Slashdot Mirror


Ender in Exile

stoolpigeon writes "Orson Scott Card's work Ender's Game began as a novelette, which he says he wrote as a means of leading up to the full story he had developed, Speaker for the Dead. Ender's Game was published as a full novel in 1985, and won the Hugo and Nebula awards (as did Speaker for the Dead in '86 and '87). I think it is safe to say that Ender's Game is ensconced in its position as a science fiction classic. Now, 23 years later, Card has finished the first direct sequel to Ender's Game in his new novel Ender in Exile." Keep reading for the rest of JR's review. Ender in Exile author Orson Scott Card pages 377 publisher Tor Books rating 7 reviewer JR Peck ISBN 978-0765304964 summary A good midquel in the Ender's series While Speaker for the Dead was published right after Ender's Game, there is a huge gap in time between the two stories. Due to the effects of traveling at close to light speed, thousands of years pass between the two novels. Chapter fifteen of Ender's Game does give an explanation of the events that fill that time. Card also went on to write other novels set in the Ender universe that do not involve Ender directly but rather other students from the battle school and family. This makes Ender in Exile more of a 'midquel', a term Card uses in the afterword, than a sequel. Because of this, from a high level view of the plot, readers who have stuck with the saga will not find much new here. This is a closer look at events already related in other books for the most part.

Card is an able author and this story is solid. Much of it reminded me of some of my favorite classic science fiction. There is colonization, extended periods of life aboard space ships, discovery of alien civilization and not much in the way of hard science. Card's primary purpose is to analyze and consider the human condition as opposed to exploring technological possibilities or theories. Almost everything that is highly advanced is the result of alien technology and is never explained or understood. Much of it functions on an almost mystical or magical level.

Ender is a young adolescent with an incredibly unique life and mind. In this novel we see him transitioning and growing from a youth into a man. I was often reminded of Herbert's Paul Atreides when he was first on the run in the desert with his mother in the book Dune. Ender is aware that he is different and has amazing capabilities but he is unsure just what the full ramifications of that difference are. He is trying to find his place in humanity and in the universe as a whole.

The story encompasses four basic plot lines that flow one to the next. I never felt any great sense of urgency or climax and resolution in the story. Really what it felt like was a thread weaving together pieces from the earlier stories. While the themes and issues were great, sometimes the characters were remote or the working of the issues very subtle. The most impacting and emotional moments relied upon knowledge of events from the other books in the series to carry their full force. In that light the novel is very effective. I think that fans of the Ender series, already biased towards this work, are going to be very pleased and enjoy Ender in Exile greatly. They are going to get to dig just a bit deeper into this world and it's primary character Andrew Wiggin. They will enjoy moments of discovery and the answer to questions that may have been in the back of their minds, possibly for the last twenty years or so.

On the other hand, someone new to the series may not be as enthralled and may find the story to be a bit flat. If I could I would rate this book in two ways. For those who have not read all the other Ender books, a 6 or 7. This is not bad since the book is designed to sit in the middle of an existing set of tales. It is possible that someone could pick this book up without having read a single Ender story or novel and track with it. I think they would even find it interesting if a little flat. But for a fan of the series with a high degree of familiarity with the characters and events of this world it is probably a solid 8 or 9. At the very least, Card has done nothing to tear down what he has built up but has completed a sturdy addition to the body of work.

In the afterword Card has some interesting comments to make about reader involvement in helping him to write this story. He also explains how he would like to approach some discrepancies between this story and what is related at the conclusion to Ender's Game. I thought it was a sign of the times that an author, facing a large and complex world he had created but could not track on his own, was able to use the internet to call upon readers assistance in achieving as much consistency as possible.

This is a thoughtful, well written book. It may even motivate some to dig up an old copy of Ender's Game so that they can relive the enjoyment of a classic and see what is new to find. I think that most will not be disappointed. Some may not be as thrilled as they would hope, but there is something here for any science fiction fan.

On a side note, in conjunction with the release of this new book, Marvel Comics is doing a limited series comic adaptation of the original Ender's Game novel.

You can purchase Ender in Exile from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

24 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, kinda peaked at Speaker for the Dead, went downhill since. Cue XKFD comic but I'll let someone else whore for that karma.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not sure - he mentions monogamy as the optimum more than once - but I don't think it would really stand out unless one was already aware of some of the controversy around some of Card's statements on issues.
       
      There is a lot of time contemplating the morality of killing especially in regards to self-defense. I don't know that their is necessarily any position espoused beyond it being better not to kill others if possible. The book raises more questions than it gives answers. It didn't feel overly preachy to me - from any viewpoint - Christian or otherwise. Hopefully that helps to answer your "question".

