Slashdot Mirror


Urine Passes NASA Taste Test

Ponca City, We love you writes "Astronauts flying aboard space shuttle Endeavour are delivering a device to the International Space Station that may leave you wondering if NASA is taking recycling too far. Among the ship's cargo is a water regeneration system that distills, filters, ionizes, and oxidizes wastewater — including urine — into fresh water for drinking or, as one astronaut puts it, 'will make yesterday's coffee into today's coffee.' The US space agency spent $250M for the water recycling equipment but with the space shuttles due to retire in two years, NASA needed to make sure the station crew would have a good supply of fresh water. The Environmental Control and Life Support Systems uses a purification process called vapor compression distillation: urine is boiled until the water in it turns to steam. In space, there's an additional challenge: steam doesn't rise, so the entire distillation system is spun to create artificial gravity to separate the steam from the brine. The water has been thoroughly tested on Earth, including blind taste tests that pitted recycled urine with similarly treated tap water. 'Some people may think it's downright disgusting, but if it's done correctly, you process water that's purer than what you drink here on Earth,' said Endeavour astronaut Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper."

64 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Neat by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

    However, I don't think anybody wants to drink this warm, so better make that piss frosty.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Neat by siddesu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not many grown ups on this site, obviously.

    2. Re:Neat by narcberry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some of us can't throw away $250M on something like this, we're forced to drink ours le naturale.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    3. Re:Neat by Scutter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some of us can't throw away $250M on something like this, we're forced to drink ours le naturale.

      Yeah, but here you pay a buck per can and call it "Budweiser".

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    4. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The dupes here on Slashdot don't get it that the entire planet is a closed system too. Let them have their Xboxes; when the time comes we'll use them for soylent green. Mmmmm, soylent green...

    5. Re:Neat by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's not just this site. the maturity level implied by the summary/article bodes poorly for the human race.

      it's called the water cycle. any water you consume, no matter where it's from, has been recycled through natural ecological/biochemical processes. in fact every molecule that makes up your body has been "recycled" in countless ways.

      there's nothing gross or unsanitary about recycling the waster from urine through proper distillation. there is absolutely no difference between drinking water distilled from urine and water distilled from rain water or river water. that kind of irrational thinking is the reason why people will spend 10x the money to buy name brand drugs rather than the chemically & pharmacologically identical generics.

      you should be more grossed out by keeping your toothbrush within 20 ft of your toilet (as most people seem to do) since studies have shown that fecal bacteria can be sprayed up to 20 ft from the toilet each time the toilet is flushed.

    6. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, pretty disgusting. That's why I never flush my toilet.

    7. Re:Neat by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean InBev?

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    8. Re:Neat by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why don't they just make still-suits?

      They worked just fine on Dune.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Neat by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mythbusters looked at the toothbrush / fecal bacteria thing and found bacteria on a toothbrush kept in the kitchen. That stuff gets everywhere.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    10. Re:Neat by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Informative

      You jest, but in some countries like China or Mexico, the excrement-ridden toilet paper isn't flushed. It's simply tossed into the wastebasket. It's one of those foreign things that's hard to take at first sight, much like public sale of dogs for human-food.

      I was introduced to the T.P. phenomenon after a Mexican buddy visited my home. I'd been to Mexico many times but I didn't know not to flush because I never took shits there and I was usually so drunk that I never bothered to look in the trash bins. Seeing that ugly brown clump in my wastebasket was enough to ban him from my apartment for a good 2 months before I learned the truth from a few more buddies at home and abroad. Ahh, Western ignorance! :D

    11. Re:Neat by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny you mention that. In a news segment on Canadian TV last year, there was a major deal between breweries being worked on.

      So, a few reporters decided to ask local beer drinkers in pubs if the beer of either company was worthwhile. The answer 100% of the time: "I don't drink either - it upsets my stomach. Only imports!"

      So maybe this association to the NAStronauts waste recycling program has some truth.

    12. Re:Neat by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to have sewage reclamation plants in California as one of my clients. They take fresh sewage, separate it, clean it, and turn it back around as drinking water. It happens all the time.

