well, then it would be useful!

  22. Re:get some fucking priorities by duguk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surely the faster Windows can boot, the more work can be done by employees? :o)

  23. Cheating... by sofar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is still cheating - it's first of all not actually booting but suspending/resuming (albeit smartly).

    Most importantly the system is not actually shut down, so it still draws power to refresh the memory. This will likely suck on high-performance laptops where the large amounts of ram with high voltages will suck the battery dry in a substantially short time.

    And worse, this technology will take a _long_ time to shutdown. It's sacrificing a lot. We can (really) boot+shutdown a linux box in +- 10 seconds. Would you want a 3 second boot if your shutdown time becomes one minute?

    For people who are on the go a lot and tend to open/close their laptops a lot, this may actually reduce their effective work time a lot.

    1. Re:Cheating... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is still cheating - it's first of all not actually booting but suspending/resuming (albeit smartly).

      Most importantly the system is not actually shut down, so it still draws power to refresh the memory. This will likely suck on high-performance laptops where the large amounts of ram with high voltages will suck the battery dry in a substantially short time.

      And worse, this technology will take a _long_ time to shutdown. It's sacrificing a lot. We can (really) boot+shutdown a linux box in +- 10 seconds. Would you want a 3 second boot if your shutdown time becomes one minute?

      For people who are on the go a lot and tend to open/close their laptops a lot, this may actually reduce their effective work time a lot.

      1) It only draws current in "Fast Mode." The "Regular Mode" still allows for 22 second booting with no power draw.

      2) Most people won't mind the slow shut down, even in a scenario where the computer is being turned on and off frequently. Why? You shut down because you want to do something else, so the computer can painlessly finish the process in the background where you don't need to notice it. Yes, it will hurt battery life by extending the powered up state for a little longer than your actual usage time, but it then shaves most or all of that off of boot time, which is subjectively more critical.

      3) How do you boot a Linux box in negative 10 seconds? "+- 10" looks like a statement of error bounds to me. I think you meant "~10."

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Cheating... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2) Most people won't mind the slow shut down, even in a scenario where the computer is being turned on and off frequently. Why? You shut down because you want to do something else, so the computer can painlessly finish the process in the background where you don't need to notice it. Yes, it will hurt battery life by extending the powered up state for a little longer than your actual usage time, but it then shaves most or all of that off of boot time, which is subjectively more critical.

      Actually this matters to me more than boot time. If I've got to finish with the laptop I want it to shut down and be off as fast as possible.. because I need to *be* somewhere, and it's not safe to put a laptop in a bag whilst it's still shutting down (several collegues have nuked their hard disks trying that one).

  24. Re:get some fucking priorities by ozphx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leave Anonymous Coward alone!!!!!! *tears*

    --
    3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  25. Re:Heh... It's using the Hibernate functionality.. by Tacvek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Correct. That is exactly what they do. So they just shift the boot time to be part of the shutdown time, so when you arrive at your computer again, and turn it on, you are just unsuspending it, or are loading an unusually clean hibernation file. This is a very interesting idea, but it is one that doe not need motherboard support. This can be done by the OS alone.

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  26. No, really, this is clever... by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What it looks like they're doing:

    1. They're taking a snapshot of the system that was made when you hibernated, and restoring that snapshot.
    2. Next time you shut down it restores the same snapshot you made the first time, after your original clean boot.

    The only real issue I see is that your file system cache (and any other file system state) now contains garbage, and will need to be invalidated (NOT FLUSHED). If the cache was left out of the original snapshot then just remounting the file system from scratch should solve that. This isn't really booting (you'll need to repeat the whole process after just about any time you modify system state, including a lot of things like registry changes), but it's also not specific to Windows and should DTRT with Linux, etc...

  27. Re:The Real Question: by Tacvek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The motherboard is not required. Just have your OS automatically hibernate (or for the 3 second boot, automatically suspend) on each clean boot. Then to "shutdown" your computer, just reboot it. Your OS will shut down, and then start again, and enter sleep or hibernation just after it finishes it's restart. So when you approach your computer again, and push the power button, the computer "boots" with very high speed.