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by bhima · · Score: 5, Funny

      So... I have to ask. Did you come to that conclusion before or after you selected your nick?

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by Rayban · · Score: 4, Informative

      He managed to keep the preaching out of the homecoming series, which had an openly-gay character. The character (Zdorab) had some bizarre views that were obviously influenced by Card's worldview, but it didn't take away from the book.

      The homecoming series dealt (though not as the primary focus) with some of the morality of "forcing" monogamous relationships on a small tribe of humans disconnected from society.

      I think he's an annoying editorial writer with back-asswards views, but this atheist can still enjoy his works.

      --
      æeee!
    4. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It isn't so much about 'preachy-ness' as it is about 'propaganda-ness'. In the Shadow series, for instance, we have the homosexual character of Anton. He is not in any way evil, Card doesn't ask us to fear or hate him as you might expect from a right wing writer.

      Instead (and arguably worse), when we are first introduced to Anton we are asked to pity him. He is given a ludicrously strong cognitive dissonance to ham handedly symbolize the dissonance that Card assumes the man must have because of his lifestyle. He is utterly lonely and unhappy, and it is heavily implied that he has considered suicide as the only option to end his suffering.

      Later in the story, Anton has *gasp* married. No, not to a man, but to a woman. In fact he is going to be a father. He is happy, talkative, and engaging. He mentions in passing that his homosexual tendancies have made his marriage harder but that with work they are able to get through it and live a full and happy life.

      In my opinion, this is a more disgusting attack on gay rights than any violent diatrabe could ever be.

    5. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by Leebert · · Score: 4, Funny

      I kind of liked Ender's Shadow, but a while after I read it, I realized that I now looked on Ender more as middle-management. :)

    6. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by dgris · · Score: 5, Funny

      As you can tell from the UID, I've been using that name for a long time.

      I don't want to lose the karma and the low UID

      Lol. 6-digit "low" uid. Freakin' newbies. ;-)

      --
      All I needed to know in life I learned from /usr/man.
    7. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, I think you're reading things into the books that aren't there. I never got the implication that Anton was suffering for any propagandized reason, or that he was gay for that matter. I certainly didn't think that it was odd that a lonely man would be happy when he had a family to keep him company, that's how anyone who had experienced years of loneliness would react.

      I can't help but feel that this is someone reading into the book what they want to read into it, which is what I find, 9/10 times, is at fault when people talk about the author being preachy about his/her values. I just didn't see any evidence for the claims you make in Card's books.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    8. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by phrenq · · Score: 4, Funny

      "basic Mormon tenants"

      Those are the best kind. Always out proselytizing so there's hardy any wear on the apartment.

    9. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by juuri · · Score: 4, Funny

      screw you old man, us newbs are taking over

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    10. Re:Hey, remember when Ender's Game was good? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 5, Insightful

      His position is simple: the government does not get to redefine "marriage" any more than it gets to redefine "day" and "night."

      And yet, the definition of marriage has certainly changed over the years. Without dogpiling on the Mormons more, feel free to read the Bible/Torah/Koran and count how many wives people have. Next, count how many wives men in America are allowed now.

      Or, look back to less than a hundred years ago when white people in America couldn't marry black people.

      Every time the issue has been brought to a vote, the overwhelming majority of Americans do not support gay marriage.

      Discounting your 'overwhelming majority' for the moment...

      Sixty years ago, the 'overwhelming majority' of Americans did not support interracial marriage. The courts, correctly, intervened to prevent the tyranny of the majority.

      In fifty years, kids will be taught in school that gay people didn't used to be able to marry, and they're going to wonder how anyone could deny such an obvious human right the same way we wonder how anyone could have ever opposed interracial marriage, women's suffrage, or the end of slavery. The future is always on its way and it's not on your side.

  2. Re:Nope, sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    good call, thats why I don't use ReiserFS, watch any movie with heath ledger and don't use DC power (Edison was a big douche bag).

  3. How we respond to technology by DrWho520 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Card's primary purpose is to analyze and consider the human condition as opposed to exploring technological possibilities or theories. Almost everything that is highly advanced is the result of alien technology and is never explained or understood. Much of it functions on an almost mystical or magical level.

    I always thought this was the point. In science fiction, the high technology is a plot device and how our interaction with said device describes aspects of human behavior is the story. I do not need to know how a technological fountain of youth works. I just need to know it makes people young again and requires something of a high cost personal cost, say the ability to feel love. How society treats the creator of this device, whether people who refuse to use it are ostracized by society, do people who use the machine experience regret? The dilithium crystal configuration of the device is irrelevant compared to those aspects of the story.