      However, the toothbrush myth was debunked on Mythbusters. Toothbrushes kept closer to the toilet did not contain more bacteria. However, they did show that toothbrushes all over the place, even kept outside the bathroom (in the middle of the lab) had bacteria. They pretty much all had the same levels of bacteria.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    13. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seeing that ugly brown clump in my wastebasket was enough to ban him from my apartment for a good 2 months before I learned the truth from a few more buddies at home and abroad.

      Holy fricken' easter egg surprise batman!... You're very forgiving to only ban him for 2 months.
      What's this "truth" you're talking about? Foreigners not following local customs and doing grotesque things, is okay?
      When in Rome, do as the Romans do - unless they do it in a basket, then all bets are off.

    14. Re:Neat by multisync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup. Most computer keyboards have more fecal coliform on them than most toilet seats.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    15. Re:Neat by cyn1c77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mythbusters looked at the toothbrush / fecal bacteria thing and found bacteria on a toothbrush kept in the kitchen. That stuff gets everywhere.

      That's not from the toilet flushing, that's because you left me alone with your toothbrush for 5 minutes.

      I can't help it, when I have an itch, I HAVE to scratch it!

    16. Re:Neat by vistic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know H and O don't stay inseparably linked for all eternity once they join up as H2O, right?

      It's a dynamic, complex chemistry-filled world.

    17. Re:Neat by Paltin · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are more molecules of water in a cup then there are cups of water on the Earth.

      So, statistically speaking, we've all eaten Jesus. Ironic that it doesn't take Christian magic to make that happen. Also makes you wonder about whether you need Catholic Priest for transubstantiation ("No thanks father, I brought my own Jesus to eat").

    18. Re:Neat by polar+bear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm British, and the first time I came across this "no flush" was actually in ... Newport, Rhode Island! Apparently the hotel and local plumbing couldn't cope with the paper.

      N.

    19. Re:Neat by JamesP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People do that because the hydraulic system (is not as good as in the US/etc and) gets clogged if you do that.

      For people who are used to it, it's no biggie. Yeah, I know, "excrement ridden", sounds gross, but it's only a matter of taking it, closing the bag and disposing it.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  2. HOWEVER by FunkyRider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you process water that's purer than what you drink here on Earth. - It might be the case physically/chemically, but not psychologically.... "Look, I'm drinking purified pee and it's tasty!" God...

    --
    just wonder why there are so many anonymous cowards in this world....
    1. Re:HOWEVER by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From your high userid I can identify you as a noob. For future reference, these types of comments are best posted ANONYMOUSLY. God help you if anyone knows your real name. I foresee a future employer doing a google search on your various aliases and THAT comment turning up.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:HOWEVER by weber · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Wow, what a dedicated employee! No bathroom breaks, just sitting working endlessly at his computer with at tube from his pants to this mouth."

  3. In space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...no one can hear you steam. Your piss.

    Space is a horrible place.

  4. Re:And for this bright idea... by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dont mind him, he's just takin' the piss.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  5. More like "not far enough" by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh yeah, funny, astronaut pee. But for crying out loud (and losing valuable water in the process), what is so hard to understand about a closed system?

    "Going too far" is spending millions of dollars to send precious DHMO to the space station, when there are perfectly good pre-assembled dihydrogen monoxide molecules being blown out into the vacuum.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  6. Re:And for this bright idea... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, they paid two hundred and fifty million dollars to get it to work. In space. Without taking up to much space or energy in the space station. (Where both are at a premium.)

    And this is essential technology if we are ever going to leave the Earth-Moon system. Shipping enough water for a manned trip to even the nearest planet is simply prohibitive, in weight, volume, and cost. So long-term it's a good investment. (If you think we should invest in space at all, of course...)

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  7. Childish by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's bad enough that the mainstream media has been acting like a bunch of prepubescent children over the urine recycling, but now Slashdot has to get into the game as well?