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  28. Re:S3? S4? What is this of which you speak? by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    S3 is about as fast as opening the lid of your Macbook, after you've closed it without shutting down.

    S4 is about as fast as powering up your Mac from scratch ;-)

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  29. Re:get some fucking priorities by spintriae · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've tried to relieve my pent up agression by on posting it on Youtube, but the audio preview always makes me feel bad about myself.

  30. Re:get some fucking priorities by MoFoQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is Slashdot....news for nerds, stuff that matters.

    Emphasis on "news for nerds"....it's not news for "stocktraders" or "economists" or even "lawyers".

  31. It will be useless in college student's laptop by holywarrior21c · · Score: 3, Funny

    it won't boot vista in 4 sec, never. at startup 3 expired anti virus programs, 4 messengers, 3 weather programs, 2 ad block...

  32. It's been done in 5 seconds.. by k1e0x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if something like this could be done with Linux now that 2.6.27.5 has been out for a few days and that situation with the RESET_REG_SUP bit has been resolved. This certainly is great news for Vista users looking for a new board.

    It's been done in 5 seconds..

    Doesn't even require a special motherboard, they did it by modifying Fedora on a EEE pc (something not known for it's speed)
    http://lwn.net/Articles/299483/

    Video: http://www.youtube.com/user/arjanintel

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    1. Re:It's been done in 5 seconds.. by k1e0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After reading how the implementation in windows is done by doing pre-hibernation, it makes the Linux method look even more impressive. They start from a clean cold boot.

      Still pre-hibernation is pretty interesting.. I never shut my systems off anyhow though, I always believed that systems left on have a longer life span because the chips never cool down, but that can't be true for some of the computers moving parts..

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  33. Re:get some fucking priorities by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US Government is on the verge of nationalizing 3 failing automakers and you're concerned with how fast you can boot windows? Seriously? The failed
    financial bailout may cause the US government to declare bankruptcy and you care about this shit? Get some priorities!

    Okay, fine, instead of considering product purchases that would fix the economy, I'm going to take your advice and worry about the gubment bailing companies out.

    OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!!

    THey're spending monEeeez to bail them outz!!!!

    I'm so nervous! Worry worry worry worry worry!!!

    Oh noes!!! Waaahhhh!!!1111

    Wow, I see your point, that was so much more worthwhile than what I was doing before I read your post.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  34. YouTube syndrome by istartedi · · Score: 5, Funny

    The video suffers from YouTube syndrome. Symptoms of this condition include one or more minutes of stuff we don't care about. The condition is most extreme when the event we care about is of short duration. Although it is not entirely curable, it can be treated by posting the time of the interesting event in the comments section. In this case, the event in question occurs at 2:38. Remember, this is a treatment not a cure. The treatment still consumes bandwidth and time. In the future, we may have a Flash plug-in where the annotation feature can be used to denote points of interest, with the ability to skip to a keyframe just before said point. Until then, only video posters can prevent YouTube syndrome. Remember, if the event of interest in your video is of short duration, the video should not be any more than twice as long as the actual event. Introduction, at most, should identify you and/or your company. Anything that can be explained more efficiently as text should be put in the little text section that appears in the upper right.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  35. Re:Heh... It's using the Hibernate functionality.. by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This used to be called "cutting part off the string on this end and tying it to the other end". The technique is sometimes useful, but in this case, what if you're also concerned about shutdown time? For instance, I sometimes shut down my laptop at the end of a meeting for various reasons. Shutdown time is important because I have to wait until it shuts down completely before closing it, else it'll suspend and then resume shutting down when I'm trying to boot it up.

    Windows *already* takes too long to shut down -- I'm not sure I want to wait even longer so it can also do prework for the next boot. Instead of tricks like this, why not load less cruft at boot?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  36. Re:You can't have both by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because there is none of your data in RAM.

