That's why the summaries exist. A parent can read the summary for Little Big Planet and then decide to let their child play the game regardless of the rudeness.
Why did it take a study to find that everybody has a unique body odour? It isn't much of a discovery, did anybody actually think that we all smell exactly the same before this?
High power bass moves around a lot of air. Headphones are very close to your ear, and get the same intensity as distant speakers with much, much less power. Most headphones can give good bass response.
You own your image, but the uniqueness of your image doesn't sell the product. Another person of similar appearance could be substituted easily. You own your image, but it's not of concern in this instance.
A model release is needed, for example, from Jessica Simpson to Proactiv. In this case, the model's identity is sigificant. The advertising would not have the same effect if Simpson were replaced with a previously unseen person. In contrast, a model release is not needed from the people featued in advertisments for Clearasil, because these people's identities don't personally sell the product (the model release may have been created as a safety net, but is unnecessary).
You're not a model.
Facebook can use your image to advertise themselves without a model release so long as they don't imply that you're endorsing them and your endorsement is special. Since barely anybody in the world knows you, it's fine to use your picture, your endorsement is not special, you're just a random person. Using a picture of a well-known person (eg celebrity, senator, member of parliament, business executive) to promote would require a model release.
Their server has been accessible anonymously for quite some time (like many other web servers, though few don't allow anonymous access). Choice of Facebook.
You can reject the contract. If you reject it, it is not binding on you, and you can click whatever buttons you like (including ones that are labelled Accept/Agree/Cancel/Ignore/Install/Watermelon).
Dynamic HTML generally doesn't take up much more bandwidth than normal HTML - a couple of extra bytes for a few CSS rules and a few lines of javascript. It makes pages feel slow and clunky because it makes the browser work harder, not because its straining your bandwidth. Dynamic HTML/ajax might take only a few hundred bytes, but that few hundred bytes is separate page, meaning many more HTTP requests must be made by the browser. This slows down loading on most high and low bandwidth home connections because of the lag time for a response.
Re:I thought those things were already broken
on
Yahoo CAPTCHA Hacked
·
· Score: 1
Firstly, one megabyte per picture is a more reasonable estimate than 0.1 megabytes for the size of a picture. Furthermore, these websites would be serving pages with the captcha and preview picture many times, while only some of these times would result in a user attempting to solve the captcha. On top of that, not every attempt would be valid, meaning that several megabytes of bandwidth has been used to solve only one captcha. Thus, the cost per solved captcha with this method could well be more than one cent per captcha.
You would be on very sticky ground if you rejected a candidate on the grounds of information you had gleaned online
Indeed you would, but information found online may sway an employer to believe that another applicant (especially if from a large pool) is better suited to the job than you, not necessarily that you don't qualify.
[...]feel free to fuck that hooker and then beat her to death with a baseball bat to get your cash back[...]
Actually, in Australia, GTA3 and GTA Vice City were banned because you were able to do that, "sexual violence". Both times if was after a complaint, not a decision originating at the OFLC. San Andreas wasn't banned because of that, but was banned because of Hot Coffee.
(PS The games were rereleased and allowed.)
Westfield Sports High School in Fairfield, NSW, Australia requires students who select any mathematics course (not only upper levels) to take a preselection test. If a student isn't brilliant at maths, Westfield Sports High School will not let them enter a maths course.
Slashdot Mirror
Like you say, Java is different to Javascript. Note that Javascript is different again.
You're not guilty. You did it, but you're innocent until proven guilty (in many nations).
Recommending users to install collections of programs downloaded from the internet isn't going to do much good.
Having it tethered near her poses an entanglement risk anyway.
I certainly hope Nasa thinks that, and I'm sure plenty of people in the general public think that as well.
It looks pretty good to me.
That's why the summaries exist. A parent can read the summary for Little Big Planet and then decide to let their child play the game regardless of the rudeness.
Why did it take a study to find that everybody has a unique body odour? It isn't much of a discovery, did anybody actually think that we all smell exactly the same before this?
Except she won't get near enough to pick up your scent if your BO drives her away first.
I assumed a Slashdot reader would consider that being charged is not illegal, neither is being litigated against.
So, T-Mobile sucks with SMS delivery, but it doesn't matter because your phone never breaks and you stay in coverage 24-7?
High power bass moves around a lot of air. Headphones are very close to your ear, and get the same intensity as distant speakers with much, much less power. Most headphones can give good bass response.
... Intel using illegal tactics to bump AMD out of the market ...
Citation needed.
Get Windows XP and quit your bitching.
You own your image, but the uniqueness of your image doesn't sell the product. Another person of similar appearance could be substituted easily. You own your image, but it's not of concern in this instance.
A model release is needed, for example, from Jessica Simpson to Proactiv. In this case, the model's identity is sigificant. The advertising would not have the same effect if Simpson were replaced with a previously unseen person. In contrast, a model release is not needed from the people featued in advertisments for Clearasil, because these people's identities don't personally sell the product (the model release may have been created as a safety net, but is unnecessary).
Care to tell me what the following clause means (it's just English after all):
Oh my god! The bird is drinking the water!
You're not a model. Facebook can use your image to advertise themselves without a model release so long as they don't imply that you're endorsing them and your endorsement is special. Since barely anybody in the world knows you, it's fine to use your picture, your endorsement is not special, you're just a random person. Using a picture of a well-known person (eg celebrity, senator, member of parliament, business executive) to promote would require a model release.
Their server has been accessible anonymously for quite some time (like many other web servers, though few don't allow anonymous access). Choice of Facebook.
You can reject the contract. If you reject it, it is not binding on you, and you can click whatever buttons you like (including ones that are labelled Accept/Agree/Cancel/Ignore/Install/Watermelon).
Firstly, one megabyte per picture is a more reasonable estimate than 0.1 megabytes for the size of a picture. Furthermore, these websites would be serving pages with the captcha and preview picture many times, while only some of these times would result in a user attempting to solve the captcha. On top of that, not every attempt would be valid, meaning that several megabytes of bandwidth has been used to solve only one captcha. Thus, the cost per solved captcha with this method could well be more than one cent per captcha.
Westfield Sports High School in Fairfield, NSW, Australia requires students who select any mathematics course (not only upper levels) to take a preselection test. If a student isn't brilliant at maths, Westfield Sports High School will not let them enter a maths course.