    "that may leave you wondering if NASA is taking recycling too far"

    Uh, nope, it doesn't leave me wondering that at all. In fact, when I first read about it I was rather surprised that the ISS wasn't recycling urine already. Any manned moon-base, or long-duration trip to reach Mars, would absolutely require the recycling of urine.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Childish by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

      People are too far from their food. If people are upset over urine, what would they think of all of the solid waste that ends up as fertilizer?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Childish by pi_rules · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, when I first read about it I was rather surprised that the ISS wasn't recycling urine already.

      Same here.

      Isn't it pretty much the safest source of drinking water? You only need something that can handle things that are already in the bodies of the astronauts. We can safely assume none of them have any nasty viruses in them, and I'm pretty sure we don't have bacteria in our own urine, so you're down to getting the sodium and urea out of it I guess.

    3. Re:Childish by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, when I first read about it I was rather surprised that the ISS wasn't recycling urine already.

      Same here.

      Isn't it pretty much the safest source of drinking water? You only need something that can handle things that are already in the bodies of the astronauts. We can safely assume none of them have any nasty viruses in them, and I'm pretty sure we don't have bacteria in our own urine, so you're down to getting the sodium and urea out of it I guess.

      This has been debated here in Australia in places where water is very scarce. One issue is with hormones and drugs which get into the urine and can find their way back into the food supply via a recycling system.

      Outside inputs to the food chain are heavily regulated on the ISS so I assume this aspect is taken care of.

    4. Re:Childish by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some woman called Animal Control complaining that a bunch of us were letting our dogs pee at the park, where kids played. Guess she never really thought about where all the squirrels, rabbits, birds, rats, and other critters do their business.

  8. If you want to impress me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    turn today's brownies into tomorrow's brownies

    1. Re:If you want to impress me by Bicx · · Score: 5, Funny

      McDonald's uses a similar process to create their hamburger patties.

  9. disgusting? by pescadero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is that so disgusting? All the water you drink was probably pee at some point anyway.

    1. Re:disgusting? by frieko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If life has had enough time to fill the air with oxygen, it's had enough time to fill the oceans with pee.

  10. Recycling too far? Heck no by Titoxd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although it makes for a nice Beeb quip, no, it is not too far. Sending water into low-Earth orbit is not cheap (a launch delta-V of ~ 9 km/s) , and sending it to other places like the Moon and Mars is even more expensive. That's why it is necessary to begin testing and using this technology, where it is possible to actually send replenishment water in case something doesn't work properly.

    1. Re:Recycling too far? Heck no by ArcSecond · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your rational response is too much for the morons in the mainstream media and (unsurprisingly) Slashdot submitters/editors to parse.
      Try to keep your analysis to something a little more apropriate for a grade 3 class, please. I mean in a story that is about conserving resources, ensuring safety, and pushing humans-in-space technology forward, how are you going to draw attention to your story if you don't pander to bathroom humour and sexual innuendo?
      We don't need your kind around here, elitist.

      --

      I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

  11. Taking recycling too far by KenMcM · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd be worried if they were attempting this and they didn't take the recycling far enough.

  12. closed eco-systems by irtza · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Earth is also a closed ecosystem where we breath in the burnt remains of food ingested by our neighbors, where tap water is derived from the same lakes and streams that animals use as public toilets. Just because the filtration occurs further away and uses some natural bedrock, doesn't make it any different.

    Once you have just steam, it can no longer be considered urine, so drinking water is made from condensed steam

    I for one plan on no longer partaking in this twisted backwards environment. Long ago I employed the oil companies to convince the ignorant masses to emit large quantities of CO2 - in an elaborate plot to raise global temperatures and melt the pristine icecaps which I will then route into my drinking water. Furthermore, I will destroy this insane ecosystem that exists in this evil urine drinking manner. You may wonder why I am willing to so freely say this, but what can you do about it? What can you do! mu-hahaha.

    anyone know what we were talking about?