    When you shut down, it actually reboots normally. Once the system comes back up, it automatically and instantly goes into S3 standby mode (suspend to RAM). As someone else said, you're basically making startup faster at the expense of making shutdown longer... but who cares when you just hit the button to shut down and walk away?

    Since you did a proper reboot first, all your data was (presumably) saved to disk. Since it sleeps immediately after a fresh startup, there was never a chance for you to open up applications and have unsaved data in RAM.
    =Smidge=

  37. Exciting by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've virtually NEVER had windows work reliably after a hibernate/resume. I acknowledge that there is probably a hardware/software combination out there that can do it, but I've never encountered one.

    For me, things just get unstable, and after 2 or 3 hibernates without a full shutdown, the whole system fails (if it didn't fail on the first resume).

    So although this may work on a pristine install, the thought of owning one of these after a few patches from Microsoft, installing an anti-virus and a few drivers would scare the living crap out of me.

    Reliable suspend alone is the justification I used (to myself) to move to the Mac.

    How about a vote? I'm willing to wager a little karma on it. If you have a similar experience, mod me up--if windows suspend/resume works perfectly for you, mod me down.

  38. Re:get some fucking priorities by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Psst,
    You are part of the government.
    If you think you are living in an island, you are about to be surprised.

    And unions have nothing to do with the current Automaker woes. Not. A. Damn. Thing.

    It's upper managements fault for not preparing for the change in markets.

    Parasite? what the hell are you talking about? Are you saying people shouldn't be paid for work?

    God you are an idiot.

    His post was not insightful, it is ignorant, emo, and self centered to the point of harm.

    OTOH I should expect this from someone who can't even grasp why the current pledge of allegiance is a prayer.

    ON a side note, at least we live in a society that allows you to go on and on spouting your ignorant drivel...no thanks to you.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. How does it know the difference by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    clean boot of Windows, without what ASRock calls 'accumulated garbage data,'

    you also get the security of knowing that you won't lose any data

    You insensitive clod! All my data IS accumulated garbage!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Okay, that was the best video I've seen in ages. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm really beginning to like ASUS. Not only do I like their approach to hardware a lot, but that was the most straight forward, unintentionally entertaining, non-bullshit video I've EVER seen from a corporation. I mean, yeah, it was dippy YouTube stuff, but seriously; Can you imagine any other main stream computer company allowing their tech monkeys to represent the mothership without the message first passing through a legion of marketing directors, lawyers and various haircuts in suits? Hell no!

    Imagine the plasticy, dumbed down crappola video with gawdawful elevator music and bad overlay graphic effects you would have gotten in nearly every other situation.

    Damn. ASUS is run by humans!

    -FL

  41. Linux vs. Windows Speed boots by DrYak · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's been done in 5 seconds..
    Doesn't even require a special motherboard, they did it by modifying Fedora on a EEE pc (something not known for it's speed)

    And above all the strategy behind the speedy boots are completely different :

    - Linux basically Just boots in 5 seconds. In a plain normal fashion. Everytime you push the button, no matter what, the system is up in 5 seconds (well except if you trashed your machine and disk have to be rechecked).
    But it's a plain standard boot.

    - Whereas, for Windows, ASRock has to resort to abusing the sleep/hibernate system. With the subtle difference is that they are not actually suspending the system to RAM/disk (in order to avoid accumulating garbage, as they say).
    They are resuming a special suspended "freshly booted" state.
    i.e.: when in fast boot mode, you are not actually booting Windows. You are resuming an image of a "Windows-that-just-got-started" suspend on RAM.

    The main implication is that the first time you boot, and after each system update (and you know that, given microsoft's track of security, you're still going to have patches coming often) or any other change that might render the pre-suspended image obsolete, you can't do this. You have to go through a slow boot, rebuild a pre-suspended state, and only after that it'll work.