    Just my two cents.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  4. Re:Nope, sorry by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't really get it... I mean ok, even if you really think he is a mega-douche, why stop reading his books? Does that really do anything positive? Does somebody who has an opinion that you disagree with really offend/startle/upset/whatever you so much that you can't read anything they've written? I personally feel this is a big problem with our society today--somebody's political beliefs are enough to earn them boycotts, scorn, hate, risk their jobs, etc. Of course you as a free individual have every right to do whatever you want to do--including boycotting Orson Scott Card--but I just think our society should take a collective chill pill!

    I can see not BUYING more of his books, though at this point he's got so much money he could never sell another book and be ok, so it's a somewhat futile action, but I guess that matters..

    There are a ton of authors, actors, musicians, etc who I think are moronic halfwits when it comes to politics. I think the same thing about some of my friends and family too! I get past it. Douche though they may be, I couldn't care less what their political opinions are when it comes to listening to their music or reading their books. Why do you have to be in ideological lockstep with an author to enjoy their works?

    Apologies if I'm somehow misinterpreting your post...?

  5. Re:Nope, sorry by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you can enjoy someone's work without condoning their lifestyle... grow up.

    I believe an important part of growing up is taking the bigger picture into account, and deciding who and what we support based on more than just our immediate personal result.

    Just because he thinks different than you doesn't make his books any less enjoyable.

    Personally, for me it does. I never got around to checking out Card's workt though it's often been recommended to me by those who know my tastes, but if one of his books were put in my hand now I'd see the name of a man who has seen fit to loudly classify many of my family and friends as second-class citizens.

    My money and time is best spent elsewhere.

  6. Re:Nope, sorry by Cornflake917 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't blame him. According the article, Card said some pretty hateful things, and seems to have some ideologies that could really damage America's future. Personally, I still might read the new book, but it might be a purchase that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

    What about all of the music we enjoy? Most musicians do things that many people don't condone.

    While doing drugs and engaging in rampant promiscuity are things I don't really condone, inciting hatred, bigotry, ignorance, and possible violence is on a whole other level. I can't think any musicians that I listen to who provoke such horrible things.

  7. Those are usually pretty light. by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem is that as you get further and further away from current science you end up more and more in the realm of "magic".

    And if the writer is resorting to that, then the story is probably going to be pretty light and dependent upon plot contrivances to get the writer out of any corner he ends up writing himself into.

    In the fountain of youth example, it could matter. How available is the process? Is it possible to restrict who gets it? What about pricing? Would there be wars over it with eternal youth offered as the plunder? Or is the secret something anyone can cook up in their kitchen using dandelions and shower scum?

    Light stories are good for obvious moral statements (think "Twilight Zone"). But they tend to fall apart on anything longer.

    The more basic the change is (eternal youth) the more ramifications it will have on society. And the less likely the writer will have addressed them. Or even thought of them.

  8. Re:Nope, sorry by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article you link to links to Card's essay on homosexual marriage. Reading the original Card essay, I didn't find the quoted statement. I find that a bit odd since the quote is quite lengthy. So it appears either the quote was never there and the article's author is fabricating a story or the quote was redacted. I'm curious what the truth is.

  9. Spoiler by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ender proves himself by posthumously baptizing all the souls of his victims, thereby justifying all the killing and giving the story a feel-good Hollywood ending.

  10. Re:don't remember anything of the sort by callmetheraven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Orson? Is that you? Knock off the AC posting shit and take your flogging like a man.

    --
    You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  11. Truth is he wrote it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not in the article in 'Civilization Watch', but in his blog for the Mormon Times.

    Link is http://mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/orson_scott_card/?id=3237

    Personally, bigotry like this isn't enough, in itself, for me to reject a writer. But, it would certainly color my view of what he writes - any lessons or morals expounded in the book would have to be put to extra scrutiny in light of the moral defect of the writer (to put it plainly).

  12. *sigh* you're worse than homophobes by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why?

    Ask the writer of the article that question, since I was referencing his opinion.

    Orson Scott Card is a homophobe and douche? His life's work is meaningless to me.

    Because he has opinions you don't like, his work's meaningless? That doesn't sound overly harsh/condemning to you? Card has many openly homosexual characters in his books, and I can't think of a single one that's a villain.

    You, on the other hand, can't stand that he thinks homosexuality is wrong and speaks out about it, therefore anything he does is tainted. Congratulations, sir, you've successfully demonized people on the other side of the argument and made intelligent, rational discourse nearly impossible.

  13. Re:Nope, sorry by dedazo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, yes. That quotes the wrong article, which appeared in the Mormon Times, not in the Rhino Times.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  14. Re:Nope, sorry by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
    He's one of the very few popular writers who admits (gasp!) to being a Christian.

    You may not have noticed this but we're awfully keen on J. R. R. Tolkien around here.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.