    --
    When all else fails, try.
  13. Re:And for this bright idea... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These are a good investment even without interplanetary missions. One of the features of Frank Herbert's novel Dune that I always thought fascinating was the stillsuit, where a person's waste water, whether urine, tears, or sweat, could be recycled with extreme efficiency. If you work in the desert, wouldn't it be nice to have one of these for emergencies?

  14. Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by n76lima · · Score: 5, Informative

    The waste water treatment industry has 3 levels of treatment here on Earth. Primary was what was done in the 60's and before (if any treatment). Solids were ground and held to allow bacteria to digest it (the septic tank method) and it was dumped in the river to dilute it for downstream, with a shot of Chlorine. Then secondary treatment came online in the 70's and later, which is what most municipalities do today, where the solids are filtered out by vacuum or pressure filters and burned or buried, but you'd still be able to tell that the chlorine treated effluent was far from potable.

    Finally there is tertiary treatment, which yields water so pure you could drink it (disgusting as it might seem), and this is what is implemented at locations such as Lake Tahoe CA. The water flowing out of the waste water treatment is cleaner than that in the lake itself, after the calcium filtration, etc. There are also de-nitrogenation and de-phosphoration processes to "scrub" the effluent of excess Nitrogen and Phosphorus.

    How did you think the Mission to Mars was going to supply water to the crew? Certainly could not tanker enough fresh water to make the multi-year trip to Mars AND BACK.

  15. Re:Yeah, well by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you know it wasn't actually Budweiser?

  16. blind taste tests? by JimboFBX · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Here I'll put a blind fold on you and.. there you go, ok now drink this delicious fluid." "Hmmm its water, but it doesnt taste like tap water, it tastes filtered. Aquafina?" "No, pee" *PHHHttt*

  17. Tell that to the guy by dj245 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tell that to the guy in this movie. The only time I watched it I was thinking that couldn't possibly work.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Tell that to the guy by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to the guy in this movie

      WTF? You should have linked to Dune, not frigging Waterworld! Now go hand in your geek card.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Tell that to the guy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it is. It reminds me of a great put down on some forum. "Since you were born after Star Wars I have no interest in your opinion on this matter, or of anything else"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Tell that to the guy by gnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tell that to the guy in this movie
      WTF? You should have linked to Dune, not frigging Waterworld! Now go hand in your geek card.

      Blasphemer. You linked to the 1984 Sting version of Dune!?!
      Here. Have a nerd's Dune link... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0142032/

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:Tell that to the guy by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That implies acknowledging the Dune movie. No true geek would do so, as the book is clearly superior. Thus, the waterworld link sidesteps the issue. This is not, of course, as bad as linking Starship Troopers or any reference whatsoever to Highlander II.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:Tell that to the guy by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pfft, heres a real nerdy Dune link... the unfinished 1976 movie version:

      http://www.hotweird.com/jodorowsky/dune.html

      It was supposedly being done by illustrious gentlemen such as Salvador Dali and H.R. Giger, but ran out of money. It also had a rather weird and political take on Dune...

  18. Re:Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do you know it wasn't actually Budweiser?

    Because he only puked for an hour!
     

  19. All water used to be pee by imneverwrong · · Score: 2, Informative

    Urine is water with stuff dissolved in it. Remove the solutes, and you get water again, which is all that this process is doing. There is nothing special about it, nature has been doing this for a long__________ time, as has the republic of Singapore

  20. Re:Woo! by Surt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the home version is a few miles down the road, typically.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  21. Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "This is our advanced technology unit" she said, lifting up a small backpack. "We've developed a miniaturized package for field parties; twenty pounds of equipment contains everything a man needs for two weeks:food, water, clothing, everything."

    "Even water?" Elliot asked. Water was heavy: seven-tenths of human body weight was water, and most of the weight of food was water; that was why dehydrated food was so light.
    But water was far more critical to human life than food. Men could survive for weeks without food, but they would die in a matter of hours without water. And water was heavy.

    Ross smiled. "The average man consumes four to six liters a day, which is eight to thirteen pounds of weight. On a two-week expedition to a desert region, we'd have to provide two hundred pounds of water for each man. But we have a NASA water-recycling unit which purifies all excretions, including urine. It weighs six ounces. That's how we do it."