    It's not a standard boot. It's not as robust as a real boot, and frequently it won't work. (not to mention that these pre-suspended image will be the perfect place to inject a vm-based rootkit).
    In short : not as useful as you would hope.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Linux vs. Windows Speed boots by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux basically Just boots in 5 seconds. In a plain normal fashion... ...Whereas, for Windows, ASRock has to resort to abusing the sleep/hibernate system.

      If they've found a way to boot Windows in 4 seconds, nobody other than haters is going to care how it was done. Calling the method an abuse of the hibernation system is as ridiculous as calling Jailbreaking an abuse of an iPod. It's your hardware.

      The main implication is that the first time you boot, and after each system update (and you know that, given microsoft's track of security, you're still going to have patches coming often) or any other change that might render the pre-suspended image obsolete, you can't do this. You have to go through a slow boot, rebuild a pre-suspended state, and only after that it'll work.

      They only come once a week, at most. Creating the new image can be done in the background after the system restarts, only taking as long as it would take to hibernate the computer. And you don't have to type in a password every time you get a system update.

    2. Re:Linux vs. Windows Speed boots by DA-MAN · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they've found a way to boot Windows in 4 seconds, nobody other than haters is going to care how it was done. Calling the method an abuse of the hibernation system is as ridiculous as calling Jailbreaking an abuse of an iPod. It's your hardware.

      I think you're missing the point. Since this is loading a hibernated image of a freshly booted system, this means that updates or changes in startup will be lost unless you remake the image. Since many Windows Updates require a reboot to take effect, this could result in remotely exploitable services running on your system.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  42. Boot Windows Vista in Four Seconds? by RogueSeven · · Score: 3, Funny

    Four seconds? That's nothing. I booted Windows Vista the very second I got my new machine to make way for Ubuntu.

    What's that, you didn't mean literally kick? I see.

  43. Re:Heh... It's using the Hibernate functionality.. by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is an excellent time for a car analogy. In the coldest of winter, I sit in my tiny subcompact sedan for 10 minutes waiting for it to reach a normal operating temperature. Would it be so bad if they found a way to make the car warm up in 4 seconds, with the side effect being it takes an extra 15 minutes go cold again after I turn it off?

    At the risk of sounding self-centered, I think a lot of computer users are like me. They approach their computer and want it to start working as quickly as possible. When they're done with it, it doesnt matter how long it takes to shut down because they're not waiting on it. Concerning your laptop, I think the problem is more with you having it set up to suspend when you close the lid, rather than a slow power down time. Maybe you should set it up so it suspends with a key combination rather than a screen closing event?

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. They are also just cooking with water... (Re:Video by kurzvorzirka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    [...] I must get ASRock motherboard!"

    No you don't :)

    As I understand from their diagram they are, probably quietly, rebooting the system and putting it immediately into an suspend state afterwards.

    So I emulated their technique with a batch file.

    http://bigfatflat.net/public/fastboot.bat

    REM *** fastboot.bat v0.1 *** 081113
    REM
    REM ASRock InstantBoot Batch-File Emulation
    REM Call fastboot.bat in a link with ACPISTATE
    REM Parameter S3 or S4 - fastboot.bat [S3,S4] and
    REM also put into your autostart without params.
    REM
    REM It's a good Idea, but they are also just cooking with water *g*
    REM They reboot the system and put it immediatly after the fresh boot
    REM into a Standby/Hibernation state.
    REM
    REM So you can shutdown your computer it will be fresh booted and is in
    REM waiting state for the new day.
    REM
    REM Because I like to automate things and I liked the Idea very
    REM much, I decided to emulate it. :)
    REM
    REM The 'easy' Ideas everyone thinks after, damned that could be from me,
    REM are mostly the best :) Enjoy! >> Usage below...
    REM
    REM And by the way... use it on your own risk! Don't blame me if you
    REM cant read and understand or are unable to use your favourite search
    REM engine.
    [...]