Slashdot Mirror
Google To Host 10M Images From Life Magazine's Archive
CWmike and other readers alerted us to Google's announcement that it was making available 10 million images from Life magazine's archives dating back to the 1750s. (Most of the news accounts covering this announcement refer to Life's "photos," and none mention that photography wasn't invented until early in the 19th century.) Only a small percentage of the images — including newly digitized images from photos and etchings — have even been published. The rest have been "sitting in dusty archives in the form of negatives, slides, glass plates, etchings, and prints." At this point about 20% of Life's archive is online; the rest is promised within months.
Obligatory:
It's lifelike pictures Jim, but not as we've known them.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
I wonder was the copyright is for these. Are they all public domain?
...was around in the 1750's?
Digital photography really sucked back then!
Playboy?
Penthouse?
Hustler?
Swank?
All the classic porn magazines that you could take anywhere with you? I tell you, you kids missing out!
The copyrights for previously-unpublished works vary, Project Gutenberg and Wikipedia probably have the answers you are looking for.
In general, anything created more than 120 years ago in the United States is in the public domain. Works that weren't "work for hire" live various-numbers-of-years after the death of the photographer but there is a presumption of public domain after 120 years unless it can be shown the photographer was alive "recently enough" that the copyright hasn't lapsed. There's also a "presumption of death on or before insert-date-here" under certain other circumstances.
I don't have the rules for previously-unpublished works-for-hire handy, but I think that for stuff not published before now, anything before 1923 is in the public domain in the USA. There were special rules in place a few years ago to "encourage" publishing previously unpublished works but I think that is over with.
If Life had done this during that special window, a lot of stuff that would have had only the remaining copyright would have enjoyed extended protection.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
For hot pictures, I lean more towards this or this.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Its good to know we can compare what the market looked like when the crash finally happens.
This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
"CWmike and other readers alerted us to Google's announcement that it was making available 10 million images from Life magazine's archives dating back to the 1750s. (Most of the news accounts covering this announcement refer to Life's "photos," and none mention that photography wasn't invented until early in the 19th century.)"
Photographs taken in the 1700s involved smearing silver nitrate on people's faces and pressing them against glass. The addition of a camera "lens" was hailed as a major advancement in the early 1800s.
you can find images from LIFE if you append this to an image search on google 'source:life'
Obligatory: Computer stuff. Lots of fun/memory-jogging images in there ... including portraits of Richard Stallman and family!
Breakfast served all day!
For those that haven't heard of it, shorpy.com has some very cool old high res pictures. I can spend hours looking through them.
Shorpy
Although, I swear I only read it in the dentists waiting room for the articles.
There's so many wonderful gay 90's memories.
Oh, those 90's? They're making fun of the 90's like we make fun of the 70's now. But there was nothing gay about the 90's.
I know google is amazing, but how are they going to host photos dating from the 1750s from a magazine started in 1936 that showcased images created using a technology invented in 1826. This makes no sense at all.
Get a web developer
Here's one:
http://images.google.com/hosted/life/f?q=porn++source:life&imgurl=c1ab21f9fc98b624
This is not how copyright works. If they are in the public domain, the reproduction doesn't matter. In fact, reproduction never changes copyright status, otherwise your copy of Civilization 2008 is illegal but your copy of your copy of Civilization 2008 is legal, which makes no fucking sense, I think you'll agree.
It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
...photography wasn't invented until early in the 19th century...
One amusing bit in David McCullough's biography of John Adams is the one where the Founding Father gets photographed for the first (and probably last) time. It took something like a 10-second exposure to take the picture, and Adams was astonished that his image could be registered in such a short period of time!
Hey everybody! Ankles!
Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
Dammit, I still like Google. And it's because of this nerdy and amazing shit that they do seemingly at random.
I know that they'll stagnate, and I know that I'll have a damn good reason to hate them at some point, but, just in the category of "cool shit done," I'm going to have to admit that I'm a huge fucking fan.
I want to read the entirety of Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire in pdf? No fucking problem. Thanks to Google.
I don't know very much about the mechanism of power, but if power is knowledge, then Google's done a lot to index it for our use. And for that I'm grateful.
They're all from Hawaii (or related to Hawaii), and they were taken all in 1941 or 1945. Like WWII didn't exist.
The photos are really cool, but I guess they've either held back the WWII archive or it's separated out of the 40's pictures.
You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
Oh shut the fuck up already.
That's 10,000,000 images, not 10 megapixels. Images will be standard 160x120 internet resolution with watermarks & popups.
Poster is a known troll, crapflooder and operates 14 accounts on Slashdot.
It should read "10 million images dating back to the 1750s from Life magazine's archives" since Life (not the earlier humor magazine of the same name) was first published in 1936.
It's a shame that Time seems to want to retain copyright over these images. The only real place meant for showcasing such images is the Flickr Commons, not some hastily-patched together image display format like Google has done. Then again, they could just upload it to flickr and still retain copyrights, but at least they can generate more comments, tag it up to make the search results rich (and describe it well) and show it to a community that actually appreciates photographs such as these.
Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
I completely agree. IMHO, copyright should be 25 years (or lower) or the death of the author, whichever is later.
"It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
"Multi dinero. Multi divorces. Multi ficky-fic all day long"
Don't know why the templates stop at 1860s, but:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=1850s+source%3Alife
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=1840s+source%3Alife
Etc. Interesting stuff.
Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
LIFE magazine has been around for hundreds of billions of years.
I still remember fondly poring over pictures the Big Bang in my youth.
No, not that Big Bang, the other one.
And publishing was much more difficult back then, because at that time there was no printing press, no camera, and, for that matter, no matter of any kind.
(Ah, the pre-baryonic universe. Those were the days. (Well, not "days", really, because planets and stars didn't exist yet, either, and time was still sorting itself out, but you get the idea.))
Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
Stories that are told that are retold become our culture. If the stories are owned and cannot be retold they might be lucrative, but they can't become culture. Copyright is the theft of culture from the future. Copyright must be abolished because as implemented it prevents the fair use of works long in the public domain.
This is a good place to thank Larry for keeping up the good fight. God Bless you Larry, I hope you win and I'm glad to continue to donate to your cause.
Help stamp out iliturcy.
foo undo mod accident intended to mod up