    Seeing his expression, she said: "It's not bad at all. Our purified water is cleaner than what you get from the tap."

    "I'll take your word for it."

  22. A very necessary step by sdaemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If we're to survive as a species, in the long run, we have to get off this rock. Permanently. And unless we perfect some form of cryo-sleep or faster than light travel (possibly even if we DO perfect those), we're going to need some means of recycling our own waste products into usable substances.

    I've been in situations where the only water available for drinking also happened to be the local wild animals' mudhole. Animal urine and fecal matter were most certainly present, but there was no other water for miles in any direction. So it was scooped up, run through a rag to skim off any solids, run through an activated charcoal filter to purify it, pumped full of iodine to kill any microbes that might have survived the charcoal filtration, then turned into koolaid to mask the taste. Survival situations will do wonders for changing what you are and are not willing to drink. I was fortunate that I had all that equipment for purification. Those living in third world nations don't have the option of stocking up at the local REI.

    And I imagine space travelers heading for outer worlds, asteroid belts, or other star systems will have their options pretty limited as well :)

  23. in Soviet Russia..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    well, you drink it as urine.

  24. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

  25. Re:And for this bright idea... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gee whiz, that was a bad joke.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  26. NO new water on earth - we all drink old urine by spineboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As the father post pointed out - it's basically a closed system. We've been breathing the same farts, drinking the same urine from the beginning - it's just that it's not so blatant as in the satellite.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  27. Re:conspiracy theory-esque by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yeah, I know it sounds like the rant ... but here's a link to a NASA page from November 2000. The device in question is the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS). And I quote:

    The ECLSS Water Recycling System (WRS), developed at the MSFC (Marshall Space Flight Center), will reclaim waste waters from the Space Shuttle's fuel cells, from urine, from oral hygiene and hand washing, and by condensing humidity from the air. Without such careful recycling 40,000 pounds per year of water from Earth would be required to resupply a minimum of four crewmembers for the life of the station.

    Honestly, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but this was pretty damned blatant. Sorry for the lack of supporting linkage. I couldn't remember the system's acronym, and I was feeling a bit lazy.

  28. Re:And for this bright idea... by anilg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I agree. It was in bad taste.

    --
    http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
  29. Re:And for this bright idea... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the movie, the suits were black to suck up even more solar rays

    Which was stupid. The book clearly states the Fremen wearing light robes over the stillsuit, for better camouflage, and, yes, keeping cool.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  30. Iodine by matt+me · · Score: 2, Informative

    After the water has been through the purification system, they add iodine. They don't need to, but the water is so pure it tastse weird, so iodine is added to make it more familiar.

  31. Do you really think... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... that the air you breathe or the water you drink or the food you eat hasn't already been through at least one set of lungs or digestive tract? The Last Breath of Caesar" calculation shows that every breath each of us takes likely contains 1 molecule of Caesar's Last Breath.

    Similarly, every glass of water you drink has an average of 3.6x10^12 or 3.6 million million molecules of Titanic Water (water from the iceberg that sunk the Titanic).

    From that link:

    The same kind of concentration also applies to a glass of 12 year old malt Scotch whisky because the water came from the same ecosystem. It is a sobering thought that ice cubes floating in whisky contain molecules which were once part of the iceberg that sunk the Titanic, but it's a fact. If you wanted to have ice that didn't contain any "Titanic Water", you could achieve this by the curious irony of using ice from a modern iceberg! Any ice in icebergs now, for example from Greenland, has formed from snow which fell thousands of years ago. So, if you had a glass of old malt whisky with ice from an iceberg, the ice would contain no molecules from the iceberg that sunk the Titanic, whereas the whisky would do!

    Their disclaimer is funny, too: "Special disclaimer: We do not advocate or condone the use of ICE in whisky, and it is merely used here for illustrative purposes. We also do not condone the sinking of ships, and acknowledge that the iceberg was not entirely to blame for the sinking of the Titanic."

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.